Creative Compensation Strategies to Maintain Morale and Retain Talent
Presented by
Edward Rataj, CCPManaging Director, CBIZ Human Capital Services
2
Strategic Edge Series
• Seven Core Principles to Maximize the Value of Your Business During Its Life and Upon its Sale – May 18th
• Creative Compensation Strategies to Maintain Morale and Retain Talent – June 22nd
• Don’t Be Held Captive: Go Captive to Manage Your Risk and Expenses – July 20th
• Federal Incentives That Can Show You the Money – August 17th • Protecting Your Legacy with Succession Planning – September 21st
• State Tax Nexus: No Physical Presence Required – October 26th
All these webinars are from 2:00 – 3:00 ET. Here is the link for registration for any of these webinars - www.cbiz.com/strategicedge
Agenda
• Explore turnover in the rebounding economy• Review steps for designing a market-based
compensation system• Recognition and sustaining high performance through a
merit matrix• Discuss compensation in closely held businesses• Answer your questions
3
Unemployment in Improving Economy
• Common perception, supported by monthly reports from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics:
• 10% unemployment• In reality, a strong negative correlation exists between
unemployment percentage and education:
Bureau of Labor Statistics Table A4: Employment status of the civilian population 25 years and over by educational attainment
Bachelor’s degree or above
Some college or an associate’s degree
High school graduate
Less than high school diploma
4.8%
9.8%
8.1%
15.3%
4
Projected Turnover as Economy Improves
• According to a recent WorldatWork survey, more than half of employees intend to leave their current job as the economy improves.
• The survey asked: Do you plan to pursue new job opportunities as the economy improves? – 60% — Yes, I intend to leave – 21% — Maybe, so I’m networking – 6% — Not likely, but I’ve updated my resume – 13% — No, I intend to stay.
www.worldatwork.org/waw/adimComment?id=35633 5
Compensation System Design
6
Designing a Market-Based Compensation System
• Plan and collect data• Ensure job documentation accuracy• Complete market analysis• Design pay structures• Model implementation costs• Assess internal equity• Create procedure manual• Report results
7
Purpose of a Compensation System
• Implement compensation philosophy• Ensure efficient allocation of resources• Provide rational basis for pay decisions• Assist supervisors in evaluating and rewarding
performance
8
Job Documentation
Job Documentation
Market Matches
9
Market Pricing Methodology
• What is market pricing?• Valuation of pay for jobs in the external labor markets• Key considerations when determining labor markets:
– Location
• Local• Region• Nation
– Industry
• Industry specific• Broad spectrum of employers
10
Market Pricing Methodology
• Reliable Data– Published survey data
• Major consulting and surveying firms• Statistically validated• Standard deviation analysis of data
• Unreliable data examples:– Self-reported data– DOL– Data from one or two competitors
11
Designing Salary Structures
Range Spread
Midpoint Differential
minimum
midpo
int
maximum
12
Assessing Current State of Compensation Program
13
Merit Matrix Approach
14
Compensation Strategy – Merit Matrix Approach
• Affects pay increases, not pay structure• Rewards performance• Focuses dollars on employees that are most likely to
leave because of pay
15
Merit Matrix - Concept
Hig
hL
ow
2
1
• Employee 1 ( ) and Employee 2 ( ) are both accountants with exactly the same tenure, experience, education and pay. Only performance differentiates them. To whom would you provide a higher pay increase, low-performing Employee 1 or high-performing Employee 2?
1 2
16
Merit Matrix - Concept
2 1
• In this example, all other factors are equal except current base salary. To whom would you provide a higher pay increase, high-paid Employee 1 or low-paid Employee 2?
Low High
COMPENSATION
17
Merit Matrix - Concept
2
1
• Finally, all other factors being equal, to whom would you provide a higher pay increase, high-paid/low-performing Employee 1 or low-paid/high-performing Employee 2?
Low HighCOMPENSATION
Hig
hL
ow
18
Merit Matrix - Example
Typical
Matrix
Performance 1 2 3 4Exceptional 3.5% 3.5% 3.0% 3.0%
Exceeds Expectation 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0%Effective 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.0%
Development Needed 2.5% 2.5% 2.0% 2.0%Critical Need for Improvement 2.5% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0%
Quartile in Range
19
Merit Matrix - Example
Best Practice
Matrix
Performance 1 2 3 4Exceptional 6.5% 5.5% 5.0% 4.0%
Exceeds Expectation 6.0% 5.0% 4.0% 3.0%Effective 5.0% 4.0% 3.0% 2.0%
Development Needed 2.0% 1.0% 0.0% 0.0%Critical Need for Improvement 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Quartile in Range
20
Merit Matrix - Example
Ultra-Aggressive
Matrix
Performance 1 2 3 4Exceptional 13.0% 11.0% 5.0% 3.0%
Exceeds Expectation 11.0% 6.0% 3.0% 1.0%Effective 4.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Development Needed 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%Critical Need for Improvement 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Quartile in Range
21
Results
Model fits within budget
Typical
Matrix
Performance 1 2 3 4Exceptional 8.0% 7.0% 6.0% 5.0%
Exceeds Expectation 6.0% 5.0% 4.0% 2.5%Effective 4.5% 3.5% 3.0% 2.0%
Development Needed 2.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%Critical Need for Improvement 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Cost SummaryPayroll: $30,400,917 Budget $: $1,064,032
Merit Increases: $1,071,120.86 Budget as % of Payroll: 3.5%
Percent Increase: 3.5%
Cost Detail
Performance First Second Third FourthExceptional $83,979 $184,222 $88,669 $15,200
Exceeds Expectations $109,175 $158,310 $58,617 $0Meets Expectations $108,116 $191,830 $36,698 $3,650
