Bio-coal market study: Value chain analysis of bio-coal
business in Finland
Lei Wang
06.06.201306.06.2013
2
Main thesis: primary study results
Primary study results
GENERAL INFORMATION
3
2. Observations Supply Chain members Number of
observations
forest owner 52
Forest management operator 3
Supplier / dealer of biomass 2
Manufacturer of bio-coal 2
Manufacturer of bioenergy products other than bio-coal
3
Industrial consumer of bioenergy 6
Technology and consulting for bioenergy sector
11
Other stakeholder 7
Total 86
4
2. Theoretical framework
5
H1: Political factors are critical in the Finnish biomass utilization.H2: Environmental factors are critical in the Finnish biomass utilization.H3: Technology should be one of the main challenges for the Finnish bio-coal
sector.H4: Cost-profit uncertainty should be one of the main challenges for the Finnish
bio-coal sector.H5: In the current Finnish bio-coal business, the competition is low.H6: Nature characteristics of biomass is an important factor to be considered in
the inbound logistics of bio-coal business.H7: The current Finnish bio-coal business should be focused on a decentralized
model at local level. H8: In the bio-coal VC, support activities and primary activities are interrelated.
2. Hypothesis
6
political factors and environmental factors are the most effective
drivers in the biomass procurement decisions (the average mean
of these two sets are 4.2, and the average mean for economic and
environmental factors are 3.6) H1 & H2 supported
2. Biomass related issues
7
2. Macro environmental driving forces and restrictions
the current Finnish bio-coal business is driven by a mixture of four factors:
profit + resource + customer + policy (23 respondents have choose this
mixture position). H3 & H4 supported
8
2. Macro environmental driving forces and restrictions
Restrictions for the current Finnish bio-coal business Frequency
lack of advanced technology in production, transportation and utilization process 62
low or uncertain profitability 43
lack of innovations in production and application 32
competition due to already established markets for other wood based bioenergy products
32
lack of political support 28
high price of the end product 28
bad image reflecting from mineral coal and traditional charcoal 16
too many wood based bioenergy product options available 10
bio-coal production and transportation is viewed as more environmentally hazardous
7
9
2. Competition
our respondents slightly agree more on the low competition environment in
the Finnish bio-coal sector (the average mean of this set is 3.6, and the
average mean for the high competition set is 3.0) H5supported
10
2. Inbound logistics
physical characteristics of wood biomass and biomass logistic practices are
more important factors in the inbound logistics of bio-coal business (the
average mean of these two sets are above 3.5) than the “production related”
items (the average mean of this set is 3.0) H6 supported
11
2. Supply chain models (current)
More than 50 respondents chosen these two models. Major characteristics of the current Finnish bio-
coal SC are:
1) Depend on local biomass resources;
2) Short biomass transportation distance or longer biomass transportation with additional terminals;
3) Focus on both industrial end-users and private end-users;
4) Prefer direct sales to industrial end-users;
5) Sales to private end-users through intermediaries. H7 supported
12
2. Supply chain models (future)
54 respondents chosen this export model. Major characteristics of the future Finnish bio-coal SC are:
1) larger biomass inventory (whole country biomass resources);
2) biomass terminals are necessary elements;
3) large-scale production;
4) mainly for export markets.
13
2. Marketing
respondents support more for broader products (mean of this variable is 4.2)
than the limited core product (mean of this variable is 2.1); and support more
for horizontal marketing structure (mean of this variable is 4) than the vertical
structure (mean of this variable is 2.8)
14
2. Supply chain operations
The current weak parts of the SC are: production of bio-coal, marketing &
sales of bio-coal, and harvesting & collecting of biomass. H3 & H4
supported
Weak chains in the bio-coal supply chain
15
2. Pricing
In order to lower the cost, significant changes should be made in the logistic
and production related operations. (average of these two sets are close to 4)
16
2. Interrelationship between support activities and primary activities
17
there are significant interrelationships between support and primary activities.
The clear implication here is to stress the importance of the “linkages”
between activities
we identified the effective drivers for the bio-coal business in Finland: political
and environmental factors are critical drivers; and technology and cost-profit
uncertainty are the major challenges.
this study defined a “low competition” in the current bio-coal business in
Finland, which implies possibilities of the market entrance for the Finnish and
international companies.
we identified the current Finnish bio-coal model is decentralized model at local
level, which means localized production of bio-coal based on localized
biomass supply and bio-energy demand.
1. Conclusion
18
THANKS!