Transcript
Page 1: Effective Removal Of E. coli And Coliform Bacteria By The ... · Effective Removal Of E. coli And Coliform Bacteria By The TivaWater Biosand Filter Introduction The developers of

Effective Removal Of E. coli And Coliform Bacteria By The TivaWater Biosand Filter

Introduction ThedevelopersoftheTivaWaterBiosandfilter(BSF)areprovidingalowcostfilterfortheremoval of E. coliandcoliformbacteriaforhouseholduseindevelopingcountries.ThisBSFwasfirsttestedforuseforareasaroundKampala,UgandaandwasdesignedinKnoxville,Tennessee.IntheKampala,Ugandaarea,TivaWaterprovidessustainableemploymentforarearesidentsastheysell,distributeandservicetheseBSFs. Historically,BSFshaveprovidedanexcellentpoint-of-use(POU)treatmenttechnologywhichisefficientinremovalofpathogensthatcausesignificantintestinaldiseaseinthesedevelopingareas,bothruralandurban.BSFsprovideanaffordableandeconomic,lowmaintenancefilterfortap,well/boreholes,andsurfacewatersources. The following is documentation of the methods and testing results that TivaWater hasproducedsincethedevelopmentofthisfilter.TherearecurrentlythreecompletedexperimentswithinthedocumentregardingtheefficiencyandeffectivenessofthefiltrationoftheTivaWaterfilters.Thefirstexperimentalreviewcontainsthelong-termanalysisofcoliformandE. coli removal bytheColilertIDEXXreagentmethod.Designedtotestthelifespanofthefilters,thismethodprovesthecapabilityofTivaWaterfiltersinremovingcoliformsandE. colibybothpresence/absenceandquantificationof the targetedorganisms.Thesecondexperiment isanattempt toanalyze theinteractionofcoppermetalwithintheTivaWaterfilters.Byunderstandingthemobilityofcopper(II)sulfatethroughthefilter,itispossibletodiscernthecapabilitiesofthefilterinremovingcopper,arsenic, lead,and/orotherpossiblecontaminantmetals similar in ionsizewhichoftenpollutesourcewaters.ThelastreviewconcernsanexperimentwhichimplementsdetectionmethodsofmicrospherespassedthroughfourdifferenttypesofTivaWaterfilters.Theexperimentattemptstoprovewhichsandtypesandmassesofsandaremoreeffectiveinremovingparticles,aswellasgagingwhatsizesofparticlesthosefiltersarecapableofremovingfromsourcewaters.

Page 2: Effective Removal Of E. coli And Coliform Bacteria By The ... · Effective Removal Of E. coli And Coliform Bacteria By The TivaWater Biosand Filter Introduction The developers of

2008IntroducedtoconcreteBisosandFilters(BSF)duringfieldvisittoUganda.

ExtensivetechnicalandfieldresearchconfirmedthatBSFisthemostpracticalfiltermethodforpotentialbusinessmodel.

IncollaborationwithNealCaldwell,designedmodifiedBSFplasticversionthatincludedpre-filter,waterstorageandtap.

PurchasedIDEXXColilertsystemandperformedextensivetestingforE. coli and coliformwithfunctionalmodel.

Conductedmultiplestudiescomparingflowratesandsandconfiguration.

FlowratesandwaterqualitycomparesfavorablytoHydraidBSFproduct.

FieldmarketresearchfocusedonproductimplementationinUganda.

PatentApplicationdatedJune14,2010andplasticmoldordered.

FirstfiltersmanufacturedatDalenProductsplant.

Testingon6PrototypesatDalenLabwithColilertSysteminitiated.

ServiceteaminKampala,Ugandaestablishedandfieldsandproductioninitiated.

Delivered50filterstoUgandaforhomeinstallationandadditionalwaterqualitytesting.

3,200filtersdeliveredbycontainertoKampala,Uganda.

Installedfiltersat5testsitesinUganda,includingsourcewaterfromsurface,tapandwells.

