1
May 10, 2012 Annual General Meeting
2
May 10, 2012 Annual General Meeting Neil McMillan President and CEO
3
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Information This document contains certain forward-looking statements relating but not limited to the Company’s expectations, intentions, plans and
beliefs. Forward-looking information can often be identified by forward-looking words such as “anticipate”, “believe”, “expect”, “goal”, “plan”, “intent”, “estimate”, “may” and “will” or similar words suggesting future outcomes or other expectations, beliefs, plans, objectives, assumptions, intentions or statements about future events or performance. Forward-looking information may include reserve and resource estimates, estimates of future production, unit costs, costs of capital projects and timing of commencement of operations, and is based on current expectations that involve a number of business risks and uncertainties. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from any forward-looking statement include, but are not limited to, failure to establish estimated resources and reserves, the grade and recovery of mined ore varying from estimates, capital and operating costs varying significantly from estimates, delays in obtaining or failures to obtain required governmental, environmental or other project approvals, inflation, changes in exchange rates, fluctuations in commodity prices, delays in the development of projects and other factors. Forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from expected results.
Potential shareholders and prospective investors should be aware that these statements are subject to known and unknown risks,
uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those suggested by the forward-looking statements. Shareholders are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking information. By its nature, forward-looking information involves numerous assumptions, inherent risks and uncertainties, both general and specific, that contribute to the possibility that the predictions, forecasts, projections and various future events will not occur. Claude Resources undertakes no obligation to update publicly or otherwise revise any forward-looking information whether as a result of new information, future events or other such factors which affect this information, except as required by law.
Cautionary note to U.S. investors concerning resource estimate The resource estimates in this document were prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101, adopted by the Canadian
Securities Administrators. The requirements of National Instrument 43-101 differ significantly from the requirements of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). In this document, we use the terms “measured”, “indicated” and “inferred” resources. Although these terms are recognized and required in Canada, the SEC does not recognize them. The SEC permits U.S. mining companies, in their filings with the SEC, to disclose only those mineral deposits that constitute “reserves”. Under United States standards, mineralization may not be classified as a reserve unless the determination has been made that the mineralization could be economically and legally extracted at the time the determination is made. United States investors should not assume that all or any portion of a measured or indicated resource will ever be converted into “reserves”. Further, “inferred resources” have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence and whether they can be mined economically or legally, and United States investors should not assume that “inferred resources” exist or can be legally or economically mined, or that they will ever be upgraded to a higher category.
Cautionary Statement
4
Board of Directors
Ted J. Nieman Chair,
Nominating & Corporate
Governance Chair
Ron J. Hicks Audit Chair
J. Robert Kowalishin
Safety, Health & Environmental
Committee Chair
Mike Sylvestre Reserves
Committee Chair
Brian Booth Director
Ray A. McKay Director
Rita M. Mirwald Human
Resources & Compensation
Committee Chair
Neil McMillan President, CEO and
Director
5
Executive Officers
Neil McMillan President, CEO and Director
Rick Johnson CFO, Vice
President of Finance
Brian Skanderbeg
Vice President of Exploration
Peter Longo Vice President of
Operations
6
Claude Resources Inc. has three Canadian Gold Projects: Seabee, Amisk and Madsen.
Each project is expected to host multi-
million ounce ore bodies and has the potential to produce over 100 thousand ounces per year.
What is Claude All About?
7
• The Company’s mission is to create and deliver outstanding stakeholder value through the exploration, development, and mining of gold and other precious metals
• Its vision is to be highly valued by all stakeholders for
its ability to discover, develop and produce gold and other precious metals in a safe, environmentally responsible and profitable manner.
