Jodhpur XV
DETAILED PROJECT REPORTDETAILED PROJECT REPORTDETAILED PROJECT REPORTDETAILED PROJECT REPORT NAME OF WATERSHED : LAVERA KALAN (JODHPUR XV) MACRO/MICRO WATERSHED No. : 15/8,9; 16/1,2,3,4,5,6,7 GRAM PANCHAYAT : LAVERA KALAN, NANDIA KALAN PROJECT AREA : 3108 Ha. PROJECT COST : 466.2 Lakh
-: SUBMITTED BY :-
ASSISTANT ENGINEER PROJECT IMPLEMENTING AGENCY
PANCHAYAT SAMITI - BAORI (JODHPUR)
Jodhpur XV
INDEX
PARTICULARS PAGE No.
CHAPTER - 1 Introduction
1.1 Introduction
1.2 Philosophy of Integrated watershed management Pragramme
1.3 Objectives of IWMP
1.4 Need of Watershed Development Programme
1.5 Criteria and weightage for selection of Watershed
Table No. 1 Criteria and weightage for selection of watershed
Table No. 1.1 Weightage of the watershed
1.6 Project Background
Table No. 2 Basic Project Information
Table No. 3 Watershed information
CHAPTER - 2 Project Implementing Agency
2.1 Project Implementing Agency
Table No. 4 Detail of PIA
Table No. 5 Staff at PIA level
2.1.1 Role and responsibility of WDT
Jodhpur XV
2.1.2 SWOT analysis of PIA
CHAPTER - 3 Basic Information of Watershed
3.1 Geography and Geo-hydrology
3.1.1 Land use pattern
Table No. 6 Land use pattern
3.1.2 Soil and topography
Table No. 7 Soil type and topography
Table No. 8 Flood and drought condition
Table No. 9 Climatic conditions
Table No. 10 Physiography and relief
Table No. 11 Slope detail of watershed
Table No. 12 Erosion status in project area
3.1.3 Land and Agriculture
Table No. 13 Land ownership details
Table No. 14 Land use & land classification
Table No. 15 Agriculture
Table No. 16 Crop details
Table No. 17 Crop production
3.1.4 Livestock
Table No. 18 Livestock
Table No. 19 Milk Production
Table No. 20 Drinking water
3.2 Socio-Economic Profile
3.2.1 Demographic Status
Jodhpur XV
Table No. 21 Demographic information
Table No. 22 Literacy rate
Table No. 23 Poverty
3.2.2 Migration Pattern
Table No. 24 Migration details
Table No. 25 Village infrastructure
Table No. 26 Facilities / HH assets
CHAPTER - 4 Watershed Activities
4.1 Scientific Planning
Table No. 27 Details of Scientific planning and Inputs in the project
4.2 Watershed Development Approach and Strategy
4.2.1 Social Strategy
4.2.2 Technical Strategy
4.3 Institution building
4.3.1 Watershed Committee (WC)
Table No. 28 Watershed Committee Bavdi Kalan
Table No. 29 Bank account
4.3.2 Self Help Group
4.3.3 User Group
4.4 Physical activities to be undertake
4.4.1 Entry Point Activity (EPA)
Table No. 30 Entry Point Activity (EPA)
4.4.2 PRODUCTION MEASURES
4.4.2.1 AGRO FORESTRY
Jodhpur XV
4.4.2.2 MIXED HORTICULTURE
4.4.2.3 CROP DEMONSTRATION
4.4.2.4 ORGANIC FARMING SYSTEM/ COMPOST PITS
4.4.2.5 HOMESTEAD KITCHEN GARDENS
4.4.2.6 PASTURE DEVELOPMENT
4.4.2.7 FENCING
4.4.2.8 DITCH CUM BUND (DCB)
4.4.3 CONSERVATION MEASURES
4.4.3.1 CONTOUR CULTIVATION
4.4.3.2 CONTOUR BUND/ CONTOUR VEGETATIVE HEDGE
4.4.3.3 V DITCH
4.4.3.4 STAGGERED TRENCHES
4.4.3.5 WATER HARVESTING STRUCTURE (TANKA)
4.4.3.6 LOOSE STONE CHECK DAM
4.4.3.7 EARTHEN DAM
4.4.3.8 DUG OUT POND (NADI)
4.4.3.9 MASONRY CHECK DAM
CHAPTER - 5 Proposed Development Plan
CHAPTER - 6 Activity wise Abstract of Cost
CHAPTER - 7 Technical Design & Estimates
CHAPTER - 8 Project Outcomes
CHAPTER - 9 Annexure
Jodhpur XV
CHAPTER - 1
IIIIIIIINNNNNNNNTTTTTTTTRRRRRRRROOOOOOOODDDDDDDDUUUUUUUUCCCCCCCCTTTTTTTTIIIIIIIIOOOOOOOONNNNNNNN
Jodhpur XV
1.1 Introduction
In India, where a lot of water goes waste, it is important to apply the technology of watershed management
to solve its annual problems of droughts and floods. The demand for water exceeds its supply. Conflicts sharing
water resources are on the rise. Planning and development of watersheds calls for a rigorous understanding of the
occurrence and movement of water in the surface and sub-surface systems along with soil and nutrient losses in a
watershed as the need arises for a proper watershed management of that area. In a country like India, where a
lot of running water goes waste, it becomes very important to apply the technology of watershed management to
solve its annual problems of droughts and floods.
Watershed management basically involves harmonizing the use of soil and water resources between
upstream and downstream areas within a watershed toward the objectives of natural resource conservation,
increased agricultural productivity and a better standard of living for its inhabitants. Identifying and addressing the
significant externalities associated with watershed is critical for these objectives to be achieved in a sustainable
manner.
In the 1980s and 1990s, agricultural scientists and planners aimed to promote rain-fed agriculture through
watershed development. A watershed is an area from which all water drains to a common point, making it an
interesting unit for managing water and soil resources to enhance agricultural production through water
conservation
1.2 Philosophy of Integrated watershed management Pragramme
Jodhpur XV
IWM planning is a comprehensive multi-resource management planning process, involving all stakeholders
within the watershed, who together as a group, cooperatively work towards identifying the resource issues and
concerns of the watershed, as well as develop and implement a watershed plan with solutions that are
environmentally, socially and economically sustainable.
In India, the IWM efforts go back to 1970. There have been many changes in the implementation strategies
during the following years. Until 1995, watershed development projects were officially coordinated by multi-
sectoral programmes (with differing objectives) launched by the Government of India. After review in 1999 by the
Ministry of Rural Development and the Ministry of Agriculture, a common set of operational guidelines, objectives,
strategies and expenditure norms were established for watershed development programmes in 2001. These are
implemented through programmes such as DPAP (Drought-Prone Area Programme), DDP (Desert Development
Programme) and IWDP (Integrated Watershed Development Programme).
The guidelines encourage the active involvement of non-governmental organizations, semi-governmental
institutions and private enterprises, universities and training institutions. However, concerns are being raised that
emphasis in watershed development programmes is still firmly based on the belief that water is an infinite
resource, through development of groundwater abstraction and water harvesting techniques. IWM does not merely
imply the amalgamation of different activities to be undertaken within a hydrological unit. It also requires the
collation of relevant information so as to evaluate the cause and effect of all the proposed actions. The watershed
is the smallest unit where the evaluation of human-induced impacts upon natural resources becomes possible.
Therefore, although the ‘Panchayat’ remains the preferred implementation unit, the watershed should be the
evaluation unit used in assessing impacts
Jodhpur XV
1.3 Objectives of the IWMP
The main objectives of the IWMP are to restore the ecological balance by harnessing, conserving and
developing degraded natural resources such as soil, vegetative cover and water. The outcomes are prevention of
soil run-off, regeneration of natural vegetation, rain water harvesting and recharging of the ground water table.
This enables multi-cropping and the introduction of diverse agro-based activities, which help to provide sustainable
livelihoods to the people residing in the watershed area.
1.4 Need of Watershed Development Programme
Watershed Development Programme is prioritized on the basis of thirteen parameters namely Poverty Index,
Percentage of SC/ST, Actual wages, Percentage of small and marginal farmers, Ground water status, Moisture
Index, Area under rain-fed agriculture, Drinking water situation in the area, Percentage of the degraded land,
Productivity potential of the land, Contiguity of another watershed that has already developed/treated, Cluster
approach for plain or for hilly terrain
1.5 Criteria and weightage for selection of Watershed
State Remote Sensing Application Center, Jodhpur (SRSAC) has prepared "Watershed Atlas of Rajasthan ".
Watersheds have been delineated into macro / micro in each block. These have been prioritized on the basis of
two important parameters i) extent of availability of cultivable arable lands and ii) Drainage Density. Besides this
priority watershed with preponderance of resource poor, SC/ST population is given importance. Willingness of
community to participate, contribute in the programme and to take up responsibility of post project maintenance
of the created assets. Weightage given to these criteria for selection is as follows:
Jodhpur XV
Table No. 1 Criteria and weightage for selection of watershed
S.
No.
Criteria Maximum
score Ranges & scores
i Poverty index (% of
poor to population)
10 Above 80 % (10) 80 to 50 % (7.5) 50 to 20 % (5) Below 20 %
(2.5)
ii % of SC/ ST population 10 More than 40 %
(10)
20 to 40 % (5) Less than 20 %
(3)
iii Actual wages 5 Actual wages are significantly lower
than minimum wages (5)
Actual wages are equal to or
higher than minimum wages
(0)
iv % of small and
marginal farmers
10 More than 80 %
(10)
50 to 80 % (5) Less than 50 %
(3)
v Ground water status 5 Over exploited (5) Critical (3) Sub critical (2) Safe (0)
vi Moisture index/
DPAP/ DDP Block
15 -66.7 & below
(15) DDP Block
-33.3 to -66.6
(10) DPAP Block
0 to -33.2 (0)
Non DPAP/ DDP Block
vii Area under rain-fed
agriculture
15 More than 90 %
(15)
80 to 90 % (10) 70 to 80% (5) Above 70 %
(Reject)
viii Drinking water 10 No source (10) Problematic
village (7.5)
Partially covered
(5)
Fully covered
(0)
ix Degraded land 15 High – above 20 % (15)
Medium – 10 to 20 % (10)
Low- less than 10 % of TGA (5)
x Productivity potential of the land
15 Lands with low production &
where productivity
can be
Lands with moderate
production &
where
Lands with high production &
where
productivity can
Jodhpur XV
significantly
enhanced with reasonable efforts
(15)
productivity can
be enhanced with reasonable
efforts (10)
be marginally
enhanced with reasonable efforts
(5)
xi Contiguity to another
watershed that has already been
developed/ treated
10 Contiguous to
previously treated watershed &
contiguity within the micro-watersheds in the project (10)
Contiguity within
the micro-watersheds in
the project but non contiguous to previously treated
watershed (5)
Neither
contiguous to previously treated
watershed nor contiguity within the micro-watersheds in the
project (0)
xii Cluster approach in the plains (more than one
contiguous micro-watersheds in the
project)
15 Above 6 micro-watersheds in
cluster (15)
4 to 6 micro-watersheds in
cluster (10)
2 to 4 micro-watersheds in
cluster (5)
xiii Cluster approach in the hills (more than one
contiguous micro-watersheds in the
project)
15 Above 5 micro-watersheds in
cluster (15)
3 to 5 micro-watersheds in
cluster (10)
2 to 3 micro-watersheds in
cluster (5)
Total 150 150 90 41 2.5
Based on these thirteen parameters a composite ranking was given to Lavera Kalan watershed project as
given in table No. 1.1
Total number of families under BPL is 61 which are less than 50 per cent of the total households. The
percentage of SC/ST is about 34 per cent to the total population. Rain fed agriculture forms the primary
Jodhpur XV
occupation of the watershed due to the fact that ground water is very deep and there is no source of irrigation.
More than 50 per cent of the farmers are small and marginal by nature and the actual wages earned by the labour
is more than the minimum wages.
Since the rainfall received is erratic and irregular, the moisture index is low and the area is classified under
DDP block. The Lavera Kalan watershed falls in the continuity with other watersheds namely Paton ki basin, Lavera
khurd, Kherapa and Melana. Cluster approach was followed taking into consideration nine micro-watersheds
covering a total area of 3627 ha.
Table No. 1.1 Weightage of the watershed
Weightage under the criteria S.
No.
Distt Block Project
Name
No. of micro
W/s covered
Propos
ed
project
area
Type of
project
(Hilly /
Desert /
others)
Proposed
cost I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII Total
1 Jodhpur Baori Jodhpur
XV
15/8,9;
16/1,2,3,4,5,6,7
3108 Desert 466.2 5 5 0 5 5 10 15 7.5 10 10 10 10 93
1.6 Project Background
Lavera Kalan project (Jodhpur-XV) is located in Baori Panchayat Samiti, Jodhpur District of Rajasthan State.
The project is a cluster of nine micro-watersheds
Jodhpur XV
S. No. Micro-watershed No. Code Area
1 16/1 00001601 225
2 16/2 00001602 1257
3 16/3 00001603 344
4 16/4 00001604 325
5 16/5 00001605 362
6 16/6 00001606 235
7 16/7 00001607 477
8 15/8 00001508 152
9 15/9 00001509 250
The total project area of the watershed is about 3627 ha of which 3108 ha. has been undertaken to be
treated under Integrated Watershed Management Programme (IWMP) starting year 2009-10.
The nearest town is Baori which is about 24 Km from Lavera Kalan and is well connected by pucca road. The
watershed includes area of two villages namely Lavera Kalan and Hardhani. Rajput, Jat, and SC communities are
the primary inhabitants of the watershed. The livelihood of these people is primarily based on rain-fed agriculture,
animal husbandry, wage labour, cow, goat and sheep rearing. The project area falls under the Desert Prone area
according to DoLR Classification and situated at 26o 43’ N Latitude & 73o 15’ E Longitude.
Table no. 2: Basic Project Information
Jodhpur XV
Villages S.
No.
Name of
Project Name Census
Code
Area
(ha.)
Gram
Panchayats
District PIA Area
falling in
Project
(ha.)
Project
Cost
1 Lavera
Kalan
01945700 5559 Lavera Kalan Jodhpur A. En. 3108
2
Jodhpur
XV
Hardhani 01943200 2930 Nandia Kalan Jodhpur A. En. 402
466.20
lakh
Table no. 3: Watershed information
Name of the project Watershed to be treated Village Watershed type
16/1 Lavera Kalan Micro W/s
16/2 Lavera Kalan Micro W/s
16/3 Lavera Kalan Micro W/s
16/4 Lavera Kalan Micro W/s
16/5 Lavera Kalan Micro W/s
16/6 Lavera Kalan Micro W/s
16/7 Lavera Kalan Micro W/s
15/8 Lavera Kalan, Hardhani Micro W/s
Jodhpur XV
15/9 Hardhani Micro W/s
Jodhpur XV
CHAPTER – 2
PPPPPPPPRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOJJJJJJJJEEEEEEEECCCCCCCCTTTTTTTT
IIIIIIIIMMMMMMMMPPPPPPPPLLLLLLLLEEEEEEEEMMMMMMMMEEEEEEEENNNNNNNNTTTTTTTTIIIIIIIINNNNNNNNGGGGGGGG
AAAAAAAAGGGGGGGGEEEEEEEENNNNNNNNCCCCCCCCYYYYYYYY
Jodhpur XV
2.1 Project Implementing Agency
The Project Implementing Agency (PIA) is selected by State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) for Integrated
Watershed Management Programme (IWMP) in Rajasthan. The PIA for Lavera Kalan Watershed (Jodhpur XV) is
Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti Baori. The PIA is a block level nodal agency responsible for smooth
implementation of watershed project. The objectives of PIA are supervising, planning, implementing and
promoting watershed development project and related development activities as per guide lines. The PIA has
dedicated and experienced staff:
Table no. 4 : Detail of PIA
Sr.
No. Names of project Details of PIA
Designation
& Address
AEn watershed development & soil conservation
Baori (Jodhpur)
Telephone 02927265001
Fax
1 IWMP Lavera Kalan
(Jodhpur XV)
E-mail [email protected]
Jodhpur XV
Table no. : 5 Staff at PIA level
S.
No.
Name Age Sex Designation Qualification
1 Suresh Kumar Duggal 52 M Assistant Engineer B.E. (Ag)
2 Giriraj Kishor Nagla 40 M Junior Engineer B.E. (Ag) M.E. (SWC)
3 Jitendra Mathur 38 M WDT (Technical) Diploma in Civil Engg.
4 Shivdan Singh Rathore 40 M WDT (Agriculture) B.Sc. (Ag)
5 Nathuram Punia 30 M WDT (Veterinary) Diploma in Vet. Astt.
6 Kanta Chaudhary 27 F WDT (Social
Science)
B.A. (Sociology.), M.A.,
B.Ed.
2.1.1 Roles and Responsibilities of WDT
1 Assist Gram Panchayat / Gram Sabha in constitution of the Watershed Committee and their
functioning.
2 Organizing and nurturing User Groups and Self - Help Group.
3 Mobilizing women to ensure that the perspectives and interests of women are adequately reflected
in the watershed action plan.
4 Conducting the participatory base - line surveys, training and capacity building.
Jodhpur XV
5 Preparing detailed resource development plans including water and soil conservation or reclamation
etc. to promote sustainable livelihoods at household level.
6 Common property resource management and equitable sharing.
7 Preparing detailed Project Report (DPR) for the consideration of Gram sabha.
8 Undertake engineering surveys, prepare engineering drawings and cost estimates for any structures
to be built
9 Monitoring, checking, assessing, and undertaking physical verification and measurements of the
work done.
10 Facilitating the development of livelihood opportunities for the landless.
11 Maintaining project accounts.
12 Arranging physical, financial and social audit of the work undertaken.
13 Setting up suitable arrangement for post-project operation, maintenance and future development of
the assets created during the project period
2.1.2 SWOT Analysis of the PIA
Strength:
1 Dedicated and experience staffs and multidisciplinary team
2 Strong linkages with national and state level institutions, agricultural universities, for
capacity building and technical guidance.
3 Scientific planning in watershed project with the help of SRSAC, Jodhpur
Jodhpur XV
4 District level monitoring, coordination & cooperation committee.
5 Well establishment of PRIs for social audits.
6 Watershed Dept. have long experience in watershed works and has won five national
productivity awards
Weakness:
1 Lack of proper supporting staff.
2 Only one permanent staff (J En WD&SC G. K. Nagla)
3 No permanent office building.
4 Unwanted political interference.
Opportunities:
1 Sustainable livelihood generation landless and asset less.
2 Improvement of socio-economic status of poor’s.
3 Awareness generation among the illiterates through IEC activities by usage of new ICT
activities.
4 Reduction of migration rate.
5 Usage of new technologies of watershed modeling and GPS for monitoring the watershed
activities.
6 Over all integrated development of rural peoples
7 Independent DWDU, PIA & Watershed committee to over all monitoring and execution of
Jodhpur XV
activities.
Threats:
(1)Lack of sustainable agriculture development.
(2)Delay of releasing project fund from the higher authority.
(3)Lack of contribution and cooperation from local peoples.
(4)Low and erratic rainfall in the project area.
(5)Low literacy rate in the project area.
