1
Ready by Five & Fine by Nine: New Requirements, New Opportunities
NAEYCNovember 18, 2009
Janice M. Gruendel, Ph.D., M.Ed.Yale Child Study Center
…the story of a state (and a nation)
2
For young children, these are the worst of times…
• Economic recovery to pre-recession levels at the state level will not occur until “late in the next decade.” (NGA, 2009)
• States will continue to face record fiscal deficits this year and, likely, through 2013. The risk of continued program cuts remains high.
• State early childhood programs will see increased demand from “at risk” children and families who are even more vulnerable due to the recession.
• Not all children who enter kindergarten now have the knowledge, skills and behaviors predictive the early school success.
• The achievement gap at grades 3 and 4 remains stubbornly intractable.
3
…and the best of times
• New federal fiscal resources are targeted at improving child/student outcomes and the programs that serve them.
• Federal resources require states to collect information about children, programs and professionals AND assure the information is accessible, reported and used.
• The neuroscience of early development provides a clear roadmap for continued and expanding investment.
• We are not starting from scratch. Research continues to clarify the relationship of program quality to desired child outcomes. New models for systems development and the management of children’s programs and services are emerging. And, in each state, we have learned a lot in the past decade.
4
To escape the ravages of fiscal cuts and to maximize the impact of these new opportunities,
we must transform our service, information and management systems, now.
The bottom line --- timing is everything.
5
To have ready children, we need to design an early childhood service system that begins with mothers (prenatally), includes
fathers and continues seamlessly through at least the third grade….
Early Educationand Care
PK-3
Health, Oral Health and Mental
Health Care
Family Support, including
parental literacy & HS completion
Early Intervention
Ready Families
CommunitiesState =
Ready Children
6
…an early childhood information system that can answer key statewide policy, planning and accountability questions for
many audiences…
Early Educationand Care
B-9
Health, Oral Health and Mental
Health Care
Family Support, including
parental literacy & HS completion
Early Intervention
Linkable data, pre-natal through
the elementarygrades
7
…and new models of organizing our knowledge, our programs and our practice.
Early Education (B-9) and Care:
Shared Services & Management Models; P-20 ed information
Health -- Health care reform; e-health information
Family Support – Linked social service,
education and workforce supports; Parent
engagement investments
Early Intervention -- HIPPA & FERPA adjustments
The Goal:Better
knowledge and more effective
action
8
And we need to embrace an emerging set of core principles…1. Science mattersUse the science of child development to guide policy decisions, practice and investment
2. Early Identification and Effective ActionIdentify early risks/stressors on the child and family and intervene with (a) early supports to buffer
the impact of stressors and (b) targeted interventions to remediate problems and strengthen development
3. Core Systems. Core Interactions. FidelityFocus on (a) core system components across sectors, (b) interactions between child and parent,
caregiver and/or teacher, and (c) implement with fidelity to proven models
4. Public-Private Partnerships & Co-Investment mattersNo one sector can solve the problems of un-readiness and the achievement gap alone. The best
partnership involves public-private, state- local stakeholders
5. Governance and accountability matters Responsibility for “systems building” must exist, and be accompanied by authority
6. Outcomes matter. Target. EvaluateDo not choose expansion over outcomes & quality. Evaluate progress regularly
7. Data mattersYou can’t know about outcomes, cost-effectiveness and Return on Investment (ROI) without data.
Focus on data development, interoperability and reporting
8. Sharing knowledge mattersFocus information dissemination on parents, providers and policy makers.
9. Celebrate, every now and then
9
Some Policy Questions re B-51. How many very young children do we have each year with multiple risks? Who are they? How early can we identify them? How are they progressing?
2. Is there a relationship between characteristics of the service workforce and child outcomes?
3. What program characteristics result in age-appropriate development and school readiness?
Some Policy Questions at K1. How many young children enter K
with low readiness levels as identified by their teachers?
2. Were they the same “at risk birth cohort” five years earlier?
3. Will they constitute the achievement gap in 3rd grade?
Some Policy Questions at 3rd
1. What are the characteristics of educational programs and other services that led to high performing vs. achievement gap kids at the end of the 3rd grade?
2. Will these same students be “achievement gap” kids at 6th?
We have articulated an initial set of statewide policy questions
10
Category A Sample of Key Questions at the Community Level
Health What is the prenatal experience of pregnant women across hospitals in our towns?
