@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 1
Intelligent Design
Dr. Heinz Lycklama
www.osta.com
All truth passes through three stages:1. Ridicule 2. Violent opposition3. Self-evident acceptance.
Arthur Schopenhauer
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 2
Chance, Necessity or Design?
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 3
Intelligent Design What is it? History of “Intelligent Design” Key movers and shakers Irreducible complexity Specified complexity Testing for complexity Arguments for a designer More examples of design Intelligent Design v. Creationism
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 4
What is Intelligent Design? "The theory of intelligent design holds that
certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection."
Source: The Discovery Institute
The leaders in the ID movement purposely do not equate the intelligent cause with God; moreover,
they are agnostic on the issue of the age of the earth and of the universe
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 5
Scientific Creationism Propositions There was a sudden creation of the universe, energy
and life from nothing Mutations and natural selection lack ability to
develop all living kinds from a single organism Changes of the originally created kinds of plants
and animals occur only within fixed limits There is a separate ancestry for humans and apes Earth’s geology can be explained by catastrophism,
primarily by the occurrence of a worldwide flood Earth and living kinds had a relatively recent
beginning (6000 -> 10,000 years ago)
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 6
Intelligent Design Propositions Specified complexity and irreducible complexity
are reliable indications of design Biological systems exhibit specified complexity
and use irreducibly complex subsystems Naturalistic mechanisms or undirected causes do
not suffice to explain origin of complexity Intelligent design constitutes the best explanation
for the origin of specified complexity and irreducible complexity in biological systems
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 7
Evidence for Design
Cosmology: evidence suggests the universe--including all matter, space, time, and energy--came suddenly into existence a finite time ago, contradicting the picture of an eternal and self-existing material cosmos
Physics: evidence has shown that the universe is "finely-tuned" for the existence of life, suggesting the work, as Astrophysicist Fred Hoyle puts it, "of a super-intellect”
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 8
Evidence for Design - 2 Biology: the presence of complex and
functionally integrated machines has cast doubt on Darwinian mechanisms of self-assembly
Molecular biology: the presence of information encoded along the DNA molecule has suggested the activity of a prior designing intelligence
Harvard biologist Richard Lewontin urges scientists to embrace a "materialism [that] is
absolute" and to stick with "material explanations, no matter how counter intuitive."
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 9
History of Intelligent Design
Greek philosophers a few100 years before Christ
Some early church fathersin 3rd/4th centuries
William Paley, Natural Theology (1802) Watch is the product of intelligence (watchmaker),
not the result of undirected natural processes Organisms (e.g. the eye) are the
product of intelligence Purposeful design -> purposeful designer Important sign of design is complexity
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 10
An Early Argument From Design
Rev. William Paley in Natural Theology, 1802:
"In crossing a heath, suppose I pitched my foot against a stone and were asked how the stone came to be there, I might possibly answer that for anything I knew to the contrary it had lain there forever; nor would it, perhaps, be very easy to show the absurdity of this answer. But suppose I had found a watch upon the ground, and it should be inquired how the watch happened to be in that place, I should hardly think of the answer which I had before given, that for anything I knew the watch might have always been there. Yet why should not this answer serve for the watch as well as for the stone? For this reason, and none other, viz., that when we come to inspect the watch, we perceive what we could not discover in the stone, that its several parts were put together for a purpose."
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 11
Modern Intelligent Design (ID) Began with the work of Charles Thaxton, Walter
Bradley, Michael Denton, Dean Kenyon and Phillip Johnson Scientifically, Darwinism is an inadequate
framework for biology Philosophically, Darwinism is hopelessly
entangled with naturalism Michael Behe, William Dembski, Stephen Meyer,
Paul Nelson and Jonathan Wells Proposed positive research program wherein
intelligent causes become key for understanding the diversity and complexity of life
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 12
Some Influential ID Books The Mystery of Life’s Origin, Charles Thaxton
et. al. in 1984 A Theory in Crisis, Michael Denton in 1986 Darwin on Trial, Phillip Johnson in 1991 Creation Hypothesis, Dean Kenyon in 1994 Reason in the Balance, Phillip Johnson in 1995 Darwin’s Black Box, Michael Behe in 1996 The Design Inference, William Dembski in 1999 Icons of Evolution, Jonathan Wells in 2000 The Design Revolution, William Dembski in 2004
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 13
Can Evolution be Proved in a Courtroom?
