6
Primary Source Document with Questions (DBQs) SELECTION FROM THE XUNZI: “HUMAN NATURE IS EVIL” Introduction Xunzi (Xun Qing, or Xun Kuang: c. 310-c. 219 BCE) lived at the very end of the Zhou dynasty. Like Mencius, he was an advocate and interpreter of the teachings of Confucius. Living a generation after Mencius, Xunzi lived through the final, brutal wars which ended with the state of Qin absorbing and unifying all the Chinese feudal states. Xunzi was a widely traveled scholar, teacher, and official. Document Excerpts with Questions (Longer selection follows this section) From Sources of Chinese Tradition, compiled by Wm. Theodore de Bary and Irene Bloom, 2nd ed., vol. 1 (New York: Columbia University Press, 1999), 179-183. © 1999 Columbia University Press. Reproduced with the permission of the publisher. All rights reserved. Selection from the Xunzi: “Human Nature Is Evil” Human nature is evil: its goodness derives from conscious activity. Now it is human nature to be born with a fondness for profit. Indulging this leads to contention and strife, and the sense of modesty and yielding with which one was born disappears. One is born with feelings of envy and hate, and, by indulging these, one is led into banditry and theft, so that the sense of loyalty and good faith with which he was born disappears. One is born with the desires of the ears and eyes and with a fondness for beautiful sights and sounds, and, by indulging these, one is led into licentiousness and chaos, so that the sense of ritual, rightness, refinement, and principle with which one was born is lost. Hence, following human nature and indulging human emotions will inevitably lead to contention and strife, causing one to rebel against one’s proper duty, reduce principle to chaos, and revert to violence. Therefore one must be transformed by the example of a teacher and guided by the way of ritual and rightness before one will attain modesty and yielding, accord with refinement and ritual, and return to order. … … A questioner asks: If human nature is evil, then where do ritual and rightness come from? I reply: ritual and rightness are always created by the conscious activity of the sages; essentially they are not created by human nature. … If human nature were good, we could dispense with the sage kings and desist from the practice of ritual and rightness. Since human nature is evil, we must elevate the sages and esteem ritual and rightness.

Xunzi Human Nature

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

philosophy of man

Citation preview

  • Primary Source Document with Questions (DBQs)

    S E L E C T I O N F R O M T H E X U N Z I : H U M A N N A T U R E I S E V I L Introduction Xunzi (Xun Qing, or Xun Kuang: c. 310-c. 219 BCE) lived at the very end of the Zhou dynasty. Like Mencius, he was an advocate and interpreter of the teachings of Confucius. Living a generation after Mencius, Xunzi lived through the final, brutal wars which ended with the state of Qin absorbing and unifying all the Chinese feudal states. Xunzi was a widely traveled scholar, teacher, and official. Document Excerpts with Questions (Longer selection follows this section) From Sources of Chinese Tradition, compiled by Wm. Theodore de Bary and Irene Bloom, 2nd ed., vol. 1 (New York: Columbia University Press, 1999), 179-183. 1999 Columbia University Press. Reproduced with the permission of the publisher. All rights reserved.

    SelectionfromtheXunzi:HumanNatureIsEvil

    Humannatureisevil:itsgoodnessderivesfromconsciousactivity.Nowitishumannaturetobebornwithafondnessforprofit.Indulgingthisleadstocontentionandstrife,andthesenseofmodestyandyieldingwithwhichonewasborndisappears.Oneisbornwithfeelingsofenvyandhate,and,byindulgingthese,oneisledintobanditryandtheft,sothatthesenseofloyaltyandgoodfaithwithwhichhewasborndisappears.Oneisbornwiththedesiresoftheearsandeyesandwitha fondness forbeautifulsightsandsounds,and,by indulging these,one is ledinto licentiousness and chaos, so that the sense of ritual, rightness, refinement, andprinciplewith which one was born is lost. Hence, following human nature and indulging humanemotionswillinevitablyleadtocontentionandstrife,causingonetorebelagainstonesproperduty,reduceprincipletochaos,andreverttoviolence.Thereforeonemustbetransformedbytheexampleofa teacherandguidedbythewayofritualandrightnessbeforeonewillattainmodestyandyielding,accordwithrefinementandritual,andreturntoorder.Aquestionerasks:Ifhumannatureisevil,thenwheredoritualandrightnesscomefrom?Ireply:ritualandrightnessarealwayscreatedbytheconsciousactivityofthesages;essentiallytheyarenotcreatedbyhumannature.Ifhumannatureweregood,wecoulddispensewiththesagekingsanddesistfromthepracticeofritualandrightness.Sincehumannatureisevil,wemustelevatethesagesandesteemritualandrightness.