Jodhpur XV
CHAPTER - 3
BBBBBBBBAAAAAAAASSSSSSSSIIIIIIIICCCCCCCC IIIIIIIINNNNNNNNFFFFFFFFOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRMMMMMMMMAAAAAAAATTTTTTTTIIIIIIIIOOOOOOOONNNNNNNN
OOOOOOOOFFFFFFFF WWWWWWWWAAAAAAAATTTTTTTTEEEEEEEERRRRRRRRSSSSSSSSHHHHHHHHEEEEEEEEDDDDDDDD
Jodhpur XV
3.1 Geography and Geo-hydrology
3.1.1 Land use pattern
The net geographical area of watershed is about 3108 ha out of which 0.0 % is forest area.
About 39 % of the total land is classified under wasteland of which 7 % is cultivable and rest is
uncultivable. About 59.7 % of land is under agriculture from which 72.77 % is under rain-fed and a
kharif crop is taken, 27 % of land is irrigated by tube wells.
Table no. : 6 Land use pattern
Wasteland S.
No.
Name of
watershed
Geographical
area
Forest
area
(ha)
Land under
agri. Use
(ha)
Rain-fed
area
(ha)
Permanent
pasture
Cultivable
(ha)
Non
cultivable
(ha)
1 Lavera
Kalan IWMP
Jodhpur XV
3108 0.00 1855 1350 52 90 1111
3.1.2 Soil and topography
Lavera Kalan watershed project (Jodhpur XV) falls under North West Rajasthan Agro Climatic
Zone. The soil is mainly sandy loam and. The soil is brown to very dark grayish brown in surface
colour. The depth of soil is moderate to deep about 25 to 75 cm. The predominant texture of soil is
Jodhpur XV
loamy sand and silt and clay. The soil fertility is very poor with low nitrogen, phosphorus and
potash. The soil falls in Aridsol and Inseptisols order. The topography of the area is moderate
ranging from 0-10% slope
Table no. : 7 Soil type and topography
Major soil types S.
No.
Name of Agro-
climatic zone
covers w/s area
Area in
ha
Name of villages
Type Area
Topography
1 I A 2706 Lavera Kalan Sandy to
Loamy sand
2706 Moderate
slope
2 I A 402 Hardhani Sandy to
Loamy sand
402 Moderate
slope
Table no. : 8 Flood and drought condition
S. No. Village Flood (Incidence) Drought (Incidence)
1 Lavera Kalan Nil Once in three year
2 Hardhani Nil Once in three year
Jodhpur XV
Jodhpur XV
Table no. : 9 Climatic conditions
Temperature (degree centigrade) S.
No.
Year Rainfall (mm)
Maximum Minimum
Highest intensity of
rainfall (mm in a
day)
Annual
Rainy days
1 2010 435 44.7 6.3 121 30
2 2009 139 44.1 7.1 44 8
3 2008 270.5 43.8 5.8 43 16
4 2007 200 43.5 6.2 30 15
5 2006 205 43.0 5.9 45 17
The rainfall is scanty which has resulted in recurrent phenomenon of drought in every two to three
years. The average rainfall of this area is about 250 mm (from past five year data) with a highest intensity
of 121 mm within span of a day. This uneven distribution is leading to runoff of soil every year to the
streams resulting in silting of the village tank.
Table no. : 10 Physiography and relief
S. No. Micro w/s no
Area Highest contour level
Lowest contour
level
Level difference
Length of travel
% slope
1 16/1 225 365 306 59 3600 1.64
2 16/2 1257 369 293 76 8750 0.86
Jodhpur XV
3 16/3 344 366 307 59 3700 1.59
4 16/4 325 369 311 58 4850 1.19
5 16/5 362 335 309 26 4100 0.63
6 16/6 235 329 293 36 4260 0.84
7 16/7 477 339 292 47 4120 1.14
8 15/8 152 339 301 38 1955 1.94
9 15/9 250 318 291 27 3800 0.71
Table no. : 11 Slope Detail of watershed
S. No. Slope % Area
1 0-1 % 550
2 1-3 % 1407
3 3-5 % 980
4 5-10 % 540
5 10-15 % 120
6 15-35 % 30
Total 3627
Jodhpur XV
Table no.: 12 Erosion status in project Area
Cause Type of erosion
Water erosion
Area affected (ha) Run off(mm/
year)
Average soil loss
(Tonnes/ ha/ year)
a Sheet 1114 300 4112
b Rill 232 300 4230
c Gully 207 300 4860
Sub-Total 13202
Wind erosion 780 NA 240
Total for project 13442
Project Area is affected by water erosion & wind erosion both, such that loss of soil fertility takes
place every year. Production depleting year by year. It is major problem of watershed
3.1.3 Land and Agriculture
Lack of surface water source and very deep ground water has limited the sufficient base for irrigation
as well as drinking purpose. The average land holding is about 3.75 ha ranging from 1 to 20 ha. Lack of
irrigation source forces the majority of the farmers to migrate to ensure their livelihood. This affects
directly the demographic profile of the watershed. The major crops cultivated by the farmers are Bajra
(Pearl millet). Some of the farmers have Tube well as source of irrigation and take up Rabi crop also. The
Jodhpur XV
soil and moisture conservation measures such as earthen bunds and farm bunds in the area will help them
to take up rabi crop of Arandi and cumin in the residual moisture.
Table no. : 13 Land ownership details
Total owned land (ha)
Gen OBC SC ST
S. No. Village
No. Area No. Area No. Area No. Area
1 Lavera
Kalan
165 890 220 940 271 200 12 50
2 Hardhani 38 172 40 185 12 26 0 0
Total owned land (ha)
Type of farmer
Large Small Marginal BPL
S. No. Village
No. Area No. Area No. Area No. Area
1 Lavera
Kalan
400 1746 100 176 168 140 26 18
2 Hardhani 42 326 20 34 22 18 6 5
Jodhpur XV
Table No: 14 Land use & land classification
Arable Land
Non arable land
(community Land)
Road/
Other
total
land
Govt. Panchayat land
Irrigated
Un
Irrigated
fellow
DLT &
magra
Pastur
e
Nadi
Aagor
Habitatio
n
S.N.
Name of village Micro
no
Ha. Ha. Ha. Ha. Ha. Ha. Ha. Ha. Ha.
1 Lavera Kalan 16/1 90 55 10 60 0 5 3 2 225
2 Lavera Kalan 16/2 225 500 150 292 30 50 5 10 1257
3 Lavera Kalan 16/3 92 186 14 22 22 6 1 1 344
4 Lavera Kalan 16/4 40 112 18 132 0 21 1 1 325
5 Lavera Kalan 16/5 0 7 3 312 0 37 2 1 362
6 Lavera Kalan 16/6 58 94 13 40 0 28 1 1 235
7 Lavera Kalan 16/7 65 260 20 102 0 28 1 1 477
8 Lavera Kalan,
Hardhani 15/8 40 60 12 31 0 6 2 1 152
9 Hardhani 15/9 90 120 40 0 0 0 0 0 250
Table No: 15 Agriculture
Net sown area (ha) S. No. Village
One time Two times Three times
1 Lavera Kalan 1794 700 0
2 Hardhani 110 90 0
Jodhpur XV
Table No: 16 Crop details
Net sown area (ha.) in Kharif S.
No.
Village
Bajra Gowar Moong Moth Til Arandi
1 Lavera Kalan 680 134 124 277 48 95
2 Hardhani 50 40 30 20 10 10
Net sown area (ha.) in Rabi S. No. Village
Wheat Cumin Sarson Onion Isabgol
1 Lavera Kalan 36 97 121 32 63
2 Hardhani 8 6 5 10 6
Table No: 17 Crop production
Crop production Kg per ha. S. No.
Wheat Bajra Moong Moth Onion Arandi
1 3000 1800 400 400 24000 240
Jodhpur XV
3.1.4 Livestock
Majority of community in the watershed depends on cows and buffaloes for milk. Lack of rain reduced
the fodder availability for animals in watershed area. This leads to migration to other parts of the country
with their herds of goats and sheep. Milk production is very low and there is no dairy co operative in the
watershed.
Table No : 18 Livestock
S.
No.
Village Cow (No.) Buffalo
(No.)
Goat (No.) Sheep
(No.)
Camel
(No.)
Other
(No.)
1 Lavera Kalan 610 545 3120 3200 68 10
2 Hardhani 84 78 276 120 0 5
Table No: 19 Milk Production
Cow (ltr/annum) Buffalo (ltr/annum) Goat (ltr/annum) Total (ltr/annum) S. No. Village
No. Milk No. Milk No. Milk No. Milk
1 Lavera
Kalan
210 4010 187 5170 1206 3200 1603 12380
2 Hardhani 26 510 23 640 85 265 134 1415
Jodhpur XV
Table No: 20 Drinking water
S. No. Village Ground water
table (Ft.)
Source of
drinking water
Availability in
months
Quality
1 Lavera Kalan 600 Tube well 12 Slightly Saline
2 Hardhani 700 Tube well 12 Slightly Saline
3.2 Socio-Economic Profile
3.2.1 Demographic Status
Lavera Kalan watershed project has a total of 736 households with a population of 4739 (as per
base-line survey) out of which 2443 are male and 2296 female .The sex ratio is 94 female to 1000 male.
There are 59 BPL families. The average family size is 5. The literacy rate is very low i.e. 25 per cent; male
literacy rate is 38 per cent (of total male population) and female literacy rate is as low as 10.5 per cent (of
total female population). It is noticeable that only five persons have reached up to graduation standard.
The major castes in the watershed are Rajput, Jat, Devasi and Schedule Caste. Majority of population is
involved in agriculture and animal husbandry.
Jodhpur XV
Table No: 21 Demographic information
Population SC / ST population S. No. Village
Male Female Total Male Female Total
1 Lavera Kalan 2213 2116 4329 763 712 1475
2 Hardhani 1005 881 1886 134 112 246
Table No: 22 Literacy rate
Literacy S. No. Village
Total % Male % Female %
1 Lavera Kalan 1150 26.6 902 40.8 248 11.6
2 Hardhani 550 29.1 437 43.48 113 12.8
Table No: 23 Poverty
S.
No.
Village Total
household
Total BPL
HH
% of BPL
HH
Landless HH % of Land
less HH
1 Lavera Kalan 668 55 8.2 28 4.2
2 Hardhani 68 6 5.9 5 7.4
Jodhpur XV
3.2.2 Migration Pattern
People migrate during summer season to different parts of state and country like Jodhpur,
Bangalore, Mumbai and Pune as daily wagers and construction workers. Lack of irrigation facility,
employment and fodder availability force these people to migrate to other places.
Table No: 24 Migration details
Migration Migration by months S.
No.
Village Total
Population Total Male Female Up to 3
months
3-6
months
>6
months
Income
during
migration
1 Lavera Kalan 4329 350 330 20 200 100 50 3000
2 Hardhani 1886 65 60 5 30 25 5 3000
Table No: 25 Village infrastructures
S.
No.
Village Pucca
road to
village
Schools Aangan
wadi
Post office Milk
collection
centre
PHED
tube well
PHC
1 Lavera Kalan Yes 6 3 1 0 4 1
2 Hardhani Yes 2 1 0 0 1 0
Jodhpur XV
Table No: 26 Facilities / HH assets
S.
No.
Village HHs with
electricity
HHs with
safety
latrines
HHs with
phones
HHs with
vehicle
HHs
with
TV set
HHs
with
LPG
gas
HHs
with
fridge
HHs
with
Tube
Well
1 Lavera Kalan 480 45 450 240 85 42 17 117
2 Hardhani 35 8 28 10 6 3 3 11
The Lavera Kalan watershed comes under arid zone. So farmers grow crop according to the rainfall. If
they get good rainfall they generally grow high value crops like mustard, cumin, Cotton, Moong etc. In case
of low rainfall they go for Bajra. So we can say that monsoon decides cropping patterns of Lavera Kalan
watershed.
The Lavera Kalan watershed area has low productivity because of the following
reasons:-
i) Full dependence on monsoon
Lavera Kalan watershed is dependent on monsoon. Water is essential input in agriculture. Due to the
absence of proper irrigation facility, most of the cultivated area depends on the uncertain monsoon.
Therefore, the success or failure of the monsoon determines the success or failure of agriculture
production. The rainfall is unreliable due to two factors: untimely and inadequate
ii) Low use of fertilizer per unit cropped area
Jodhpur XV
Farmers do not use sufficient fertilizer due to lack of water, scarcity of fertilizer in market and
insufficient money for fertilizer. Many a times they don’t get fertilizer at the right time.
iii) Traditional farming methods
This also leads to low productivity. There is a lot of ignorance about the use of new farming
methods and technologies such as multiple cropping. They don’t use FYM and other input in a proper
way that is why they don’t get 100% output. So these factors contribute to low productivity.
iv) Lack of adequate farm machinery
Even today a large number of farmers in Lavera Kalan watershed use traditional methods of ploughing
and irrigation. They don’t have adequate machinery like seed drill, Combine harvester etc. So, old
machineries take more time in tillage practices
iv) Lack of good quality seeds and fertilizers:
Good quality seed, fertilizer and pesticide are important factor in agriculture productivity. The
use of good quality leads to higher land productivity. In Lavera Kalan, however, there are two
limitations in the use of fertilizer. First these fertilizers are most useful in irrigated condition. But in Lavera
Kalan most of the land depends on rainfall, mostly farmers use nitrogenous fertilizers especially urea.
This has resulted in disproportionate use of fertilizer depleting the quality of land
v) Lack of other facilities such as storage and marketing
5-10% of agriculture product damage after harvesting due to scarcity of proper storage and proper
market for sale. So he sells to local traders at the low prices. Farmers mainly face proper means of
transportation and roads. and second problem is farmers don’t have proper storage facilities.
Jodhpur XV
Jodhpur XV
CHAPTER - 4
WWWWWWWWAAAAAAAATTTTTTTTEEEEEEEERRRRRRRRSSSSSSSSHHHHHHHHEEEEEEEEDDDDDDDD
AAAAAAAACCCCCCCCTTTTTTTTIIIIIIIIVVVVVVVVIIIIIIIITTTTTTTTIIIIIIIIEEEEEEEESSSSSSSS
Jodhpur XV
Watershed Activities
Watershed management as a strategy has been adopted by Government of India especially in the rain-fed
regions of semi-arid tropics. These regions are characterized by low and undependable rain, low soil fertility, poor
infrastructure development, low literacy and high incidence of migration. Several studies have identified that there
is a dire need of a systematic and scientific approach to deal with watershed development. The common
guidelines generate a fresh and flexible framework for the next generation watershed development.
4.1 Scientific Planning
(i) Cluster Approach
This envisages a broader vision of Geo-hydrological unit which involves treating a cluster of micro-
watershed. The Lavera Kalan watershed project consists of nine micro-watersheds namely 16/1,2,3,4,5,6,7 ;
15/8,9. Further Lavera Kalan watershed project is in continuation with other watersheds namely Nandia khurd-II
(Hariyali I), Chatalia (Hariyali IV), Kherapa (DDP IV) and Lavera kalan (Hariyali IV) projects, this gives an element
of continuation of the programme.
(ii) Base line survey
To access the impact of any watershed development programme a detailed base line survey has to be
conducted. This acts a benchmark for any intervention during and post implementation of any development
programme. A detailed base line survey was undertaken by WDT which involved household census survey, Bio-
physical survey and village level data collection. Household census survey includes a detailed questionnaire which
was filled by visiting each and every household in the villages. This gave in the details of the demographic profile
Jodhpur XV
of the village, the literacy percentage, SC/ST population, number of BPL household, cattle population, and net
consumption rate in the village, average milk production of the cattle and various schemes running and their
benefits.
Bio-physical survey was undertaken to identify various natural resources available in the villages. It included
the soil typology, well in the area, crop taken in the field, cropping pattern, fertilizer used and various sources of
irrigation in the field.
(iii) Participatory Rural Approach (PRA)
The past experience of watershed has given tremendous input to focus on creating accountability of the
stakeholders towards the programme. This has created an emphasis to include all the stakeholder communities
and their local indigenous technological knowledge while planning for any activity. Participatory Rural Approach
provides a new path for planning, implementing, monitoring and post-withdrawal activities with a complete
accountability of the stakeholders. Various PRA techniques like resource mapping, social mapping and season
calendars were used to understand the physical and social orientation of the village in general and the watershed
in specific. Various tools like matrix ranking, Venn Diagram were used to identify various local vegetations, fodder
crops, various institution and their significance in the life of farmers.
(iv) Use of GIS and Remote sensing for planning
Use of various high science tools has been promoted at various stages of watershed development.
(A) Prioritization
Geographical Information System (GIS) has been used for prioritization process. Various parameters were taken
into account like Geo-morphological, Soil, BPL population, Ground water status, Drinking water situation and Slope
percent. These were all given proper weightage according to the DoLR specification. This helped in prioritization of
Jodhpur XV
various watershed area.
(B) Planning
State Remote Sensing Application Centre has provided various maps like slope map, contour map, Land use land
cover map, Satellite image maps were used to identify each and every water conservation structures available in
the project area. Contour map of vertical interval of 1 meter at a scale of 1:10000 was used for identifying various
locations for soil and water conservation structures.
(C) Topographical survey of DLT
There is a good drainage line in the watershed, so for treatment of drainage line a topographical survey was
essential. This help in selection of site for LSCD, Nallah bunding and Masonry check dams.
Table No. 27 Details of Scientific planning and Inputs in the project
S. No. Scientific criteria / inputs used Whether Scientific
criteria used
1 A. Planning
a. Cluster approach Yes
b. Whether technical back-stopping for the project has been arranged?
If yes, mention the name of the institute
c. Baseline survey Yes
d. Hydro-geological survey Yes
e. Contour mapping Yes
f. Participatory Rural Approach (PRA) Yes
Jodhpur XV
g. Remote sensing data Yes
h. Ridge to valley treatment planning Yes
i. Online IT connectivity between -
(1) Project and DRDA cell / ZP Yes
(2) DRDA and SLNA Yes
(3) SLNA and DoLR Yes
j. Availability of GIS layers -
(1) Cadastral map
(2) Village boundaries Yes
(3) Drainage Yes
(4) Slope map Yes
(5) Land use Yes
(6) Ground water status No
(7) Watershed boundaries Yes
2 Inputs
(1) Bio- pesticides No
(2) Organic manure Yes
(3) Vermi-compost Yes
(4) Bio-fertilizer No
(5) Water saving devices Yes
Jodhpur XV
(6) Mechanized tools / Implements Yes
(7) Bio-fencing Yes
(8) Automatic water level recorders & sediment samplers No
4.2 Watershed Development Approach and Strategy
The developmental strategy is two pronged- technical and social, both integrated for sustainable development
of natural resources. Social strategy is for creating awareness and capacity building of community for self-
motivation and long term commitment to the project for its sustainability. Technical strategy is for planning
designing & implementation of activities for development of natural resources
4.2.1 Social Strategy
• Participatory Approach for empowerment of Community: People’s participation is the key to sustainable
watershed development programmes.
• Demand Driven Project Proposals of the community and Flexibility in choice of Technology.
• Equity for Resource Poor and Women: In all watershed development projects thrust is on improving equity
by addressing needs of all sections of community
• Social Audit
• Linkages of Watershed community with Panchayat Raj Institutions: An important element of long term
sustainability is to forge linkages with permanent institutions in the area. So, linkages are forged between
the Panchayats and the watershed communities.
