Change: The Dynamic Force
Laying a Foundation by Implementing Best Practices in a School-wide Program
Rosemont Middle School, Fort Worth ISD
© 2009 University of Texas System/Texas Education Agency
Using PK-5 Methods in a Middle School Setting – an Elementary Approach • Methods from elementary bilingual classrooms
• Tiers for intervention • Core instruction and intervention • Inclusion • Progress monitoring and collection of data
• Methods from elementary administration • Focus on analysis & interpretation of data • Teaching teachers how to use data to impact the classroom • Analyzing, planning, designing, implementing and evaluating
programs & systems • Making change happen
© 2009 University of Texas System/Texas Education Agency 2
Moving Through the Steps of Transformative Change • Overview of 3 year program
• Distribution of administrative leadership • Effective master schedule • Quality school-based planning • Program monitoring matrix for administrators • Data management – access and use of data • Transfer of ownership and management of
program to teachers
© 2009 University of Texas System/Texas Education Agency 3
Moving Through the Steps of Transformative Change (cont.) • Overview of 3 year Program
• School-wide teams (college themes) • Eliminated pull-out tutoring • Strong discipline plan • School-wide test strategy (Book & Brain) • School-wide AVID classes (strategies) • School-wide TAKS/TEKS (SE correlated)
warm-ups • Effort based matrix for all testing
© 2009 University of Texas System/Texas Education Agency 4
Moving Through the Steps of Transformative Change (cont.) • Overview of 3 year program
• Standardized learning environments through learning walks • Professional development in content and programs • Teacher leadership development • Team building • Embedded professional development at faculty meetings • Increased parental involvement • Parent portfolio conferences • Student leadership development
© 2009 University of Texas System/Texas Education Agency 5
Moving Through the Steps of Transformative Change (cont.) • Overview of 3 year program
• PACT and RTI at Rosemont • Administrator/interventionist • Tier monitoring/management • Student portfolio conferences • Teacher as primary interventionist (Stage 1) • Differentiated instruction and inclusion tutors • Inclusion for Special Education • Progress monitoring
© 2009 University of Texas System/Texas Education Agency 6
Data Summary Rosemont Middle School
TAKS 3 year comparison Report
2005-2006 Comparison Year
MID-YEAR REPORTS TAKS Performance
08-09 07-08 06-07 05-06 08-09 07-08 06-07 05-06
6th Grade (16 students)
Reading 13%
Math 6%
7th Grade
Writing Objective 58% 54% 80% 48% 90% 86% 85% 77%
Writing Comp 79% 93%
Reading 79% 70% 72% 54%
Math 46% 51% 49% 25%
8th Grade
Science 34% 41% 49% 29% 47% 47% 43% 41%
Social Studies 55% 69% 57% 53% 80% 84% 74% 75%
Reading 74% 75% 67% 54% 6-8 rdg 86% 87% 79% 70%
Math 53% 56% 44% 20% 6-8 mth 71% 71% 66%
59%
© 2009 University of Texas System/Texas Education Agency 7
Next Steps – The Establishment Stage – Building Capacity • Extending the existing program towards higher performance capacity
• Master schedule change – the “get it all” schedule • Exploratory problem solving course development • Teacher as primary interventionist (Stage 2) • AVID as an elective for every team • Balance every team with learners in all tiers • Data Analyst and Data Management Team • Implementation teacher performance monitoring piece • AP Algebra and English I in all 8th grade teams • Student ownership & leadership (Stage 2) • Parental involvement “stimulus” plan
© 2009 University of Texas System/Texas Education Agency 8
.
.
and 5t
h .
9 © 2009 University of Texas System/Texas Education Agency
2
4
5
6
Sample Documents – Administrator Schedule Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday
L W O S L W O S L W O S L W O S L W O S
8:159: Faculty MeeOng AVID 8:15‐9:00 English 8:15‐9:00 00 8:00‐9:00
1 UT UT
BA YL OR
BA YL OR
3 TCU TCU
Lunch 11:50‐12
:20
A&M A&M
Class walkthrou
ghs and hall mon
itoring
during passing periods. Lun
ch duty 4t
h
and 5t
h
LCT LCT UT office 7 7 7 SS SS SS
Class
walkthrou
ghs and
PAClass
CT
walkthrou
ghs and
mon
itorin
Class walkthrou
ghs and hall
mon
itoring during passing
period
s. Lun
ch duty 4t
h
hall
ADMIN. office office 7 7 SCI SCI
during passing
OR
BA YLoffi ce
PAoffi
CT
ce
MEETING Lunch TCU
11‐11:30 ASST. PRIN.
