nps archaeology
2016/1313
St George’s Court, Globe Street, Methwold, Norfolk, IP26 4PQ
Archaeological Trial Trench Evaluation
Prepared for: Windsor Architectural
ENF 139988
March 2016
SUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL
nps archaeology
QUALITY ASSURANCE
Job Number 01-04-16-2-1313
Overview Andrew Crowson
Draft John Ames 09.03.2016
Graphics David Dobson 10.03.2016
Edit Andrew Crowson 11.03.2016
Review David Adams 14.03.2016
Issue 1
John Ames MCIfA Author, digitising
Sue Anderson BA MPhil MCIfA FSA Scot Pottery
Julie Curl HND ACIfA Animal bone and shell
Rebecca Sillwood BA, ACIfA Finds recording, metal finds
Louise Weetman BA Finds processing
Disclaimer This document has been prepared in good faith on the basis of information available at the date of publication without any independent verification for the exclusive use and benefit of the named client and for the sole purpose for which it is provided. NPS Archaeology does not guarantee the accuracy, reliability, completeness, or currency of the content of this document nor its usefulness in achieving any purpose. This document is not intended to nor should it be relied upon by any third party. NPS Archaeology accepts no responsibility nor liability should this document be used for any alternative purpose other than for which it is intended nor to any third party. NPS Archaeology will not be liable for any loss, damage, cost, or expense incurred or arising by reason of any person using or relying on information in this document.
nps archaeology Scandic House 85 Mountergate Norwich NR1 1PY T 01603 756150 F 01603 756190 E [email protected] W nau.nps.co.uk © NPS Archaeology Ltd 2016, all rights reserved
SUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL
nps archaeology St George’s Court, Globe Street, Methwold, Norfolk Archaeological Trial Trench Evaluation
Contents
Summary ........................................................................................................ 1
Introduction.............................................................................................................. 1
Project Background ......................................................................................... 1
Planning Background ...................................................................................... 1
Geology and Topography ........................................................................................ 3
Geology .......................................................................................................... 3
Topography ..................................................................................................... 3
Archaeological and Historical Background .............................................................. 4
Sources ........................................................................................................... 4
HER data ........................................................................................................ 4
Methodology ............................................................................................................ 7
Objectives ....................................................................................................... 7
Methods .......................................................................................................... 7
Archive ............................................................................................................ 8
Results .................................................................................................................. 10
Trench 1 ........................................................................................................ 10
Trench 2 ........................................................................................................ 16
Trench 3 ........................................................................................................ 18
Trench 4 ........................................................................................................ 23
Trench 5 ........................................................................................................ 26
Archaeological Finds ............................................................................................. 31
Pottery .......................................................................................................... 31
Metal Finds ................................................................................................... 32
Faunal Remains ............................................................................................ 33
Environmental Remains ........................................................................................ 36
Discussion ............................................................................................................. 37
Acknowledgements ....................................................................................... 38
Bibliography and Sources ............................................................................. 39
Appendix 1a: Context Summary ................................................................... 40
Appendix 2a: Finds by Context ..................................................................... 43
Appendix 2b: Finds Summary ....................................................................... 43
Appendix 3: Pottery Catalogue ..................................................................... 43
Appendix 4: Animal Bone Catalogue ............................................................ 44
Appendix 5: Historical and Archaeological Periods ....................................... 45
SUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL
nps archaeology St George’s Court, Globe Street, Methwold, Norfolk Archaeological Trial Trench Evaluation
Appendix 6: OASIS Report Summary .......................................................... 46
Appendix 7: Archaeological Specification .................................................... 50
SUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL
nps archaeology St George’s Court, Globe Street, Methwold, Norfolk Archaeological Trial Trench Evaluation
Figures
Figure 1 Site location with selected HER data
Figure 2 Location of trenches
Figure 3 Trench 1, plan
Figure 4 Trench 1, sections 1-9
Figure 5 Trench 2, plan and sections 1-2
Figure 6 Trench 3, plan
Figure 7 Trench 3, sections 1-3
Figure 8 Trench 4, plan and section 1
Figure 9 Trench 5, plan
Figure 10 Trench 5, sections 1-8
Plates
Cover View of the site, looking southwest
Plate 1. General shot of the site, looking southeast
Plate 2. Trench 1. Ditches 28 and 30, looking north
Plate 3. Trench 3. Post-hole 52 and ditches 50, 58 and 60, looking southeast
Plate 4. Trench 3. Showing chalk deposit 64, looking south
Plate 5. Trench 4. West-facing section north end
Plate 6. Trench 4. Sondage 70, looking west
Plate 7. Trench 5. Ditches 13 and 15, looking south
Tables
Table 1 Site archive quantification
Table 2 Pottery quantification by fabric
Table 3 Pottery distribution by context
Table 4 Quantification of the faunal assemblage by context number, spot date, weight in grams and fragment count
Table 5 Quantification of the faunal assemblage by context, species and NISP
Table 6 Quantification of the shell assemblage by context and species
SUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL
SUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL
nps archaeology St George’s Court, Globe Street, Methwold, Norfolk Archaeological Trial Trench Evaluation
Page 1
Client: Windsor Architectural
Location: St George’s Court, Globe Street, Methwold, Norfolk
District: King’s Lynn and West Norfolk
Planning Reference: N/A
Grid Reference: TL 73015 95006
HER No.: ENF 139988
OASIS ID: norfolka1a-242138
Dates of Fieldwork: 15-18 February 2016
Summary
NPS Archaeology was commissioned by Windsor Architectural on behalf of Mulberry Tree Homes Ltd to carry out archaeological trial trench evaluation ahead of planned construction of residential housing at St George’s Court, off Globe Street, Methwold, Norfolk (TL 73015, 95006).
The proposed development site encompasses an area of 0.42 ha. Five trial trenches were situated to provide a c. 5% sample of the site. The archaeological works took place on 15 to 18 February 2016.
The trenches revealed an arrangement of inter-cut ditches, pits and post-holes, some of which were of 9th-11th-century date and others of 11th-14th-century date. Although there was limited evidence for settlement occupation at the site, Late Saxon pottery and artefacts of medieval and post-medieval date suggest that activity had occurred within the vicinity of the site intermittently across several centuries.
It is considered likely that the evidence recovered situates the evaluation site on the north edge of a shrunken medieval village, known from surrounding fields by earthworks of tofts, enclosures and fishponds.
SUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL
nps archaeology St George’s Court, Globe Street, Methwold, Norfolk Archaeological Trial Trench Evaluation
Page 3
INTRODUCTION
Figure 1
Project Background
1 A proposal to construct residential housing with associated parking to be known as St George’s Court, at Globe Street in Methwold, Norfolk (TL 73015 95006) required a programme of archaeological works to support it through the planning process.
2 NPS Archaeology was commissioned by Windsor Architectural and funded by Mulberry Tree Homes Ltd to carry out the archaeological work.
3 At the time of the work the evaluation site was under grass. It is situated on the western fringe of the historic core of Methwold and encompasses c. 0.42ha.
4 The archaeological brief (Hamilton 2012, updated Dack 2015) notes that the evaluation site is situated within an area with high archaeological potential.
5 There are no records of previously identified archaeological remains at the site, although fishponds, enclosures and other earthwork features of suspected medieval date are noted to the southwest and west of the site. These earthworks may extend into the proposed development site.
6 Other known archaeological assets in the vicinity of the site include prehistoric flint tools, the site of an Iron Age-Roman settlement, a possible Late Anglo-Saxon foundation church, and a supposed medieval castle or hall.
7 The evaluation comprised five trial trenches, consisting of 3no. 20.00m x 1.60m, 1no. 1.00m x 1.60m, and 1no. 10.00m x 1.60m.
Planning Background
8 The current work was undertaken to fulfil planning conditions set by Kings Lynn and West Norfolk District Council and a Brief for Archaeological Evaluation by Trial Trenching issued by Norfolk Historic Environment Service (NHES) (Hamilton 2012, updated Dack 2015). The work was conducted in accordance with a Written Scheme of Investigation prepared by NPS Archaeology (01-04-16-2-1313/Hobbs 2016).
9 The programmer of work was designed to assist in defining the character and extent of any archaeological remains within the proposed development area, following principles set out in National Planning Policy Framework (Department for Communities and Local Government 2012).
10 The results of the evaluation will enable decisions to be made by the Local Planning Authority about the treatment of any archaeological remains found.
11 The recipients of this report will be Windsor Architectural, NHES and King’s Lynn and West Norfolk District Council.
SUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL
Thornham Farm
H
o
g
g
a
r
d
'
s
D
i
k
e
(
T
r
a
c
k
)
Pond
Pond
Tanks
Farm
Sycamore
Sycamore Farm
T
H
O
R
N
H
A
M
R
O
A
D
Elden's Lane (T
rack)
D
r
a
i
n
D
ra
in
1
1
a
1
7
6
7
11.0m
Path
(um
)
Elden's Lane (T
rack)
Hall Farm
D
ra
in
Fish Pond
Fishpond
6
1
P
a
t
h
(
u
m
)
Pond
ELD
EN
'S
LA
NE
1
9
10
P
a
t
h
(
u
m
)
Drain
P
a
t
h
(
u
m
)
P
a
t
h
(
u
m
)
P
a
t
h
(
u
m
)
Hall Farm
Bungalow
1
1
8
8
7.6m
B
1
1
1
2
14
3
5
GP
Methwold
B
1
1
1
2
House
3
6
9.9m
1
The
Beeches
5
3
0
3
7
2
3
8
8
3
4
H
Y
T
H
E
R
O
A
D
Dalkieth
B
M
1
1
.
3
2
m
T
h
e
B
a
r
n
H
O
L
M
E
S
'S
L
A
N
E
Stone
Pond
Meadow
4.9m
BM 6.23m
2
6
View
Well
Stone
High School
Methwold
2
2
2
0
1
9
1
8
1
4
2
1
Cara Cottage
Holmebrink Farm
1
2
3
Well
1
Well
9
7.6m
5
4
1
1
5
0
Tennis Courts
4
0
5
1
5
7
4
1
G
L
O
B
E
S
T
R
E
E
T
4
6
3
6
a
3
2
2
8
3
8
3
6
2
9
3
5
1
1
.
1
m
G
L
O
B
E
St George's
Church
P
a
th
Recreation Ground
(site of)
Old Hall
Vicarage
2
1
1
5
7
1
1
5
MARKET
PLACE
S
T
R
E
E
T
1
7
F
a
i
r
v
i
e
w
P
a
t
h
1
2
2
0
1
6
8
Lancaster Park
Pump
C
R
O
W
NS
T
R
E
E
T
1
9
2
7
Pavilion
11.6m
Vicarage
2
6
2
1
P
O
The
Old
2
15.87m
BM
PW
CH
AP
EL LA
NE
Cross
(remains of)
4b
1
4
1
1
Sun
Sch
1
5
.5
m
7
3
9
7
T
ra
c
k
Allotment Gardens
Well
1
9
2
1
11
1
5
Rooms
(PH)
2
6
The
Hall
B 1112
2
16.4m
3
0
1
72
4
George
GP
16.0m
Auction
6
T
C
B
H
I
G
H
S
T
R
E
E
T
LB
4
2
2
1
2
7
Methwold
Club
2
4
0
C
H
A
L
K
W
A
Y
1
7
Track
5
5
6
3
6
4
6
1
57
Hythe Court
4
3
4
6
2
3
3
4
0
52
B
M
6
.5
2
m
4
2
6.4m
B
1
1
1
2
2
7
Haymeadow
Barn
3
4
2
8
6.8m
1
3
BM 7.44m
GP
1
0
Pond
1
8
Cloughs Farm
7
1
0
5
2
1
4
6
V
E
N
T
U
R
A
C
L
O
S
E
El Sub Sta
3
1
8
24
7
28
V C School
6
1
0
6
O
L
D
F
E
L
T
W
E
L
L
R
O
A
D
4
2
3
6
7
10
3
1
1
2
T
R
E
N
T
V
C
C
L
O
S
E
3
0
B
U
N
T
I
N
G
'
S
L
A
N
E
4
1
3
3
3
1
9
1
7
11
2
3
2
5
3
3
31
3
4
House
P
a
t
h
Bramley
3
5
Farm
Prospect
45351
4790
4941
4887
4935
4888
6424
6415
ENF 139988
32250
24980
23669
36370
23668
23685
© Crown copyright and database rights 2016 Ordnance Survey 100019340
Figure 1. Site location with selected HER data. Scale 1:5000
N
500m0
SUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL
nps archaeology St George’s Court, Globe Street, Methwold, Norfolk Archaeological Trial Trench Evaluation
Page 3
GEOLOGY AND TOPOGRAPHY
Geology
12 Solid geology in the area of the proposed development site at Globe Street consists of Zig–Zag Chalk Formation, a sedimentary bedrock formed up to 94–100 million years ago in the Cretaceous period in a local environment dominated by warm chalk seas (British Geological Survey 2016).
