1 \ 168
Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection and
Committee on Legal Affairs
- Secretariat -
Version 1.1
17/11/2017
DM/BL/CP/ZV/ds
Vu: PK and EW
FINAL VOTING LIST
on the Draft Report
on the contracts for the supply of digital content
2015/0287(COD) - COM(2015)0634
Rapporteurs: E. Gebhardt - A. Voss
Abbreviations:
CA Compromise amendment
OA Oral amendment
cp Corresponding part
WD Withdrawn
2 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
Note: The adopted text may be subject after the vote to technical adaptations to ensure coherence
Titles
Title 1 1 Rapporteurs
Identical. Put to vote together
HORIZONTAL AMENDMENT If adopted, “or digital services” will be
added throughout the text
71 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
72 Marco Zullo
Articles
Article -1 +
Article 3 –
paragraph 8
CA
1
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
GUE, Greens, EFDD +
If adopted, Article -1 on data protection
will be introduced and paragraph 8 of
Article 3 will be deleted
If adopted, go to CA 4
Article 1
CA
4
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
GUE, Greens, EFDD +
If adopted/rejected, CAs 5 until 11 are
deemed adopted/rejected
If adopted, go to CA 12
366 Marlene Mizzi Falls if CA 4 is adopted
365 Eva Maydell, Andreas
Schwab
Falls if CA 4 or AM 366 is adopted
20 Rapporteurs Falls if CA 4 or AM 365 or 366 is adopted
367 Antanas Guoga
Falls if CA 4 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
368 Daniel Buda
Falls if CA 4 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
369 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Olga Sehnalová, Lucy
Anderson, Christel
Schaldemose, Anna
Hedh, Josef
Weidenholzer, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Marc
Falls if CA 4 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
3 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
Tarabella, Catherine
Stihler, Evelyn Regner
370 Virginie Rozière
Falls if CA 4 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
371 Marco Zullo
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
horizontal AMs 1/71/72
Article 2 –
paragraph 1 –
points 1 and
1a (new)
CA
12
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
GUE, Greens, EFDD +
If adopted, go to CA 13
Article 2 –
point 1
21 Rapporteurs
Deletion
Falls if CA 12 is adopted
Article 2 –
paragraph 1 –
point 1 –
introductory
part
372 Virginie Rozière
Deletion
Falls if CA 12 or AM 21 is adopted
Article 2 –
paragraph 1 –
point 1 – point
a
373 Virginie Rozière
Deletion
Falls if CA 12 or AM 21 is adopted
374 Constance Le Grip
Identical. Put to vote together
Falls if CA 12 or AM 21 or 373 is adopted
375 Antanas Guoga
377 Daniel Buda
Falls if CA 12 or AM 21, 373 or 374/375
is adopted
376 Philippe Juvin
Falls if CA 12 or AM 21 or any of the
above AMs is adopted
15 LIBE
Falls if CA 12 or AM 21 or any of the
above AMs is adopted
Article 2 –
point 1 a (new)
16 LIBE
Falls if CA 12 is adopted
Article 2 – 378 Virginie Rozière Deletion
4 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
paragraph 1 –
point 1 – point
b
379 Daniel Buda
Identical. Put to vote together
Fall if CA 12 or AM 21 is adopted
380 Marco Zullo
381 Julia Reda
382 Antanas Guoga
Falls if CA 12 or AM 21 or
378/379/380/381 is adopted
Article 2 –
paragraph 1 –
point 1 – point
c
383 Virginie Rozière
Deletion
Identical. Put to vote together
Fall if CA 12 or AM 21 is adopted
384 Daniel Buda
385 Marco Zullo
386 Julia Reda
387 Antanas Guoga
Falls if CA 12 or AM 21 or
383/384/385/386 is adopted
Article 2 –
paragraph 1 –
point 1 a (new)
391 Virginie Rozière Falls if CA 12 is adopted
388 Marco Zullo Falls if CA 12 or AM 391 is adopted
22 Rapporteurs
Falls if CA 12 or AM 391 or 388 is
adopted
389 Daniel Buda
Falls if CA 12 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
390 Julia Reda
Falls if CA 12 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
Article 2 –
paragraph 1 –
point 1b (new)
CA
13
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
GUE, Greens, EFDD +
If adopted, go to CA 17
Article 2 –
paragraph 1 –
point 1 a (new)
392 Daniel Dalton, Vicky
Ford
Falls if CA 13 is adopted
Article 2 –
paragraph 1 –
point 2 a (new)
398 Marietje Schaake Falls if CA 13 or AM 392 is adopted
24 Rapporteurs Identical. Put to the vote together
5 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
Article 2 –
paragraph 1 –
point 1 b (new)
394 Virginie Rozière
Fall if CA 13 or AM 392 or 398 is adopted
Article 2 –
paragraph 1 –
point 2 a (new)
393 Róza Gräfin von Thun
und Hohenstein,
Tadeusz Zwiefka
Identical. Put to the vote together
Fall if CA 13 or AM 392, 398 or 24/394 is
adopted
397 Eva Maydell, Andreas
Schwab
399 Julia Reda, Kaja
Kallas
Falls if CA 13 or AM 392, 398, 24/394 or
393/397 is adopted
Article 2 –
point 2
CA
17
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
GUE, Greens, EFDD
+
If adopted, go to CA 18
23 Rapporteurs Falls if CA 17 is adopted
395 Marco Zullo Falls if CA 17 or AM 23 is adopted
396 Antanas Guoga Falls if CA 17 or AM 23 or 395 is adopted
Article 2 –
paragraph 1 –
points 3 and 4
CA
18
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
Greens, GUE +
If adopted, go to CA 20
Note: if adopted, ‘supplier’ will be
changed into ‘trader’ throughout the text
Article 2 –
paragraph 1 –
point 3
402 Constance Le Grip Falls if CA 18 is adopted
400 Daniel Dalton, Vicky
Ford
Falls if CA 18 or AM 402 is adopted
25 Rapporteurs
Identical. Put to vote together
Falls if CA 18 or AM 402 or 400 is
adopted
401 Antanas Guoga
403 Dennis de Jong
Falls if CA 18 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
Article 2 – 26 Rapporteurs Falls if CA 18 is adopted
6 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
paragraph 1 –
point 4
404 Antanas Guoga
Falls if CA 18 is adopted
Compatible with AM 26: put to vote as an
addition
405 Julia Reda
Falls if CA 18 is adopted
Compatible with AMs 26 and 404: put to
vote as an addition
Article 2 –
paragraph 1 –
point 5
CA
20
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
GUE, Greens, EFDD
+
If adopted, go to CA 21
406 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell Deletion
Falls if CA 20 is adopted
409 Virginie Rozière Falls if CA 20 or AM 406 is adopted
410 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Nicola Danti, Marc
Tarabella, Catherine
Stihler, Evelyn Regner
Identical. Put to vote together
Fall if CA 20 or AM 406 or 409 is adopted
17 LIBE
408 Antanas Guoga
Falls if CA 20 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
407 Julia Reda
Falls if CA 20 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
Article 2 –
paragraph 1 –
point 6
CA
21
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
GUE, Greens, EFDD
+
If adopted, go to AM 420
411 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell Deletion
Falls if CA 21 is adopted
412 Marlene Mizzi Falls if CA 21 or AM 411 is adopted
413 Antanas Guoga
Falls if CA 21 or AM 411 or 412 is
adopted
7 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
414 Marco Zullo
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
horizontal AM 1/71/72
Article 2 –
paragraph 1 –
point 6 a (new)
416 Marlene Mizzi
Falls if CA 1 is adopted
If adopted, go to 419
415 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
Identical. Put to vote together
Falls if CA 1 or 416 is adopted
If adopted, go to 419
417 Julia Reda
418 Antanas Guoga
Article 2 –
paragraph 1 –
point 6 a (new)
419 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Kerstin Westphal,
Marlene Mizzi, Josef
Weidenholzer, Lucy
Anderson, Christel
Schaldemose, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Anna
Hedh, Nicola Danti,
Marc Tarabella,
Catherine Stihler,
Evelyn Regner
Falls if CA 1 is adopted
Compatible with the above AMs: put to
vote
[Note: If adopted, and any of the above
AMs is also adopted, AM 419 will become
point 6 b (new)]
Article 2 –
paragraph 1 –
point 7
420 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
Deletion
If adopted, go to CA 22
If adopted, the words “the definition of a
contract under” will be deleted in CA 23
Article 2 –
paragraph 1 –
point 8
CA
22
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
Greens, EFDD
+
If adopted, go to CA 43
425 Kaja Kallas, Dita
Charanzová
Falls if CA 22 is adopted
422 Antanas Guoga Falls if CA 22 or AM 425 is adopted
27 Rapporteurs
Identical. Put to vote together
423 Julia Reda
8 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
424 Daniel Dalton, Vicky
Ford
Falls if CA 22 or AM 420 or 425 is
adopted
421 Marco Zullo
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
horizontal AMs 1/71/72
Article 2 –
paragraph 1 –
point 9
(definition of
‘interoperability
’)
CA
43
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
GUE, Greens, EFDD
+
If adopted, go to AM 434
28
Rapporteurs
Deletion.
Identical. Put to vote together
Falls if CA 43 is adopted
426 Constance Le Grip
427 Lucy Anderson, Maria
Grapini, Marc
Tarabella, Afzal
Khan, Maria Arena,
Mary Honeyball,
Victor Negrescu
Falls if CA 43 or AM 28/426 is adopted
429 Philippe Juvin
Falls if CA 43 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
432 Jean-Marie Cavada
Falls if CA 43 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
428 Virginie Rozière
Falls if CA 43 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
431 Antanas Guoga
Falls if CA 43 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
430 Marco Zullo
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
horizontal AMs 1/71/72
Article 2 –
paragraph 1 –
point 9 a (new)
433 Virginie Rozière
Falls if CA 43 or AM 427, 429 or 432 is
adopted
Article 2 –
paragraph 1 –
point 9 a (new)
434 Philippe Juvin
Put to vote: compatible with CA 43
If adopted, go to 435
9 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
Article 2 –
paragraph 1 –
point 9 b (new)
435 Philippe Juvin
Put to vote: compatible with CA 43 and
AM 435
If adopted, go to CA 39
Article 2 –
paragraph 1 –
point 10
CA
39
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
GUE, Greens, EFDD
+
If adopted, go to AM 440
436 Constance Le Grip
Deletion
Falls if CA 39 is adopted
29 Rapporteurs
Identical.
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
horizontal AMs 1/71/72
438 Marco Zullo
439 Virginie Rozière
437 Daniel Buda
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
horizontal AMs 1/71/72
Article 2 –
paragraph 1 –
point 10 a
(new)
440 Victor Negrescu
If adopted, go to CA 24
Article 2 –
paragraph 1 –
point 11
441 Daniel Dalton, Vicky
Ford
Falls if CA 13 is adopted
Article 2 –
point 11 a
(new)
30 Rapporteurs
Falls if CA 13 is adopted
Article 3 –
paragraphs 1
and 4
CA
24
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
GUE
+
If adopted, go to CA 28
Article 3 –
paragraph 1
445 Angel Dzhambazki Falls if CA 24 is adopted
447 Daniel Dalton, Vicky
Ford
Falls if CA 24 or AM 445 is adopted
444 Vicky Ford WD
WITHDRAWN
10 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
Do not put to vote
31 Rapporteurs
Identical. Put to vote together
Fall if CA 24 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
446 Virginie Rozière
452 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Marlene Mizzi, Olga
Sehnalová, Josef
Weidenholzer,
Christel Schaldemose,
Anna Hedh, Lucy
Anderson, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Nicola
Danti, Marc Tarabella,
Catherine Stihler,
Evelyn Regner
Identical. Put to vote together
Fall if CA 24 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
453 Maria Grapini
449 Eva Maydell, Róza
Gräfin von Thun und
Hohenstein, Andreas
Schwab
Falls if CA 24 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
451 Jean-Marie Cavada
Falls if CA 24 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
442 Julia Reda
Falls if CA 24 or CA 1 or any of the above
AMs is adopted
18 LIBE
Falls if CA 24 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
454 Antanas Guoga
Identical. Put to vote together.
Fall if CA 24 or any of the other AMs
above is adopted
455 Kaja Kallas, Dita
Charanzová
456 Inese Vaidere
450 Marco Zullo
Falls if CA 24 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
11 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
443 Marietje Schaake
Falls if CA 24 or AM 447 is adopted
Compatible with any other AMs: put to
vote as addition
448 Daniel Buda
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
horizontal AMs 1/71/72
Article 3 –
paragraph 2
CA
28
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
GUE, Greens, EFDD +
If adopted, go to AM 460
If adopted/rejected, CA 29 is deemed
adopted/rejected
32 Rapporteurs
Identical. Put to vote together.
Fall if CA 28 is adopted
457 Marco Zullo
458 Virginie Rozière
459 Kaja Kallas, Dita
Charanzová
Falls if CA 28 or the above AMs is
adopted
Article 3 –
paragraph 2 a
(new)
460 Julia Reda
If adopted, go to CA 14
Article 3 –
paragraph 3
CA
14
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
GUE, Greens, EFDD
+
If adopted, go to CA 30
Article 3 –
paragraph 3
463 Róza Gräfin von Thun
und Hohenstein,
Tadeusz Zwiefka
Falls if CA 14 is adopted
33 Rapporteurs
Deletion.
Identical. Put to vote together
Fall if CA 14 is adopted
BLOCK VOTE. Put to vote together with
AMs 34/468/469 of the same authors
461 Virginie Rozière
462 Marco Zullo
464 Evelyne Gebhardt, Falls if CA 14 or any of the above Ams is
12 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
Axel Voss, Marlene
Mizzi, Lucy
Anderson, Christel
Schaldemose, Anna
Hedh, Josef
Weidenholzer, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Olga
Sehnalová, Nicola
Danti, Marc Tarabella,
Catherine Stihler,
Evelyn Regner
adopted
465 Antanas Guoga
Falls if CA 14 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
Article 3 –
paragraph 3 a
(new)
34 Rapporteurs
Identical.
Do not put to vote. Adopted/rejected with
AM 33/461/462
468 Virginie Rozière
469 Marco Zullo
466 Eva Maydell, Pascal
Arimont, Andreas
Schwab
Falls if CA 14 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
467 Andreas Schwab
Falls if CA 14 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
470 Róza Gräfin von Thun
und Hohenstein,
Tadeusz Zwiefka
Falls if CA 14 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
Article 3 –
paragraph 4
471 Eva Maydell, Róza
Gräfin von Thun und
Hohenstein
Deletion.