Development Needed $32,654 $0 $0 $0Critical Need for Improvement $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Cost: $1,071,121
Employee Count Detail
Performance 1 2 3 4Exceptional 24 36 16 4
Exceeds Expectations 36 60 20 0Effective 52 96 16 4
Development Needed 36 40 20 4Critical Need for Improvement 24 32 12 4
Total Employees: 536
Quartile in Range
Quartile in Range
Quartile in Range
22
Merit Matrix - ResultsCompany XYZ
Cost by Quartile
$0
$100,000
$200,000
$300,000
$400,000
$500,000
$600,000
1 2 3 4
Quartile in Range
Mer
it In
crea
se C
ost
Critical NeedforImprovement
MeetsExpectations
ExceedsExpectations
Exceptional
23
Merit Matrix - ResultsCompany XYZ
Costs by Performance Level
$0
$50,000
$100,000
$150,000
$200,000
$250,000
$300,000
$350,000
$400,000
Exceptional Exceeds Expectations Meets Expectations Development Needed Critical Need forImprovement
Performance
Co
st
Fourth
Third
Second
First
24
Merit Matrix - Employee Analysis
Perf- Merit New Merit
Last NameFirst Name Job Title Min Max Salary Quartile ormance Percent Salary Increase
Brown Stan HR Generalist $47,042 $72,915 $46,000 1 4 6.0% $47,042 $2,822.52Phillips Kevin IT Analyst $53,058 $84,892 $64,550 2 4 5.0% $64,550 $3,227.50Pence Skyler Construction Manager $47,042 $72,915 $76,000 4 5 5.0% $76,000 $3,800.00Pratt Jason Controller $70,169 $112,270 $103,299 4 2 0.0% $103,299 $0.00Beals Susan Maintenance Manger $47,042 $72,915 $59,000 2 3 3.5% $59,000 $2,065.00Duncan Elizabeth President $153,058 $229,587 $200,000 3 5 6.0% $200,000 $12,000.00
Salary Grade
Adjustment due to employee being below salary range
Lump sum increase due to employee being at top of salary range
25
Merit Matrix
• Cost neutral• Rewards performance• “Targeted” turnover• Fair and efficient method for administering pay• Accelerates employees to market competitive pay levels
26
Merit Matrix – Common Pitfalls
• Structures out of alignment with market– Garbage in, garbage out– May improperly allocate limited salary increase dollars based
upon the current competitiveness of pay
• Performance scores not calibrated– Supervisors can learn to game the system– Cheating is rewarded– Top performers may not be properly rewarded
• Matrix results outside of budget
27
Assessing “Reasonable” Executive Compensation in
Closely Held Businesses
28
• The determination of reasonable compensation is particularly important when:– Arm’s length transactions are less likely, – Large amounts of compensation are provided to a visible
position and – The boundaries between owners and employees are blurred.
• Examples include divorce cases, S and C corporations and executive holdings of a significant number of company shares.
Reasonable Compensation in Closely Held Businesses
29
• There is no single recognized definition of reasonable compensation.
• This is one of the key reasons that compensation frequently comes under scrutiny – without a clear approach to establishing what is reasonable, subjectivity bears heavy influence.
Reasonable Compensation Overview
30
• According to the IRS, there are two key elements of determining reasonable compensation:1. Intent
Is the payment in exchange for services provided?
2. Amount
Is the payment reasonable given the services rendered?
Reasonable Compensation Overview
31
• Compensation is reasonable only if the amount provided was both intended to be and treated as compensation at the time of payment.
• Intent is typically questioned when there is an appearance of “disguised dividends.”
• Considerations used in measuring intent include:1
1. The salary history of the employee
2. The dividend history of the corporation
3. The formality and timing of corporate action
4. The degree to which salary negotiations were conducted at arm’s length.
Reasonable Compensation – Intent
1 Moran, 290-4th T.M., Reasonable Compensation.
32
• “It is, in general, just to assume that reasonable and true compensation is only such amount as would ordinarily be paid for like services by like enterprises under like circumstances.” Regs. § 1.162-7(b)(3)
• The Internal Revenue Manual identifies several factors that IRS personnel should consider in determining the reasonableness of compensation, including:1
– The nature of the employee’s duties– The employee’s background and experience– The size of the business– The employee’s contribution to the success of the business– The amount paid by similar size business in the same area to equally
qualified employees for similar services
Reasonable Compensation – Amount
1 Moran, 290-4th T.M., Reasonable Compensation. This is not an exhaustive list, but rather a listing of factors recognized as principal considerations.
33
• Measuring Performance– The courts have recognized significant profitability as
rationalization of seemingly high executive compensation. This is particularly true for personal service organizations.
– Other financial ratios that may be considered as indicators of corporate success include revenue growth, return on shareholders’ equity, return on assets, return on sales, earnings per share and return on capital.1
Effect of Performance on Reasonable Compensation
1 This list is not necessarily comprehensive. Rather, it is a representative list of financial performance metrics cited by the courts as factors that may suggest superior performance.
34
Additional Considerations
• Nonprofit compensation• Fair pay based on race and gender• Online performance management• Sales compensation
35
Summary/Key Takeaways
• Market-based compensation system• Merit matrix• Compensation in closely held businesses
37
CBIZ CompCasts
CompCasts Nonprofit Quick Guide to Navigating Intermediate Sanctions
How to Set Pay Ranges that are Fair and Effective
Creating and Using a Salary Increase Matrix
Fair Pay: Maintaining Equality in Today’s Litigious Society
In development at: www.cbiz.com/hr/compcasts
37
QUESTIONS?
38
CBIZ Human Capital Services Contact
Edward RatajManaging Director 314.692.5884 [email protected]
Thank You