AwardedwaterqualitycertificationfromUgandaNationalBureauofStandards.

TestingforcopperreductionconductedatUniversityofTennessee(UT)CenterforEnvironmentalBiotechnology(seeattacheddatareports).

4,200filtersdeliveredbycontainertoKampala,Uganda.

FieldtestingexpandedtoincludemanysitesinUganda.

ExperimentswithvarioustypesandmassesofsandconductedatTivaWaterlab.

PhaseIofUTconductstestsforefficiencyofbiolayerusingfluorescentdye,seeattached data reports

PhaseIIofUTtestssimulatingparticlesizesofCryptosporidium,VibriocholeraandRotavirusforreductionincompetingfiltermasses.(seeattacheddatareports)

TivaWater Development Time-line:

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

Page 3: Effective Removal Of E. coli And Coliform Bacteria By The ... · Effective Removal Of E. coli And Coliform Bacteria By The TivaWater Biosand Filter Introduction The developers of

Top

Outer Bucket

Inner Bucket

FilterRetainingRing

Filter

SandSeparator Cup

OutletTube

Faucet

Sand

Page 4: Effective Removal Of E. coli And Coliform Bacteria By The ... · Effective Removal Of E. coli And Coliform Bacteria By The TivaWater Biosand Filter Introduction The developers of

HistoryofColiformandE.coliRemovalMethod TestingwasperformedbytheColilertIDEXXreagentmethod,usingapatentedDefinedSubstrateTechnology(DST).ThismethodoftestingusestwonutrientindicatorsONPGandMUG,whichcanbemetabolizedbythecoliformenzymes.Coliform,usingβ-galactosidasetomovefromacolorlesstoayellowproduct,andE. coli,usingβ-glucoronidasetometabolizeMUGtocreatefluorescence.Non-coliformbacteriaaresuppressedbytheColilert’sspecificallyformulatedmatrix.Threelevelsofcontrolwereutilizedperthemanufacturer’sdirectionsfornewlotsofreagentmaterial.DocumentationofQCfrequencyandperformancecanbesubmittedupon request. During the testing process all QCwere found to be in-range and passed.QuantificationofcoliformandE. colilevelsareinterpretedbytheMostProbableNumber(MPN)techniquewhichprovidesthedensityoftargetorganismsper100mlsample.

DataTable1.PercentandLogRemovalofColiformandE. colithroughFilters1-5andComparisontoHydraidProduct

Filter# No.Dates FlowRate(ml/min)

Coliform E. coli Coliform E. coli

1(sand>145) 65 22 99.82 99.55 2.962 2.8442(sand>100) 14 35 99.93 99.55 3.272 2.8093(un-amended)

65 9 99.94 99.38 3.381 2.862

4(sand>145) 14 41 99.62 99.45 2.732 2.5395(sand>145) 14 41 99.92 99.55 3.228 2.809Hydraid 13 192 89.63 98.26 1.358 2.143

Average%Removal AverageLogRemoval

Discussion Table 1 shows efficiency levels for removal of total coliforms and E. coli bacteria byboth percent and logarithmic removal of a range of TivaWater filters. Logarithmic removal isthestandardsystemforexaminingfiltrationperformanceinwatertesting.Filters1and3weredesignatedlong-termfiltersinordertodeterminetheirlifespanunderconstantconditions.TheHydraidfilteruseditsowndesignatedmediamixtureofrocksandsandandnotthesamesandastheTivaWaterfilters.Alldatapointsreadinglessthan1MPNwereconvertedto0.5sincezerosdonotcomputeinthelogarithmicscale.ThefinalaveragesarelimitedbythemaximumE. coli measurementbyColilertinundilutedsourcewaterofaMPNgreaterthan2419.6/100ml.Thus,ifE. coliconcentrationinthesourcewaterwasgreaterthan2419.6,thanthepercentremovalwouldbeunderestimated.