Falls if CA 24 is adopted
472 Antanas Guoga Falls if CA 24 or AM 471 is adopted
474 Kaja Kallas
Falls if CA 24 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
476 Dita Charanzová
Falls if CA 24 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
35 Rapporteurs Identical. Put to vote together
13 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
19 LIBE
Fall if CA 24 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
473 Angel Dzhambazki
Falls if CA 24 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
480 Virginie Rozière
Falls if CA 24 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
479 Daniel Dalton, Vicky
Ford
Falls if CA 24 or CA 1 or any of the above
AMs is adopted
477 Julia Reda
Falls if CA 24 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
475 Marco Zullo
Falls if CA 24 or AM 471, 472, 474 or 476
is adopted
Compatible with the other AMs, put to
vote as addition
478 Marco Zullo
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
horizontal AM 1/71/72
Article 3 –
paragraph 5
CA
30
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
GUE, Greens, EFDD
+
If adopted, go to AM 489
Article 3 –
paragraph 5 –
point a
481 Marco Zullo Falls if CA 30 is adopted
36 Rapporteurs Falls if CA 30 or AM 481 is adopted
483 Eva Maydell
Falls if CA 30 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
485 Antanas Guoga
Falls if CA 30 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
482 Andreas Schwab
Identical. put to vote together
Falls if CA 30 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
484 Daniel Buda
Article 3 – 486 Virginie Rozière Falls if CA 30 is adopted
14 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
paragraph 5 –
point a a (new)
Article 3 –
paragraph 5 –
point a b (new)
487 Virginie Rozière
Falls if CA 30 is adopted
Article 3 –
paragraph 5 –
point b
488 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Josef Weidenholzer,
Anna Hedh, Lucy
Anderson, Christel
Schaldemose, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Nicola
Danti, Marc Tarabella,
Catherine Stihler,
Evelyn Regner
Falls if CA 30 is adopted
Article 3 –
paragraph 5 –
point d
37 Rapporteurs
Falls if CA 30 is adopted
Article 3 –
paragraph 5 –
point e
38 Rapporteurs
Falls if CA 30 is adopted
Article 3 –
paragraph 5 a
(new)
490 Othmar Karas
Falls if CA 30 is adopted
If adopted, will become additional point in
paragraph 5
Article 3 –
paragraph 5 a
(new)
491 Philippe Juvin
Falls if CA 30 is adopted
If adopted, will become additional point in
paragraph 5
Article 3 –
paragraph 5 –
point e a (new)
489 Julia Reda, Dita
Charanzová, Kaja
Kallas
Put to vote as an addition to CA 30
If adopted, go to 492
Article 3 –
paragraph 5 a
(new)
492 Andreas Schwab
Falls if AM 490 is adopted
If adopted, go to CA 31
Article 3 –
paragraph 5 a 493 Daniel Buda
Falls if AM 490 or 492 is adopted
15 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
(new) If adopted, go to CA 31
Article 3 –
paragraph 6
CA
31
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
GUE, Greens, EFDD +
If adopted/rejected, CA 32 is deemed
adopted/rejected
If adopted, go to CA 33
495 Eva Maydell Falls if CA 31 is adopted
39 Rapporteurs Falls if CA 31 or AM 495 is adopted
494 Daniel Buda
Falls if CA 31 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
496 Antanas Guoga
Falls if CA 31 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
499 Jean-Marie Cavada
Falls if CA 31 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
497 Virginie Rozière
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
horizontal AMs 1/71/72
498 Marco Zullo
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
horizontal AMs 1/71/72
Article 3 –
paragraph 7
CA
33
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
GUE, Greens, EFDD
+
If adopted, go to CA 67
20 LIBE Falls if CA 33 is adopted
500 Eva Maydell Falls if CA 33 or LIBE 20 is adopted
40 Rapporteurs Identical. Put to vote together
Fall if CA 33 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
501 Antanas Guoga
Article 3 –
paragraph 8
503 Julia Reda
Identical. Put to vote together
Falls if CA 1 is adopted
21 LIBE
502 Maria Grapini Falls if CA 1 or any of the above AMs is
16 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
adopted
41 Rapporteurs
Falls if CA 1 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
504 Daniel Dalton, Vicky
Ford
Falls if CA 1 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
505 Eva Maydell, Andreas
Schwab
Falls if CA 1 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
506 Antanas Guoga
Falls if CA 1 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
Article 3 –
paragraph 9
CA
67
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, GUE,
Greens, EFDD
+
If adopted, CA 68 is deemed adopted
If adopted, go to 22 LIBE
42 Rapporteurs
Identical. Put to vote together
Falls if CA 67 is adopted
508 Eva Maydell
507 Daniel Buda
Falls if CA 67 is adopted
Compatible with the other AMs: put to
vote as an addition
Article 3 –
paragraph 9 a
(new)
22 LIBE
If adopted, go to CA 35
Article 4 CA
35
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, GUE,
Greens, EFDD +
If adopted, CAs 36 and 37 are deemed
adopted/rejected
If adopted, go to AM 516
509 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Maria Grapini, Josef
Weidenholzer, Anna
Hedh, Christel
Schaldemose, Lucy
Anderson, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Marc
Tarabella, Evelyn
Regner
Deletion
Identical. put to vote together
Falls if CA 35 is adopted
17 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
510 Mylène Troszczynski
511 Dennis de Jong
Falls if CA 35 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
512 Julia Reda
Falls if CA 35 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
514 Daniel Dalton, Vicky
Ford
Falls if CA 35 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
513 Daniel Buda
Falls if CA 35 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
Article 4 a
(new)
43 Rapporteurs
Identical. put to vote together
Fall if CA 1 is adopted
515 Marco Zullo
Article 4 a
(new) 516 Virginie Rozière
Compatible. Put to vote
If adopted, go to AM 517
Article 4 a
(new) 517 Philippe Juvin
Compatible. Put to vote
If adopted, go to CA 38
Article 5 –
title
CA
38
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
GUE, Greens, EFDD +
If adopted/rejected, CA 40 is deemed
adopted/rejected
If adopted, go to CAs 40bis/CA 41/CA42
44 Rapporteurs
Identical.
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
horizontal AMs 1/71/72
519 Eva Maydell
520 Marco Zullo
518 Daniel Buda
521 Virginie Rozière
Article 5 –
paragraph 1 –
524 Constance Le Grip
BLOCK VOTE with AMs 526 and 527
18 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
introductory
part
Falls if CA 38 is adopted
45 Rapporteurs
Falls if CA 38 or AMs 524/526/527 are
adopted
523 Marco Zullo
Identical.
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
horizontal AMs 1/71/72
522 Daniel Buda
525 Virginie Rozière
Article 5 –
paragraph 1 –
point a
526 Constance Le Grip
Deletion
Do not put to vote: adopted rejected with
AM 524 (BLOCK VOTE)
46 Rapporteur
Falls if CA 38 or AMs 524/526/527 are
adopted
Article 5 –
paragraph 1 –
point b
527 Constance Le Grip
Deletion
Do not put to vote: adopted rejected with
AM 524 (BLOCK VOTE)
47 Rapporteurs
Falls if CA 38 or AMs 524/526/527 are
adopted
528 Daniel Buda
Identical.
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
horizontal AMs 1/71/72
529 Marco Zullo
530 Marco Zullo Do not put to vote. Technical AM
Article 5 –
paragraph 1 –
point b a (new)
48 Rapporteurs
Identical. Put to vote together
Fall if CA 38 or AMs 524/526/527 are
adopted
531 Marco Zullo
Article 5 –
paragraph 2
532 Constance Le Grip Falls if CA 38 is adopted
49 Rapporteurs
Identical. Put to vote together
Falls if CA 38 or AM 532 is adopted
533 Eva Maydell
534 Daniel Buda Falls if CA 38 or any of the above AMs is
19 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
adopted
536 Marco Zullo
Falls if CA 38 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
535 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Marlene Mizzi, Josef
Weidenholzer, Lucy
Anderson, Christel
Schaldemose, Anna
Hedh, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Maria
Grapini, Marc
Tarabella, Catherine
Stihler, Evelyn Regner
Falls if CA 38 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
537 Antanas Guoga
Identical. Put to vote together
Falls if CA 38 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
538 Kaja Kallas, Dita
Charanzová
23 LIBE
Falls if CA 38 is adopted
Compatible with any of the above AMs:
put to vote as an addition
Article 5 –
paragraph 2 a
(new)
539 Virginie Rozière
Falls if CA 38 or LIBE 23 is adopted
Article 5 –
paragraph 2 a
(new)
540 Jean-Marie Cavada,
Kaja Kallas
Falls if CA 38 is adopted
Compatible with the above AMs
Article 5a
(new)
+
Article 6
+
Article 6a
(new)
CA 40bis
+
CA
41
+
CA
42
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
GUE, Greens, EFDD
+
Vote together as a BLOCK
If adopted/rejected, CAs 44 until 49 are
deemed adopted/rejected
If adopted, go to CA 50
Article 5a 50 Rapporteurs Identical. Put to vote together
20 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
(new) pc 1
Falls if CAs 40bis/41/42 are adopted
pc 1 concerns the title “Conformity of
...with the contract”
BLOCK VOTE on restructuration of
conformity requirements: put to vote
together
AMs 50 pc 1/541 pc 1, 51,
56/569/570/571, 57, 58/589, 59, 60 pc 1,
601 pc 1
If adopted, text will be restructured: Art.
5a (new) chapeau article, + Art. 6 + Art.
6a
541
pc 1
Evelyne Gebhardt,
Lucy Anderson, Anna
Hedh, Christel
Schaldemose, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Josef
Weidenholzer, Maria
Grapini, Marc
Tarabella, Catherine
Stihler, Evelyn Regner
541
pc 2
Evelyne Gebhardt,
Lucy Anderson, Anna
Hedh, Christel
Schaldemose, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Josef
Weidenholzer, Maria
Grapini, Marc
Tarabella, Catherine
Stihler, Evelyn Regner
Put to vote
Falls if CAs 40bis/41/42 are adopted
Pc 2 concerns the text of the article: “In
order to confirm ... within a reasonable
timeframe”
50
pc 2
Rapporteurs
Falls if CAs 40bis/41/42 or AM 541 pc 2 is
adopted
Pc 2 concerns the text of the article: “In
order to confirm ... Articles 6, 6a, 7 and 8”
Article 6 – title 51 Rapporteurs
Do not put to vote:
adopted/rejected with BLOCK VOTE on
restructuration of conformity requirements
546 Daniel Dalton, Vicky
Ford
Falls if BLOCK VOTE on restructuration
of conformity requirements is adopted
542 Daniel Buda
Identical.
543 Eva Maydell
21 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
544 Marco Zullo Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
horizontal AMs 1/71/72 545 Virginie Rozière
Article 6 –
paragraph -1
(new)
547 Virginie Rozière
Falls if CAs 40bis/41/42 are adopted
Article 6 –
paragraph 1 –
introductory
part
Subjective
conformity
requirements
548 Julia Reda
Identical. Put to vote together
Fall if CAs 40bis/41/42 or CA 1 are
adopted
24 LIBE
552 Virginie Rozière
Falls if CAs 40bis/41/42 are adopted
Compatible: put to the vote as addition
551 Antanas Guoga
Falls if CAs 40bis/41/42 are adopted
Compatible: put to the vote as addition
52 Rapporteurs
Identical.
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
horizontal AMs 1/71/72
549 Daniel Buda
550 Marco Zullo
Article 6 –
paragraph 1 –
point a
554 Virginie Rozière
Falls if CAs 40bis/41/42 are adopted
557 Jean-Marie Cavada
Falls if CAs 40bis/41/42 or AM 554 is
adopted
558 Constance Le Grip
Falls if CAs 40bis/41/42 or any of the
above AMs is adopted
556 Philippe Juvin
Falls if CAs 40bis/41/42 or any of the
above AMs is adopted
53 Rapporteurs
Identical. Put to vote together
Falls if CAs 40bis/41/42 or AM 554 or 556
is adopted
Compatible with the other AMs: put to
vote as an addition
555 Maria Grapini
22 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
553 Marco Zullo
Falls if CAs 40bis/41/42 or AM 554 is
adopted
Compatible with the other AMs: put to
vote as addition
Article 6 –
paragraph 1 –
point b
559 Daniel Dalton, Vicky
Ford
Falls if CAs 40bis/41/42 are adopted
Falls if BLOCK VOTE on restructuration
of conformity requirements is adopted
(Subjective and objective conformity
requirements)
560 Virginie Rozière
Falls if CAs 40bis/41/42 or AM 559 is
adopted
Article 6 –
paragraph 1 –
point b a (new)
561 Julia Reda
Falls if CAs 40bis/41/42 are adopted
If BLOCK VOTE on restructuration of
conformity requirements is adopted, to be
included in the objective requirements
(Objective conformity requirements)
562 Virginie Rozière
Falls if CAs 40bis/41/42 or AM 561 is
adopted
If BLOCK VOTE on restructuration of
conformity requirements is adopted, to be
included in the objective requirements
(Objective conformity requirements)
54 Rapporteurs
Falls if CAs 40bis/41/42 are adopted
Compatible with the above AMs. Put to the
vote
Article 6 –
paragraph 1 –
point b b (new)
563 Virginie Rozière
Falls if CAs 40bis/41/42 or AM 561 is
adopted
If BLOCK VOTE on restructuration of
conformity requirements is adopted, to be
included in the objective requirements
23 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
(Objective conformity requirements)
Article 6 –
paragraph 1 –
point c
564 Eva Maydell
Deletion
Falls if CAs 40bis/41/42 are adopted
565 Marco Zullo
Falls if CAs 40bis/41/42 or AM 564 is
adopted
Article 6 –
paragraph 1 –
point d
566 Eva Maydell
Deletion
Falls if CAs 40bis/41/42 are adopted
25 LIBE
Falls if CAs 40bis/41/42 or AM 566 is
adopted
567 Virginie Rozière
Falls if CAs 40bis/41/42 or AMs 25 or 566
is adopted
Article 6 –
paragraph 1 –
point d a (new)
568 Maria Grapini
Falls if CAs 40bis/41/42 are adopted
If BLOCK VOTE on restructuration of
conformity requirements is adopted, to be
included in the objective requirements
Article 6 –
paragraph 2
56 Rapporteurs
Deletion.
