NUCLEAR PHYSICS A
Nuclear Physics A 575 ( 1994) 449-459
Classical photon production in neutron-proton collisions
Giuseppe Russo a,b a Dipartimento di Fisica dell’ Universitd di Catania, Corso Italia. 57-95129 Catania, Italy
b Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare. Laboratorio Nazionale de1 Sud, Catania, Italy
Received 15 June 1993; revised 23 February 1994
Abstract
The classical theory of bremsstrahlung is applied to neutron-proton scattering in order to obtain the elementary photon-production cross section. The so-called “internal radiation” from the Feynman diagrams is classically evaluated in the charged one-pion exchange hypothesis. The introduction of such a contribution produces a substantial enhancement of the pny yield for photon energies higher than 30 MeV. The results are compared with quantum calculations, which use a parametrization of the nucleon-nucleon T-matrix in terms of OBE amplitudes and with few available experimental bremsstrahlung data.
Keywords: Bremsstrahlung, pionic-exchange currents.
1. Introduction
The elementary photon-production cross section in nucleon-nucleon (NN) collisions
is a necessary input for photon-production calculations in heavy-ion reactions within
the theoretical frameworks based on the Boltzmann-Nordheim-Vlasov (BNV) [ 1] and
Quantum Molecular Dynamics (QMD) [ 21 approaches. At present, this essential ingre-
dient cannot be extracted from the experimental data over sufficiently wide enough kine-
matical range. There are various evidences that hard photons in the nucleus-nucleus col-
lision are mainly produced as a result of incoherent superposition of individual neutron-
proton bremsstrahlung contributions. Several attempts to reproduce such y-spectra in a
wide range of beam energies by means of the classical soft-photon expression [3] for
the elementary npy process, while seem to give a reasonable estimation of the overall
y-yields, they provide an underestimation of the associated inverse slope parameters [ 11.
On the other hand, various quantum-mechanical calculations [4-61 of the elementary
0375-9474/94/$07.00 @ 1994 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved SSDI0375-9474(94)00150-L
450 G. Russo/Nuclear Physics A 575 (1994) 449-459
process including convection, magnetic and meson-exchange current contributions were
carried out. Some of these [5] have been applied successfully to explain experimental
y-data from nucleus-nucleus collisions especially close to the NN kinematic threshold.
It was emphasized that this better agreement is essentially due to the contribution of
radiation from virtual-pion exchange which is not included in the classical approxima-
tion [3]. It allows neutrons and protons to exchange their identity during the collision
leading to an increase of the pn scattering angular distribution at backward angles and
to an enhancement of the high-energy y-ray production. However, at variance with the
classical case, parametrizations of the elementary double-differential quantum y cross
sections are generally not available in the literature, while, for practical applications in
nucleus-nucleus dynamical calculations, an analytical representation of the elementary
npy process is required. For this reason and also in order to achieve a simple y cross
section, we apply the principles of the semiclassical theory of bremsstrahlung [ 31 to
the proton-neutron scattering assuming it proceeds via a virtual-pion exchange.
2. Internal radiation from charged one-pion exchange
We assume that the internucleon separation is large enough to describe their interaction
by the one-pion exchange contribution. The creation or annihilation of charged pions is
a process in which radiation is emitted. Such processes are purely quantum mechanical
in origin. There can be no attempt at a classical explanation of the basic phenomena.
Given that the process occurs, we may legitimately ask about the classical spectrum
and intensity of electromagnetic radiation accompanying it. Our starting point is the
semiclassical double-differential photon cross section
d2c, #, d21
dE, dL+ = tiEy dw, d0,
where d21/ dw, dL$ represents the energy radiated per unit solid angle per unit fre-
quency interval, a is the fine structure constant and the vector A(o), defined by [ 31
+CQ
A(w) = I nx [(n-P> XPI (1 -P.n)2
exp[iw(t--.r(t)/c)] dt,
--m
(2)
originates from the Fourier transform of the product RE, at the retarded time, between
the so-called acceleration electric field E in the observation point and the distance R
from this point to the point charge position.
