BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality.
Managing Your Audit
Effective Preparation to Successful Certification
John KukolyBRC Global Standards
BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality. BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality.
Agenda
• Preparing for the audit• Managing the audit• Non-conformities• Corrective Action• Root Cause Analysis
BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality. BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality.
Intent of the Audit
• Gather evidence of conformance• Identification of risks or non-
compliance• Opportunity for improvement• Certification
BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality. BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality.
The AuditWhat Happens
• Arrival• Opening meeting• Document review• Site review• Interviews• Evidence documented• Closing meeting• Corrective actions to lose NC’s• Certification or report
BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality. BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality.
Preparing for the AuditLong Term Planning
• When do you want the audit• Who is performing the audit• Who will be involved• Practice with employees• Use internal auditing – continual
practice through living it
BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality. BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality.
5 Best Things to Do
• Assign responsibility to departments, manage through senior management
• Train and inform everyone• Get good at internal auditing• Look for help• Organize, and anticipate
BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality. BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality.
Worst Things to Do
• “it’s a QC responsibility”• “leave something for the auditor”• “we’ve been auditor before”• Try to misdirect or hide• Stopping after the audit• Unrealistic expectations• Lack of preparation
BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality. BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality.
Preparing for the AuditWho is Involved
• All staff• QC, QA, production• Pest control• Maintenance, purchasing, receiving,
shipping, • Reception• Setting senior management
expectations
BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality. BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality.
Preparing for the AuditShort Term
• Preparing materials• Last minute efforts• Running the business while the audit
happens• Informing staff• Service suppliers
BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality. BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality.
Preparing for the AuditLogistics for the Day
• Opening meeting• Protective equipment• Taking care of the auditor• Runners• Daily recap• Closing meeting
BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality. BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality.
The Audit
• What to offer• Gaining clarity on issues• Arguing your position• Defending your facility• Providing evidence, documents and
materials• Failures during the audit• Managing the auditor
BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality. BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality.
The AuditTiming of Events
• Gaining understanding• Training• Implementation• Pre-assessment• Audit• Corrective actions• Communications
BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality. BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality.
During the Audit - DO
• Anticipate and provide• Show off where you do things well or
good results• Lead the audit• Question and ask for explanation• Expect breakdowns, let the process
take over
BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality. BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality.
During the Audit – DON’T
• Waste time or stall• Hide, misdirect, show partial
information• Interrupt interviews or audit flow• Expect a perfect result• Argue every point, or where evidence
does not support
BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality. BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality.
Dealing with problems
• Appeals• Debates• Disagreements
BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality. BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality.
The Auditor
• Getting the most out of the auditor• Understand their role, needs and
position• Provide space and time when needed• Unacceptable auditor activities
BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality. BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality.
Most common NC’s Document ControlGlass ControlHygieneChemical ControlCorrective ActionRecall TestDoorsTemporary RepairsWallsRecord ControlHACCP Plan
BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality. BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality.
Document Control
• Version control• Consistency across documents• Complete information and instructions• Tracked changes, with reason• Uncontrolled documents
BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality. BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality.
Glass Control
• Relevant complete list• Condition• Appropriate checks• Complete procedure for loss or
breakage
BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality. BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality.
Correction and Corrective Action
• Immediate actions to protect product integrity
• Short term corrective action• Corrective action• Root cause analysis• Everyone knows and uses it!
BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality. BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality.
Hygiene - Cleaning
• Non production areas• Deep assessments • Procedures• Verification and validation
BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality. BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality.
Chemical Control
• Cabinets• Unapproved chemicals• Secret stashes, uncontrolled
materials• Over the counter products
BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality. BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality.
Corrective Action
• Missing for documented non-conformities
• Incomplete corrective actions• No corrective action in procedure• Not following procedure
BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality. BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality.
Recall Test
• Packaging• Once, or twice annually?• Unacceptable ranges or results• Full trace test, finished product, and
ingredients
BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality. BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality.
Doors
• Condition• Seals
BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality. BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality.
Temporary Repairs
• Extended times• Not tracked• Creates new risks
BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality. BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality.
Walls
• Condition• Temporary construction becomes
permanent• Poor choice of materials
BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality. BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality.
Record Control
• Inaccessible• Review performed as required?• Unidentified errors
BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality. BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality.
