ECE 678
Integrated Telecommunications Networks
Project Report
Design of Optical Switch Router
Professor: Dr. Martinez
Group Member: Yun ZhaoYeliang Zhang
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
University of Arizona
Spring 2002
Content
Abstract................................................................................................................................31. Introduction..................................................................................................................32. Optical Communication System..................................................................................4
2.1 Overview of Optical Communication System.....................................................42.2 Advantage of Optical Communication System...................................................5
3. Optical Communication System..................................................................................63.1 Overview of All-Optical Network.......................................................................63.2 Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexing (DWDM)..........................................73.3 Generalized Multi-protocol Label Switch (GMPLS)..........................................93.4 Optical Switching Router..................................................................................12
4. Optical Switching Technology..................................................................................134.1 Switch versus Route..........................................................................................134.2 O-E-O Switch....................................................................................................134.3 O-O-O Switch....................................................................................................13
5. Optical Components/Elements..................................................................................145.1 Optical Component Characteristics...................................................................145.2 Micro Electro-mechanical System (MEMS).....................................................165.3 Tunable Laser....................................................................................................175.4 Tunable Filter.....................................................................................................185.5 Wavelength Converter.......................................................................................195.6 Optical Amplifier...............................................................................................20
5.6.1 Erbium Doped Fiber Amplifier (EDFA)...................................................205.6.2 Semiconductor Optical Amplifier (SOA)..................................................21
5.7 Optical Cross Connect (OXC)...........................................................................235.8 Tunable Optical Add-Drop Multiplexer (TOADM)..........................................23
6. Optical Switching Router Design..............................................................................246.1 LSR Forwarding Plane Design #1.....................................................................246.2 LSR Forwarding Plane Design #2.....................................................................266.3 LSR Control Plane Design.................................................................................27
7. Conclusion.................................................................................................................28Reference...........................................................................................................................29
2
Abstract
This paper deals with the design of optical switching router. The paper talks about the
concepts of all-optical network, dense wavelength division multiplexing and generalized multi-
protocol label switching, optical switching technology. The various optical components and
elements like Optical Amplifiers, Optical Add/Drop Multiplexers and tunable lasers are
described. Some sample optical products are listed on the paper. Finally, several draft designs of
optical switching router architecture are proposed in this paper.
1. Introduction
One of the major issues in the networking industry today is tremendous demand for more
and more bandwidth. With the development of Internet technology, a wide variety of
applications, such as multimedia communications (audio and video streams), database
applications, etc., have been deployed on Internet. All these applications need much more high
bandwidth. Before the introduction of optical networks, the reduced availability of fibers became
a big problem for the network providers. However, with the development of optical networks and
the use of Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexing (DWDM) technology, a new and probably, a
very crucial milestone is being reached in network evolution.
Optical fiber has significant advantages compared with the electrical transmission line. It is
no doubt that the future of the network infrastructure lies in the field of fiber optics. Optical fiber
is significantly smaller and lighter than electrical cables. Optical fiber provides the huge
bandwidth, low loss rate, and cost effectiveness to enable this emerging network backbone.
Optical fiber is more secure than copper wire. Given that fiber has a potential bandwidth of
approximately 50 Tb/s [1], nearly four orders of magnitude higher than peak electronic data rates.
Therefore, every effort should be made to maximize the capabilities of the fiber optic network.
DWDM technology supports multiple simultaneous channels (of different wavelengths) on
a single fiber. In DWDM, the optical transmission spectrum is divided into a number of non-
overlapping wavelength, and with each wavelength supporting a single communication channel.
Thus, by allowing multiple DWDM channels to coexist on a single fiber, we can tap into the huge
fiber bandwidth and throughput. This simple concept has changed the landscape of
telecommunication. DWDM telecommunication systems have the transmission capability that
exceeds terabits per second; and systems supporting hundreds of gigabits per second are
becoming commercially available. Unfortunately, since much of today’s network infrastructure
3
was developed to support voice traffic, an efficient and ultra-high backbone networks based on
DWDM is yet to be realized.
Meanwhile, Multi-protocol label switching (MPLS), a new network protocol is emerging.