For a specified motion, r(t) is known, /3(t) and j?(t) can be computed and the
integral can be evaluated as a function of w and the direction of sight it (unity vector),
which is generally assumed constant in time, since the observation point is imagined to
be far away from the region of space where the acceleration occurs. The sudden creation
of a rapidly moving charged pion will be accompanied by the emission of radiation.
Either we can think of the pion initially at rest in the nucleon frame and being accelerated
G. Russo/Nuclear Physics A 575 (1994) 449-459 451
violently during a short time interval to its final velocity, or we can imagine that its
charge is suddenly turned on in the same short time interval. Because of its larger mass,
the involved nucleon receives a smaller acceleration so producing a negligible radiation
contribution. A similar consideration holds during the pion disappearance phase.
Then, we assume that the virtual charged pion suffers constant accelerations during
short and equal time intervals At = 7 corresponding to its emission and capture. The
acceleration phases are supposed to begin at the times --7 and T, respectively, the latter
being the time of flight of the emitted pion. During the time interval [0, T] the pion is
supposed moving with a constant velocity c&. Thus, by indicating with pi and & the
velocity (in c units) of the initial and final involved nucleons, the integration over the
time in Eq. (2) implies a coherent superposition of contributions to the electromagnetic
radiation due to the sudden emission and absorption of the virtual charged pion, namely
A(U) =Ai(m> + Af(w). (3)
We shall restrict ourselves to the non-relativistic limit. Then, we can simplify the first
amplitude as
0
Ai( J exp(iwt)[nx {(n-p) xP}](1+2j?.n) dt --7 = [n X (n X APi) - n X (Pi X &I 1 x
{
being in the [ --7,O] time interval,
p=pi +p(t+r)
with
(4a)
and
Analogously, for the [T, T + 71 time interval, we obtain
T+T
Mm) = J exp(iwt)[nx {(n-p) xp}](l+2j?+n)dt
T = nx(nxAPf)-nx(p,xPf>lexp[iw(T+7)l
(4b)
being in this case,
452 G. Russo/Nuclear Physics A 575 (1994) 449-459
P=P,+PO-T)
with
and
By neglecting second- and higher-order terms, the total amplitude Eq. (3) is written as
sin UT/~ A(w) N exp( --iw7/2) -
W/2
X[n X (n X A&) +eXp[iw(T+r)]{n X (U X A&)}] (5)
Thus, one finally obtains
IAWl*= [y]*,/n x (n x Afli)12 + In x (n x Aflf)l*
+2[n x (n x A&>l[n x (n x A/?f)]cos[w(T+r)]]. (6)
By assuming momentum conservation during the pion emission and capture phases, in
the neutron-proton center of mass, we have
A& = (m-m,)Pi +mPf
m,
and
Eq. (6) can be made explicit by using, for any vectors Q and b, the general identity
[nx (nxa)].[nx (nxb)]=a.b-(n.a)(n.b)
= ab[ COS oab - COS ana COS e,&]
= ab sin e,, sin &b cos ( Qna - @&) ,
where O,,, Qna and &b, @nb are the polar and azimuthal angles formed from the vectors
a and b with the direction II of observation, respectively. Then, after averaging over the
direction (Qr,, Qnpt) of the final nucleon, we finally get
]A(u)]*II [~]*[&sin*&r8, + $&I
x{l+2~(~-1)(1-Cos,W(T+7)])}. (7)
Actually, we have to remark that to obtain Eq. (7) from Eq. (6) we supposed, in
the averaging procedure, both an isotropic NN scattering and a constant pion time of
G. Russo/Nuclear Physics A 575 (1994) 449-459 453
flight T. Moreover, in the classical approach here studied, the energy and the momentum
of the emitted photon cannot be considered. A posteriori such a neglect was justified
because we used the soft-photon limit. Although, when the photon is included in the
balance, the radiative cross section obtained does not automatically conserve energy and
momentum, we can impose their validity by treating the kinematics correctly. Finally,
to account for the virtual-pion wave function, we should make an average of Eq. (7)
over its probability density. Thus, using the asymptotic form of the one-pion exchange
wave function [ 71, we have to evaluate
(lA(w)12) = f rIACw)[2exp [-2r/pl dr,
0
where p = fic/m,c2 N 1.4 1 fm is the range of the NN potential. It is possible to obtain a
reasonable estimate of the final result by the assumption that the virtual pion propagates
with the speed of light (Wick’s argument). Thus, setting T = Y/C and by inserting
Eq. (7) into Eq. (8)) we get
x4[ 1 -coswr] + (Ey/m,c2)2 + (E,/m,c2> sin@7
4 + (Er/m,,c212 I- (9)
The spectrum of radiation at finite frequencies will depend on the details of the
collision, but its form at low frequencies depends only on the initial and final velocities.