13 The chalk is overlain by superficial deposits of Head (a mix of clay, silt, sand and gravel). The Head deposits formed up to 3 million years ago in the Quaternary period in a local environment dominated by subaerial slopes (British Geological Survey 2016).
Topography
14 Methwold is situated on the southeast edge of the Fenland Basin, and the parish straddles chalk upland in the east and present and former peat fens in the west.
15 The village occupies a point at the very edge of the upland and is located c. 14.50km southeast of Downham Market, 16.50km southwest of Swaffham c. 17.50km northwest of Thetford, and 23km northeast of Ely.
16 The development site constitutes an almost rectangular parcel of land c. 0.42ha in area that is bounded by housing to the east and open grassland to the south and west. To the north of the site are allotment gardens.
17 The site occupies relatively flat ground ranging between 5.35m OD to the south, 5.49m OD to the north and 5.81m OD to the east.
Plate 1. General view of site, looking southeast
SUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL
nps archaeology St George’s Court, Globe Street, Methwold, Norfolk Archaeological Trial Trench Evaluation
Page 4
ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL BACKGROUND
Sources
18 Methwold and its environs have a rich history, represented by evidence from prehistory through to modern times. Some periods, in particular the prehistoric, Roman and medieval periods are well represented in the archaeological and historical record, whilst evidence of other periods, notably the Iron Age and Anglo-Saxon periods, is more ephemeral, consisting of isolated finds of pottery and metalwork.
19 The primary source for archaeological evidence in the county of Norfolk is the Norfolk Historic Environment Record (HER), which details archaeological discoveries and sites of historical interest. In order to characterise the likely archaeological potential of the development site, HER record data was purchased from Norfolk Historic Environment Record for a 500m radius around the site centred on TL 73015 95006.
20 A reference table listing dates for historical and archaeological periods described in this report is provided in Appendix 5.
HER data
21 The HER data that are most relevant, or are closest to the current site are summarised and referenced below in broad chronological order, along with details of previous archaeological work in the vicinity. The records that are located in closest proximity to the development site are shown in Figure 1. The information presented that is sourced from Norfolk Historic Environment Record remains copyright of Norfolk County Council.
Prehistoric
22 A possible Neolithic axehead and a small Bronze Age axehead were recovered from Methwold churchyard (HER 4887). A handful of prehistoric worked flints and pottery was collected to the west of the evaluation site in 1987 (HER 23668, 23669).
Iron Age
23 Iron Age gullies and pits containing domestic waste including pots, a loom weight and a crucible were recovered by an excavation in 1988. The excavation site lies c. 300m northeast of the proposed development site (HER 4790). Iron Age pottery has also been found on the surface of arable fields to the northwest of the site, along with worked and burnt flint (HER 23685).
Roman
24 Alongside the evidence for Iron Age activity from the excavation noted above, Roman-period finds from the same location indicate a settlement of this date. Conjectural evidence for a villa and building include finds of hypocaust, pottery, wall painting and silver metal working debris (HER 4790).
25 A chalk pit southeast of the parish church and 600m southeast of the site produced a Roman brooch and terracotta (HER 4888). Roman pottery has been collected to the northwest of the evaluation site amongst material of other periods (HER 23685).
SUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL
nps archaeology St George’s Court, Globe Street, Methwold, Norfolk Archaeological Trial Trench Evaluation
Page 5
Anglo-Saxon
A possible post-Conquest church lies c. 380m south of the proposed development site (HER 6415). Its exact location remains uncertain as reports from 1888 locate it only as “opposite the school in The Buntings”. A separate account relates the discovery of post-Conquest church foundations and Perpendicular-style capital bases recovered from beneath the remains of a “Stuart mansion”. Excavations at the site in the 1980s recovered sherds of pottery suggesting activity here in the 12th–13th centuries.
Medieval
26 In the field to the west, adjacent to the evaluation site, rectangular-shaped earthworks and perhaps earthworks of other, smaller features are known (HER 32250). The main earthwork is aligned approximately east–west and measures c. 60.00m x 40.00m. There are no records of the earthworks being examined archaeologically, and their interpretation is as either a medieval moated site, or else as a fishpond. Prior to 1974, the earthworks are not indicated on Ordnance Survey maps, but from 1974 the principal rectangular earthwork is marked as Fish Pond in gothic script. It is noted, and it may be coincidence, that modern boundaries within the evaluation site follow the position and alignment of the east–west arms of the earthwork.
27 To the south of the evaluation site, the extensive earthwork (and cropmark) remains of a shrunken medieval village have been recorded from aerial photographs, observations and field survey (HER 24980). The remains extend for 400m in a line southwest from the evaluation site boundary and encompass an area approaching 5ha. The earthworks are visible as a series of rectangular banked and ditched enclosures (amongst other features, including a probable former watercourse) and are interpreted as fishponds and medieval tofts. The tofts represent small property divisions that would have included a house and a small portion of adjoining arable land or garden. Comparable earthworks have been surveyed at Hockwold, 6km to the south, and the shrinkage of the formerly prosperous medieval village there is charted in documents of the 15th–17th centuries (Cushion and Davison 2003, 6); a similar picture of steady desertion can be envisaged here at Methwold.
28 The ground plan of the possible site of a medieval castle, or hall has been identified from cropmarks showing on aerial photographs of Methwold Recreation Ground. Surrounding features including fishponds are also visible, and some remains were reportedly still upstanding in the 19th century. The hall site lies c. 160m southeast of the proposed development site (HER 4935). It is marked on all editions of Ordnance Survey maps from 1885–1974 as Old Hall (site of), after which time it is no longer indicated.
29 Low densities of pottery finds from fields to the west of the evaluation site indicate a wider background of medieval activity in the area and perhaps the extent of land under cultivation at that time (HER 23668, 23669, 23685.
30 The parish church of St George is Perpendicular in style and mostly dates to the 14th century, although the base of the church appears to be older (HER 4941). The church is renowned for its fine carvings in the roof. The church lies c. 270m southeast of the proposed development site.
SUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL
nps archaeology St George’s Court, Globe Street, Methwold, Norfolk Archaeological Trial Trench Evaluation
Page 6
Post-medieval
31 Cropmarks recorded from aerial photographs of two rectangular enclosures situated to the west of the shrunken village remains described by HER 24980, are thought to represent ditched features associated with post-medieval activity at nearby Hall Farm (HER 36370). It remains possible that they are further elements of the medieval landscape, however. Features which are considered likely to represent the enclosures are shown on the Tithe map of the area dated to c. 1840–50 (Norfolk County Council 2016).
32 A 15th-century timber-framed jettied house is located c. 315m to the southeast of the evaluation site (HER 6424). The house has 16th- and 17th-century additions with very ornate detailing. The south range of the house is 18th century in date and built of clunch. Other early post-medieval buildings are located close by.
33 William Faden’s map of Norfolk in 1797 shows the location of the site at the eastern tip of Methwold Common (Macnair 2016). The common is substantial, plainly an intake of peat fen (which persists to its west and south), but not yet enclosed by larger land holdings. Notably, however, the common, which otherwise has a generally smooth, flowing boundary, has an abrupt, stepped and angular edge where it borders the land immediately north of the evaluation site. This is taken to represent the boundary (perhaps an intake from the common) of property potentially associated with the medieval lands described by the old hall, earthworks and tofts. The outline shown by Faden is still recognisable in the layout of roads and field boundaries today, which have grown up around and fossilised the ancient property boundary.
Modern
34 RAF Methwold was built as a satellite airfield to RAF Feltwell in 1939 (HER 4937). The surviving concrete runways were installed in 1944, though the airfield was closed at the end of the War in 1945. Monuments associated with the airfield include an aircraft hangar and aircraft obstructions, likely anti-glider ditches. The south edge of the site has a well-preserved battle headquarters and some gun pits, along with a number of air raid shelters. .
35 On 6 January 1942 at 05.20 hrs a Wellington bomber taking off from RAF Methwold crashed at Holme Brink Farm. The crash site is 300m from the evaluation site (HER 45351).
SUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL
nps archaeology St George’s Court, Globe Street, Methwold, Norfolk Archaeological Trial Trench Evaluation
Page 7
METHODOLOGY
Figure 2
General
36 Methodology for the evaluation followed the agreed Written Scheme of Investigation (01-04-16-2-1313/Hobbs 2015), where the mitigation strategy for the works is presented in full (Appendix 7).
37 Archaeological procedures conformed to guidelines issued by the Chartered Institute for Archaeologists (CIfA 2014a) and the evaluation was conducted within the context of the relevant regional archaeological framework (Medlycott 2011).
Objectives
38 The objective of the evaluation was to determine as far as reasonably possible the presence or absence, location, nature, extent, date, quality, condition and significance of any surviving archaeological deposits within the development area.
39 The archaeological project aimed to provide appropriate and adequate data to permit informed decisions regarding any requirement for future archaeological mitigation work at St George’s Court, Globe Street, Methwold and to make the results of the work accessible.
Methods
40 The sample required by the Brief for Archaeological Evaluation resulted in the excavation of five trial trenches in the area of the planned development. The siting of trenches followed the overall layout shown in the Written Scheme of Investigation (01-04-16-2-1313/Hobbs 2016), but the exact length varied slightly due to ground conditions.
41 Trenches were located in relation to the Ordnance Survey National Grid. Site survey was carried out by NPS Land Survey using a Leica GPS9000 surveying system.
42 The temporary benchmarks that were used during the course of the work were placed at either end of the trenches and transferred from the Leica GPS9000 surveying station with the highest value of 6.27m OD recorded in the southeast part of the site, and the lowest value of 5.35m OD in the south.
43 Prior to mechanical excavation, each trench location was scanned with a CAT to check for buried services. The areas to be stripped of topsoil were examined for surface features and for archaeological artefacts prior to any excavation.
44 Machine excavation was carried out by a hydraulic 360˚ excavator equipped with a toothless ditching bucket. All mechanical excavation was constantly and directly monitored by a suitably experienced archaeologist. Machining was halted at the first identifiable archaeological deposits or natural geology.
45 All trench surfaces revealed by machine were hand-cleaned and any archaeological deposits were excavated by hand. Upon completion of the work all trenches were backfilled by machine.
46 Spoil, exposed surfaces and features were scanned with a metal-detector. All metal-detected and hand-collected finds, other than those that were evidently modern,
SUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL
nps archaeology St George’s Court, Globe Street, Methwold, Norfolk Archaeological Trial Trench Evaluation
Page 8
were retained for examination. All retained finds were identified by context number to a specific deposit and were processed and recorded in line with relevant guidelines for archaeological finds (CIfA 2014b).
47 All archaeological features and deposits were recorded using NPS Archaeology pro forma. Trench locations, plans and sections were recorded at appropriate scales. Monochrome 35mm negatives and digital photographs were taken of all relevant archaeological features and deposits where appropriate.
48 Site conditions were good and the work took place in fine weather with good access to the trenches.
49 All site work was undertaken with respect to Health and Safety provision. Hard hats, high-visibility vests and steel toe-capped boots were worn by all staff at all times.
Archive
50 The site archive is currently held at the offices of NPS Archaeology. Upon completion of the project, the documentary archive will be prepared and indexed following guidelines obtained from the relevant Museum and relevant national guidelines (CIfA 2014c). The archive, consisting of all paper elements created during recording of the archaeological site, including digital material, will be deposited with Norfolk Museums Service
51 Subject to written consent and donation by the landowner, all archaeological finds recovered by the current work will be deposited with Norfolk Museums Service.
52 A summary form of the results of this project has been completed for Online AccesS to the Index of archaeological investigationS (OASIS) under the reference norfolka1-, and this report will be uploaded to the OASIS database.
53 The contents of the site archive are summarised in Table 1.
Item Quantity.
Contexts 73
Files/paper record sheets 1/81
Plan and section sheets 8
Photographs 1 x 35mm monochrome film; 106 digital images
Finds 25
Table 1. Site archive quantification
SUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL
Trench 1
Trench 2
Trench 3
Trench 4
Trench 5
© Crown copyright and database rights 2016 Ordnance Survey 100019340
Figure 2. Location of trenches. Scale 1:400
N
0 40m
SUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL
nps archaeology St George’s Court, Globe Street, Methwold, Norfolk Archaeological Trial Trench Evaluation
Page 10
RESULTS
54 The results for each Trench are tabulated below in numerical order. A photograph of each trench accompanies the trench description with additional images of features presented where appropriate.
