Environmental Sustainability and Fishing Opportunities
Seeking Balance in a Changing World
Introduction
• How the World is Changing• How, working together, Governments, First
Nations, Industry and Stakeholders, can: • Maintain a balance between the opportunity to
fish and • Meet, and be seen to meet, our ecological
sustainability objectives and obligations• Economic sustainability, in the context of
commercial fisheries must also be provided for in this context
The Changing World
• Three themes• Two were intended to be “evolutionary” in
nature– changes in fishery management approaches
through domestic policy and international and legal changes
– External, including the market, factors influencing future fisheries management approaches
• One, SARA, has more immediate impacts
Evolutionary Change• Policy and international change includes• Government of Canada’s policy to adopt the Precautionary
Approach (PA)• The Oceans Act• In response, we have initiated work on WSP and application of the
PA to domestic fisheries through Objectives Based Fisheries Management including discussions with the fishing industry on ecosystem considerations.
• International developments lead by our ratification of UNFA• NAFO, NASCO, ICES
• Discussions with stakeholders were underway with a view to reaching a consensus on these changes and implementing them over time
External Drivers of Change• An alphabet soup that includes
– MSC– Global NGOs, WWF, TRAFFIC-CITES– Groups pushing for boycotts of fish due to sustainability concerns
• Time lines are short 3-5 years at the outside• NGOs do not see UNCLOS as effective and are starting to look at
alternatives to diplomatic solutions • Seamount ecosystem degradation, bio-diversity loss, and perceived
unsustainable fisheries are all driving their sense of urgency and the search by NGOs for more direct action
• Governments, in partnership with those fishing, will increasingly be placed in a position where fisheries will need to be seen to be sustainable
SARA
• Links to– Bio-diversity– Ecosystem considerations– Proof of sustainability through required reports– PA in the sense that if we fail at PA, SARA is the safety net for
the species• SARA obligates Ministers and government to act, unlike
the Fisheries Act it is not permissive• Time lines processes, standards are tight and defined
within the act• Roles of COSEWIC, Governments, First Nations
resource users and stakeholders needs to be more fully defined
Integrated Action is Needed to Respond
• Stop the problem from growing– Implement the PA , WSP and OBFM including
ecosystem considerations
• Work together on response to current COSEWIC assessments
• Work with all stakeholders to bring more order to the process, COSEWIC related regulations, processes to respond to assessments, consultation, and clarification of listing and recovery plan processes
Next Steps
• Response to current assessments
• Listing decisions, dialogue, Government, First Nation and stakeholder roles
• Rebuilding plan processes
• Improving the process