Transcript
Page 1: C152 Landing Light Switch Failures

ASL4/2010 17

maintenance and certificationSmoke in the Cabin—Landing Light Switch Failure ..................................................................................................... page 17Canada-U.S. Bilateral Aviation Safety Agreement ........................................................................................................ page 19

Smoke in the Cabin—Landing Light Switch FailureThe following occurrence resulted in two aviation safety advisories from the Transportation Safety Board of Canada (TSB).

BackgroundOnSeptember24,2007,aCessna152aircrafttookofffromtheOshawaMunicipalAirport,Ont.,withthepilotandpassengeronboard,destinedtoKingston,Ont.Justafterclearingthecontrolzone,thepilotandpassengernoticedanelectricalodourandobservedasmallfireandsmokeemanatingfromthebottomoftheleftdashpanelwheretheaircraftlightingswitcheswerelocated.Thepassenger,sittingintherightfrontseat,reachedforanddischargedthefireextinguisher.Thefirewasquicklyextinguished,buttheextinguishingagentcloudedthecockpit,reducingvisibility.Thecockpitwindowswereopenedandvisibilityimprovedconsiderably.TheaircraftreturnedtotheOshawaairportandlandedwithoutfurtherincident.Thepilotsufferedaminorburntohislegwhentheplasticinstrumentpanelmeltedanddrippedontohisjeans.TheTSBissuedFinalReport A07O0264onJanuary 14, 2009,regardingthisoccurrence.

Front of instrument panel

TheTSBdeterminedthatthelandinglightswitchinstalledintheoccurrenceaircraftwasbeyonditsdesigncapabilityandthereforewasunsuitableforthecircuititwascontrolling.Excessiveheatfromarcingandoxidizationwithintheswitchweakenedtheswitchstructureandcontactsupport,allowingthecontactstofalloutorbeexposed.Arcingfromthecontactscausedoilresiduetoflash,whichignitedanearbydustaccumulationandstartedthefire.Combustionwassustainedbytheplasticinstrumentpanel.TheTSBstatedthatsimilarlandinglightswitchsystemsareincorporatedonmost

oftheCessna 100-seriesaircraft,therebyincreasingthelikelihoodofasimilarevent.TheTSBissuedtwoaviationsafetyadvisoriesasaresultoftheirinvestigation.

Advisory No. 1: Landing light switch failureThelandinglightelectricalcircuitiscomposedofa15-amppush-to-resetcircuitbreakerinserieswithasinglepole,singlethrowrockerswitch,whichisinserieswitha28 VDC250-wattincandescentlamp.Theswitchandthecircuitbreakerarelocatedonthelowerinstrumentpaneltotherightofandabovethepilot’skneewhenseatedintheleft-handseat.Theengineoilpressureandtemperaturegaugesarelocateddirectlyabovethelandinglightswitch.Theoilpressuregaugeisconnectedtotheoil-carryingpressureline,whichisdirectlyconnectedtotheengine.Thistypeofcircuitandinstrumentpanellayoutarecommonamongstthe100-series Cessnaaircraft.

Theswitchwasidentifiedasarocker-styleswitchratedat10A250VAC,15A125VAC,3/4HP125-250VAC.NoDCratingswerefoundforthisswitch.Theswitchshowedevidenceofmeltdamagebeginningatthebaseandprogressingupwardonbothsides.Thesamedamagewasevidentontheinterioroftheswitch.Theswitchexteriorhadathickcoatingofdustandanoilyresidue,whichwasalsofoundinsidetheswitch.Ascanningelectronmicroscope (SEM)andenergydispersivespectroscopy (EDS)analysisoftheresidueindicatedthatitmighthavebeenengineoil.

