Transcript
  • 8/6/2019 Creative Thinking in Classroom

    1/2

    f some of the current school-supplycatalogs are an indication of whatgoes on in third- or fourth-grade artclasses right now, I believe the state ofteaching creative thinking is facing acruel and tacky fate.

    In any field of education, "what usedto be" wasn't always perfect. But in thelast 50 years, not much in the way ofstudio art-fine art-for kids has beenworked into the curriculum. Everychild seems to know who Vincent vanGogh was ("He cut off his ear!") or Mi-chelangelo. But how can we graduatechildren who can't draw or mix colorsor appreciate the poetry of modernsculpture? (Or for that matter, goodpoetry? But that's another story.)

    The relativity of art and the crafts ofart are easy to teach, with a little work.But if we're handing out pre-madeboats to paint or little foam frames todecorate, all we're doing is traininglittle future factory workers. There'snothing creative involved at all. Thepaints are prepackaged-every color,with the instructions for assembly.Even an image to copy for your paint-ing pleasure is included.

    The proliferation of these "kits"must make many overwhelmed teach-ers happy. But it scares the heck outof me. What a dreary activity art mustseem to be to these kids. Even if bysome chance the painted outcomeis satisfying to the young artist, whatwill he do to duplicate the feeling? Hewould need to buy another kit!

    Would he know he could perhapstake an old piece of wood or cardboardand just paint on that? Could he ever findthat color if he had to make it himself?

    Maybe it's me. I think I am a hybridin the art world, of which there areprobably many. I started with graphicart, the kind that's no longer used.We learned layout and design with T-Squares and pen and ink, which had tobe perfect. I was not very good! Switch-ing to theater arts, I then spent 15 yearsdesigning and building props.

    For those 15 years I learned by doing,a deeply satisfying way to learn. I wentfrom community theater to networktelevision, and learned how to work withno budget (teachers, sound familiar?)and with excessive "throw money at theproblem" and "get me two of them" bud-gets. And what an education it was!

    FORUMThoughts to Share

    I was surrounded by scenic artistswho could paint a landscape the size ofan auditorium wall or recreate a placein a playwright's head in perfect detail.To scale, no less!An d what a revelation! They wouldpaint with broom-size brushes or getdown on all fours and use cotton swabs.They would roll on their tummies onflat trolleys to paint continuous patterns.They would climb ladders to get a look attheir work. And so I learned adaptability.And the right tool for the right job, some-thing my students hear over and over.Prop builders are magicians, some-thing every good art teacher must alsobe . As an apprentice prop maker at JoePapp's New York Shakespeare Festivaland later at MR A Studio in Brooklyn, Iwatched model makers sculpt objects(albeit usually period objects) out ofcommon materials from the hardwarestore (not the art store) every day,

    On CreativeThinking inthe Classroomby Ruthann Perrypainting them to look like the realthing. Lots of research goes into get-ting the details right.And though most props are not per-fect, they must "read well" from the au-dience. Up close, most props are some-what crude looking if they've been built.They have to be able to take abuse, sothey're built strong. If they really ge tthrown around the stage a lot (think ofsome of Shakespeare's plays), they maybe replaced fairly frequently in a run, oneof the rare times prop people get to dothe same thing more than once.Every prop builder learns to be a jack-of-all-trades. And this was what servedme so well when I began to teach art.Sometimes my job was boring, asany apprentice's will be from time totime. There were days spent paintingtiny florets on set pieces or sewing littlelace flowers onto pillows. Other times,magic. But every day brought some-thing new to make, a new craft to learn.Wouldn't it be wonderful if art class was

    the same? An d how about a rule for arclass: All those who enter here can beas messy as it takes. You are allowed tocolor outside the lines. Just go for it.Every teacher knows a lesson thathe student takes part in is imprinted ona deeper level than one that is lecturedor read about So getting them to maketheir own artwork is crucial. And no t every kid is going to want to hear this, buthe creative process has to allow for longperiods of "not so good" and "adequate"before "great" comes along. Those kitsthe school supply companies are sellingare taking away the chance for childrento create something from start to finishan unforgettable experience.At the beginning of the school yearI always tell my young artists this: "Thvery first time young Michael Jordanpicked up a basketball, or that rock musician picked up his guitar, they stunkThe second time, still bad. The thirdtry? Maybe a basket, maybe one baof music. The on e hundredth time? Ohyeah baby. They were rockin'."So why is art an y different?" I ask"Te first time you try to draw thastill life, paint that sky or mold thaclay, you're most likely going to bombSo what? It just takes practice and patience. An d once you pick up the skillit sets you free to create whatever youcan think of. The mechanics are whastop so many people from thinking theyhave talent. It may not be easy. But neither is learning to play the piano or playa mean game of basketball. And it couldbe fun. Learn the mechanics and youmay surprise yourselfi."Giving students junky, mass-produced art projects so they have something to show for art class is wrongWhen did art class become so resultsoriented? And on on e class a week. Andwhy: to justify the department? MaybeArt departments are being cut everywhere. After nine years teaching elementary school art in a private schoolI was told they needed my classroomfor a science lab. I would be Art-on-aCart. And though I ended up leavingthat school, I understood the need forhands-on science. Really. I still remember frog dissections, don't you? NRuthannPerry s an art eacherand arist, and is the owner of MaidenheadStudio in Lawrenceville, New Jersey.

  • 8/6/2019 Creative Thinking in Classroom

    2/2

    COPYRIGHT INFORMATION

    TITLE: On Creative Thinking in the Classroom

    SOURCE: Arts Act 144 no2 O 2008

    The magazine publisher is the copyright holder of this article and it

    is reproduced with permission. Further reproduction of this article in

    violation of the copyright is prohibited.


Recommended