55 Plans are provided for each trench along with section drawings of excavated features and the sequence of deposits.
Trench 1
Figures 2, 3 and 4; Plate 2
Location
Orientation North–south
North end 573001, 295030
South end 572997, 295010
Dimensions
Length 20.00m
Width 1.60m
Depth 0.70m
Levels
North top 5.49m OD
South top 5.48m OD
Context Type Description and Interpretation Thickness
01 Deposit Mid-greyish brown silty sand 0.60m
02 Deposit Light grey chalky sandy clay 0.10m
28 Cut North–south aligned ditch 0.18m
29 Deposit Fill of 28 0.18m
30 Cut North–south aligned ditch 0.36m
31 Deposit Fill of 30 0.36m
32 Cut North–south aligned ditch 0.22m
33 Deposit Fill of 32 0.22m
34 Cut East–west aligned ditch 0.30m
35 Deposit Fill of 34 0.30m
36 Cut Post-hole 0.20m
37 Deposit Fill of 36 0.20m
38 Cut East–west aligned ditch 0.12m
39 Deposit Fill of 38 0.12m
40 Cut Northeast–southwest aligned ditch 0.15m
SUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL
nps archaeology St George’s Court, Globe Street, Methwold, Norfolk Archaeological Trial Trench Evaluation
Page 11
Trench 1
41 Deposit Fill of 40 0.15m
42 Cut Post-hole or small pit 0.10m
43 Deposit Fill of 42 0.10m
44 Cut ?Pit 0.35m
45 Deposit Fill of 44 0.35m
46 Cut East–west aligned ditch 0.20m
47 Deposit Fill of 46 0.20m
48 Cut East–west aligned ditch 0.20m
49 Deposit Fill of 48 0.20m
74 U/S Unstratified finds
Discussion
Trench 1 was located in the west of the site. The trench was excavated to natural deposits at 0.70m below the ground surface between 5.92m OD (north end) and 5.48m OD (south end). The overburden above geological mid-greyish white chalk consisted of homogeneous mid-greyish brown silty sand topsoil 01 and mid-grey chalky clayey sand subsoil 02 (Fig. 4, section 4).
The trench contained six ditches 28, 30, 32, 34, 38, 40 and 46=48, a rounded feature 44, a post-hole 36 and a probable post-hole or small pit 42 (Figs 3 and 4, sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9). Two excavated sections in 32 and 44 produced a total of four pottery sherds, of which two were late 9th–10th-century (32) and two were sherds of late 12th–14th-century pottery (44). A single sherd of 11th–12th-century pottery was recovered from an unstratified context 74, as well as a medieval buckle plate (SF2) and a possible post-medieval pewter buckle (SF1).
A north–south aligned feature ran from the north to the central part of the trench over a distance of c. 11.00m, where it joined an east-west aligned ditch feature. The north end of the feature occupied the entire width of the trench. To the south it became narrow, whilst its east edge was outside the east limit of excavation. A section placed across the widest, north part revealed two ditches 28 and 30 (Plate 2).
Plate 2. Trench 1. Ditches 28 and 30, looking north
SUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL
nps archaeology St George’s Court, Globe Street, Methwold, Norfolk Archaeological Trial Trench Evaluation
Page 12
Trench 1
The west ditch 28 was 0.56m wide x 0.18m deep, with gradually sloping sides and a concave base. The excavated portion of the east ditch 30 revealed that it was at least 0.65m wide x 0.30m deep, with a gradually sloping west edge (Fig. 4, section 1). Both ditches contained similar fills 29 and 31 consisting of light grey clay with chalk flecks. No finds were recovered from the features.
In plan, it appears that ditch 28 may terminate close to the north end of the trench. The feature that continues southwards is thought likely to be 30 alone.
At the south end of ditch 30 (where it was recorded as 32), it intersected with an east–west ditch 34. Although excavation could not conclusively establish the sequence of construction of the two ditches, the section of the west-facing trench side suggested that ditch 34 truncated ditch 32 (Fig. 4, section 2).
The excavated segment of ditch 32 measured 0.65m wide x 0.22m deep, with a gradual sloping west edge and contained a single fill of light grey clay with chalk and flint inclusions 33. Two sherds of pottery were recovered from fill 33. One sherd was Late Saxon Thetford-type ware dated to the late 9th–11th century, and the other sherd was Grimston-type green- glazed pottery dated to the late 12th–14th century. A single bone fragment of a metatarsal from a neonatal equid was also recovered. No butchering evidence was present on the bone and it may be possible that the foal represented was a natural still birth.
Ditch 34 was aligned east–west, though it had slightly curving edges. Ditch 34 measured 1.60–1.80m wide x 0.30m deep, with gradually sloping sides and a predominantly flattish base (Fig. 4, section 2). The fill was of firm, mid-greyish brown clay with occasional flint 35. No finds were recovered from the feature.
A single post-hole 36 was recorded north of 34 and west of 30=32 in the central part of the trench. Post-hole 36 was 0.36m in diameter x 0.16m deep, with gradual sloping sides and a concave base (Fig. 4, section 9). No finds were recovered from the light grey sandy clay fill 37.
To the south of ditch 34 and parallel to it, there was another east–west ditch 38. Ditch 38 measured 1.10m wide x 0.12m deep, with gradually sloping sides and an undulating base which rose in the central part to give the appearance of two slightly concave bases (Fig. 4, section 4). No finds were recovered from its mid greyish brown silty sand fill 35.
A group of four features was located south of ditch 38.
A section was excavated across a northeast–southwest ditch 40 and a probable post-hole or small pit 42 to identify any relationship between the two features. The excavated portion of ditch 40 demonstrated that it was 0.60m wide x 0.16m deep, with gently sloping sides and a concave base (Fig. 4, section 5). No finds were recovered from its mid-brownish grey sandy clay fill 41. To the immediate south of ditch 40 post-hole or small pit 42 was only partially revealed within the trench. The excavated section shows that the feature was 0.40m wide x 0.10m deep, with gently sloping side and a concave base (Fig. 4, section 5). The fill consisted of mid-greyish brown sandy clay 43. No finds were recovered from the post-hole or pit feature and no relationship was established between it and ditch 40.
The south-most features consisted of an east–west ditch 46=48 and a rounded feature 44 roughly aligned north–south. A section was excavated against the east trench side to gain a full profile of ditch 46 (Fig. 4, section 6). The excavated portion of ditch 46 measured 0.35m long x 0.70m wide x 0.20m deep, with gradually sloping sides and a concave base. The fill was mid-brownish grey sandy clay 47. No finds were recovered from the feature.
To the west of ditch 46 was a rounded feature 44 which appeared to terminate to the north in the vicinity of ditch 48. As feature 44 was only partially revealed, its function has only been tentatively interpreted as a pit. This is mainly because of its visible shape and form, although the possibility of a wide ditch terminus cannot be ruled out. A section placed to intersect ditch cut 48 and feature 44 revealed that feature 44 truncated ditch 48 (Fig. 4, section 7). The excavated segment of feature 44 and ditch 48 measured 0.90m north–south x 0.75m wide east–west. The excavations demonstrated that 44 was 0.46m deep, with a gradually sloping east edge and contained a single mid-grey sandy silt fill 45. A small abraded sherd of 11th–12th-century pottery and three fragments of animal bone were recovered from fill 45. Cattle remains consisted of the articular
SUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL
nps archaeology St George’s Court, Globe Street, Methwold, Norfolk Archaeological Trial Trench Evaluation
Page 13
Trench 1
end of a scapula and a large fragment of pelvis including a small talus which had been chopped, with cut marks on the talus suggesting that the cow had been skinned. A single fragment of bird bone was also recovered, but could not be positively identified as no diagnostic zones were present.
SUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL
30
28
36
32
34
38
40
42
46
44
S. 1
S. 9
S. 2
S. 3
S. 4
S. 5
S. 6
S. 8
S. 7
44
48
Figure 3. Trench 1 plan. Scale 1:75
N
0 5m
SUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL
28
29
30
31
Ditches 28 and 30.
36
37
Post-hole 36.
WestEast
North
South-facing section 7
West East
44
45
48
49
West-facing section 4
38
39
2
1
40
41
42
43
North South
West-facing section 5
North South
45
46
47
South North
44
East-facing section 8
South-facing section 3
West East
32
33
South North
East-facing section 6
West-facing section 2
34
32
33 35
South
5.76m OD 5.96m OD
5.96m OD
5.88m OD
5.89m OD
5.87m OD
5.79m OD
5.79m OD
5.79m OD
Southwest-facing section 1
Ditches 32 and 34.
Ditch 32
Ditch 32
Ditch 40 and post-hole 42
Ditch 46
Ditch 46 and pit 44
Pit 44
South
West-facing section 9
North
Figure 4. Trench 1. Sections 1-9. Scale 1:20
02mSUBJE
CT TO APPROVAL
nps archaeology St George’s Court, Globe Street, Methwold, Norfolk Archaeological Trial Trench Evaluation
Page 16
Trench 2
Figures 2 and 5
Location
Orientation East–west
East end 573046, 295026
West end 573027, 295030
Dimensions
Length 7.00m
Width 1.60m
Depth 1.20m
Levels
East top 6.23m OD
West top 5.80m OD
Context Type Description and Interpretation Thickness
01 Deposit Topsoil 0.80m
02 Deposit Subsoil 0.40m
66 Cut East-west aligned ditch 0.10m
67 Deposit Fill of 66 0.10m
68 Cut East-west aligned ditch 0.25m
69 Deposit Fill of 68 0.25m
75 U/S Unstratified finds
79 Deposit Coarse sand overlaying chalk geology 0.05m
Discussion
Trench 2 was located in the east of the site. The trench was excavated to natural deposits at 1.20m below the ground surface i.e. between 6.23m OD (east) and 5.80m OD (west). The overburden above the geological mid-greyish white chalk consisted of homogeneous mid-brown silty sand topsoil 01, mid-grey chalky clayey sand subsoil 02, and coarse mid-brown silty sand 79.
The trench contained a single ditch which ran along the entire length of the trench. No dating evidence was recovered from two excavated sections. However, a copper-alloy button and a copper-alloy fork, both of which are dated to the post-medieval period, were recovered from an unstratified context 75.
One east-west aligned ditch 66=68 was recorded in Trench 2. The width of the ditch was not fully revealed as it was partially obscured along the north side of the trench. The visible part of the ditch measured 7.00m long. The excavated segments were 0.50m wide x 0.20m deep and 0.60m wide x 0.12m deep. The ditch contained a single fill 67=69 consisting of mid-grey clay with frequent chalk lumps (Fig. 5, sections 1 and 2). It was noted that the ditch cut through coarse silty sand deposit 79 and the underlying chalk geology. Deposit 79 was observed throughout the trench with the excavated edge demonstrating that it was 50mm deep. A similar deposit to 79 may have been present in Trench 3.
SUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL
66
68
S. 1
S. 2
North South
Trench 2 Ditch 66
West-facing section 1
66
67
68
69
South North
4.73m OD 4.63m OD
Trench 2 Ditch 68
East-facing section 2
N
Figure 5. Trench 2. Plan scale 1:50. Sections 1 and 2 scale 1:20
5m0
0 1m
SUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL
nps archaeology St George’s Court, Globe Street, Methwold, Norfolk Archaeological Trial Trench Evaluation
Page 18
Trench 3
Figures 2, 6 and 7; Plates 3 and 4
Location
Orientation North–south
North end 573018, 295013
South end 573015, 294994
Dimensions
Length 20.00m
Width 1.60m
Depth 0.90m
Levels
North top 5.60m OD
South top 5.91m OD
Context Type Description and Interpretation Thickness
01 Deposit Topsoil 0.80m
02 Deposit Subsoil 0.10m
50 Cut East–west aligned ditch 0.30m
51 Deposit Fill of 50 0.30m
52 Cut Post-hole 0.15m
53 Deposit Fill of 52 0.15m
54 Cut Post-hole 0.10m
55 Deposit Fill of 54 0.10m
56 Cut Post-hole 0.15m
57 Deposit Fill of 56 0.15m
58 Cut Shallow ditch/undulation 0.15m
59 Deposit Fill of 58 0.15m
60 Cut East–west aligned curvilinear ditch 0.25m
61 Deposit Fill of 60 0.25m
62 Cut Pit 0.15m
63 Deposit Fill of 62 0.15m
64 Cut East-west aligned linear chalk deposit NA
65 Deposit Fill of 64 NA
76 U/S Unstratified finds
Discussion
SUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL
nps archaeology St George’s Court, Globe Street, Methwold, Norfolk Archaeological Trial Trench Evaluation
Page 19
Trench 3
Trench 3 was located in the centre of the site. The trench was excavated to natural deposits at 0.90m below the ground surface i.e. between 5.60m OD (north) and 5.91m OD (south). The overburden above the mixed geology of mid-greyish white chalk and pure orange sand consisted of homogeneous mid-greyish brown silty sand topsoil 01 and mid-grey chalky clayey sand subsoil 02.