Phillip E. JohnsonJefferson E. Peyser
Professor of LawSchool of Law
University of California, Berkeleyhttp://www.arn.org/johnson/johome.htm
A Lawyer’s Perspective
Published in 1991
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 14
Johnson’s Critique Spreads This 1994 collection
of philosophers, physicists, astronomers, chemists, biologists, and linguists critiqued Darwinism and promoted Intelligent Design
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 15
Johnson’s Influence Leads to 1996 Conference
This conference at Biola University brought scholars from around the world
The world learns of the Discovery Institute’s Center for the Renewal of Science and Culture (CRSC).
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 16
Darwin’s Black Box
Lehigh U. biochemistry professor, Mike Behe’s1996 book was reviewed in mainline science journals.
For the first time Darwinists only argued with his conclusions, not his facts.
CT’s 1996 Book of the Year.
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 17
Irreducible Complexity Mike Behe introduced the concept of
irreducible complexity in his book, Darwin’s Black Box
Something is irreducibly complex if it is composed of two or more necessary parts
Remove one part and function is not just impaired but destroyed
A mousetrap is irreducibly complex
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 18
The Mousetrap
•A mousetrap cannot be built by natural selection
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 19
The Mousetrap – An Explanation
“An everyday example of an irreducibly complex system is the humble mousetrap. It consists of (1) a flat wooden platform or base; (2) a metal hammer, which crushes the mouse; (3) a spring with extended ends to power the hammer; (4) a catch that releases the spring; and (5) a metal bar that connects to the catch and holds the hammer back. You can't catch a mouse with just a platform, then add a spring and catch a few more mice, then add a holding bar and catch a few more. All the pieces have to be in place before you catch any mice.”
Michael Behe - 2002
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 20
“Irreducible Complexity” “By irreducibly complex I mean a single system
composed of several well-matched, interacting parts that contribute to the basic function, wherein the removal of any one of the parts causes the system to effectively cease functioning
An irreducibly complex system cannot be produced directly... by slight, successive modifications of a precursor system, because any precursor to an irreducibly complex system that is missing a part is by definition nonfunctional”
Michael Behe, Darwin’s Black Box, p. 39.
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 21
Johnson and Behe Meet the Press
Both Behe and Johnson began speaking and debating on major university campuses
Both also began writing articles and editorials for the WSJ, Washington Post and other major media outlets
Johnson appeared on Nightline
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 22
William Dembski Bill Dembski publishes
The Design Inference in 1999 with the prestigious Cambridge University Press.
Bill has earned doctorates in philosophy and mathematics and an M.Div. from Princeton.
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 23
1999 Is a Pivotal Year Kansas Board of Education reduces the
influence of naturalism in high schoolbiology standards
Education and scientific establishmentsvastly overreact
Johnson, Behe, Dembski, and others are published widely, exposing the naturalistic bias of science and media
Darwinists only repeat tired, predictable science vs. religion arguments
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 24
Year 2000
Dembski publishes Intelligent Design
Major conferences at Baylor, Concordia College in Wisconsin, and Yale
Media and scientific community focus even more attention on Kansas
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 25
Year 2000
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 26
Intelligent Design Theory Living organisms are too complicated to be the
result of natural processes working independently
Based largely on the theories underlying Information Theory
Concerned with measuring the complexity of structures/information contained in structures
Generally concerned with two main concepts: Irreducible complexity Specified complexity
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 27
Specific Complexity The following strings of characters illustrate the concept of
Specific Complexity.
Consider the following:
Complex but unspecified: “fjbn ghtur ieiod ofjkgjbn mfkritj”
Complex and specified: “The state of education in America”
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 28
Intelligent Design “Intelligent Design” (ID) takes intelligence
to be a separate principle, not reducible to chance and necessity
Targets evolution: life exhibits a special kind of order, not like that of a snowflake but like that of a meaningful message
Sophisticated anti-evolution No Bible-thumping Philosophical
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 29
ID: A Separate Principle
F Gm1m2
r122
++
Chance
Necessity
Design
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 30
“Irreducible Complexity”
1996: Michael Behe, Lehigh biochemist. Leading ID biologist. Catholic.
