Aeronautical Testing Service, Inc.
CFD and Wind Tunnel Testing: Complimentary Methods for Aircraft
Design
18820 59th DR NEArlington, WA 98223
USA
Copyright © 2010, Aeronautical Testing Service, Inc.
Background
• Introduction– ATS Company Background
• New and modified aircraft or UAV• Aerodynamic consulting• Wind tunnel testing • Model design and construction
– Personal Background• 14 years experience in wind tunnel
testing• Involved in 30+ wind tunnel tests• 10+ years in CFD• STAR-CCM+ user since V1.08• Primary focus is design work related to
modifications of existing and new aircraft
Copyright © 2010, Aeronautical Testing Service, Inc.
Background – continued
• Research and Design Programs with the University of Washington
– UW Aeronautics and Astronautics Programs• Capstone aircraft design course• Graduate and undergraduate research• UW Kirsten wind tunnel• Lamborghini composites laboratory
– Other Supported UW Programs• Formula SAE • Human Power Submarine
Copyright © 2010, Aeronautical Testing Service, Inc.
Common Uses and Misconceptions of CFD
• Common Uses – Design Development– Control System Analysis (S&C)– High Lift– Icing accumulation– Propulsion– Acoustics– Aeroelastics– And Many More!
• Misconceptions and Misuses– CFD is very fast– CFD is cheap– CFD is an acceptable replacement for wind
tunnel testing– If it comes out of the computer, it has to be
right!
Copyright © 2010, Aeronautical Testing Service, Inc.
Common Uses and Misconceptions of Wind Tunnel Testing
• Common Uses – Development testing– Control System Analysis (S&C)– High Lift– Simulator testing– Icing accumulation– Propulsion (powered testing)– Acoustics– Aeroelastics– Flutter– CFD validation test– And many more!
• Misconceptions and Misuses– Validation of “final” design (often after parts are in
production!)– Wind tunnel testing is too costly– Flight testing is an acceptable replacement
Copyright © 2010, Aeronautical Testing Service, Inc.
Typical Cost of CFD and Wind Tunnel Testing
• What is the “True” Cost of CFD and Wind Tunnel Testing?Estimated Cost For Preliminary Wind Tunnel and CFD Data
Based on ATS Experience and Computer Hardware Availability
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
160000
180000
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600
Data Point
Cost
(US
D)
CFD (2010)Wind Tunnel Test (2010)
Copyright © 2010, Aeronautical Testing Service, Inc.
What Are Some of the Cost Drivers?
• CFD Cost Drivers– Software Costs
• Basic licensing fees• Cost per parallel process (varies depending on software)
– Hardware Costs• Cost per physical cpu core (Total system cost divided by # of cores per
box)
– Operating Costs• Time to solution and time per solution
– Dominated by required mesh size and software capabilities• Power Cost ($ per Kilowatt-hour)
Copyright © 2010, Aeronautical Testing Service, Inc.
What Are Some of the Cost Drivers?
• Wind Tunnel Cost Drivers– Model Cost
• Complexity of model (Number of parts, pressure taps, powered controls, etc.)
• Quality of CAD definition• Time from CAD delivery to model delivery
– Wind Tunnel Costs• Cost per hour of wind tunnel time• Cost for non-standard instrumentation
– Operating Costs• Design of the model• Efficiency of staff• Efficiency of wind tunnel equipment and data reduction tools• Power cost
Copyright © 2010, Aeronautical Testing Service, Inc.
Future Cost Outlook
• What does the cost of CFD and wind tunnel testing look like in the future?
Estimated Cost For Preliminary Wind Tunnel and CFD DataBased on ATS Experience and Computer Hardware Availability
0
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000
300000
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600
Data Point
Cos
t (U
SD) CFD (2010)
Wind Tunnel Test (2010)CFD (2005)CFD (2015)Wind Tunnel Test (2015)
Copyright © 2010, Aeronautical Testing Service, Inc.