Thelandinglightcircuitwiresremainedattachedtothecontactbutshowedevidenceoffiredamagenearwherethecontactenterstheswitch.Thecontactwascoatedwiththeplasticcasingmaterialandwhenthesurfacewasexaminedtherewasevidenceofrepeatedarcing,whichhadseverelyerodedthecontact’ssurface.Arcingwithinthelandinglightswitchcouldhaveprovidedtheignitionsourcenecessaryforafiretostart.Thedustcoveringevidentontheswitchandtheoilresidueprovidedbypossibleseepagefromtheoilpressuregaugelinelocatedabovetheswitchmayhaveprovidedthekindlingnecessarytostartafire.Theoilwouldconsistentlyreachitsflashpointwhenexposedtoarcing,andwhenitwasinproximitytothedustitwouldcausethedusttoignite.Asmallsectionoftheplasticinstrumentpanelwastestedforflammabilitybyintroducingadirectflametothe

Maintenance and

Certification

Recently Released TSB

Repo

rtsRece

ntly

Rel

ease

d T

SB R

eport

sM

aint

enan

ce a

nd C

ertif

icat

ion

Regulatio

ns and Yo

uReg

ulat

ions

and

Yo

uA

ccident Syno

psesA

ccid

ent

Syno

pse

s

Owner
Text Box
http://www.tc.gc.ca/media/documents/ca-publications/tp185e_4_2010.pdf Downloaded 5 November 2010
Owner
Highlight
Owner
Highlight
Owner
Highlight
Owner
Highlight
Page 2: C152 Landing Light Switch Failures

18 ASL4/2010

plastic.Thepieceofpanelreadilyignitedandsustainedflame.Italsoproducedgasesthatwerequiteharshwheninhaled,andwithoutsufficientventilationmaycausesomeincapacitationtothepilot.

AccordingtotheU.S.FederalAviationAdministration (FAA)AdvisoryCircular43.13-1B,chapter11(pages 11–17),becauseoftheinitialcurrentencounteredbyswitchescontrolling28 VDClamploads (incandescentlamps),theswitchesshouldhaveaderatingfactorof8.Thisaircraft’sswitchcontrolsa250-wattlampinacircuitpoweredby28 VDC,andshouldhaveaminimumDCcurrentratingof71 amps.TheswitchfromtheaircrafthadanACrating.TheAdvisory Circularhasawarningthatreads“Do not use AC derated switches in DC circuits. AC switches will not carry the same amperage as a DC switch.”Theswitchmanufacturerwascontactedandprovidedwiththelandinglightcircuitandswitchinformation.Afterevaluatingtheinformation,theyconfirmedthattheswitchwasnotdesignedtohandlethelamploads described.Thecircuitbreakerwasidentifiedasa15-amppush-to-resetcircuitbreaker (CB),CessnapartnumberS1360-15L.ThepurposeoftheCBinthecircuitistoprotectthe circuitwiring,notthecomponentsattachedtothewiring.The15-ampthermal-typeCBwasfoundtobesuitableforthecircuit.TheCBdidnottripaftertheoccurrencebut,beingthethermal-typeofCB,itdoesnotreactinstantaneouslytoanover-currentcondition.Thisfeatureisnecessarybecausewhenthelightswitchisselected“ON”,theinitialcurrentcanbeashighas15 timesitsratedload.IftheCBweretoreactinstantly

to theinitialcurrentitwouldtripeverytimetheswitchwasselected“ON”.

AsearchoftheFAA’sservicedifficultyreport (SDR)databasebytheTSBrevealed23 eventssimilartothisoccurrence.Thecommontermswere:smellorsmokeincockpit,landinglightswitchhot,landinglightswitcharcing,landinglightswitchmelted,andcircuitbreakerdid nottrip.

Duetothenumberoftheseaircraftpresentlyinuseworldwide,includinginflighttrainingschools,thepossibilitythatthistypeofeventmayrecuronaircraftthathavetheAC-ratedlandinglightswitchinstalledcannotbediscounted.Ifthistypeofeventweretooccurtoaninexperiencedpilot,ortoastudent-pilotonasoloflight,thepilot’sattentioncouldbedivertedfromflyingtheaircrafttofocusonextinguishingthefire,withpossibledireconsequences.