MPLS is growing in popularity as a set of protocols for provisioning and managing core
networks. The networks may be data-centric like those of ISPs, voice-centric like those of
traditional telecommunications companies, or a converged network that combines voice and data.
At least around the edges, all these networks are converging on a model that uses the Internet
Protocol (IP) to transport data.
Generalized MPLS (GMPLS) is proposed shortly after MPLS. The premise of GMPLS is
that the idea of a label can be generalized to be anything that is sufficient to identify a traffic
flow. For example, in an optical fiber whose bandwidth is divided into wavelengths, the whole of
one wavelength could be allocated to a requested flow. The Label Switch Router (LSR) at either
end of the fiber simply have to agree on which frequency to use. Unlike with non-generalized
labels, the data inside the requested flow does not need to be marked at all with a label value;
instead, the label value is implicit in the fact that the data is being transported within the agreed
frequency band. On the other hand, some representation of the label value is needed in the
signaling protocol so that control messages between the LSRs can agree on the value to use.
The tremendous bandwidth of DWDM technology and devices and the innovative GMPLS
gives us a chance to step into All-Optical Network. Optical Switching Router is going to be a
very important and core part of All-Optical Network.
In this paper, we are focused on the design of Optical Switching Router and the optical
components.
2. Optical Communication System
2.1 Overview of Optical Communication System
The basic concept of an optical communication system is illustrated in figure 1. To begin, a
serial/parallel bit stream in electrical form from electrical storage medium is presented to a
modulator, which encodes the data appropriately for fiber transmission. A light source (laser or
Light Emitting Diode - LED) is driven by the modulator and the light focused into the fiber. The
light travels down the fiber will be amplified or regenerated by the repeater/amplifier during
which time it may experience dispersion and loss of strength. At the receiver end the light is fed
to a detector and converted to electrical form. The signal is then amplified and fed to another
detector, which isolates the individual state changes and their timing. It then decodes the
4
sequence of state changes and reconstructs the original bit stream. The received electrical bit
stream may then be fed to a using device.
Optical sources
(Laser/LED)
E/Omodulator
Electrical Information
Repeater/Amplifier
Photodetector
Decision Device(Error-Checking)
Informationsink/storage
Amplifier/equalizer
fiber fiber
transmitter(electrical)
receiver(electrical)(light)
Figure 1 Block diagram of basic optical communication system [2].
2.2 Advantage of Optical Communication System
Optical communication has significant advantages compared to electrical communication.
First, optical fiber is significantly smaller, lighter and cheaper than electrical cables for the same
capacity of cables. In the wide area environment a large coaxial cable system can easily involve a
cable of several inches in diameter and weighing many pounds per foot. A fiber cable to do the
same job could be less than one half an inch in diameter and weigh a few ounces per foot. This
means that the cost of laying the cable is dramatically reduced.
Figure 2 The capacity of fiber over the years [3].
Second, the data transmission rate of optical communication is tremendous. Figure 2 shows
that the data rate of a single fiber (TDM) in use in 1998 is about 10 Gbps. This is very high in
5
digital transmission terms. In telephone transmission terms the very best coaxial cable systems
give about 2,000 analog voice circuits. A 150 Mbps fiber connection gives just over 2,000 digital
telephone (64 Kbps) connections [4]. By sending many (“wavelength division multiplexed”)
channels on a single fiber, we can increase this capacity a hundred and perhaps a thousand times.
Third, optical communication does not have electrical connections. Data are transmitted via
different channel. Each channel has its own wavelength. There is no electromagnetic effect
during transmission. Because the connection is not electrical, you can neither pick up nor create
electrical interference (the major source of noise). Thus the signal interference is almost reduced
since each channel is independent to another. This is one reason that optical communication has
so few errors. There are very few sources of things that can distort or interfere with the signal. In
a building this means that fiber cables can be placed almost anywhere electrical cables would
have problems, (for example near a lift motor or in a cable duct with heavy power cables). In an
industrial plant such as a steel mill, this gives much greater flexibility in cabling than previously
available. In the wide area network environment there is much greater flexibility in route
selection. Cables may be located near water or power lines without risk to people or equipment.
Also, the optical communication is more secure than copper wire.