Common descent OK––against Darwinian mechanism. Can’t get “irreducible complexity.”
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 31
“Specified complexity”
1998-now: William Dembski, mathematician and philosopher. Leading theorist of ID.
ID irreducible form of explanation, distinct from chance & necessity.
ID is a revolution.
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 32
Books, Books, More Books
• Dembski has 3 books, 4+ edited books on ID
• Not just biology but physics, AI, theology, morality, law, …
• Broad, “information-theoretic” objections to naturalistic evolution
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 33
Dembski’s claims Both designed artifacts and organisms
exhibit special order: specified complexity Chance and necessity cannot generate
Specified Complexity, or information Intelligence is a separate principle Blind mechanisms (like those of Darwinian
evolution) cannot explain life Artificial Intelligence is impossible
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 34
How To Detect Specified Complexity
Contingency: No physical constraint; all sorts of strings can appear on the paper
Complexity: Improbable to obtain by pure chance
Specification: Can’t read it, but fits properties of a language, priorly known DNA also a code…
Günaydinlar! Bugün hava iyi,ancak yarin dahakötü olacak gibi.Bulut çok, ama neyapar, belli degil.
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 35
Testing for Design
Günaydinlar!
Bugün hava iyi,
ancak yarin daha
kötü olacak gibi.
Bulut çok, ama ne
yapar, belli degil.F G
m1m2
r12
contingency
contingency
complexity
specifi-
cation
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 36
NoNo
ChanceChance
NoNo
Specified/Small probability?
Specified/Small probability?
NoNo
Intermediateprobability?Intermediateprobability?
Highlyprobable?
Highlyprobable?
William Dembski’sExplanatory Filter
From Mere Creation: Science, Faith and Intelligent Design. William A. Dembski Ed. Downers Grove,
Illinois: InterVarsity Press, 1998. P99.
StartStart
LawLawYesYes
YesYes ChanceChance
YesYes DesignDesign
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 37
Is The Pattern Random Or Designed?Probability:
=2-256
=8.6 x 10-78
=0.0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000086
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 38
Is The Pattern Random Or Designed?Probability:
=2-256
=8.6 x 10-78
=0.0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000086
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 39
Arguments for a DesignerOrganisms look designed for at least three reasons: Redundancy - A Designer can engineer redundancy into a
system, but chance is unlikely to do this. An example of this is the presence of degeneracy in the genetic code and other features that minimize or negate the effects of many point mutations
Excess potential - Organisms have potential that may never be used. For example, Wallace, co-discoverer of natural selection, pointed out that primitive people have the capacity to do calculus when trained. Natural selection is unlikely to select for capacity that is not used
Complexity - Life exhibits a kind of complexity that it is hard to produce by processes involving chance
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 40
Design and Deductive Reasoning In general, arguments for a designer are
arguments against the alternative. This does not mean these are just arguments against evolutionary theory. All arguments, by definition, are characterized by taking one side while arguing against another side
Arguments against a theory are about eliminating possible explanations. There is nothing inferior about this, in fact, it is deductive reasoning which is used by scientists all the time in their quest for truth
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 41
The Likely and the Unlikely Arguments for a Designer frequently revolve
around probability. Meaningful complexity is unlikely to result from random events. Organisms are meaningfully complex. Some claim that natural selection overcomes much of this problem as, while change may be random, selection is not
Science is about predicting whatis likely and what is unlikely. Everyone is in agreement that the events leading to production of living organisms are unlikely
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 42
In a Long Time and Big Universe It has been argued that given massive lengths of time and a
universe to work in, the unlikely becomes likely: “Given infinite time, or infinite opportunities, anything is possible.
The large numbers proverbially furnished by astronomy, and the large time spans characteristic of geology, combine to turn topsy-turvy our everyday estimates of what is expected and what is miraculous.” Richard Dawkins (1989) The Blind Watchmaker: Why the evidence of evolution reveals a universe without design. W. W. Norton and Co. New York. p139.