Do not put to vote:
adopted/rejected with BLOCK VOTE on
restructuration of conformity requirements
Article 6 –
paragraph 2
569 Virginie Rozière
Article 6 –
paragraph 2
570 Marco Zullo
Article 6 –
paragraph 2
571 Eva Maydell
Article 6 –
paragraph 2 –
introductory
part
26 LIBE
Falls if CAs 40bis/41/42 are adopted
Falls if BLOCK VOTE on restructuration
of conformity requirements is adopted
24 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
572 Kaja Kallas, Dita
Charanzová
Falls if CAs 40bis/41/42 are adopted
Falls if BLOCK VOTE on restructuration
of conformity requirements or AM 561,
563 or 568 is adopted
573 Antanas Guoga
Falls if CAs 40bis/41/42 are adopted
Falls if BLOCK VOTE on restructuration
of conformity requirements or AM 561,
563, 568 or 572 is adopted
574 Constance Le Grip
Falls if CAs 40bis/41/42 are adopted
Falls if BLOCK VOTE on restructuration
of conformity requirements is adopted
Compatible with the above AMs: put to
vote as addition
Article 6 –
paragraph 2 –
point a
575 Birgit Collin-Langen Deletion. put to vote together
Falls if CAs 40bis/41/42 are adopted
576 Antanas Guoga
577 Julia Reda
27 LIBE
Falls if CAs 40bis/41/42 or AM
575/576/577 is adopted
If BLOCK VOTE on restructuration of
conformity requirements is adopted, will
be moved to Article 6a (new)
578 Lucy Anderson, Maria
Grapini, Marc
Tarabella, Marlene
Mizzi, Afzal Khan,
Maria Arena, Mary
Honeyball, Victor
Negrescu
Compatible. Put to vote
Falls if CAs 40bis/41/42 are adopted
Content different than actual point a; vote
as additional point
Article 6 –
paragraph 2 –
point a a (new)
28 LIBE
Falls if AM 561, 563, 568, 572 or 573 is
adopted
If BLOCK VOTE on restructuration of
25 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
conformity requirements is adopted, will
be moved to Article 6a (new)
Article 6 –
paragraph 2 –
point b
579 Julia Reda
Deletion
Do not put to vote. Adopted/rejected with
AM 561
Article 6 –
paragraph 2 –
point b
580 Marlene Mizzi
Falls if CAs 40bis/41/42 or AM 579 is
adopted
Article 6 –
paragraph 2 –
point b
29 LIBE
Falls if CAs 40bis/41/42 are adopted
Compatible with 580. Put to vote as an
addition
Article 6 –
paragraph 2 –
point b a (new)
30 LIBE
Falls if CAs 40bis/41/42 are adopted
Article 6 –
paragraph 2 –
point c – point
i
581 Julia Reda
Deletion
Do not put to vote. Adopted/rejected with
AM 561
Article 6 –
paragraph 2 –
point c – point
ii
582 Julia Reda
Deletion
Do not put to vote. Adopted/rejected with
AM 561
Article 6 –
paragraph 2 –
point c – point
iii
583 Julia Reda
Deletion
Do not put to vote. Adopted/rejected with
AM 561
Article 6 –
paragraph 3
57 Rapporteurs
Deletion
Do not put to vote:
adopted/rejected with BLOCK VOTE on
restructuration of conformity requirements
584 Andreas Schwab
Falls if CAs 40bis/41/42 are adopted
If BLOCK VOTE on restructuration of
26 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
conformity requirements is adopted, will
be moved to Article 5a (new)
585 Julia Reda Identical. Put to vote together.
Fall if CAs 40bis/41/42 are adopted
AMs compatible with AM 584: put to vote
as an addition
If BLOCK VOTE on restructuration of
conformity requirements is adopted, will
be moved to Article 5a (new)
31 LIBE
586 Eva Maydell
Identical.
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
horizontal AMs 1/71/72
587 Marco Zullo
Article 6 –
paragraph 3 –
point 1 (new)
588 Marietje Schaake
Falls if CAs 40bis/41/42 or AM 584 is
adopted
If BLOCK VOTE on restructuration of
conformity requirements is adopted, will
be moved to Article 5a (new)
Article 6 –
paragraph 4
58 Rapporteurs
Deletion
Identical
Do not put to vote:
adopted/rejected with BLOCK VOTE on
restructuration of conformity requirements
589 Eva Maydell
590 Kaja Kallas, Dita
Charanzová Deletion
Falls if CAs 40bis/41/42 are adopted
591 Julia Reda
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
horizontal AMs 1/71/72
Article 6 –
paragraph 4 a
(new)
592 Jean-Marie Cavada
Falls if CAs 40bis/41/42 are adopted
27 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
Article 6 –
paragraph 5
59 Rapporteurs
Deletion
Do not put to vote:
adopted/rejected with BLOCK VOTE on
restructuration of conformity requirements
Article 6 –
paragraph 5
596 Philippe Juvin
Identical. put to vote together
Falls if CAs 40bis/41/42 or any of the
above AMs is adopted
Article 6 –
paragraph 5
597 Constance Le Grip
Article 6 –
paragraph 5
598 Jean-Marie Cavada
Article 6 –
paragraph 5
593 Julia Reda
Falls if CAs 40bis/41/42 or CA 1 is
adopted
Put to vote as an addition to the above
AMs
If BLOCK VOTE on restructuration of
conformity requirements is adopted, will
be moved to Article 5a (new)
Article 6 –
paragraph 5
594 Eva Maydell
Identical.
Do not put to vote:
adopted/rejected with BLOCK VOTE on
restructuration of conformity requirements
Article 6 –
paragraph 5
595 Marco Zullo
Article 6 –
paragraph 5 a
(new)
599 Tadeusz Zwiefka,
Róza Gräfin von Thun
und Hohenstein
Falls if CAs 40bis/41/42 or AM 55 is
adopted
Article 6 –
paragraph 5 a
(new)
32 LIBE
Falls if CAs 40bis/41/42 are adopted
(GDPR)
Article 6 a
(new)
60
pc 1
Rapporteurs
Identical.
Do not put to vote:
adopted/rejected with BLOCK VOTE on
restructuration of conformity requirements
601
pc 1
Eva Maydell
28 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
Pc 1 concerns the title: “Objective
requirements for conformity with the
contract”
60
pc 2
Rapporteurs
Falls if CAs 40bis/41/42 or AM 561 is
adopted
Pc 2 concerns the text of the entire article:
“1. The digital content ... 4. ... reasonable
timeframe”
601
pc 2
Eva Maydell
Falls if CAs 40bis/41/42 or AM 561 or 60
pc 2 is adopted
600 Marco Zullo
Falls if CAs 40bis/41/42 or AM 561, 60 pc
2 or 601 pc 2 is adopted
Article 7 CA
50
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
GUE, Greens, EFDD +
If adopted/rejected, CA 51 is deemed
adopted/rejected
If adopted, go to AM 614
Article 7 – title 602 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
horizontal AMs 1/71/72
Article 7 –
paragraph 1 –
introductory
part
605 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
Identical. Put to vote together
Falls if CA 50 is adopted
604 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Nicola Danti, Josef
Weidenholzer,
Christel Schaldemose,
Lucy Anderson, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Anna
Hedh, Marc Tarabella,
Evelyn Regner
603 Marco Zullo
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
horizontal AM 1/71/72
Article 7 –
paragraph 1 –
point a
606 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
Identical.
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
horizontal AM 1/71/72
607 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Nicola Danti, Josef
29 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
Weidenholzer, Anna
Hedh, Lucy Anderson,
Christel Schaldemose,
Liisa Jaakonsaari,
Marc Tarabella,
Evelyn Regner
608 Marco Zullo
Article 7 –
paragraph 1 –
point b
609 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
Do not put to vote. Technical adjustment
to restructuration
610 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Nicola Danti, Lucy
Anderson, Anna
Hedh, Christel
Schaldemose, Josef
Weidenholzer, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Marc
Tarabella, Evelyn
Regner
Do not put to vote. Technical adjustment
to restructuration
611 Julia Reda
Do not put to vote. Technical adjustment
to restructuration
612 Marco Zullo
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
horizontal AMs 1/71/72
Article 7 –
paragraph 1 –
subparagraph 2
(new)
613 Jean-Marie Cavada
Falls if CA 50 is adopted
Article 7 a
(new) 614 Philippe Juvin
If adopted, go to CA 52
Article 8 CA
52
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
GUE, EFDD +
If adopted/rejected, CA 53 is deemed
adopted/rejected
If adopted, go to AM 630
Article 8 –
paragraph 1
616 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
Identical. Put to vote together
Fall if CA 52 is adopted
617 Evelyne Gebhardt,
30 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
Marlene Mizzi, Olga
Sehnalová, Anna
Hedh, Lucy Anderson,
Christel Schaldemose,
Liisa Jaakonsaari,
Josef Weidenholzer,
Marc Tarabella,
Catherine Stihler,
Evelyn Regner
615 Angelika Niebler
Falls if CA 52 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
618 Philippe Juvin
Falls if CA 52 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
620 Angel Dzhambazki
Falls if CA 52 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
621 Constance Le Grip
Falls if CA 52 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
622 Jean-Marie Cavada
Falls if CA 52 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
619 Marco Zullo
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
horizontal AMs 1/71/72
Article 8 –
paragraph 2
623 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell Deletion
Falls if CA 52 is adopted
625 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Josef Weidenholzer,
Anna Hedh, Christel
Schaldemose, Lucy
Anderson, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Marc
Tarabella, Evelyn
Regner
Falls if CA 52 or AM 623 is adopted
624 Philippe Juvin
Identical. Put to vote together
Fall if CA 52 or AM 623 or 625 is adopted
629 Jean-Marie Cavada
31 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
628 Constance Le Grip
627 Angel Dzhambazki
Falls if CA 52 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
626 Marco Zullo
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
horizontal AMs 1/71/72
Article 8 –
paragraph 2 a
(new)
630 Julia Reda
Compatible with CA 52
If adopted, go to CA 54
Article 8a
(new)
CA
54
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
GUE, EFDD
+
If adopted, go to AM 631
Article 6 –
paragraph 1 a
(new)
55 Rapporteurs
Falls if CA 54 is adopted
Article 8 a
(new) 631 Marco Zullo
If adopted, go to AM 634
632 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
Falls if AM 631 is adopted
If adopted, go to 634
633 Dennis de Jong
Falls if AMs 631 or 632 is adopted
If adopted, go to 634
Article 8 a
(new) 634 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Biljana Borzan, Marc
Tarabella, Catherine
Stihler, Evelyn Regner
If adopted, go to AM 635
Article 8 b
(new) 635 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Kerstin Westphal,
Nicola Danti, Virginie
Rozière, Maria
Grapini, Olga
Sehnalová, Josef
Weidenholzer,
If adopted, go to CA 58
32 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
Christel Schaldemose,
Anna Hedh, Lucy
Anderson, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Biljana
Borzan, Marc
Tarabella, Catherine
Stihler, Evelyn Regner
Article 9 CA
58
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR
+
Block Vote with CA 59 and CA 60
If adopted, go to AM 657
Note: if adopted, this will become Article
10.
Article 9 CA
58a
Supported by Greens
and GUE
Falls if CA 58 is adopted
Alternative compromise: same text as
CA 58 without paragraph 1b
Block Vote with CA 59a and CA 60
If adopted, go to AM 657
Note: if adopted, a two-year period for all
types of digital content will apply
Article 9 636 Angelika Niebler
Falls if CA 55/CA
58, 58a or AM 633 is adopted.
Block Vote with AMs 661 and 683.
Deletion.
Article 9 –
paragraph 1
637 Dennis de Jong
Do not put to vote - deemed
adopted/rejected with the
adoption/rejection of AM 633.
638 Dietmar Köster
Falls if CA 58, 58a /AM 633/AM 636 is
adopted.
If adopted, go to AM 646.
643 Lara Comi, Elisabetta
Gardini, Stefano
Maullu
Falls if any of the above AMs or CA 58,
58a is adopted.
33 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
If adopted, go to AM 646.
644 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
Falls if any of the above AMs or CA 58,
58a is adopted.
If adopted, go to AM 646.
639 Kaja Kallas, Dita
Charanzová, Jean-
Marie Cavada
Falls if any of the above AMs or CA 58,
58a is adopted.
If adopted, go to AM 645.
640 Lambert van
Nistelrooij
Falls if CA 58, 58a or AMs
636/638/643/644/639 is adopted.
Compatible with AM 637 If adopted, go to AM 646.
641 Birgit Collin-Langen
Falls if CA 58, 58a or AMs
636/638/643/644/639/640 is adopted.
Compatible with AM 637 If adopted, go to AM 646.
642 Andreas Schwab
Falls if CA 58, 58a or AMs
636/638/643/644/639/640/641 is adopted.
Compatible with AM 637 If adopted, go to AM 646.
645 Antanas Guoga
Falls if any of AMs 636/638/643/644 or
CA 58, 58a is adopted.
Compatible with AM 637/639/640-642
Article 9 –
paragraph 1 a
(new)
646 Lara Comi, Elisabetta
Gardini, Stefano
Maullu
Falls if AM 636 or CA 58, 58a is adopted.
Article 9 –
paragraph 1 b
(new)
647 Lara Comi, Elisabetta
Gardini, Stefano
Maullu
Falls if AM 636/637/638/644 or CA 58,
58a is adopted.
Article 9 –
paragraph 2
648 Angel Dzhambazki Falls if AM 636 or CA 58 , 58a is adopted.
653 Constance Le Grip
Falls if AM 636 or CA 58, 58a is adopted.
Compatible with AM 648
If adopted, go to AM 649.
650 Evelyne Gebhardt,
34 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
Nicola Danti, Josef
Weidenholzer, Lucy
Anderson, Christel
Schaldemose, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Anna
Hedh, Marc Tarabella,
Catherine Stihler,
Evelyn Regner
Identical
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
horizontal AMs 1/71/72.
651 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
652 Marco Zullo
654 Lara Comi, Elisabetta
Gardini, Stefano
Maullu
Do not put to vote - Adopted/rejected
with adoption/rejection of AM 647
649 Julia Reda Falls if AM 636 or CA 58, 58a is adopted.
Article 9 –
paragraph 3
655 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
Do not put to vote - Deemed
adopted/rejected with adoption/rejection of
AM 644.
656 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Marlene Mizzi, Nicola
Danti, Josef
Weidenholzer,
Christel Schaldemose,
Anna Hedh, Lucy
Anderson, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Marc
Tarabella, Catherine
Stihler, Evelyn Regner
Falls if CA 58, 58a is adopted.
If adopted, go to AM 659.
33 LIBE
Falls if any of the above AMs or CA 58 ,
58a is adopted.
If adopted, go to AM 658
658 Antanas Guoga
Falls if AM 655/656 or CA 58, 58a is
adopted.
659 Virginie Rozière
Falls if CA 58 , 58a is adopted.
Compatible with AM 657/656/655.
35 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
Article 9 a
(new)
660 Marco Zullo
Falls if CA 58, 58a is adopted.
Article 9 –
paragraph 3 657 Julia Reda
Compatible with CA 58 and CA 58a. Put
to vote as an addition.
If adopted, go to CA 55
Article 10 CA
55
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
GUE, Greens, EFDD +
Block Vote with CA 56/CA 57
If adopted, go to CA 61
Note: if adopted, this will become Article 9
Article 10 –
title
661 Angelika Niebler
Do not put to vote - adopted/rejected with
AM 636 (block vote)
Article 10 –
paragraph 1 –
introductory
part
662 Julia Reda
Falls if CA 55 is adopted.
