Can Renewable Energy Solve the Climate Problem?
Geoffrey HealColumbia Business School
October 2010
1
Two steps to stabilizing climate
• End deforestation• Decarbonize world’s electric power supplies– Deforestation causes 15-20% of GHG emissions
and can be stopped tomorrow with no new technologies, no massive investments
– Really is the low-hanging fruit
2
Two steps to a stable climate
• 56% of CO2 comes from fossil fuel use of which electricity generation produces about 38% in total
• But with clean electricity we can replace most other fossil fuels – e.g. electric cars, heating, cooling, process heat
• So: if we can fix forests and electricity we can fix the problem
3
Carbon-free power• Technologies available – – Wind– Solar
• PV • Thermal
– Nuclear– Geothermal– Wave– Fuel cells– CCS– Biofuels
4
5
6 6
Levelized Cost of Electricity lcoe
• Constant price p per kWh at which the operation would just break even over its lifetime (assumed 40 years) where r is discount rate
6
(Capx Opex)t1 r t
p *KWH t
1 r t1
40
1
40
7 7
Levelized Cost of Electricity
• Want the p at which PV of revenues = PV of costs: so lcoe is
• Sensitive to discount rate and to assumed life• A long-run marginal cost
7
p
(Capx Opex)t1 r t
KWH t
1 r t
8
Base Load vs Load-Following
• Base load is the level below which demand never falls – level at night in the season (usually winter) when demand is lowest
• Load-following energy (dispatchable energy) is provided to follow the demand up and down during the day– Base load typically coal or nuclear – big plants
never turned off– Load-following is gas or diesel or renewable
9 99
Figures from NREL. Much capacity is only used in summer.Some of that is only used for a few hours each day.Plants only used for a few hours daily in summer have highLCOE. NYC summer peak power may cost $2kWh
Texas load curves summer and winter
Base load
Cost Structures
• Fossil fuels (ff) have capital costs and fuel and operating costs – Coal – capital $1750/kW and then $40-$60/ton
coal– 2000 MW coal plant might cost $3.5b capital costs
and 10,000 tons coal daily – 25,000 tons CO2 daily - $0.5m coal daily = $182.5m annually or $7.3b over the life of the plant
– CO2 costs > = coal costs
10
Cost Structures
• For electricity generation main fossil fuels are coal and gas.
• Prices fluctuate – – Driven by business cycle– Gas prices driven down by new discoveries of tight
gas– Some scope for green paradox here – but effect
reduced by renewable mandates such as US RPS
11
Cost Structures
• Wind - $2,000kW and no operating or fuel costs
• 1gW wind farm costs $2b– Why is wind not cheaper than coal?
• Capacity factor – a 3MW turbine only produces 3MW when the wind blows > 20kph
• Generally turbines produce 0.3-0.4 of their max rated power – the capacity factor
12
Cost Structures
• Capacity factor is critical as it determines how many units of output we can spread the fixed costs over – and operating life too
• Economics of solar PV is similar but more expensive – higher capital costs and lower capacity factor
• Solar thermal is different – heats fluid to make steam and drive a turbine– Can store heat & operate at night by storing hot fluid
13
Cost Structures - Nuclear
• Currently unclear what is cost of new nuke• Capital cost estimates range from $2,500kW
to $10,500kW – Fuel costs are low
• At low end this is competitive but not at the top end
• Nuclear has social costs (melt down risk, proliferation, waste) > renewables
14
15
ENERGY LCOEsTECHNOLOGY ASSUMPTIONS
FEDERALINCENTIVES
STATE INCENTIVES
+ CO2 Tax
>8.4¢/kWhVarious Reactors(MIT 2003,CEEPR
2009)
Loan Guarantees,
Price Anderson, Prod. Tax Credits
Some Tax Incentives, Some Plant constr. cost recovery.
6.2¢/kWhAir-blown PC Gener.
