Transcript
Page 1: Interlaboratory study animal proteins in feed 2013 v2

IAG ring test animal proteins 2013

L. van Raamsdonk, V. Pinckaers, J. Vliege

Page 2: Interlaboratory study animal proteins in feed 2013 v2

Goals

● Quality support of participants

● Method performance

Ring test animal proteins

Page 3: Interlaboratory study animal proteins in feed 2013 v2

Ring test animal proteins

Procedure

● Preparation of samples; send 5 March

● Examination; return 12 April

● Preparation of report; draft ready 6 June

Page 4: Interlaboratory study animal proteins in feed 2013 v2

Ring test animal proteins

Materials, based on an artificial feed

● Blank sample

● Sample with fish meal 2%

● Sample with 0.05% ruminant MBM (Uruguay)

● Sample with 0.1% of tricalcium phosphate (TCP)

Page 5: Interlaboratory study animal proteins in feed 2013 v2

Ring test animal proteins

Microscopic method

● New amended version of R (EC) 152/2009

● Effective from 12 February, but no official SOPs at the time of the ring test

● New elements in procedure

● Implemented in ring test: examination of flotate or raw material

● Not implemented: repetition of examination

● Not implemented: official report texts

Page 6: Interlaboratory study animal proteins in feed 2013 v2

Ring test animal proteins

microscopy 53 participants; 53 sets

PCR 7 participants; 10 targets

Immunochemistry none

Response

Page 7: Interlaboratory study animal proteins in feed 2013 v2

Ring test animal proteins

Results

● Background of materials

● Accuracy fish

● Accuracy terrestrial animals

● Accuracy flotate or raw material

● Quantification

● Application of method parameters

● Results of PCR

● Evaluation

Page 8: Interlaboratory study animal proteins in feed 2013 v2

Ring test animal proteins

0.96

0.98

0.92

A: blank

B: 2 % fish

C: 0.05 % MBM

D: 0.1 % TCP

specificity sensitivity

0.98

Results fish

Page 9: Interlaboratory study animal proteins in feed 2013 v2

Ring test animal proteins

0.94

0.98

specificity sensitivity

1.0

0.92 *

Results terrestrial animals

A: blank

B: 2 % fish

C: 0.05 % MBM

D: 0.1 % TCP

*: EU member states only: 0.98

Page 10: Interlaboratory study animal proteins in feed 2013 v2

Ring test animal proteins

TCP identification

Page 11: Interlaboratory study animal proteins in feed 2013 v2

Ring test animal proteins

0.91

specificity sensitivity

0.83

0.34

0.68

Results flotate or raw sample material (target: animal material in general)

A: blank

B: 2 % fish

C: 0.05 % MBM

D: 0.1 % TCP

Page 12: Interlaboratory study animal proteins in feed 2013 v2

Ring test animal proteins

Method application

● Tendency to make smaller slides (small cover glass: n=38)

● Increasing use of special glass with cock

● Decreasing use of staining of sediment

● Unchanged frequency of using a binocular

● Amount of sediment used: 1 – 100 %

Page 13: Interlaboratory study animal proteins in feed 2013 v2

Ring test animal proteins

10 gram of material

200 milligram sediment

20 mg

Examination:

20 mg

1

gr

Example: 0.05% 20 particles

20 p

Result: positive

2 p

Result: suspect

Amount of sediment used

Page 14: Interlaboratory study animal proteins in feed 2013 v2

Ring test animal proteins

1.0

1.0

0.81

< 50% >= 50%

n=14 n=24

1.0

1.0

1.0

A: blank

B: 2 % fish

C: 0.05 % MBM

D: 0.1 % TCP *

*: p = 0.053

Amount of sediment used: sensitivity

Page 15: Interlaboratory study animal proteins in feed 2013 v2

Ring test animal proteins

Recommendations

● Improvement of examination of flotate or raw

material

● Method: full application

● Harmonisation of the method

● Further attention to detection of TCP

Page 16: Interlaboratory study animal proteins in feed 2013 v2

Ring test animal proteins

Thanks to:

● All participants of the study

● IAG board for cooperation

Page 17: Interlaboratory study animal proteins in feed 2013 v2

Thank you for

your attention

Questions?


Recommended