What do we know about health care coverage, dental care, obesity and behavioral health for our young children?
Are young children receiving recommended & required well-child visits with pediatricians in our community
For young children covered by government health programs, what do we know about access, quality and outcomes?
Early Ed & Care
Who needs, requests and attend child care and preschool in our towns?
What do we know about early care programs specific to infants and toddlers?
How can we get information about Head Start outcomes? Who is teaching in our early care and early education programs? How can we get description information on funding source, number
of children served & attendance for all ECE programs in out town?
Connecticut communities have also framed an initial set of policy questions
11
To move forward in these turbulent and sometimes uncharted waters, we will need a set of clear goals for our young children…
All Connecticut children, beginning with those born in 2006 will:
• Reach age-appropriate developmental milestones each year, birth through five
• Enter kindergarten healthy and with the knowledge, skills and behaviors necessary for early school success, and
• Demonstrate reading mastery by the fourth grade.
CT Early Childhood Education Cabinet
“Ready by Five, Fine by Nine”
(July 2006)
12
…and a longitudinal early childhood data system capable of providing timely, usable information
about what works and how
An Early Childhood Information System (ECIS) collects high-quality early childhood data on inputs and specific outcomes that can be analyzed and used to make decisions (within and beyond 0-5 system).***
*** Language proposed by the Early Childhood Data Collaborative National Governors Association National Conference of State Legislatures Data Quality Campaign Council of Chief State School Officers National Center on Children in Poverty PreK NOW/Pew Center on the States Center on the Child Care Workforce
13
An effective Early Childhood Information System (ECIS) has at least three core components that provide linked data
Unique Child Identifiers
Child/student & familyinformation SASIDs or
SSN (deeply encrypted)
Unique Teacher/staffIdentifiers
Workforce information SSN (deeplyencrypted)
Unique Program Identifiers
Information on dosage, duration and quality
STATE (and federal?) Data and Use LOCAL, REGIONAL Data and Use
ECIS
14
When we finally build the ECIS and connect up its core components, we will be able to better advocate
for the investment needed to improve our early childhood service sectors
Data are needed to answer:
What is the relationship between student outcomes and an early education and care sector in which wide disparities exist between programs that meet public school teacher qualifications (and compensation) and ECE programs funded through other state and federal resources?
What is the level of quality of the early education “instructional experience” in terms of teacher-child interactions, the use of curriculum standards, the nature of school-family interactions, and the exchange of information about children’s challenges and their progress?
15
As a field, we face an age old problem…“Water, water, every where, Nor any drop to drink”***
– Agencies holding data on individual children and their families• Department of Education (Child ID, K-Inventory, Spec Ed)• Department of Public Health (Vital Records, WIC, other)• Department of Social Services (HUSKY)• Department of Developmental Services (B-3 Program)• Department of Children and Families (Child Welfare)
– Agencies holding data on individual teachers and assistant teachers• Department of Education (Staff File)• Workforce Registry (Qualifications, Experience, etc.)
– Agencies holding data on early childhood programs • Department of Education (Agency Location/ Vendor Info)• Department of Public Health (Licensing Info) • Department of Social Services (Vendor Info)• United Way of CT (211 Info)
***The Rhyme of the Ancient Mariner (1798)
16
The data are resident within a wide variety of programs and services…
Department of Social Services
State Department of Education
Department of Public Health
Department of Children & Families
S-Chip Health
TANF
CCDBG/Child Care Subsidies
Child Care Centers
Head Start Collaboration Off.
ECE Workforce Registry
State preschool
Preschool Spec Ed
Family Res. Ctrs
Child Nutrition
K-3 Curriculum & Instruction
HS Supplement $
Family Literacy
Even Start
Early Reading
GED
WIC
Birth Registry
Special HealthCare Needs
Child Care Licensing
School-based Health Centers
Child Welfare
Children’s MH
Parent Programs
Home Visiting
Foster Care
17
Department of Social Services
Department of Labor
Healthy Start
Hartford Foundation
Other
Organizations /Providers
Connecticut Voices for
Children
Department of
Children and Families
Department of Public Health
Health Education Management and
Surveillance
Section
Infectious Diseases
Section
Environmental Health Section
Health Information Systems and Reporting
Division for Data
Collection and Analysis
Maternal and Child Health Programs
University of CT
William M . Mercer, Inc .
