IAEAInternational Atomic Energy Agency
Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology
Optimisation in CR & DR L03
IAEA 2
Educational Objectives
• Provide rationale for optimisation in Computed Radiography (CR) and Digital Radiography (DR)
• Describe components of optimisation and specific methods to detect, correct, and avert errors in CR and DR
• Identify standards and references for optimisation in CR and DR
Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L03 Optimisation in CR and DR
IAEA 3
Optimisation includes …
• All activities that ensure consistent, maximum performance from physician and imaging facility1
• “A distinct series of technical procedures which ensure the production of a satisfactory product”
• Four steps …• Acceptance Testing (AT)• Establishment of baseline performance• Diagnosis of changes in performance• Verification of correction of deterioration
1National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. (1988) Quality Assurance for Diagnostic Imaging, NCRP Report No. 99, Bethesda, MD;
Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L03 Optimisation in CR and DR
IAEA 4
Optimisation includes both personnel and equipment
• Identifying aspects of facility operation that require decisions or actions
• Establishing policies with respect to these• Encouraging compliance through education and
recognition• Analyzing records at regular intervals
• Dose optimisation• Image quality optimisation
Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L03 Optimisation in CR and DR
IAEA 5
“What’s my motivation?”
• Regulatory Compliance• International BSS• National Regulations
• Standards of Care• Standards established by professional
societies
• Providing the highest quality medical care
• MANAGING RADIATION DOSE!!!
Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L03 Optimisation in CR and DR
IAEA 6
Factors that affect image quality and patient dose
Factor Contrast Resolution Noise Patient Dose
Focal spot size
X
Off-focus radiation
x (x) x
Beam filtration
x X
Voltage waveform
(x) x x
kVp X (x) X
mA (x)
S X
mAs (x) X X
SID X X
Field size X X
Scatter rejection
X XWolbarst (1993) Table 19-1
Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L03 Optimisation in CR and DR
X: very important connection
x: sometimes significant
(x): sometimes noticeable
IAEA 7
Quantifiable Consequences of Degraded Performance
• Loss of Contrast Sensitivity
• Loss of Sharpness/Spatial Resolution
• Loss of Dynamic Range
• Increase in Noise• Decrease in System
Speed• Geometric
Distortion• artefacts
• Decrease in diagnostic accuracy
• Increase in observer time/fatigue
• Delay of diagnosis• Increase in patient
radiation dose• Decrease in
efficiency of imaging operation
Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L03 Optimisation in CR and DR
IAEA 8
Inherent limitations of human operators
• Every process that depends on a human is a source of random errors
• Every process that automation performs independently is source of systematic errors.
• Human errors increase exponentially with the complexity of the system and operator interface.
• It is not a question of whether, but when errors will occur.
?
Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L03 Optimisation in CR and DR
IAEA 9
Someone has to reconcile the checking account
• The technologist/supervisor must accept responsibility for appropriate delivery of all images to the physician.
• Processes must be in place to verify that all exams performed and all images acquired reach their intended destinations (note: an image count of two does not necessarily mean both the PA and LAT views!).
• Processes must be in place to correct errors when detected.
Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L03 Optimisation in CR and DR
IAEA 10
Some traditional components of optimisation
• QA Committee• Policies and Procedures• Reject Analysis• Radiologist Film Critique• Operator QC Activities• Service Events• Technologist In-service training• Medical Physicist QC Activities• Incident investigation/troubleshooting• Error log maintenance
Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L03 Optimisation in CR and DR
IAEA 11
Reject Analysis once considered unnecessary with CR/DR
• Low repeat rates initially reported with DR• DR is tolerant of incorrect exposure factor
selection• Criteria for improper exposure lacking
• Most DR systems include QC Workstations• Capacity to modify non-diagnostic images before
release
• Bad electronic DR images can disappear without a trace
Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L03 Optimisation in CR and DR
IAEA 12
Conventional Reason for Repeated Exam
• Artefacts• Mispositioning• Over-collimation• Patient motion• Double exposure• Inadequate inspiration
• Overexposed - too dark• Underexposed - too
light• Marker missing or
wrong• Wrong exam• Wrong patient• Film lost in processor
Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L03 Optimisation in CR and DR
IAEA 13
CR/DR Reason for Repeated Exam
• Artefacts• Mispositioning• Over-collimation• Patient motion• Double exposure• Inadequate
inspiration
• Overexposed - high exposure index
• Underexposed - low exposure index
• Marker missing or wrong• Wrong exam• Wrong patient• Lost image
• corrupt data, cannot transfer• deleted by operator (waste
bin)• Auto-pilot
Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L03 Optimisation in CR and DR
IAEA 14
How does one perform reject analysis?