Article 10 –
paragraph 1 –
point a
663 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
Falls if CA 55 is adopted.
Identical - put to vote together
664 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Liisa Jaakonsaari,
Lucy Anderson,
Christel Schaldemose,
Anna Hedh, Josef
Weidenholzer, Marc
Tarabella, Catherine
Stihler, Evelyn Regner
667 Daniel Buda
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
horizontal AMs 1/71/72.
666 Marco Zullo
665 Antanas Guoga Falls if AM 663/664 or CA 55 is adopted.
Article 10 –
paragraph 1 –
point b
668 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Lucy Anderson,
Christel Schaldemose,
Anna Hedh, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Josef
Falls if CA 55 or Block Vote on AM 636 is
adopted.
If adopted, go to AM 674.
36 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
Weidenholzer, Marc
Tarabella, Catherine
Stihler, Evelyn Regner
Identical
669 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
670 Kaja Kallas, Dita
Charanzová
Falls if 668/669, Block Vote on AM 636 or
CA 55 is adopted.
671 Daniel Buda
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
horizontal AMs 1/71/72.
672 Marco Zullo
673 Andreas Schwab
Falls if CA 55 is adopted.
Identical - put to vote together
34 LIBE
Article 10 –
paragraph 1 –
point b a (new)
674 Julia Reda
Falls if CA 55 is adopted.
Article 10 –
paragraph 1 –
point b b (new)
35 LIBE
Falls if AM 674 or CA 55 is adopted.
Article 10 –
paragraph 1 –
point c
675 Marlene Mizzi
Falls, if AM 668/669 or Block Vote on
AM 636 or CA 55 is adopted.
676 Kaja Kallas, Jean-
Marie Cavada, Dita
Charanzová
Falls if CA 55/CA 58, , 58a Block Vote on
AM 636, AM 668/669 is adopted.
678 Daniel Buda
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
horizontal AMs 1/71/72.
Identical
677 Marco Zullo
679 Andreas Schwab Falls, if AM 668/669 or CA 55 is adopted
Article 10 –
paragraph 1 –
point c a (new)
680 Antanas Guoga
Falls if CA 55 is adopted.
Article 10 – 681 Julia Reda Falls if CA 55 is adopted.
37 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
paragraph 1 –
point c b (new)
Article 10 –
paragraph 1 –
subparagraph
1a (new)
682 Julia Reda
Falls if CA 55 is adopted.
Article 10 –
paragraph 1 a
(new)
683 Angelika Niebler
Do not put to vote - adopted/rejected with
AM 636 (Block Vote)
Article 10 –
paragraph 1 a
(new)
684 Inese Vaidere
Falls if AM 643, 668-673, 675-679 or CA
55 or Block Vote on AM 636 are adopted.
Article 10 –
paragraph 1 b
(new)
685 Angel Dzhambazki
Falls if CA 55 is adopted.
Article 10 –
paragraph 1 c
(new)
686 Andreas Schwab
Falls if CA 55 is adopted.
Article 11 CA
61
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
GUE, EFDD
+
Block vote with CA 62
If adopted, go to CA 63
Article 11 687 Julia Reda
Falls if CA 61 is adopted.
Block Vote with AM
701/703/710/725/734/756
Deletion.
Article 11 –
title
688 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
Falls if CA 61 or block vote on AM 687 is
adopted.
Article 11 –
paragraph 1
689 Othmar Karas
Falls if CA 61 or block vote on AM 687 is
adopted
690 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
Falls if CA 61, block vote on AM 687 or
AM 689 is adopted
691 Antanas Guoga
Falls if CA 61, block vote on AM 687 or
689/690 is adopted
38 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
693 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Josef Weidenholzer,
Anna Hedh, Christel
Schaldemose, Lucy
Anderson, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Marc
Tarabella, Catherine
Stihler, Evelyn Regner
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
horizontal AMs 1/71/72.
Identical
692 Marco Zullo
Article 11 –
paragraph 1 a
(new)
694 Jean-Marie Cavada
Falls if CA 61 or block vote on AM 687 is
adopted.
Article 11 –
paragraph 1 b
(new)
695 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Marlene Mizzi, Maria
Grapini, Josef
Weidenholzer,
Christel Schaldemose,
Lucy Anderson, Anna
Hedh, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Marc
Tarabella, Catherine
Stihler, Evelyn Regner
Falls if CA 61 or block vote on AM 687 is
adopted.
Identical
Article 11 –
paragraph 1 c
(new)
696 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
Article 11 –
paragraph 1 d
(new)
697 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Marc Tarabella,
Evelyn Regner
Falls if CA 61 or AM 601, or or block vote
on AM 687 is adopted.
Block Vote with AM
699/700/732/737/740/744/746/750/755/76
9/845/AM 851
Article 11 –
paragraph 1 e
(new)
698 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
Falls if CA 61 or block vote on AM 697 is
adopted.
Block Vote with AM 846/ AM 850
Article 11 a
(new)
699 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Virginie Rozière,
Lucy Anderson, Olga
Do not put to vote - adopted/rejected with
AM 697 (Block Vote)
39 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
Sehnalová, Josef
Weidenholzer,
Christel Schaldemose,
Anna Hedh, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Marc
Tarabella, Catherine
Stihler, Evelyn Regner
Article 12 CA
63
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
GUE, EFDD
+
Block Vote with CA 64/ CA 65/ CA 66
If adopted, go to AM 768
Article 12 –
title
700 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Virginie Rozière,
Lucy Anderson, Olga
Sehnalová, Josef
Weidenholzer,
Christel Schaldemose,
Anna Hedh, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Marc
Tarabella, Catherine
Stihler, Evelyn Regner
Do not put to vote - adopted/rejected with
AM 697 (Block Vote)
701 Julia Reda
Do not put to vote -
adopted/rejected with AM 687 (Block
Vote)
702 Marco Zullo
Falls if CA 63 or block vote on AM 697 is
adopted.
Article 12 –
paragraph 1 –
subparagraph 1
703 Julia Reda
Do not put to vote - adopted/rejected with
AM 687 (Block Vote)
704 Marlene Mizzi
Falls if CA 63, block vote on AM 697 or
block vote on AM 698 is adopted.
705 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
Falls if any of the AMs, block vote on AM
698 or CA 63 are adopted.
706 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Virginie Rozière,
Lucy Anderson, Olga
Sehnalová, Josef
Weidenholzer,
Falls if any of the AMs, block vote on AM
698 or CA 63 are adopted.
Except: Compatible with AM 704
40 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
Christel Schaldemose,
Anna Hedh, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Marc
Tarabella, Catherine
Stihler, Evelyn Regner
707 Marco Zullo
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
horizontal AMs 1/71/72.
Article 12 –
paragraph 1 –
subparagraph 2
710 Julia Reda
Do not put to vote - adopted/rejected with
AM 687 (Block Vote)
Deletion
Article 12 –
paragraph 1 –
subparagraph 2
– introductory
part
708 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
Falls if any of the AMs 704-AM 707,
block vote on AM 687 or AM 698 or CA
63 are adopted.
709 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Lucy Anderson, Josef
Weidenholzer, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Christel
Schaldemose, Anna
Hedh, Marc Tarabella,
Catherine Stihler,
Evelyn Regner
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
horizontal AMs 1/71/72.
Identical
711 Marco Zullo
712 Angelika Niebler
Falls if CA 63, AM 708 or Block Vote on
AM 687 is adopted
Article 12 –
paragraph 1 –
subparagraph 2
– point a
713 Julia Reda
Falls if CA 63 is adopted.
Falls if Block Vote E is adopted.
Deletion - if adopted go to AM 718.
715 Andreas Schwab
Falls if CA 63, AM 713 /the horizontal
amendment or Block Vote on AM 687/697
is adopted.
Block Vote with AM 721, AM 736, AM
752.
717 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
Falls if any of the above AMs, CA 63 or
Block Vote on AM 687 is adopted.
41 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
714 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Lucy Anderson, Josef
Weidenholzer, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Christel
Schaldemose, Anna
Hedh, Marc Tarabella,
Catherine Stihler,
Evelyn Regner
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
horizontal AMs 1/71/72.
Identical
716 Marco Zullo
Article 12 –
paragraph 1 –
subparagraph 2
– point a a
(new)
718 Kaja Kallas, Dita
Charanzová
Falls if CA 63 or Block Vote on AM 687 is
adopted.
Article 12 –
paragraph 1 –
subparagraph 2
– point b
719 Julia Reda
Falls if CA 63 or Block Vote on AM
687/697 is adopted.
Deletion - if adopted go to AM 724.
720 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
Falls if AM 719, CA 63 or Block Vote on
AM is adopted
721 Andreas Schwab
Do not put to vote - adopted/rejected with
AM 715 (block vote)
722 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Lucy Anderson, Josef
Weidenholzer, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Christel
Schaldemose, Anna
Hedh, Marc Tarabella,
Catherine Stihler,
Evelyn Regner
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
horizontal AMs 1/71/72.
Identical
723 Marco Zullo
Article 12 –
paragraph 2
724 Othmar Karas
Falls if CA 63 or Block Vote on AM
687/697 is adopted.
725 Julia Reda
Do not put to vote - adopted/rejected with
AM 687 (block vote)
42 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
729 Marco Zullo Falls if CA 63 is adopted.
728 Virginie Rozière Falls if CA 63 or AM 729 is adopted.
726 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
horizontal AMs 1/71/72.
Identical
727 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Josef Weidenholzer,
Christel Schaldemose,
Lucy Anderson, Anna
Hedh, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Marc
Tarabella, Catherine
Stihler, Evelyn Regner
36 LIBE Falls if CA 63 is adopted.
Article 12 –
paragraph 2 a
(new)
730 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
Falls if CA 63,
AM 724 or block vote on AM 697 is
adopted.
Article 12 –
paragraph 2 b
(new)
731 Andreas Schwab
Falls if CA 63,
AM 724/ AM 730 or block vote on AM
697 is adopted.
Article 12 –
paragraph 3
733 Marco Zullo
Falls if CA 63, block votes on AM
697/687/715 is adopted.
Block Vote with AM 749 and 767
Deletion - if adopted, go to AM 749
734 Julia Reda
Do not put to vote - adopted/rejected with
AM 687 (block vote)
Deletion
Article 12 –
paragraph 3 –
introductory
part
732 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Lucy Anderson,
Christel Schaldemose,
Liisa Jaakonsaari,
Anna Hedh, Josef
Weidenholzer, Marc
Tarabella, Catherine
Stihler, Evelyn Regner
Do not put to vote - adopted/rejected with
AM 697 (block vote)
735 Axel Voss, Eva Falls if CA 63 or block votes on AM
43 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
Maydell 687/697 or AM 733 is adopted.
736 Andreas Schwab
Do not put to vote - adopted/rejected with
AM 715 (block vote).
Article 12 –
paragraph 3 –
point a
737 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Lucy Anderson, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Anna
Hedh, Josef
Weidenholzer,
Christel Schaldemose,
Marc Tarabella,
Catherine Stihler,
Evelyn Regner
Do not put to vote - adopted/rejected with
AM 697 (block vote)
Deletion
Identical
738 Julia Reda
739 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
Falls if CA 63, AM 738 or block votes
687/697 is adopted
Article 12 –
paragraph 3 –
point b
740 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Josef Weidenholzer,
Lucy Anderson,
Christel Schaldemose,
Anna Hedh, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Marc
Tarabella, Catherine
Stihler, Evelyn Regner
Do not put to vote - adopted/rejected with
AM 697 (block vote)
Deletion
Identical
741 Julia Reda
742 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
Falls if CA 63 or block vote on AM 697 is
adopted.
Article 12 –
paragraph 3 –
point c
744 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Josef Weidenholzer,
Lucy Anderson, Anna
Hedh, Christel
Schaldemose, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Marc
Tarabella, Catherine
Stihler, Evelyn Regner
Do not put to vote - adopted/rejected with
AM 697 (block vote)
Deletion
44 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
743 Julia Reda
Identical
745 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
horizontal AMs 1/71/72.
Article 12 –
paragraph 3 –
point d
746 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Lucy Anderson, Anna
Hedh, Christel
Schaldemose, Josef
Weidenholzer, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Marc
Tarabella, Catherine
Stihler, Evelyn Regner
Do not put to vote - adopted/rejected with
AM 697 (block vote)
Deletion
Identical
748 Julia Reda
747 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
horizontal AMs 1/71/72.
Article 12 –
paragraph 4
749 Marco Zullo
Do not put to vote - adopted/rejected with
AM 733 (block vote)
Deletion
750 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Josef Weidenholzer,
Lucy Anderson,
Christel Schaldemose,
Anna Hedh, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Marc
Tarabella, Catherine
Stihler, Evelyn Regner
Do not put to vote - adopted/rejected with
AM 697 (block vote)
Deletion
751 Lara Comi, Elisabetta
Gardini, Stefano
Maullu
Falls if CA 63 or block vote on AM 697 is
adopted.
752 Andreas Schwab
Do not put to vote - adopted/rejected with
AM 715 (block vote)
753 Julia Reda
Falls if CA 63,
AM 749 or block vote on AM 697 is
adopted
45 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
Compatible with AM 751
754 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
Falls if CA 63 is adopted.
Compatible with AM 751/753
Article 12 –
paragraph 5
755 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Josef Weidenholzer,
Lucy Anderson,
Christel Schaldemose,
Anna Hedh, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Marc
Tarabella, Catherine
Stihler, Evelyn Regner
Do not put to vote - adopted/rejected with
AM 697 (block vote)
Deletion
756 Julia Reda
Do not put to vote - adopted/rejected with
AM 687 (block vote)
757 Virginie Rozière
Falls if CA 63 or AM 601 or block votes
on AM 687/697 is adopted.
759 Kaja Kallas, Dita
Charanzová
Falls if CA1/ CA 63, AM 601 or
AM 757 is adopted.
758 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
Deemed adopted/rejected with AM 601.
760 Birgit Collin-Langen
Falls if CA 63,
AM 757 or block votes on AM 697/698 is
adopted.
Compatible with AM 758/759
761 Constance Le Grip
Falls if CA 63,
AM 757/758 or block votes on AM
697/698 is adopted.
762 Marco Zullo
Falls if CA 63,
AM 757/758, the horizontal amendment or
block votes on AM 697/698 is adopted.
37 LIBE
Falls if CA 63,
AM 757/758 or block votes on AM
697/698 or block vote on AM 697 is
46 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
adopted.
Article 12 –
paragraph 5 a
(new)
763 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
Falls if CA 63, AM 759,
or block vote on AM 697 is adopted.