TheTSBsuggestedthatTransport Canada (TC),inco-ordinationwiththeFAAandtheaircraftmanufacturer,maywishtotakeactiontomitigateoreliminatethethreatoffirecausedbyAC-ratedswitchesinthelandinglightDCcircuitofCessna152 aircraft.

Advisory No. 2: Smoke-in-cabin emergency proceduresThepilotandpassengerfollowedtheemergencyproceduresforanelectricalfireinthecabin,asperthepilot’soperatinghandbook (POH).Theprocedureswereperformedfrommemoryonly.Actingontheirowninstincts,theydecidedtoopenthetwocabinwindowstoquicklyimprovevisibilityandimproveairqualityintheconfinedareaofthecockpit.Theirquickactionsweresuccessfulandthepilotwasabletore-channelhisfullattentiontosafelyflyingtheaircraftbacktotheairport.

Reportedcasesofsmokeinthecockpitaboundinvarioustypesofgeneralaviation (GA)aircraftworldwide.Apilot’sabilitytoflytheaircraftsafelyisdegradedbythepresenceofsmokeandextinguishingagentsinthecockpit.Takingactiontoremovethesmokeandfumesfromextinguishingagentswouldincreasevisibilityandimprovetheairqualitywithintheaircraft.

Toensurethatpilotscanquicklyeliminatesmokeandextinguishingagentfumesfromthecockpit,furtherchecklistorproceduralitemsmayberequired.TheTSBthereforesuggestedthatTC,inconcertwithmanufacturersandtheregulatoryauthoritiesofothercountries,maywishtoreviewemergencychecklistproceduresdealingwithsmokeandfireonGAaircraftandtoincludeanadditionalsteptoeliminatesmokeor fumes.

Maintenance and

Certification

Recently Released TSB

Repo

rtsRece

ntly

Rel

ease

d T

SB R

eport

sM

aint

enan

ce a

nd C

ertif

icat

ion

Regulatio

ns and Yo

uReg

ulat

ions

and

Yo

uA

ccident Syno

psesA

ccid

ent

Syno

pse

s

Rear of instrument panel

Owner
Highlight
Owner
Highlight
Owner
Highlight
Owner
Highlight
Owner
Highlight
Owner
Highlight
Page 3: C152 Landing Light Switch Failures

ASL4/2010 19

Safety action takenTCcontactedtheFAA,theauthorityforthestateofdesign,requestingtheirpositionandpossiblecorrectiveaction.TheFAAapproachedCessnawhodevelopedacorrectiveactionplan.

Landing light switchTheFAAtookactiontomitigateoreliminatethethreatoffirecausedbyAC-ratedswitchesinthelandinglightDCcircuitofCessna 152aircraft.Cessnaco-operatedwiththeFAAbyissuingMandatoryServiceBulletinsMEB09-3andSEB09-6datedMay 11, 2009,toremoveandreplaceallsubjectswitchesusedinthelandinglightaswellasthetaxilightandrotatingbeaconcircuitsinthe100-,200-and300-seriesCessnamodelswithservicelifegreaterthanfouryears.ThisincludestheCessna 152-seriesaircraft.Thesebulletinsaretobeaccomplishedwithinthenext400 hoursofoperation,or12 calendarmonths,whichevercomesfirst.Areviewofthedatabaseshowslessthan1percentofthefleethasbeenaffectedbythistypeoffailure.Therefore,theFAA’scourseofactionhasbeentodisseminatetheconcernbyissuingaSpecialAirworthinessInformationBulletin (SAIB)CE-09-42,whichisavailableatwww.faa.gov/aircraft/safety/alerts/SAIB/.