The trench contained two ditches 50 and 60, one probable ditch 58, three post-holes 52, 54 and 56, a pit 62, and a linear chalk deposit 64 (Plate 3). Dating evidence from the excavated sections was limited to a single sherd of 11th–12th-century pottery from ditch 50. Finds recovered from an unstratified context 76 included a medieval copper-alloy buckle (SF7), a medieval/post-medieval copper-alloy vessel foot or leg (SF5), and a copper-alloy jetton dated to the post-medieval period (SF6).
Trench 3. Post-hole 52 and ditches 50, 58 and 60, looking southeast
The geology in the north end of the trench consisted of orange sand, which extended south of pit 62; thereafter it consisted of chalk. It was noted that the archaeological features in this trench were confined to the area of sand, and in retrospect chalk deposit 64 appears to be incongruous with the surrounding sand (Plate 4).
Plate 4. Trench 3. Showing chalk deposit 64, looking south
SUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL
nps archaeology St George’s Court, Globe Street, Methwold, Norfolk Archaeological Trial Trench Evaluation
Page 20
Trench 3
To the south of 64 two post-holes 52 and 54 were recorded.
Post-hole 52 measured 0.30m east–west x 0.50m north–south x 0.14m deep, with a gradual slope and concave base (Fig. 7, section 1). Although no datable finds were recovered from the mid-brown clayey sand fill 53, a single piece of cattle bone was found.
Post-hole 54 was 0.20m in diameter x 0.10m deep, with a gradual slope and a concave base. No finds were recovered from the mid-brown clayey sand fill 55 (Fig. 7, section 2).
South of the post-holes 52 and 54 there was an east-west aligned feature and a partially exposed sub-circular pit-like feature. A 1.10m-wide section was excavated across the features and post-hole 52 (Fig. 7, sections 1 and 3).
The excavations carried out in the east-west feature revealed two ditches 50 and 60, a shallow linear cut 58 and a probable post-hole 56.
The north-most ditch 50 was 0.68m wide x 0.16m deep (east) and 0.30m deep (west). The east part of the ditch had a gradual slope and a concave base (Fig. 7, section 1). The base of the ditch sloped east–west with an oblique slope to the west and a tapered base (Fig. 7, section 3). A single sherd of early medieval ware pottery dated to the 11th–12th-century was recovered from dark brown clayey sand fill 51.
To the south of 50 was a shallow ditch 58. The west-facing section demonstrated that it was c. 0.60m wide x 0.14m deep, with a gradual sloping side to the southeast whilst the northeast side merged imperceptibly into the southeast side of ditch 50 (Fig. 7, section 1).
As with 50, the base of feature 58 sloped east–west with a probable post-hole 56 recorded in the east-facing section. The excavated portion of post-hole 56 demonstrated that it was at least 0.16m long (east–west) x 0.30m wide x 0.16m deep, with a gradual slope and a concave base (Fig. 7, section 3). No finds were recovered from the dark brown clayey sand fill 57.
South of 58, ditch 60 measured between 1.40m (east) and 1.15m (west) wide x 0.40m deep. The west-facing section demonstrated that it had a stepped south side and a long gradual sloping side to the north and a concave base (Fig. 7, section 1). The east-facing section had a gradual slope and a concave base (Fig. 7, section 3). No finds were recovered from the mid-orange silty sand fill 61.
The south-most feature was pit 62. Its west edge was outside the limit of excavation. The excavated section demonstrated that it was at least 0.70m long (east–west) x 1.60m wide x 0.14m deep, with a long gradual sloping side to the south and a flat base. No finds were recovered from dark brown silty sand fill 63.
SUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL
64
54
52
50
56
58
60
62
S. 3
S. 1
S. 2
Figure 6. Trench 3 plan. Scale 1:75
N
0 5m
SUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL
52
53
South North
62
60
61
56
57
50
51
54
55
West East
North
50
51 59
58 60
61
4.84m OD
4.84m OD
South
Ditches 50 and 60, pit 62 and post-hole 56
East-facing section 3
Ditches 50, 58 and 60 and post-hole 52 West-facing section 1
Post-hole 54
North-facing section 2
4.72m OD
Figure 7. Trench 3. Sections 1, 2 and 3. Scale 1:20
02m
SUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL
nps archaeology St George’s Court, Globe Street, Methwold, Norfolk Archaeological Trial Trench Evaluation
Page 23
Trench 4
Figures 2, 8; Plates 5 and 6
Location
Orientation North–south
North end 573038, 295013
South end 573034, 294978
Dimensions
Length 10.00m
Width 1.60m
Depth 0.80m
Levels
North top 6.11m OD
South top 6.20m OD
Context Type Description and Interpretation Thickness
01 Deposit Topsoil 0.80m
71 Deposit Dark grey clay 0.62m
72 Deposit Light brown clayey sand 0.42m
73 Deposit Light grey clay and chalk lumps 0.30m
77 U/S Unstratified finds
Discussion
Trench 4 was located in the southeast of the site. The trench was excavated to 1.90m below the ground surface at 6.11m OD (north) and 1.20m below the ground surface at 6.20m OD (south). The overburden consisted of homogeneous mid-greyish brown silty sand topsoil 01. No subsoil was observed in the trench.
A post-medieval lamp fitting was recovered from unstratified context 77.
Trench 4 was machined from south–north. No geological deposits were exposed in the south 10.00m of the trench, as excavation would have exceeded a safe working depth of (generally a maximum of) 1.20m below ground surface. It was therefore decided to evaluate the depth of natural ground by machine. Under controlled conditions further machining was undertaken at the north end of the trench, revealing that geological clays were not reached until 1.90m below ground level at 6.11m OD (Plate 5).
A sondage measuring 1.50m north–south x 1.00m east–west x 0.95m deep was excavated in the south end of the trench (Plate 6). The excavated slot did not reach natural ground, although three deposits 71, 72 and 73 were present. The deposits are likely to represent deliberate in-filling of a possible pond-like feature, or perhaps a large extraction pit.
Below the topsoil 01 was a dark grey clay with frequent chalk lumps measuring 0.58m deep. Beneath 71 was a light brown clayey sand 72 with frequent chalk lumps measuring 0.38m deep. It is considered that the lighter sandy clay soil and the possibility of rooting or worm action in deposit 72 suggests that this deposit represents a former ground surface. Deposit 72 overlay a light grey clay with frequent chalk lumps 73. Limited excavation was undertaken of deposit 73, so it remains unclear whether this deposit forms a primary feature fill overlying natural ground (Fig. 8, section 1).
SUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL
nps archaeology St George’s Court, Globe Street, Methwold, Norfolk Archaeological Trial Trench Evaluation
Page 24
Trench 4
Plate 5. Trench 4. West-facing section north end
Plate 6. Trench 4. Sondage, looking west
A single fragment of sheep proximal phalange, which had been cut during the skinning process was recovered from deposit 72. The bone was heavily burnt, leaving it oxidised with a white appearance.
SUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL
71
73
73
72
71
S. 1
South
01
71
East-facing section 1
North
71
72
73
72
4.27m OD
N
Figure 8. Trench 4 plan scale 1:50 and Section 1 scale 1:20
5m0
0 1mSUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL
nps archaeology St George’s Court, Globe Street, Methwold, Norfolk Archaeological Trial Trench Evaluation
Page 26
Trench 5
Figures 2, 9 and 10; Plate 7
Location
Orientation East–west
East end 573007, 294981
West end 572987, 294985
Dimensions
Length 20.00m
Width 1.60m
Depth 0.70m
Levels
East top 5.91m OD
West top 5.35m OD
Context Type Description and Interpretation Thickness
01 Deposit Topsoil
02 Deposit Subsoil
03 Cut North–south aligned ditch 0.25m
04 Deposit Fill of 03 0.25m
05 Cut North–south aligned ditch 0.25m
06 Deposit Fill of 05 0.25m
07 Cut North–south aligned ditch 0.28m
08 Deposit Fill of 07 0.28m
09 Cut North–south aligned ditch 0.12m
10 Deposit Fill of 09 0.12m
11 Cut North–south aligned ditch 0.25m
12 Deposit Fill of 11 0.25m
13 Cut North–south aligned ditch 0.42m
14 Deposit Fill of 13 0.42m
15 Cut North–south aligned ditch 0.42m
16 Deposit Fill of 15 0.42m
17 Cut North–south aligned ditch 0.05m
18 Deposit Fill of 17 0.05m
19 Cut Pit 0.30m
20 Deposit Fill of 19 0.14m
SUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL
nps archaeology St George’s Court, Globe Street, Methwold, Norfolk Archaeological Trial Trench Evaluation
Page 27
Trench 5
21 Deposit Fill of 19 0.16m
22 Cut Post-hole 0.20m
23 Deposit Fill of 22 0.20m
24 Cut Post-hole 0.14m
25 Deposit Fill of 24 0.14m
26 Cut Small pit 0.22m
27 Deposit Fill of 26 0.22m
78 U/S Unstratified finds
Discussion
Trench 5 was located in the southwest of the site. The trench was excavated to 1.20m below the ground surface at 5.91m OD (east) and 5.35m OD (west). The overburden consisted of homogeneous mid-greyish brown silty sand topsoil 01 and subsoil 02.
A total of eight ditches 03, 05, 07, 09, 11, 13, 15, 17, a pit 19 and two possible post-holes or small pits 24 and 26 were recorded in the trench. The only datable find from the excavated sections was a sherd of 9th–10th-century pottery recovered from ditch 17. Unstratified finds 78 included a medieval copper-alloy buckle plate (SF10) and a post-medieval button (SF9).
An undated irregular feature 05 was recorded in the west of the trench. In plan, this feature had a curved appearance, was aligned broadly east–west and measured 2.00m x 0.70m x 0.24m deep. It contained a single fill consisting of pale brown silty sand 06. It appeared from the section that feature 05 truncated ditch 07 and was truncated by ditch 03 (Fig. 10, sections 1 and 2).
The west-most ditch 03 measured 1.60m wide x 0.25m deep, with a gradual slope and a concave base. No finds were recovered from its single fill of mid–dark brown sandy silt 04 (Fig. 10, section 1).
Irregular feature 05 was seen in section to truncate the west edge of ditch 07. Ditch 07 measured 0.40m wide x 0.26m deep, with a gradual eastern slope and a concave base. No finds were recovered from the pale brown sandy silt fill 08 (Fig. 10, section 2).
To the east of ditch 07 two parallel ditches 09 and 11 were recorded. Ditch 09 truncated the earlier ditch 11. Ditch 09 measured 0.40m wide x 0.12m deep, with a gradual slope and a concave base. It contained a single fill consisting of mid–dark brown sandy silt 10. Ditch 11 was the larger of the two ditches measuring 0.50m wide x 0.25m deep, with a gradual slope and a concave base. It contained a single fill of mid-brownish grey sandy silt 12 (Fig. 10, section 3). No finds were recovered from either of the two ditches.
In the central part of the trench, ditch 15 was recorded truncating ditch 13. Both were aligned north–south. The earlier of the two ditches 13 measured 0.80m wide x 0.40m deep, with an oblique east slope and slightly stepped west slope and a concave base. The later ditch 15 measured 1.17m wide x 0.42m deep, with a gradual slope and a flat base (Fig. 10, section 4, Plate 7).
A large irregular feature was observed east of ditches 13 and 15. A section was placed across the widest part of the feature revealing a linear feature 17, a pit 19 and a probable small pit or post-hole 22.
In section, ditch 17 truncated the west part of pit 19. Ditch 17 measured 0.65m wide x 0.10m deep, with a broad, shallow profile (Fig. 10, section 5). A single sherd of 9th–10th-century pottery was recovered from the mid-brown sandy fill 18.
Pit 19 lay partly outside the north limit of excavation. The excavated section measured 2.90m east–west x 1.05m north–south x 0.60m deep, with a gradual east slope and a flattish base. It contained two deposits consisting of an upper fill of mid-greyish brown sandy silt 21
SUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL
nps archaeology St George’s Court, Globe Street, Methwold, Norfolk Archaeological Trial Trench Evaluation
Page 28
Trench 5
and a lower fill of mid-greyish brown sandy silt 20 (Fig. 10, section 5). No finds were recovered from the pit.
Plate 7. Trench 5. Ditches 13 and 15, looking south
It was uncertain whether a small pit or post-hole 22 recorded in the north-facing section was a variation in the south side of pit 19, or whether it was a genuinely unique feature cut into the south edge of pit 19. Small pit or post-hole 22 measured 0.40m wide x 0.20m deep, with a gradual east slope and a concave base. No finds were recovered from its mid-brown sandy silt fill 23 (Fig. 10, section 6).