PA
CT
PA
CT
Lunch Lunch Lunch Lunch 7/8 7/8 Lunch 7/8 duty 11:50 duty READ READ duty READ
Class walkthrou
ghs
and hall mon
itoring
Class walkthrou
ghs and hall mon
itoring during 11:50‐
. 12:20
passing pe
riod
s. Lun
ch duty 4t
h and 5t
h
A&M Lunch Lunch 8 8 Lunch Lunch duty duty SCI SCI duty duty
Class walkthrou
ghs and hall mon
itoring
during passing periods. Lun
ch duty 4t
h
TTECH TTECH Lunch 2‐2:30
7 TA’S CLERKS
8 UNT UNT SMU SMU
office
Lunch Lunch 2:30‐3 2‐2:3 :00 0
TTECH Lunch 8 8 8 2‐2:30 SS SS SS
aQend ance
L 7/8 7/8 MATH MATH
SMU SPED SPED
Lunch
3‐3:30
CAMP
US
UNT Class
walkthrou
ghs
and hall
mon
itoring
during passing2:45‐3:1
5 UNT UNT SMU SMU
4:30 Football Faculty MeeOng Volleyball 5:30 5:30‐9:00 4:30‐5:30 5:30‐9:00
10 © 2009 University of Texas System/Texas Education Agency
Principal Monitoring MatrixPRINCIPAL’S Overview InstrucOonal Monitoring: Collegial Planning, Dept/Team Planning, Pyramid of IntervenOons, Subgroup AcOon Plans, Personnel Issues, New Teachers, TAKS Conferences, Parent Conferences Classroom Evidence: DocumentaOon ReflecOve: Summary of Concerns Other: FaciliOes, Budgets, Grants, Student Services, CIP, CommiQees, Professional Development, Programs, CCC, SBDM, SIP, Title I, Counselors, Dept Chairs, Team Leaders, LCTs, Teacher Asst. Asst. Principals, TAP, Faculty, Team Builders, SPA Facilitators Other Monitored:
Assistant Counselors LCTs TAP Team Dept. Teacher Asst. SPA Facilitators Team Builders MeeOngs Programs IniOaOves Principals X X X Leaders X Ch. X X
Other Monitored: Asst Supervision EvaluaOon Learning Lesson Plan Grades Assessment Student DocumentaOon of PACT Discipline AQendance Principal PDAS and Walks and IntervenOons I, MeeOngs Monitoring and Concerns
Content Performance Curriculum II, III Parents Issues
4 High Orsak Orsak Orsak Orsak WinseQ WinseQ II/III WinseQ Both WinseQ Orsak WinseQ Performance Teams LCTs Stephens Stephens Stephens Stephens WinseQ WinseQ II/III WinseQ Both WinseQ Stephens WinseQ 7/8 Split Stephens Stephens Stephens Stephens WinseQ WinseQ II/III WinseQ Both WinseQ Stephens WinseQ Language Stephens Stephens Stephens Stephens WinseQ WinseQ II/III WinseQ Both WinseQ Stephens WinseQ Center Reading Stephens Stephens Stephens Stephens WinseQ WinseQ II/III WinseQ Both WinseQ English Stephens Stephens Stephens Stephens WinseQ WinseQ II/III WinseQ Both WinseQ Social Orsak Orsak Orsak Orsak WinseQ WinseQ II/III WinseQ Both WinseQ Studies Math WinseQ WinseQ WinseQ WinseQ WinseQ WinseQ II/III WinseQ WinseQ WinseQ Science WinseQ WinseQ WinseQ WinseQ WinseQ WinseQ II/III WinseQ WinseQ WinseQ SPED WinseQ WinseQ WinseQ WinseQ WinseQ WinseQ II/III WinseQ WinseQ WinseQ LEP Orsak Orsak Orsak Orsak WinseQ WinseQ Ii/III WinseQ Both WinseQ AQendance WinseQ II/III WinseQ WinseQ ElecOves Stephens Stephens Stephens Stephens WinseQ WinseQ Both Stephens Stephens WinseQ
11
Distributed Leadership
© 2009 University of Texas System/Texas Education Agency
Sandi WinseQ ChrisOne Orsak Terrance Stephens Lead Content Teachers Counselors IntervenOon Specialist
Team Leaders Department Heads
Office Assistants Crucial Personnel
All Students Tiers II & III
All Students Tier I
All Students Tier I
IdenOfy Dept Content Problems
Test Coordinators Under WinseQ
AcOon Planning for TEAM/Dept
Maintain Student Profiles
All Teams UT, Baylor, TCU Texas Tech
A&M, SMU, UNT Balance Literacy in Contents
Student Records Work with LCTs AQendance for Tutoring
Math, Science, SPED Depts.
Social Studies Reading, ELA, All ElecOves
Observe and Model Lessons
LPAC & Lau Lesson Planning Record Lesson Plan Record
Campus Test Coordinator Lunch Duty Lunch Duty Coach Teachers Adopt‐A‐School Coordinators
Cross Curriculum Planning
Record Grade Book Record
21st Century Grant AQendance
Investment Capital Fund Locker assignments Lesson Plans and Curriculum
Volunteer Coordinators Set Model Classrooms Calendar
SSI ALL ESL LPAC CommiQee
School Safety & Security InstrucOon and Pacing PACT Records IFL & Balanced Literacy Test Prep
AthleOc Events AthleOc Events AthleOc Events Lead IFL AQendance New Teachers Test Reports
SES Program & AQendance
Adv. Academics & AVID CommunicaOons & Media
Design Content Seminars 504 Maintain Student PorNolios
Benchmark Scoring
Student Handbook Teacher Handbook
Technology CommiQee IdenOfy Student Tutoring Needs
Counseling TEAM and Department Mtg.