  • Primary Source Document, with Questions (DBQs) on S E L E C T I O N F R O M T H E XUNZI : HUMAN NATURE IS EVIL

    Asia for Educators | Columbia University | http://afe.easia.columbia.edu Page 2 of 2

    Questions:

    1. How does Xunzis understanding of human nature compare to your own? 2. How does Xunzis understanding of human nature compare to that of

    Mencius? Which do you prefer, and why? 3. Why might the two men, from the same background, both self-appointed

    interpreters of Confucius, and only one generation apart, come up with their respective understandings of human nature?

    4. What implications does Xunzis understanding of human nature have for family life and government?

    Longer Select ion From Sources of Chinese Tradition, compiled by Wm. Theodore de Bary and Irene Bloom, 2nd ed., vol. 1 (New York: Columbia University Press, 1999), 179-183. 1999 Columbia University Press. Reproduced with the permission of the publisher. All rights reserved.

    SelectionfromtheXunzi:HumanNatureIsEvil

    Humannature isevil; itsgoodderivesfromconsciousactivity.Nowit ishumannaturetobebornwithafondnessforprofit. Indulgingthis leadstocontentionandstrife,andthesenseofmodestyandyieldingwithwhichonewasborndisappears.Oneisbornwithfeelingsofenvyandhate,and,byindulgingthese,oneisledintobanditryandtheft,sothatthesenseofloyaltyandgoodfaithwithwhichhewasborndisappears.Oneisbornwiththedesiresoftheearsandeyesandwithafondnessforbeautifulsightsandsounds,and,byindulgingthese,oneisledtolicentiousnessandchaos, so that the senseof ritual, rightness, refinement, andprinciplewithwhich onewas born is lost.Hence, following humannature and indulging human emotionswill inevitably lead to contention and strife, causing one to rebel against ones proper duty,reduce principle to chaos, and revert to violence. Therefore onemust be transformed by theexample of a teacher and guided by the way of ritual and rightness before one will attainmodesty and yielding, accord with refinement and ritual, and return to order. From thisperspective it is apparent that human nature is evil and that its goodness is the result ofconsciousactivity.Thuswarpedwoodmustbe laidagainstastraighteningboard, steamed,andbent intoshapebeforeitcanbecomestraight;bluntmetalmustbegroundonawhetstonebeforeitcanbecomesharp.Andinthathumannatureisevil,itmustwaitfortheexampleofateacherbeforeitcanbecomeupright,andforritualandrightnessbeforeitcanbecomeorderly.Now,ifpeoplelacktheexampleofteacherstheywillbepartialandnarrowratherthanupright;iftheylackritualandrightnesstheywillberebelliousandchaoticratherthanorderly.Inancienttimesthesagekings,recognizingthatthenatureofhumanbeings isevil that theyinclinetowardevilandarenotupright, that theyaredisposedtowardchaosandarenotorderlycreatedritualand

  • Primary Source Document, with Questions (DBQs) on S E L E C T I O N F R O M T H E XUNZI : HUMAN NATURE IS EVIL

    Asia for Educators | Columbia University | http://afe.easia.columbia.edu Page 3 of 3

    rightness and established models and limits in order to reform and improve the humanemotional nature andmake it upright, in order to train and transform the human emotionalnature andprovide itwith a guide.They caused them to attain order and to conform to theWay. And so today a person who is transformed by the instructions of a teacher, devoteshimselftostudy,andabidesbyritualandrightnessmaybecomeanobleperson,whileonewhofollowshisnatureandemotions,iscontenttogivefreeplaytohispassions,andabandonsritualandrightnessisalesserperson.Itisobviousfromthis,therefore,thathumannatureisevil,andthatitsgoodnessresultsfromconsciousactivity.Menciussaid,Thefactthathumanbeingslearnshowsthattheirnatureisgood.Isaythisisnotso; this comes of his having neither understood human nature nor perceived the distinctionbetweenthenatureandconsciousactivity.ThenatureiswhatisgivenbyHeaven:onecannotlearnit;onecannotacquireitbyeffort.Ritualandrightnessarecreatedbysages:peoplelearnthemandarecapable,througheffort,ofbringingthemtocompletion.Whatcannotbelearnedoracquiredbyeffortbut iswithinus is called thenature.What canbe learnedand, througheffort, brought to completion is called conscious activity. This is the distinction between thenatureandconsciousactivity.Thattheeyescanseeandtheearscanhearishumannature.Butthefacultyofclearsightdoesnotexistapartfromtheeye,nordoesthefacultyofkeenhearingexist apart from the ear. It is apparent that the eyes clear vision and the ears acutehearingcannotbelearned.Menciussaid,Now,humannatureisgood,and[whenitisnot]thisisalwaysaresultofhavinglostordestroyedonesnature.Isaythathewasmistakentotakesuchaview.Now,itishumannature that,assoonasaperson isborn,hedeparts fromhisoriginalsubstance1andfromhisnatural disposition, so that hemust inevitably lose anddestroy them. Seen in thisway, it isapparentthathumannatureisevil.Thosewhosaythatthenatureisgoodfindbeautyinwhatdoes not depart from the original substance and value in what does not diverge from thenatural disposition. They consider that the beauty of the natural disposition and the originalsubstance and thegoodnessof theminds intentions are [inseparable from thenature] in thesamewaythatclearsightisinseparablefromtheeyeandkeenhearingisinseparablefromtheear.Hence theymaintain that [the nature possesses goodness] in the sameway that the eyepossessesclearvisionortheearpossesseskeennessofhearing.Now,itishumannaturethatwhenoneishungryhewilldesiresatisfaction,whenheiscoldhewilldesirewarmth,andwhenhe iswearyhewilldesire rest.This is theemotionalnatureofhumanbeings.Yet,evenifapersonishungry,hewillnotdaretobethefirsttoeatifheisinthepresenceofhiseldersbecauseheknowsthatheshouldyieldtothem.Althoughheisweary,hewillnotdaretoseekrestbecauseheknowsthatheshouldworkonbehalfofothers.Forasontoyieldtohisfatherandayoungerbrothertoyieldtohiselderbrother,orforasontoworkon