Jodhpur XV
4.2.2 Technical Strategy
• Ridge to Valley approach
• In-situ moisture conservation
• Reduce Runoff velocity
• Rain Water harvesting with the approach of ‘Water Budgeting
• Alternate land use i. e. Horticulture, Agro forestry, Pasture development & forestry plantation based on
land capability classification.
• Flexibility in choice of Technology: Taking account of the high degree of heterogeneity in the socio
economic and agro ecological conditions in rain fed areas, a high degree of flexibility is provided in the
choice of appropriate, at the watershed level
• Low cost, replicable & indigenous technologies
4.2.3 Water Budgeting
Strange’s table is used to calculate the total yield from watershed
Strange's Table
Yield from 1 hectare of Natural (Untreated) catchment
Good Catchment Average Catchment Bad Catchment Total
Monsoon
rainfall in mm
% of utilisable
rain water
Utilisable rain water
(Cum)
% of utilisable
rain water
Utilisable rain water
(Cum)
% of utilisable
rain water
Utilisable rain water
(Cum)
20 0.08 0.16 0.06 0.12 0.04 0.08
Jodhpur XV
40 0.13 0.52 0.0975 0.39 0.065 0.26
60 0.245 1.47 0.1735 1.041 0.1225 0.735
80 0.41 3.28 0.3075 2.46 0.205 1.64
100 0.7 7 0.525 5.25 0.35 3.5
120 0.9 10.8 0.675 8.1 0.45 5.4
140 1.1225 15.715 0.91875 12.8625 0.6125 8.575
160 1.625 26 1.21875 19.5 0.8125 13
180 2.12 38.16 1.59 28.62 1.06 19.08
200 2.7 54 2.025 40.5 1.35 27
220 3.26 71.72 2.445 53.79 1.63 35.86
240 3.81 91.44 2.8575 68.58 1.905 45.72
260 4.45 115.7 3.3375 86.775 2.225 57.85
280 5.19 145.32 3.3925 94.99 2.595 72.66
300 5.9 177 4.425 132.75 2.95 88.5
320 6.72 215.04 5.04 161.28 3.36 107.52
340 7.75 263.5 5.6775 193.035 3.785 128.69
360 8.55 307.8 6.4125 230.85 4.275 153.9
380 9.45 359.1 7.0876 269.3288 4.725 179.55
400 10.25 410 7.6875 307.5 5.125 205
420 11.05 464.1 8.2875 348.075 5.525 232.05
440 12 528 9 396 6 264
460 12.95 595.7 7.7125 354.775 6.475 297.85
480 13.9 667.2 10.425 500.4 6.95 333.6
500 14.7 735 11.025 551.25 7.35 367.5
520 15.5 806 11.625 604.5 7.75 403
540 16.36 883.44 12.2625 662.175 8.175 441.45
560 17.2 963.2 12.9 722.4 8.6 481.6
580 18 1044 13.5 783 9 522
600 19 1140 14.25 855 9.5 570
Jodhpur XV
Good catchment - Hills or plains with little cultivation and moderately absorbant soil Average catchment - Flat partly cultivated stiff gravely sandy absorbant soil Bad catchment - Flat and cultivated sandy soil
Table No. 28 Total available water
Micro w/s
no.
Area ha.
Type of catchment
Utilisable rain water/ ha (Cu.m.)
Utilisable rain water from micro w/s
(Cu.m.)
16/1 225 Average 132.75 29868.75
16/2 1257 Average 132.75 166866.75
16/3 344 Average 132.75 45666
16/4 325 Average 132.75 43143.75
16/5 362 Average 132.75 48055.5
16/6 235 Average 132.75 31196.25
16/7 477 Average 132.75 63321.75
15/8 152 Good 177 26904
15/9 250 Good 177 44250
Total 499272.75
Table No. 29 Water tapped in existing structure
S.No. Name No. Storage Capacity (Cu.m.)
i) Major Irrigation Project 0 0
ii) Medium Irrigation Project 0 0
Jodhpur XV
iii) Form Ponds/Tanks 103 116000
iv) Anicuts 3 43000
Total 159000
Table No. 30 Balance available water
Total yield (Cu.m.) Net tapped water
(Cu.m.)
Balance
water
(Cu.m.)
Available for Harvesting
75% (Cu.m.)
1 2 (2-1) 0.75*3
499272.75 159000 340272.75 255204.5
The water budgeting indicates potential for water harvesting in the area. Loose stone check dam, Masonry check
dam, Contour bunding, Dug out pond, Nallah bunding and water harvesting structure in arable land (Tanka) etc.
activities could be done.
Table No. 30a Activities planned for water harvesting
Activity No. Storage capacity per No.
(Cu.m.)
Total water to be
harvested (Cu.m.)
Tanka 70 25 1750
Anicut 12 4500 54000
LSCD 370 200 74000
Bunding 600 80 48000
Jodhpur XV
Dug out pond 20 490 9800
Nalla bund 46 10 460
PD 20 1770 35400
Total 223410
4.3 Institution building
4.3.1 Watershed Committee (WC)
Watershed committee is constituted by Gram Sabha to implement the watershed project with
technical support of WDT. The committee is registered under society registration act 1860. The Gram Sabha
of the Gram Panchayat select the chairman of the watershed committee with the secretary who will be a
paid functionary. In Lavera Kalan watershed two watershed committee were formed namely Lavera Kalan
w/s committee of Lavera kalan gram panchayat and Nandia kalan w/s committee of Nandia kalan gram
panchayat. Since the watershed covers area of two gram panchayat so separate watershed committee were
constituted.
Table No. 31 Watershed Committee Lavera Kalan
S. No. Name Designation Sex Category Educational
Qualification
1 Poona ram S/o Ghamanda ram President M OBC Graduate
2 Ganpat ram S/o Naru ram Secretary M OBC Secondry
3 Govind singh S/o Man singh Member M Gen Literate
Jodhpur XV
4 Hanuman singh S/o Hari singh Member M Gen Literate
5 Kesharam S/o Bhura ram Member M OC Literate
6 Jetharam S/o Manga ram Member M OBC Literate
7 Jagram S/o Biramram Member M SC Literate
8 Smt. Gomti W/o Premaram Member F SC Literate
9 Smt. Sumitra W/o Babu ram Member F SC Literate
10 Smt. Sua W/o Gokul ram Member F SC Literate
11 Smt. Santosh W/o Omaram Member F SC Literate
12 Dalu ram S/o Madaram Member M OBC Middle
Table No. 32 Watershed Committee Nandia kalan
S. No. Name Designation Sex Category Educational
Qualification
1 Sattu ram S/O Deraj Ram President M OBC Graduate
2 Babu ram S/O Ghamanda ram Secretary M OBC Secondry
3 Jassa ram S/o Kheta ram Member M OBC Literate
4 Gordhan S/o Kishna ram Member M OBC Literate
Jodhpur XV
5 Smt. Sharda W/o Aadu ram Member F OBC Literate
6 Karna ram S/o Rupa ram Member M OBC Literate
7 Smt. Pappudi W/o Purkha ram Member F ST Literate
8 Sohan singh S/o Vijay singh Member M General Literate
9 Bhagwan ram S/o Anada ram
Meghwal
Member M SC Literate
10 Girdhari ram S/o Tulchharam Member M OBC Literate
11 Smt Chhoti w/oGopalram Member M SC Literate
Details of Bank Account :
For each water shed committee, the separate saving bank account has been opened with the name of
Sarpanch, Secretary WC and WDT member (Junior Engineer). One separate Watershed Development Fund (WDF)
account will be opened for each committee. In the WDF Account no transaction will be done only the contribution
received from beneficiaries will be deposited. The details of bank account are :
Account No. S.No.
Watershed
Committee Saving A/C No. WDF A/C No.
Bank Name
1. Lavera Kalan 2826 Jaipur Thar Gramin Bank
2. Nandia Kalan 2827 Jaipur Thar Gramin Bank
Jodhpur XV
4.3.2 Self Help Group
Self Help Groups are motivated, small homogenous groups organized together through credit and
thrift activities. Self Help Group initiative especially for women help uplift their livelihood, generally Self
Help Groups include landless and poor men and women.
Before formation of the SHGs during PRA activities focused group discussion (FGDs) were held with the
women, which came up with the following observations
a) Lack of proper credit facilities due to low intervention of formal financial credit institution.
b) Excessive exploitation of weaker section by money lenders
c) Lack of attitude for saving among poor people.
d) Lack of knowledge on credit and thrift activity and banking.
Status of new SHG is shown in table no.33
4.3.3 User Group
User Groups are normally formed to manage an activity or asset created under the programme on
a long term basis. The User Group collect user charges from their members, oversee the works and
manage the benefits.
It was decided that each group would formulate certain internal rules and have a feeling of ownership
with community spirit.
Jodhpur XV
Table No. 33 Status of SHG (New)
Gram Panchayat : Lavera Kalan Village : Lavera kalan S Name of Saving Since Details of Saving account in Bank Amount Financial Details of revolving fund Training
No. SHG per when Loan activities
if any received from any agency Received
(No. of Month saving Dt.of (with date) Agency Amount Status of
Members) (Rs.) Done by Name Opening taken of Fund Repayment
Group of Bank A/c No. the A/c from Bank (Rs.)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 Kriparam ji SHG (12 member)
100 10.01.11 Co-Operative Bank Baori
3039 09.03.11
2 Ishwar SHG (12 member)
100 13.01.11 Co-Operative Bank Baori
3038 09.03.11
3 Ramdev SHG (13 member)
100 16.02.11 Co-Operative Bank Baori
3037 09.03.11
4 Ramsukh das SHG (12 member)
100 20.02.11
5 Ma Sati SHG Ma Sati SHG (14 member)
50 05.01.11
6 Shri Kaveri Momen SHG
50 25.01.11
Jodhpur XV
4.4 Physical activities to be undertaken
4.4.1 Entry Point Activity (EPA)
EPA activities are taken up under watershed project to build a rapport with the village community at
the beginning of the project, generally, certain important works which are in urgent demand of the local
community are taken up. A group discussion was conducted with watershed development committee
regarding the EPA activity. It was conveyed to the WC that an amount of Rs. 18.648 Lakh was allotted for
EPA activity, which was 4% of total allocated budget. The villagers discussed various activities which they
felt is important but after a brief discussion it was conveyed to them that only those activities can be taken
Gram Panchayat : Nandia Kalan Village : Hardhani
Details of Saving account in Bank
Details of revolving fund
received from any agency
S No.
Name of SHG (No. of
Members)
Saving per
Month (Rs.)
Since when
saving Done by
Group Name of Bank
A/c No
Dt .of Opening the A/c
Amount Loan
(with date)
taken from Bank
Financial
activities if any
Agency Amount of Fund (Rs.)
Status of Repayment
Training
Received
1 Saraswati SHG (15 member)
50 28.05.10 Co-Operative Bank Baori
2929 16.08.10
2 Gopal krishan SHG 13 member)
100 14.06.10 Co-Operative Bank Baori
2928 16.08.10
Jodhpur XV
which revive the common natural resources. It was also taken into priority that there should be an
instrument of convergence which will result in sustainability of activities.
Table No. 34 Entry Point Activity (EPA)
S.
No.
Name of WC Amount
earmarked for
EPA
Entry Point Activity planned Estimated Cost
(Lakh)
Installation of Solar light 10.4
Rain water harvesting structure (Tanka) 5.036
1 Lavera Kalan 16.236
Repairing of Rain water harvesting
structure (Tanka)
0.8
2 Nandia Kalan 2.412 Installation of Solar light 2.412
S.no Name of the Gram Panchayat Date on which Grama Sabha approved
EPA
1 Lavera Kalan 10.06.10
2 Nandia Kalan 10.06.10
Jodhpur XV
4.4.2 PRODUCTION MEASURES
4.4.2.1 AGRO FORESTRY
Suitable forestry plants like Khejri, Ardoo, Desi Babool, Neem, Kumtha etc. are planted on the field
boundaries to meet the fuel & fodder requirements of the farmer.
4.4.2.2 MIXED HORTICULTURE
Suitable horticulture plants like Mango, Lemon,
Guava, Ber, Pomegranate, Anwala etc. are grown
with the crops, to improve the income & nutrition
level of the cultivators. A water harvesting
structure (Tanka) is constructed to fulfill the water
requirement of horticulture plants
4.4.2.3 CROP DEMONSTRATION
Jodhpur XV
To show the quantitative and qualitative difference between traditional and improved practices/ inputs and
in order to motivate the farmers to adopt improved agricultural practices/ inputs recommended by the
Research Institutions/ Department of Agriculture, demonstrations are conducted in a small area of 0.5 ha.
4.4.2.4 ORGANIC FARMING SYSTEM/ COMPOST PITS
Organic manure is decomposed agricultural waste and cow dung, which is applied in the field in place of
chemical fertilizers. It is cheaper, locally available and without any kind of side effect.
4.4.2.5 HOMESTEAD KITCHEN GARDENS
Emphasis is given on developing backyard gardens to meet the day to day needs of the vegetables of the
villagers.
4.4.2.6 PASTURE DEVELOPMENT
To meet the fuel, fodder, timber requirements of the community and to increase the carrying
capacity of the degraded pastures, proper fencing, planting and over seeding of grasses like
Dhaman, Sevan, Stylohameta is done on Govt./Panchayat and Pasture lands. Conservation
measures are also adopted to conserve soil and water. Contour furrows/ trenches are excavated on
the contours and pits are dug in the trenches for plantation.
Jodhpur XV
4.4.2.7 FENCING
Fencing is necessary to protect the production measures and pastures developed on non arable lands.
The fencing is designed in such a way that it intercepts runoff and conserves rain water. Different types of
fencing are as under:
1. DITCH CUM BUND (DCB)
This is most popular method of fencing. A ditch of particular cross section considering the type of the soil is
dug around the pasture area. The aim is to prevent cattle from entering the protected area. The soil so
excavated is used for construction of a bund. It can be fortified with local species of vegetation.
2. STONE WALL FENCING
Stone wall fencing is done in area where stone is locally available especially in hilly areas. The stone
wall is constructed to prevent the cattle from entering the protected area.
4.4.3 CONSERVATION MEASURES
4.4.3.1 CONTOUR CULTIVATION
Cultivation is done along the contours. This forms the mini barriers across the flow path of the runoff,
which conserves rain water in situ & check soil erosion. Effectiveness of contour cultivation varies with
Jodhpur XV
slope, crop cover and soil. It is most effective on moderate slope ranging from 1 to 5%
4.4.3.2 CONTOUR BUND/ CONTOUR VEGETATIVE HEDGE
Contour bunds are small earthen bunds
constructed along the contour on the agriculture
lands to check soil erosion and conserve
sufficient moisture to grow crops. These bunds
are purified with locally available vegetation like
Khus, Munja, Dhaman and Stylo Hamata are
raised on the bund.
4.4.3.3 V DITCH
These are constructed parallel to contour in areas of gentle slope to conserve in sito moisture and to
check velocity of run off.
Jodhpur XV
4.4.3.4 STAGGERED TRENCHES
Number of rows of trenches are dug in hilly areas having steep slopes. Distance between two
trenches is kept equal to the length of a trench. Adjacent rows are staggered to reduce the maximum
length of runoff for better retention. These trenches check the velocity of runoff as well as conserve in-situ
moisture and check soil erosion.
4.4.3.5 WATER HARVESTING STRUCTURE (TANKA)
Tanka is a covered masonry runoff storage tank
which collects runoff water from artificial
catchment constructed around it. It is also an age
old practice in the desert areas and is used for
harvesting surface runoff water for life saving
irrigation and drinking purposes.
4.4.3.6 LOOSE STONE CHECK DAM
Jodhpur XV
These structures are constructed in small and
medium size gullies using locally available
stones/ boulders as dry masonry. A waste weir is
also provided to discharge the peak runoff safely
from the catchment.
4.4.3.7 EARTHEN DAM
These are constructed in medium to large size gullies
by making earthen embankment in the nallah bed
across the drainage line duly supported by locally
available vegetation/ grass. They are provided where
separate surplus arrangement for water is available at
site.
Jodhpur XV
4.4.3.8 DUG OUT POND (NADI)
It is a water harvesting structure constructed in
middle to large drainage lines across the flow to
store surplus runoff . The pond is constructed near
the point of use where maximum water can be
stored requiring minimum amount of earth work.
The earthen bund is fortified with vegetation and
waste weir.
4.4.3.9 MASONRY CHECK DAM
Jodhpur XV
It is a weir like masonry structure constructed
across the natural drain/ nallah which intercepts
the runoff from local catchment and stores it for
optimum utilization. This helps in recharging of
surrounding wells. The stored water can also be
used for lift or flow irrigation as well as for
drinking purposes of human and livestock
population. Due to these direct and indirect
benefits, masonry check dam is in great demand
in the rural areas.
CHAPTER - 5
PROPOSED PROPOSED PROPOSED PROPOSED
DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT
PLANPLANPLANPLAN
Name of the Project IWMP XV Name of the Project IWMP XV Name of the Project IWMP XV
G.P. Nandia Kalan G.P. Lavera Kalan G.P. 2 NO.