Dawkins says that while life looks designed, the designer was not God, but massive chance coupled with natural selection. Nature was the designer
In The Panda’s Thumb, Stephen J. Gould argues that life does not look designed
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 43
Little or Big Changes? Not all changes improve fitness, they may:
Improve the fitness of an organism (very unlikely) Be neutral, having no effect on fitness Be detrimental, decreasing an organisms fitness (most likely)
The bigger the change the more likely it isto be significantly detrimental
Darwin argued that evolution is the accumulation of many small changes that improve fitness, big changes are unlikely to result in improved fitness.
“Many large groups of facts are intelligible only on the principle that species have been evolved by very small steps.” The Origin of Species Chapter VII under “Reasons for
disbelieving in great and abrupt modifications”
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 44
More Examples Necessity/law/order
Snowflake Crystal
Design – irreducible/specified complexity Animal cell Molecular motors Human eye Bombardier beetle
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 45
Molecular Machines Behe showed that the
cell, Darwin’s Black Box, is filled with irreducibly complex molecular machines that could not be built by natural selection
David Hume criticized Paley’s watchmaker argument because it was not an exact enough analogy
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 46
Molecular Machines (cont’d)
Over 100 molecular motors are now known to exist inside the cell with very specific analogies to human designed motors.
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 47
Behe’s Insight Michael Behe contends that when we look at the protein
machines that run cells, there is a point at which no parts can be removed and still have a functioning machine. He called these machines “irreducibly complex” (IC)
We encounter irreducibly complex devices in everyday life. A simple mouse trap is an example of an irreducibly complex device:
Board
HammerSpring
Trigger
Bait holder
CheeseStaple
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 48
Evolution of Complex Organs The Origin of Species
Chapter VI "Difficultiesof the Theory"
Organs of Extreme Perfectionand Complication “To suppose that the eye with all its inimitable
contrivances for adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light, and for the correcting of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest degree.”
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 49
Evolution of the Eye To go from nothing to an eye would be a
very big jump Darwin proposed a series of what appeared
to be relatively small steps (they are still gigantic leaps) that might be able to produce an eye
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 50
The Bombardier Beetle
Could this system evolve one step at a time? All of it is programmed in the beetle’s DNA. Unless all the parts are present, the whole system is useless. Even if all the parts were present, if any one of them did not work right, the beetle’s ancestors might have exploded!
An ordinary looking beetlewith an extraordinary defense mechanism
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 51
Intelligent Design (ID) Uses an “explanatory filter”
Necessity – did it have to happen? Chance – did it happen by accident? Design – did an intelligent agent cause it to
happen? ID theory focuses on what is designed
without answering the questions of who, when, why and how
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 52
Some ID Observations ID confronts naturalistic philosophical
underpinnings of evolutionary thinking ID identifies presuppositions of naturalism ID is supported by science ID does not assume young universe ID is not Creationism ID does not mention the Fall
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 53
Issues with Intelligent Design ID does not attempt to explain all designs
Only certain features are designed Does not rule out evolutionary processes
ID does not oppose an old age for the earth ID does not acknowledge God as redeemer ID distances itself from the problem of evil ID movement does not identify Designer/Creator ID divorces the Creator from creation
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 54
Closing Thoughts on ID
Alternative theory to Darwinian Evolution? Alternative to Creationism? Should it be taught in public schools?
Critical thinking is needed Presuppositions must be stated Church-state issue? Academic freedom is at stake
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 55
The Latest From Kansas
The Kansas standards say there is a lack of evidence or natural explanation for the genetic code, charge that fossil records are inconsistent with evolutionary theory, and say certain evolutionary explanations "often reflect ... inferences from indirect or circumstantial evidence."
Reuters News Story, August 2, 2006
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 56
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 57
Thank you for your
attention!
Dr. Heinz Lycklama
www.osta.com
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 58
Creation Organizations ICR – Institute for Creation Research
www.icr.org Books by Henry Morris (founder), e.g.
The Genesis Flood The Genesis Record The Modern Creation Trilogy
Acts and Facts articles on Creation Answers in Genesis
www.answersingenesis.org Founded by Ken Ham Books, seminars, articles on Creation
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 59
Creation Organizations - 2 Creation Evidence Museum
www.creationevidence.org Dinosaurs and human tracks
Creation Moments www.creationmoments.com Radio spots
Creation Research Society www.creationresearch.org Publication of peer-reviewed creation articles
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 60
Creation Organizations - 3 Center For Scientific Creation
www.creationscience.com “In The Beginning” Book by Walt Brown, Ph.D.