Article 12 –
paragraph 5 b
(new)
764 Maria Grapini
Falls if CA 63 or block vote on AM 697 is
adopted.
Article 12 –
paragraph 5 c
(new)
765 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
Falls if CA 63 or block vote on AM 697 is
adopted.
Article 12 –
paragraph 5 d
(new)
766 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
Falls if CA 63 is adopted.
Article 12 a
(new)
767 Marco Zullo
Do not put to vote - adopted/rejected with
AM 733 (block vote)
Article 12 c
(new)
769 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Kerstin Westphal,
Biljana Borzan, Josef
Weidenholzer, Lucy
Anderson, Christel
Schaldemose, Anna
Hedh, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Olga
Sehnalová, Marc
Tarabella, Catherine
Stihler, Evelyn Regner
Do not put to vote - adopted/rejected with
AM 697 (block vote)
Article 12 b
(new) 768 Julia Reda
Compatible with CA 63
If adopted, go to CA 69
Article 13 CA
69
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
GUE, Greens, EFDD
+
Block vote with CA 70/ CA 71/ CA 72/
CA 73/ CA 74
/ CA 75
If adopted, go to CA 76
Note: if adopted, this will become Articles
13, 13a, 13b and 13c.
47 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
Article 13 –
title
770 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Nicola Danti, Olga
Sehnalová, Josef
Weidenholzer, Anna
Hedh, Christel
Schaldemose, Lucy
Anderson, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Marc
Tarabella, Evelyn
Regner
Falls if CA 69 is adopted.
771 Marco Zullo
Falls if CA 69 is adopted.
Article 13 –
paragraph 1
772 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Nicola Danti, Biljana
Borzan, Olga
Sehnalová, Lucy
Anderson, Josef
Weidenholzer,
Christel Schaldemose,
Anna Hedh, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Catherine
Stihler, Marc
Tarabella, Evelyn
Regner
Falls if CA 69 is adopted.
773 Daniel Buda Falls if CA 69 or AM 772 is adopted
774 Kaja Kallas, Dita
Charanzová
Falls if CA 69 or if any of the above is
adopted.
775 Daniel Dalton, Vicky
Ford
Falls if CA 69 or if any of the above is
adopted.
776 Angel Dzhambazki
Falls if CA 69 or if any of the above is
adopted.
777 Dita Charanzová
Falls if CA 69 or if any of the above is
adopted.
778 Antanas Guoga
Falls if CA 69 or if any of the above is
adopted.
779 Axel Voss, Eva Falls if CA 69 or if any of the above is
48 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
Maydell adopted.
780 Angelika Niebler
Falls if CA 69 or if any of the above is
adopted.
Article 13 –
paragraph 1 a
(new)
781 Marco Zullo
Falls if CA 69 is adopted.
Article 13 –
paragraph 1 b
(new)
782 Lucy Anderson, Maria
Grapini, Marc
Tarabella, Afzal
Khan, Maria Arena,
Mary Honeyball,
Victor Negrescu
Falls if CA 67 or CA 69 is adopted.
Article 13 –
paragraph 1 c
(new)
783 Daniel Dalton, Vicky
Ford, Anneleen Van
Bossuyt
Falls if CA 69 is adopted.
Article 13 –
paragraph 2
784 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
Falls if CA 69 is adopted.
Deletion - if adopted, go to AM 821
Article 13 –
paragraph 2 –
introductory
part
785 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Nicola Danti, Christel
Schaldemose, Josef
Weidenholzer, Anna
Hedh, Lucy Anderson,
Liisa Jaakonsaari,
Marc Tarabella
Falls if CA 69 or AM 784 is adopted.
Article 13 –
paragraph 2 –
point a
786 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Olga Sehnalová, Lucy
Anderson, Christel
Schaldemose, Anna
Hedh, Josef
Weidenholzer, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Marc
Tarabella, Catherine
Stihler
Falls if CA 69 or AM 784 is adopted.
Deletion - if adopted, go to AM 789
787 Antanas Guoga
Falls if CA 69, AM 784/786 or block vote
on AM 697 is adopted.
788 Angelika Niebler Falls if CA 69 or AM 784/786 is adopted.
49 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
Compatible with AM 787
Article 13 –
paragraph 2 –
point b
789 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Christel Schaldemose,
Lucy Anderson, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Josef
Weidenholzer, Anna
Hedh, Marc Tarabella,
Catherine Stihler
Falls if CA 69 or
AM 784 is adopted
Deletion - if adopted, go to AM 799
791 Daniel Dalton, Vicky
Ford
Falls if CA 1/ CA 69 or AM 784/89 is
adopted.
792 Antanas Guoga
Falls if CA 1/ CA 69 or AM 784/789 is
adopted.
790 Julia Reda
Falls if CA 69 or 784 or any of the above
AMs is adopted.
38 LIBE
Falls if CA 69 or 784 or any of the above
AMs is adopted.
798 Marlene Mizzi
Falls if CA 1/ CA 69 or any of the above
AMs is adopted.
793 Kaja Kallas, Jean-
Marie Cavada, Dita
Charanzová
Falls if CA 69 or if any of the above AMs
is adopted.
794 Birgit Collin-Langen
Falls if CA 69 or if any of the above AMs
is adopted.
796 Marco Zullo
Falls if CA 69 or if any of the above AMs
is adopted.
795 Angel Dzhambazki
Falls if CA 69 or AM 784/789/792 is
adopted.
Compatible with 790/791/793/794/796
797 Virginie Rozière
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
horizontal AMs 1/71/72.
Article 13 –
paragraph 2 –
799 Andreas Schwab Falls if CA 69 or AM 790 is adopted
Deletion - if adopted, go to AM 812
800 Antanas Guoga
50 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
point c
801 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Christel Schaldemose,
Lucy Anderson, Anna
Hedh, Josef
Weidenholzer, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Marc
Tarabella, Catherine
Stihler
Identical - put to vote together
803 Kaja Kallas, Jean-
Marie Cavada, Dita
Charanzová
Falls if CA 69 or AM 799/800/801 is
adopted.
802 Jean-Marie Cavada
Falls if CA 69 or AM 799/800/801 is
adopted.
Compatible with AM 803
807 Daniel Dalton, Vicky
Ford
Falls if CA 1/ CA 69 or AM
799/800/801/803 is adopted.
Except: Compatible with AM 802
805 Virginie Rozière
Falls if CA 69 or if any of the above AMs
is adopted.
Except: AM 802 compatible
806 Angel Dzhambazki
Falls if CA 69 or if any of the above AMs
is adopted.
Except: AM 802 compatible
804 Julia Reda
Falls if CA 69 is adopted.
Compatible with AM 805/806.
Identical - put to vote together
39 LIBE
808 Marco Zullo
Do not put to vote -
Adopted/rejected with AM 796.
809 Dita Charanzová
Falls if CA 69 or any of the above AMs is
adopted.
Except: Compatible with AM
802/804/805/808
810 Constance Le Grip
Falls if CA 69 or if any of the above is
adopted.
51 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
Except: Compatible with
AM802/804/805/808
811 Birgit Collin-Langen
Falls if CA 69 or if any of the above is
adopted.
Except: Compatible with AM
802/804/808/810
Article 13 –
paragraph 2 –
point d
812 Julia Reda Falls if CA 69 is adopted.
Deletion - if adopted, go to AM 815
Identical - put to vote together
813 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Josef Weidenholzer,
Lucy Anderson,
Christel Schaldemose,
Anna Hedh, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Catherine
Stihler, Marc
Tarabella
814 Daniel Dalton, Vicky
Ford
Falls if CA 69 or AM 784/812/813 is
adopted.
Article 13 –
paragraph 2 –
point e
815 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Liisa Jaakonsaari,
Christel Schaldemose,
Lucy Anderson, Anna
Hedh, Josef
Weidenholzer, Marc
Tarabella, Catherine
Stihler
Falls if CA 69 is adopted.
Deletion - if adopted, go to AM 820.
Article 13 –
paragraph 2 –
point e –
introductory
part
816 Daniel Dalton, Vicky
Ford
Falls if CA 69 or AM 784/815 is adopted.
Article 13 –
paragraph 2 –
point e – point
i
818 Dennis de Jong
Falls if CA 69 or AM 784/815 is adopted
If adopted, go to AM 819
Article 13 –
paragraph 2 –
point e – point
817 Daniel Dalton, Vicky
Ford
Falls if CA 69 or AM 784/815 is adopted
Compatible with AM 818.
52 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
i
Article 13 –
paragraph 2 –
point e – point
ii
819 Julia Reda
Falls if CA 69 or AM 784/815 is adopted
Article 13 –
paragraph 2 –
point e a (new)
820 Andreas Schwab
Falls if CA 69 or AM 784/815 is adopted
Article 13 –
paragraph 2 a
(new)
821 Julia Reda
Falls if CA 69 or AM 784/ AM
789/791/792/793/798 are adopted.
Article 13 –
paragraph 2 b
(new)
822 Lara Comi, Elisabetta
Gardini
Falls if CA 69 or AM 758/772 is adopted
Article 13 –
paragraph 2 c
(new)
823 Julia Reda
Falls if CA 69 or AM 799/800/801 is
adopted.
Article 13 –
paragraph 3
824 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Kerstin Westphal,
Biljana Borzan, Josef
Weidenholzer,
Christel Schaldemose,
Lucy Anderson, Anna
Hedh, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Maria
Grapini, Catherine
Stihler, Marc
Tarabella
Falls if CA 69 is adopted.
Deletion
Identical
If adopted, go to AM 830
825 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
826 Kaja Kallas, Dita
Charanzová
Falls if CA 69 or AM 824/825 is adopted
827 Marco Zullo
Falls if CA 69 or AM 824/825 is adopted
If adopted, go to AM 828
829 Julia Reda Falls if CA 69 is adopted
53 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
Falls if any of the above is adopted
828 Antanas Guoga Falls if CA 69 or AM 824/825 is adopted
Article 13 –
paragraph 4
830 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Kerstin Westphal,
Biljana Borzan, Josef
Weidenholzer,
Christel Schaldemose,
Lucy Anderson, Anna
Hedh, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Maria
Grapini, Catherine
Stihler, Marc
Tarabella
Falls if CA 69 is adopted
Deletion
Identical
If adopted, go to AM 836
831 Lara Comi, Elisabetta
Gardini, Stefano
Maullu
832 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
833 Marco Zullo
Falls if CA 69 or AM 830/831/832 is
adopted
Article 13 –
paragraph 5
834 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
Do not vote
Adopted/rejected if AM 765 is
adopted/rejected
Deletion
Identical
835 Julia Reda
836 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Marlene Mizzi, Marc
Tarabella, Catherine
Stihler, Maria Grapini,
Josef Weidenholzer,
Christel Schaldemose,
Lucy Anderson, Anna
Hedh, Liisa
Jaakonsaari
Falls if CA 69 or AM 765 is adopted
If adopted, go to AM 840
837 Lara Comi, Elisabetta Falls if CA 69, AM 765 or AM 836 is
54 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
Gardini, Stefano
Maullu
adopted
If adopted, go to AM 840
838 Marco Zullo
Falls if CA 69, AM 765 or any of the
above AMs is adopted
Article 13 –
paragraph 5 a
(new)
839 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Kerstin Westphal,
Nicola Danti, Marc
Tarabella, Catherine
Stihler, Maria Grapini,
Lucy Anderson, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Christel
Schaldemose, Anna
Hedh
Do not vote
Deemed adopted/rejected if AM 772 is
adopted/rejected
Article 13 –
paragraph 6
840 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
Falls if CA 69 is adopted
Deletion
Identical
If adopted, go to AM 845
841 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Marc Tarabella,
Catherine Stihler,
Josef Weidenholzer,
Lucy Anderson,
Christel Schaldemose,
Anna Hedh, Liisa
Jaakonsaari
842 Antanas Guoga
Falls if CA 69 or AM 840/841 is adopted
If adopted, go to AM 843
844 Othmar Karas
Falls if CA 69 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
If adopted, go to AM 854
843 Marco Zullo
Falls if CA 69, AM 840/841 or AM 844 is
adopted
If adopted, go to AM 854
Article 13 a
(new)
845 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Marlene Mizzi,
Falls if CA 1 or CA 69 is adopted.
Falls if AM 786, AM 789, AMs
55 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
Biljana Borzan, Marc
Tarabella, Catherine
Stihler, Maria Grapini,
Lucy Anderson,
Christel Schaldemose,
Anna Hedh, Josef
Weidenholzer, Liisa
Jaakonsaari
799/800/801, AM 825 and AMs
830/831/832 are not adopted
If adopted, go to AM 854
Article 13 a
(new)
846 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
Falls if CA 1 or CA 69 is adopted.
Falls if AM 784, 824/825 or 840/841 are
not adopted
Article 13 d
(new)
854 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
Falls if CA 55 is adopted
If adopted, go to AM 850
Article 14 a
(new)
871 Marco Zullo
Falls if CA 55 or AM 854 is adopted
If adopted, go to AM 850
Article 13 a
(new)
848 Dietmar Köster
Falls if CA 55 is adopted
Falls if AM 638, AM 854 or 871 is
adopted
If adopted, go to AM 850
Article 13 a
(new)
847 Dennis de Jong
Falls if CA 55 is adopted
Falls if AM 854, AM 871 or 848 is
adopted
If adopted, go to AM 850
Article 13 a
(new)
849 Angelika Niebler
Falls if CA 55 is adopted
Falls if AM 854, AM 871, AM 848 or AM
847 is adopted
Article 13 b
(new)
850 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
Falls if CA 69 is adopted
Falls if AMs 812/813, AM 815 or AMs
830/831/832 are not adopted
Incompatible with AM 817, AM 818 and
AM 819
If adopted, go to AM 852
56 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
Article 13 b
(new)
851 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Marlene Mizzi, Marc
Tarabella, Catherine
Stihler, Lucy
Anderson, Josef
Weidenholzer, Anna
Hedh, Christel
Schaldemose, Liisa
Jaakonsaari
Falls if CA 69 is adopted
Falls if AMs 812/813, AM 815 or AMs
830/831/832 are not adopted
Incompatible with AM 817, AM 818 and
AM 819
Article 13 c
(new)
852 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
Falls if CA 1 or CA 69 is adopted
Falls if AM 846 or AM 850 is not adopted
If adopted, go to AM 855
Article 13 c
(new)
853 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Marc Tarabella,
Catherine Stihler,
Virginie Rozière,
Lucy Anderson,
Christel Schaldemose,
Josef Weidenholzer,
Anna Hedh, Liisa
Jaakonsaari
Falls if CA 1, CA 69 or AM 852 is adopted
Falls if AM 851 is not adopted
Article 14 CA
76
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
GUE, Greens, EFDD
+
Block vote with CA 77
If adopted, go to AM 872
Article 14 855 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
Deletion
Falls if CA 76 or AM 849 is adopted
If adopted, go to AM 872
Article 14 –
paragraph 1
856 Birgit Collin-Langen
Deletion
Falls if CA 76, AM 849 or AM 855 is
adopted
If adopted, go to AM 866
859 Andreas Schwab
Falls if CA 76, AM 855 or AM 856 is
adopted
57 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
861 Antanas Guoga
Falls if CA 76, AM 855 or AM 856 is
adopted
Compatible with AM 859
If adopted, go to AM 860
865 Julia Reda
Falls if CA 76, AM 855 or any of the
above AMs is adopted
Except: compatible with AM 859
If adopted, go to AM 860
40 LIBE
Falls if CA 76, AM 855 or any of the
above AMs is adopted
Except: compatible with AM 859
If adopted, go to AM 860
857 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Nicola Danti, Marc
Tarabella, Lucy
Anderson, Josef
Weidenholzer, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Anna
Hedh
Falls if CA 76, AM 855 or any of the
above AMs is adopted
Except: compatible with AM 859
If adopted, go to AM 866
864 Virginie Rozière
Falls if CA 76, AM 855 or any of the
above AMs is adopted
Except: compatible with AM 859
If adopted, go to AM 860
862 Daniel Dalton, Vicky
Ford
Falls if CA 76, AM 855 or any of the
above AMs is adopted
Except: compatible with AM 859
If adopted, go to AM 860
863 Jean-Marie Cavada
Falls if CA 76, AM 855 or any of the
above AMs is adopted
Except: compatible with AM 859
858 Daniel Buda
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
horizontal AMs 1/71/72.
