41
X-ray Diagnostics and Their Relationship to Magnetic Fields David Cohen Swarthmore College

X-ray Diagnostics and Their Relationship to Magnetic Fields

  • Upload
    janna

  • View
    35

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

X-ray Diagnostics and Their Relationship to Magnetic Fields. David Cohen Swarthmore College. Launched 2000: superior sensitivity, spatial resolution, and spectral resolution. Chandra. XMM-Newton. sub- arcsecond resolution. Both have CCD detectors for imaging spectroscopy: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: X-ray Diagnostics and Their Relationship to Magnetic Fields

X-ray Diagnostics and Their Relationship to Magnetic Fields

David CohenSwarthmore College

Page 2: X-ray Diagnostics and Their Relationship to Magnetic Fields
Page 3: X-ray Diagnostics and Their Relationship to Magnetic Fields

XMM-Newton

ChandraLaunched 2000: superior

sensitivity, spatial resolution, and spectral resolution

sub-arcsecond resolution

Page 4: X-ray Diagnostics and Their Relationship to Magnetic Fields

XMM-Newton

Chandra

Both have CCD detectors for imaging spectroscopy:

low spectral resolution: R ~ 20 to 50

And both have grating spectrometers: R ~ few 100 to 1000

Page 5: X-ray Diagnostics and Their Relationship to Magnetic Fields
Page 6: X-ray Diagnostics and Their Relationship to Magnetic Fields

q1 Ori C

Chandra ACISOrion Nebula Cluster (COUP)

Color coded according to photon energy (red: <1keV; green 1 to 2 keV; blue > 2 keV)

Page 7: X-ray Diagnostics and Their Relationship to Magnetic Fields
Page 8: X-ray Diagnostics and Their Relationship to Magnetic Fields
Page 9: X-ray Diagnostics and Their Relationship to Magnetic Fields

Stelzer et al. 2005

q1 Ori C: X-ray lightcurve

Page 10: X-ray Diagnostics and Their Relationship to Magnetic Fields

s Ori E: XMM light curve

Sanz-Forcada et al. 2004

Page 11: X-ray Diagnostics and Their Relationship to Magnetic Fields

XMM EPIC spectrum of s Ori E

Sanz-Forcada et al. 2004

Page 12: X-ray Diagnostics and Their Relationship to Magnetic Fields

z Pup

q1 Ori C

Chandra grating specra: q1 Ori C and a non-magnetic O star

Page 13: X-ray Diagnostics and Their Relationship to Magnetic Fields

Hot plasma emitting thermal x-rays

1 keV ~ 12 × 106 K ~ 12 Å

ROSAT 150 eV to 2 keVChandra, XMM 350 eV to 10 keV

Shock heating: Dv = 300 km gives T ~ 106 K (and T ~ v2)

Page 14: X-ray Diagnostics and Their Relationship to Magnetic Fields

Hot plasma emitting thermal x-rays

1 keV ~ 12 × 106 K ~ 12 Å

ROSAT 150 eV to 2 keVChandra, XMM 350 eV to 10 keV

Shock heating: Dv = 1000 km gives T ~ 107 K (and T ~ v2)

Page 15: X-ray Diagnostics and Their Relationship to Magnetic Fields
Page 16: X-ray Diagnostics and Their Relationship to Magnetic Fields

z Pup

q1 Ori C

Si XIIISi XIVMg XIMg XII

H-like/He-like ratio is temperature sensitive

Page 17: X-ray Diagnostics and Their Relationship to Magnetic Fields

z Pup

q1 Ori C

Si XIIISi XIVMg XIMg XII

The magnetic O star – q1 Ori C – is hotter

Page 18: X-ray Diagnostics and Their Relationship to Magnetic Fields

Differential Emission Measure (temperature distribution)

Wojdowski & Schulz (2005)

q1 Ori C is much hotter

Page 19: X-ray Diagnostics and Their Relationship to Magnetic Fields

1000 km s-1

Emission lines are significantly narrower, too

q1 Ori C(O7 V)

z Pup(O4 If)

Page 20: X-ray Diagnostics and Their Relationship to Magnetic Fields

Wade et al. 2008

Dipole magnetic field

Page 21: X-ray Diagnostics and Their Relationship to Magnetic Fields

Shore & Brown, 1990

Page 22: X-ray Diagnostics and Their Relationship to Magnetic Fields

Rotating tilted dipole

Simulation/visualization courtesy R. Townsend

Page 23: X-ray Diagnostics and Their Relationship to Magnetic Fields
Page 24: X-ray Diagnostics and Their Relationship to Magnetic Fields

temperature emission measure

MHD simulations of magnetically channeled wind

Channeled collision is close to head-on:Dv > 1000 km s-1 : T > 107 K

simulations by A. ud-Doula; Gagné et al. (2005)