Block Baori Block Baori Block Baori
District. Jodhpur District. Jodhpur District. Jodhpur
Village Covered 1 NO. Village
Covered
1 NO. Village Covered 2 NO.
Project outlay 60.3 LAC Project
outlay
405.9 LAC Project outlay 466.2 LAC
Total Area 402 Hectare Total Area 2706 Hectare Total Area 3108 Hectare
No. of WC's formed 1 No. of WC's formed 1 No. of WC's formed 2
QTY. RATE Amt from
project fund
Convergenc
e fund
Total Cost Beneficiary
contribution
QTY. RATE Amt from
project
fund
Convergen
ce fund
Total Cost Beneficiary
contributio
n
QTY. Amt from
project fund
Convergenc
e fund
Total Cost Beneficiary
contribution
I. ADMINISTRATIVE COST 10% 6.03 10% 40.6 10%
SUB TOTAL 6.030 6.030 0.0 40.590 40.590 46.620 0.000 46.620 0.000
II MONITORING 1% 0.603 0.603 0.603 1% 4.1 4.059 4.059 1% 4.662 0.000 4.662 0.000
III EVALUATION 1% 0.603 0.603 0.603 1% 4.1 4.059 4.059 1% 4.662 0.000 4.662 0.000
7.236 7.236 0.0 48.708 48.708 55.944 0.000 55.944 0.000
W/S PREPARATORY PHASE 0.000 0.0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
IV ENTRY POINT ACTIVITY 4% 2.412 2.412 2.412 4% 16.2 16.236 16.236 4% 18.648 0.000 18.648 0.000
2.412 2.412 0.0 16.236 16.236 18.648 0.000 18.648 0.000
VTRAININGS & CAPACITY
BUILDING 5% 3.015 0.000 5% 20.3 0.000 0.000 5% 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
3.015 3.015 0.0 20.295 20.295 23.310 0.000 23.310 0.000
VI DETAILED PROJECT REPORT 1% 0.603 0.603 0.603 1% 4.1 4.059 4.059 1% 4.662 0.000 4.662 0.000
0.603 0.603 0.603 4.1 4.059 4.059 4.662 0.000 4.662 0.000
TOTAL 6.030 6.030 0.0 40.590 40.590 46.620 0.000 46.620 0.000
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PLAN
TOTAL
TOTAL
S. N. NAME OF ACTIVITY
GP NANDIA KALAN GP LAVERA KALAN
QTY. RATE Amt from
project fund
Convergenc
e fund
Total Cost Beneficiary
contribution
QTY. RATE Amt from
project
fund
Convergen
ce fund
Total Cost Beneficiary
contributio
n
QTY. Amt from
project fund
Convergenc
e fund
Total Cost Beneficiary
contribution
TOTAL
S. N. NAME OF ACTIVITY
GP NANDIA KALAN GP LAVERA KALAN
VII NRM 60% 60% 60% 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
1ARABLE CONSERVATION
WORK
(i) Earthen Bund 160 8100 12.960 3.240 16.200 1.296 440 8100 35.640 45.360 81.000 6.48 600 48.600 48.600 97.200 7.776
(ii) WHS (Tanka) 17 80000 13.600 13.600 27.200 2.176 43 80000 34.400 34.400 68.800 5.504 60 48.000 48.000 96.000 7.680
(iii) Waste weir 12 12000 1.440 0.960 2.400 0.192 28 12000 3.360 3.840 7.200 0.576 40 4.800 4.800 9.600 0.768
(iv)Gulley Control Structure Nallah
Bunding 2 10000 0.200 0.200 0.016 27 10000 2.700 0.000 2.700 0.216 29 2.900 0.000 2.900 0.232
(v) Farm Pond 0 50000 0.000 0.000 0 10 50000 5.000 5.000 0.4 10 5.000 0.000 5.000 0.400
2NON ARABLE CONSERVATION
WORK
(i) V Ditch for PD 0 17900 0.000 0.000 10 17900 1.790 0.000 1.790 10 1.790 0.000 1.790 0.000
(ii)Staggered Contour Trenches for
PD 0 11800 0.000 0.000 10 11800 1.180 1.180 10 1.180 0.000 1.180 0.000
(iii) Dug out Pond 2 50000 1.000 1.000 2.000 8 50000 4.000 4.000 8.000 10 5.000 5.000 10.000 0.000
(iv) WHS (Tanka) 2 80000 1.600 1.600 8 80000 6.400 6.400 10 8.000 0.000 8.000 0.000
(v) Nallah Bunding with WW 4 22000 0.880 0.880 1.760 14 22000 3.080 3.080 6.160 18 3.960 3.960 7.920 0.000
3 DRAINAGE LINE TREATMENT
(i) LSCD 'A' 3 17800 0.534 0.534 92 17800 16.376 16.376 95 16.910 0.000 16.910 0.000
(ii) LSCD 'B' 6 16500 0.990 0.990 134 16500 22.110 22.110 140 23.100 0.000 23.100 0.000
(iii) LSCD 'C' 6 15100 0.906 0.906 144 15100 21.744 21.744 150 22.650 0.000 22.650 0.000
(iv) LSCD 'D' 8 13800 1.104 1.104 142 13800 19.596 19.596 150 20.700 0.000 20.700 0.000
(v) LSCD 'E' 7 12400 0.868 0.868 143 12400 17.634 17.634 150 18.502 0.000 18.502 0.000
(vi) Masonry Check Dam 0 0 0.098 3.000 3.098 13 5 48.530 7.000 55.530 13 48.628 10.000 58.628 0.000
36.180 22.680 58.860 243.54 97.680 341.220 0 279.720 120.360 400.080 0.000
VIIIPRODUCTION SYSTEM &
MICRO ENTERPRISES 15% 9.045 15% 60.89 15%
For Arable Land
1 Arable bund 160 200 0.320 0.080 0.400 0.128 440 200 0.880 1.120 2.000 0.64 600 1.200 1.200 2.400 0.768
2 Agro Forestry 950 50 0.475 0.475 0.152 8934 50 4.467 4.467 1.42944 9884 4.942 0.000 4.942 1.581
3Horticulture Plantation with
fencing & Tanka 17 15933 2.709 3.187 5.895 1.886 43 15933 6.851 6.373 13.224 4.2318 60 9.560 9.560 19.120 6.118
4Horticulture Plantation without
fencing (Orchard) 3 10000 0.300 0.300 0.096 47 10000 4.700 4.700 1.504 50 5.000 0.000 5.000 1.600
5 Vermi Compost 3 24000 0.720 0.720 0.230 22 23890 5.040 5.040 1.6128 25 5.760 0.000 5.760 1.843
6 Crop Demonstration 30 1200 0.360 0.360 0.115 270 1200 3.240 3.240 1.0368 300 3.600 0.000 3.600 1.152
7 Homested Kitchen Gerden 15 400 0.060 0.060 0.019 85 400 0.340 0.340 0.1088 100 0.400 0.000 0.400 0.128
8 Medicinal Plants 8 1500 0.120 0.120 0.038 72 1500 1.080 1.080 0.3456 80 1.200 0.000 1.200 0.384
TOTAL
W/S WORK PHASE
QTY. RATE Amt from
project fund
Convergenc
e fund
Total Cost Beneficiary
contribution
QTY. RATE Amt from
project
fund
Convergen
ce fund
Total Cost Beneficiary
contributio
n
QTY. Amt from
project fund
Convergenc
e fund
Total Cost Beneficiary
contribution
TOTAL
S. N. NAME OF ACTIVITY
GP NANDIA KALAN GP LAVERA KALAN
For Non-arable Land
1 V Ditch for PD 0 2200 0.000 0.000 10 2200 0.220 0.220 10 0.220 0.000 0.220 0.000
2 Staggered Contour Trenches for PD 0 900 0.000 0.000 10 900 0.090 0.090 10 0.090 0.000 0.090 0.000
3 Plantation in PD 1 0 0.000 0.000 10 4.9460 4.946 10 4.946 0.000 4.946 0.000
4 Plantation in PD 2 0 0.000 0.000 10 3.4480 3.448 10 3.448 0.000 3.448 0.000
5 Fencing of PD (by SW) 0 0.000 0.000 10 0 3.527 3.527 10 3.527 0.000 3.527 0.000
6 Fencing of PD (by DCB) 0 0.000 0.000 10 0 2.681 2.681 10 2.681 0.000 2.681 0.000
1TOOLKIT, TRAINING &
REVOLVING FUND OF SHG 2.700 2.700 0 0 7.906 7.906 0 10.606 0.000 10.606 0.000
2 LIVESTOCK MANAGEMENT
(i.) Animal Health Camp 5 20000 1.000 1.000 45 20 9.000 9.000 50 10.000 0.000 10.000 0.000
(ii) Vaccination/Cattle curse 0.200 0.200 0 0 0.800 0.800 0 1.000 0.000 1.000 0.000
(iii) Purchase of Bull / Pada 0 25000 0.000 0.000 3 25000 0.750 0.750 3 0.750 0.000 0.750 0.000
(iv) A I 0.081 0.081 0 0 0.919 0.919 0 1.000 0.000 1.000 0.000
9.045 3.267 12.311 0 0.000 60.885 7.493 68.378 0 69.930 10.760 80.690 0.000
IX CONSOLIDATION PHASE 3% 1.809 1.809 0.000 1.809 3% 12.177 12.177 0.000 12.177 3% 13.986 0.000 13.986 0.000GRAND TOTAL 60.300 25.947 86.246 6.346 405.900 105.173 511.073 24.085 466.200 131.120 597.320 30.431
TOTAL
CHAPTER - 6
ACTIVITY WISE ACTIVITY WISE ACTIVITY WISE ACTIVITY WISE
ABSTRACT OF COSTABSTRACT OF COSTABSTRACT OF COSTABSTRACT OF COST
Unit RATE QTY. Amt from project
fund
Convergence fund Total Cost Beneficiary
contribution
I. ADMINISTRATIVE COST 10% 46.620 0.000 46.620 0.000
II MONITORING 1% 4.662 0.000 4.662 0.000
III EVALUATION 1% 4.662 0.000 4.662 0.000
IV ENTRY POINT ACTIVITY 4% 18.648 0.000 18.648 0.000
VTRAININGS & CAPACITY
BUILDING 5% 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
VI DETAILED PROJECT REPORT 1% 4.662 0.000 4.662 0.000
TOTAL 46.620 0.000 46.620 0.000
W/S WORK PHASE
VII NRM 60%
1 ARABLE CONSERVATION WORK
(i) Earthen Bund Ha. 8100 600 48.600 48.600 97.200 7.776
(ii) WHS (Tanka) No. 80000 60 48.000 48.000 96.000 7.680
(iii) Waste weir No. 12000 40 4.800 4.800 9.600 0.768
(iv)Gulley Control Structure Nallah
Bunding No. 10000 29 2.900 0.000 2.800 0.224
(v) Farm Pond No. 50000 10 5.000 0.000 5.000 0.400
2NON ARABLE CONSERVATION
WORK
(i) V Ditch for PD Ha. 17900 10 1.790 0.000 1.790 0.000
(ii) Staggered Contour Trenches for PD Ha. 11800 10 1.180 0.000 1.180 0.000
(iii) Dug out Pond No. 50000 10 5.000 5.000 10.000 0.000
(iv) WHS (Tanka) No. 80000 10 8.000 0.000 8.000 0.000
(v) Nallah Bunding with WW No. 22000 18 3.960 3.960 7.920 0.000
ACTIVITY WISE TOTAL ABSTRACT OF COST
S. N. NAME OF ACTIVITY
TOTAL
Unit RATE QTY. Amt from project
fund
Convergence fund Total Cost Beneficiary
contributionS. N. NAME OF ACTIVITY
TOTAL
3 DRAINAGE LINE TREATMENT
(i) LSCD 'A' No. 17800 95 16.910 0.000 7.120 0.000
(ii) LSCD 'B' No. 16500 140 23.100 0.000 11.550 0.000
(iii) LSCD 'C' No. 15100 150 22.650 0.000 12.080 0.000
(iv) LSCD 'D' No. 13800 150 20.700 0.000 11.040 0.000
(v) LSCD 'E' No. 12400 150 18.600 0.000 12.400 0.000
(vi) Masonry Check Dam No. 0 13 48.530 10.000 106.400 0.000
0 279.720 120.360 400.080 0.000
VIIIPRODUCTION SYSTEM & MICRO
ENTERPRISES 15%
For Arable Land
1 Arable bund Ha. 200 600 1.200 1.200 2.400 0.768
2 Agro Forestry No. 50 9435 4.718 0.000 4.718 1.510
3Horticulture Plantation with fencing &
Tanka No. 15933 60 9.560 9.560 19.120 6.118
4Horticulture Plantation without fencing
(Orchard) No. 10000 50 5.000 0.000 5.000 1.600
5 Vermi Compost No. 36000 24 5.760 0.000 5.760 1.843
6 Crop Demonstration No. 2000 285 3.540 0.000 3.540 1.133
7 Homested Kitchen Gerden No. 1000 95 0.440 0.000 0.440 0.141
8 Medicinal Plants No. 3000 77 1.230 0.000 1.230 0.394
For Non-arable Land
1 V Ditch for PD Ha. 2200 10 0.220 0.000 0.220 0.000
2 Staggered Contour Trenches for PD Ha. 900 10 0.090 0.000 0.090 0.000
3 Fencing of PD (by SW) Ha. 10 3.527 0.000 3.527 0.000
4 Fencing of PD (by DCB) Ha. 10 2.681 0.000 2.681 0.000
TOTAL
Unit RATE QTY. Amt from project
fund
Convergence fund Total Cost Beneficiary
contributionS. N. NAME OF ACTIVITY
TOTAL
1TOOLKIT, TRAINING &
REVOLVING FUND OF SHG 0 19.000 0.000 19.000 0.000
2 LIVESTOCK MANAGEMENT
(i.) Animal Health Camp No. 25000 50 10.250 0.000 10.250 0.000
(ii) Vaccination/Cattle curse 0 0.988 0.000 0.988 0.000
(iii) Purchase of Bull / Pada No. 25000 3 0.750 0.000 0.750 0.000
(iv) A I 0 0.977 0.000 0.977 0.000
0 69.930 10.760 80.690 0.000
IX CONSOLIDATION PHASE 3% 13.986 0.000 13.986 0.000GRAND TOTAL 466.200 131.120 597.320 30.354
TOTAL
Name of the Project IWMP XV 16/1,2,3,4,5,6,7
G.P. 2 NO. 15/8,9
Block Baori IWMPDistrict. Jodhpur Date of Sanction 30.09.2009
Village Covered 4 NO.
Project outlay 466.2 LAC
Total Area 3108 Hectare No. of SHG's formed 6
No. of WC's formed 2 No. of UG's formed 18
Lavera
Kalan Hardhani
Geographical Area 3627 Ha
Effective Area 2706 402 3108 Ha
Project outlay 405.9 60.3 LAC
Total Arable land Ha
1. Irrigated 505 Ha
2. Unirrigated 1350 Ha
Total Nonarable land Ha
1. Pasture 52 Ha2. Govt. / waste /OTHER LAND 1201 Ha
Unit QTY. RATE AMOUNT PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN
I. ADMINISTRATIVE COST 10% 46.62
1 WDT MANDEYA 13.054 11.365 1.688 13.054
2 W C SEC MANDEYA 8.392 7.306 1.085 8.392
3OFFICE EXPENSES (JEEP/STATIONARY &
OTHER) 25.175 21.919 3.256 25.175
SUB TOTAL 46.620 40.590 6.030 46.620
II MONITORING 1% 4.662 4.662 4.059 0.603 4.662
III EVALUATION 1% 4.662 4.662 4.059 0.603 4.662
55.944 48.708 7.236 55.944
W/S PREPARATORY PHASE
IV ENTRY POINT ACTIVITY 4% 18.648 18.648
1 SOLAR LIGHT 45 24200 10.890 45 8.478 2.412 10.890
2 WATER TANKA 7 80000 5.600 7 5.600 0.000 5.600
3 REPAIRING OF TANKA 4 38000 1.520 4 1.520 0.000 1.520
6 OTHER 1 0.638 1 0.638 0.000 0.638
18.648 16.236 2.412 18.648
TotalHardhaniLavera Kalan
(WATERSHED COMMITTEE WISE BREAK UP)
Macro/Micro
Scheme/Batch
NAME OF ACTIVITYTARGET
Watershed Committee Watershed Committee
Date of Approval of the work plan
TOTAL
TOTAL
WATERSHED COMMITTEE WISE WORK PLAN OF TOTAL IWMP-XV
S. N.Project
Unit QTY. RATE AMOUNT PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN
TotalHardhaniLavera KalanNAME OF ACTIVITYTARGET
Watershed Committee Watershed Committee
S. N.Project
V TRAININGS & CAPACITY BUILDING 5% 23.310
1 USERS GROUP
(i) KHARIF 4.810 3.810 1.000 4.810
(ii) RABI 3.000 2.500 0.500 3.000
(iii) HORTICULTURE 3.000 2.500 0.500 3.000
(iv) PASTURE DEVELOPMENT 3.000 3.000 0.000 3.000
2 OTHERS TRAINING & CO 9.500 8.485 1.015 9.500
23.310 20.295 3.015 23.310
VI DETAILED PROJECT REPORT 1% 4.662 4.662 1 4.059 0.603 4.662
4.662 4.662 1 4.059 0 0.603 0 4.662
TOTAL 46.620 40.590 6.030 46.620
W/S WORK PHASE
VII NRM 60% 279.720
1 ARABLE CONSERVATION WORK
(i) Earthen Bund 600 8100 48.600 440 35.640 160 12.960 600 48.600
(ii) WHS (Tanka) 60 80000 48.000 43 34.400 17 13.600 60 48.000
(iii) Waste weir 40 12000 4.800 28 3.360 12 1.440 40 4.800
(iv) Gulley Control Structure Nallah Bunding 29 10000 2.900 27 2.700 2 0.200 29 2.900
(v) Farm Pond 10 50000 5.000 10 5.000 0 0.000 10 5.000
2 NON ARABLE CONSERVATION WORK
(i) V Ditch for PD 10 17900 1.790 10 1.790 0 0.000 10 1.790
(ii) Staggered Contour Trenches for PD 10 11800 1.180 10 1.180 0 0.000 10 1.180
(iii) Dug out Pond 10 50000 5.000 8 4.000 2 1.000 10 5.000
(iv) WHS (Tanka) 10 80000 8.000 8 6.400 2 1.600 10 8.000
(v) Nallah Bunding with WW 18 22000 3.960 14 3.080 4 0.880 18 3.960
3 DRAINAGE LINE TREATMENT
(i) LSCD 'A' 95 17800 16.910 92 16.376 3 0.534 95 16.910
(ii) LSCD 'B' 140 16500 23.100 134 22.110 6 0.990 140 23.100
(iii) LSCD 'C' 150 15100 22.650 144 21.744 6 0.906 150 22.650
(iv) LSCD 'D' 150 13800 20.700 142 19.596 8 1.104 150 20.700
(v) LSCD 'E' 150 12400 18.600 143 17.634 7 0.966 150 18.600
(vi) Masonry Check Dam 13 5 48.530 13 48.530 0 0.000 13 48.530
279.720 0 243.540 0 36.180 0 279.720
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
Unit QTY. RATE AMOUNT PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN
TotalHardhaniLavera KalanNAME OF ACTIVITYTARGET
Watershed Committee Watershed Committee
S. N.Project
VIIIPRODUCTION SYSTEM & MICRO
ENTERPRISES 15% 69.930
For Arable Land
1 Arable bund 600 200 1.200 440 0.880 160 0.320 600 1.200
2 Agro Forestry 8626 73 6.297 8934 4.467 950 0.475 9884 4.942
3 Horticulture Plantation with fencing & Tanka 60 21700 13.020 43 6.851 17 2.709 60 9.560
4Horticulture Plantation without fencing
(Orchard) 20 10000 2.000 47 4.700 3 0.300 50 5.000
5 Vermi Compost 15 36000 5.400 22 5.040 3 0.720 25 5.760
6 Crop Demonstration 180 2000 3.600 270 3.240 30 0.360 300 3.600
7 Homested Kitchen Gerden 100 1000 1.000 85 0.340 15 0.060 100 0.400
8 Medicinal Plants 80 3000 2.400 72 1.080 8 0.120 80 1.200
For Non-arable Land
1 V Ditch for PD 10 2200.000 0.220 10 0.220 0 0.000 10 0.220
2 Staggered Contour Trenches for PD 10 900.000 0.090 10 0.090 0 0.000 10 0.090
3 Fencing of PD (by SW) 10 3.527 10 3.527 0 0.000 10 3.527
4 Fencing of PD (by DCB) 10 2.681 10 2.681 0 0.000 10 2.681
1TOOLKIT, TRAINING & REVOLVING
FUND OF SHG
(i) KARIGER 8 26250 2.100 #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!
(ii) WHITEWASH & PENT 5 40500 2.025 #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!
(iii) TAILORING 5 67000 3.350 #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!
(iv) MASALA UDYOG 5 42200 2.110 #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!
(v) BICYCLE/MOBILE 8 34000 2.720 #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!
(vi) KUMAHRI UDYOG 2 22000 0.440 #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!