58 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
860 Marco Zullo
Falls if CA 76, AM 855, AM 856, AM 857
or AM 858 is adopted
Article 14 –
paragraph 2
866 Julia Reda Falls if CA 76 or AM 855 is adopted
Identical
41 LIBE
867 Virginie Rozière
Falls if CA 76 or AM 855 is adopted
Article 14 –
paragraph 2 a
(new)
869 Virginie Rozière
Falls if CA 76, AM 856, AM 861 or AM
855 is adopted
If adopted, go to AM 872
Article 14 –
paragraph 2 a
(new)
868 Constance Le Grip
Falls if AM 856, AM 855 or AM 869 is
adopted
If adopted, go to AM 872
Article 14 –
paragraph 2 a
(new)
870 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Nicola Danti, Marc
Tarabella, Catherine
Stihler, Josef
Weidenholzer,
Christel Schaldemose,
Anna Hedh, Lucy
Anderson, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Maria
Grapini
Falls if AM 856, AM 855, AM 869 or AM
868 is adopted
Article 14 b
(new) 872 Marco Zullo
Falls if AM 634 is adopted
If adopted, go to CA 78
Article 15 CA
78
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
Greens, EFDD
+
Block vote with CA 79
If adopted, go to CA 80
Article 15 –
title
61 Rapporteurs
Falls if CA 78 is adopted
59 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
If adopted, go to AM 875
873 Marco Zullo
Falls if CA 78 or AM 61 is adopted
If adopted, go to AM 875
874 Eva Maydell
Falls if CA 78 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
Article 15 –
paragraph 1 –
introductory
part
875 Eva Maydell
Falls if CA 78 is adopted
If adopted, go to AM 876
878 Kaja Kallas, Dita
Charanzová
Falls if CA 78 or AM 875 is adopted
If adopted, go to AM 877
880 Virginie Rozière
Falls if CA 78, AM 873, AM 875 or AM
878 is adopted
If adopted, go to AM 63
876 Julia Reda
Falls if CA 78, AM 878 or AM 880 is
adopted
If adopted, go to LIBE 42
62 Rapporteurs
Falls if CA 78, AM 875, AM 878, AM 880
or AM 876 is adopted
If adopted, go to AM 63
42 LIBE
Falls if CA 78, AM 875, AM 878, AM 880
or AM 62 is adopted
If adopted, go to AM 879
877 Marco Zullo
Falls if CA 78, AM 875, AM 880, AM 62
or LIBE 42 is adopted
879 Constance Le Grip Falls if CA 78, AM 880 or AM 62 is
60 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
adopted
Article 15 –
paragraph 1 –
point a
63 Rapporteurs
Falls if CA 78 is adopted
If adopted, go to AM 882
881 Eva Maydell
Falls if CA 78, AM 875 or AM 63 is
adopted
882 Virginie Rozière
Falls if CA 78, AM 875, is adopted
Article 15 –
paragraph 1 –
point a a (new)
64 Rapporteurs
Falls if CA 78 or AM 875 is adopted
Article 15 –
paragraph 1 –
point a a (new)
43 LIBE
Falls if CA 78 or AM 876 is adopted
Article 15 –
paragraph 1 –
point b
883 Eva Maydell
Falls if CA 78 is adopted
If adopted, go to AM 887
65 Rapporteurs
Falls if CA 78, AM 875 or AM 883 is
adopted
If adopted, go to AM 885
884 Antanas Guoga
Falls if CA 78, AM 875, AM 883 or AM
65 is adopted
If adopted, go to AM 886
885 Virginie Rozière
Falls if CA 78, AM 875, AM 883 or AM
884 is adopted
886 Daniel Dalton, Vicky
Ford
Falls if CA 78, AM 875, AM 883 or AM
65 is adopted
If adopted, go to AM 887
44 LIBE
Falls if CA 78, AM 875, AM 65 or AM
886 is adopted
61 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
Article 15 –
paragraph 1 –
point c
887 Eva Maydell Falls if CA 78 is adopted
Identical
Deletion
If adopted, go to AM 891
888 Kaja Kallas, Dita
Charanzová
889 Virginie Rozière
66 Rapporteurs
Falls if CA 78, AM 875 or AMs
887/888/889 is adopted
If adopted, go to AM 891
890 Antanas Guoga
Falls if CA 78, AM 875, AMs 887/888/889
or AM 66 is adopted
Article 15 –
paragraph 1 –
point d
891 Eva Maydell Falls if CA 78 is adopted
Identical
Deletion
If adopted, go to AM 896
892 Andreas Schwab
893 Angel Dzhambazki
Falls if CA 78, AM 875 or AM 891/892 is
adopted
45 LIBE
Falls if CA 78, AM 875 or AM 891/892 is
adopted
If adopted, go to AM 896
894 Julia Reda
Falls if CA 78, AM 875, AM 891/892 or
LIBE 45 is adopted
If adopted, go to AM 896
Article 15 –
paragraph 1 a
(new)
895 Virginie Rozière
Falls if CA 78, AM 875, AM 66, AM 890,
AM 891/892, AM 893, LIBE 45 or AM
894 is adopted
Article 15 –
paragraph 2 –
introductory
part
896 Eva Maydell
Falls if CA 78 is adopted
If adopted, go to AM 906
62 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
Article 15 –
paragraph 2 –
point a
897 Eva Maydell
Do not vote
Deletion
Deemed adopted/rejected if AM 896 is
adopted/rejected
67 Rapporteurs
Falls if CA 78 or AM 897 is adopted
If adopted, go to AM 901
898 Marco Zullo
Falls if CA 78, AM 897 or AM 67 is
adopted
Article 15 –
paragraph 2 –
point b
899 Antanas Guoga Do not vote
Identical
Deletion
Deemed adopted/rejected if AM 896 is
adopted/rejected
900 Eva Maydell, Róza
Gräfin von Thun und
Hohenstein
901 Daniel Dalton, Vicky
Ford
Falls if CA 78 or AMs 899/900 is adopted
If adopted, go to AM 903
905 Kaja Kallas, Dita
Charanzová
Falls if CA 78 or any of the above is
adopted
If adopted, go to AM 903
68 Rapporteurs
Falls if CA 78 or any of the above is
adopted
903 Julia Reda Falls if CA 78 or AMs 899/900 is adopted
902 Marco Zullo
Falls if CA 78, AMs 899/900, AM 905 or
AM 901 is adopted
If adopted, go to AM 906
904 Birgit Collin-Langen
Falls if CA 78, AMs 899/900, AM 896
AM 901, AM 905 or 902 is adopted
63 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
Article 15 –
paragraph 2 a
(new)
906 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Marc Tarabella,
Catherine Stihler,
Liisa Jaakonsaari,
Anna Hedh, Christel
Schaldemose, Lucy
Anderson, Josef
Weidenholzer
Falls if CA 78 is adopted
Article 16 CA
80
Supported by
Supported by EPP,
S&D, GUE, ALDE,
Greens, EFDD
+
Vote en block with CA 81
If adopted, go to CA 82
Article 16
907 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
Falls if CA 80 is adopted
Identical
Deletion
If adopted, go to AM 963
908 Andreas Schwab
Article 16 –
paragraph 1
909 Andreas Schwab
Falls if CA 80 or AM 907/908 is adopted
Deletion
If adopted, go to AM 919
910 Jean-Marie Cavada
Falls if CA 80 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
If adopted, go to AM 919
911 Angel Dzhambazki
Falls if CA 80 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
If adopted, go to AM 919
918 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Nicola Danti, Marc
Tarabella, Catherine
Stihler, Josef
Weidenholzer, Anna
Hedh, Lucy Anderson,
Christel Schaldemose,
Falls if CA 80 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
If adopted, go to AM 914
64 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
Maria Grapini
917 Julia Reda
Falls if CA 80 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
If adopted, go to AM 913
912 Liisa Jaakonsaari
Falls if CA 80 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
If adopted, go to AM 914
913 Philippe Juvin
Falls if CA 80 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
Except: compatible with AM 917
914 Daniel Dalton, Vicky
Ford
Falls if CA 80, AM 907/908, AM 909, AM
910 or AM 911 is adopted
916 Virginie Rozière
Falls if CA 80, AM 907/908, AM 909, AM
910 or AM 911 is adopted
915 Marco Zullo
Falls if CA 80, AM 907/908, AM 909, AM
910, AM 911, AM 912, AM 913 or AM
918 is adopted
Article 16 –
paragraph 2
919 Andreas Schwab
Deletion
Falls if CA 80 or AMs 907/908 is adopted
If adopted, go to AM 926
920 Kaja Kallas, Dita
Charanzová
Falls if CA 80, AMs 907/908 or AM 919 is
adopted
If adopted, go to AM 923
921 Dita Charanzová
Falls if CA 80, AMs 907/908, AM 919 or
AM 920 is adopted
If adopted, go to AM 923
922 Angel Dzhambazki
Falls if CA 80, AMs 907/908, AM 919,
AM 920 or AM 921 is adopted
65 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
If adopted, go to AM 923
924 Angelika Niebler
Falls if CA 80, AMs 907/908, AM 919,
AM 920, AM 921 or AM 922 is adopted
If adopted, go to AM 923
925 Antanas Guoga
Falls if CA 80, AMs 907/908, AM 919,
AM 920, AM 921, AM 922 or AM 924 is
adopted
923 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Nicola Danti, Marc
Tarabella
Falls if CA 80, AMs 907/908 or AM 919 is
adopted
Article 16 –
paragraph 3
926 Andreas Schwab
Deletion
Falls if CA 80 or AMs 907/908 is adopted
If adopted, go to AM 931
927 Constance Le Grip
Falls if CA 80, AMs 907/908 or AM 926 is
adopted
928 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Nicola Danti, Marc
Tarabella, Maria
Grapini, Christel
Schaldemose, Lucy
Anderson, Anna
Hedh, Josef
Weidenholzer, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Evelyn
Regner
Falls if CA 80, AMs 907/908 or AM 926 is
adopted
If adopted, go to AM 931
929 Marco Zullo
Falls if CA 80, AMs 907/908, AM 926 or
AM 928 is adopted
930 Virginie Rozière
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
horizontal AMs 1/71/72.
