Spoerke
Skip Spoerke
Student ID: 0973543
Dr. Kavita Finn
English Composition 120
17 December 2014
The Digital Music Industry: In the Hands of Consumers
While most industries have leveraged the power of the Internet to market their
products to consumers, the music industry has significantly changed because of the
Internet—starting with the creation of digital music formats around 1994. For better or
worse, today’s music industry is digital and driven entirely by consumers. Just a few years
ago, record labels retained complete control of what the world listened to.
In today’s digital music industry, consumers discover new music and push their
favorite musicians to be more creative and original. They use social media as a primary
conversation hub to communicate directly with their favorite musicians and each other.
Because social media is an important communications hub for consumers, it is also
paramount to musicians and record labels in today’s music industry. Musicians and record
labels that use social media in a similar manner as the consumers have an advantage, which
has resulted in some musicians and record labels sustaining highly successful careers
solely from social media.
1
Spoerke
1. The Influential History of Record Labels in the Music Industry
In 1887, the American Graphophone Company was founded by a group of investors
to develop office dictation machines (Wilentz 16). American Graphophone Company
opened a merchandising office in D.C. known as Columbia in 1889. Columbia soon realized
there was not much money in selling office dictation machines, so the merchandising office
began experimenting with recorded music. After the collapse of Columbia’s parent
company in 1893 due to a failing economy, Columbia opened a second office in New York
and continued focusing on recorded music.
Patent rights to Thomas Alva Edison’s phonograph, along with Chichester Bell and
Charles Tainter’s graphophone, led to Columbia becoming “the nation’s premier producer
and promoter of musical recordings” (Wilentz 17). Throughout the 1890s, .the company
secured numerous exclusive music recording agreements with members of John Philip
Sousa’s Marine Corps Band, Bert Williams, Harry McClaskey, Al Jolson, and other successful
musicians. “Recorded earnings in 1910 exceeded a half million dollars” (47) for Columbia,
which would be an economic power equivalent to roughly $248 million today
(MeasuringWorth). W.C. Handy—”the Father of the Blues” (Wilentz 50)—and other black
musicians also joined Columbia in the early 1900s, following the increasing trend in
popularity of jazz music. Columbia had solidified its position as a major player in the music
industry.
In the early 1920s, Columbia began experimenting with electric microphones and
became the first company to release recorded music using them. “Columbia released an
electrical recording of ‘Adeste Fideles’ sung by 850 members of the Associated Glee Clubs
2
Spoerke
of America at the Metropolitan Opera House in 1925” (Wilentz 65). Electric microphones
immediately proved capable of recording large groups of musicians at varying volume
levels and at higher sound quality than the audio funnels that they replaced. Descendants
of those early electric microphones are still being used in every recording studio and many
live performance venues around the world.
Companies like Columbia changed the music industry. With recorded music
becoming widely available, people no longer needed to attend live performances to listen
to music; they could just play a record on their phonograph at home. More significant to the
music industry was how recorded music was exposing the world to many styles of music.
For example, jazz had firmly planted roots in the southeastern part of the United States.
When jazz musicians like W.C. Handy recorded music, however, much of the world listened
and instantly fell in love with the genre.
Regarding the success of Columbia, Big Al Pavlow explains, “Columbia was one of
the great record companies of the Twentieth Century . . . . [Its] existence spanned the
period of time [sic] which saw two of the greatest developments in the history of Western
Music: the Jazz Era followed by the Rock Era” (115). If it were not for Columbia and its
counterparts pushing the limits of the music industry, these two great developments
probably would have never happened.
Record companies eventually became known as record labels because of the label
that is glued to vinyl records, indicating the production company (Klein 2, par. 15). The
largest record companies (known as major labels) chose to extend their reach far beyond
only recording, duplicating, and distributing music. These companies handled nearly every
3
Spoerke
aspect of a musician’s career, like discovery and development of talent, album production
and distribution, tour and band management, marketing and sales, and payroll and legal
representation. By the 1950s, however, major labels had become too large to “discover and
nurture great music and talent” (Spellman 61), and they were forced to ignore many
talented people. Small, independent labels gained traction in the industry by offering
contracts to talented musicians that the major labels left behind.
Independent labels became highly viable options for getting signed—having an
exclusive contract between a record company and musician—for many musicians that
couldn’t gain the attention of a major label. In the 1990s, numerous musicians that were
signed to Independent labels had their songs on the Billboard Top 200. “During one week in
1996, indie labels occupied all top 5 spots on the chart” (62). Successes of those
independent labels inspired the creation of many other independent labels, like
Rhymesayers Entertainment, Jagjaguwar, and Domino Recording Company (Monster 2, 7,
13).