3. Optical Communication System
3.1 Overview of All-Optical Network
It is predictable that the current Internet is evolving to an All-Optical network in the nearby
future. With the developments in DWDM technology, All-Optical Network offers an almost
unlimited potential for bandwidth. There is no O/E or E/O conversion in the optical core network.
With DWDM as the optical backbone, GMPLS as the control plane, and optical switching router
as the router in the optical core network, All-Optical Network is the most exciting network
technology. All-Optical Network increases network throughput, provides high transmission rate
and low loss rate, provides Quality of Service (QoS) and Class of Service (CoS). Video on
Demand (VOD) and long haul broadband transmission is not a dream in the future. All-Optical
Network can achieve terabit-per-second bandwidth easily. We know the highest speed of
electrical signal is about 2.5~4 Gbps. Bandwidth bottleneck of electrical signal is removed once
All-Optical Network is implemented. Figure 3 shows a picture of All-Optical Network.
6
Figure 3 All-Optical Networks
3.2 Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexing (DWDM)
First, Let’s take a look at Wavelength Division Multiplexing (WDM). WDM is the basic
technology of optical networking. It is a technique for using a fiber (or optical device) to carry
many separate and independent optical channels. Each channel is transmitted at a different
wavelength (or frequency). Each channel can be view as a lightpath. Multiple wavelengths are
multiplexed into a single optical fiber and multiple lightpath data are transmitted. Because each
channel is independent, there is no interference. It is the cost effective technology and is used
widely in long haul network. In fact, WDM is one type of FDM. Another way of envisaging
WDM is to consider that each channel consists of light of a different color. Thus a WDM system
transmits a “rainbow”. Actually at the wavelengths involved the light is invisible but it's a good
way of describing the principle.
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
Fiber link
multiplexer demultiplexer
Figure 4 WDM scheme
7
Figure 5 shows there are three wavelength windows in optical communications: 850nm,
1310nm and 1550 nm. One simple form of WDM is using 1310 nm as one wavelength and 1550
nm as the other or 850 nm and 1310 nm.
Figure 5 Wavelength Window of Optical Transmission
This type of WDM can be built using relatively simple and inexpensive components and
some applications have been in operation for a number of years using this principle. Dense WDM
however is an evolution of WDM. Dense WDM refers to the close spacing of channels. There is
no accurate and unanimous definition of DWDM. To some, a series of WDM channels spaced at
3.6 nm apart qualifies for the description. Someone define DWDM if the number of multiplexing
wavelengths are larger than 40. Others use the term to distinguish systems where the wavelength
spacing is 1 nm per channel or less [5].
fiber plantTx
Rx
Rx
Tx
1533nm
1557nm 1557nm
1533nm
1533nm / 1557nm WDM Coupler
Figure 5 Sparse WDM.
Figure 5 shows an example of a very simple WDM system. Wavelength selective couplers
are used both to mix (multiplex) and to separate (demultiplex) the signals. The distinguishing
characteristic here is the very wide separation of wavelengths used (different bands rather than
different wavelengths in the same band). There are many variations around on this very simple
theme. Some systems use a single fiber bi-directionally while others use separate fibers for each
direction (as illustrated). Other systems use different wavelength bands from those illustrated in
8
the figure (1310 and 1550 for example). The most common systems run at very low data rates (by
today's standards). Common application areas are in video transport for security monitoring and
in plant process control [6].
Tx1
Tx2
. .
Tx1
Tx2
TxN
Rx1
Rx2
RxN
. .. .
Rx1
Rx2
RxN
TxN
1 , 2 . . . N
Figure 6 Dense WDM
Figure 6 shows how a DWDM system works. Ns share one optical fiber link. Each optical
channel is allocated its own wavelength or a small range of wavelengths. A typical optical
channel might be 1 nm wide. This channel is really a wavelength range within which the signal
must stay. It is normally much wider than the signal itself. The width of a channel depends on
many things such as the modulated bandwidth of the transmitter, its stability and the tolerances of
the other components in the system.
3.3 Generalized Multi-protocol Label Switch (GMPLS)
Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) is growing in popularity as a set of protocols for
provisioning and managing core networks [17]. The networks may be data-centric like those of
ISPs, voice-centric like those of traditional telecommunications companies, or a converged
network that combines voice and data. At least around the edges, all these networks are
converging on a model that uses the Internet Protocol (IP) to transport data.