In the very low-frequency limit, that is, for emitted photons whose energies are small
compared to the total energy available, being wr << 1, Eq. (9) goes to
((A(w) 12) 2 [j3’sin28npi + $;I
(10)
where the first factor in the right-hand side (r.h.s.) is just what one obtains in a classical
calculation [ 31 of the so-called external radiation, namely radiation from the proton only
in which the charged-pion exchange mechanism is not accounted for.
3. Bremsstrahlung cross section from np scattering
In order to calculate the differential cross section for neutron-proton bremsstrah-
lung, we should incoherently sum over the three-pion state of charge contributions with
appropriate weights.
454 G. Russo/Nuclear Physics A 575 (1994) 449-459
In case of ?ro exchange, there is no classical radiation emitted from the pion but only
one contribution from the proton bremsstrahlung in the initial or final phase depending
on whether the neutral pion is emitted from proton or neutron. The associated radiation
can be evaluated starting from Eq. (2) and using a similar procedure it provides the
well-known classical expression [ 31, namely
IA( N [@sin28,pi + $@I. (11)
After that, for our purpose, we use the isospin decomposition of reaction cross section
for single real-pion production as parametrized in Ref. [ 81. Then, we will assume that
Cry = Waa,(?P) + w+(T#r+) + W_C~(Z=) ,
where
and
u”P mel =&&+alo+2U,, +3ao11.
Again from Ref. [ 81, in the Tlab < 500 MeV range, we deduce approximatively w. N $
and W+ = w_ N i. Thus, we finally obtain from Eqs, (10) and (11)
d2a,
dE, dL$ =
d2u,
[ 1 dEY’ d% Jackson
(12)
We would like to remark that the second factor in the r.h.s. of Eq. (12) has some
similarity with that suggested in Ref. [ 91 where a rough estimation of the bremsstrahlung
contribution from virtual pions is made.
In Fig. 1 we display the comparison between double-differential cross sections for
proton-neutron bremsstrahlung at &b = 200 MeV in the soft-photon approximation, with
and without internal contribution (solid and dashed lines, respectively), and the quantum
calculation [ 41 (dash-dotted line) with the parametrization of the NN T-matrix in terms
of OBE amplitudes. We find that the charged meson exchange is essential because it
raises the production yield for photon energies higher than 30 MeV. The result of our
non-relativistic approach generally underestimates the y-yield at forward and backward
angles with respect to the covariant quantal calculation carried out without contribution
from the magnetic moment.
For the first time, Malek et al. [ lo] measured the photon spectrum produced at 90” in
the npy process at 170 MeV neutron laboratory energy with an experimental uncertainty
in the neutron flux of about 30%. The spectrum observed after background correction
is shown in Fig. 2 together with our semiclassical calculation. Since experimentally the
G. Russo/Nuclear Physics A 575 (1994) 449-459 455
30. (x4) -
-1 -_
- - _, - _
Fig. 1. Comparison between double-differential cross sections for proton-neutron bremsstrahlung at
&, = 200 MeV for various photon angles. Dash-dotted line: quantum calculations of Ref. [4] ; Our classical
calculation and that without internal radiation [ 31, both in the soft-photon approximation, are given by the
solid and the dashed lines, respectively.
