Transcript
Page 1: Impact of Standardized Management of Central Venous Catheter

Impact of the Standardized Management CVCHospital del Trabajador de Santiago

Santiago, ChilleRN M l Q i t illRN Marcela Quintanilla

January 1st to December 31st, 2010

Page 2: Impact of Standardized Management of Central Venous Catheter

The Issue

• The Hospital del Trabajador de Santiago is a Hospital i li d i tspecialized in trauma

• The rate of IBSRC and Insertion Site increased in I t i C U it b t 2008 2009 Intensive Care Unit between 2008 – 2009 years

• With a surveillance system we found a great variability of procedures techniques for CVC maintenanceof procedures techniques for CVC maintenance

Page 3: Impact of Standardized Management of Central Venous Catheter

The Intervention

Involve: Meeting of physicians and nurses for analyzing the issue and to taking actionsand to taking actions.Education: Train physicians (anesthetist, intensive care physicians) and nurses on:

– Add transparent dressing with Chlorhexidine gel pad (Tegaderm CHG) for covering CVC I.V. Sites (Non-Tunnelized) in patient in ICU. Except patients with history of allergy, burned patients, diaphoretics and the ones that have less than 24 hrs of installation.

– Change the transparent Dressings every 5 days, preparing the skin with Chlorhexidine

– Train in application and removal techniques for the transparent dressings

– Surveillance bi-monthlySurveillance bi monthly– Maintain monitoring

Page 4: Impact of Standardized Management of Central Venous Catheter

The Results

• We compare the rate of IBTRC between 2009 and 2010Th CVC IV Sit i f ti d d f • The CVC IV. Site infection decreased from 3,8 to 2,7 x 1000 days

• Cost related to 1 bacteremia according to American • Cost related to 1 bacteremia, according to American publications is between USD 3,700 to USD 29,000

• Cost during 2009 = USD 145.0000. gPost-intervention cost decreased in 2,5 times.

• Total Cost of the intervention in H it l d l T b j d USD 11 300 Hospital del Trabajador = USD 11,300 (Training + Tegaderm CHG)

Page 5: Impact of Standardized Management of Central Venous Catheter

Engaging Othersg g g

• Engaging the ICU team with Medical Director and ith th I f ti P ti C itt twith the Infection Prevention Committee support

• In stage 1, Clinical nurses didn’t accept the new t h l (T d CHG) b th did ’t t t it technology (Tegaderm CHG) because they didn’t trust it. Gradually nurses begun to trust in the new product and gradually results improvedgradually results improved.

• Nurses gained experience, so they could decide when to change the Transparent dressing according to the change the Transparent dressing according to the saturation of the Chlorhexidine gel pad.

Page 6: Impact of Standardized Management of Central Venous Catheter

Greatest Learnings / Largest Challengesg g g

• Interventional plans based on effective actions are useful only with active and systematic surveillanceonly with active and systematic surveillance

• Have to consider in the intervention program the Demming’s quality CircleDemming s quality Circle

• Results must be measured considering the learning process of the people involved.

• Infection Prevention Committees must lead this kind of issues and receive Medical Director support

Page 7: Impact of Standardized Management of Central Venous Catheter

Your Best AdviceStandardizing the practices of non- tunneling CVC i t d ti ith CVC maintenance and continue with active surveillance.

Page 8: Impact of Standardized Management of Central Venous Catheter

Sustaining Changeg g

Continue with epidemiologic surveillance bi-monthly, i t t ith di t f db k f th measuring quarter rates with direct feedback of the

clinical team.


Recommended