Page 5: Effective Removal Of E. coli And Coliform Bacteria By The ... · Effective Removal Of E. coli And Coliform Bacteria By The TivaWater Biosand Filter Introduction The developers of

Filter AverageConcentrationCuSO4Added(mg/L)

AverageConcentrationCuSO4Finished(mg/L)

Average%Removal

AverageCuSO4 Remaining(mg)inSand

1 137.5 0.413 99.69 137.12 52.87 0.327 97.42 52.53 28.9 0.521 98.34 28.44 4.68 0.602 88.48 4.1

Copper(II)SulfateInfluenceandRemovalMethod Thecopperexperiment isasimulationofmetalcontaminationbychargingTivaWaterfilterswith copper(II) sulfate (CuSO4)fromCuVer 5mlCopper Reagent Powder Pillows. Thesimulationprovidesinsightonthemobilityofheavymetalssuchasarsenicandleadbecauseof theirsimilaritieswith theCopper ion.AstocksolutionofCuSO4was first formulatedataconcentration of 3.9g/100ml. Four standard concentrations of 4, 1, 0.4, and 0.1mg/L wereequivalentto3.32,0.86,0.33,and0.08mg/Lrespectively.Eachrunconsistedofaddingknownconcentrationsofthestocksolutiontoeachofthefilters.Filter1received15ml,2-5ml,3-3ml,and4acontrolreceivingnoamountofsolution.Eachinputofstocksolutionwasaddedto5Lofwaterandtheconcentrationofthemixbeforefiltrationrecorded.Afterthefiltrationtimeperiodof24hours,thevolumeofoutputwasrecordedaswellastheconcentrationofCuSO4 remaining.

DataTable2.PercentRemovalofCopper(II)Sulfateintriplicateexperiments.

Discussion Theamountofcopper(II)sulfateremovedbythesandfilterswasdeterminedintriplicateexperiments.Copper(II)sulfatewasaddedtotapwaterbecausetheuseofcreekwaterledtointerferenceinthecopperreagentpowderpillowmeasurements.Inputwaterconsistedof5LitersofwaterwithvaryingamountsofCuSO4.Theaverageoutputoffinishedwaterwas4.78L..Waterretentionwhichremainsinthesandlayerofthefilteraccountsforthedifferencebetweeninputwaterandfinishedwater.Filter4receivednoCuSO4indicatingtraceamountsofcopperwaspresentinthetapwater.TheamountofCuSO4remaininginthesandisshowninTable2.ItisunknownastohowmuchCuSO4canberetainedinthesandbeforebreakthrough.

Page 6: Effective Removal Of E. coli And Coliform Bacteria By The ... · Effective Removal Of E. coli And Coliform Bacteria By The TivaWater Biosand Filter Introduction The developers of

Filter# %BeadRemoval Coliform E. coliSilica10lb. 80.14 72.22 85.98Silica20lb. 99.16 87.74 96.18USAS10lb. 96.19 93.19 98.80USAS20lb. 98.86 98.48 95.49

%ColilertRemoval

FluorescentMicrosphereRemovalMethod Mixes of Constellation Microspheres from Life Technologies of assorted colors andsizeswereadded tovariousTivaWaterfilters inorder todetermine the rangeof removalofsizedparticlesbyfiltration.Thesizesofthemicrospheresrangedfrom0.02micrometersto4micrometersandthecolorsrangedfromblueacrossthespectrumtored.TheAccuriC6FlowCytometerwasusedtoidentifypopulationsofbeadswithininputandoutputsamplesaswellasthesizesofthebeadspresentinbeforeandafterfiltrationsamples.Atemplateofknownbeadsizepopulationsfromapreviousexperimentwasoverlaidacrossastandardofthebeadstopredictthesizesofthebeads.Allfiltersinvolvedwiththeexperimentwereuniqueinthattwosetsofsandtypesandsandmassesweretested.TheefficiencyofcoliformandE. coli removal bythecolilerttestonfivedifferentrunswasusedtoverifythefunctionalityofthebiolayerinTivaWaterfilters.