‘io 40 60 60 100
R, [MeVI
Fig. 2. Comparison of the photon spectrum measured at 90°, in the np collision at 170 MeV of neutron energy [ 10) with our theoretical calculation.
456 G. Russo/Nuclear Physics A 575 (1994) 449-459
103
102
101
100 25 50 75 100 125 150
E, [MeVl Fig. 3. Photon spectra observed at three laboratory angles in the pdy reaction at 200 MeV of proton en-
ergy [ 111. Also shown in the figure are the results (solid lines) of our theoretical calculation for the pny
reaction at 200 MeV, in absence of reliable calculations for the pdy process.
energy profile of the neutron beam had a FWHM of 70 MeV, we folded our calculated
cross section with a gaussian in energy having the same width. We found our results in
fair agreement with the first direct measurements of y-spectrum in np collisions.
It is experimentally confirmed, by comparison between the ppy and pdy reactions [ 111,
that the ppy radiation is negligible with respect to the npy one. Thus, it is also possible
to extract information on the elementary npy process from radiation emitted in pdy
reactions. Pinston et al. [ 121 measured at several angles the pdy reaction at 200 MeV
of protons. In Fig. 3 such data are compared with our semiclassical calculation for the
elementary pny process. Our result generally underestimates the data as it also hap-
pens for full quanta1 calculations [ 121, probably depending on the Fermi motion of the
neutron inside the deuteron which is not taken into account.
Edgington and Rose [ 111 studied the pdy reaction at 140 MeV. The measured angle-
integrated y cross section, reported in Fig. 4, where it is compared with our pny
calculation (full line). Although they agree in the absolute values, a different trend is
observed.
By integrating, in the lab system, the double-differential photon cross section Eq. ( 12))
both over the whole angular range and energies above E, = 40 MeV we obtained the
full curve reported in Fig. 5 which is also compared with the Jackson’s prediction and
the few available experimental data [ 10,11,13].
G. Russff/~~cle~r Physics A 57.5 (1994) 449-459
! I 0.01 g
20 40 60 80 100
R, [MeVl
457
Fig. 4. Comparison between total-energy y-spectrum for pd bremsstrahlung at 140 MeV incident proton energy [ 121 with the results of our calculation for the pny reaction.
II r I j I I I, ,-I 100 200 300 400
Ttab [MeVl
Fig. 5. The total bremsstrahlung cross section (for E, 2 40 MeV) versus the bombarding energy of the proton-neutron system. The full and dashed lines are the classical soft-photon limit with and without infernal radiurio~, respectively. They are compared with the available data from Refs. [IO] (diamond), [ 1 l] (square) and 1131 (cross).
458 G. Russo/Nuclear Physics A 575 (1994) 449-459
4. Summary and conclusions
We have applied the classical theory of bremsstrahlung to the neutron-proton scatter-
ing. The so-called internal radiation from the Feynman diagrams, in the single virtual-
pion exchange hypothesis, is evaluated as a coherent superposition of electromagnetic
fields produced during the pion emission and its capture. We find that the charged-meson
exchange mechanism is essential because, allowing neutrons and protons to exchange
their identity during the collision, it produces an enhancement for high-energy y-ray
emission with respect to the predictions of Jackson’s expression.
The comparison of our non-relativistic and semiclassical calculation, in the soft-
photon limit, with quanta1 results seems to evidence a slight difference in the angular
distribution of emitted photons which has in our case a more marked dipolar component.
We observe that, although the pion emission process is purely quantum mechanical, the
classical approach has the advantage that working directly with electromagnetic fields
does not present the usual ambiguities noticed in quantum-mechanical approaches when
one uses different gauges in the one-pion exchange diagram [ 141.
The comparison with the npy and pdy available experimental data has shown that our
calculation in general gives the right order of magnitude for hard-photon yields.