Article 16 – 931 Antanas Guoga Identical
66 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
paragraph 4
932 Andreas Schwab
Deletion
Falls if CA 80 or AMs 907/908 is adopted
If adopted, go to AM 956
Article 16 –
paragraph 4 –
introductory
part
933 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Nicola Danti, Marc
Tarabella, Josef
Weidenholzer,
Christel Schaldemose,
Anna Hedh, Lucy
Anderson, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Evelyn
Regner
Falls if CA 80, AMs 907/908 or AMs
931/932 is adopted
Article 16 –
paragraph 4 –
point a
934 Antanas Guoga
Deletion
Falls if CA 80, AMs 907/908 or AMs
931/932 is adopted
If adopted, go to AM 942
46 LIBE
Falls if CA 80, AMs 907/908, AMs
931/932 or AM 934 is adopted
If adopted, go to AM 942
935 Julia Reda
Falls if CA 80, AMs 907/908, AMs
931/932 or any of the above is adopted
If adopted, go to AM 942
941 Kaja Kallas, Dita
Charanzová
Falls if CA 80, AMs 907/908, AMs
931/932 or any of the above is adopted
If adopted, go to AM 942
936 Daniel Dalton, Vicky
Ford
Falls if CA 80, AMs 907/908 or AMs
931/932 or any of the above is adopted
If adopted, go to AM 942
937 Angel Dzhambazki Falls if CA 80, AMs 907/908 or AMs
67 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
931/932 or any of the above is adopted
940 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Nicola Danti, Marc
Tarabella, Josef
Weidenholzer, Lucy
Anderson, Christel
Schaldemose, Anna
Hedh, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Evelyn
Regner
Falls if CA 80, AMs 907/908 or AMs
931/932 or any of the above is adopted
Except: compatible with AM 937
938 Marco Zullo
Falls if CA 80, AMs 907/908 or AMs
931/932 or any of the above is adopted
Except: compatible with AM 937 and AM
940
939 Birgit Collin-Langen
Falls if CA 80, AMs 907/908 or AMs
931/932 or any of the above is adopted
Except: compatible with AM 937, AM
940 and AM 938
Article 16 –
paragraph 4 –
point b
942 Antanas Guoga
Deletion
Falls if CA 80 or AMs 907/908 or AMs
931/932 is adopted
If adopted, go to AM 952
945 Kaja Kallas, Dita
Charanzová
Falls if CA 80, AMs 907/908, AMs
931/932 or AM 942 is adopted
If adopted, go to AM 952
943 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Nicola Danti, Marc
Tarabella, Josef
Weidenholzer, Anna
Hedh, Christel
Schaldemose, Lucy
Anderson, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Evelyn
Regner
Falls if CA 80, AMs 907/908, AMs
931/932 or any of the above is adopted
If adopted, go to AM 952
47 LIBE Falls if CA 80, AMs 907/908, AMs
68 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
931/932 or any of the above is adopted
If adopted, go to AM 952
944 Julia Reda
Falls if CA 80, AMs 907/908, AMs
931/932 or any of the above is adopted
If adopted, go to AM 952
947 Daniel Dalton, Vicky
Ford
Falls if CA 80, AMs 907/908, AMs
931/932 or any of the above is adopted
If adopted, go to AM 952
946 Angel Dzhambazki Identical
Falls if CA 80, AMs 907/908, AMs
931/932 or any of the above is adopted
If adopted, go to AM 950
948 Dita Charanzová
949 Marco Zullo
Falls if CA 80, AMs 907/908, AMs
931/932 or any of the above is adopted
950 Virginie Rozière
Falls if CA 80, AMs 907/908, AMs
931/932 or any of the above is adopted
Except: compatible with AM 948 and AM
949
If adopted, go to AM 952
951 Birgit Collin-Langen
Falls if CA 80, AMs 907/908, AMs
931/932 or any of the above is adopted
Article 16 –
paragraph 4 –
point c
952 Antanas Guoga
Deletion
Falls if CA 80, AMs 907/908 or AMs
931/932 is adopted
If adopted, go to AM 955
953 Julia Reda
Falls if CA 80, AMs 907/908, AMs
931/932 or AM 952 is adopted
954 Marco Zullo
Falls if CA 80, AMs 907/908, AMs
931/932 or AM 952 is adopted
69 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
Article 16 –
paragraph 4 a
(new)
955 Julia Reda
Falls if CA 80, AMs 907/908, AM
931/932, AM 934 is adopted
Article 16 –
paragraph 4 a
(new)
956 Antanas Guoga
Falls if CA 80 or AMs 907/908 is adopted
Article 16 –
paragraph 4 b
(new)
957 Julia Reda
Falls if CA 80, AMs 907/908, AM
931/932, AM 942 is adopted
Article 16 –
paragraph 5
958 Andreas Schwab
Deletion
Falls if CA 80 or AMs 907/908 is adopted
If adopted, go to CA 82
959 Kaja Kallas, Dita
Charanzová
Falls if CA 80, AMs 907/908, AM
931/932, AM 942 or AM 958 is adopted
960 Marco Zullo
Falls if CA 80, AMs 907/908, AM
931/932, AM 942 or AM 958 is adopted
961 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Marc Tarabella, Josef
Weidenholzer, Anna
Hedh, Lucy Anderson,
Christel Schaldemose,
Liisa Jaakonsaari,
Evelyn Regner
Falls if CA 80, AMs 907/908, AM
931/932, AM 942 or AM 958 is adopted
962 Antanas Guoga
Falls if CA 80, AMs 907/908, AM 958 or
AM 959 is adopted
Article 17 CA
82
Supported by
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
GUE, Greens, EFDD
+
Vote en block with CA 83
If adopted, go to CA 83bis
Article 17 –
paragraph 1
963 Dennis de Jong
Falls if CA 82 is adopted
964 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Marlene Mizzi, Nicola
Falls if CA 82 is adopted
70 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
Danti, Catherine
Stihler, Josef
Weidenholzer, Anna
Hedh, Christel
Schaldemose, Lucy
Anderson, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Evelyn
Regner
965 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
Falls if CA 82 is adopted
If adopted, go to AM 967
966 Marco Zullo
Falls if CA 82, AM 964 or AM 965 is
adopted
967 Julia Reda
Falls if CA 82 is adopted
If adopted, go to CA 83bis
Article 17 –
paragraph 1 a
(new)
968 Lucy Anderson, Maria
Grapini, Marc
Tarabella, Evelyne
Gebhardt, Marju
Lauristin, Afzal Khan,
Maria Arena, Mary
Honeyball, Victor
Negrescu
Falls if CA 82 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
Note: if adopted, this amendment would
amend Article 17 - paragraph 1
Article 18 CA
83bi
s
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
GUE, Greens, EFDD
+
Block vote with CA 83ter
If adopted, go to AM 975/LIBE 50
Article 18 –
paragraph 1
969 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Marlene Mizzi, Marc
Tarabella, Catherine
Stihler, Virginie
Rozière, Lucy
Anderson, Christel
Schaldemose, Anna
Hedh, Josef
Weidenholzer, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Olga
Sehnalová, Evelyn
Falls if CA 83bis is adopted
71 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
Regner
970 Julia Reda Falls if CA 83bis is adopted Identical
48 LIBE
Article 18 –
paragraph 2 –
introductory
part
971 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Nicola Danti, Marc
Tarabella, Josef
Weidenholzer,
Virginie Rozière,
Christel Schaldemose,
Lucy Anderson, Anna
Hedh, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Evelyn
Regner
Falls if CA 83bis is adopted
Article 18 –
paragraph 2 –
point a
972 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Nicola Danti, Marc
Tarabella, Josef
Weidenholzer,
Christel Schaldemose,
Lucy Anderson, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Anna
Hedh, Evelyn Regner
Falls if CA 83bis is adopted
Article 18 –
paragraph 2 –
point b
973 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Nicola Danti, Marc
Tarabella, Catherine
Stihler, Josef
Weidenholzer, Anna
Hedh, Christel
Schaldemose, Lucy
Anderson, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Evelyn
Regner
Falls if CA 83bis is adopted
Article 18 –
paragraph 2 –
point c a (new)
974 Julia Reda
Falls if CA 83bis is adopted
If adopted, go to AM 975
Article 18 –
paragraph 2 –
point c a (new)
49 LIBE
Falls if CA 83bis or AM 974 is adopted
72 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
Article 18 a
(new) 975 Julia Reda
Falls if CA 1 is adopted
Identical
If adopted, go to CA 84
Article 19 a
(new)
50 LIBE
Article 20 CA
84
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
GUE, Greens, EFDD
+
Block vote with CA 85
If adopted, go to AM 979 pc2
Article 20 –
title
976 Inese Vaidere
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
AM 981
Article 20 –
paragraph 1
Article 1 –
paragraph 2 –
point b –
indent 4
977 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Axel Voss, Marc
Tarabella, Catherine
Stihler, Anna Hedh,
Josef Weidenholzer,
Lucy Anderson,
Christel Schaldemose,
Liisa Jaakonsaari,
Evelyn Regner
Falls if CA 84, CA 14, AM 441, AM 463
or AM 470 is adopted
Article 20 –
paragraph 1 –
indent 1 (new)
Article 1 –
paragraph 2 –
point b –
indent 4 a
(new)
978 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Josef Weidenholzer,
Christel Schaldemose,
Lucy Anderson, Anna
Hedh, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Catherine
Stihler, Marc
Tarabella, Axel Voss,
Evelyn Regner
Falls if CA 84, CA 14, AM 463, AM 469
or AM 470 is adopted
Article 20 –
paragraph 3 a
(new)
981 Inese Vaidere
Falls if CA 84, CA 12, AM 21, AM 22,
AM 372, AM 373, AM 374, AM 375, AM
376, AM 377, AM 378, AM 379, AM 380,
AM 381, AM 382, AM 383, AM 384, AM
385, AM 386 or AM 387 is adopted
Article 20 –
paragraph 1 a
(new)
Annex -
paragraph 1 a
979
pc1
Julia Reda
AM 979 excluding points a, d and e
73 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
(new)
Article 20 –
paragraph 1 a
(new)
Annex –
paragraph 1 a
(new)
980
pc1
Evelyne Gebhardt,
Marc Tarabella,
Catherine Stihler,
Evelyn Regner, Lucy
Anderson, Christel
Schaldemose, Josef
Weidenholzer, Anna
Hedh, Liisa
Jaakonsaari
AM 980 excluding point c
Article 20 –
paragraph 1 a
(new)
Annex -
paragraph 1 a
(new)
979
pc2
Julia Reda
Put to vote as an addition to CA 84
If adopted, go to 980 pc2
Article 20 –
paragraph 1 a
(new)
Annex –
paragraph 1 a
(new)
980
pc2
Evelyne Gebhardt,
Marc Tarabella,
Catherine Stihler,
Evelyn Regner, Lucy
Anderson, Christel
Schaldemose, Josef
Weidenholzer, Anna
Hedh, Liisa
Jaakonsaari
Put to vote as an addition to CA84
If adopted, go to CA 86
Article 22 CA
86
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
GUE, Greens, EFDD
+
If adopted, go to AM 69
Article 22 –
paragraph 1
985 Vicky Ford, Daniel
Dalton
Falls if CA 86 is adopted
If adopted, go to AM 69
51 LIBE
Falls if AM 985 or CA 86 is adopted
982 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Nicola Danti, Marc
Tarabella, Anna Hedh,
Josef Weidenholzer,
Falls if CA 86 or any of the above is
adopted
74 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
Lucy Anderson,
Christel Schaldemose,
Liisa Jaakonsaari,
Evelyn Regner,
Virginie Rozière, Olga
Sehnalová
983 Virginie Rozière
Falls if CA 86 or any of the above is
adopted
984 Kaja Kallas, Dita
Charanzová, Jean-
Marie Cavada
Falls if CA 86 or any of the above is
adopted
986 Antanas Guoga
Falls if CA 86 or any of the above is
adopted
987 Julia Reda
Falls if CA 86 or any of the above is
adopted
Citations
Citation 6 a
(new) 69 Notis Marias
If adopted, go to AM 70
Citation 6 b
(new) 70 Notis Marias
If adopted, go to AM 79
Recitals
Recital 1
CA
5
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
GUE, Greens, EFDD
+
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
CA 4 (Article 1)
73 Mylène Troszczynski
Falls if CA 5 is adopted
Falls if AM 365, 366, 367, 368, 369 or 370
is adopted
75 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
74 Marlene Mizzi Falls if CA 5 or AM 73 is adopted
2 Rapporteurs
Identical. Put to vote together
Fall if CA 5 or AM 73 is adopted
Compatible with 74: put to vote as an
addition
78 Marco Zullo
75 Maria Grapini
Falls if CA 5 or AM 73 is adopted
Compatible with AMs 74 and 2: put to
vote as an addition
76 Daniel Dalton, Vicky
Ford
Falls if CA 5 or AM 73, 74 or 2 is adopted
Compatible with AMs 75: put to vote as an
addition
77 Daniel Buda
Falls if CA 5 or AM 73, 74 or 2 is adopted
Compatible with AMs 75 and 76: put to
vote as an addition
Recital 1 a
(new) 79 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Christel Schaldemose,
Lucy Anderson, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Virginie
Rozière, Olga
Sehnalová, Maria
Grapini, Nicola Danti,
Josef Weidenholzer,
Anna Hedh, Marlene
Mizzi, Marc
Tarabella, Catherine
Stihler, Evelyn Regner
If adopted, go to 80
Recital 1 b
(new) 80 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Lucy Anderson, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Christel
Schaldemose, Maria
Grapini, Virginie
Rozière, Josef
Weidenholzer, Nicola
Danti, Anna Hedh,
Marlene Mizzi, Marc
Tarabella, Catherine
Stihler, Evelyn Regner
If adopted, go to CA 19
76 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
Recital 2
CA
6
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
GUE, Greens, EFDD
+
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
CA 4 (Article 1)
81 Mylène Troszczynski
Deletion
Falls if CA 6 is adopted
Falls if AM 365, 366, 367, 368, 369 or 370
is adopted
82 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Lucy Anderson,
Christel Schaldemose,
Liisa Jaakonsaari,
Marlene Mizzi, Maria
Grapini, Nicola Danti,
Josef Weidenholzer,
Anna Hedh, Marc
Tarabella, Catherine
Stihler, Evelyn Regner
Falls if CA 6 or AM 81 is adopted
83 Daniel Buda Falls if CA 6 or AM 81 or 82 is adopted
84 Daniel Dalton, Vicky
Ford, Anneleen Van
Bossuyt
Falls if CA 6 or AM 81 or 82 is adopted
Compatible with AM 83: put to vote as an
addition
86 Jean-Marie Cavada
Falls if CA 6 or AM 81, 82 or 83 is
adopted
Compatible with AM 84: put to vote as an
addition
85 Notis Marias
Identical. Put to vote together
Fall if CA 6 or AM 81, 82, 83 or 86 is
adopted
Compatible with AM 84: put to vote as an
addition
87 Antanas Guoga
88 Maria Grapini
Falls if CA 6 AM 81 or 82 is adopted
77 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
Compatible with all other AMs: put to vote
as an addition
1 LIBE
Falls if CA 6 or AM 81 or 82 is adopted
Compatible with all other AMs: put to vote
as an addition
3 Rapporteurs
Identical
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
horizontal AMs 1/71/72
89 Marco Zullo
90 Jirí Pospíšil
Falls if CA 6 or AM 81 or 82 is adopted
Compatible with all other AMs: put to vote
as an addition
Recital 2 a
(new)
91 Eva Maydell, Andreas
Schwab
Falls if CA 6 is adopted
Recital 2 a
(new)
92 Victor Negrescu
Falls if CA 6 is adopted
(Note: if adopted, will be moved after recital
53)
Recital 3 CA
7
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
GUE, Greens, EFDD +
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
CA 4 (Article 1)
If adopted, recital 3 will become recital 4
93 Mylène Troszczynski
Falls if CA 7 is adopted
Falls if AM 365, 366, 367, 368, 369 or 370
is adopted
94 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Lucy Anderson,
Christel Schaldemose,
Liisa Jaakonsaari,
Kerstin Westphal,
Josef Weidenholzer,
Anna Hedh, Marc
Tarabella, Catherine
Stihler, Evelyn Regner
Falls if CA 7 or AM 93 is adopted
78 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
96 Daniel Buda Falls if CA 7 or AM 93 or 94 is adopted
4 Rapporteurs
Identical. Put to vote together
Fall if CA 7 or AM 93, 94 or 96 is adopted
95 Eva Maydell
97 Marco Zullo
Falls if CA 7 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
98 Daniel Dalton, Vicky
Ford
Falls if CA 7 or AM 93 or 94 is adopted
Compatible with the other AMs: put to
vote as an addition
99 Notis Marias
Falls if CA 7 or AM 93 or 94 is adopted
Compatible with the other AMs: put to
vote as an addition
100 Maria Grapini
Falls if CA 7 or AM 93 or 94 is adopted
Compatible with the other AMs: put to
vote as an addition
101 Jirí Pospíšil
Falls if CA 7 or AM 93 or 94 is adopted
Compatible with the other AMs: put to
vote as an addition
Recital 4
CA
8
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
GUE, Greens, EFDD +
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
CA 4 (Article 1)
If adopted, recital 4 will become recital 3
102 Eva Maydell
Deletion
Identical. Put to vote together
Falls if CA 8 is adopted
103 Mylène Troszczynski
104 Daniel Buda Falls if CA 8 or AMs 102/103 are adopted
105 Jirí Pospíšil
Falls if CA 8 or AMs 102/103 are adopted
Compatible with 104: put to vote as an
79 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
addition