(vii) ARI TARI UDYOG 6 50000 3.000 #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!
2 LIVESTOCK MANAGEMENT
(i.) Animal Health Camp 40 25000 10.000 45 9.000 5 1.000 50 10.000
(ii) Vaccination 1.000 0 0.800 0 0.200 0 1.000
(iii) Purchase of Bull / Pada 3 25000 0.750 3 0.750 0 0.000 3 0.750
(iv) A I 1.000 0 0.919 0 0.081 0 1.000
69.930 #REF! #REF! #REF!
IX CONSOLIDATION PHASE 3% 13.986 13.986 12.177 1.809 13.986GRAND TOTAL 466.200 #REF! #REF! #REF!
TOTAL
CHAPTER - 7
ANNUAL ANNUAL ANNUAL ANNUAL
ACTION PLANACTION PLANACTION PLANACTION PLAN
Name of the Project IWMP XV 16/1,2,3,4,5,6,7 Geographical Area 3627 Ha
G.P. 2 NO. 15/8,9 Effective Area 3108 Ha
Block Baori IWMP Total Arable land Ha
District. Jodhpur Date of Sanction 30.09.2009 1. Irrigated 505 Ha
Village Covered 2 NO. 2. Unirrigated 1350 Ha
Project outlay 466.2 LAC Total Nonarable land Ha
Total Area 3108 Hectare No. of SHG's formed 12 1. Pasture 52 Ha
No. of WC's formed 2 No. of UG's formed 18 2. Govt. / waste /OTHER LAND 1201 Ha
QTY. RATE AMOUNT PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN
I. ADMINISTRATIVE COST 10% 46.62
SUB TOTAL 46.620 9.324 9.324 9.324 9.324 9.324 46.620
II MONITORING 1% 4.662 4.662 0.932 0.932 0.932 0.932 0.932 4.662
III EVALUATION 1% 4.662 4.662 2.331 2.331 4.662
55.944 0 0.000 10.256 10.256 12.587 10.256 12.587 55.944
W/S PREPARATORY PHASE
IV ENTRY POINT ACTIVITY 4% 18.648 18.648
18.648 0 0.000 18.648 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 18.648
VTRAININGS & CAPACITY
BUILDING 5% 23.310
23.310 0 0.000 2.200 8.000 6.900 6.000 0.210 0 23.310
VI DETAILED PROJECT REPORT 1% 4.662 4.662 0.000 1 4.662 1 4.662
4.662 4.662 0 0.000 1 4.662 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 1 4.662
TOTAL 46.620 0 0.000 25.510 8.000 6.900 6.000 0.210 46.620
THIRD YEAR
YEAR WISE WORK PLAN OF TOTAL IWMP-XV
FOURTH YEAR FIFTH YEAR SIXTH YEARTOTAL
Date of Approval of the
work plan
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
NAME OF ACTIVITYS. N.TARGET
(YEAR WISE BREAK UP)
Macro/Micro
Scheme/Batch
FIRST YEAR SECOND YEAR
QTY. RATE AMOUNT PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN
THIRD YEAR FOURTH YEAR FIFTH YEAR SIXTH YEARTOTAL
NAME OF ACTIVITYS. N.TARGET
FIRST YEAR SECOND YEAR
W/S WORK PHASE
VII NRM 60% 279.720 0 0 46.620 69.930 69.930 55.944 37.296 279.720
1ARABLE CONSERVATION
WORK
(i) Earthen Bund 600 8100 48.600 0 0 100 8.100 310 25.110 100 8.100 80 6.480 10 0.810 600 48.600
(ii) WHS (Tanka) 60 80000 48.000 0 0 20 16.000 20 16.000 10 8.000 7 5.600 3 2.400 60 48.000
(iii) Waste weir 40 12000 4.800 0 0 15 1.800 8 0.960 8 0.960 4 0.480 5 0.600 40 4.800
(iv)Gulley Control Structure Nallah
Bunding 29 10000 2.900 0 0 11 1.100 4 0.400 2 0.200 8 0.800 4 0.400 29 2.900
(v) Farm Pond 10 50000 5.000 0 0 3 1.500 2 1.000 2 1.000 3 1.500 0 0.000 10 5.000
2NON ARABLE CONSERVATION
WORK
(i) V Ditch for PD 10 17900 1.790 0 0 10 1.790 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 10 1.790
(ii)Staggered Contour Trenches for
PD 10 11800 1.180 0 0 10 1.180 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 10 1.180
(iii) Dug out Pond 10 50000 5.000 0 0 2 1.000 4 2.000 2 1.000 0.000 2 1.000 10 5.000
(iv) WHS (Tanka) 10 80000 8.000 0 0 2 1.600 4 3.200 2 1.600 0.000 2 1.600 10 8.000
(v) Nallah Bunding with WW 18 22000 3.960 0 0 7 1.540 2 0.440 2 0.440 3 0.660 4 0.880 18 3.960
3 DRAINAGE LINE TREATMENT
(i) LSCD 'A' 95 17800 16.910 0 0 10 1.780 10 1.780 10 1.780 40 7.120 25 4.450 95 16.910
(ii) LSCD 'B' 140 16500 23.100 0 0 20 3.300 10 1.650 20 3.300 40 6.600 50 8.250 140 23.100
(iii) LSCD 'C' 150 15100 22.650 0 0 20 3.020 10 1.510 20 3.020 50 7.550 50 7.550 150 22.650
(iv) LSCD 'D' 150 13800 20.700 0 0 20 2.760 15 2.070 10 1.380 80 11.040 25 3.450 150 20.700
(v) LSCD 'E' 150 12400 18.600 0 0 25 3.100 15 1.860 25 3.100 60 7.440 25 3.100 150 18.600
(vi) Masonry Check Dam 13 48.530 0 0 0 0.020 2 8.980 10 36.050 0 0.674 1 2.806 13 48.530
279.720 0.000 46.620 69.930 69.930 55.944 37.296 279.720
VIIIPRODUCTION SYSTEM &
MICRO ENTERPRISES 15% 69.930
For Arable Land
1 Arable bund 600 200 1.200 0 0 0.000 300 0.600 200 0.400 80 0.160 20 0.040 600 1.200
2 Agro Forestry 9884 50 4.942 0 0 0.000 4000 2.000 2000 1.000 2000 1.000 1884 0.942 9884 4.942
3Horticulture Plantation with
fencing & Tanka 60 15933 9.560 0 0 10 1.593 30 4.780 10 1.593 8 1.275 2 0.319 60 9.560
4Horticulture Plantation without
fencing (Orchard) 50 10000 5.000 0 0 0.000 10 1.000 5 0.500 5 0.500 30 3.000 50 5.000
5 Vermi Compost 25 23040 5.760 0 0 1 0.230 5 1.152 7 1.613 7 1.613 5 1.152 25 5.760
6 Crop Demonstration 300 1200 3.600 0 0 10 0.120 50 0.600 50 0.600 40 0.480 150 1.800 300 3.600
7 Homested Kitchen Gerden 100 400 0.400 0 0 20 0.080 30 0.120 30 0.120 20 0.080 0 0.000 100 0.400
8 Medicinal Plants 80 1500 1.200 0 0 10 0.150 20 0.300 20 0.300 20 0.300 10 0.150 80 1.200
TOTAL
QTY. RATE AMOUNT PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN
THIRD YEAR FOURTH YEAR FIFTH YEAR SIXTH YEARTOTAL
NAME OF ACTIVITYS. N.TARGET
FIRST YEAR SECOND YEAR
For Non-arable Land
1 V Ditch for PD 10 2200.000 0.220 0 0 0.000 10 0.220 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 10 0.220
2 Staggered Contour Trenches for PD 10 900.000 0.090 0 0 0.000 10 0.090 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 10 0.090
3 Plantation in PD 1 10 4.946 0 0 0.000 10 3.400 0.600 0.500 0 0.446 10 4.946
4 Plantation in PD 2 10 3.448 0 0 10 2.100 0.500 0.450 0 0.398 10 3.448
5 Fencing of PD (by SW) 10 3.527 0 0 0.000 10 3.527 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 10 3.527
6 Fencing of PD (by DCB) 10 2.681 0 0 0.000 10 2.681 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 10 2.681
1TOOLKIT, TRAINING &
REVOLVING FUND OF SHG 10.606 10.606
2 LIVESTOCK MANAGEMENT 0
(i.) Animal Health Camp 50 20000 10.000 0 0 2 0.400 10 2.000 10 2.000 10 2.000 18 3.600 50 10.000
(ii) Vaccination/Cattle curse 1.000 0 0 0.200 0.300 0.300 0.100 0.100 0 1.000
(iii) Purchase of Bull / Pada 3 25000 0.750 0 0 0.000 2 0.500 1 0.250 0.000 0.000 3 0.750
(iv) A I 1.000 0 0 0.200 0.300 0.300 0.100 0.100 0 1.000
69.930 0.000 2.974 25.670 10.076 8.557 12.047 69.930
IX CONSOLIDATION PHASE 3% 13.986 13.986 0.000 8.392 5.594 13.986
GRAND TOTAL 466.200 0.000 85.360 113.856 99.494 89.149 67.734 466.200
TOTAL
Name of the Project IWMP XV 16/1,2,3,4,5,6,7 Geographical Area 3627 Ha
G.P. 2 NO. 15/8,9 Effective Area 3108 Ha
Block Baori IWMP Total Arable land Ha
District. Jodhpur Date of Sanction 30.09.2009 1. Irrigated 505 Ha
Village Covered 4 NO. 2. Unirrigated 1350 Ha
Project outlay 466.2 LAC Total Nonarable land Ha
Total Area 3108 Hectare No. of SHG's formed 6 1. Pasture 52 Ha
No. of WC's formed 2 No. of UG's formed 18 2. Govt. / waste /OTHER LAND 1201 Ha
QTY. RATE AMOUNT PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN
W/S WORK PHASE
VII NRM
1ARABLE CONSERVATION
WORK
1 Earthen Bund 600 8100 48.600 0.0 0.0 0 0.000 100 8.100 100 8.100 80 6.480 320 25.920 600 48.600
2 WHS (Tanka) 60 80000 48.000 0.0 0.0 0 0.000 20 16.000 10 8.000 7 5.600 23 18.400 60 48.000
3 Waste weir 40 12000 4.800 0.0 0.0 0 0.000 8 0.960 8 0.960 4 0.480 20 2.400 40 4.800
2NON ARABLE CONSERVATION
WORK
1 Dug out Pond 10 50000 5.000 0.0 0.0 0 0.000 4 2.000 2 1.000 0.000 4 2.000 10 5.000
2 Nallah Bunding with WW 18 22000 3.960 0.0 0.0 0 0.000 2 0.440 2 0.440 3 0.660 11 2.420 18 3.960
3 DRAINAGE LINE TREATMENT
1 Masonry Check Dam 2 5 10.000 0.0 0.0 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 1 5.000 1 5.000 2 10.000
120.360 0.000 27.500 18.500 18.220 56.140 120.360
VIIIPRODUCTION SYSTEM &
MICRO ENTERPRISES
For Arable Land
1 Arable bund 600 200 1.200 0.0 0.0 0 0.000 100 0.200 100 0.200 80 0.160 320 0.640 600 1.200
2Horticulture Plantation with
fencing & Tanka 60 15933 9.560 0.0 0.0 0 0.000 20 3.187 10 1.593 7 1.115 23 3.665 60 9.560
10.760 0.000 3.387 1.793 1.275 4.305 10.760GRAND TOTAL 131.120 0.000 30.687 20.093 19.335 59.805 131.120
FOURTH YEAR FIFTH YEAR SIXTH YEAR
(YEAR WISE BREAK UP) (Through Convergence)
Macro/Micro
Scheme/Batch
Date of Approval of the
work plan
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
YEAR WISE WORK PLAN OF TOTAL IWMP-XV (Through Convergence)
S. N. NAME OF ACTIVITYTARGET
FIRST YEAR SECOND YEAR THIRD YEAR
Name of the Project IWMP XV 15/8,9 Geographical Area 402 Ha
G.P. Nandia Kalan HARDHANI Effective Area 402 Ha
Block Baori IWMP Total Arable land Ha
District. Jodhpur Date of Sanction 30.09.2009 1. Irrigated 130 Ha
Village Covered 1 NO. 2. Unirrigated 232 Ha
Project outlay 60.3 LAC Total Nonarable land Ha
Total Area 402 Hectare No. of SHG's formed 2 1. Pasture 0 Ha
No. of WC's formed 1 No. of UG's formed 8 2. Govt. / waste /OTHER LAND 40 Ha
QTY. RATE AMOUNT PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN
I. ADMINISTRATIVE COST 10% 6.03
SUB TOTAL 6.030 0 0 1.206 1.206 1.206 1.206 1.206 6.030
II MONITORING 1% 0.603 0.603 0 0 0.121 0.121 0.121 0.121 0.121 0.603
III EVALUATION 1% 0.603 0.603 0 0 0.302 0.302 0.603
7.236 0 0.000 1.327 1.327 1.628 1.327 1.628 7.236
W/S PREPARATORY PHASE 0 0
IV ENTRY POINT ACTIVITY 4% 2.412 2.412 0 0
2.412 0 0.000 2.412 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 2.412
VTRAININGS & CAPACITY
BUILDING 5% 3.015 0 0
3.015 0 0.000 0.400 1.000 1.100 0.515 0.000 0 3.015
VI DETAILED PROJECT REPORT 1% 0.603 0.603 0.000 1 0.603 1 0.603
0.603 0.603 0 0.000 1 0.603 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 1 0.603
TOTAL 6.030 0 0.000 3.415 1.000 1.100 0.515 0.000 6.030
FIFTH YEARFIRST YEARS. N. NAME OF ACTIVITYTARGET
SECOND YEAR THIRD YEAR FOURTH YEAR
(YEAR WISE BREAK UP)
Macro/Micro
Scheme/Batch
TOTAL
Date of Approval of the
work plan
SIXTH YEAR
Village
YEAR WISE WORK PLAN OF WATERSHED COMMITTEE HARDHANI
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
QTY. RATE AMOUNT PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN
FIFTH YEARFIRST YEARS. N. NAME OF ACTIVITYTARGET
SECOND YEAR THIRD YEAR FOURTH YEARTOTAL
SIXTH YEAR
W/S WORK PHASE
VII NRM 60% 36.180 0 0 6.030 9.045 9.045 7.236 4.824 36.180
1ARABLE CONSERVATION
WORK
(i) Earthen Bund 160 8100 12.960 0 0 10 0.810 50 4.072 40 3.205 53 4.258 7 0.615 160 12.960
(ii) WHS (Tanka) 17 80000 13.600 0 0 2 1.600 4 3.200 7 5.600 3 2.400 1 0.800 17 13.600
(iii) Waste weir 12 12000 1.440 0 0 1 0.120 4 0.480 2 0.240 0 0.000 5 0.600 12 1.440
(iv)Gulley Control Structure Nallah
Bunding 2 10000 0.200 0 0 1 0.100 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 1 0.100 2 0.200
(v) Farm Pond 0 50000 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000
2NON ARABLE CONSERVATION
WORK
(i) V Ditch for PD 0 17900 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000
(ii)Staggered Contour Trenches for
PD 0 11800 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000
(iii) Dug out Pond 2 50000 1.000 0 0 1 0.500 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.000 1 0.500 2 1.000
(iv) WHS (Tanka) 2 80000 1.600 0 0 1 0.800 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.000 1 0.800 2 1.600
(v) Nallah Bunding with WW 4 22000 0.880 0 0 1 0.220 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.000 3 0.660 4 0.880
3 DRAINAGE LINE TREATMENT
(i) LSCD 'A' 3 17800 0.534 0 0 0 0.000 1 0.178 0 0.000 0 0.000 2 0.356 3 0.534
(ii) LSCD 'B' 6 16500 0.990 0 0 3 0.495 1 0.165 0 0.000 0 0.000 2 0.330 6 0.990
(iii) LSCD 'C' 6 15100 0.906 0 0 2 0.302 2 0.302 0 0.000 2 0.302 0 0.000 6 0.906
(iv) LSCD 'D' 8 13800 1.104 0 0 4 0.552 2 0.276 0 0.000 2 0.276 0 0.000 8 1.104
(v) LSCD 'E' 7 12400 0.966 0 0 4 0.531 3 0.372 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.063 7 0.966
(vi) Masonry Check Dam 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000
36.180 0.000 6.030 9.045 9.045 7.236 4.824 36.180
VIIIPRODUCTION SYSTEM &
MICRO ENTERPRISES 15% 9.045 0.035
For Arable Land
1 Arable bund 160 200 0.320 0 0 0.000 60 0.120 40 0.080 53 0.106 7 0.014 160 0.320
2 Agro Forestry 950 50 0.475 0 0 0.000 100 0.050 150 0.075 228 0.114 472 0.236 950 0.475
3Horticulture Plantation with
fencing & Tanka 17 15933 2.709 0 0 2 0.319 4 0.637 7 1.115 3 0.478 1 0.159 17 2.709
4Horticulture Plantation without
fencing (Orchard) 3 10000 0.300 0 0 0.000 1 0.100 2 0.200 0 0.000 0 0.000 3 0.300
5 Vermi Compost 3 24000 0.720 0 0 0 0.000 1 0.240 1 0.240 0 0.000 1 0.240 3 0.720
6 Crop Demonstration 30 1200 0.360 0 0 5 0.060 5 0.060 5 0.060 0.000 15 0.180 30 0.360
7 Homested Kitchen Gerden 15 400 0.060 0 0 5 0.020 5 0.020 0 0.000 5 0.020 0 0.000 15 0.060
8 Medicinal Plants 8 1500 0.120 0 0 0 0.000 0 0.000 5 0.075 0 0.000 3 0.045 8 0.120
TOTAL
QTY. RATE AMOUNT PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN
FIFTH YEARFIRST YEARS. N. NAME OF ACTIVITYTARGET
SECOND YEAR THIRD YEAR FOURTH YEARTOTAL
SIXTH YEAR
For Non-arable Land 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000
1 V Ditch for PD 0 2200.000 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000
2 Staggered Contour Trenches for PD 0 900.000 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000
3 Plantation in PD 1 0 0.000
4 Plantation in PD 2 0 0.000
5 Fencing of PD (by SW) 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000
6 Fencing of PD (by DCB) 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000
1TOOLKIT, TRAINING &
REVOLVING FUND OF SHG 2.700 2.700
2 LIVESTOCK MANAGEMENT 0
(i.) Animal Health Camp 5 20000 1.000 0 0 1 0.200 1 0.200 1 0.200 1 0.200 1 0.200 5 1.000
(ii) Vaccination/Cattle curse 0.200 0 0 0.000 0.050 0.050 0.050 0.050 0 0.200
(iii) Purchase of Bull / Pada 0 25000 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0.000
(iv) A I 0.081 0 0 0.000 0.020 0.030 0.000 0.031 0 0.081
9.045 0.000 0.599 1.497 2.125 0.968 1.155 9.045
IX CONSOLIDATION PHASE 3% 1.809 1.809 0.000 1.085 0.724 1.809
GRAND TOTAL 60.300 0.000 11.370 12.869 13.898 11.131 8.331 60.300
TOTAL
Name of the Project IWMP XV 15/8,9 Geographical Area 402 Ha
G.P. Nandia Kalan HARDHANI Effective Area 402 Ha
Block Baori IWMP Total Arable land Ha
District. Jodhpur Date of Sanction 30.09.2009 1. Irrigated 130 Ha
Village Covered 1 NO. 2. Unirrigated 232 Ha
Project outlay 60.3 LAC Total Nonarable land Ha
Total Area 402 Hectare No. of SHG's formed 2 1. Pasture 0 Ha
No. of WC's formed 1 No. of UG's formed 8 2. Govt. / waste /OTHER LAND 40 Ha
QTY. RATE AMOUNT PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN
W/S WORK PHASE
VII NRM
1ARABLE CONSERVATION
WORK
1 Earthen Bund 40 8100 3.240 0.0 0.0 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 20 1.620 20 1.620 40 3.240
2 WHS (Tanka) 17 80000 13.600 0.0 0.0 0 0.000 0 0.000 7 5.600 3 2.400 7 5.600 17 13.600