• Develop method for capturing rejects• Collect data
• 3% vs. 12%?
• Analyze data• Report results to management and staff• Implement training as indicated• Share results with vendors
Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L03 Optimisation in CR and DR
IAEA 15
How can electronic system accommodate reject analysis?
• Develop codes for Radiologist exam critique
• QC Techs append critique code to patient name and modify Accession number, and Exam Description (Procedure) Fields
• “None” files archived as usual• Modified exam routing tables
prevent widespread dissemination of rejected images
• “None” files available for review
Some vendors implement reject analysis
Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L03 Optimisation in CR and DR
IAEA 16
DR systems must be operated properly to make good images!
• Select the proper examination• Properly associate demographic
and exam information to image• Properly manipulate the detector• Review the image before
releasing • Know how to recover from errors
without repeating examination• Follow exposure factor control
limits• Select appropriate factors for
paediatrics and young adults
Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L03 Optimisation in CR and DR
IAEA 17
Human operators need to know what is expected of them.
• Vendor applications training is never sufficient.
• Local policies and practice must be developed, communicated, documented, reinforced, and enforced.
• Clinical Competency Criteria are helpful for standardizing and documenting basic proficiency training.
• Training must be tailored for technologists, radiologists, clinical engineers, and PACS personnel.
• Radiation protection training of referring physicians should also be considered.
CRITICAL ELEMENTS S U
OPERATOR LEVEL
1 Has knowledge of the following status changes and how to differentiate between them.
a. "WARNING"
b. "LOCKED"
c. "ERROR"
2 Demonstrates ability to differentiate between an error "CODE" message and a "Service" message
3 Demonstrates the ability to properly identify the cassette and image plate location on the displayed pictogram when a jam occurs.
4 Has knowledge that the [RESET] button should never be pressed by personnel other that an AGFA service engineer.
5 Has knowledge of the correct extension to call the PACS Trouble call line.
SUPERVISOR LEVEL
6 Demonstrates ability to clear a plate jam in the Upper Section of the ADC70 by performing the proper sequence of events.
a. Makes sure there are no cassettes protruding through the emergency slot.
b. Properly raises the top cover.
c. Locates and unlocks support rod, and secures top cover into position with support rod.
d. Properly removes any jammed cassettes or image plates.
Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L03 Optimisation in CR and DR
IAEA 18
So how do you go about establishing optimization?
• Define hospital processes from scheduling patient to reporting diagnosis (workflow analysis)
• Define PACS components and processes that support hospital processes (IHE references, system architecture)
• For each hospital process, identify operational roles and responsibilities (task allocation matrix)
• Identify reasonable failure scenarios. Identify single points of failure. Minimize by redundancy. (failure modes and effects analysis)
• Institute performance measures that indicate when processes are working and detect, correct, and document errors. Add to the task allocation matrix.
• Create, document, test, and train downtime and recovery procedures.
• Periodically review and publicize the results of measurements and adjust as needed.
Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L03 Optimisation in CR and DR
IAEA 19
Reasons for differences between CR and DR optimisation
• CR cassette-based vs. integrated receptor DR• Cleaning• Physical defects• Erasure• Mis-identified patient, view,
orientation• Need adequate knowledge of
radiographic technique• Separation between image
acquisition and development• Time• Geographic (PACS)
• Distinctions are blurring• Poorly integrated DR• Integrated CR
Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L03 Optimisation in CR and DR
IAEA 20
Consider QC procedures to be a series of sieves …
Caught by RT before exam
Caught by RT after exam
Caught by Supervisor
Passed on to Radiologist
Errors RT – Radiography Technologist
Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L03 Optimisation in CR and DR
IAEA 21
Which image is worse?
Reported by radiologist Subsequent image, same machine,reported by same radiologist
Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L03 Optimisation in CR and DR
IAEA 22
3. Verify exam with physician
5."Arrive" patient in RIS
6. Escort patient to exam room
7. Explain exam to patient
8. Select and ID cassettes
9. Position patient, cassette, x-ray tube
10. Perform exam
11. Scan cassette
14. Review images at QC
15. Repeat necessary?
17. Complete exam in RIS
END
4. Schedule exam in RIS
12. Preview images
13. Repeat necessary?
18. Release patient
1. Patient arrives in imaging department
Y
Y
N
N
START
2. Is exam scheduled?
N
Y
16. Release images to PACS
QC?