Non-generalized MPLS overlays a packet switched IP network to facilitate traffic
engineering and allow resources to be reserved and routes pre-determined. It provides virtual
links or tunnels through the network to connect nodes that lie at the edge of the network. For
packets injected into the ingress of an established MPLS tunnel, normal IP routing procedures are
suspended; instead the packets are label switched so that they automatically follow the tunnel to
its egress.
Traditionally, provisioning in optical networks has required manual planning and
configuration resulting in setup times of days or even weeks and a marked reluctance amongst
network managers to de-provision resources in case doing so impacts other services. Where
control protocols have been deployed to provision optical networks they have been proprietary
9
and have suffered from interoperability problems. With the success of MPLS in packet switched
IP networks, optical network providers have driven a process to generalize the applicability of
MPLS to cover optical networks as well, the result of which is the set of internet drafts that
collectively describe “Generalized MPLS” (GMPLS). These drafts generalize:
the MPLS data forwarding model . such that it includes current practice in optical
networks
the MPLS control protocols . so that they can be used as a standardized and interoperable
way of provisioning optical networks
Other, related work to standardize the management and configuration of optical networks is
ongoing in the development of the Link Management Protocol (LMP) [8] and of optical
extensions to OSPF.
Figure 7 shows application of MPLS.
Figure 7 MPLS Application (from Trillium®)
MPLS uses a technique known as label switching to forward data through the network.
Before data packet traversing MPLS network, the Label Edge Router (LER) will partition each
incoming data packet into a set of “Forwarding Equivalence Classes (FECs)” and assign each
FEC with a small and fixed-format label. When a packet is forwarded to its next hop, the label is
sent along with it. At each hop across the network, the label on the incoming packet is used as the
index in the forwarding table that contains the outgoing interface and a new label that are to
10
replace the incoming label before it is transmitted to the next hop. When a packet reaches the
egress router, the label is removed and the packet is forwarded according to the original network-
layer routing scheme.
As a packet traverses a MPLS enabled network it must make three transitions. First, it must
go from its native layer 3 forwarding into labeled MPLS forwarding. This process entails the
adding of a label to the head of the packet. Second, a labeled packet must be able to traverse an
MPLS path. This path consists of all the devices that know how this particular packet (and
packets like it) needs to traverse a network. This path is called a Label Switch Path (LSP). It is a
connection-oriented path that is setup ahead of the forwarding of any packets. Finally a packet
must make its way back into layer 3 forwarding. This process consists of removing the label
from the head of the packet and then sending it to the appropriate layer 3 protocol for additional
handling. In a MPLS enabled network, layer 3 forwarding is used by the edges of the network,
and MPLS forwarding is used in the core of the network. Figure 8 shows a two LSPs in a MPLS
network.
Figure 8 Two LSPs in an MPLS Packet-Switched Network
The path that data traverses through a network is defined by the transition in label values,
as the label is swapped at each LSR. Since the mapping between labels is constant at each LSR,
the path LSP is determined by the initial label value. The decision that each packet is examined to
determine which LSP it should use and hence what label to assign to it is a local matter to each
LER. But it is likely to be based on factors including the destination address, the quality of
service requirements and the current sate of the network. This flexibility is one of the key features
that make MPLS useful.
11
The premise of Generalized MPLS is that the idea of a label can be generalized to be
anything that is sufficient to identify a traffic flow. For example, in an optical fiber whose
bandwidth is divided into wavelengths, the whole of one wavelength could be allocated to a
requested flow. The LSRs at either end of the fiber simply have to agree on which frequency to
use. Unlike with non-generalized labels, the data inside the requested flow does not need to be
marked at all with a label value; instead, the label value is implicit in the fact that the data is
being transported within the agreed frequency band. On the other hand, some representation of
the label value is needed in the signaling protocol so that control messages between the LSRs can
agree on the value to use.
Generalized MPLS extends the representation of a label from a single 32-bit number to an
arbitrary length byte array and introduces the Generalized Label object (in RSVP) and
Generalized Label TLV (in CR-LDP) to carry both the label itself and related information. The
following subsections describe how the switching quantities used in optical networks are
represented as GMPLS labels.