    1ThewordXunziuseshereispu,atermthatoccursfrequentlyintheDaodejingandisoftentranslatedinthatcontextastheuncarvedblock.

  • Primary Source Document, with Questions (DBQs) on S E L E C T I O N F R O M T H E XUNZI : HUMAN NATURE IS EVIL

    Asia for Educators | Columbia University | http://afe.easia.columbia.edu Page 4 of 4

    behalfofhis fatherandayoungerbrother toworkonbehalfofhiselderbrother these twoactsarecontrarytothenatureandcountertotheemotions,andyettheyrepresentthewayoffilialdevotionand the refinement andprinciple that are associatedwith ritual and rightness.Hence,tofollowtheemotionalnaturewouldmeanthattherewouldbenocourtesyorhumility;courtesyandhumilityruncountertotheemotionalnature.Fromthisperspectiveitisapparentthathumannature is evil, and that goodness is the result of conscious activity.Aquestionerasks:Ifhumannatureisevil,thenwheredoritualandrightnesscomefrom?Ireply:ritualandrightness are always created by the conscious activity of the sages; essentially they are notcreatedbyhumannature.Thusapottermoldsclayandmakesavessel,butthevesseliscreatedbytheconsciousactivityofthepotterandisnotcreatedbyhishumannature.Inthesamewayacarpentercarvesapieceofwoodandmakesautensil,buttheutensil iscreatedthroughtheconsciousactivityofthecarpenterandisnotcreatedbyhishumannature.Asagegathershisthoughts and reflections, engages in conscious activity, and thus creates ritual and rightnessandproducesmodelsandregulations.Henceritual,rightness,models,andlimitsarecreatedbytheconsciousactivityofthesageandnotbyhishumannature.Whenapersondesirestodogoodhealwaysdoessobecausehisnatureisevil.Apersonwhoisshallow aspires to depth; one who is ugly aspires to beauty; one who is narrow aspires tobreadth;onewhoispooraspirestowealth;onewhoishumbleaspirestoesteem.Whateveronelacksinoneselfhemustseekoutside.Thereforeifapersonisrich,hewillnotaspiretowealth,andifheisesteemed,hewillnotlongforpower.Whatapersonpossessesinhimselfheneednotseekoutside.Onecanseefromthisthatthereasonhumanbeingsdesiretodogoodisthattheirnatureisevil.Nowhumannatureisdefinitelydevoidofritualandrightness.Therefore,they compel themselves to study and to seek to possess them. The nature knows nothing ofritualandrightness,andthereforetheyreflectandponderandseektounderstandthem.Thusthenatureisinborn,thatisall,andhumanbeingsneitherpossessritualandrightness,nordotheyunderstandthem.Ifhumannatureweregood,wecoulddispensewiththesagekingsanddesistfromthepracticeofritualandrightness.Sincehumannatureisevil,wemustelevatethesagesandesteemritualandrightness.Thereforethestraighteningboardwascreatedbecauseofwarpedwood,andtheplumblinecameintobeingbecauseof thingsthatarenotstraight.Rulersareestablishedandritualandrightnessareilluminatedbecausethenatureisevil.Fromthisperspectiveitisclearthat humannature is evil and that goodness is the result of conscious activity.Wood that isstraightneednotwaitforthestraighteningboardtobecomestraight;itisstraightbynature.Butawarped piece ofwoodmust be laid against a straightening board, steamed, and bent intoshapebeforeitcanbecomestraightbecauseitsnatureisnotstraight.Nowsincehumannatureis evil, peoplemust await ordering by the sage kings and transformation through ritual andrightness,andonlythendotheyattainorderandaccordwithgoodness.Fromthisperspective,itisclearthathumannatureisevilandthatgoodnessistheresultofconsciousactivity.