Smoke-in-cabin emergency proceduresTheFAAtookactionbyreviewingtheemergencychecklistproceduresdealingwithsmokeandfirein

GAaircraftandincludingadditionalstepstoeliminatesmokeorfumes.TheFAA’scourseofactionhasbeentodisseminatethisinformationbyissuingSAIBCE-10-04,whichisavailableatwww.faa.gov/aircraft/safety/alerts/SAIB/.ItrecommendsthatownersandoperatorschecktheirPOHoraircraftflightmanual (AFM)andaddastatement:“toremovesmokeandfumesfromthecockpit,dothefollowing…”IfsuchastatementdoesnotexistintheirPOHorAFM,ownersandoperatorsareencouragedtocontacttheaircraftmanufacturerforchecklistinstructionsfortheremovalofsmokeorfumesfromthecockpit (e.g.closingoropeningheating,air-conditioning,orairvents).

ConsideringtheFAA’sissuanceofthecorrespondingSAIBandthatCessnahasforwardedtheapplicableserviceinformationtoallsubscribersofsuchpublications,TChasnottakenanyadditionalactionatthistime.

In closing, TC would like to remind the community that defects, malfunctions and failures occurring on aeronautical products should be reported to Transport Canada, Continuing Airworthiness in accordance with CanadianAviationRegulation (CAR) 521 mandatory SDR requirements. These reports will serve as supporting documentation to present to the authority for the state of design or the manufacturer when corrective action is necessary.  

Canada-U.S. Bilateral Aviation Safety Agreementby Joel Virtanen, Civil Aviation Safety Inspector, Maintenance and Manufacturing, Standards, Civil Aviation, Transport Canada

IthasrecentlycometoTransportCanadaCivilAviation’s (TCCA)attentionthatmoreawarenessisrequiredontheimpactofinternationalagreementsontheCanadianaviationindustry.ThisarticlewillhelpaddressthisconcernbyfocusingontheCanada-U.S.BilateralAviationSafetyAgreement (BASA),itsassociatedmaintenanceimplementationprocedures (MIP),andhowtheyapplytoaviationprofessionalsinCanada.

OnJune 12, 2000,CanadaandtheUnited StatessignedtheBASAanddesignatedtheirrespectivecivilaviationauthoritiesastheexecutiveagentsforitsimplementation.TheAgreementcanbeviewedat:www.tc.gc.ca/eng/civilaviation/standards/int-baa-usa-2000-3676.htm.

TheBASAprovidesfor,amongotherthings,thereciprocalacceptanceofairworthinessapprovalsandenvironmentaltestingandapprovalofcivilaeronauticalproducts,aswellasapprovalsandmonitoringofmaintenance,alterationand/ormodificationfacilities,maintenancetrainingorganizations,andmaintenance personnel.

ArticleIII (B)oftheBASArequiredthattheU.S.FederalAviationAdministration (FAA)andTCCA—beingtheexecutiveagentsfortheParties—draftwrittenmethodsbywhichsuchreciprocalacceptanceswouldbemade.ThisdocumentedprocessisreferredtoastheImplementationProceduresgenerally,andthedetailedprocedureforthereciprocalacceptanceofmaintenanceactivitiesandpersonnelisdescribedintheMIP.TheMIPcanbeviewedat:www.tc.gc.ca/eng/civilaviation/standards/int-ta-usaimp2006-menu-3700.htm.

TheobjectiveoftheMIPistooutlinethetermsandconditionsunderwhichtheFAAandTCCAcanaccepteachother’sinspectionsandevaluations,includingFAA-approvedFederal Aviation Regulations (FARs)Part 145repairstationsandCanadianapprovedmaintenanceorganizations (AMO).TheMIPalsoappliestoFAA-certificatedairmenandCanadianaircraftmaintenanceengineers (AME).Asaresult,thefindingsofcomplianceandregulatoryoversightbyeitheragencywillbeacceptedbytheotheragency.Thiswillleadtoareductioninredundantinspectionswithoutadverselyaffectingaviation safety.

Maintenance and

Certification

Recently Released TSB

Repo

rtsRece

ntly

Rel

ease

d T

SB R

eport

sM

aint

enan

ce a

nd C

ertif

icat

ion

Regulatio

ns and Yo

uReg

ulat

ions

and

Yo

uA

ccident Syno

psesA

ccid

ent

Syno

pse

s

Owner
Highlight