3.4 Optical Switching Router
Optical Switching Router is such kind of router that switch labeled packet directly inside
the optical core network, not route the packet hop by hop based on the packet head information.
Traditionally, router is built to route packet according the routing table, which resident in the
router. This kind of routing is a hop-by-hop routing. GMPLS provide a simple and fast way to
switch the labeled packet, if packet is labeled at the edge LSR.
Optical Switching Route has the following parts:
Data Forwarding Plane — the functions are label attaching, label switching and
forwarding.
Control Plane — the functions are table lookup, processing, wavelength assignment,
queuing decisions, etc.
Interface with other legacy network such as ATM, Gigabit Ethernet, SONET.
We will discuss the detail of Optical Switching Router later after introduction of optical
components and elements.
12
4. Optical Switching Technology
4.1 Switch versus Route
Basically, there is no apparent way to distinguish which technology is switching or routing.
According to the OSI/ISO network reference model, a network device forward an IP packet
directly from one to the other, such device is a layer 2 switch. If a network device dynamically
route a IP packet based on the routing table, which is a collection of network information with all
other routers, such device is called router or layer 3 switch. Switch is fast and simple, it forwards
packet directly. Router is much more complicated, slower. Usually backbone network router is a
kind of super computer.
4.2 O-E-O Switch
Currently most of Optical Switch is O-E-O switch. Incoming signals are converted from
Optical domain to Electrical domain, then signals are switched electrically. Once finishing
switch, outgoing signals are converted back to optical domain. Figure 9 shows structure of O-E-O
optical switch. From the figure, we can see a optical signal from 1290 nm to 1570 nm wavelength
is switched to a fixed 1.3 m output.
Figure 9 O-E-O Switch
If we need high bandwidth beyond 10 Gbps, O-E-O switch is not a ideal candidate due to
its bandwidth bottleneck. Thus, we need O-O-O switch.
4.3 O-O-O Switch
All-Optical switch (O-O-O switch) has advantages over O-E-O switch. Its complexity is a
flat function and is independent of bit rate, it can get up to 20 Tbps bandwidth. But its
implementation is not easy. Currently, O-O-O switch is in the research lab and its application is
in the near future.
CDR Clock and Data RecoveryP Header ProcessingACS Automatic Crosspoint Selection
13
5. Optical Components/Elements
Optical components and elements used to build a Optical Switching Router include Micro
Electro-mechanical System (MEMS), Tunable Laser, Wavelength Converter, Optical Amplifier,
Optical Cross Connect (OXC), Tunable Optical Add-Drop Multiplexer (TOADM), etc. We will
first look through the component characteristics.
5.1 Optical Component Characteristics
In order to describe optical component characteristics, we categorize the components to
three categories [10]:
Interconnection: Optical Cross Connect, Optical Add-Drop Mulitplexer, Wavelength
Converter
Optical Amplifier: Semiconductor Optical Amplifier (SOA), Erbium Doped Fiber
Amplifier (EDFA)
Light Source: Laser, LED
Interconnection Characteristics:
Insertion loss: the difference in power levels between the input and output of the device
under test
Crosstalk: indicates the amount of power that enters a channel form neighboring
channels. Typically, it is around 25 dB.
Repeatability and Switch time:
Polarization dependent loss (PDL): the peak-to peak output power variation when the
input is exposed to all possible polarization states
Center Wavelength: A demultiplexer's output center wavelength must coincide with the
channel center wavelength
Fresnel Reflection: Fresnel reflection results from boundary interfaces between two
materials with different refractive indices.
Optical Amplifier Characteristics:
Noise: Optical Amplifiers introduce noise. This becomes significant as more and more
amplifiers are cascaded in the system.
Gain: The gain varies with wavelength
Gain Flatness: measure of the difference in gain over the range of wavelengths. The gain
differences is small for one fiber amplifier, but becomes more substantial over longer
links due to the cascade of amplifiers. These gain differences promote linear crosstalk.
Bandwidth
14
Saturation Level: The upper limit of linear range.
Dynamic Nonlinearity: Channels are sometimes added or dropped, and the number and
position of the channels in use changes. These changes affects the amplifier response.