Due to the small-scale of most independent labels, they cannot often handle every
aspect of the musician’s business model like a major label can. Bruce Iglauer compares his
independent label, Alligator Records, to major labels by claiming, “It’s the menu that counts
—not how many are served” (62). To demonstrate significant value for the musicians being
signed, most independent label contracts represent mutually beneficial partnerships.
Certain uncontrolled aspects of the music industry limit all record labels; for
example, labels do not perform the music, write editorial reviews of concerts and bands, or
personally sell albums in music retail stores. Since the 1980s, record labels have applied
4
Spoerke
intense pressure to newly signed musicians to be instantly profitable (Owsinski 39). Those
demands are extremely difficult to meet, and the result is that many extraordinarily
talented musicians have lost recording contracts.
2. The Crippling Conflicts Between Labels and Musicians
Most musicians that signed contracts with recording companies from the 1890s
through the 1940s had already formed sustainable careers without recorded music by
connecting with consumers. “[W.C.] Handy had begun to make his national mark in 1909,
when he moved his band from Clarksdale, Mississippi, to Memphis, [Tennessee]” (Wilentz
50). Handy would later compose numerous songs for Columbia, earning “nearly $40,000 in
author royalties . . . in 1915” (50). $40,000 in 1915 would be the equivalent income value of
about $5,460,000 today, according to MeasuringWorth.
Recording sessions and phonographs were both expensive, so early record label
contracts served as supplemental opportunities for successful musicians—they did not
create careers on their own. By the 1950s, the record labels had changed their approach to
signing new talent and many of these new contracts created careers.
The competition was fierce for limited openings with the record labels, and it was
often an excruciating process for a musician to secure a recording contract. For instance,
when Decca Records first scouted The Beatles on December 31, 1961, The Beatles were
required to audition the next day by recording fifteen songs (The Beatles Bible, par. 1-5).
“The entire session, which began at 11am [sic], took roughly an hour” (par. 5).
5
Spoerke
The Beatles were ultimately passed over for that recording contract and Decca
Records retained ownership of all fifteen recordings (The Beatles Bible, par. 8-9). Bootleg
copies of all fifteen songs entered into circulation in 1977; only five songs, however, have
been released for retail sale. These songs are in the 1995 Anthology 1 collection: (1)
“Searchin’,” (2) “Three Cool Cats,” (3) “The Sheik Of Araby,” (4) “Like Dreamers Do,” and (5)
“Hello Little Girl” (par. 7).
“Prior to [musicians like The Beatles and Bob Dylan], there was an entire industry
devoted to composing songs for others to perform” (Howard, 5). Many musicians signed to
labels were seen as little more than line workers at a factory—allowed to do only what
their supervisors told them to do and how they were told to do it. Elvis Presley was one of
those musicians; Dianna Ross was another (6).
After the labels gave more songwriting liberties to musicians, other problems with
the business model of record labels surfaced. George Howard declares the 1980s music
industry as a “creative wasteland” that lacked the willingness to take risks. This wasteland
made it difficult for musicians like Kurt Cobain to be successful at pitching new musical
styles to record labels. It took Kurt Cobain gaining financial support from multiple business
partners, independently funding his demos, and years of perseverance before releasing
Nirvana’s first album, Bleach, in 1989 (Howard 21). Soon after the release of Bleach,
Nirvana was officially signed to an independent label in Seattle called Sub Pop (21).
“Tensions and turf battles have . . . become a ‘normal’ part of the record company
work climate” (Spellman 7). Musicians would fight with Artist and Repertoire departments
about career development and creativity, and departments within each label experienced
6
Spoerke
high turnover rates due to job dissatisfaction. Top-level executives at the major labels were
striving for higher profits and were willing to do whatever it took to achieve those results.
Meanwhile, the people laboring to make those higher profits often felt as though they were
being “sold out” —converted from artist to commercialized brand (3-8). The conflicts at
major labels had become so drastic by the year 2000 that Peter Spellman advises in The
Self-Promoting Musician, “Artists seeking a major recording contract should seriously
reconsider” (8). The record labels were losing control of the music industry.
3. The New Digital Music Industry
“The day that the first MP3 music file was shared was. . . sometime around 1994”
(Owsinski 12). Sharing this digital music file marked a turning point for the music industry
—a turning point that changed everything. In February of 2001, Napster—the first peer-to-
peer file sharing network—reached its highest point with 26.4 million users and was shut
down later that year, following legal battles over copyright infringement (14). The RIAA
(Recording Industry Association of America) then began targeting consumers for
prosecution who had used other file-sharing services like Limewire and Gnutella (15).