DPH Human Investigations
Committee
DPH Human Investigations
Committee
CT Adult Education (SDE
State Department of Education
Department of Developmental
Services
Department of Developmental
Services
Department of
Children and Families
Department of
Children and Families
40 State Agencies
United Way
Child Development
Infoline
Bureau of Rehabilitative
Services
And, in old and newer data systems that don’t talk well each other.
18Preschool K
Ready for K
3rdrd
Pass Mastery
Tests
Ready for PreK
Prenatal to Three
BornLearning
Early Childhood Longitudinal Data System
Because extant data reside within various agencies, the ECIS must work across them to define data elements related a common core of child, family and program outcomes
…a healthy birth
…annual, age-appropriate
growth
…ready for K
…academic mastery
by the end of3rd grade
19
Since 2005, state education departments have been building K-12 data systems. These systems must now stretch to include early ed and higher ed. Similarly, the evolving ECIS must link with (and, may flow from) federally funded Statewide Longitudinal Data Systems (P-20 SLDS)
19Preschool K3rd- 8th Grade
High School
Adult
Graduate HS
Prenatal to Three
Early Childhood Information System
P-20 Statewide Longitudinal Data Systems
College & Career
Ready for K
Pass Mastery
Tests
Ready for PreK
BornLearning
2020
Federal Requirements for a SLDS
Twelve elements are required, including the following PK-20 items: A unique student identifier Student-level enrollment, demographic and program participation
information Student-level information about the points at which students exit,
transfer in, transfer out, drop out or complete P-16 education Capacity to communicate with higher education systems A data audit system to assess data quality, validity and reliability Yearly test records of individual students Information about students not tested A teacher identifier system that can match teachers to students
For nearly all of these, there is an as-yet undefined or undeveloped early childhood data analog. This is one good place to start!!!!!
2121
ARRA Race to the Top SLDS (P-20) Requirements
1. There must be a P-20 statewide longitudinal data system
2. There must be a plan to ensure that SLDS data are accessible to and used to inform and engage key stakeholder, including parents, students, LEA personnel, community members…
3. SLDS data along with instructional data is available and accessible to researchers so that they can evaluate the effectiveness of instructional materials, strategies, and approaches for different types of students (e.g., students with disabilities, ELL, students whose achievement is well below or above grade level)
22
FEDERAL FUNDS CAN HELP US CONTINUE TO INVEST…
ARRA and FFY 10 grants to/ through state government
ARRA State Fiscal Stabilization Fund (Education)ARRA Statewide Longitudinal Data SystemsARRA Race to the TopARRA Statewide Advisory Council for Early Education and CareARRA IDEA Part B and Part C ARRA CCDBG Grant ARRA Title I Funds
FFY10 Early Learning Challenge GrantsFFY10 Home Visiting Grants
ARRA and FFY 10 grants direct to local communities/LEAs
ARRA Head Start local program expansionARRA Early Head Start local expansionARRA Investment in Innovations (i-3) (LEA/community philanthropy partnerships for educational innovation)
23
ARRA SLDS (SDE) Due to the feds 12.4.09Could provide some funding for next stage Early Childhood Information System (ECIS) as part of P-20 Statewide Longitudinal Data System
ARRA Statewide Advisory Council for Early Ed and
Care Submits its own grantDue to the feds by August 10, 2010
CT award: $582,000 one timeSAC grant application makes recommendations re: (a) Unified early childhood data system (b) Early care and ed quality improvement
FFY 10 Early Learning Challenge
Grants
Not clear who will submitLikely due in Spring 2010
US Total $8 billion over 8 years
Key components: (a) Early childhood data
system(b) (b) B-5 quality
improvement system (QRIS)
(c) ECE workforce plan
ARRA CCDBG (DSS)$1.8 m funds now in CT for Infant & Toddler quality, and ECE quality improvementCould support:: (a) ECIS and (b) Pilot required QRIS system (Early Care and Ed quality)
BUT TIMING IS EVERYTHING…..