Light Source Characteristics:
Peak Wavelength: The peak wavelength is the wavelength at which the source emits the
most power. Since the peak wavelength is the operating wavelength, we choose those that
can be transmitted with the least attenuation over optical fiber. Thus, 780, 850, 1300, and
1550 nm are usually used. Saturation Level: The upper limit of linear range.
Spectral Width: Ideally, the light transmitted by light emitters is concentrated at the peak
wavelength. In practice, the light is emitted in a range of wavelengths centered at the
peak wavelength. The spectral width is the width of this range. The smaller the spectral
width, the better the system performance, as chromatic dispersion is minimized
Power: The output power of the source must be large enough to provide sufficient power
at the detector after fiber attenuation and other losses are taken into account.
Speed: The more quickly the source can turn on and off, the greater the bit rate and
bandwidth possible.
Another Characteristics is the fiber band. From Table 1, we can see C, L and U bands are
commonly used [7].
Table 1 Fiber Band
5.2 Micro Electro-mechanical System (MEMS)
MEMS device is a mechanical integrated circuit where the actuation force required moving
the parts may be electrostatic, electro-magnetic or thermal. These silicon micromachines are built
just the same way as a silicon integrated circuit. Starting with a silicon wafer, one deposits and
patterns materials such as polysilicon, silicon nitride, silicon dioxide and gold in a sequence of
Band Descriptor Range (nm)
O bandOriginal 1260 to 1360
E band Extended 1360 to 1460
S band Short wavelength 1460 to 1530
C band Conventional 1530 to 1565
L band Long wavelength 1565 to 1625
U bandUltralong wavelength 1625 to 1675
15
steps, producing a complicated three-dimensional structure. However, unlike an integrated
circuit, at the end one releases the devise or etches pats of it away, leaving pieces free to move.
Because they are built using IC batch-processing techniques, these devices, albeit complicated,
are inexpensive to produce because many are fabricated in parallel [8].
VLSI fabrication techniques also allow designers to integrate micromechnical, analog, and
digital microelectronic devices on the same chip, producing multifunctional integrated systems.
Contrary to intuition, MEMS devices have proven to be robust and long-lived, especially ones
whose parts flex without microscopic wear points. MEMS devices have a number of desirable
attributes to offer to the systems architect such as small size, high speed, low power, and a high
degree of functionality. In particular, many of us believe that the size scale at which these
machines work well make them a particularly good match to optics problems where the devices,
structures, and relevant wavelengths range in size from one to several hundred microns. MEMS
allow the device to be high port count and data-rate independent.
The possible application area range from data modulators, variable attenuators, active
remote odes, active equalizers, add/drop multiplexers, optical switches, power limiters and
MEMS-based Optical Cross connect (OXC).
There are two types of MEMS: 2D MEMS and 3D MEMS. Figure 10 and 11 shows the 2D
and 3D MEMS architectures.
Figure 10 2D MEMS for optical crossconnect switching[8]
16
Figure 11 3D MEMS architecture [8]
Mirror control for 2D MEMS switch is binary: on(1) and off(0). 2D MEMS is simple and
mature technology. 3D MEMS provides very large port count up to over 1000 input and output
ports. The drawback of 3D MEMS is its complexity and is still in the research lab.
5.3 Tunable Laser
Tunable laser is an important light emitter. The tuning methods are mechanical tuning,
acousto-optical tuning, electro-optical tuning and injection current tuning, etc. Table 2 summarize
the tunable laser[7].
Nortel has a 8 channel LCW508ET tunable DFB laser. It is a InGaAsP DFB laser, tunable
wavelength from 1528 nm to 1605 nm, with 20 mW output power. Figure 12 shows the product
and its features.
(a) 3D MEMS switching(b) Beam steering using a two-axis mirror(c) Fabricated MEMS mirror array
Table 2 Tunable laser summary
17
Figure 12 Nortel LCW508ET Tunable DFB laser – 8 channel [15]
5.4 Tunable Filter
Tunable Filter can filter the input frequency. Table 3 summarize the features of tunable
filter. Figure 13 shows the JDS Uniphase polarization independent tunable bandpass filter—TB4
series. Table 3 Tunable Filter summary
18
Figure 13 JDS Uniphase Polarization Independent tunable Bandpass filters – TB4 series[11]
5.5 Wavelength Converter
Wavelength Converter converts radiation at one wavelength to radiation at another
wavelength. Traditional product is O/E/O wavalength converter. The new generation is All-
optical wavelength converter. Table 4 shows the Optovation™ AOWC All Optical Wavelength
Converter features and applications.