All that suggests the use of such an elementary double-differential photon cross
section as a convenient input for hard-photon-production calculations in nucleus-nucleus
collisions within the frameworks of BNV and QMD simulations. Recently, perturbative
BNV calculations of hard-y production in nucleus-nucleus collisions, using Eq. (12) as
elementary cross section, have been able to reproduce [ 151, as functions of the impact
parameter, both the multiplicity and slope of the y-yield obtained in measurements
performed with an almost 47r multidetector array.
Finally, we would like to emphasize that, following the procedure described in Sect. 2,
a fully relativistic expression also removing the soft-photon approximation could be
derived in a straightforward way.
References
] I] W. Bauer, G.F. Bertsch, W. Cassing and U. Mosel, Phys. Rev. C 34 (1986) 2127; T.S. Bir6, K. Niita, A.L. De Paoli, W. Bauer, W. Cassing and U. Mosel, Nucl. Phys. A 475 (1987) 579; K. Niita, A.L. De Paoli, W. Bauer, T.S. Bir6, W. Cassing and U. Mosel, Nucl. Phys. A 482 (1988)
525~;
C.M. Ko and J. Aichelin, Phys. Rev. C 35 (1987) 1976.
[2] G.Q. Li, Y. Lotfy, SW. Hang, T. Maruyama, D.T. Khoa and A. Faessler, J. Phys. G 18 (1992) 681.
[ 31 J.D. Jackson, Classical electrodynamics (Wiley, New York, 1962).
(41 M. Schafer, T.S. Bird W. Gassing, U. Mosel, H. Nifenecker and J.A. Pinston, Z. Phys. A 339 (1991)
391.
[5] K. Nakayama, Phys. Rev C 39 (1989) 1475;
D. Neuhauser and S.E. Koonin, Nucl. Phys. A 462 (1987) 163; K. Niita, T.S. Biro, W. Cassing, A.L. De Paoli, U. Mosel and M. Schafer, Nucl. Phys. A 495 (1989)
91c; K. Nakayama and G.F. Bertsch, Phys. Rev. C 40 (1989) 685.
G. Russo/Nuclear Physics A 575 (1994) 449-459 459
[6] V.R. Brown and J. Franklin, Phys. Rev. C 8 (1973) 1706;
L.S. Celenza, B.F. Gibson, M.K. Liou and M.I. Sobel, Phys. Lett. B 41 (1972) 283;
G.E. Bohannon, Phys. Rev. C 17 (1978) 865; G.E. Bohannon, L. Heller and R.H. Thompson, Phys. Rev. C 16 (1977) 284;
C. DuPont, C. Dean, l? Leleux, F? Lipnik, P Macq, A. Ninane, J. Pestieau, W.K. Sindano and P Wauters, Nucl. Phys. A 481 (1988) 424.
171 D.M. Brink, Nuclear forces (Pergamon, Oxford, 1965).
[8] B.J. VerWest and R.A. Amdt, Phys. Rev. C 25 (1982) 1979.
]9] H. Nifenecker and J.A. Pinston, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 23 (1989) 271.
[lo] E Malek, H. Nifenecker, J.A. Pinston, F. Schussler, S. Drissi and J. Julien, Phys. Lett. B 266 (1991)
255. [ 111 J.A. Edgington and B. Rose, Nucl. Phys. 89 (1966) 523.
[ 121 J.A. Pinston, D. Barneoud, V. Bellini, S. Drissi, J. Guillot, J. Julien, H. Nifenecker and E Schussler,
Phys. Lett. B 249 ( 1989) 402;
H. Nifenecker and J.A. Pinston, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Sci. 40 (1990) 113; Nucl. Phys. A 538 (1992) 93~.
[ 131 PEM. Koehler, K.W. Rothe and E.H. Thorndike, Phys. Rev. Lett. 18 (1967) 933.
[ 141 L. Heller, Proc. Gull-Lake Symp. on the two-body force in nuclei, Gull-Lake, Michigan, 1971, eds. SM.
Austin and G.M. Crawley (Plenum, New York, 9171) p. 79.
[ 151 G. Russo, Phys. Rev. C 48 (1993) 2926.