24
Statutory authorization can help: New Connecticut law in 2007
CT General StatutesSection 10-16s (d)(1-3)
Section 10-16s(d)(1)
The Cabinet will develop and implement anaccountability plan for early childhood servicesby Dec. 1, 2008
Identify and define population indicators, program and system measures re entry to K
Section 10-16s(d)(2)
The Cabinet will consider data sharing agreements between state agencies
Analyze whether data can be combined to assess children’s progress toward school readiness
Section 10-16s(d)(3)
State funded providers of early childhood education shall employ program measures in 10-16s(d)(1)to evaluate effectiveness of their services
Each provider reports results beginning July 1, 2009
25
…More statutory help in 2009
PA 09-03Dept’s of Social Services,Education & Public Healthto develop single report form for ECE
PA 09-10Same dept’s to report byJan 1, 2010 to CGA onways to simplify ECE reporting
PA 09-06State Dept of Ed to assign unique child, staff and program IDs for preschool and child care programsthat receive any public funding in order to track(a) children’s health, safety and learning, (b) workforcecharacteristics, (c) programcharacteristics
PA 09-241State Dept of Ed to provide data requested by non-profits within 60 days. reasonable cost can be Assessed
PA 09-05Agencies within CT HealthInfo Network (CHIN) can transmit personally identifiable information for network development and analyses in response to network Inquiries
26
There is a clear “cost of failure” if the early childhood field does not move now in the direction of transformative change…
• We will continue to perpetuate the “ultimate disconnect” between investment and return
• Disparities in development will continue to characterize the early lives of our most vulnerable children
• The intergenerational pattern of un-readiness and diminished educational success will continue unabated
• Too many children will continue to stand unready at the kindergarten door and too many schools will be unready for them, when we know and can do better…..
27
The Ultimate Disconnect
Age
Brain's "Malleability"
Spending on Health,Education and Welfare
0 3 10 70
$$
28
Disparities in Early Vocabulary Growth are Evident Early in Children’s Lives
16 mos. 24 mos. 36 mos.
Cu
mu
lati
ve V
ocab
ula
ry (
Word
s)
College Educated Parents
Working Class Parents
Welfare Parents
Child’s Age (Months)
200
600
1200
Source: Hart & Risley (1995)
29
1. If infants and toddlers don’t get quality early learning, they enter preschool behind.
2. If preschoolers don’t have quality early learning experiences, they enter kindergarten behind.
3. When children enter school behind, they are more likely to be held back, need special education, fail state Mastery Tests, drop out of high school and become engaged with the welfare and corrections systems.
And then they have children.
30
10% -- 40% of children born in 2006 are at risk41,789 Births18,279 @ 185% FPL (44%) 8,112 mothers w/inadequate prenatal care (19%)
14,132 have an unmarried mother (34%) 3,881 have a teenage mother (9.3%) 4,597 have a mother w/o HS degree (11%)
7,036 referred to B-3 for delays (16.8%) 4,150 accepted/enrolled B-3 as of 3.1.09 (10%)
The CT Headline:
TOO MANYUNREADY
K Teachers rate 23% - 30% of entering K’s at very low readiness levels in language and literacy2006No Teacher Rating Entry to K Inventory Scores by Student
2007: Total rated by K teachers: 38,67411,345 Lowest Literacy Skill Level (29%) 9,699 Lowest Language Level (25%)
2008: Total rated: 40,25810,111 Lowest Literacy Skill Level (25%) 9,263 Lowest Language Level (23%)
Nearly 1/3rd of CT’s exiting 3rd gradersdemonstrate very low level reading skills200612,760 Reading Basic/Below (30.8%)
Total tested: 41,460
200712,787 Reading Basic/Below (30.7%)
Total tested: 41,652
200812,998 Reading Basic/Below (31.6%)
Total tested: 41,133
31
AECF defines the DATA DEFICIT
America’s “progress in harnessing the power of data to optimize outcomes for vulnerable children and families falls far short of what is possible, far
short of what is needed, and far short of what private industry has achieved in its efforts to maximize profits…
In particular, this data deficit remains glaring for two types of information essential to improved decision-making: (a) population data on the needs,characteristics, and well-being of vulnerable children and families and (b)
performance data measuring the outcomes of government-funded programs and services to support this population.
In addition to these data quality issues, human service systems alsolag behind in the use of sophisticated management information tools that can spur rigorous analysis and put usable information into the hands of
decision making practitioners.”
32
In Connecticut, about 40,000 children will stand at the kindergarten door each year.
Will they be ready?
Will we?
33
We MUST, because the future is now…