HACCP Plan
• Missed risks• Diagram not representative• Not up to date
BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality. BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality.
Root Cause Analysis
• Define Root Cause Analysis• Improve understanding of the requirement for
RCA• Understand how to undertake Root Cause
Analysis• Perform a Root Cause Analysis
BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality. BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality.
Root Cause The underlying cause of the problem which, if successfully addressed, will prevent a recurrence of that problem.
Corrective Action (Immediate Corrective Action)
Action taken to manage a non-conformity (the non-conformity may originate from any source, e.g. a product incident, site audit or product testing). Corrective action should be completed as soon after detecting the non-conformity as possible.
Corrective Action Plan
Following an audit, sites in the Enrolment Programme are required to develop a Corrective Action Plan which outlines the non-conformities and the action that has/will be taken to address the non-conformity.
Definitions
BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality. BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality.
Following root cause analysis, the site must develop a proposed action plan to correct each of the root causes, such that they prevent recurrence of the non-conformity.
Proposed Action Plan
Preventative Action
Root cause analysis can identify a cause that indicates other systems or that are susceptible to the same failure. In these situations it is good practice to complete preventative action on the implicated systems before a non-conformity actually occurs.
Definitions
Causal Factors are any behaviour, omission, or deficiency in the process that if corrected, eliminated, or avoided probably would have prevented the non-conformity.
Causal Factor
BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality. BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality.
Good Solutions
• Most problems are systemic• Don’t jump to conclusions• Are separate from immediate
corrective action• Diagnose and address the illness• Eliminate the cause(s)• Prevent re-occurrence
BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality. BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality.
Symptom
Symptom
Symptom
Cause or
causes
Identifying the cause
BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality. BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality.
What is the aim of RCA?
Identification of the root cause
Implementation of suitable action
The key question: What in the system or process failed such that this problem could occur?
Ultimately, the point of a RCA is to improve the systems such that a repetition of the incident is prevented
Verification & monitoring activity demonstrates that the action has been effective
BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality. BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality.
Factors in Corrections
• Stop the problem• Identify the scope of the impact• Correction (clean up the mess)• Corrective action• Root cause analysis
BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality.
Step 5Verification & Monitoring of Effectiveness
Step 1Define the Non-Conformity
Step 3Create Proposed Action Plan & Define Timescales
Step 4Implement Proposed Action
Step 2Investigate the Root Cause(s)
Process overview
BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality. BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality.
Asking the Right Questions
OPEN • Who?• What? • Where?• Why?• When?• How?
PROBINGCLOSED
• To drill further into specifics
• To check understanding
BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality. BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality.
There is no single prescribed method of conducting root cause analysis.
The choice of root cause methodology may be:
• Matter of personal choice • Company policy • Dependent on the type of non-conformity being
investigated
The Methods
BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality. BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality.
SOME RCA Methods
• The 5 Whys• Fishbone (Ishikawa) Diagram• Cause and Effect• Pareto’s Principle
BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality. BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality.
The investigator keeps asking the question ‘Why?’ until meaningful conclusions are reached.
It is important to ensure that the questions continue to be asked until the real cause is identified rather than a partial conclusion.
Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Root Cause
Once you have asked ‘why?’ you need to prove the answer by either gathering data or objective evidence.
5 Whys?
BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality. BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality.
Investigation Techniques
• Interview personnel• Observe the process• Try the process• Conduct specific inspections• Review the system data• Specific testing if necessary
BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality. BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality.
For example:
• An operator is instructed to perform a simple action ‘weigh out
ingredient A’.
• The operator inadvertently used ingredient B.
• An immediate reaction = operator error was the cause.
• This does not establish the reason why the error occurred or
prevent it happening in future.
• The root cause analysis insists that a series of ‘Why?’s are asked.
5 Whys?
BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality. BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality.
a. Why did the operator make the error? Operator unfamiliar with procedure.
b. Operator trained but no supervision or sign off to confirm training was satisfactory.
Why Is that?
c. Why was the training not satisfactory? Both ingredients look identical and were not labelled.
Why Is that?
d. Labels were removed during the last clean and not replaced.
Why Is that?
e. Cleaners didn’t consider potential for error & checking labels not part of anyone’s duties.
Why Is that?
An operator should have weighed out ingredient A on line 2. However inadvertently used ingredient B. Why is this happening?
5 Whys?
BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality. BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality.