A small pit and a post-hole were recorded in the east of the trench. Post-hole 24 measured 0.30m in diameter x 0.14m deep, with a gradual slope and a flat base. No finds were recovered from its mid-brown sandy silt fill 25 (Fig. 10, section 7).
Small pit 26 measured 0.75m east–west x 0.40m north–south x 0.22m deep, with a gradual slope and a flat base. No finds were recovered from the mid-brown sandy silt fill 27 (Fig. 10, section 8).
SUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL
03
05
07
09
11
13
15
17
19
24
26
S. 1
S. 2
S. 4
S. 5
S. 7
S. 8
S. 3
22
S. 6
05
Figure 9. Trench 5 plan. Scale 1:75
N
0 5m
SUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL
05
06
East West
04
03
Ditche 03 and feature 05.
North-facing section 1
05
06
07
08
West East
Ditches 05 and 07.
South-facing section 2
09
10
11
12
Ditches 09 and 11.
South-facing section 3
West East East West
15
16
13
14
Ditches 13 and 15.
North-facing section 4
North South
24
25
Pit 24.
North-facing section 7
26
27
East
West
Pit 26.
South-facing section 8
4.84m OD
17
20
West
Post-hole 17 and pit 19.
South-facing section 5
4.87m OD
East
19
2221
18
23
Post-hole 22.
North-facing section 6
4.87m OD
East West
4.78m OD
4.84m OD
4.91m OD
4.94m OD
4.96m OD
Figure 10. Trench 5. Sections 1 to 8. Scale 1:20.
02m
SUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL
nps archaeology St George’s Court, Globe Street, Methwold, Norfolk Archaeological Trial Trench Evaluation
Page 31
ARCHAEOLOGICAL FINDS
56 The archaeological finds were washed, dried, marked and bagged and were recorded by count and weight. Data was entered onto a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet, which forms part of the project archive.
57 A discussion of each material type is given below. Appendix 2a comprises a list of all archaeological materials found by the evaluation in context number order.
Pottery
Introduction
58 Seven sherds (636g) of post-Roman pottery were recovered from five contexts. Table 2 shows the quantification by fabric; a summary catalogue by context is included as Appendix 3.
Description Fabric Date range No Wt/g Eve MNV
Thetford-type ware THET L.9th–11th c. 1 2 1
Stamford Ware Fabric A STAM L.9th–10th c. 1 7 1
Early medieval ware EMW 11th–12th c. 2 42 0.16 2
Yarmouth-type ware YAR 11th–12th c. 1 3 1
Grimston-type ware GRIM L.12th–14th c. 2 9 2
Table 2 Pottery quantification by fabric
59 The assemblage ranges from Late Saxon to high medieval in date.
Methodology
60 Quantification was carried out using sherd count, weight and estimated vessel equivalent (eve). The minimum number of vessels (MNV) within each context was also recorded, but cross-fitting was not attempted unless particularly distinctive vessels were observed in more than one context. A full quantification by fabric, context and feature is available in archive. All fabric codes were assigned from the author’s post-Roman fabric series, which includes East Anglian and Midlands fabrics, as well as imported wares. Form terminology for medieval pottery is based on MPRG (1998), and identification of wares is based on Jennings (1981). Recording uses a system of letters for fabric codes together with number codes for ease of sorting in database format. The results were input directly onto an Access database.
The assemblage
61 One body sherd of Thetford-type ware was found in ditch fill 33, in association with medieval pottery. A body sherd of pale green/yellow glazed Stamford Ware (Fabric A) was found in ditch fill 18. These sherds indicate activity of the Late Saxon period on the site.
62 The early medieval period was represented by a small, abraded fragment of Yarmouth-type ware in ditch fill 45, an abraded body sherd of early medieval ware in ditch fill 51, and a large fragment of an early medieval ware jar rim of simple everted form with thumbed decoration on the outer edge, unstratified in Trench 1.
SUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL
nps archaeology St George’s Court, Globe Street, Methwold, Norfolk Archaeological Trial Trench Evaluation
Page 32
63 Two sherds of Grimston-type green glazed pottery were recovered from ditch fills 33 and 45. The latter was possibly decorated with applied decoration and an incised line.
Pottery by context
64 A brief catalogue of the pottery by context is provided in Appendix 3. Table 3 provides a summary spot dating list.
Trench Context Feature Fabrics Spot date
1 33 Ditch 32 THET GRIM L.12th-14th c.
1 45 Ditch 44 YAR GRIM L.12th-14th c.
1 74 U/S EMW 11th–12th c.
3 51 Ditch 50 EMW 11th–12th c.
5 18 Ditch 17 STAMA L.9th–10th c.
Table 3. Pottery distribution by context
65 The distribution of pottery across the site suggests potential for activity of later 9th–14th century across at least three trenches. None of the pottery is heavily abraded, suggesting that it had not moved far from the original point of deposition.
Discussion
66 Although this is a small assemblage, it is the first to include Late Saxon pottery from the centre of Methwold village. Both Thetford and Stamford wares are present, and whilst Thetford ware is not surprising in this location, Stamford ware is a less common find in rural East Anglia, perhaps attesting to the importance of this fen-edge settlement at the time.
67 The medieval wares include handmade early medieval types, which may have been made and used well into the 13th century in west Norfolk, and Grimston-type ware from northwest Norfolk. Both types are common in this area.
Metal Finds
68 Ten copper-alloy and one possible pewter find were recovered by the evaluation. All metalwork was unstratified, and came from Trenches 1–5. A full catalogue is available in the Appendix.
69 The earliest pieces recovered were a buckle (SF7) and two buckle plates (SF2 and SF10). The buckle is an asymmetrical double-loop example and came from Trench 3. This is likely to be dated to between c. 1350 and 1450 (Whitehead, 1996, 87, no. 540). Both of the plates are rectangular sheet examples, plain and simple, and cannot be more closely dated than medieval. These pieces were found in Trenches 1 and 5 respectively.
70 A late medieval–early post-medieval solid bronze vessel leg (SF5) was recovered from Trench 3. The leg is triangular in plan and tapers down to a sub-rounded ‘foot’. The upper part of the leg is sooted and blackened with use.
71 A jetton (SF6) was recovered, and although slightly misstruck, it appears to be complete, and is legible. This was recovered from Trench 3 and can be identified as a jetton of Hans Schultes III, dating to between 1608 and 1612, and minted in Nuremberg.
SUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL
nps archaeology St George’s Court, Globe Street, Methwold, Norfolk Archaeological Trial Trench Evaluation
Page 33
72 The remaining metal finds include a fork (SF4), two buttons (SFs 3 and 9) and an oil lamp fitting (SF8). The possible pewter buckle (SF1) is oval, but has no apparent drilling for a separate pin, and so the identification of this piece remains uncertain.
Faunal Remains
Animal Bone
Introduction and Methodology
73 The bone in the assemblage consists of hand-collected remains. This is a small assemblage and in relatively poor condition, and an initial rapid scan showed little potential for further work. A summary assessment has therefore been produced. All of the bone was identified to species wherever possible using a variety of comparative reference material. Where a complete identification to species was not possible, bone was assigned to a group, such as ‘sheep/goat’ or ‘mammal’ whenever possible. The bones were recorded using a modified version of guidelines described in Davis (1992).
74 Any butchering was recorded, noting the type, such as cut, chopped or sawn and location. Bones were examined for any burning, gnawing or pathologies. Other modifications were recorded, such as any possible industrial or craft working waste.
75 Weights and total number of pieces counts were also taken for each context, along with the number of pieces for each individual species present (NISP), and these are given in Appendix 4. As this is a small assemblage, all of the information was input directly into a catalogue in the appendix for this report.
The faunal assemblage
Quantification, provenance and preservation
76 The bone is in reasonable condition, but with much of the remains showing a little wear and erosion, probably due to some acidity in the soil and perhaps some exposure to weathering prior to burial.
Context Spot date Weight (g) Count
16 Undated 14 1
33 Late Saxon/medieval 60 1
45 Medieval 216 4
53 Undated 183 1
72 Undated 1 1
Totals 474 8
Table 4. Quantification of the faunal assemblage by context number, spot date, weight in grams and fragment count
77 The single sheep phalange from deposit 72 had been heavily burnt, leaving it fully oxidised and white in appearance. This level of burning might suggest the inclusion of some sheep remains in a cremation, but the bone may have been left in a domestic fire for a time and left heavily burnt.
78 No canid gnawing was seen in the assemblage, which may suggest a lack of dogs or scavengers.
SUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL
nps archaeology St George’s Court, Globe Street, Methwold, Norfolk Archaeological Trial Trench Evaluation
Page 34
Species and modifications
79 At least four species are present in the assemblage. Table 5 shows the quantification of species by context.
Context Species NISP
16 Sheep/goat 1
33 Equid 1
45 Cattle 3
Bird 1
53 Cattle 1
72 Sheep 1
Total 8
Table 5. Quantification of the faunal assemblage by context, species and NISP
80 Cattle were recorded from ditch fill 45 and post-hole fill 53. The remains in 45 consist of the articular end of a scapula, a large fragment of pelvis and a relatively small talus. The scapula and pelvis had been chopped and cut marks were noted on the talus, which suggested this cow had been skinned. The cattle metatarsal from 53 had been chopped; the metapodial is very robust and probably from a mature bull.
81 Sheep/goat were seen in two contexts. A sheep/goat radius, which had been chopped, was produced from ditch fill 16. A sheep proximal phalange was recovered from deposit 72, which had been cut during the skinning process and the bone was heavily burnt leaving it with a white appearance.
82 A single metatarsal from a very young (neonatal) equid was found in ditch fill 33. No butchering was seen on the bone. It may be possible that this young foal was from a natural still birth.
83 There was a single fragment of bird bone from ditch fill 45, which could not be identified to species as no diagnostic zones were present.
84 There were no bones present that showed any pathological conditions that may indicate the health of the stock or uses of the animals. None of the bone in this assemblage was sufficiently complete for any measurements to be taken which might allow estimation of stature, breed or species.
Discussion and conclusions
85 This is a small assemblage that is mostly derived from the butchering and food waste. The range of bone and elements show good preservation at this site.
86 The cattle and sheep/goat remains at the site clearly suggest the provision of skins and meat. The neonatal equid bone was found in association with Late Saxon and medieval ceramics, which might suggest equid breeding during this time at Methwold. It was not possible to determine if the bird in this assemblage was of wild or domestic origin.
Shell
87 Two species of shell were identified, both from pit fill 20, which are quantified by context in Table 6.
SUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL
nps archaeology St George’s Court, Globe Street, Methwold, Norfolk Archaeological Trial Trench Evaluation
Page 35
Context Feature Species Species Count
Context Count
Context Weight
20 Pit Mussel 2 3 5
Ramshorn snail 1
Totals 3 3 5
Table 6. Quantification of the shell assemblage by context and species
88 The two mussels are of marine origin and are likely to have been collected for food.
89 The species of snail found is the Great Ramshorn or Trumpet snail (Planorbuarius corneus), the larger and most common of the four species of Ramshorn snails in Britain. The Ramshorn snail is a freshwater aquatic species of snail, commonly found in ponds, lakes and slow-moving water. These species are not known to have been used for human consumption.
SUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL
nps archaeology St George’s Court, Globe Street, Methwold, Norfolk Archaeological Trial Trench Evaluation
Page 36
ENVIRONMENTAL REMAINS
90 Soil samples taken from archaeological features for palaeoenvironmental analysis have not been processed at time of writing. The unavoidable omission of the environmental report has been accepted by NHES, and a report on the environmental remains will form part of the final issue of this report.
SUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL
nps archaeology St George’s Court, Globe Street, Methwold, Norfolk Archaeological Trial Trench Evaluation
Page 37
DISCUSSION
91 The evaluation undertaken by NPS Archaeology at St George’s Court, Globe Street, Methwold, has demonstrated good survival of archaeological features and deposits beneath a substantial overburden. The presence of low densities of artefacts in Trenches 1, 3 and 5 suggests historical occupation in this area is likely to date between the 9th–14th-centuries. Occasional finds of post-medieval material suggest that the site has not been unduly disturbed in the recent past.
92 The evaluation recorded a remarkable number of perpendicular ditches on north–south and east–west alignments. This arrangement of ditches can be seen to broadly follow that of the moated site or fishpond adjacent to the west side of the site, and perhaps also that of the medieval tofts and fishponds known to the southwest. Apparent re-cutting of the ditches to maintain divisions and drainage indicates lengthy use of the site. The ditches may relate to the demarcation of small properties, but other functions are not discounted.