Page 25: X-ray Diagnostics and Their Relationship to Magnetic Fields

Differential emission measure (temperature distribution)

MHD simulation of q1 Ori C reproduces the observed

differential emission measureWojdowski & Schulz (2005)

Page 26: X-ray Diagnostics and Their Relationship to Magnetic Fields
Page 27: X-ray Diagnostics and Their Relationship to Magnetic Fields

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

Sim

ulat

ion

EM (1

056 c

m-3)

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

θ1 Ori

C A

CIS

-I c

ount

rate

(s-1)

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0Rotational phase (P=15.422 days)

Chandra broadband count rate vs. rotational phase

Model from MHD simulation

Page 28: X-ray Diagnostics and Their Relationship to Magnetic Fields

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

Sim

ulat

ion

EM (1

056 c

m-3)

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

θ1 Ori

C A

CIS

-I c

ount

rate

(s-1)

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Rotational phase (P=15.422 days)

The star itself occults the hot plasma torus

The closer the hot plasma is to

the star, the deeper the dip

in the x-ray light curve

Page 29: X-ray Diagnostics and Their Relationship to Magnetic Fields

Emission measure

contour encloses T > 106 K

Page 30: X-ray Diagnostics and Their Relationship to Magnetic Fields

Helium-like species’ forbidden-to-intercombination line ratios – f/i or z/(x+y) – provide information about the location of the hot plasma

…not the density, as is usually the case.

Page 31: X-ray Diagnostics and Their Relationship to Magnetic Fields

g.s. 1s2 1S

1s2s 3S1s2p 3P

1s2p 1P

resonance (w)

intercombination (x+y)forbidden (z)

10-20 eV

1-2 keV

Helium-like ions (e.g. O+6, Ne+8, Mg+10, Si+12, S+14) – schematic energy level diagram

Page 32: X-ray Diagnostics and Their Relationship to Magnetic Fields

1s2s 3S1s2p 3P

1s2p 1P

resonance (w)

intercombination (x+y)forbidden (z)

g.s. 1s2 1S

Ultraviolet light from the star’s photosphere drives photoexcitation out of the 3S level

UV

Page 33: X-ray Diagnostics and Their Relationship to Magnetic Fields

1s2s 3S1s2p 3P

1s2p 1P

resonance (w)

intercombination (x+y)forbidden (z)

g.s. 1s2 1S

The f/i ratio is thus a diagnostic of the local UV mean intensity…

UV

Page 34: X-ray Diagnostics and Their Relationship to Magnetic Fields

1s2s 3S1s2p 3P

1s2p 1P

resonance (w)

intercombination (x+y)forbidden (z)

g.s. 1s2 1S

…and thus the distance of the x-ray emitting plasma from the photosphere

UV

Page 35: X-ray Diagnostics and Their Relationship to Magnetic Fields

Rfir=1.2 R*

Rfir=4.0 R*

Rfir=2.1 R*

Page 36: X-ray Diagnostics and Their Relationship to Magnetic Fields

He-like f/i ratios and the x-ray light curve both indicate that the hot plasma is somewhat closer to the

photosphere of q1 Ori C than the MHD models predict.

Page 37: X-ray Diagnostics and Their Relationship to Magnetic Fields

Some slides showing f/i ratios in zeta Ori, tau Sco… main point: there is NO evidence for a “near star

high ion problem”

Page 38: X-ray Diagnostics and Their Relationship to Magnetic Fields

z Pup S XV Chandra MEG

Page 39: X-ray Diagnostics and Their Relationship to Magnetic Fields
Page 40: X-ray Diagnostics and Their Relationship to Magnetic Fields

More possible topics:

Zeta Ori, HD191612 – magnetic but X-rays look “normal”

Tau Sco – narrow lines but f/i ratios imply plasma far from the photosphere

Sigma Ori E – X-ray DEM well reproduced by Rich’s RFHD modeling; flaring too (centrifugal breakout)

Early B stars are mysterious – large x-ray luminosities, soft spectra, narrow lines but no evidence for magnetic fields (theta Car, beta Cru)

Page 41: X-ray Diagnostics and Their Relationship to Magnetic Fields

Conclusions

Some conclusions…