Transcript
Page 1: Heat Transfer Project Zirconium Billet Temperature

Page 1

Heat Transfer Project

Zirconium Billet Temperature

by Brent Staleyand Brad Smith

Page 2: Heat Transfer Project Zirconium Billet Temperature

Page 2

Background

• Zirconium rods are used to house the fuel pellets in nuclear reactors

• Prior to extrusion, the billets must be lubricated to prevent sticking on the die

• The billets must be heated to a specific temperature for the lubricant to cure properly

Page 3: Heat Transfer Project Zirconium Billet Temperature

Page 3

Objective

• Heat a Zirconium billet to a desired temperature in a barrel of water and measure the time

• Calculate time needed to achieve desired temperature and compare with measured time

Page 4: Heat Transfer Project Zirconium Billet Temperature

Page 4

Page 5: Heat Transfer Project Zirconium Billet Temperature

Page 5

Calculations

• Assumptions:– Infinite cylindrical shape assumed– Temp. of the barrel wall equals temp. of the

water– Thermal properties are constant throughout

the billet – Spatial effects were considered– Temp. of the water is constant throughout the

barrel

Page 6: Heat Transfer Project Zirconium Billet Temperature

Page 6

Calculations

Free Convection of Concentric Cylinder

Page 7: Heat Transfer Project Zirconium Billet Temperature

Page 7

Calculations

Page 8: Heat Transfer Project Zirconium Billet Temperature

Page 8

Experimental Setup

Popcorn can - hold the water

Pyrometer – measure the surface temperature of billet

Thermometer – measure temperature of the water

Overhead bridge with block of wood – lower the billet into water

Heat plate – heat water to desired temp.

Stop watch – for obvious reasons

Page 9: Heat Transfer Project Zirconium Billet Temperature

Page 9

Experimental results

• Temp. water – 180 F• Starting temp. of billet – 78 F• Final temp. of billet – 166 F• Calculated time from 78 F to 166 F – 228

sec• Measured time – 180 sec• Difference of 48 sec

Page 10: Heat Transfer Project Zirconium Billet Temperature

Page 10

Conclusions

• The calculated time was 1.27 times longer than the measured time

• We can attribute this discrepancy to: - End effects of the billet - Interference of the pyrometer with water vapor

- 1st order approximate assumption method is just that – an approximation


Recommended