Mission & Vision
8
Share Price Performance – CRJ vs. Peers (52 Weeks)
-70%
-60%
-50%
-40%
-30%
-20%
-10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
Shar
e Pr
ice P
erfo
rman
ce (5
2 W
eeks
)
52 Week (April 30, 2011 – April 30, 2012)
52 Week Peer Group
52 Week CRJ
9
Share Price Performance – CRJ vs. Peers (3 year)
-50%
0%
50%
100%
150%
200%
250%
300%
Peer Group 3 year
Claude 3 Year
10
Corporate Overview
Stock Exchanges: TSX CRJ NYSE Amex CGR Shares Outstanding (May 4, 2012): Basic 173.7 million Fully Diluted 183.2 million Market Cap $145 million CDN Analyst Coverage: Brian Christie Desjardins Securities Cosmos Chui CIBC Paolo Lostritto National Bank Paul Burchell Dundee Securities Sam Crittenden RBC Wendell Zerb Canaccord Genuity
Cash Costs per Ounce: 2011 $908 CDN $918 US TSX: 52 Week High $2.36 52 Week Low $0.80 Avg. Volume 236,000 NYSE Amex: 52 Week High $2.37 52 Week Low $0.82 Avg. Volume 418,000 As of May 4, 2012
11
Focused on Growth
Great Risk vs. Reward Investment Opportunity Cash flow and net earnings from Seabee Operation
Significant exploration upside at all three projects
Experienced management team
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
80,000
90,000
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Prod
uctio
n O
unce
s
Increasing Seabee Gold Production (2007-2016)
806,000 735,000 662,000 1,300,000
1,225,000 1,225,000
1,225,000
1,018,000
1,566,000
0
500000
1000000
1500000
2000000
2500000
3000000
3500000
4000000
4500000
2008 2009 2010 2011
Resource Base
Amisk
Madsen
Seabee
0.81 Moz
1.96 Moz
2.91 Moz
4.09 Moz
12
2011 Highlights
• Santoy 8 Gold Mine reached commercial production
• Seabee Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources increased from 662,000 ounces to 1,300,000 ounces due to the new discoveries of Santoy Gap and L62 deposits
• NI 43-101 resource calculation at Amisk Gold Project of 1,566,000 gold equivalent ounces
• Positive metallurgical test results from Amisk Gold Project
• Claude Resources announced agreement to acquire St. Eugene Mining and own 100% of the Amisk Gold Project (completed in Q1 2012)
• De-watering completed to the 16th level at the Madsen project
• Rehabilitation and construction of drill chambers on the 16th level at Madsen
• Deep drilling of the 8 Zone from the 16th level
13
Financial Highlights
12 months ended Dec 31 2011
12 months ended Dec 31 2010
Revenues (millions) $69.7 $56.0
Gold sold (ounces) 44,632 44,003
Average realized gold price (CDN) $1,561 $1,273
Total cash cost per ounce (CDN) $908 $709
Cash flow (millions) (1) $22.2 $19.8
Cash flow per share (1) $0.14 $0.15
(1) For an explanation of non-IFRS performance measures, refer to the “Non-IFRS Performance Measures” section in the Company’s MD&A filed on www.sedar.com.
14
Financial Highlights
12 months ended Dec 31,
2011
12 months ended Dec 31,
2010
Net profit (millions) $9.5 $10.3
Net profit per share (basic and diluted) $0.06 $0.08
15
AMISK PROJECT
Operations
16
Seabee Gold Operation
• 100% ownership • 14,400 hectare property • Produced over 980,000 ounces of gold from 1991 to 2011 • 1.30 million ounces in NI 43-101 resource calculation • Full infrastructure including an 850 tonne per day permitted mill • Two producing mines: Seabee Gold Mine and the Santoy 8 Gold Mine • Exploration focused on Santoy Gap, L62, Santoy 8, Seabee Deep, and Neptune 130,000 metre exploration program planned for 2012
17
Seabee Property
Seabee Property: 14,400 Hectares
• Established fully-permitted infrastructure • Underexplored productive belt • $7.5 M, 130,000 m regional exploration in 2012
18
Regional Exploration: Santoy Gap