Creation Science Evangelism www.drdino.com Videos, seminars
Discovery Institute www.discovery.org Intelligent Design “Think Tank”
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 61
Important Books The Genesis Record, Dr. Henry Morris The Genesis Flood, Dr. John Whitcomb & Dr. Henry Morris The Collapse of Evolution, Scott Huse The Lie: Evolution, Ken Ham Refuting Evolution, Dr. Jonathan Sarfati Evolution: The Fossils Still Say No!, Dr. Duane Gish Scientific Creationism, Dr. Henry Morris Dinosaurs by Design, Dr. Duane Gish Genetic Entropy & the Mystery of the Genome, Dr. J.C.
Sanford
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 62
More Important Books The Young Earth, Dr. John Morris Science and the Bible, Dr. Henry Morris Tornado in a Junkyard, James Perloff In The Beginning, Dr. Walt Brown Evolution: A Theory in Crisis, Michael Denton Darwin on Trial, Dr. Phillip Johnson Darwin’s Black Box, Dr. Michael Behe Design Inference, Dr. William Dembski Icons of Evolution, Dr. Jonathan Wells
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 63
Yet More Important Books The Battle for the Beginning, Dr. John MacArthur Total Truth, Nancy Pearcey The Design Revolution, Dr. William Demski The Origin of Species Revisited, W. R. Bird It Matters What We Believe, Mike Riddle The Evolution of a Creationist, Jobe Martin Grand Canyon (a different view), Tom Vail In Six Days, Dr. John Ashton Starlight and Time, Dr. Russell Humphreys Starlight, Time and the New Physics, De. John Hartnett
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 64
Backup Slides
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 65
Certain bacteria swim by means of rotary flagella. These are driven by reversible electric motors!
Certain bacteria swim by means of rotary flagella. These are driven by reversible electric motors!
Bacterial Motors
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 66
Bacterial Motors - 2
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 67
IC Protein Machines Cells are full of irreducibly complex (IC) devices -
little protein machines that work only if all the parts (proteins) are present and arranged correctly
Natural selection does not provide a plausible mechanism to get from nothing to the collection of parts necessary to run a number of irreducibly complex protein machines vital to living cells
Evolution of these protein machines must occur in single big steps, not gradually, as to be selected a protein must be functional in some way. Each protein machine is fairly complex, thus evolution in a single step seems unlikely
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 68
Cilia and Flagella Cilia and Flagella are examples of irreducibly
complex protein machines Both cilia and flagella are found in the simplest
eukaryotic organisms, single celled protists, as well as much more complex animals. Some members of the plant kingdom also have flagella
As complicated structures are thought to have evolved only once, evolutionary theory suggests flagella evolved in a very ancient common ancestor of modern plant and animal cells
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 69
Components of Flagella and Cilia Flagella and cilia are made of a number of different
protein components: Three types of microtubuals - singlet, doublet, and
triplet - composed of and tubulin Nexin to separate the tubuals Protein spokes connecting tubuals to maintain a
constant diameter Spoke heads Dynein arms that interact with adjacent microtubuals A basal plate
Each of these components must be present if the flagella or cilia is to work.
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 70
Flagella Parts
Central microtubuals
Microtubual doublet Plasma
membrane
Dynein armsRadial spokes
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 71
Are Little Jumps Possible? Cilia or flagella, missing any single part will not bend, they
are thus irreducibly complex Parts having functions enhancing fitness independent of a
role in locomotion, after developing some functionality, could evolve via random change and natural selection
Microtubuals are an important part of the cytoskeleton of all eukaryotic cells, thus they could evolve independently
No other protein components of cilia and flagella have known functions independent of their role in movement
Thus, all proteins, other than tubulin in microtubuals, would have to spontaneously come into existence simultaneously if they were to increase fitness and be selected.
That seems like a big jump!
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 72
There Is More Cilia and flagella represent the tip of the iceberg
of our current understanding of the little machines that make up cells. Our current understanding of how cells function is still fragmentary, but even in this limited set of knowledge, numerous examples of irreducible complexity exist
Irreducible complexity at the biochemical level represents a powerful challenge to the theory that natural selection can account for the origin of modern living organisms