3
(l Xcel Energy® May 18 , 2015 By Email Ms. Heather Bailey City of Boulder Executive Director of Energy Strategy & Electric Utility Development 1101 Arapahoe Ave., 1st Floor Boulder, CO 80302 William M. Dudley Assistant General Counsel 1800 Larimer Street, Suite 1100 Denver, CO 80202 Phone: 303.294.2842 Fax: 303.294-2852 Email: [email protected] Re: Public Service Company of Colorado Response to Request for Proposals Dear Heather: Thank you for forwarding me Boulder's request for proposals (RFP) requesting bids to provide a partial requirements wholesale electric power supply contract. Although it is not clear from the RFP document itself, you indicate that this RFP is exclusive to Public Service Company of Colorado (Public Service). I have attached Public Service's response. While we are not making a formal bid at this time, for reasons I will elaborate upon below, we are indicating our willingness to negotiate a requirements wholesale supply contract with Boulder, and are proposing a conceptual framework to go forward. To provide some brief context to our response, we believe that there are three primary goals Boulder is trying to achieve through its RFP: to obtain a transitional power supply arrangement for at least a five-year term; to provide a framework to allow for the introduction of new resources (presumably renewable resources) into Boulder's power supply mix; and to mitigate stranded costs. We would observe that these objectives taken together are not entirely consistent, so it will be important for us to have a better understanding of what Boulder's primary objective is for any ongoing power supply arrangement. Furthermore, as a practical matter, we believe that it will not be possible to have any meaningful discussions without understanding what our Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)-approved stranded costs will be, since the effect of a requirements arrangement will be to mitigate Boulder's obligation at least in part. Reflecting these considerations, our conceptual framework includes, among other things, the following components: • An expressed willingness to enter into a requirements arrangement with Boulder. We presently expect that the rates for this agreement will be at the same cost-

Xcel Cover Letter to Boulder Requirements RFP Response

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Xcel Cover Letter to Boulder Requirements RFP Response

Citation preview

  • (l Xcel Energy

    May 18, 2015

    By Email

    Ms. Heather Bailey City of Boulder Executive Director of Energy Strategy

    & Electric Utility Development 1101 Arapahoe Ave. , 1st Floor Boulder, CO 80302

    William M. Dudley Assistant General Counsel

    1800 Larimer Street, Suite 1100

    Denver, CO 80202 Phone: 303.294.2842 Fax: 303.294-2852

    Email: [email protected]

    Re: Public Service Company of Colorado Response to Request for Proposals

    Dear Heather:

    Thank you for forwarding me Boulder' s request for proposals (RFP) requesting bids to provide a partial requirements wholesale electric power supply contract. Although it is not clear from the RFP document itself, you indicate that this RFP is exclusive to Public Service Company of Colorado (Public Service). I have attached Public Service ' s response. While we are not making a formal bid at this time, for reasons I will elaborate upon below, we are indicating our willingness to negotiate a requirements wholesale supply contract with Boulder, and are proposing a conceptual framework to go forward.

    To provide some brief context to our response, we believe that there are three primary goals Boulder is trying to achieve through its RFP: to obtain a transitional power supply arrangement for at least a five-year term; to provide a framework to allow for the introduction of new resources (presumably renewable resources) into Boulder's power supply mix; and to mitigate stranded costs. We would observe that these objectives taken together are not entirely consistent, so it will be important for us to have a better understanding of what Boulder' s primary objective is for any ongoing power supply arrangement. Furthermore, as a practical matter, we believe that it will not be possible to have any meaningful discussions without understanding what our Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)-approved stranded costs will be, since the effect of a requirements arrangement will be to mitigate Boulder's obligation at least in part.

    Reflecting these considerations, our conceptual framework includes, among other things, the following components:

    An expressed willingness to enter into a requirements arrangement with Boulder. We presently expect that the rates for this agreement will be at the same cost-

  • Ms. Heather Bailey City of Boulder

    May 18,2015 Page 2

    based formula rates that are used to price service to our other six wholesale requirements customers.

    We can provide for flexibility in this arrangement to allow for Boulder to acquire other resources with the understanding that such resource acquisition will affect Boulder's stranded cost responsibility, and that there will need to be a make whole payment (or another agreed-to mechanism) to account for that effect.

    We will file a case to recover stranded costs at the FERC in the near-term. As required by the FERC, our application will specify the length of the obligation period (or L), a component of the FERC' s stranded cost formula. Because stranded cost mitigation is an important objective of the RFP, we believe that our filing will provide a basis to have more informed negotiations of any requirements contract. This filing should help facilitate discussions regarding the effect of a requirements agreement on stranded cost mitigation.

    I want to make one additional observation. In your email to me, you indicate that we encouraged Boulder to "propose a request for a wholesale power arrangement between PSCo and the City of Boulder." We were not, however, suggesting an RFP approach. We believe that there will be a great deal of complexity in negotiating an arrangement with Boulder given Boulder' s desire to acquire different resources coupled with a desire to mitigate stranded costs. We believe the better approach is to have a negotiation with Boulder after it has greater clarity regarding its objectives - in this regard, we believe our stranded cost filing will be useful as we note above - and desired terms. Most helpful at this time would be to have an idea of what resources Boulder wishes to acquire and when.

    Finally, while we question whether the City of Boulder' s January 1, 2018 date for possession and initiation of the wholesale electric supply is realistic or achievable, our willingness to supply transitional power together with the recommended approach described herein should allow both Boulder and our company to address these issues well in advance.

    We are submitting our response on a non-confidential basis.

    Please give me a call if you have any questions about our response.

  • Ms. Heather Bailey City of Boulder

    Enclosure

    cc: Jonathan Koelm

    May 18,2015 Page 3