Fishbone or Ishikawa Diagram
BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality. BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality.
A second commonly used method of root cause analysis, is the fishbone. This is most useful when the ‘5 whys’ is too basic diagrams.
This type seeks to understand the possible causes by asking:‘What’, ‘When?’, ‘Where?’ ‘Why?’, ‘How?’ and ‘So what?’ A possible cause is identified and the consequences are investigated for each of the group categories.
Primary Cause
Secondary Cause
Equipment Process People
Materials Environment Management
EFFECT
Ishikawa
BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality. BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality.
PeopleEquipmentEnvironment
ProcessMaterialsManagement
An operator should have weighed out ingredient A. However inadvertently used ingredient B.
Checking the labels didn’t form part of anyone’s duties.
Significance of delay & the potential for an error not considered by cleaners.
Labels were removed during the previous clean and not replaced.
Operator unfamiliar with procedure.
Both ingredients looked identical and were not labelled.
Incomplete training procedure for cleaners.
Operator trained but no sign off.
BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality. BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality.
Pareto Principle
20% Causes80% Problems
• Not a tool for Root Cause Analysis
• A tool for determining where to start your analysis
BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality. BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality.
PeopleEquipmentEnvironment
ProcessMaterialsManagement
An operator should have weighed out ingredient A. However inadvertently used ingredient B.
Checking the labels didn’t form part of anyone’s duties.
Significance of delay & the potential for an error not considered by cleaners.
Labels were removed during the previous clean and not replaced.
Operator unfamiliar with procedure.
Both ingredients looked identical and were not labelled.
Incomplete training procedure for cleaners.
Operator trained but no sign off.
BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality. BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality.
Update training procedure to ensure sign off (& possibly a supervision step).
Replace ingredient labels – if practical with ones that cannot be removed.
If labels must occasionally be removed, ensure that post cleaning line checks include a check of signage.
Ensure an individual is authorised and responsible for post-cleaning line sign off.
Ensure cleaners fully understand and are trained in the need to return labelling (and all equipment) in a fully operational state.
Proposed Action Plan
BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality. BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality.
Unmanageable ConclusionsRoot cause analysis should
lead to controllable, manageable or adjustable
processes.
Duplication of the Corrective Action
The purpose of root cause analysis is to look beyond the
immediate non-conformity.
PeopleThe true root cause establishes what system, policy or process
allowed the human error.
Proposed Action Plan Doesn’t Prevent Re-occurrence
It may be necessary to re-visit and identify additional causes
and appropriate controls.
Extra ChecksExtra checks are often required for verification or monitoring, it is
preferable that the proposed action plan is not solely an extra check.
Common mistakes
BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality. BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality.
Proposed action plan That prevents
re-occurrence of the non-conformity is in place.
Preventive ActionWhat other systems exist that might have the same
root cause present?
Proposed Corrections Have been taken.
VerificationDemonstrates
non-conformity can no longer occur.
What does success look like
BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality. BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality.
RCA and BRC Global StandardsFood Standard Issue 6:
Clause Requirement
1.1.10 Senior management to ensure the root cause of audit non-conformities have been effectively addressed to prevent recurrence.
3.7.1 Identification of the root cause of non-conforming products and implementation of any necessary corrective action.
3.10.1 Root cause analysis and associated actions relating to customer complaints.
Audit Protocol
9.2 & 9.2.2
Following an audit, the root cause of non-conformities shall be identified and an action plan to correct this, including timescales, must be provided to the Certification Body.
Consumer Products Standard Issue 32.4.2 Review of risk assessment and evaluation of complaints / incidents3.7.4 Corrective actions and prevention of re-occurrence
3.12.4 Analysis of complaint dataPackaging Standard (Issue 4)
There are no requirements for root cause analysis in the Packaging Standard, but sites are required to state “corrective action taken (with consideration of root cause)” in the audit report.
BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality. BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality.
Consider…
• Could it have been prevented from happening?
• Could it have been identified earlier?
• Known’ s and unknowns…
BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality. BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality.
How should RCA appear in the audit report?
Audit report
BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality. BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality.
Real Examples
BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality. BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality.
Real Examples
BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality. BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality.
Real Examples
BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality. BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality.
Real Examples
BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality. BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality.
Real Examples
BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality. BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality.
Your Examples for RCA
Questions?
BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality.
www.brcglobalstandards.com