What is Changing To Reduce these Costs?
• CFD– Hardware Changes
• Increases in number of cores per socket• Increase in interconnect speeds and decrease in costs
– Software Changes• Software ease of use• Better software integration with other tools (mainly CAD)• Meshing advances
– Mesher is more tolerant of CAD errors (surface wrapper)– Surface wrapper can also be used to rapidly change
overlapping geometry to allow for configuration studies• Licensing changes
– Power session licensing and on-demand computing
Copyright © 2010, Aeronautical Testing Service, Inc.
What is Changing To Reduce these Costs?
• Wind Tunnel Testing– Model Design and Construction
• Model designed for quick model changes (low cost models)
• Powered controls• Reduced cost of hardware (electric motors, servos,
sensors, etc.)• Tooling improvements
– Testing Improvements• Test planning with powered models in mind• Continuous data acquisition
Copyright © 2010, Aeronautical Testing Service, Inc.
Why Does This Matter To A Design Engineer?
• Understanding the cost of the tools we use– Cost per data point for CFD
• Higher cost per data point• Lower initial cost
– Cost per data point for wind tunnel data• Lower cost per data point• Higher initial cost
Copyright © 2010, Aeronautical Testing Service, Inc.
Case Study - 2010 UW Capstone Program
• 2010 Capstone Design Class– Airplane design from RFP to flying prototype
– Follow-on program to 2009 class– Handling qualities and noise research for a supersonic class airliner
– Development cycle of 6 months– Supported by state of the art computational and experimental resources
Copyright © 2010, Aeronautical Testing Service, Inc.
Case Study - 2010 UW Capstone ProgramResources and Limitations
• Two quarter class• Undergraduate students• Software
– Unigraphics NX6– Xfoil, VLAero+, and STAR-CCM+
• Students start with no CAD or CFD experience
• Workstations limited to 4GB or RAM (4 workstations total)
• STAR-CCM+ cases limited to ~4 Million Cells Maximum
• Access to 96 Core Linux cluster at ATS
Copyright © 2010, Aeronautical Testing Service, Inc.
• CFD Data Available On the First Day of Wind Tunnel Test
Case Study - 2010 UW Capstone ProgramComparison of Data
Copyright © 2010, Aeronautical Testing Service, Inc.
• CFD Data Available On the First Day of Wind Tunnel Test (cont.)
Case Study - 2010 UW Capstone ProgramComparison of Data
Copyright © 2010, Aeronautical Testing Service, Inc.
Case Study - 2010 UW Capstone ProgramMethodology
• Students Used Simplest Tools First– Xfoil, VLAERO+, etc.
• CFD is Used Early in Design Cycle– CFD is used as soon as basic geometry is available– Simple 3D wing cases were used to develop planform using STAR-CCM+– Half and Full model STAR-CCM+ cases are run after the preliminary planform and
basic configuration are selected– After basic configuration is selected STAR-CCM+ is used for detailed nacelle design
• Wind Tunnel Testing is Done As Early As Practical– Wind tunnel testing is expected but only after initial concepts are investigated and
reduced to most promising design– Testing is more focused but model and schedule allow for development work– Commercial cost of wind tunnel model would be approximately $45K– Approximately four weeks from CAD definition to final model
• CFD and Wind Tunnel Testing Are Integrated Parts of the Design Cycle– Strengths of each tool are exploited at the proper time and area in the design cycle
Copyright © 2010, Aeronautical Testing Service, Inc.
Case Study #2 - Estimation of Downwash for High Powered Propeller Driven Airplane
• Equilibrium and static longitudinal stability can be seriously affected
by the downwash at the horizontal tail
• Downwash at the tail is driven by the wing and propeller affects
• Handbook methods can estimate wing contribution reasonably well for preliminary design but do not estimate propeller contribution well
• Propeller contribution to downwash can be large in high powered aircraft
• Measuring downwash in the wind tunnel requires a powered model and multi-hole probe
Copyright © 2010, Aeronautical Testing Service, Inc.