Despite the music industry giants fighting tooth and nail to regain control on their
terms, consumers did not return to the brick and mortar music retailers to purchase
physical copies. Instead, consumers continued to use peer-to-peer file sharing, CD burners,
and other digital music file sharing methods—seemingly unafraid of the possible legal
ramifications that might ensue. Music industry giants were forced to either embrace digital
music or go out of business. In 2003, the iTunes Store became the first digital music retailer
7
Spoerke
to launch and was an instant success (Owsinski 17). Apple announced on February 6, 2013
“music fans have purchased and downloaded more than 25 billion songs” (Apple, par. 1).
After the launch of the iTunes Store, brick and mortar music retailers began closing
down because many consumers were no longer interested in physical copies of music.
More than 3,500 music retailers have now closed (Owsinski 29), including some large
chains like Sam Goody and Tower Records. “There are now fewer than 2,500 dedicated
music retail stores left” (29), forcing consumers to accept the digital era of music, even if
they prefer physical copies of their music libraries.
At one time, musicians experienced significant increases in popularity and album
sales from television appearances or songs being played on the radio; both have lost large
populations of their audience. “Radio is just a shell of its former self, far less relevant in its
impact on the success of an artist” (Owsinski 31). Radio first started losing its appeal when
small, portable music storage devices like iPods were introduced to consumers. It lost more
of its appeal with the release of streaming services like Spotify and Pandora.
“The Disney Channel and Nickelodeon are the only major star-making venues on the
television airwaves today” (Owsinski 35). With the exception of these two children’s
television networks, consumers are not watching shows that once offered exceptional
marketing to musicians. Digital technology introduced consumers to Digital Video
Recording (DVR), On Demand video rental, Netflix and other streaming services, and
hundreds of television channels. These developments have caused many once-popular
television shows, like The Tonight Show and Saturday Night Live, to lose much of their
viewing audience.
8
Spoerke
Many musicians are choosing to forego signing with major labels since music
distribution, radio play, and television appearances were a few of the most influential
benefits of contracts with major labels. Those musicians are instead, assuming complete
control of their careers. The other primary draw to major labels for musicians lies in the
prestige of being signed to a major label, and that draw is still active today.
Major labels retain most of the services they did before digital music, and they do
them effectively for the musicians they sign. Under every circumstance, however, a record
label wants to make money; if they stop making money, the musician loses the contract.
“[Profitability] goes far in explaining why nine out of ten newly signed artists never go on
to record, much less release, a second record” (Spellman 8). The tenth artist will continue
recording and releasing albums until they, too, stop turning profits. For example, Justin
Bieber, One Direction, the Zac Brown Band, and Taylor Swift could each be identified as the
tenth artist that proved profitability for the label. Chances are pretty high, however, that
many people have never heard of Ali Vegas or a band named Copeland, who were both
signed to Columbia in the early 2000s and released albums while under contract.
4. Musicians Embrace the Digital Consumer
Musicians, like most consumers, are paying less attention to the major labels, radio,
and TV. They are instead using streaming services to market their music, and they focus on
only selling one song at a time, not entire albums (Owsinski 57). Most importantly,
however, they focus on having genuine social interactions with their fans, both on the
Internet and in person.
9
Spoerke
Amanda Palmer has shown musicians around the world just how important it is to
be open and faithful to fans, starting after she left her label in 2009. She immediately
launched a series of highly successful social media campaigns. Those campaigns peaked
“with a massively successful Kickstarter campaign in which she raised $1.2 million (the
goal was $100,000) from nearly 25 thousand fans in 31 days” (Owsinski 82). Her successful
campaigns and the fan-driven stardom by some performers, like Justin Bieber and Psy,
provide substantial proof that social media is effective as a marketing tool for success in the
music industry.
On October 13, 2014, U2 released their album titled Songs of Innocence for free to all
Apple customers through the iTunes Store. The album release was automatically
downloaded to iTunes libraries around the world. Numerous consumers and industry
professionals criticized this approach. Sinéad O’Connor even declared, “There was
something almost terrorist about it” (Grow, par. 1). The uproar was because consumers
claim that they were not given a choice to download the music; the iTunes Store forced it
on them. U2 fans may not have minded, but people who do not like U2 tend to agree with
Sinéad O’Connor’s comment.
