CO2 Shipping Concepts Newbuilt, Conversion and Dual Purpose carriers
Björn Munko
Carriers &Carriers &Offshore Units
CO Shipping ConferenceCO2 Shipping Conference London 2010
Company IntroductionDesign and supply of cargo handling systems & cargo tanks for gassystems & cargo tanks for gas carriers and offshore unitsLNG/Ethylene/LPG/CO2
> 25 years of experience> 25 years of experience> 100 gas carrier contractsship designs for all kind of gas
icarriersMain office: Bonn/GermanyDemerger of terminal business in 2007
2
CO2 Shipping Concepts for Carbon Capture and Storage Projects
Content:– TGE‘s experience and expertise concerning this
topic – Development of the complete shipping solution
for Cargon Capture and Storage (CCS) ProjectsLi f ti B ff St T t Offl diLiquefaction-Buffer Storage-Transport-Offloading
- CO2 Carrier DesignA il bilit f E i ti Shi- Availability of Existing Ships
3
TGE’s experience and expertise concerning this topicg p
• EPC contracts for LNG/Ethylene and LPG storages and terminals (export and import)and terminals (export and import)
• EPCS contracts for cargo systems of LPG FSOs (newbuild and conversion)(newbuild and conversion)
• Market leader for ethylene carriers with IMO type C cargo tankscargo tanks
• Design and fabrication (with subcontractor) of > 140 IMO type C cargo tanksyp g
• Conceptual studies and feasability studies for several CO2 shipping projects
4
LNG Eth l d LPG t i l ithLNG, Ethylene and LPG terminal with liquefaction plants
References (Examples):Small scale LNG productionSmall scale LNG productionterminal(1,500,000 Nm³/d, storage 30,000 cbm)Largest Ethylene/Propyleneterminalterminal(3 x 80,000 m³)Ethyelene storage with bullets(5 x 1,200 cbm, pdesign : 23 barg)
TGE‘
5
TGE‘s scope:General Contractor
M k t l d f th l i ith IMOMarket leader for ethylene carriers with IMO type C cargo tanks
References (Examples):biggest Ethylenebiggest Ethylenecarrier (5 x 22,000 m³)largest series ofEth lene carriersEthylene carriers(10 x 8,000 m³)first combinedLNG/Ethylene carrierwith electricpropulsionpropulsion
TGE‘s scope:shipdesign, gas plant andshipdesign, gas plant and tanks
6
The political economical drive for the implementation of CCSp
• Green House gas reduction• 20% CO2 reduction in the EU by 2020% 2 y• Coal fired power plants are the biggest CO2 emitters
- coal acounts for 2/5 of the world‘s energy mixcoal acounts for 2/5 of the world s energy mix- CCS for new power plants will be compulsory in the
future- CCS will be retrofitted to
existing power plantsg p p
7Source: www.bellona.org
The political economical drive for the implementation of CCSp
- Initial high costs for development of CCSEU i i t d h+ EU emissions trade scheme
– Currently priced at 24 $/mtonExpected price 50 $/mton by 2020– Expected price 50 $/mton by 2020
- CCS project viable at 45 – 64 $/mton (McKinsey)+ Subsidies of EUR 4 billion by the EU+ Subsidies of EUR 4 billion by the EU
CCS projects under development by all major energyCCS projects under development by all major energyplayers− RWE, ENI, Vattenfall, BP, Shell, etc., , , , ,
8
CO2 Capture, Transport and Storage Chain
C l Fi d P Pl• Coal Fired Power Plant (or steel mill, refinery,…)
• CO2 Capturing Processes• Pre Combustion• Post Combustion• Oxyfuel
• CO2 Transport2 p• CO2 Carrier
- Liquefaction, Transport, Offloadingq , p , g• Pipeline
- CompressionCo p ess o
9
CO2 Storage
10Source: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2005). IPCC Special Report on Carbon dioxide Capture and Storage
CO2 Capture – Post Combustion
11Source: Figueroa, J. D., Fout, T., Plasynski, S., McIlvried, H., and Srivastava, R. D. 2008. Advances in CO2 capture technology—the U.S. Department of Energy’scarbon sequestration program
CO2 Capture – Pre Combustion
12Source: Figueroa, J. D., Fout, T., Plasynski, S., McIlvried, H., and Srivastava, R. D. 2008. Advances in CO2 capture technology—the U.S. Department of Energy’scarbon sequestration program
CO2 Capture – Oxy Fuel
13Source: Figueroa, J. D., Fout, T., Plasynski, S., McIlvried, H., and Srivastava, R. D. 2008. Advances in CO2 capture technology—the U.S. Department of Energy’scarbon sequestration program
CO2 Liquefaction and Storage - Onshore
S d T i l• Send out Terminal• Liquefaction• Storage• Loading
15
CO2 Liquefaction and Storage - Barge
40 000 b CO2 FLSO40,000 cbm CO2 FLSO (Floating Liquefaction Storage and Offloading)
− 1.000.000 t/a throughput− power consumption 6.500 kW− l = 145 6 ml 145.6 m− b = 44.8 m− d = 18.75 m− Draught = 10.6 m
16
g
CO2 ShippingCO2 C i• CO2 Carrier
• Combined LPG/CO2 carrierC iti f 10 000 b t 40 000 b– Capacities from 10,000 cbm up to 40,000 cbm
CO2 Injection• Offshore
Mooring System• Onshore
Storage
CO2 Injection
− Mooring System− Direct Injection
Injection ia Platform
− Storage− Pipeline to field
CO2 H b“ − Injection via Platform− Pressure/Temperature
Increase
− „CO2 Hub“- either on liquefaction
side or on offloading
17
Increaseside or on offloading side
CO2 Carrier
Liquefaction System
Heating SystemSystem
Storage SystemPropulsion System Mooring/Unloading
SystemSystemDynamic Positioning System
18
Storage System – Cylindrical tank / bilobe tank
– Design Pressure• Pressure Built up vs Reliquefaction• Pressure Built-up vs Reliquefaction• Depends on Voyage Profile
– Material– Additional Grades (Ethylene/LPG)
19
F iblit f i ti i f CO2Feasiblity of existing gas carrier for CO2 Transport
• LNG carrier– Membrane Type
• LPG carriers, Semiref− Type C tanksMembrane Type
– Moss Type– SPB Type
• Ethylene carrier– Type C tanks
Design pressure too low
• LPG carriers, VLGCsType A tanks
May be suitable if the design pressure it above 6.5 barMostly severe filling limit– Type A tanks
Design pressure too low
• Fully pressurized
Mostly severe filling limitrestrictions due to design density or scantling draughty p
carriers– Type C tanks
Only a very limited number ofcarriers would be suitable forCO2
Design temperature too high
22
ConclusionsCO Li f ti St d Shi iCO2 Liquefaction Storage and Shipping• CCS will be demanded for future power plants
CO S• CO2 Shipping is a viable option to provide the logistics for CCSCO2 t t ith i ti i ld b• CO2 transport with existing carriers would be very limited
• Technical solutions exist for all options of the CO2• Technical solutions exist for all options of the CO2 transport chain by sea
• Combination as Ethylene/LPG/CO2 carrier willCombination as Ethylene/LPG/CO2 carrier will reduce risks for early movers
• TGE provides ship design, and the full cargo handlingTGE provides ship design, and the full cargo handling system including cargo tanks.
24
Thank you for your a you o youkind attention
for further information please mail to [email protected]
26