93 Small numbers of post-holes in Trenches 3 and 5 may indicate the presence of post-built structures, and hence may constitute evidence of settlement alongside the occupational activities represented by the ditch features, and by pits.
94 Finds from the excavated features were few, but perhaps can be taken to characterise them as being of medieval origin. The presence of small numbers of medieval pottery sherds supports a view of low density occupational activity on the edges of the known medieval settlement areas to the south.
95 Although the pottery assemblage was small in number and weight it is the first site from Methwold village to include Late Saxon material. The evidence that the sherds of pottery were not heavily abraded suggests that they had not moved far from their original place of deposition and may therefore indicate activity or occupation at the site prior to the medieval period, which would be a significant discovery for the developmental history of settlement here.
96 In conclusion, it seems reasonable to assume that the archaeological features and finds recorded by the evaluation constitute an element of the well-documented earthworks and ditched features related to the shrunken medieval village of Methwold. Without further archaeological work at the site it is not possible to expound further on the function and arrangement of the buried features, but it is plain that they can be viewed within a context of small-scale medieval settlement and farming. It is considered likely that the range, date and character of the archaeology recorded by the evaluation is representative of the site as a whole.
97 Recommendations for further archaeological mitigation work (if required, based on the evidence presented in this report) will be made by NHES.
SUBJE
CT TO APPROVAL
nps archaeology St George’s Court, Globe Street, Methwold, Norfolk Archaeological Trial Trench Evaluation
Page 38
Acknowledgements
NPS Archaeology would like to thank Mr David Waters for support and consideration during the archaeological works.
The project was commissioned by Windsor Architectural and funded by Mulberry Tree Homes Ltd.
The fieldwork was undertaken by the author, Tom Baxter-Campbell, Gary Collyer and Robby Copsey.
The finds were processed by Louise Weetman. Metal finds were reported on by Rebecca Sillwood, pottery was identified by Sue Anderson and the faunal remains were reported on by Julie Curl. Rebecca Sillwood prepared the finds report.
Special thanks are given to Ken Hamilton of NHES for his help and understanding, especially in regards to the depths of machining in Trenches 2 and 4.
The work was overseen for NPS by Andrew Crowson who also edited the draft text. Figures for this report were prepared by the author and finalised by David Dobson.
SUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL
nps archaeology St George’s Court, Globe Street, Methwold, Norfolk Archaeological Trial Trench Evaluation
Page 39
Bibliography and Sources
British Geological Survey 2015. Geology of Britain viewer. [online] Available at: http://mapapps.bgs.ac.uk/geologyofbritain/home.html. [Accessed 8 January 2016]
Chartered Institute for Archaeologists (CIfA) 2014a. Standard and guidance for archaeological field evaluation/an archaeological watching brief/archaeological excavation
Chartered Institute for Archaeologists (CIfA) 2014b. Standard and guidance for the collection, documentation, conservation and research of archaeological materials
Chartered Institute for Archaeologists (CIfA) 2014c. Standard and Guidance for the creation, compilation, transfer and deposition of archaeological archives
Cushion, B. and Davison, A. 2003. Earthworks of Norfolk. East Anglian Archaeology 104
Department for Communities and Local Government 2012. National Planning Policy Framework
Medlycott, M. (ed.) 2011. Research and Archaeology Revisited: a Revised Framework for the East of England. East Anglian Archaeology Occasional Paper 24
Davis, S. 1992. A Rapid Method For Recording Information About Mammal Bones From Archaeological Sites. English Heritage AML Report 71/92
Hillson, S.1992. Mammal bones and teeth. The Institute of Archaeology, University College, London
Jennings, S. 1981. Eighteen Centuries of Pottery from Norwich. East Anglian Archaeology 13
Macnair, A. 2016. Faden’s Map of Norfolk. [online] Available at: http://www.fadensmapofnorfolk.co.uk/mapBrowserNew.asp. [Accessed 11 March 2016]
MPRG. 1998. A Guide to the Classification of Medieval Ceramic Forms. Medieval Pottery Research Group Occasional Paper 1
Norfolk County Council 2016. Map Explorer. [online] Available at: http://historic-maps.norfolk.gov.uk/. [Accessed 11 March 2016]
Pfleger, V. 1990. A Field Guide in colour to Molluscs. Blitz
Whitehead, R. Buckles 1250-1800. Greenlight Publishing
SUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL
nps archaeology St George’s Court, Globe Street, Methwold, Norfolk Archaeological Trial Trench Evaluation
Page 40
Appendix 1a: Context Summary
Context Category Cut Type Fill Of
Description Period Trench
1 Deposit Subsoil 1 to 5
2 Deposit Subsoil 1 to 5
3 Cut Ditch 5
4 Deposit 3 Ditch fill 5
5 Cut Ditch 5
6 Deposit 5 Ditch fill 5
7 Cut Ditch 5
8 Deposit 7 Ditch fill 5
9 Cut Ditch 5
10 Deposit 9 Ditch fill 5
11 Cut Ditch 5
12 Deposit 11 Ditch fill 5
13 Cut Ditch 5
14 Deposit 13 Ditch fill 5
15 Cut Ditch 5
16 Deposit 15 Ditch fill 5
17 Cut Ditch 5
18 Deposit 17 Ditch fill 5
19 Cut Pit/natural feature
5
20 Deposit 19 Pit/natural feature fill 5
21 Deposit 19 Pit/natural feature fill 5
22 Cut Post-hole 5
23 Deposit 22 Post-hole fill 5
24 Cut Post-hole 5
25 Deposit 24 Post-hole fill 5
26 Cut Post-hole/small pit
5
27 Deposit 26 Post-hole/small pit fill 5
28 Cut Ditch 1
29 Deposit 28 Ditch fill 1
30 Cut Ditch 1
31 Deposit 30 Ditch fill 1
32 Cut Ditch 1
33 Deposit 32 Ditch fill 1
34 Cut Ditch 1
35 Deposit 34 Ditch fill 1
36 Cut Post-hole 1
37 Deposit 36 Post-hole fill 1
38 Cut Ditch 1
SUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL
nps archaeology St George’s Court, Globe Street, Methwold, Norfolk Archaeological Trial Trench Evaluation
Page 41
Context Category Cut Type Fill Of
Description Period Trench
39 Deposit 38 Ditch fill 1
40 Cut Ditch 1
41 Deposit 40 Ditch fill 1
42 Cut Post-hole 1
43 Deposit 42 Post-hole fill 1
44 Cut Pit 1
45 Deposit 44 Pit fill 1
46 Cut Ditch 1
47 Deposit 46 Ditch fill 1
48 Cut Ditch 1
49 Deposit 48 Ditch fill 1
50 Cut Ditch 3
51 Deposit 50 Ditch fill 3
52 Cut Post-hole 3
53 Deposit 52 Post-hole fill 3
54 Cut Post-hole 3
55 Deposit 54 Post-hole fill 3
56 Cut Post-hole 3
57 Deposit 56 Post-hole fill 3
58 Cut Shallow ditch/undulation
3
59 Deposit 58 Post-hole fill 3
60 Cut Ditch 3
61 Deposit 60 Ditch fill 3
62 Cut Ditch 3
63 Deposit 62 Ditch fill 3
64 Cut Linear chalk deposit
3
65 Deposit 64 Chalk deposit 3
66 Cut Ditch 2
67 Deposit 66 Ditch fill 2
68 Cut Ditch 2
69 Deposit 68 Ditch fill 2
70 VOID 4
71 Deposit Deposit in sondage 4
72 Deposit Deposit in sondage 4
73 Deposit Deposit in sondage 4
74 U/S Finds
Unstratified finds 1
75 U/S Finds
Unstratified finds 2
76 U/S Finds
Unstratified finds 3
SUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL
nps archaeology St George’s Court, Globe Street, Methwold, Norfolk Archaeological Trial Trench Evaluation
Page 42
Context Category Cut Type Fill Of
Description Period Trench
77 U/S Finds
Unstratified finds 4
78 U/S Finds
Unstratified finds 5
79 Deposit Coarse sand deposit 2
SUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL
nps archaeology St George’s Court, Globe Street, Methwold, Norfolk Archaeological Trial Trench Evaluation
Page 43
Appendix 2a: Finds by Context
Context Material Qty Wt Period
06 Animal bone 1 9g Unknown
06 Brick/tile 2 2g Post-medieval
06 Pottery 1 19g Post-medieval
06 Stone 1 14g Unknown
22 Pottery 4 617g Post-medieval
26 Pottery 2 1,305g Post-medieval
Appendix 2b: Finds Summary
Period Material Total
Post-medieval Brick/tile 2
Pottery 7
Unknown Animal bone 1
Stone 1
Appendix 3: Pottery Catalogue
Context Fabric No Wt/g MNV Form Rim Date
18 STAMA 1 7 1 Late 9th–10th century
33 THET 1 2 1 Late 9th-11th century
33 GRIM 1 6 1 Late 12th-14th century
45 YAR 1 3 1 11th-12th century
45 GRIM 1 3 1 Late 12th-14th century
51 EMW 1 8 1 11th-12th century
74 EMW 1 34 1 JR SEV 11th-12th century
SUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL
nps archaeology St George’s Court, Globe Street, Methwold, Norfolk Archaeological Trial Trench Evaluation
Page 44
Appendix 4: Animal Bone Catalogue
Key: NISP = Number of Individual Species elements Present Age j = juvenile (older than 1 month), neo = less than one moth from birth Butchering = c = cut, ch = chopped Elements: L = limb, MP = metapodial, sk = skull, man = mandible, t = tooth, f = foot bone, s/p = scapula/pelvis, v/r = vertebrae/ribs, hc = horncore. Count = Countable following Davis, 1992.
Conte
xt
Ctx
t Q
ty
Wt (g
)
Specie
s
NIS
P
Sp W
t (g
)
Adu
lt
Juv
Neo
L
MP
Sk
Man
T
F
S/P
V/R
HC
Count
Butc
heri
ng
Comments
16
1 14 Sheep/
goat 1 14 1 1
Chopped
Radius
33
1 60 Equid 1 60 1 1 1 Metatarsal
(3rd)
45
4 216
Cattle 3 215 3 1 2 3
Cut and chopped
Scapula (articular end), pelvic fragment, talus with cuts
45
Bird 1 1 1 1 Shaft
fragment
53
1 183
Cattle 1 183 1 1 1 Chopped
Very robust metatarsal – mature bull
72
1 1 Sheep 1 1 1 1 .5
Cut
Proximal phalange with fine cuts from
skinning. Bone has
been heavily burnt/cremated, resulting in
a fully oxidised
white element.
SUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL
nps archaeology St George’s Court, Globe Street, Methwold, Norfolk Archaeological Trial Trench Evaluation
Page 45
Appendix 5: Historical and Archaeological Periods
Period Date From Date To
Prehistoric -500,000 42
Early Prehistoric -500,000 -4,001
Palaeolithic -500,000 -10,001
Lower Palaeolithic -500,000 -150,001
Middle Palaeolithic -150,001 -40,001
Upper Palaeolithic -40,000 -10,001
Mesolithic -10,000 -4,001
Early Mesolithic -10,000 -7,001
Late Mesolithic -7,000 -4,001
Late Prehistoric -4,000 42
Neolithic -4,000 -2,351
Early Neolithic -4,000 -3,001
Middle Neolithic -3,500 -2,701
Late Neolithic -3,000 -2,351
Bronze Age -2,350 -701
Early Bronze Age -2,350 -1,501
Beaker -2,300 -1,700
Middle Bronze Age -1,600 -1,001
Late Bronze Age -1,000 -701
Iron Age -800 42
Early Iron Age -800 -401
Middle Iron Age -400 -101
Late Iron Age -100 42
Roman 42 409
Post Roman 410 1900
Saxon 410 1065
Early Saxon 410 650
Middle Saxon 651 850
Late Saxon 851 1065
Medieval 1066 1539
Post-medieval 1540 1900
Modern 1900 2050
World War One 1914 1918
World War Two 1939 1945
Cold War 1945 1992
Unknown -- --
after English Heritage Periods List, recommended by Forum on Information Standards in Heritage
available at: http://www.fish-forum.info/inscript.htm
SUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL
nps archaeology St George’s Court, Globe Street, Methwold, Norfolk Archaeological Trial Trench Evaluation
Page 46
Appendix 6: OASIS Report Summary
SUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL
OASIS DATA COLLECTION FORM:England
List of Projects | Manage Projects | Search Projects | New project | Change your details | HERcoverage | Change country | Log out
Printable version
OASIS ID: norfolka1-242138
Project details
Project name St Georges Court, Globe Street, Methwold, Norfolk
Short descriptionof the project
NPS Archaeology was commissioned by MCP Law on behalf of WindsorArchitectural to carry out an archaeological trial trench evaluation ahead ofplanned construction of residential housing at St George's Court, off GlobeStreet, Methwold, Norfolk (TL 73015, 95006). The proposed development siteencompasses an area of 0.42ha. Five trial trenches were situated to provide asample of c. 5% of the site. The archaeological works took place on 17-19January 2016. The trenches revealed an arrangement of inter-cut ditches, pitsand post-holes, some of which were of 9th-11th-century date and others of11th-14th-century date. Although there was limited evidence for settlementoccupation at the site, Late Saxon pottery and artefacts of medieval and post-medieval date suggest that activity had occurred within the vicinity of the siteintermittently across several centuries. It is considered likely that the evidencerecovered situates the evaluation site on the north edge of a shrunken medievalvillage, known from surrounding fields by earthworks of tofts, enclosures andfish ponds.