U2’s frontman, Bono, apologized for the way the album was forced upon everyone,
saying, “I had this beautiful idea. Might have gotten carried away with ourselves” (Newton,
par. 2). Releasing this album was not U2’s first time dealing with digital music promotions,
but it was the first time they had tried to release an album for free to as many consumers as
possible. They tested a new marketing tactic, learned a valuable lesson, and in the process,
taught other musicians what not to do.
10
Spoerke
Other than the one minor hiccup with the release of Songs of Innocence, U2 has been
one of the front-runners for marketing in the new digital music industry. They adopted a
communications strategy that forms communities on multiple facets of social media, to
include the band’s website, Facebook, and Twitter (Khare 5). U2 figured out a way to
connect fans with each other through these communities, instead of only being concerned
about their ability to communicate with fans through social media. U2 fans can share
photos, stories, links, and pretty much anything else they want for the band and other fans
to see (5). It sounds simple enough and logical enough that every musician should be doing
that, but U2 was one of the pioneers in using social media in this way.
Aside from helping connect consumers and musicians, social media places music
discovery in the’ hands of consumers (Preston 10). The musicians who understand the
power of social media benefit from being able to generate honest feedback about their
music and gain fans before playing their first live show and between shows. These
musicians are also more opportunistic with the digital music industry by utilizing
streaming music services as income generators.
Not all record labels have adapted very well to the new social media marketing
frenzy, but those that have are finding that their consumer knowledge is expanding rapidly.
Social media channels allow these labels to answer questions like, “who is buying what
music, in what format, and in which channel” (Lankinen 23). Labels may also use social
media to determine the best markets for music distribution with each artist they have
signed before releasing a new album. Probably the most favorable benefit to record labels
is that social media allows them to compete for musicians in new genres that they would
11
Spoerke
have previously overlooked. The main challenge is deciding which social media platforms
to use.
5. Social Media Opportunities
For the digital music industry, consumers determine the best social media platforms
musicians and labels should use. For instance, MySpace is still a major contributor for
music marketing in some parts of the world, such as Finland (Lankinen 29), but Facebook is
the most popular social network in the United States. Facebook users accounted for “58.88
percent of all social media site visits” in the United States during September of 2014
(Statista). YouTube ranked second in the United States with 18.86 percent of all social
media site visits that same month, according to the Statista data. MySpace did not make
Statista’s list for the United States.
Each social media opportunity, like Facebook and YouTube, has a unique set of
features that the music industry has capitalized on. “Few artists have embedded music
players on Facebook fan pages, implying that, compared with [other social networks], the
focus on Facebook fan pages are on different content” (Lankinen 35). Most musicians
utilize Facebook for disseminating information to their fans by promoting upcoming shows
and providing an open line of communication with fans. YouTube, on the other hand, is
primarily used by musicians for sharing media in the form of videos of shows, new songs,
and music videos. Musicians will often embed YouTube videos on other social media
platforms that produce higher interaction to get direct feedback and promote social
sharing from their fans (Florina 4-5). Furthermore, by obtaining sync licensing through a
12
Spoerke
distributor, such as CD Baby or ReverbNation, musicians can earn royalties every time their
music is streamed online.
Recently trending in the music industry is the use of an online social marketing
strategy called crowdfunding. Simply stated, crowdfunding is when a person, business,
organization, or group seeks pledges from the public to fund the project (Martinez-Canas
1472).
Previously, I mentioned how Amanda Palmer was extremely successful at using this
type of marketing to finance an album that she wanted to record, exceeding her goal by
$1.1 million. She is not the only musician to be successful with crowdfunding though. For
instance, a few guys I used to perform with decided to start a new band—Ghost Owl—in
2013 that they funded with a Kickstarter campaign. They reached their funding goal of
$5,000 in only five days (Ghost Owl – Lessons).
There are thousands of examples of other crowdfunding successes by musicians,
and thousands of other examples of musicians that couldn’t gain the necessary pledges to
fund their project. Crowdfunding, like everything else in the music industry, is only as
strong as the consumers allow it to be.
6. Concluding Thoughts
The music industry evolved following the introduction of digital media. Today’s
music industry is digital and driven by consumers; but, record labels still have significant
roles in the industry—specifically by being able to handle most aspects of a musician’s
business model. Many musicians, however, have found that because record labels no longer
13
Spoerke
have the consumer influence they once did through exposure on radio and television,
record labels are not essential to their success. Musicians were also quick to recognize the
importance of opening direct lines of communication with their fans, which is something
record labels are still learning.
No matter how the music industry changes in the future, today’s musicians and
record labels must embrace the buying behavior of consumers. The musicians and labels
that personally connect with consumers have a much higher chance of being successful
than those that refuse to change with consumer demand. It is entirely up to the consumer
where the industry goes from here.