DataTable3.PercentRemovalofFluorescentMicrospheresamongVaryingFilterSandsandMasses

Discussion Inall experiments, threepopulationsofmicrospheresof twodistinct sizescontained95%ofthemeasuredbeads.Populations1and2were1micrometerbutdifferedincolorwith1and2beinggreen.Population3was2micrometersandlabeledaredcolor.Thesensitivityofthecytometerwaslimitedtoquantifyingparticlesequalorgreaterthan1micrometer.Thepercentbeadremovalwas80%to99%withahigherpercentageremovalinthe20lbfiltersthanthe10lbsandfilterswhichwasconsistentwiththehigherpercentageremovalofE. coli andcoliforms.

Page 7: Effective Removal Of E. coli And Coliform Bacteria By The ... · Effective Removal Of E. coli And Coliform Bacteria By The TivaWater Biosand Filter Introduction The developers of

Conclusion ColiformandE. coliremovalexperimentsindicatethatfilterswith20lbsofsandconsistentlyremovedover99.62%ofcoliformsand99.37%ofE. coliformorethan2years.Theminimumlogremovalofcoliformswas2.73and themaximum log removalofcoliforms3.38. Similarly, theminimum E. coli logremovalwas2.53andthemaximumE. coli logremovalwas2.86. TheseminimumlogremovalvaluesexceededtheaverageHydraidlogremovalvaluesbylog1.17and0.72forcoliformsandE. coli,respectively. Copper(II)sulfateremovalexperimentsindicatethat20lbsandfiltersremovedbetween97.42and99.69%of theaddedcopper(II)sulfate.Copperwasusedasametalsurrogate forarsenicandleadbecauseuseofarsenicwasprohibitedduetoitstoxicityanddisposalissues.It iscurrentlyunknownwhetherpollutionofheavymetals isaproblem in thecityofKampala,Uganda.

Thefluorescentmicrospherebeadexperimentsindicatethatbeadsinthesizerangeof1to2micrometersareremovedmoreefficientlyinthe20lb.sandfilterscomparedtothe10lb.sandfiltersandrangedfrom80%inthe101b.silicasandfiltertogreaterthan99%inthe20lbsilicasandfilters.Particlesthatare1micrometerinsizearesmallerthanmostbacterialandprotozoanpathogenssuchasVibrio cholerae(2-3microns)andCryptosporidium(5-6microns).

Insummary,thecombinedcolilerttestingandmicrospheretestingsuggeststhatthefilterswilleffectively removebacterialandprotozoanpathogens.While the lifespanof theTivaWaterfilterisundetermined,theColilertexperimentconcludesthatefficacyisnotdiminishedaftertwoyearsofconstantfiltration.Moretestingwillbeneededtoverifyremovalofmetals.

Page 8: Effective Removal Of E. coli And Coliform Bacteria By The ... · Effective Removal Of E. coli And Coliform Bacteria By The TivaWater Biosand Filter Introduction The developers of

SamuelA.BlountUniversityofTennesseeB.S.EnvironmentalScienceMinorinSustainability

AliceLayton,Ph.D.TheUniversityofTennesseeResearchAssociateProfessorCenterforEnvironmentalBiotechnology

BenCurryTheUniversityofTennesseeGraduateResearchAssistantPh.D.Student

TheTivaWaterFilterExperimentswereperformedunderthesupervisionofDr.AliceC.Layton,ResearchAssociateProfessoroftheUniversityofTennessee’sCenterforEnvironmentalBiotechnologyLab.Mr.BenCurry,GraduateResearchAssistanceandPh.D.studentoftheUniveristyofTennessee,alsoprovidedas-sistanceinanalyzingexperimentaldata.TheexperimentswerecarriedoutbyMr.SamuelBlount,UndergraduateResearchAssistantattheUniversityofTennesseeandTivaWaterResearcher.Dr.Laytonhasreviewedthefinalreport.


Recommended