Transcript
Page 1: Individual Differences in  Defense Mechanisms

Individual Differences in Defense Mechanisms

• Freud concerned with DMs at level of human nature

• Later researchers examined individual differences– E.g.,. Which defenses one tends to use– Developmental changes in defense

Page 2: Individual Differences in  Defense Mechanisms

Individual Differences in Degree of Defensiveness

• Repressor – Sensitizor Concept

• Definition:– Repressor: Avoid conscious experience of

anxiety– Sensitizor: Approach conscious experience of

anxiety

• Variability in normal personality styles

Page 3: Individual Differences in  Defense Mechanisms

Measurement of RS

• Original RS scale ambiguous in terms of whether or not low anxiety was a result of psychological defenses

• Later scheme used two measures together:– Taylor Manifest Anxiety Scale (TMAS)– Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale

(MCSD)

Page 4: Individual Differences in  Defense Mechanisms

Measurement of RS

• TMAS – measure of dispositional anxiety– Low = High =

• MCSD - measure of social desirability or defensiveness; tendency to present overly positive image to self (self-deception) and others (impression management). E.g., I never get mad– Low = High =

Page 5: Individual Differences in  Defense Mechanisms

Measurement of RS

TMAS MCSD

•Repressor Low High

•Low Anxious Low Low

•Defensive Anx.High High

•Sensitizor High Low

Page 6: Individual Differences in  Defense Mechanisms

Validity of RS measurement

• I. Self-reported anxiety– Classify Ps as repressors/sensitizors– Put in threatening situation– Assess anxiety– Problems?

Page 7: Individual Differences in  Defense Mechanisms

Validity of RS measurement

• II. Self-reported anxiety and physiological responses– Classify Ps as repressors/sensitizors– Put in threatening situation– Assess anxiety and monitor GSR– Self-report/GSR dissociation

Page 8: Individual Differences in  Defense Mechanisms

Validity of RS measurement

• III. Childhood memories– Classify Ps as repressors/sensitizors– Ask Ps to recall childhood memories– Prediction– Findings– Mechanisms: Encoding and retrieval effort

(alpha waves for Rs)

Page 9: Individual Differences in  Defense Mechanisms

Repressors Vs. Sensitizors

•Health Implications

•Advantages/disadvantages of different styles

•Adaptability of defense mechanisms

Page 10: Individual Differences in  Defense Mechanisms

Research on Unconscious

• Two questions:

– Unconscious content (can we demonstrate existence of unconscious content?)

– Unconscious process (can we be affected by stimuli not consciously perceived?)

Page 11: Individual Differences in  Defense Mechanisms

Unconscious Content

• Unconscious = material available but not accessible

– Hypermnesia - recall previously inaccessible material

• Clinical; recovered memories

– Problem; paramnesia (false memory)

Page 12: Individual Differences in  Defense Mechanisms

Unconscious Content

• Hypermnesia– Lab; Erdelyi

• Present stimuli (words, pictures)• Exhaustive recall tx 1• Free associate• Exhaustive recall tx 2• Results tx2 > tx1 (false memory controlled)

Page 13: Individual Differences in  Defense Mechanisms

Unconscious Content

• Dissociation - nonunitary consciousness (no awareness of material but external evidence for material)– Clinical:

• DID

• Emotion awareness

–Problem: report bias

Page 14: Individual Differences in  Defense Mechanisms

Unconscious Content

• Dissociation - Lab research

– Hypnosis (Hilgard)

• Suggestion: No experience of pain

• Immerse hand cold water–No pain reported but automatic

writing suggests pain

Page 15: Individual Differences in  Defense Mechanisms

Unconscious Content

• Dissociation - Lab research– Implicit/Explicit memory divergence

• Explicit memory - conscious, deliberate recall

• Implicit memory - material affects task performance

Page 16: Individual Differences in  Defense Mechanisms

Implicit-Explicit Memory Experiment

• Demonstrate implicit but no explicit memory

• Present Words Explicit test Implicit test» Hair 0

HA_ _

» Bear BE_ _

• Antegrade amnesiacs• Normal participants (with delay)

Page 17: Individual Differences in  Defense Mechanisms

Unconscious Content

• Implicit Stereotypes• An implicit stereotype is a stereotype that is

powerful enough to operate without conscious control.

• The more closely associated two concepts are, the easier it is to respond to them as a single unit. So, if young and good are strongly associated, it should be easier to respond faster when you are asked to give the same response

Page 18: Individual Differences in  Defense Mechanisms

Unconscious Processes

• Perceptions– Semantic Priming

• Prime Target Lexical Decisions• Doctor Nail Faster for related

• Doctor Nurse* target/prime pairs

• Hammer Nail* Related concepts

• Hammer Nurse activated

– Masked primes (not perceived) yield same effect

Page 19: Individual Differences in  Defense Mechanisms

Unconscious Processes

• Perceptions– Social Priming

• Person perception (inherent ambiguity)• Activated (primed) constructs affect

perceptions• Occurs without awareness

Page 20: Individual Differences in  Defense Mechanisms

Unconscious Processes• Perceptions

– Social Priming Experiment (Higgins, Srull)

– Study 1 (prime hostility)• Sentence completion: hit cat the his

• 80% (primed hostile) vs. 20%)

– Study 2 (person perception)• ambiguous description (e.g., refuse to donate)

– Primed hostile perceive target more negatively• no awareness; can prime subliminally

Page 21: Individual Differences in  Defense Mechanisms

Unconscious Processes

• Affective reactions– Zajonc. Mere exposure effect: Familiarity

produces liking• Present stimuli left ear

• Shadow prose right ear

• Prefer exposed stimuli but no recognition

• Occurs with other stimuli (e.g., geometric shapes)

Page 22: Individual Differences in  Defense Mechanisms

Unconscious Processes

• Affective reactions– Silverman. Psychopathology. Explicit test of

psychoanalytic model– Model:

• Unconscious activate wish > Defense mechanisms > Related pathology if defenses inadequate

– Subliminal presentation of aggressive stimuli increase levels of depressed for clinically depressed

Page 23: Individual Differences in  Defense Mechanisms

Unconscious Processes

Related Issue: What is the quality of unconscious thought?

Is it superior to conscious thought?

Although controversial, some research (Dijksterhuis) suggests unconscious decisions are better

Page 24: Individual Differences in  Defense Mechanisms

Unconscious vs. Conscious Thought

• What is conscious thought?– Thinking about something while consciously

attending to it

• What is unconscious thought?– Thinking about something while not attending

to it• Associating, reasoning, weighing, evaluating while

consciously thinking about something else

Page 25: Individual Differences in  Defense Mechanisms

Dijksterhuis (2006)

• Participants receive information about 4 apartments

• Each apartment is described by 12 aspects (Apt. A is big, Apt. C is in a nice area).

• Information for each apartment is presented for 15 secs.• Three apartments have 5 positive and 7 negative aspects.• One is better: 8 positive and 4 negative.• Participants choose an apartment• 1. Immediately• 2. After thinking about it for three minutes• 3. After being distracted for three minutes

(unconscious thought)

Page 26: Individual Differences in  Defense Mechanisms

Percentage Choosing Best Apartment

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

condition

immediate

conscious

unconscious

Page 27: Individual Differences in  Defense Mechanisms

Unconscious Thought

• Always better?– Complex rather than simple– Processing not acquiring (input assumed to be

acquired)– Some failures to replicate


Recommended