14
Spoerke
Bibliography
Khare, Virginie Pioche, and Karen Popovich. “Social Marketing And Rock’n’roll: The Power
Of The U2 Brand.” Journal Of The International Academy For Case Studies 18.4
(2012): 29-34. Business Source Complete. Web. 7 Nov. 2014.
Florina, Pînzaru, and Mitan Andreea. “Social Media and Marketing of the ‘Popcorn’ Music
Wave: The Success of Romanian Commercial Musicians Analyzed Through Their
Perceived Image on Facebook and YouTube.” Economics & Sociology 5.2A (2012):
125. Web. 7 Nov. 2014.
Lankinen, Mikko, and Jari Salo. “The use of Social Media for Artist Marketing: Music
Industry Perspectives and Consumer Motivations.” JMM 15.1 (2013): 23-41. Web.
11 Nov. 2014.
Preston, Paschal, and Jim Rogers. “Social networks, legal innovations and the ‘new’ music
industry”, info, Vol. 13 Iss 6 (2011): 8 – 19. Web. 11 Nov. 2014.
Martinez-Canas, Ricardo, Pablo Ruiz-Palomino, and Raul Pozo-Rubio. “Crowdfunding and
Social Networks in the Music Industry: Implications for Entrepreneurship.” The
International Business & Economics Research Journal (Online) 11.13 (2012): 1471.
ProQuest. Web. 13 Nov. 2014.
Pavlow, Big Al. “The Label - The Story Of Columbia Records.” IAJRC Journal 41.3 (2008):
115. Academic Search Complete. Web. 16 Nov. 2014.
Wilentz, Sean. “360 Sound: The Columbia Records Story.” San Francisco: Chronicle Books,
2012. iBook file.
15
Spoerke
Klein, Allison. “How Record Labels Work.” How Stuff Works. How Stuff Works, n.d.. Web. 16
Nov. 2014.
Spellman, Peter. The Self-Promoting Musician. Boston: Berklee Press, 2000. Print.
Owsinski, Bobby. Music 4.0: A Survival Guide for Making Music in the Internet Age. Montclair:
Hal Leonard, 2014. Print.
“The Beatles audition for Decca Records.” The Beatles Bible. Beatles Bible, n.d. Web. 18 Nov.
2014.
Howard, George. Getting Signed! An Insider’s Guide to the Record Industry. Ed. Jonathan
Feist. Boston: Berklee Press, 2004.
“iTunes Store Sets New Record with 25 Billion Songs Sold.” Apple. Apple, 6 Feb. 2013. Web.
19 Nov. 2014.
Grow, Kory. “Sinéad O’Connor Likens U2 to Terrorists for iTunes Album Release.” Rolling
Stone. Rolling Stone, 17 Nov. 2014. Web. 19 Nov. 2014.
Newton, Casey. “Bono apologizes for putting U2’s new album in everyone’s iCloud library.”
The Verge. The Verge, 14 Oct. 2014. Web. 19 Nov. 2014.
“Most popular social media websites in the United States in September 2014, based on
share of visits.” Statista. Statista, n.d.. Web. 20 Nov. 2014.
Ghost Owl – Lessons. “YOU Helped us Hit our Goal in 5 Days! THANK YOU.” Kickstarter.
Kickstarter, 22 Feb. 2013. Web. 20 Nov. 2014.
16
Spoerke
MeasuringWorth. “Your results.” MeasuringWorth. MeasuringWorth, n.d.. Web. 28 Nov.
2014.
Monster, Joyce Ng, Caitlin White, and Brendan Klinkenberg. “25 Independent Record Labels
You Should Know.” Pigeons and Planes. Pigeons and Planes, 13 Feb. 2013. Web. 28
Nov. 2014.
Palmer, Amanda. Amanda Palmer: The new RECORD, ART BOOK, and TOUR’s video poster.
2012. kickstarter.com. Web. 29 Nov. 2014.
ZQ. Free Social Media Icons. 2014. designbolts.com. Web. 29 Nov. 2014.
Ghost Owl. November 20 at the Georgia Theatre. 2014. Facebook.com. Web. 29 Nov. 2014.
Heuer, Andreas. Amanda Palmer at Thebarton Theatre. N.D. ripitup.com.au. Web. 08 Dec.
2014.
Chatterjee, Krishnan. Digital Music Retailer Logos. 2014. florence20.typepad.com. Web. 08
Dec. 2014.
Echlin, Mike. Physical vs. Digital Music Sales. 2011. WriteGreatSongs.org. Web. 08 Dec. 2014.
17