Project dates Start: 17-02-2016 End: 19-02-2016
Previous/futurework
Not known / Not known
Any associatedproject referencecodes
139988 - HER event no.
Type of project Field evaluation
Site status None
Current Land use Grassland Heathland 5 - Character undetermined
Monument type PIT Uncertain
Monument type DITCH Medieval
Monument type POST-HOLE Uncertain
Significant Finds POTTERY Early Medieval
Significant Finds POTTERY Medieval
Methods &techniques
''Targeted Trenches''
Developmenttype
Rural residential
Prompt National Planning Policy Framework - NPPF
Page 1 of 3OASIS FORM - Print view
14/03/2016http://oasis.ac.uk/form/print.cfm
SUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL
Position in theplanning process
Pre-application
Project location
Country England
Site location NORFOLK KINGS LYNN AND WEST NORFOLK METHWOLD St GeorgesCourt, Globe Street, Methwold
Study area 0.42 Hectares
Site coordinates TL 73015 95006 52.5249988367 0.550635513791 52 31 30 N 000 33 02 EPoint
Project creators
Name ofOrganisation
NPS Archaeology
Project brieforiginator
Norfolk Historic Environment Service
Project designoriginator
NPS Archaeology
Projectdirector/manager
John Ames
Project supervisor NPS Archaeology
Project archives
Physical Archiverecipient
Norfolk Museums Service
Physical Contents ''Ceramics'',''Worked stone/lithics''
Digital Archiverecipient
NPS Archaeology
Digital Contents ''other''
Digital Mediaavailable
''Images raster / digital photography'',''Images vector'',''Spreadsheets'',''Text''
Paper Archiverecipient
Norfolk Museums Service
Paper Contents ''other''
Paper Mediaavailable
''Context sheet'',''Plan'',''Report'',''Section''
Projectbibliography 1
Publication typeGrey literature (unpublished document/manuscript)
Title St George's Court, Globe Street, Methwold, Norfolk, IP26 4PQ. ArchaeologicalTrial Trench Evaluation
Author(s)/Editor(s)
Ames, J.
Otherbibliographicdetails
2016/1313
Date 2016
Page 2 of 3OASIS FORM - Print view
14/03/2016http://oasis.ac.uk/form/print.cfm
SUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL
Issuer orpublisher
NPS Archaeology
Place of issue orpublication
Norwich
Entered by a ([email protected])
Entered on 14 March 2016
Page 3 of 3OASIS FORM - Print view
14/03/2016http://oasis.ac.uk/form/print.cfm
SUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL
nps archaeology St George’s Court, Globe Street, Methwold, Norfolk Archaeological Trial Trench Evaluation
Page 50
Appendix 7: Archaeological Specification
SUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL
nps archaeology
01-04-16-2-1313
St George’s Court, Globe St, Methwold, Norfolk, IP26 4PQ
Archaeological Evaluation by Trial Trenching Written Scheme of Investigation
Prepared for: Windsor Architectural
Planning Ref: N/A
February 2016
SUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL
nps archaeology
QUALITY ASSURANCE
Job Number 01-04-16-2-1313
Client Windsor Architectural
Location St George’s Court, Globe Street, Methwold, IP26 4PQ, Norfolk
District King’s Lynn and West Norfolk
Planning Reference N/A
Grid Reference TL 73015 95006
Compiled Ben Philip Hobbs 05-02-2016
Reviewed David Adams 08-02-2016
Issue 1
Revised Andrew Crowson 09-02-2016
Issue 2
Disclaimer This document has been prepared in good faith on the basis of information available at the date of publication without any independent verification for the exclusive use and benefit of the named client and for the sole purpose for which it is provided. NPS Archaeology does not guarantee the accuracy, reliability, completeness, or currency of the content of this document nor its usefulness in achieving any purpose. This document is not intended to nor should it be relied upon by any third party. NPS Archaeology accepts no responsibility nor liability should this document be used for any alternative purpose other than for which it is intended nor to any third party. NPS Archaeology will not be liable for any loss, damage, cost, or expense incurred or arising by reason of any person using or relying on information in this document.
nps archaeology Scandic House 85 Mountergate Norwich NR1 1PY T 01603 756150 F 01603 756190 E [email protected] W nau.nps.co.uk © NPS Archaeology Ltd 2016, all rights reserved
SUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL
1
Archaeological Evaluation by Trial Trenching
Written Scheme of Investigation
Introduction
Background
1 Proposals to develop land to be known as St George’s Court, off Globe Street, Methwold, Norfolk, IP26 4PQ (centre: TL 73015 95006), require a programme of archaeological work to support and inform the planning application for the site.
2 The area of proposed development (subsequently ‘the site’) has been identified by Norfolk County Council Historic Environment Service (NHES) as potentially containing heritage assets of archaeological interest, primarily because of its position adjacent to—and potentially amongst—an extensive group of earthworks. The earthworks are considered to represent a range of archaeologically important features of likely medieval date, including fishponds, enclosures and tofts (see para. 7).
3 All available historical maps show the site as undeveloped land, and therefore any potential archaeological remains are likely to be undisturbed. It is noted that two east–west field boundaries within the plot, which are visible on modern aerial photography, are in approximate alignment with the fishpond earthworks to the west. Similar division of the site is recorded as early as c. 1840 on the Methwold Tithe map. If earthwork structures extend into, or formerly extended into the site it is considered likely that evidence may survive below ground in the form of archaeological features.
4 There are no records of previously identified archaeological remains at the site and its archaeological potential is not confirmed. However, there is substantial evidence relating to historical human occupation in many of the surrounding fields.
5 A prehistoric flint tool found c. 200m to the north-west and a Neolithic axe head and Bronze Age axe located 200m south of the site provide evidence of prehistoric activity nearby.
6 Other known archaeological assets in the vicinity of the development include the site of an Iron Age–Roman settlement 300m to the north-east, a possible Late Anglo-Saxon foundation church 350m to the south, and Anglo-Saxon and early medieval pottery located 200m to the south.
7 The fishponds, enclosures and other earthwork features noted above extend over a distance of 200m to the southwest and west of the site, and may feasibly be associated with a supposed castle or medieval hall 150m to the south-east of the site. This location is recorded on the 1880 Ordnance Survey map as Old Hall (site of), and the footprint of a substantial building or buildings is clearly visible on a 1946 RAF aerial photograph of the area.
8 In addition, the field 270m to the north-west has produced multi-period finds including artefacts and pottery sherds from the prehistoric, Iron Age, Roman and medieval periods.
9 Archaeological trial trench evaluation at the site will be carried out in line with a generic brief for Archaeological Evaluation by Trial Trenching (Hamilton 2012, updated Dack 2015) issued by NHES, in accordance with the Borough Council of King’s Lynn and
SUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL
2
West Norfolk Core Strategy (adopted July 2011) Policy CS12, and in regard to the principles set out in the National Planning Policy Framework (Department for Communities and Local Government 2012).
10 The objective of the archaeological trial trenching (detailed in the Aims section of this document) is to identify the presence, extent, date, state of preservation and hence significance of any heritage assets at the site. The trial trench evaluation will be sufficient to characterise any heritage assets identified and the results will be assessed by NHES to determine whether further investigations would be necessary should archaeological remains be found at the site which cannot be preserved by design.
11 Windsor Architectural has requested that NPS Archaeology prepares this Written Scheme of Investigation to outline an appropriate programme of archaeological works that will satisfy the NHES requirements for the archaeological trial trenching.
SUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL
3
Aims
12 The Programme of Archaeological Work requested by NHES is required to recover, by archaeological evaluation, information relating to the extent, date, phasing, character, function, status and significance of the site. A determination of the state of preservation of any features, deposits and structures is also required.
13 The aims of the archaeological work may therefore be summarised as:
i. To establish the presence or absence of archaeological remains within the proposed development site.
ii. To determine the extent, condition, nature, quality and date of any archaeological remains occurring within the site and the possible impacts of the proposed development on them.
iii. Ensure that any archaeological features discovered during trial trenching are identified, sampled and recorded.
iv. To establish, as far as possible, the extent, character, stratigraphic sequence and date of archaeological features and deposits, and the nature of the activities which occurred at the site during the various periods or phases of its occupation.
v. To establish the palaeoenvironmental potential of subsurface deposits by ensuring that any deposits with the potential to yield palaeoenvironmental data are sampled and submitted for assessment to the appropriate specialists.
vi. To explore evidence for social, economic and industrial activity.
vii. To disseminate the archaeological data recovered by the evaluation in the form of a report which will provide a basis for any decisions regarding further archaeological intervention and mitigation proposals should they be necessary.
SUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL
4
Method Statement
Introduction
14 A three-stage evaluation strategy will be undertaken to assess the archaeological potential of the proposed development site. The stages of this strategy may be summarised as follows.
i. Trial Trenching. Machine and manual excavation will be employed to investigate the presence, condition, character and date of any sub-surface archaeological deposits and features occurring at the site. Any archaeological features identified will be cleaned and sample excavated to determine function, form and relative date.
ii Post-Fieldwork Processes. The drawn and written stratigraphic/structural record will be cross-referenced and analysed to provide a synthesis of the results of the work. Cleaning and cataloguing of any artefacts and ecofacts recovered will be carried out throughout the duration of the fieldwork. The finds will be cleaned, marked and packaged in accordance with the archive requirements of Norfolk Museums Service.
iii. Report and Archive. The report will describe the results of the trial trenching with data presented in tabular, graphic and appendix form. Copies of the reports will be submitted to the client and to NHES.
15 The procedures and methodology for each of the stages outlined above are described in detail below.
Trial Trenching
16 Trial trenching will be concerned with establishing the condition, character and date of any sub-surface archaeological features and deposits present. Guidelines set out in the documents Standard and guidance for archaeological field evaluation (Chartered Institute for Archaeologists 2014) and Standards for Field Archaeology in the East of England (Gurney 2003) will be followed.
17 The trench evaluation is formulated on a 5% sample of the entire site area. This will consist of five trenches measuring 20m by 1.80m to provide the required sample results and located to provide an efficient distribution of assets to locate potential archaeological features. It is considered that the trench plan attached as Figure 1 will provide for an appropriate investigation of the potential archaeology at the site.
18 Based on information supplied by the client, no known obstructions, Tree Preservation Orders, contamination issues or other constraints are known at the site, but the final locations of some trenches may be determined on the basis of surface or below ground obstructions and Health and Safety considerations identified at the time of the work.
19 The trenches will be set out in relation to the Ordnance Survey National Grid by NPS Archaeology and scanned by CAT prior to excavation.
20 Excavation will be by mechanical excavator equipped with a toothless bucket in 100mm spits until natural geological ground or archaeological deposits are identified.
21 Initial excavation will be undertaken to the top of any undisturbed archaeological deposits or the surface of the underlying natural geological deposits, whichever is the highest. If neither is encountered it may be necessary to excavate to a maximum depth of 1.20m below the present ground surface in line with Health and Safety guidance for trenches with unsupported sides. If further depth of excavation is required, the trench sides may need to be locally stepped or shored. The requirement for and the scope of
SUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL
5
works below 1.20m will be determined by NHES and agreed and costed as a contingency.
22 If the deposits in the trenches extend too deep to evaluate safely, or below the likely level of any development impacts, a hand auger may be used to retrieve information about the characteristics of the lower deposits.
23 The trenches will be fenced around using Netlon high-visibility fencing and applicable warning signs will be displayed where these measures are appropriate.
24 Spoil from the trenches will not be removed from site. The trenches will not be backfilled until agreement to do so is given by NHES. Backfilling will be undertaken by NPS Archaeology and all trenches will be left in a safe condition.
25 Exposed surfaces and archaeological features and deposits will be excavated by hand and screened by metal detector. The metal detector will be utilised to scan excavated spoil and in situ horizons with the operator ensuring that it is used in a correct fashion. All artefacts and ecofacts will be collected and bagged by unique context number.