Mini‐Assessment Scoring
Teacher Assts. Office Clerks Technology Coordinator Design Assessment Campaigns Monitor Student Grades All Requested Reports
Custodians SubsOtutes Buses Lead review and interpret data
PACT Conferences Oversee Student Class AQendance
SASI input for Asst. Principal
AQendance Monitoring Mentor Manager Bus Liaison Mentor New Teachers RTI Conferences Enforce Homework INCLUSION Student Reports
PACT Monitoring Duty Schedule Campus Monitors Campus Staff Development
Monitoring SSI Student Reports
Progress Monitoring Textbooks Jr. NaOonal Honor Society School Improvement Professional Dev.
Data DisaggregaOon LEP Student Reports
Assessment Monitoring Scheduling Radios Daily AQendance Reports
Tutoring Monitoring Parental Involvement Discipline CommiQee
12 © 2009 University of Texas System/Texas Education Agency
Weekly Administrator Report DOMAIN ACTIVITIES DESCRIPTION YOUR ACTIONS TAKEN RESULTS Instructional Management (Content) EXCEEDS EXPECTATION (Begin these lines with: Analyzed, Designed, Developed, Implemented, - promotes instruction improvement REQUIRES: Evaluated, Planned, Coordinated, Facilitated, etc…) - knows & uses data to drive programs and Excels in promoting the improvement of improvement instruction and is able to consistently utilize data - leads instruction in content and other resources to conceptualize innovative - revisits effectiveness of programs programs and practices which lead to improved - visits and reports upon all content classrooms (BS/ instruction. DD/AS/Sat) - has the knowledge of core problems in the content SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT – PRIORITIES FOR IMPROVING STUDENT ACHEIVEMENT Instructional Monitoring to include Collegial Planning, Dept/Team Planning, Pyramid of Interventions, Subgroup Action Plans, Personnel Issues,
New Teachers, TAKS Conferences, Parent Conferences PRINCIPAL PROTOCOLS: Classroom Evidence supported by Documentation of Monitoring
Reflective Practices and Summary of Concerns AP Meeting Notes DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED: Team Agendas Department PACT Learning Walk Agend Parent TIER/TAK Walkthrough
Minutes Agenda Minutes Monitoring – Evidence a of Conference Log Conference Log Feedback Your students meetin Documentation
gs w/ Subord .
WINSETT REPORTS, AGENDAS, MONITORING: Progress Monitoring Tier II & III, Attendance Monitoring, PACT Monitoring, Grade Monitoring, Assessment Monitoring, Tutoring Monitoring ORSAK REPORTS, AGENDAS, MONITORING: Tier I Monitoring, LPAC Committee, AVID, Mentees/Mentors, Parental Involvement, Your Discipline, Performance Issues STEPHENS REPORTS, AGENDAS, MONITORING: Tier I Monitoring, School Safety, Technology, Jr. National Honor Society, Discipline Committee, Student Discipline School Improvement EXCEEDS EXPECTATION (Begin these lines with: Analyzed, Designed, Developed, Implemented, - 80% of instructional day (9:00-4:30) is invested in REQUIRES: Evaluated, Planned, Coordinated, Facilitated, etc…) school improvement efforts –TIME OUTSIDE YOUR Excels in promoting leadership in support of OFFICE school/organizational improvement efforts. - 20% of instructional day (9:00-4:30) is invested in paperwork – TIME INSIDE YOUR OFFICE Student Management EXCEEDS EXPECTATION (Do not list rudimentary solutions – list dynamic solutions such as - breaks cycles of negative student discipline by REQUIRES: mediation, PACT, School within a School, Credit Recovery, Contracts, providing appeals on behalf of the student Excels in promoting positive student conduct SST, TEAM Plans for Tardies, Discipline, Incomplete Work, Failures) - decreases the number of infractions from assigned through appropriate programs/practices. content teachers - improves student discipline by developing programs of intervention Academic Excellence Indicators EXCEEDS EXPECTATION You listed in your action plan: Campus Performance Indicators REQUIRES: 1. Individual Student Profiles – Closely monitor weekly - daily work demonstrates improvement in a Excels in making observable and commendable 2. Classroom Observation – Walkthroughs weekly substantial way progess toward defined criteria and objective. 3. Report Cards – Monitor number of I’s and F’s 6 weeks - leadership is tremendously effective in improving 4. Team Meetings – Address Agenda More than weekly lesson plans, grading, assessment, and tutoring within 5. Performance – Monitor student work each semester the assigned content 6. Parent Contact – Telephone Log (+’s & -‘s) weekly - progress towards CIP is evident and effectively 7. Demonstrated Student Improvement every three weeks communicated to the Principal and others
Presenters Rosemont Middle School, Fort Worth ISD
• Yassmin Lee, Principal • Christine Orsak, Assistant Principal • Terrance Stephens, Assistant Principal • Sandi Winsett, Assistant Principal
© 2009 University of Texas System/Texas Education Agency 13