3 Waste weir 8 12000 0.960 0.0 0.0 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 4 0.480 4 0.480 8 0.960
2NON ARABLE CONSERVATION
WORK
1 Dug out Pond 2 50000 1.000 0.0 0.0 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.000 2 1.000 2 1.000
2 Nallah Bunding with WW 4 22000 0.880 0.0 0.0 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.000 4 0.880 4 0.880
3 DRAINAGE LINE TREATMENT
1 Masonry Check Dam 1 3.000 0.0 0.0 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 1 3.000 1 3.000
22.680 0.000 0.000 5.600 4.500 12.580 22.680
VIIIPRODUCTION SYSTEM &
MICRO ENTERPRISES 15% 9.045
For Arable Land
1 Arable bund 40 200 0.080 0.0 0.0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 20 0.040 20 0.040 40 0.080
2Horticulture Plantation with
fencing & Tanka 20 15933 3.187 0.0 0.0 0 0.000 0 0.000 7 1.115 3 0.478 10 1.593 20 3.187
3.267 0.000 0.000 1.115 0.518 1.633 3.267GRAND TOTAL 25.947 0.000 0.000 6.715 5.018 14.213 25.947
SECOND YEAR THIRD YEAR FOURTH YEAR FIFTH YEAR
(YEAR WISE BREAK UP) (Through Convergence)
Macro/Micro
Village
Scheme/Batch
SIXTH YEARTOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
Date of Approval of the
work plan
YEAR WISE WORK PLAN OF WATERSHED COMMITTEE HARDHANI (Through Convergence)
S. N. NAME OF ACTIVITYTARGET
FIRST YEAR
Name of the Project IWMP XV 16/1,2,3,4,5,6,7 Geographical Area 3225 Ha
G.P. Lavera Kalan Lavera Kalan Effective Area 2706 Ha
Block Baori IWMP Total Arable land 0 Ha
District. Jodhpur Date of Sanction 30.09.2009 1. Irrigated 375 Ha
Village Covered 3 NO. 2. Unirrigated 1118 Ha
Project outlay 405.9 LAC Total Nonarable land 0 Ha
Total Area 2706 Hectare No. of SHG's formed 10 1. Pasture 52 Ha
No. of WC's formed 1 No. of UG's formed 10 2. Govt. / waste /OTHER LAND 1161 Ha
QTY. RATE AMOUNT PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN
I. ADMINISTRATIVE COST 10% 40.59
SUB TOTAL 40.590 0 0 8.118 8.118 8.118 8.118 8.118 40.590
II MONITORING 1% 4.059 4.059 0 0 0.812 0.812 0.812 0.812 0.812 4.059
III EVALUATION 1% 4.059 4.059 0 0 2.030 2.030 4.059
48.708 0 0.000 8.930 8.930 10.959 8.930 10.959 48.708
W/S PREPARATORY PHASE 0 0
IV ENTRY POINT ACTIVITY 4% 16.236 16.236 0 0
16.236 0 0.000 16.236 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 16.236
VTRAININGS & CAPACITY
BUILDING 5% 20.295 0 0
20.295 0 0.000 1.800 7.000 5.800 5.485 0.210 0 20.295
VI DETAILED PROJECT REPORT 1% 4.059 4.059 0.000 1 4.059 1 4.059
4.059 4.059 0 0.000 1 4.059 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 1 4.059
TOTAL 40.590 0 0.000 22.095 7.000 5.800 5.485 0.210 40.590
FIFTH YEARFIRST YEARS. N. NAME OF ACTIVITYTARGET
SECOND YEAR THIRD YEAR FOURTH YEAR
(YEAR WISE BREAK UP)
Macro/Micro
Scheme/Batch
TOTAL
Date of Approval of the
work plan
SIXTH YEAR
Village
YEAR WISE WORK PLAN OF WATERSHED COMMITTEE LAVERA KALAN
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
QTY. RATE AMOUNT PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN
FIFTH YEARFIRST YEARS. N. NAME OF ACTIVITYTARGET
SECOND YEAR THIRD YEAR FOURTH YEARTOTAL
SIXTH YEAR
W/S WORK PHASE
VII NRM 60% 243.540 0 0 40.590 60.885 60.885 48.708 32.472 243.540
1ARABLE CONSERVATION
WORK
(i) Earthen Bund 440 8100 35.640 0 0 90 7.290 260 21.038 60 4.895 27 2.222 3 0.195 440 35.640
(ii) WHS (Tanka) 43 80000 34.400 0 0 18 14.400 16 12.800 3 2.400 4 3.200 2 1.600 43 34.400
(iii) Waste weir 28 12000 3.360 0 0 14 1.680 4 0.480 6 0.720 4 0.480 0 0.000 28 3.360
(iv)Gulley Control Structure Nallah
Bunding 27 10000 2.700 0 0 10 1.000 4 0.400 2 0.200 8 0.800 3 0.300 27 2.700
(v) Farm Pond 10 50000 5.000 0 0 3 1.500 2 1.000 2 1.000 3 1.500 0 0.000 10 5.000
2NON ARABLE CONSERVATION
WORK 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000
(i) V Ditch for PD 10 17900 1.790 0 0 0 0.000 10 1.790 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 10 1.790
(ii)Staggered Contour Trenches for
PD 10 11800 1.180 0 0 0 0.000 10 1.180 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 10 1.180
(iii) Dug out Pond 8 50000 4.000 0 0 1 0.500 4 2.000 2 1.000 0 0.000 1 0.500 8 4.000
(iv) WHS (Tanka) 8 80000 6.400 0 0 1 0.800 4 3.200 2 1.600 0 0.000 1 0.800 8 6.400
(v) Nallah Bunding with WW 14 22000 3.080 0 0 6 1.320 2 0.440 2 0.440 3 0.660 1 0.220 14 3.080
3 DRAINAGE LINE TREATMENT 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000
(i) LSCD 'A' 92 17800 16.376 0 0 10 1.780 9 1.602 10 1.780 40 7.120 23 4.094 92 16.376
(ii) LSCD 'B' 134 16500 22.110 0 0 17 2.805 9 1.485 20 3.300 40 6.600 48 7.920 134 22.110
(iii) LSCD 'C' 144 15100 21.744 0 0 18 2.718 8 1.208 20 3.020 48 7.248 50 7.550 144 21.744
(iv) LSCD 'D' 142 13800 19.596 0 0 16 2.208 13 1.794 10 1.380 78 10.764 25 3.450 142 19.596
(v) LSCD 'E' 143 12400 17.634 0 0 21 2.569 12 1.488 25 3.100 60 7.440 25 3.037 143 17.634
(vi) Masonry Check Dam 13 5 48.530 0 0 0 0.020 2 8.980 10 36.050 0 0.674 1 2.806 13 48.530
243.540 0.000 40.590 60.885 60.885 48.708 32.472 243.540
VIIIPRODUCTION SYSTEM &
MICRO ENTERPRISES 15% 60.885
For Arable Land
1 Arable bund 440 200 0.880 0 0 0.000 0.000 240 0.480 160 0.320 27 0.054 13 0.026 440 0.880
2 Agro Forestry 8934 50 4.467 0 0 0.000 0.000 3900 1.950 1850 0.925 1772 0.886 1412 0.706 8934 4.467
3Horticulture Plantation with
fencing & Tanka 43 15933 6.851 0 0 8.000 1.275 26 4.143 3 0.478 5 0.797 1 0.159 43 6.851
4Horticulture Plantation without
fencing (Orchard) 47 10000 4.700 0 0 0.000 0.000 9 0.900 3 0.300 5 0.500 30 3.000 47 4.700
5 Vermi Compost 22 23890 5.040 0 0 1.000 0.230 4 0.912 6 1.373 7 1.613 4 0.912 22 5.040
6 Crop Demonstration 270 1200 3.240 0 0 5.000 0.060 45 0.540 45 0.540 40 0.480 135 1.620 270 3.240
7 Homested Kitchen Gerden 85 400 0.340 0 0 15.000 0.060 25 0.100 30 0.120 15 0.060 0 0.000 85 0.340
8 Medicinal Plants 72 1500 1.080 0 0 10.000 0.150 20 0.300 15 0.225 20 0.300 7 0.105 72 1.080
TOTAL
QTY. RATE AMOUNT PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN
FIFTH YEARFIRST YEARS. N. NAME OF ACTIVITYTARGET
SECOND YEAR THIRD YEAR FOURTH YEARTOTAL
SIXTH YEAR
For Non-arable Land
1 V Ditch for PD 10 2200.000 0.220 0 0 0.000 0.000 10.000 0.220 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 10 0.220
2 Staggered Contour Trenches for PD 10 900.000 0.090 0 0 0.000 0.000 10.000 0.090 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 10 0.090
3 Plantation in PD 1 10 4.946 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 10.000 3.400 0.000 0.600 0.000 0.500 0 0.446 10 4.946
4 Plantation in PD 2 10 3.448 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 10.000 2.100 0.000 0.500 0.000 0.450 0 0.398 10 3.448
5 Fencing of PD (by SW) 10 3.527 0 0 0.000 0.000 10.000 3.527 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 10 3.527
6 Fencing of PD (by DCB) 10 2.681 0 0 0.000 0.000 10.000 2.681 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 10 2.681
1TOOLKIT, TRAINING &
REVOLVING FUND OF SHG 0 7.906 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 7.906
2 LIVESTOCK MANAGEMENT
(i.) Animal Health Camp 45 20 9.000 0 0 1.000 0.200 9.000 1.800 9 1.800 9 1.800 17 3.400 45 9.000
(ii) Vaccination 0 0.800 0 0 0.000 0.200 0.000 0.250 0 0.250 0 0.050 0 0.050 0 0.800
(iii) Purchase of Bull / Pada 3 25000 0.750 0 0 0.000 0.000 2.000 0.500 1 0.250 0 0.000 0 0.000 3 0.750
(iv) A I 0 0.919 0 0 0.000 0.200 0.000 0.280 0 0.270 0 0.100 0 0.069 0 0.919
60.885 0.000 2.375 24.173 7.951 7.589 10.891 60.885
IX CONSOLIDATION PHASE 3% 12.177 12.177 0.000 7.306 4.871 12.177
GRAND TOTAL 405.900 0.000 73.990 100.987 85.595 78.018 59.403 405.900
TOTAL
Name of the Project IWMP XV 16/1,2,3,4,5,6,7 Geographical Area 3225 Ha
G.P. Lavera Kalan Lavera Kalan Effective Area 2706 Ha
Block Baori IWMP Total Arable land 0 Ha
District. Jodhpur Date of Sanction 30.09.2009 1. Irrigated 375 Ha
Village Covered 3 NO. 2. Unirrigated 1118 Ha
Project outlay 405.9 LAC Total Nonarable land 0 Ha
Total Area 2706 Hectare No. of SHG's formed 4 1. Pasture 52 Ha
No. of WC's formed 1 No. of UG's formed 10 2. Govt. / waste /OTHER LAND 1161 Ha
QTY. RATE AMOUNT PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN
W/S WORK PHASE
VII NRM 60% 243.540 40.590 60.885 60.885 48.708 32.472 243.540
1ARABLE CONSERVATION
WORK
1 Earthen Bund 560 8100 45.360 0.0 0.0 0 0.000 100 8.100 100 8.100 60 4.860 300 24.300 560 45.360
2 WHS (Tanka) 43 80000 34.400 0.0 0.0 0 0.000 20 16.000 3 2.400 4 3.200 16 12.800 43 34.400
3 Waste weir 32 12000 3.840 0.0 0.0 0 0.000 8 0.960 8 0.960 0 0.000 16 1.920 32 3.840
2NON ARABLE CONSERVATION
WORK 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000
1 Dug out Pond 8 50000 4.000 0.0 0.0 0 0.000 4 2.000 2 1.000 0 0.000 2 1.000 8 4.000
2 Nallah Bunding with WW 14 22000 3.080 0.0 0.0 0 0.000 2 0.440 2 0.440 3 0.660 7 1.540 14 3.080
3 DRAINAGE LINE TREATMENT 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000
1 Masonry Check Dam 1 5 7.000 0.0 0.0 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 1 5.000 0 2.000 1 7.000
97.680 0.000 27.500 12.900 13.720 43.560 97.680
VIIIPRODUCTION SYSTEM &
MICRO ENTERPRISES 15% 60.885
For Arable Land
1 Arable bund 560 200 1.120 0.0 0.0 0.000 100 0.200 100 0.200 60 0.120 300 0.600 560 1.120
2Horticulture Plantation with
fencing & Tanka 40 6.373 0.0 0.0 0.000 0.000 20 3.187 3 0.478 4 0.637 13 2.071 40 6.373
7.493 0.000 3.387 0.678 0.757 2.671 7.493GRAND TOTAL 105.173 0.000 30.687 13.378 14.317 45.591 105.173
SECOND YEAR THIRD YEAR FOURTH YEAR FIFTH YEAR
(YEAR WISE BREAK UP) (Through Convergence)
Macro/Micro
Village
Scheme/Batch
SIXTH YEARTOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
Date of Approval of the
work plan
YEAR WISE WORK PLAN OF WATERSHED COMMITTEE LAVERA KALAN
S. N. NAME OF ACTIVITYTARGET
FIRST YEAR
Jodhpur XV
CHAPTER - 8
PPPPPPPPRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOJJJJJJJJEEEEEEEECCCCCCCCTTTTTTTT
OOOOOOOOUUUUUUUUTTTTTTTTCCCCCCCCOOOOOOOOMMMMMMMMEEEEEEEESSSSSSSS
Jodhpur XV
1. Project Outcome :
By the end of the project, in the project area, it is expected that the water level in the tube-wells increases
considerably and sufficient water for man and productivity should be increased after the completion of the project.
Few parameters which are expected to be increased after the completion of completion as the project are as follow :
S. No. Parameters Before Execution of
Project
Expected Increase after the
Completion of the Project
1 Availability of water
a. Average Water Table in the
Wells
650 ft 300-350 ft.
b. Available Water in the Wells/Tube Wells Wells/Tube Wells/Ponds
2. Agriculture/ Horticulture
a. Total Sowing Area
b. (Net) Sown Area (ha)
c. Production of Major Crops:
• Wheat
• Bajara
• Moong
26-29 quintal/ ha.
15-18 quintal/ ha.
3.5-4 quintal/ ha.
35-40 quintal/ ha.
20-25 quintal/ ha.
5-6 quintal/ ha.
d. Production of Rajka 600-700 quintal 800-1000 quintal
Jodhpur XV
e. Average Production of
Horticulture Plants
50-100 quintal
350-500 quintal
(Different types of fruits plants
Mango, Guava, Ber, Papaya, etc)
3. Live Stock
a. Milk Production 3-7 kg/ animal 7-12 kg/ animal
b. Animal Diseases By regular camps, the various diseases will be reduced
4. Livelihood
a. Average income of family by
introduction of other micro
enterprises
Rs.2500-3000
per month
Rs.4000-5000
per month
b. SHG Groups 10 60 The various homogenous groups
will be constituted and the training of
different activities will be given,
especially for land less families.
During the project period (5-7 years), the various activities will be done. The natural resource management
activities will be done in between the project phase. The proposed NRM works in arable, non arable land and
Jodhpur XV
drainage line treatment will increase the water table, production of agriculture/horticulture crops. Similarly the
livestock will increase the milk production. the year wise various outcomes of the project are as follows :
During the Project Period S.
No.
Activity Unit Before
Project I Yr II Yr III Yr IV Yr V Yr VI Yr VII Yr
1. Engineering Structure
a.
Contour Bund, CVH,
Restoration of Old
structures, Gully
Control Structure
Hect. Nil 1000 2000 700
b. Earth Bunds, WHS,
Anicut
No. Nil
2. Increase of Agriculture Production due to construction of above Engineering Structure
a. Rabi Season (Main
Crops)
• Wheat
• Mustard
Qtl/ ha 29
12
29
12
29
12
35
14
37
15
39
16
40
18
40-50
18-20
b. Kharif Season (Main
Crops)
Jodhpur XV
• Bajra
• Guar
Qtl/ ha 12.5
5.50
12.5
5.5
12.5
5.5
14
6.0
15
8
18
9
20
10
20-25
10-12
3. Increase of Area of Agriculture Production of Engineering Structure
a. Rain fed Area Ha. 1350 3% 5% 7% 8% 10%
b. Irrigated Area Ha. 385 3% 5% 7% 8% 10%
c. Vegetable Area Ha. 20 3% 5% 7% 8% 10%
d. Pasture Development Ha. Nil 10 20
4. Water Table Depth
• May m. 190 160 150 140 130 120
• September m. 170 155 145 135 125 115
• December
m. 180 158 148 138 128 118
5. Availability of
Drinking Water
Dec. Dec. Dec. Dec. Jan. Jan. March May
6. Survival of Plants
• Horticulture
Plants
Nos. 20 30 500 2500 5000 8000 10000 10000
• Forestry Plants Nos. 100 50 450 1000 2500 4000 6000 8000
7. Milk Production per animal
Jodhpur XV
• Cow Kg. 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.5 5.5 6 7 7
• Buffalo Kg. 7.5 7.5 7.5 8 8 8 9 9
• Goat Kg. 2.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.5 3 3 3
8. Control on Migration No. Nil 10% 30% 40% 70% 80%
Critical Assumption
• No severe droughts/ unexpected floods/ natural disasters
• Adequate funds are allocated for the same and released on time.
• There is no significant pest/ disease attack, and if so, then it will have been contained before irreversible damage is done.
• Adverse market conditions do not persist long.
• Sound macro-economic and growth conditions continue and the benefits are widely distributed particularly in the rural areas.
• Facilitating agencies and resource providers have the required competent staff so that timely and appropriate technical advice
and services are provided to farmers whenever required.
• The Capacity Building Plan is implemented, monitored and modified to address evolving needs and feedback from
participants.
• The execution of the Women’s Empowerment Pedagogy is regularly monitored by the District and State level Implementing
Agencies
Means of Verification of indicators
• Baseline surveys like household income ,expenditure, health and nutrition etc at the beginning, mid-term and end of the project
period
Jodhpur XV
• Annual participatory assessment by communities during project period.
• Regular project monitoring reports prepared by project monitoring teams/ agencies.
• Membership and other Records, Minutes of Meetings maintained by the SHGs, WCs/ Individual beneficiaries/project-related
village and local bodies/PRIs.