26 All archaeological deposits, features and layers will be assigned individual context numbers and recorded on standardised forms employing the NPS Archaeology pro forma recording system. The records will include full written, graphic and photographic elements with site and context numbering compatible with the NHES Record numbering system.
27 Plans will be made at a scale of 1:50, with provision for 1:20 and 1:10 drawings. Sections will be recorded at scales of 1:10 and 1:20 depending on the detail considered necessary. A photographic record in 35mm monochrome film and digital formats will be maintained of all archaeological deposits, layers and features to record their characteristics and relationships. Photographs will be taken to record the progress of the evaluation.
28 Human remains will be left in situ unless otherwise instructed by NHES. If any human remains or burials are discovered that must be removed, an application for a Licence for the Removal of Human Remains will be made in compliance with the Burial Acts 1857 and 1981 and all relevant Ministry of Justice guidelines. Backfilling of features containing human remains will be carried out manually to ensure that the remains are appropriately protected from any damage or disturbance.
29 Any finds of gold and silver shall be removed to a safe place and reported to the local coroner according to the procedures set out in the 1996 Treasure Act (and amendments). Where removal cannot be effected on the same working day as the discovery, suitable security measures will be taken to protect the finds from theft. NPS Archaeology will inform NHES and the Portable Antiquities Scheme's Finds Liaison Officer of such discoveries as soon as is reasonably practical.
30 Detailed strategies for levels of sampling of buried soils, structures, pits, post-holes and ditches will be determined on site. Allowance will be made for total recovery where appropriate; percentage sampling will apply in areas where complex stratified deposits are encountered. In general, the feature/deposit sampling strategy will be employed throughout the evaluation in accordance with Standards for Field Archaeology in the East of England (Gurney 2003).
31 Soil samples for palaeoenvironmental materials will be collected if suitable sealed and well-dated deposits are identified. Standard 20 litre bulk soil samples, column or monolith samples and Kubiena tins will be collected from such deposits as appropriate,
SUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL
6
in consultation with the Historic England Science Advisor for the East of England and/or other consultant environmentalists if appropriate. Buried soils will be sampled by sieving to determine artefact densities. In all instances, sampling procedures will follow guidance issued by English Heritage (Historic England) in Environmental Archaeology 2nd edition (2011). Full written, graphic and photographic sample records will be made using NPS Archaeology’s pro forma recording system.
Post-Fieldwork Processes
32 The drawn and written stratigraphic/structural record will be cross-referenced and analysed to provide a synthesis of the results of the work.
33 The cleaning and cataloguing of any artefactual materials recovered will be undertaken on completion of the trial trenching. All retained materials will be cleaned, marked and packaged in accordance with the requirements of Norfolk Museums Service (NMS).
34 Post-fieldwork analyses will start upon completion of the finds processing and will involve the identification and description of the artefactual materials recovered by the relevant specialists. In general, the following strategies will be employed in the analysis of the artefactual materials recovered:
Pottery. Analysed to determine date and tabulated by context unit
Worked flint. Sorted and tabulated by context unit
Metal artefacts. Assessed for dating and significance, catalogued by context unit and where necessary conserved within four weeks of completion of fieldwork, in accordance with UKIC Conservation Guidelines 3 (1984)
Faunal remains. Sorted and tabulated by context unit. Assessed for the potential for further analysis and for sieving for the recovery of smaller bird and fish bones
Environmental samples. Processed and assessed for content and significance
Other categories of artefactual materials will be analysed in a similar fashion.
35 All finds work will follow the procedures set out in Standard and guidance for the collection, documentation, conservation and research of archaeological materials (Chartered Institute for Archaeologists 2014). Finds data will be entered on a spreadsheet to aid analysis and report preparation.
36 All archaeological materials, excepting those covered by the Treasure Act 1996, will remain the property of the landowners. NPS Archaeology will seek to reach formal agreement with the landowners for donation of materials to NMS.
Report and Archive
37 An evaluation report will be prepared that presents the stratigraphic, structural, artefactual and environmental evidence and analyses, and a synthesis of the results of the trial trenching.
38 The report will present data in written, tabular, graphic and appendix form. A list of archive components generated by the work and a reference to the intended place of archive deposition will be included in the report. Unless otherwise agreed in writing, NPS Archaeology will retain copyright in and ownership of all documentation and other
SUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL
7
materials prepared by NPS Archaeology. NPS Archaeology may publish or jointly publish any description or illustration of the works with the prior consent of the client.
39 A draft copy of the report will be presented to the client and to NHES for approval within eight weeks of the completion of the evaluation. An advance (interim) report for the purpose of expediting planning applications may be supplied upon request by the client and by agreement with NHES. Multiple copies of the approved report will be produced as appropriate and presented to the client and one digital and one paper copy to NHES. One copy of the report may be sent to the Historic England Science Advisor for the East of England, if considered appropriate.
40 An online OASIS record will be initiated immediately prior to the start of fieldwork and completed when the final report is submitted to NHES. This will include a pdf version of the final report.
41 A single integrated archive for all elements of the work will be prepared according to the recommendations set out in Environmental standards for the permanent storage of excavated material from archaeological sites (UKIC Conservation Guidelines 3, 1984) and Archaeological Archives: a guide to best practice in creation, compilation, transfer and curation (Brown 2007), and in accordance with NMS requirements for archive preparation, storage and conservation.
42 The archive will be fully indexed and cross-referenced It will also be integrated with the NMS Project accession number and the NHES numbering system. Deposition of the archive and archaeological materials (by prior agreement with the landowners) will take place after completion of the final report and confirmed in writing to NMS. A full listing of archive contents and finds boxes will accompany the deposition of the archive and finds.
43 If NMS are not making new archive accessions and no confirmation is provided of when new archives will be accepted, NPS Archaeology reserve the right to make alternative arrangements. From 1 January 2016 NPS Archaeology may charge for storage of prepared archaeological archives.
SUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL
8
Timetable and Resources
44 The different stages of archaeological work have different time and staff requirements. The timetable for fieldwork assumes that there are no major delays to the work programme caused by factors outside of NPS Archaeology’s reasonable control. Such circumstances would include without limitation: long periods of adverse weather conditions, flooding, repeated vandalism, ground contamination, delays in the development programme, unsafe buildings, conflicts between the archaeological recording methods and the protection of flora and fauna on the site, disease restrictions, and unexploded ordnance.
45 The proposed earliest start date for the archaeological work is one working week upon notification from the client.
46 It is estimated that the fieldwork will take up to one week with a team of three to four archaeologists, dependent on archaeological remains present.
SUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL
9
Project Staff
47 A Project Manager will assume overall responsibility for the delivery of the project. The practical aspects of the project will be co-ordinated by a Senior Project Officer who will be dedicated to the project throughout its duration. The fieldwork will be conducted by a Project Officer who will have substantial experience in trench evaluation and post-excavation analysis.
48 Other members of staff involved in the project will be Experienced Excavators and a Finds Officer. Experienced Excavator staff will have experience in excavation and experience with NPS Archaeology’s pro forma recording system or similar systems. The Project Officer and/or Experienced Excavator staff will be experienced metal detector users.
49 NPS Archaeology staff associated with the project will be:
Project Management
Project Manager Andrew Crowson
Project Staff
Senior Project Officer Peter Crawley
Project Officer Rob Brown
Finds Officer Rebecca Sillwood
Experienced Excavators To be nominated
50 NPS Archaeology reserves the right to change its nominated personnel at any time should project programmes change.
51 The analysis of artefacts and ecofacts will be undertaken by NPS Archaeology or nominated external specialists. Nominated NPS Archaeology and external specialists and their areas of expertise are:
Research Field
Metal-detectorist; numismatic items Andrew Barnett
Worked flint Sarah Bates
Palaeoenvironmental remains; worked stone Frances Green
Faunal remains Julie Curl
Post-Roman ceramics, brick and tile Sue Anderson
Materials conservation Debbie Harris
Metalwork Ian Riddler Rebecca Sillwood
Plant and animal macrofossils Val Fryer
Prehistoric and Roman ceramics Andrew Peachey
SUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL
10
Conditions
52 NPS Archaeology will not commence work until a written order or signed agreement is received from the client. Where the commission is received through an agent, the agent is deemed to be authorised to act on behalf of the client. NPS Archaeology reserve the right to recover unpaid fees for the service provided from the agent where it is found that this authority is contested by said client.
53 NPS Archaeology expect information on any services crossing the site to be provided by the client.
54 A 7.4 hour working day is normally operated by NPS Archaeology, although their agents may work outside these hours.
55 NPS Archaeology expect the client to arrange suitable access to the site for its staff, plant and welfare facilities on the agreed start date.
56 NPS Archaeology expect any information concerning the presence of TPOs and/or protected flora and fauna on the site to be provided by the client prior to the commencement of works and accept no liability if this information is not disclosed. No excavation will take place within 8.00m or canopy width (whichever is the greater) of any trees within or bordering the site.
57 NPS Archaeology shall not be held responsible for any delay or failure in meeting agreed deadlines resulting from circumstances beyond its reasonable control. Such circumstances are detailed in para. 44.
58 Whether or not CDM regulations apply to this work, NPS Archaeology expect the client to provide information on the nature, extent and level of any soil contamination present. Should unanticipated contaminated ground be encountered during the trial trenching, excavation will cease until an assessment of risks to health has been undertaken and on-site control measures implemented. NPS Archaeology will not be liable for any costs related to the collection and analysis of soils or other assessment methods, on-site control measures, and the removal of contaminated soil or other materials from site.
59 Should any disease restrictions be implemented for the area during the evaluation, fieldwork will cease and staff redeployed until they are lifted. NPS Archaeology will not be liable for any costs related to on-site disease control measures and for any additional costs incurred to complete the fieldwork after the restrictions have been removed.
60 NPS Archaeology will not accept responsibility for any tree surgery, removal of undergrowth, shrubbery or hedges or reinstatement of gardens. NPS Archaeology will endeavour to restrict the levels of disturbance of to a minimum but wishes to bring to the attention of the client that the works will necessarily alter the appearance of landscapes and especially gardens.
SUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL
11
Quality Standards
61 All staff employed or sub-contracted by NPS Archaeology will be employed in line with the Chartered Institute for Archaeologists’ Code of Practice.
62 The guidelines set out in the document Standards for Field Archaeology in the East of England (Gurney 2003) that remain current will be adhered to. Provision will be made for monitoring the work by NHES in accordance with the procedures outlined in the document Management of Research Projects in the Historic Environment (MoRPHE) (English Heritage [now Historic England] 2006). Monitoring opportunities for each phase of the project are suggested as follows:
a) during archaeological trial trenching
b) during post-fieldwork analysis
c) upon receipt of the final report
63 A further monitoring opportunity will be provided at the end of the work upon deposition of the integrated archive and finds with NMS.
64 NPS Archaeology operates under a recognised Quality Management System and is accredited with BS EN ISO 9001:2008.
65 NPS Archaeology operates a Project Management System. Most aspects of this project will be co-ordinated by a Project Officer who has the day-to-day responsibility for the successful completion of the project. Overall responsibility for the successful delivery of the project lies with the Archaeology Manager who has responsibility for all of NPS Archaeology's work and ensures the maintenance of quality standards within the organisation.
SUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL
12
Health and Safety
66 NPS Archaeology will ensure that all work is carried out in accordance with NPS Property Consultants Limited's Health and Safety Policy, to standards defined in the Health and Safety at Work, etc. Act 1974 and The Management of Health and Safety Regulations 1992, and in accordance with the health and safety manual Health and Safety in Field Archaeology (SCAUM 2007).
67 A site-specific risk assessment will be prepared for the fieldwork. All staff will be briefed on the contents of the risk assessment and required to read it. Protective clothing and equipment will be issued and used as required.
68 NPS Archaeology will provide copies of NPS Property Consultants Limited's Health and Safety policy on request.
SUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL
13
Insurance
69 NPS Archaeology’s Insurance Cover is:
Employers Liability £5,000,000
Public Liability £50,000,000
Professional Indemnity £5,000,000
70 Full details of NPS Archaeology's Insurance cover will be supplied on request.
SUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL
D
ra
in
6
7
Fish Pond
Fishpond
61
Well
5
4
5
0
5
1
5
7
G
L
O
B
E
S
T
R
E
E
T
N
0 100m
© Crown copyright and database rights 2016 Ordnance Survey 100019340
01-04-16-2-1313 St Georges Court, Globe Street, Methwold. Proposed trench location
5 x 20m x 1.8m trenches
Scale 1:1000 at A4
SUBJECT TO A
PPROVAL