• First Problem: Can CFD Accurately Predict Propeller Performance?
Case Study #2 - Estimation of Downwash for High Powered Propeller Driven Airplane
Copyright © 2010, Aeronautical Testing Service, Inc.
• Using Rigid Body Motion STAR-CCM+ Results Agree Well With Experiment
Case Study #2 - Estimation of Downwash for High Powered Propeller Driven Airplane
NACA 4-(5)(05)-041 Four Blade PropellerTunnel Mach = .2, 30 Degree Nominal Blade Angle at .75 Radius
STAR-CCM+ Blade Angle = 32 Degrees(Loaded blade angle change of +2 degrees estimated from Summary of Propeller Design Procedures and Data, Volume II)
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5
Advance Ratio (J)
Pow
er C
oeffi
cien
t (C
p)
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
Thru
st C
oeffi
cien
t (C
t)
Cp Corrected Wind Tunnel DataCp Uncorrected STAR-CCM+ RBMCt Corrected Wind Tunnel DataCt Uncorrected STAR-CCM+ RBM
Unsteady Ridgid Body Motion Model (RBM)1.5x10^6 Cell Trimmed Hexahedral ModelCoupled SolverK-Epsilon Turbulence Model
Copyright © 2010, Aeronautical Testing Service, Inc.
Case Study #2 - Estimation of Downwash for High Powered Propeller Driven Airplane
• Second Problem: Can CFD Accurately Predict Propeller and Wing
Affects At the Horizontal Tail (Downwash)?
Copyright © 2010, Aeronautical Testing Service, Inc.
Case Study #2 - Estimation of Downwash for High Powered Propeller Driven Airplane
• Predicted Downwash Angle Vs Wind Tunnel Results For Similar Configurations
STAR-CCM+ Predicted Downwash Angle Vs SpanAlpha = 0, RPM=1700, Mach=.15
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
-8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Span at Horizontal Tail LE Location
Dow
nwas
h (D
egre
es)
Wind Tunnel Measured Downwash Angle Vs SpanAlpha = 0
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
-8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Span at Horizontal Tail LE Location
Dow
nwas
h (D
egre
es)
• Influence of Propeller is Well Predicted and Highly Useful for Preliminary Design• Good Example of How CFD Can Be Used Early in the Design Cycle to Predict
Parameters That Can Have a Significant Impact On the Design
NOTE: Configurations Are Not The Same
Copyright © 2010, Aeronautical Testing Service, Inc.
How Can CFD and Wind Tunnel Testing Benefit Each Other
• CFD Can Be Used To Help Us Better Understand How To Improve Wind Tunnel Testing
The effect of a business jet model on the UWAL diffuser was investigated
Methods of improving the diffuser flow are currently being studied
Copyright © 2010, Aeronautical Testing Service, Inc.
How Can CFD and Wind Tunnel Testing Benefit Each Other
• Wind Tunnel Testing Can Continue to Help Us Understand How to Improve Flow Solvers – Some Challenges For CFD
• Accurate and robust high-lift prediction• S&C characteristics in highly separated conditions• Turbulence modeling in separated conditions• Understanding fluid-structure interactions for complex unsteady flow cases
– Ways Wind Tunnel Testing Can Help• Using low cost models where appropriate to allow for more validation testing• When necessary use highly instrumented models to gather data that is useful for
CFD development• Use of advanced dynamically scaled models for investigation of fluid-structure
interactions
Copyright © 2010, Aeronautical Testing Service, Inc.
Closing Thoughts
• CFD and wind tunnel testing each have inherent strengths and weaknesses
• By understanding these strengths and weaknesses we can:
– Exploit the strengths to allow for more efficient design cycles
– Reduce the overall cost of using these tools– Use these tools for their mutual benefit