Table 4 Optovation™ AOWC All Optical Wavelength Converter Features[16]
5.6 Optical Amplifier
Optical Amplifier is a device that amplifies an optical signal directly, without the need to
convert it to an electrical signal, amplify it electrically, and reconvert it to an optical signal. There
are several kinds of Optical Amplifier:
Erbium Doped Fiber Amplifier (EDFA)
Praseodymium Doped Fluoride Amplifier (PDFA)
Telluride Based Erbium Doped Optical Amplifier
Semiconductors Optical Amplifier (SOA)
Raman Amplifier
Application: Wavelength conversion Relieve wavelength blocking Dynamic provisioning/lambda management Bit rate/ protocol transparent regeneration Optical Cross Connects Optical Add Drop Muliplexeers
19
Planar Waveguide Optical Amplifier
Among these OA, EDFA and SOA are the most widely used OA.
5.6.1 Erbium Doped Fiber Amplifier (EDFA)
EDFA is working around the 1550 nm window. It is transparent to modulation format and
is extremely low polarization sensitivity. EDFA can get high gain (50 dB) over 80 nm wide
bandwidth, and low noise. The disadvantage is the bad gain flatness. Figure 14 shows the
principle of EDFA.
Figure 14 EDFA Principle
Figure 15 shows the Nortel MGMFL-1AWC28 Multiwavelength Gain Module EDFA
product and features.
20
Figure 15 Nortel MGMFL-1AWC28 Multiwavelength Gain Module EDFA product and features[15]
5.6.2 Semiconductor Optical Amplifier (SOA)
SOA is working at both 1330 nm and 1550 nm windows. It is small and compact. It can be
integrated with other devices. It has flat gain. The disadvantage is that it cannot do multiple
wavelength amplification. Figure 16 shows SOA scheme and Table 5 shows typical SOA
characteristics [9][14].
21
Figure 16 SOA Scheme
Table 5 Typical SOA Characteristics
5.7 Optical Cross Connect (OXC)
As we mention earlier, MEMS-based OXC is in research stage. There is no commercial
product available. Other OXC is not suitable for Optical Switching Router.
5.8 Tunable Optical Add-Drop Multiplexer (TOADM)
TOADM is a flexible optical component. Figure 17 shows cascade Add/Drop can add or
drop multiple channels simultaneously. Figure 18 shows lambda Crossing™ LambdaFlow
Tunable OADM [13].
22
Figure 17 Multiple OADM
Figure 18 Lambda Crossing™ LambdaFlow Tunable OADM [13]
6. Optical Switching Router Design
GMPLS network has two types of Optical Switching Routers:
Label Switching Router (LSR): LSR interacts and links with other LSRs
Label Edge Router (LER): LER serves as the “interface” between the LSR and the legacy
networks such as ATM, SONET and Ethernet.
Optical Switching Router Design has two parts:
Label Switching Router Forwarding Plane (LSR-FP) Design
Label Switching Router Control Plane Design
This methodology is consistent with the IETF GMPLS standard draft.
The LSR Forwarding Plane needs to perform:
LambdaFlow is a 40 channel tunable OADM with 4 Add/Drop ports. The OADM is tunable over the C band and is capable of adding and dropping data at a rate of 10 Gbps.
23
— Data Routing t oappropriate ports (data forwarding)
— Channel add/drop to label Edge Router
— Label Swapping
Figure 19 shows the architecture of a LSR.
Figure 19 Architecture of LSR
6.1 LSR Forwarding Plane Design #1
Figure 20 shows LSR Forwarding Plane Design #1. Figure 21 and 22 shows the working
principle of Design #1.
Figure 20 LSR Forwarding Plane Design #1
24
Figure 21 Design #1 Working Principle A
In working principle A, LSR #1 comprises of an array of demultiplexers, label swappers,
optical crossconnects, optical amplifiers and multiplexers. Demux separates incoming N from 1
port into individual . Label swapper will swap the label based on the instruction from control
plane. In the side view example, the red label green label, black purple, green black, and
cyan remains.