• External review missions
• Data maintained by Government department (Revenue, Agriculture, Groundwater, Irrigation, Animal Husbandry
Bund
40
Outer Length 40 mtr
Inner Length 36 mtr
Outer Width 15 mtr
Inner Width 11 mtr 15 11
Depth 1 mtr
Upper Area 600
Lower Area 396
Estimate of Dug out Pond
Lower Area 396
36
S. no. Name of work Item no. No Upper
Area
Lower
Area
Depth Qty Unit Rate Amount
1 Layout for Pond 2 102 1 1 204.00 Cu.m. 0.70 142.80
2 Excavation of earth in dry or moist and
disposal of excavated material within
initial lead of 50 m and lift 1.5 m
2.1 In hard soil 119(b) 1 600 396 1 498.00 Cu.m. 85.00 42330.00
3 Stone Pitching 15-23 cm thick
including supply of stones
124
1 52 1 0.2 10.40 Cu.m. 590.00 6136.00
48608.80
Add 3% contingency 1458.3
Total 50067.1
Say 50000.0
Total Area 600 ha
No. of Waste Weir 40
Name of work Conservation
Measure
Production
Measure
Total Cost
Earthen Bund 4860000 120000 4980000
Waste Weir 480000 0 480000.00
5340000 120000 5460000.00
Say 54.60 Lakh
Conservation Measure 5340000.00
Production Measure 120000.00
Abstract of Cost
VEGETATIVE EARTHEN BUND IN ARABLE LAND
CROSS-SECTION OF VEGETATIVE BUND IN ARABLE LAND
Top width =Based on seepage line check
Slope of seepage line 3:1
0.6
1.5 :1
1 :1 US
DS 1
0.6
1 1.5
0.1 1.8 1.2 0.45 m
3.13.1
4.11 m
CS = (Tw+Bw) *Ht
2
CS = 1.85 Sq.m.
Average Cross section 1.85 Sq.m.
Length 1.00 m.
Quantity 1.85 Cu.m.
DESIGN OF VEGETATIVE BUND IN ARABLE LAND
V.I = 0.305 (XS+Y)
0.305(0.8 x 2+1.0)
V.I = 0.549
V.I Vertical interval
X= Rain Fall Factor 0.80.8
Y= Factor due to soil infiltration & Crop cover 11
S= Percent slope 21
He= (Re x VI)1/2
(50) 1/2
He= 0.6199 Say 0.60 m
He Depth of impounding
Re 24Hour rainfall excess in Cms. for 10 year recurrence interval 35
V.I Vertical interval 0.549
Total Height of Bund = 0.6 + 0.4 1.00 m
Top width of Bund = 0.6 m
Bottom width of Bund = 3.1 m
Cross section of bund = (Top width of Bund +Bottom width of Bund) x Height
2
X Section= ( 0.60+3.1) x 1.00
2
X Section= 1.85 Sq.m.
Drawing of Waste Weir
3
SECTION AT A A'
1.5
3.3
2'
2.5
9.0 '
9.00 '
2'
1' 6"
A A'
2.5
Construction of Waste Weir
8
PLAN
Construction of Waste Weir
DETAILS OF WORK AND ABSTRACT OF COST
L B D/H Feet Metre Lab Total Lab Total
1 2 9.5 2 2 76
2 2 2 2 16
1 7.5 2.5 2 37.5
0
0
129.5 3.66485 cum. 92.00 92.00 337.166 337.166
2 2 9.5 2 0.5 19
2 2 2 0.5 4
1 7.5 2.5 0.5 9.375
Excavation in hard soil ordinary
muram or earth mixed with bajri and
kankar or boulder dry or moist &
disposal of excavated material within
initial lead of 30 m and lift of 1.5 m
including dressing etc. complete.
Cement concrete well mixed in
cement mortar ( 1 : 4 : 8 ) laid in
position complete including
curing.Aggregate size upto 50 mm,
Quantity Unit Rate AmountS.
No.Item No. Detail
1 7.5 2.5 0.5 9.375
0
0
32.375 0.91621 cum. 320.10 1586.00 293.28 1453.11
3 2 9.5 1.75 1.5 49.875
2 2 1.75 1.5 10.5
1 7.5 2.5 1.5 28.125
0
88.5 2.50455 cum. 419.80 1503.00 1051.41 3764.34
4 2 6 1.5 3.25 58.5
4 2 1.5 2 24
1 8 2 1 16
9 3
98.5 2.78755 cum. 554.80 1638.00 1546.53 4566.01
5 1 8 3 1 24
0
24 2.2296 Sq.m 105.50 256.00 235.223 570.778
Dry Stone kharanja (15 to 23 cm)
Item 100(A)
Random rubble stone masonary in
cement sand mortar ( 1 : 6 )For
foundation
Random rubble stone masonary in
cement sand mortar ( 1 : 6 ) For
superstructure
curing.Aggregate size upto 50 mm,
HB
6 2 13 1.5 1 39
4 2 1.5 1 12
1 8 1.5 1 12
1 8 1 1 8
71 6.5959 sqm. 67.90 117.00 447.862 771.72
7 2 6 3.25 1 39
4 2 2 1 16 1.4864 sqm.
1 8 1.25 1 10
65 6.0385 sqm. 39.80 48.00 240.332 289.848
4151.81 11753
Rate
Skilled labour 325
Unskilled labour 135
Water A 4151.81
14.87 2007 Amount
87 Labour
Quantity Amount
6.33 2058
Cement plaster including smooth
finishing in cement mortar (1:6) 25
mm thick.
Ruled pointing in cement mortar
(1:3)
Water A 4151.81
B 7601.17
Cement 2 C 11753
Cement 2 250
Total (C+D) 12003
Say 12000
S.
No Rate Amount
1 Sand Cu.m. 380 849.568
2 Stone Agg of 40 mm nominal size Cu.m. 350 288.607
3 Stone Cu.m. 575 3042.96
4 Cement Kg 220 2754.78 12.522 Bag
7058.98
Other 542.183
Total 7601.17
Material
2.235706
0.8
5.3
626.09
Add contingency
Unit Quantity
Material
Total
87 Labour
4152
3Construction of Waste Weir
CROSS SECTION AT A A'
1.5
3.25 '
1 '
2.5
9.0 '
2
1' 6"1' 6"
A A'
2.5
8
PLAN
Estimate of One ha.
Length per ha. = 50 mtr
S. no. Name of work Item no. No Length
Width
(TW+BW)
/2 Hight Qty Unit Rate Amount
1 Earth work Excavation for making of
bund, laying in layers of 15 cm,
breaking of clods, sorting of grass
pebbles, disposal of excavated
ESTIMATE OF VEGETATIVE BUND IN ARABLE LAND
pebbles, disposal of excavated
material up to 1.5 mt Hight and lead
up to 50 m including dressing and
compaction 119 B 1 50 1.85 1 92.50 Cum 85 7862.5
2 Sowing of seeds on the constructed
bund in three rows
114 3 50 150 meter 0.6 90
3 Supply of Stylo/Dhaman seed @ 4 gm
/ m in three rows
CAZRI
Rate
3 50 0.6 Kg 150 90
8042.5
Add 3% contingency 241.3
Total 8283.8
Say 8300.0
Conservation Measure 8100
Production Measure 200
DESIGN OF LOOSE STONE CHECK DAM (LSCD)
186000010196000685
124003 150
165001510013800
1691000231000022650002070000
654
95140150150
Length of
Head wall
No of Lscd Per Unit Cost Total Cost
7 17800
Head Wall Length = 7 m
Plan Elevation
1.5 7 1.5
0.7
0.3 0.3
0.9 0.3 0.3 1.8
GL 0.3 0.3
0.3
Pit
1.6
S. no. Name of work Item no. No Length Width Height Qty rate amount
ESTIMATE OF LOOSE STONE CHECK DAM (LSCD)
0.6
Earth work Excavation in hard
soil up to 1.5 mt Height and
1
2B 1 7.0 1.6 0.3 3.4 92.0 309.1
2B 2 1.5 1.6 0.3 1.4 92.0 132.5
1 7.0 1.6 0.3 3.4
1 7.0 1.3 0.3 2.7
1 7.0 1.0 0.3 2.1
1 7.0 0.7 0.3 1.5
1 1.5 1.6 1.8 4.3
1 1.5 1.6 1.8 4.3
18.3 922.0 16872.6
17314.2
Add 3% Contingency 519.4Total 17833.6
Say 17800
2 Dry stone masonry
21B
soil up to 1.5 mt Height and
deposited excavated material lead
op to 150
Head Wall Length = 6 m
Plan Elevation
1.5 6 1.5
0.7
0.3 0.3
0.9 0.3 0.3 1.8
GL 0.3 0.3
0.3
Pit
1.6
S. no. Name of work Item no. No Length Width Height Qty rate amount
ESTIMATE OF LOOSE STONE CHECK DAM (LSCD)
0.6
Earth work Excavation in hard
soil up to 1.5 mt Height and
1
2B 1 6.0 1.6 0.3 2.9 92.0 265.0
2B 2 1.5 1.6 0.3 1.4 92.0 132.5
1 6.0 1.6 0.3 2.9
1 6.0 1.3 0.3 2.3
1 6.0 1.0 0.3 1.8
1 6.0 0.7 0.3 1.3
1 1.5 1.6 1.8 4.3
1 1.5 1.6 1.8 4.3
16.9 922.0 15600.2
15997.7
Add 3% Contingency 479.9Total 16477.6
Say 16500
2 Dry stone masonry
21B
soil up to 1.5 mt Height and
deposited excavated material lead
op to 150
Head Wall Length = 5 m
Plan Elevation
1.5 5 1.5
0.7
0.3 0.3
0.9 0.3 0.3 1.8
GL 0.3 0.3
0.3
Pit
1.6
S. no. Name of work Item no. No Length Width Height Qty rate amount
ESTIMATE OF LOOSE STONE CHECK DAM (LSCD)
0.6
Earth work Excavation in hard
soil up to 1.5 mt Height and
1
2B 1 5.0 1.6 0.3 2.4 92.0 220.8
2B 2 1.5 1.6 0.3 1.4 92.0 132.5
1 5.0 1.6 0.3 2.4
1 5.0 1.3 0.3 2.0
1 5.0 1.0 0.3 1.5
1 5.0 0.7 0.3 1.1
1 1.5 1.6 1.8 4.3
1 1.5 1.6 1.8 4.3
15.5 922.0 14327.9
14681.2
Add 3% Contingency 440.4Total 15121.6
Say 15100
2 Dry stone masonry
21B
soil up to 1.5 mt Height and
deposited excavated material lead
op to 150
Head Wall Length = 4 m
Plan Elevation
1.5 4 1.5
0.7
0.3 0.3
0.9 0.3 0.3 1.8
GL 0.3 0.3
0.3
Pit
1.6
S. no. Name of work Item no. No Length Width Height Qty rate amount
ESTIMATE OF LOOSE STONE CHECK DAM (LSCD)
0.6
Earth work Excavation in hard
soil up to 1.5 mt Height and
1
2B 1 4.0 1.6 0.3 1.9 92.0 176.6
2B 2 1.5 1.6 0.3 1.4 92.0 132.5
1 4.0 1.6 0.3 1.9
1 4.0 1.3 0.3 1.6
1 4.0 1.0 0.3 1.2
1 4.0 0.7 0.3 0.8
1 1.5 1.6 1.8 4.3
1 1.5 1.6 1.8 4.3
14.2 922.0 13055.5
13364.6
Add 3% Contingency 400.9Total 13765.6
Say 13800
2 Dry stone masonry
21B
soil up to 1.5 mt Height and
deposited excavated material lead
op to 150
Head Wall Length = 3 m
Plan Elevation
1.5 3 1.5
0.7
0.3 0.3
0.9 0.3 0.3 1.8
GL 0.3 0.3
0.3
Pit
1.6
S. no. Name of work Item no. No Length Width Height Qty rate amount
ESTIMATE OF LOOSE STONE CHECK DAM (LSCD)
0.6
Earth work Excavation in hard
soil up to 1.5 mt Height and
1
2B 1 3.0 1.6 0.3 1.4 92.0 132.5
2B 2 1.5 1.6 0.3 1.4 92.0 132.5
1 3.0 1.6 0.3 1.4
1 3.0 1.3 0.3 1.2
1 3.0 1.0 0.3 0.9
1 3.0 0.7 0.3 0.6
1 1.5 1.6 1.8 4.3
1 1.5 1.6 1.8 4.3
12.8 922.0 11783.2
12048.1
Add 3% Contingency 361.4Total 12409.6
Say 12400
2 Dry stone masonry
21B
soil up to 1.5 mt Height and
deposited excavated material lead
op to 150
Earthen bund Name of work : Masonry Check Dam I Watershed : Jodhpur XV 16/2
Left 15
Right 15
Maximum cross section Minimum cross section
Top width =Based on seepage line check
Slope of seepage line 5:1
0.6
0.6
US
DS 2:1 1.3 2.5:1
0.8 2:1 0.5 2.5:1
2.6 3.25 1 1.25
0.85 4 1.6
6.45 2.856.45 2.85
CS = (Tw+Bw) *Ht CS = (Tw+Bw) *Ht
2 2
CS = 3.525 Sq.m. CS = 1.725 Sq.m.
Average Cross section 2.625 Sq.m.
Length 30 m.
Quantity 78.75 Cu.m.
S. no. Name of work Item no. No X Sec Length Depth Qty Unit Rate Amount
1 Excavation of earth in dry or moist and
disposal of excavated material within
initial lead of 50 m and lift 1.5 m
1.1 In Disintegrated rock 119(c)
1 4.84 13 1 62.89 Cu.m. 134.00 8426.93
2 Stone Pitching 15-23 cm thick including
supply of stones
124
1 0.8 13 0.21 2.18 Cu.m. 590.00 1288.56
9715.49
Add 3% contingency 291.5Total 10006.9Say 10000.0
MODEL ESTIMATE OF NALLAH BUNDING
CROSS-SECTION OF NALLAH BUNDING
Top width =Based on seepage line checkSlope of seepage line 4:1
0.6 Stone Pitching2 :1
1.5 :1 USDS 1.5
0.90.9
2.25 30.45 3.6 1.8 0.45
5.8510.75 m
CS = (Tw+Bw) *Ht2
CS = 4.8375 Sq.m.
Average Cross section 4.84 Sq.m.
V-Ditches Area = 10 ha.
DCB Fencing
Name of work Conservation
Measure
Production
Measure
Total Cost
V. Ditch 179600 22000 201600.00Plantation 0 494600 494600.00Fencing DCB 0 268100 268100.00
Total 179600 784700 964300.00Say 9.64 Lakh
Silvi Pasture Development
Abstract of Cost
Estimate for V.Ditch in Pasture
Area Length Width Interval No of row Length
Ha mtr mtr mtr mtr
10 1000 100 6 167 16667
Dhaman require on V-ditch =0.002 kg/m 33 Kg
Spacing 5 mtr
Dhaman require between v-ditches =10 kg/ha 100 Kg
0.6
0.3
S. no. Name of work Item no. No Length Width Height Qty Unit Rate Amount
11 Jungal clearance 107 1 500 50 1 25000 Sqm 1.4 35000
2 Excavation in hard soil or earth
mixed with bajri and kankar or
boulder dry or moist & disposal of
excavated material within initial lead
of 30 m and lift of 1.5 m including
dressing etc. complete. 2(B) 0.5 16667 0.60 0.3 1500.00 Cum 92 138000.0
Kg
3 Making of balls of grass seed(1:1:2:2)
1 grass seed :1 FYM : 2 sand : 2 clay 3/1/9
forest 133 133.00
Per 6 kg
material 17 376.8
4 Sowing of balls of grass seed by
dibbling method at 30 cm spacing
3/2/9
forest 133 133
Per 6 kg
material 109 2416.2
5 Cost of seed CAZARI Jodhpur 133 Kg 150 19950
195743.0Add 3% contingency 5872.3
Conservation Measure 179600.0 Total 201615.3
Production Measure 22000.0 Say 201600.0
Plant to pant Spacing 4 m 24 Sqm No of plant 4166.67
Row to row Spacing 6 m Gap filling 20% 833.3333
Available Area 10 Ha Total no of Plants 5000
Item no
Year No./Year
1 Digging of pit( kankar boulder soil) 112 ('C) 1 0.45 0.45 0.45 1 No 13.4 13.40 67000
2Cost of Plant As per
forest 1 No. 5 5.00 25000
3 Planting of plant 113(A) 1 No. 2.7 2.70 13500
4 Making thavla 117(A) 2 1 1 No. 2.4 4.80 24000
5 Weeding & Hoeing 116 3 1 3 No. 1.2 3.60 18000
6Insecticide treatment Market
rate3
0.03 ml 0 Ltr 300 2.70 13500
7 Watering of plants 115 3 5 15 no 1.8 27.00 135000
8 Transportation of water 5 Km 108 3 5 225 /1000Ltr 35.8 8.06 40275
9 Watch & ward Minimum
wages3
12 36 Month 3240 23 116640
10
Transportation of plants from
nursery to planting site
LS
1
1 1 1 1.00 5000
11 Pruning of plants forest bsr 1 1 1.00 / plants 0.89 0.89 4450
12
Protection of plants from frost / loo
using grass or other locally available
material by making jhonpa of 0.6 m
1 1
1.00 / plants 3.56 3.56 17800
TOTAL 480165Contingency 3% 14405
Grand total 494570
Say 494600.0
Model estimate of Plantation Work in Pasture land
QtyDescription
Total
S.No Length Width Height (Amount for
10 ha.)
Rate AmountUnit
0.9 m
Area 10 Ha
Length 1580 mtr
1.2 m
1.5 m 0.3
1.5 m
1.2 m
Estimate of Ditch Cum Bund Fencing
1.2 m
0.9 m
S. no. Name of work Item no. No Length Width Hight Qty Unit Rate Amount
1 Layout for DCB 2 1580 1 1 3160.00 Cu.m. 0.70 2212.00
2 Excavation of earth in dry or moist
and disposal of excavated material
within initial lead of 50 m and lift 1.5
m
2.1 In hard soil 50% 2(2) 1 790 1.2 1.2 1137.60 Cu.m. 92.00 104659.20
2.2 In Disintegrated rock 50% 2(3) 1 790 1.2 1.2 1137.60 Cu.m. 134.00 152438.40
3 Sowing of seed on ridge 114 1 790 1 1 790.00 Rm 0.60 474.00
Cost of seeds LS 5.00 Kg 50.00 250.00
260033.60Add 3% contingency 7801.0
Total 268084.6Say 268100.0
Staggered Contour Trenches
Stone Wall Fencing Area = 10 ha.