QC?
QC?
QC?
QC?
QC?
QC?
QC?
Process map
• Flowchart of steps• Identify potential QC
control points• actions to be taken
• Identify “work-arounds”• Example: What if RIS
is out-of-service?• How to continue
operations?• Don’t forget actions
on restoration of service
Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L03 Optimisation in CR and DR
IAEA 23
Step 1. Patient reports for an examination.
• The technologist verifies:• the patient is the person identified in the exam
request• the anatomy to be examined matches the exam
request• other information about the patient, such as
• Pregnancy• Restricted motion• Allergies• Appliances
• QC accomplished by training or checklist
Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L03 Optimisation in CR and DR
IAEA 24
Step 2. Technologist identifies the patient and exam to the imaging
system• Usually occurs before, but
sometimes after the exam is performed
• Misidentification has consequences• incorrect information can cause
image unavailability• incorrect exam info can affect image
development • mis-association complicates error
detection• proliferation of digital images
complicates correction
• Automation of association = imperfect QC!
• New classes of errors
Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L03 Optimisation in CR and DR
IAEA 25
The best image, improperly identified, is useless.
• Consequences of misidentification:• Broken studies• Orphans• Exceptions• Penalty Box
• Automation of association:• RIS interfaces• Bar code scanner augmentation• DICOM Modality Worklist
Management (MWL)• unscheduled exams
• resource re-allocation
Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L03 Optimisation in CR and DR
IAEA 26
Step 3. Technologist positions the patient in the radiation field and performs the
examination• Potential errors
• mispositioning• patient motion• incorrect radiographic technique selection• poor inspiration• improper collimation• incorrect alignment of x-ray beam and grid• wrong exam performed• double exposure
• QC accomplished at acquisition station?• Image processing inadequate to correct• Correction requires repeated exam (s)
Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L03 Optimisation in CR and DR
IAEA 27
Results: Rejects during one month
Reason Number %mispositioned 240 53.3%artifacts 40 8.9%test images 22 4.9%nondiagnostic 20 4.4%patient motion 14 3.1%misplaced marker 10 2.2%no marker 6 1.3%under-exposed 5 1.1%inadequate contrast 4 0.9%over-exposed 2 0.4%wrong exam 2 0.4%wrong patient 2 0.4%Total 450 100.0%
Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L03 Optimisation in CR and DR
IAEA 28
Step 4. Image receptor captures the radiographic projection
• Potential errors• Inadequate erasure, lag, ghosting• Improper compensation for non-uniform gain• Incorrect gain adjustment• Incorrect exposure factor selection• artefacts
• Interference with the projected beam• Receptor defects• Interference with converting the captured projection
into a digital image
• Detection possible at acquisition station?• Correction may require repeated exam• Can be averted by active QC
Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L03 Optimisation in CR and DR
IAEA 29
Active QC countermeasures: emphasize avoiding vs. correcting
errors• Prophylactic erasure at start of shift• Periodic checks of non-uniformity corrections• Periodic gain re-calibration• Technique guide• Periodic checks of Automatic Exposure Control
(AEC) calibration• Periodic cleaning of equipment and
environment• Thorough Acceptance Testing of new receptors
• Also incidental to service events and software upgrades
Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L03 Optimisation in CR and DR
IAEA 30
Step 5. Image receptor renders the captured projection for viewing
• Potential errors• Incorrect Exposure Field recognition; incorrect
determination of values of interest (VOI)• Incorrect histogram re-scaling• Incorrect gray-scale rendition• Incorrect edge restoration• Inappropriate noise reduction• Incorrect reorientation
• QC possible at acquisition station?• Correction usually possible without repeated
exam
Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L03 Optimisation in CR and DR
IAEA 31
Functions of the QC workstation: sometimes integrated into acquisition
station• Modify image processing• Imprint demographic overlays• Add annotations• Apply borders or shadow masks• Flip and rotate• Increase magnification• Conjoin images
• Scoliosis• Full leg
• Modify sequence of views• Verify exposure indicator • Select images for archive• Delete images
Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L03 Optimisation in CR and DR
IAEA 32
Step 6. Acquisition station transfers the image to the archive
• Potential errors• Transmission failure• Image deletion from
local cache• Information omitted
from transmitted image• Exposure indicator• Processing
parameters• Shutters• Annotations
Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L03 Optimisation in CR and DR
IAEA 33
Step 7. Digital image is displayed for viewing by a physician