Tech (MIT 2007, 2009)
Incentives Only For Clean Coal
Tech.None
$25/tCO2: 8.3¢kWh
Plus 3-4¢/kWh To Coal
Cost
Coal Plant With CCS Tech
(McKinsey & Co. 2008/Heal)
Government Funds Future-Gen Project
RPS/RECs, Prod., Invest. Tax Incentives
3.6¢/kWh-8.3¢/kWh
CommerciallyMature (MIT 2006)
Electricity Prod., invest. Tax
Credits, Loan Guarantees, etc.
RPS/RECs, Prod. Invest., &
Sales Tax Incentives,
Others
4¢/kWh-7¢/kWh
Utility Scale Turbines (California Energy
Comm. ‘05)
Wind energy tax credit (Federal)
RPS/RECs, Prod., Invest. &
Sales Tax Incentives,
Others
7¢/kWh-15¢/kWh
Utility-Scale Silicon PV
(Solar Advisor Model NREL)
Loan Guarantees,
Energy Grants, Invest. Tax
Credits.
RPS/SRECs, Prod., Invest. &
Sales Tax Incentives,
Others
12¢/kWh-14¢/kWh
CSP W/out Storage (DOE 2007)
Loan Guarantees,
Energy Grants, Invest. Tax
Credits.
RPS/SRECs, Invest., Prod. &
Sales Tax Incentives,
Others
15¢/kWh- 19¢/kWh
Utility-Scale Parabolic-Trough
(Solar Advisor Model NREL)
Loan Guarantees,
Energy Grants, Invest. Tax
Credits.
RPS/SRECs, Invest., Prod. &
Sales Tax Incentives,
Others
6.5¢/kWhGas Powered Plant
(MIT CEEPR May 2009)
None None $25/tCO2: 7.4¢kWh
Nuclear
Coal
CCS
Geo -Thermal
Wind
Solar PV
Solar Thermal
Natural Gas
Solar Thermal W/STRG
Bottom Line
• Wind, geothermal are cost competitive – indeed their social costs are lower than FF
• Solar PV is close to competitive and solar thermal is expected to be < $0.10 shortly– Both types of solar have lower social costs than FF
• So can we expect the replacement of FF by wind, solar?
16
1717
Are Renewables Competitive?
• Incremental capacity in US is now almost all wind or gas (gas has 50% of GHGs of coal)
• Some existing power plants will be refired by gas
• And some gas used as baseload• But large-scale implementation of wind, solar
faces problem of intermittency
18
19 1919
Wind power fluctuates widely ….
From D Mackay, Sustainable Energy – without the hot airwww.withouthotair.com
20 2020
Figures from NREL for Texas. In Spring solar will cut in tobaseload, which is much less expensive and alsocostly to turn up an down. So some solar will bewasted leading to a lower capacity factor. Even whenthe sun shines it may not be possible to sell solar power
Solar output fluctuates too
National Renewable Energy Lab
Intermittency
• Need backup or storage– Currently gas used as backup in US, hydro in EU– Storage from pumped hydro, compressed air
energy storage, both geology-specific– Some grid-scale batteries – 32MWh in S Cal –
emerging technology
• Storage, backup adds to cost – about $0.01kWh
• Can’t provide baseload supply – except solar thermal, geothermal 21
22 2222
Pumped water storage
23 2323
Compressed air energy storage (CAES)
Availability
• Note that wind, solar require large land areas – EU could not meet its electric power needs in its own territory, though US can– Area size of California can generate enough from
solar PV to power entire US
• EU could import from N Africa – DesertEc project – or use nuclear
24
Conclusions
• Electricity could be generated from renewables & gas, greatly reducing CO2, at no extra cost
• Within a decade it may be possible to deploy storage units, reducing use of gas as backup
• Nuclear is CO2-free – but expensive and cannot follow fluctuations in wind output
25
Conclusions
• Decarbonizing will require vast investments – – US electric capacity is 1 Terrawatt– = 1,000,000,000kW @ $2000/kW@40% cap factor– = $5T for generation capacity, plus storage and grid
improvements @ $3m/mile
• About 40% of US GDP – over 2-3 decades• US could go fully renewable (assuming storage)
but EU could not – but could decarbonize with nuclear or renewable imports
26