  • Primary Source Document, with Questions (DBQs) on S E L E C T I O N F R O M T H E XUNZI : HUMAN NATURE IS EVIL

    Asia for Educators | Columbia University | http://afe.easia.columbia.edu Page 5 of 5

    Someone may ask whether ritual and rightness and sustained conscious activity are notthemselveshumannature,whichwouldexplainwhythesageisabletocreatethem.Ireplythatthisisnotthecase.Apottermaymoldclayandproduceanearthenpot,buthowcouldmoldingpotsoutofclaybethepottersnature?Acarpentermaycarvewoodandproduceutensils,buthowcouldcarvingutensilsoutofwoodbethecarpentersnature?Thesagestandsinthesamerelation to ritual and rightness as thepotter to the thingshemoldsandproduces.How thencouldritualandrightnessandsustainedconsciousactivitybetheoriginalhumannature?Intheirhumannature,YaoandShunwereonewithJieandZhi, justasthenoblepersonandthe lesserpersonare,bynature,one.Howcould itbe thatritualandrightnessandsustainedconsciousactivityarehumannature?Ifthiswerethecase,whatreasonwouldtherebetohonorYaoorYuortohonorthenobleperson?PeoplehonorYao,Yu,andthenoblepersonbecauseoftheir ability to transform their nature, to generate conscious activity, and, through thisconsciousactivity, tocreateritualandrightness.Thusthesagenecessarilystands in thesamerelationtoritualandrightnessandconsciousactivityasdoesthepottertothethingshemoldsandproduces.From thisperspective,howcould itbe that ritual and rightnessandsustainedconsciousactivityarehumannature?ThereasonpeopledespiseJie,orthelesserperson,isthatthey follow their nature, indulge their emotions, and are content to give free rein to theirpassions,sothattheirconductismarkedbygreedandcontentiousness.Thereforeitisclearthathumannatureisevilandthatgoodnessistheresultofconsciousactivity.ThemaninthestreetcanbecomeaYu.2Whatdoesthismean?Ireply,WhatmadethesageemperorYuaYuwasthefactthathepracticedhumanenessandrightnessandtookuprightnessas his standard. This being so, humaneness, rightness, and proper standardsmust be basedupon principles that can be known and practiced. Any man in the street has the naturalendowmentneeded tounderstandhumaneness, rightness,proper standards,anduprightnessandtheabilitytopracticehumaneness,rightness,properstandards,anduprightness.ThereforeitisclearthathecanbecomeaYu.Isonetosupposethathumaneness,rightness,properstandards,anduprightnessarenotbaseduponprinciples that canbe knownandpracticed? If thatwere so, then even aYu couldnothaveunderstoodandpracticedthem.Isonetosupposethatthemaninthestreetdoesnothavethenaturalendowmentneededtounderstandthemortheabilitytoputthemintopractice?Ifthatwereso,thenthemaninthestreet,withinhisfamily,couldnotunderstandtherightnessthatpertainsbetweenfatherandsonand,without,couldnotcomprehendthecorrectnessthatpertainsbetweenrulerandsubject.But this isnot thecase.Themaninthestreet,within,canunderstandtherightnessthatpertainsbetweenfatherandsonand,without,canunderstandthecorrectnessbetweenrulerandsubject.Thusitisclearthathehasinhimthenaturalendowmentneeded to understand and the talent to put them into practice.Now if theman in the street

    2Thiswasapparentlyanoldsaying.Cf.Mencius6B:2:CaoJiaoasked,IsittruethatallhumanbeingsarecapableofbecomingaYaooraShun?Menciussaid,Itistrue.

  • Primary Source Document, with Questions (DBQs) on S E L E C T I O N F R O M T H E XUNZI : HUMAN NATURE IS EVIL

    Asia for Educators | Columbia University | http://afe.easia.columbia.edu Page 6 of 6

    takes this endowment that enables him to know and this talent that enables him to act andapplies them to the principles of humaneness and rightness, which are knowable, and thepracticeofhumanenessandrightness,whichispracticable,thenitisclearthathecanbecomeaYu.Ifthemaninthestreetapplieshimselftotrainingandstudy,concentrateshismind,unifieshiswill,andponderingandexaminingthingscarefully,continueshiseffortsoveralongperiodof time, accumulating good acts without stop, then he can penetrate to a spiritualunderstandingandformatriadwithHeavenandEarth.Thesageisapersonwhohasarrivedwherehehasthroughtheaccumulationofgoodacts.