• Inferred Mineral Resources of 495,000 ounces (NI 43-101 compliant)
• 3 rigs drilling approximately 40,000 metres in 2012
• Proximal to current mining infrastructure
• Extension of Santoy 8 deposit
19
L62 Discovery
• L62 deposit 200 m from
infrastructure
• Open in all directions
• Expected to be in production 2H
2012
L62 Discovery
Shaft Extension Q3 2012
20
Regional Exploration: Neptune
Highlights of 2010 and 2011 drilling:
• 3.2 m @ 85.0 g/t
• 3.0 m @ 13.6 g/t
• 2.0 m @ 5.2 g/t
• 3.9 m @ 5.9 g/t
70,000 m of drilling between
Neptune, Santoy 8 and Santoy Gap
planned for 2012
21
Amisk Gold Project
• 100% ownership • 24,350 hectare property • 1.57 million ounces in NI 43-101 resource calculation • Proven mining district and “mining friendly” community • Close to infrastructure • Large bulk mineable potential • Mineralization begins at surface and has been tested to approximately 600 metres below surface NI 43-101 Resource update planned in Q2 2012 and PEA to be completed in Q3 2012
22
Amisk Location
23
Amisk Pit Shell
Claude Resources - Amisk Lake Project - Grade - Tonnage Sensitivity Table
Au Eq Cut-Off Total Resource Indicated Inferred
Tonnage Au Eq (gpt) Au (gpt) Ag (gpt) Total Oz Ind Oz % Inf Oz %
0.30 82,422,879 0.69 0.62 4.35 1,828,471 998,622 55% 824,675 45%
0.40 58,803,225 0.83 0.75 5.11 1,569,171 920,881 59% 644,854 41%
0.50 42,979,475 0.97 0.88 5.85 1,340,368 824,702 62% 512,676 38%
24
Madsen Exploration Project
• 100% ownership • 10,000 hectare property • 1.23 million ounces in NI 43-101 resource calculation • Historic production was 2.45 million ounces of gold from 1938 to 1976 • Similar type of geology to that of Goldcorp’s Red Lake Assets • All existing infrastructure is fully permitted Aggressive exploration program planned for 2012
25
Madsen Property
26
Madsen Mine Trend 2012 Exploration is focused on continued testing of the 8 Zone Trend as well as the
McVeigh and Austin Tuff depth continuity.
27
Madsen Property: Red Lake Camp
Starratt Olsen 164,000 oz @ 0.18 opt
Madsen Mine Historic Production 2.4 M oz @ 0.30 opt Austin East
Underground Drill Chambers
2012 exploration target areas
8 Zone
28
Madsen Cross Section
29
Madsen Infrastructure
Modern equipment and facilities:
• 500 ton per day permitted mill
• 5 compartment shaft to 4,125 feet
• Shaft capable of skipping 1,925 tpd
• Permitted tailings facility
Minimal capital required to bring Madsen into production
30
Exploration Summary
2012 2012 2011 2011
$ (in millions) Metres $ (in millions) Metres
Seabee $7.50* 129,600 $4.90* 100,000
Madsen $6.50 29,050 $3.85 18,000
Amisk $1.50 6,000 $1.74 10,000
Total $15.50 164,650 $6.66 128,000
*Excluding underground expenditures.
31
$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
$350Rubicon
Kirkland Lake
Explorers Producers
Peer Valuation (as of May 4, 2012)
Mar
ket
Cap/
Oz
Calculation based on National Instrument 43-101 ounces
32
Catalysts for 2012
Q1 • Closing of SEM Acquisition • Seabee Exploration Results (Santoy Gap and L62) • Seabee Reserve and Resource Update
Q2 • Amisk Resource Update • Amisk Exploration Results • Seabee Exploration Results (Neptune, Santoy Gap and L62)
Q3
• Shaft Extension Completed at Seabee • Mill Expansion Completed at Seabee • Madsen Exploration Results • PEA at Amisk
Q4 • Seabee Exploration Results (Santoy Gap and L62) • Madsen Exploration Results
33
Claude Resources Inc. Experience. Stability. Potential.
Creating the Capacity to
Discover. Develop. Deliver.
TSX: CRJ NYSE Amex: CGR
200, 224- 4th Avenue South Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7K 5M5 Canada P. 306.668.7505 F. 306.668.7500
34
May 10, 2012 Annual General Meeting