• Potential errors (hard or soft copy)• Incorrect GSDF calibration• Inadequate matrix
• Moire’ (interference) patterns• Inadequate spatial resolution
• Incorrect or missing demographics or annotations
• Inadequate viewing conditions• Errors not filtered by previous QC
• QC => Radiologist “Film” critique
Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L03 Optimisation in CR and DR
IAEA 34
Task Allocation MatrixTask Responsibility Frequency
Verify Patient ID and exam info Radiographer Each exam
Verify Patient Positioning Radiographer Each view
Verify Image Quality – release or repeat Lead Radiographer
Each image
Verify exam in PACS Lead Radiographer
Each exam
Reconcile patient data/image counts in PACS
Medical Informatics
Incidental
Report substandard images Radiologist Incidental
Erase cassette-based image receptors Radiographer Start-of-shift
Test image receptor uniformity Radiographer Weekly
Clean cassette-based image receptors Radiographer Monthly
Compile and review reject analysis data Lead Radiographer
Monthly
Verify display calibrations Clinical Engineer Quarterly
Review QC indicators QA Committee Quarterly
Verify receptor calibrations Medical Physicist Semi-Annual
Verify x-ray generator functions Medical Physicist Annual
Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L03 Optimisation in CR and DR
IAEA 35
Get the radiologists actively involved.
• Key element to any successful optimization program.• Incidental guidance valuable.• Radiologist’s Film Critique more valuable.
• Codes transcribed into report• includes availability and quality items• documents causes and frequency of substandard imaging;
tracks improvement• mechanism for establishing responsibility for quality of service
Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L03 Optimisation in CR and DR
IAEA 36
New accommodations for testing in CR
Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L03 Optimisation in CR and DR
IAEA 37
Value of automated self-tests
• Some manufacturers provide automated self-tests
• Should provide operator with assurance that unit is ready for clinical use
• Actions should be clearly indicated by faults
• Should provide longitudinal information on system performance
Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L03 Optimisation in CR and DR
IAEA 38
What do you do with the QC data?
• Because systems are relatively new, manufacturers are uncertain about longitudinal data
• Lower limit for test is MTF @ 2.5 lp/mm = 17%
• CsI(Tl) is hygroscopic – columnar structure is degraded
• Both systems depicted required detector replacement
A6 QAP data y = -0.0023x + 104.85
R2 = 0.2349
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
3/20/03 6/28/03 10/6/03 1/14/04 4/23/04 8/1/04 11/9/04 2/17/05 5/28/05 9/5/05
Date
Sp
atia
l MT
F a
t 2.
5 lp
/mm
XQi C1 y = -0.0052x + 218.2
R2 = 0.8897
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
2/13/2002 9/1/2002 3/20/2003 10/6/2003 4/23/2004 11/9/2004 5/28/2005 12/14/2005
Date
MT
F @
2.5
lp
/mm
Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L03 Optimisation in CR and DR
IAEA 39
Commitment to optimisation
• The optimisation effort is integral to how you organize and perform the work.
• The cost of optimisation is trivial compared to the cost of inefficiency: consider one bad patient outcome.
• Training for optimisation is professional development for hospital staff.
• Leverage local resources for optimisation expertise.• Biomedical engineering• Medical informatics / Information services• Medical Physicists• Hospital QA personnel
Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L03 Optimisation in CR and DR
IAEA 40
Who is responsible for optimisation?(“It takes a village …” )
• Physician responsible for clinical service is ultimately responsible
• Medical Physicist oversees the program• Radiographer makes day-to-day
measurements, verifies post-repair integrity
• Service engineer carries out repairs, PM, calibrations
Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L03 Optimisation in CR and DR
IAEA 41
Answer True or False
• Random error is a source of inherent limitation of human operators
• It is the responsibility of the physician to ensure appropriate delivery of all images to PACS
• High doses can go undetected with the use of DR or CR systems
Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L03 Optimisation in CR and DR
IAEA 42
Answer True or False
• True. Every process that depends on a human operator is a source of random errors and every process that automation performs independently is source of systematic errors.
• False. The technologist/supervisor is responsible for appropriate delivery of all images to the PACS
• True. DR and CR have wide latitude and high doses can go undetected. Optimised exposure parameters should be used in digital systems.
Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L03 Optimisation in CR and DR
IAEA 43
References:
Comprehensive QC Plan for CR
Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L03 Optimisation in CR and DR