Name of work Conservation
Measure
Production
Measure
Total Cost
Staggered Contour Trenches 117900.072 9000 126900.00Plantation 0 344800 344800.00Stone wall Fencing 0 352700 352700.00
Total 117900.072 706499.928 824400.00Say 8.24 Lakh
Silvi Pasture Development
Abstract of Cost
Particulars Value UnitLength 4 mWidth 0.45 mDepth 0.45 m 4m
No. of trenches per ha 125 no.Dhaman require between SCT =7 kg/ha 60 KgDhaman require on SCT =0.002 kg/m 10 Kg Area = 10.00 ha
S.no Activity Item No Length Width Hight Qty Unit Rate Amount
1 Layout for Trenches 1 5000 5000 meter 0.7 35002 Earth work Excavation in hard soil up to 1.5
mt Hight and deposited excavated meterial
Staggered Contour Trenches
Model Estimate
0.45m
mt Hight and deposited excavated meterial
lead op to 50 m
2.1 In hard soil 50% 2(2) 1 2500 0.45 0.45 506.25 cum. 92 46575
2.2 In Disintegrated rock 50% 2(3) 1 2500 0.45 0.45 506.25 cum. 134 67837.5
Kg
3 Making of balls of grass seed(1:1:2:2) 1 grass
seed :1 FYM : 2 sand : 2 clay
3/1/9
forest
70
70
Per 6 kg
material
17 1190
4
Sowing of balls of grass seed by dibbling
method at 30 cm spacing
3/2/9
forest
70
70
Per 6 kg
material
109 7630
123232.5Add 3% contengecy 3696.975
Conservation Measure 117900 126929Production Measure 9000 Say 126900
Estimate of Stone Wall Fencing
0.6 m
Area 10 Ha
Length 1580 mtr
1.2 m
0.8 m
S. no. Name of work Item no. No Length Width Hight Qty Unit Rate Amount
1 Stone wall fencing
Random rubble loose
stone fencing
111 1 1580 0.7 1.2 1327.2 Cu.m. 258 342417.6342417.6
Add 3% contingency 10272.5Total 352690.1Say 352700
Available Area = 10 Ha No of plant 2500
No.of Staggered Contour Trenches = 1250 Gap filling 20% 500
Total no of Plants 3000
Item no
Year No./Year
1 Digging of pit( kankar
boulder soil)
112 ('C)
1 0.45 0.45 0.45 1 No 13.4 13.40 40200
2 Cost of Plant As per
forest 1 No. 5 5.00 15000
3 Planting of plant 113(A) 1 No. 2.7 2.70 8100
4 Making thavla 117(A) 2 1 2 No. 2.4 4.80 14400
5 Weeding & Hoeing 116 3 1 3 No. 1.2 3.60 10800
6 Insecticide treatment Market
rate 3 0.03 ml 0.009 Ltr 300 2.70 8100
7 Watering of plants 115 3 5 15 no 1.8 27.00 81000
8 Transportation of water 5
Km
108
3 5 225 /1000Ltr 35.8 8.06 24165
9 Watch & ward Minimum
wages 3 12 36 Month 3240 39 116640
10 Transportation of plants
from nursery to planting
site
LS
1 1 1 1 1.00 3000
S.No Length Width Height
Model estimate of Plantation Work in Pasture land
(Amount for
10 ha.)
Rate AmountUnitQtyDescription
Total
11 Pruning of plants forest bsr1 1 1.00 / plants 0.89 0.89 2670
12 Protection of plants from
frost / loo using grass or
other locally available
material by making jhonpa
of 0.6 m dia. Of plant
height and covering the
plant. 1 1 1.00 / plants 3.56 3.56 10680
TOTAL 334755
Contingency 3% 10043Grand total 344798
Say 344800
Project outcomes
Watershed - Jodhpur XV
(a) Natural resource management
1 Erosion
At beginning After treatment At beginningAfter treatment At beginningAfter treatment
Area ha 1114 312 Area ha 232 22 Area ha 207 38
Sheet erosion Rill erosion Gully erosion
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
At beginningAfter treatment
Sheet erosion
Area ha
Area ha
0
50
100
150
200
250
At beginning After treatment
Rill erosion
Area ha
Area ha
0
50
100
150
200
250
At beginningAfter treatment
Gully erosion
Area ha
Area ha
Project outcomes
(b) Productivity Watershed - Jodhpur XV
At
beginning
After
treatment
At
beginnin
After
treatment
At
beginnin
After
treatment
At
beginning
After
treatment
At
beginning
After
treatment
kg/ha 1800 2100 220 520 400 560 400 600 180 300
Moth sesamumBajara Goar Mung
2000
2500
kg/ha
Bajara At beginning
Bajara After treatment
0
500
1000
1500
2000
At beg
innin
g
Aft
er
treatm
ent
At beg
innin
g
Aft
er
treatm
ent
At beg
innin
g
Aft
er
treatm
ent
At beg
innin
g
Aft
er
treatm
ent
At beg
innin
g
Aft
er
treatm
ent
Goar At beginning
Goar After treatment
Mung At beginning
Mung After treatment
Moth At beginning
Moth After treatment
sesamum At beginning
sesamum After treatment
Project outcomes
(b) Productivity Watershed - Jodhpur XV
At
beginning
After
treatment
At
beginning
After
treatment
At
beginning
After
treatment
At
beginning
After
treatment
kg/ha 3000 3300 24000 28000 1200 1500 165 205
Wheat CuminOnion Mustard
25000
30000
kg/ha
Wheat At beginning
Wheat After treatment
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
At beg
innin
g
Aft
er
treatm
ent
At beg
innin
g
Aft
er
treatm
ent
At beg
innin
g
Aft
er
treatm
ent
At beg
innin
g
Aft
er
treatm
ent
Wheat After treatment
Onion At beginning
Onion After treatment
Mustard At beginning
Mustard After treatment
Cumin At beginning
Cumin After treatment
Project outcomes
(C) Milk Production (C) Average Income Per FamilyWatershed - Jodhpur XV
At beginning After treatment At beginning After treatment
Ltr./ Year 12380 15600 Rs./ Month 2200 5000
IncomeMilk
16000
Ltr./ Year
4500
5000
Rs./ Month
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
At beginning After treatment
Ltr./ Year
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
At beginning After treatment
Income
Rs./ Month
For General & OBC Category
Project Contribution
90% 10%
1 Cost of tanka 80000 72000 8000 80000Conservation measure
for water harvesting
60% 40%
2 Cost of Horticulture plantation 10000 6000 4000 10000 Production
3 Barbed Wire Fencing 13900 8340 5560 13900 Production
Total 2+3 23900 14340 9560 23900 Total Cost of tanka unit 103900 86340 17560 103900
No. of Farmers
40 4156000 3453600 702400 4156000
For SC/ST/ BPL
Project Contribution
95% 5%
1Cost of tanka 80000.00 76000 4000 80000
Conservation measure
for water harvesting
80% 20%
2Cost of Horticulture plantation 10000 8000 2000 10000 Production
3 Barbed Wire Fencing 13900 11120 2780 13900 Production
Total 2+3 23900 19120 4780 23900 Total Cost of tanka unit 103900.00 95120.00 8780.00 103900.00
No. of Farmers
20 2078000 1902400 175600 2078000
Total Cost 6234000
1 Conservation Measure 4800000
2 Production Measure 1434000
a From project 956000
b From Contribution 478000
3 Total Contribution 711180.00
Sr. no
Sr. no Name of work
Estimated
cost MeasuresTotal
Estimated
cost Total Measures
Abstract of cost of Tanka with Plantation work
Name of work
VkaWds dh MªkbZx
gSa.M iai
<Ddu 1.5' x 1.5'
2'2'
xkjk dadjhV
1.75
36
flesaUV dadjhV
¼1%2%4½Vkads dk vkxkSj
65'
mDr MªkbZx Ldsy ij ugha
flesaUV dadjhV ¼1%4%8½
6"
13.00
3' 10.5011.5csjÌk iRFkj dh <ksdk
pqukbZ(1:6) 1'3"
eksVkbZ flesaUV dadjhV
¼1%2%4½
1'6" tehu ry 1'6"2' 10.5
Area 0.17 Ha Length 164.9 mtr. Spacing 4 m
Say 165 mtr.
No of post As per length= Length/spacing 41.00
Additional post require after every 10 Posts 4
45.00
Length of Post 7.5 Feet 2.286 m
Width of post 1 Feet 0.3 m
Quantity of one post 0.6858 Sq.m
S.No Description Item no. NoLength of
single wire
Total
lengthKg/mtr Quantity Unit Rate Amount
1 Supply of barbed wire fencing 14
gauge 5 165 825 0.08 66 Kg 46 3036
2 Supply of Jodhpur stone slab for
post 45 30.86 Sq.m 275 8486.78
3 Rehandling of posts to pit LS 45 45.00 No 15 675.00
4 fixing of post in 45 cm. deep pit2B 45 0.45 0.3 0.45 2.73 Cum 92 251.51
5 Cost of binding wire 6 Kg 45 270.00
6 Stretching of barbed wire and fixing
it with the post with thin wire5.5/forest 825 mtr 0.92 759
7 interlacing the barbed wire with
locally available bushy material at a
spacing of 15 cms 5.6/forest 45 45 mtr 5.48 246.6
13478.28
Add 3% contingency 404.35
13882.63
Say 13900.0
Model estimate Barbed wire fencing
Model Estimate of Water Harvesting Structure (tanka)Amount : 80000.00
Capacity 25740.7224 Ltr.
Dia B H
1 Complete O/O 1 13.00 12.25 Aagor Dia > 36 Feet
2 Hall I/I 1 10.50 11.50 2.50 3.2
5 E/W 1 132.70725 1 10.50 3.00 3.2004
6 Concrete 1 132.70725 1 0.50 4.00 25.74072
7 Masonary 1 36.90675 1.25 11.75 1.00
8 G.L to P.L 1 1.75
9 Aslat Around 2.00 9.00 1 0.5
12 Door 1 1.50 1.50 1
13 Ventilater -2 1 1 1
16 Flooring in side Cement 1 86.54625 1 1
17 Flooring on top Cement 1 132.7073 1 1
Deduction 1 1.5 1.5 1
S.No Details of work No.
Measurements
Loose Soil
Compacted MurrumHard Soil
Soft Rock
DETAILS OF WORK AND ABSTRACT OF COST
L W Ht/D Feet M Labour Total Labour Total
1 0
0
0
0
0
0
A Loose Soil 1 132.707 1 2.5 331.768 9.39 cum. 75.00 75.00 704.25 704.25
B Hard Soil 1 132.707 1 3 398.122 11.27 cum. 92.00 92.00 1036.84 1036.84
C Compacted Murrum 1 132.707 1 4 530.829 15.02 cum. 134.00 134.00 2012.68 2012.68
D Soft Rock 1 132.707 1 1 132.707 3.75 cum. 178.00 178.00 667.50 667.50
E Loose Soil 1 113.076 1.5 1.5 254.421 7.2 cum. 75.00 75.00 540 540
Extra lift over initial lift
First lift 1 132.707 0.0929 1.5 18.4928 cum. 10.80 10.80 199.7218 199.7218
Second lift 1 132.707 0.0929 0.2 2.4657 cum. 21.60 21.60 53.25914 53.25914
2 1 132.707 1 0.5 66.3536
0
0
0
66.3536 1.87 cum. 320.10 1586.00 598.587 2965.82
3
1 815.23 1 0.5 407.615
1 113.076 1.5 0.5 84.807
492.422 13.94 cum. 232.60 675.00 3242.444 9409.50
Unit RateS.
No.
AmountDetails of work No.
P/L Cement concrete using 40 mm
nominal size agg. in the ratio of
Cem:Sand:Agg 1:4:8 including
compaction and curing etc complete.
Item 11(3)(1)
P/L Gara concrete using 40 mm nominal
size agg. in the ratio of Agg:Gara 1:0.4,
compaction etc complete.
Item 12(1)
Earth work Excavation in hard soil dry or
moist and disposal of excavated meterial
within initial lift of 1.5 mt height and lead
of 50 metre.
Details of measurement Quantity
4 1 36.9068 1.25 11.75 542.068
0
542.068 15.34 cum. 419.80 1503.00 6439.732 23056.02
5 1 113.08 1.5 1 169.614
1 113.08 1.25 2 282.69
452.304 12.80 cum. 419.80 1096.00 5373.44 14028.80
6
2 9 1 0.5 9
9 0.250 cum. 1031.00 3598.00 257.75 899.50
7 1 132.707 1 1 132.707
0
-1 1.5 1.5 1 -2.25
130.457 12.11 sqm. 218.50 609.00 2646.035 7374.99
8 1 132.707 1 1 132.707
-1 1.5 1.5 1 -2.25
130.457 12.11 sqm. 102.30 265.00 1238.853 3209.15
9 1 86.5463 1 1 86.5463
1 113.076 1.25 1 141.345
227.891 21.17 sqm. 79.80 186.00 1689.366 3937.62
10 1 32.9805 1 11.5 379.276
379.276 35.23 sqm. 67.90 117.00 2392.117 4121.91
P/L stone agg. With C:M 1:4, and plaster
of 25 mm thick on stone slab
Item 41(1)
RR stone masonry in Cement sand mortar
1 : 6, including curing
Item 24(1)(1)
Providing and fixing stone lintel / Pat in
cement mortar 1:6
Item 31
RR stone masonry in Gara and stone
Item (21)(1)
Providing and fixing Jodhpur stone slab
and filling the joints with c:m 1:4,
including curing
Item 36(3)
P/L Cement concrete using 12 mm
nominal size agg. in the ratio of
Cem:Sand:Agg 1:2:4 including
compaction and curing etc complete. 50
mm thick
Cement Plaster 1 : 6 ( 1 cement : 6 sand)
25 mm thick, including curing
Item 68(1)
11 1 40.833 1 2.25 91.8743
1 116.965 1 2 233.93
1 109.115 1 2 218.23
544.034 50.54 sqm. 39.80 48.00 2011.492 2425.92
12 1 1.5 1.5 1 2.25
2.25 0.2 sqm. 0.00 LS 100 500.00
13 0
0
0 200 2000
31404.07 79143.48
79143.00
Rate
Skilled labour 325
Unskilled labour 135 Labour A 31404.07
Water Material B 47739.41
Total C 79143.48
900
G Total (C+D) 80043.48
Say 80000
105.40
Quantity
Pointing 1:3 (1 Cement : 3 Sand),
including curing
Item 70(1)
Other works as per requirement
14230
31404
42.83 13919
Providing and fixing Ms sheet door on the
tanka, including all the fittings
Silt Trap, Jali, Hand Pump etc
Amount
3255
Amount
Add for contingency
Material Consumption Statement
S.
No. Rate Amount
1 Sand Cu.m. 380 3421.38
2 Stone Agg of 40 mm nominal size Cu.m. 400 6249.2
3 Stone Agg of 12 mm nominal size Cu.m. 550 856.983
4 Stone Cu.m. 575 16180.5
5 Cement Kg 220 10544.6 210.9 Bag
6 Stone Lintel 15 Cm Thick Cu.m. 2400 600
7 Stone Slab Sq.m. 300 4359.6
8 Door Sq.m. 2500.00 500
9 Gara Cu.m. 80.00 804.48
43516.7
Other 4222.67
47739.4
UnitMaterial
Silt Trap, Jali, Hand Pump etc
9.00
15.62
10.056
2396.5
0.25
14.53
0.200
1.56
28.14
Quantity
TOTAL
Design of Water Harvesting Structure (tanka)
Collection of Water = Area * rainfall* 80% Capacity as per Structural design
Catchment Area = ^4*D2
D= 11.70 Cum= ^4*Dt2 * Hight
= 107.46 Sqm Dt= Inner diameter of tanka
Rainfall = 0.3 Mtr Dt= 3.2 3.2004
Hight = 3.20
Collection of water = 25.79 Cum
25.7261 Cum
Capacity Cum*1000 Capacity Cum*1000Capacity Cum*1000 Capacity Cum*1000
= 25790 = 25726.1
Hence rainfall on catchment area can fillup the tanka by water
Production
Total capacity of tanka 25726.1 Ltr
Use of water for drinking purpose 40% 10290.4 Ltr
Available water for plantation 60% 15435.7 Ltr
One watering require 15 Ltr
No. of watering per Year 20 No
Total Ltr require per plant per year 300 Ltr
No of plant can survive = Available water for Plantation/ water require per plant per year
= 51.45
say 50 plant
Area- 0.17 Ha
No. of Plants - 50
Year No./Year
1 Earth work Excavation in hard soil dry
or moist and disposal of excavated
meterial within initial lift of 1.5 mt
height and lead of 50 metre.Digging of
pit
2(B)
1 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.22 cum. 92 19.87 993.60
2 Apply of manure
(A) Compost Khad 5.00 kg. 0.4 2.00 100.00
(B) S.S.P. (16%) 1.00 kg. 4 4.00 200.00
(C) Endosulphan (4%) 100 gm 0.10 kg. 30 3.00 150.00
3 Plant cost LS 1 1.00 No 20 20.00 1000.00
4 Planting of plant 113(B) 1.00 No. 3 3.00 150.00
5 Watering of plants (15 litre) 115 3 20 60.00 No. 1.8 108.00 5400.00
6 Making of Thawla atleast 50 cm radius 117(B) 2 1 2.00 No. 1.8 3.60 180.00
7 Weeding & hoeing of plants 45 cm
radius and 15 cm deep
1163
1 3.00 No. 1.2 3.60 180.00
S.
No
Description Item
No.
Total Rate Amount Amount for
50 Plants
Model estimate of Horticulture Plantation in Arable land
Length Width Height Qty Unit
Year No./Year
S.
No
Description Item
No.
Total Rate Amount Amount for
50 Plants
Length Width Height Qty Unit
8 Spray
(A) Endosulphan (35 ec) 3 0.01 Ltr 0.03 Ltr. 280 8.40 420.00
(B) Sulpher 3 0.02 Kg 0.06 200 12.00 600.00
9 Transportation of Plant from Jodhpur 70
km including loading and unloading
LS
1.00 no 2 3.00 150.00
10 Protection of plants from frost / loo
using grass or other locally available
material by making jhonpa of 0.6 m dia.
Of plant height and covering the plant.
Forest
bsr
1 1 1.00 no 3.56 3.56 178.00
TOTAL 187.47 9701.60
Add 3% contingency 291.048Total 9992.65
say 10000.0
S. No. Particulars Quantity Unit Rate (Rs) Amount (Rs)
1 Wooden Ballies (3 m long) 20 No. 70 1400
2 Wooden Ballies (4 m long) 25 No. 80 2000
3 Shade mats for covering the roof 125 Sq. m. 40 5000
4 Binding wire for tying wooden ballies and mats 20 Kg 45 900
5 Labour charges for erection of shades 15 No. 135 2025
6 Shovels, spades, crowbars, iron baskets LS 2000
7 Weighing scale (100 Kg capacity) 1 No. 2500 2500
8 Cow dung 10 Ton 1100 11000
9 Worms @ 3 kg per ton 30 Kg 100 3000
10 Formation of vermi-bed with agro-waste, cow-
dung and worms
20 bed 300 6000
11 Miscellaneous 175
Total Cost 36000
No. of Units 25
Cost for 25 Units 900000
Category No. of Units Contributio
n
Cost from
project
Cost from project
(per unit)
Gen, OBC 20 288000 432000
SC ST 5 36000 144000
Total 25 324000 576000 23040
MODEL ESTIMATE FOR A VERMI-COMPOST UNIT
Returns from Vermi-compost units
Benefits
1 Sale of vermi-compost 250 Ton 4000 1000000
2 Sale of worms @ 5 kg per ton 1250 Kg 50 62500
Total 1062500
Net benefit 1062500 - 900000 162500