In working plane B, the cross connect redirects the wavelength into appropriate output
ports. The multiplexers group the signals from multiple layers of cross connects. There is one
input port and output ports that adds and drops from the LER.
Figure 22 Design #1 Working Principle B
25
The advantages of Design #1 are:
–Fully connected
–Suitable for backbone
–For mesh connection
–Multiple input ports and multiple output ports
The disadvantages are:
–Expensive
–Require a lot of components
6.2 LSR Forwarding Plane Design #2
Figure 23 LSR Forwarding Plane Design #2
Figure 24 Design # 2 Working Principle
Figure 23 and 24 show the LSR Forwarding Plane Design #2 and its working principle.
26
The advantages of Design #2 are:
–Cheaper and simpler
–For Ring Networks
–Suitable for metro or smaller networks
–Lower Insertion loss
The disadvantages of Design #2 are:
–Only 2 Nl input and output ports
–Not as flexible
–Extra add/drop switches are need if the number of wavelengths is increased.
6.3 LSR Control Plane Design
The proposed LSR-CP has to perform the following in order to set up the LSP routing and
resource table:
–Wavelength Assignment & Routing Management at each link.
–Traffic Engineering to set up the LSP (Protocol & Algorithm used: OSPF & RSVP)
–Link Management between LSRs
The incoming data has to check its label against the routing table to determine the next
destination hop. Hence, our first proposed optical processing is to perform table lookup. Figure
25 shows the structure of LSR Control Plane Design.
Figure 25 LSR Control Plane Design
27
7. Conclusion
In this project, optical communication technology is reviewed. All-Optical Network,
DWDM, GMPLS and optical switching technology are discussed. The optical components
features and the characteristics are studied. Based on these information, the Optical Switching
Router Design draft are proposed.
Reference
[1] B. E. A. Saleh, and M. C. Teich, Fundamentals of Photonics, John Wiley & Sons Inc., 1991.[2] L. Kazovsky, S. Benedetto, and A. Willner, Optical Fiber Communication Systems, Artech House Inc.,
1996.[3] http://commsci.usc.edu/Willner.NSF/pdf/peter-kaiser-technology-roadmap.pdf[4] A. S. Tanenbaum, Computer Networks, Prentice Hall PTR, 1996.[5] R. Ramaswami, K. N. Sivarajan, Optical Networks: A Practical Perspective, Morgan Kaufmann
Publishers, 1998.[6] Nortal Networks Tutorials on WDM, CD version.[7] R.Martinez, P.Y.Choo, “ECE678 Class LectureNotes”, http://www.ece.arizona.edu/~ece678[8] P.B.Chu, et., “MEMS: The Path to Large Optical Crossconnects”, IEEE Commu. Mag., Mar.2002, pp.
80-87.[9] “Overview of Optical Amplifiers:Technology and Systems”,
http://www.gii.co.jp/english/gi4433_mn_optical_amplifiers.html[10] J. Hsu, “DWDM/Fiber Optic Technology”, http://jhsu.www3.50megs.com/tech-dwdm.html[11] “Optical Amplificatioin”, JDS Unifaphse,
http://www.jdsu.com/Presentations/Jennifer_Aspell_Optical_Amplification.pdf [12] “Kailight Photonics All-Optical Wavelength Converter”, http://www.kailight.com/[13] “LambdaFlow – Tunable Optical Add Drop Multiplexer (OADM) “,
http://www.lambdax.com/pages/LambdaFlow.asp[14] T. Kelly, I Andonovic, et., “Role of semiconductor optical amplifiers in advanced networking”,
http://lw.pennnet.com/Articles/Article_Display.cfm?Section=Articles&Subsection=Display&ARTICLE_I D=94177
[15] Nortel Optical Components Datasheets, http://www126.nortelnetworks.com/datasheets/
28
[16] Optovation Product Fact Sheet, http://www.optovation.com/pdf/OPM3D.pdf[17] E. Rosen, A. Viswanathan, R. Callon, “Multiprotocol Label Switching Architecture”, Request for
Comments 3031, Network Working Group, January 2001.
29