107 Virginie Rozière
Falls if CA 8 or AMs 102/103 are adopted
Compatible with the other AMs: put to
vote as an addition
5 Rapporteurs
Falls if CA 8 or any of the above AMs is
adopted,
except AM 105: put to vote as an addition
108 Daniel Dalton, Vicky
Ford, Anneleen Van
Bossuyt
Falls if CA 8 or AMs 102/103 or 105 are
adopted
Compatible with the other AMs: put to
vote as an addition
106 Marco Zullo
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
horizontal AMs 1/71/72
Recital 5 CA
36
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
Greens, EFDD
+
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
CA 35 (Article 4)
109 Mylène Troszczynski
Deletion
Falls if CA 36 is adopted
110 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Lucy Anderson, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Christel
Schaldemose, Olga
Sehnalová, Maria
Grapini, Josef
Weidenholzer, Anna
Hedh, Marc Tarabella,
Catherine Stihler,
Evelyn Regner
Falls if CA 36 or AM 109 is adopted
111 Julia Reda
Falls if CA 36, AM 109 or AM 110 is
adopted
112 Marlene Mizzi
Falls if CA 36 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
80 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
113 Daniel Dalton, Vicky
Ford, Anneleen Van
Bossuyt
Falls if CA 36 or AM 109 is adopted
Compatible with the other AMs above: put
to vote as an addition
114 Daniel Buda
Falls if CA 36 or AM 109 is adopted
Compatible with the other AMs above: put
to vote as an addition
115 Victor Negrescu
Falls if CA 36 or AM 109 is adopted
Compatible with the other AMs above: put
to vote as an addition
118 Eva Maydell
Falls if CA 36 or AM 109 is adopted
Compatible with the other AMs above: put
to vote as an addition
6 Rapporteurs
Identical
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
horizontal AMs 1/71/72
116 Virginie Rozière
117 Marco Zullo
Recital 6 +
recital 7
CA
37
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
GUE, Greens, EFDD
+
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
CA 35 (Article 4)
Recital 6 119 Mylène Troszczynski
Deletion
Falls if CA 37 is adopted
120 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Lucy Anderson,
Christel Schaldemose,
Liisa Jaakonsaari,
Kerstin Westphal,
Olga Sehnalová,
Maria Grapini, Josef
Weidenholzer, Anna
Hedh, Marc Tarabella,
Catherine Stihler,
Evelyn Regner
Falls if CA 37 or AM 119 is adopted
81 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
121 Julia Reda
Falls if CA 37 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
122 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
Falls if CA 37 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
If adopted, recitals 6 and 7 change place
125 Virginie Rozière
Falls if CA 37 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
123 Notis Marias
Falls if CA 37 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
124 Daniel Buda
Falls if CA 37 or any of the above AMs is
adopted,
except AM 123: compatible, put to vote as
addition
126 Marco Zullo
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
horizontal AMs 1/71/72
Recital 7
127 Mylène Troszczynski
Deletion
Falls if CA 37 is adopted
128 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Lucy Anderson,
Christel Schaldemose,
Liisa Jaakonsaari,
Marlene Mizzi, Josef
Weidenholzer, Anna
Hedh, Marc Tarabella,
Catherine Stihler,
Evelyn Regner
Falls if CA 37 or AM 127 is adopted
129 Julia Reda
Falls if CA 37 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
130 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
Falls if CA 37 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
Note: changes recitals 6 and 7 from place
82 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
132 Virginie Rozière
Falls if CA 37 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
131 Daniel Buda
Falls if CA 37 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
133 Marco Zullo
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
horizontal AMs 1/71/72
134 Notis Marias
Falls if CA 37 or any of the above AMs is
adopted,
except AM 131 and 133: compatible, put
to vote as addition
2 LIBE
Falls if CA 37 or any of the above AMs is
adopted,
except AM 131, 133 and 134: compatible,
put to vote as addition
Recital 7a
(new)
CA
19
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
GUE, Greens, EFDD
+ If adopted, go to CA 11
7 Rapporteurs
Falls if CA 19 is adopted
Recital 8
CA
9
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, GUE,
Greens, EFDD
+
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
CA 35 (Article 4)
135 Julia Reda Falls if CA 9 is adopted
136 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Lucy Anderson,
Christel Schaldemose,
Liisa Jaakonsaari,
Maria Grapini, Josef
Weidenholzer, Anna
Hedh, Marc Tarabella,
Catherine Stihler,
Evelyn Regner
Falls if CA 9 or AM 135 is adopted
137 Jean-Marie Cavada Falls if CA 9 or AM 135 or 136 is adopted
83 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
138 Constance Le Grip
Falls if CA 9 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
139 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
Falls if CA 9 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
140 Antanas Guoga
Falls if CA 9 is adopted
Compatible with any of the above AMs.
Put to vote as addition
141 Notis Marias
Falls if CA 9 is adopted
Compatible with any of the above AMs.
Put to vote as addition
142 Virginie Rozière
Identical
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
horizontal AMs 1/71/72
143 Marco Zullo
Recital 9
CA
10
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
GUE, Greens, EFDD
+
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
CA 35 (Article 4)
144 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Lucy Anderson,
Christel Schaldemose,
Liisa Jaakonsaari,
Josef Weidenholzer,
Anna Hedh, Marc
Tarabella, Catherine
Stihler, Evelyn Regner
Deletion
Identical. Put to vote together
Falls if CA 10 is adopted
145 Mylène Troszczynski
146 Julia Reda
Falls if CA 10 or AMs 144/145 are
adopted
148 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
Falls if CA 10 or AMs 144/145 or AM 146
is adopted
147 Daniel Buda
Falls if CA 10 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
149 Virginie Rozière Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
84 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
horizontal AMs 1/71/72
Recital 10 CA
68
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, GUE,
Greens, EFDD
+
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
CA 67 (Article 3(9))
Recital 9 a
(new)
150 Lucy Anderson, Maria
Grapini, Marc
Tarabella, Afzal
Khan, Maria Arena,
Mary Honeyball,
Victor Negrescu
Falls if CA 68 or CA 68 is adopted
Recital 10 151 Notis Marias Falls if CA 68 or CA 68 is adopted
152 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
Falls if CA 68 or CA 68 or AM 151 is
adopted
Recital 10 a
(new)
CA
11
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
EFDD
+
If adopted, go to 173
8 Rapporteurs Falls if CA 11 or AM 152 is adopted.
153 Julia Reda
Falls if CA 11 or AM 152 or AM 8 is
adopted
Recital 11
CA
15
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
GUE, Greens, EFDD
+
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
CA 14 (Article 3(3))
9 Rapporteurs
Identical. Put to vote together
Falls if CA is adopted
154 Virginie Rozière
157 Eva Maydell, Axel
Voss, Pascal Arimont
Falls if CA or AMs 9/154 adopted
155 Julia Reda
Falls if CA or any of the above AMs is
adopted
156 Daniel Buda
Falls if CA or any of the above AMs is
adopted
158 Marco Zullo
Falls if CA or any of the above AMs is
adopted
85 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
159 Daniel Dalton, Vicky
Ford
Falls if CA or any of the above AMs is
adopted
160 Kaja Kallas, Dita
Charanzová
Falls if CA or any of the above AMs is
adopted
161 Antanas Guoga
Identical. Put to vote together
Falls if CA or any of the above AMs is
adopted
162 Marietje Schaake
3 LIBE
163 Notis Marias
Falls if CA or any of the above AMs is
adopted
Recital 12
CA
16
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
GUE, Greens, EFDD
+
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
CA 14 (Article 3(3))
10 Rapporteurs Falls if CA is adopted
164 Antanas Guoga Falls if CA or AM 10 is adopted
165 Eva Maydell, Pascal
Arimont
Falls if CA or any of the above AMs is
adopted
166 Virginie Rozière
Falls if CA or any of the above AMs is
adopted
167 Marco Zullo
Falls if CA or any of the above AMs is
adopted
168 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Lucy Anderson,
Christel Schaldemose,
Liisa Jaakonsaari,
Marlene Mizzi, Olga
Sehnalová, Josef
Weidenholzer, Anna
Hedh, Marc Tarabella,
Catherine Stihler,
Evelyn Regner
Falls if CA or any of the above AMs is
adopted
169 Róza Gräfin von Thun
und Hohenstein,
Tadeusz Zwiefka
Falls if CA or any of the above AMs is
adopted
86 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
170 Julia Reda
Falls if CA or any of the above AMs is
adopted
171 Daniel Dalton, Vicky
Ford
Falls if CA or any of the above AMs is
adopted
Recital 47 CA
83
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
GUE, Greens, EFDD
+
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
CA 82 (Article 17)
Recital 12 a
(new)
172 Lucy Anderson, Maria
Grapini, Marc
Tarabella, Evelyne
Gebhardt, Marlene
Mizzi, Marju
Lauristin, Afzal Khan,
Maria Arena, Mary
Honeyball, Victor
Negrescu
Falls if CA 83 is adopted
Recital 12 b
(new) 173 Lucy Anderson, Maria
Grapini, Marc
Tarabella, Afzal
Khan, Maria Arena,
Mary Honeyball,
Victor Negrescu
If adopted, go to 202
Recital 13
CA
25
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
GUE, Greens
+
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
CA 24 (Article 3, paras 1 and 4)
174 Daniel Dalton, Vicky
Ford
Falls if CA 25 is adopted
175 Kaja Kallas, Jean-
Marie Cavada, Dita
Charanzová
Falls if CA 25 or AM 174 is adopted
11 Rapporteurs
Falls if CA 25 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
176 Eva Maydell, Róza
Gräfin von Thun und
Hohenstein
Falls if CA 25 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
87 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
177 Antanas Guoga
Falls if CA 25 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
178 Marco Zullo
Falls if CA 25 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
179 Daniel Buda
Falls if CA 25 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
Recital 13 a
(new)
180 Jean-Marie Cavada
Falls if CA 25, AM 174 or AM 175 is
adopted
Recital 13 a
(new)
181 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Virginie Rozière,
Lucy Anderson,
Christel Schaldemose,
Liisa Jaakonsaari,
Marlene Mizzi, Maria
Grapini, Kerstin
Westphal, Josef
Weidenholzer, Anna
Hedh, Marc Tarabella,
Catherine Stihler,
Evelyn Regner
Falls if CA 3 is adopted
Recital 13 a
(new)
182 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
Falls if CA 3 or AM 181 is adopted
Recital 13 b
(new)
183 Jean-Marie Cavada
Falls if CA 3 or AM 181 or AM 182 is
adopted
Recital 13 b
(new)
184
cp 1
Evelyne Gebhardt,
Lucy Anderson, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Christel
Schaldemose, Virginie
Rozière, Kerstin
Westphal, Maria
Grapini, Josef
Weidenholzer, Anna
Hedh, Marc Tarabella,
Evelyn Regner
Falls if CA 3 is adopted
184
cp 2
Evelyne Gebhardt,
Lucy Anderson, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Christel
Do not put to vote. Adopted/rejected with
AM 980 pc 2
88 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
Schaldemose, Virginie
Rozière, Kerstin
Westphal, Maria
Grapini, Josef
Weidenholzer, Anna
Hedh, Marc Tarabella,
Evelyn Regner
Recital 14
CA
26
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
GUE, Greens
+
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
CA 24 (Article 3(1) and (4))
185 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Christel Schaldemose,
Lucy Anderson, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Maria
Grapini, Anna Hedh,
Josef Weidenholzer,
Marc Tarabella,
Evelyn Regner
Deletion.
Falls if CA 26 is adopted
186 Vicky Ford WD WITHDRAWN WD
4 LIBE Falls if CA 26 or AM 185 is adopted
187 Daniel Dalton, Vicky
Ford, Anneleen Van
Bossuyt
Falls if CA 26 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
188 Julia Reda
Falls if CA 26 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
189 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
Falls if CA 26 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
190 Kaja Kallas, Dita
Charanzová
Falls if CA 26 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
192 Virginie Rozière
Falls if CA 26 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
193 Marco Zullo
Falls if CA 26 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
194 Birgit Collin-Langen Falls if CA 26 or any of the above AMs is
89 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
adopted
191 Antanas Guoga
Falls if CA 26 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
195 Notis Marias
Falls if CA 26 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
196 Jean-Marie Cavada
Falls if CA 26 or AM 185 is adopted
Compatible with the other AMs. Put to
vote as an addition
Recital 14 a
(new)
197 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
Falls if CA 3 or AM 184 is adopted
Recital 15
CA
70
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
GUE, Greens, EFDD
+
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
CA 69 (Article 13, 13a, 13b, 13c)
198 Kaja Kallas, Dita
Charanzová
Falls if CA 70 is adopted
199 Julia Reda Falls if CA 70 or AM 198 is adopted
200 Notis Marias
Falls if CA70 or CA 3 or AM 198 or AM
199 is adopted
201 Antanas Guoga
Falls if CA 70 is adopted
Compatible with any of the above AMs:
put to vote as addition
Recital 15 a
(new) 202 Victor Negrescu
If adopted, go to 203
Recital 15 b
(new) 203 Victor Negrescu
If adopted, go to 204
Recital 15 c
(new) 204 Victor Negrescu
If adopted, go to CA 23
Recital 16
CA
29
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
GUE, Greens, EFDD
+
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
CA 28
90 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
205 Marco Zullo Falls if CA 29 is adopted
206 Julia Reda Falls if CA 29 or AM 205 is adopted
207 Daniel Buda
Falls if CA 29 or AM 205 or AM 206 is
adopted
12 Rapporteurs
Falls if CA 29 or AM 207 is adopted
Compatible with AMs 205 and 206: put to
vote as addition
Recital 17
CA
2
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
GUE, Greens, EFDD
+
Do not put to vote: CA adopted/rejected
with CA 1
5 LIBE
Deletion
Falls if CA 2 is adopted
208 Jean-Marie Cavada Falls if CA 2 or AM LIBE 5 is adopted
209 Notis Marias
Falls if CA 2 or AM LIBE 5 is adopted
Compatible with AM 208: put to vote as
addition
13 Rapporteurs
Identical.
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
horizontal AMs 1/71/72
210 Marco Zullo
Recital 18
CA
23
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
GUE, Greens, EFDD +
If adopted, go to CA 34
Note: the words “the definition of a
contract under” will be deleted if AM 420
is adopted
211 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
Falls if CA 23 is adopted
212 Julia Reda
Identical. Put to vote together
Fall if CA 23 or CA 3 is adopted
6 LIBE
91 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
Compatible with AM 211: put to vote as
addition
Recital 18 a
(new)
213 Eva Maydell
Falls if CA 3 is adopted
Recital 19 CA
27
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
GUE, Greens, EFDD
+
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
CA 24 (Article 3(1) and (4))
214 Antanas Guoga Falls if CA 27 is adopted
215 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
horizontal AMs 1/71/72
Recital 20 CA
32
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE, +
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
CA 24 (Article 3(6))
216 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
horizontal AMs 1/71/72
Recital 21
CA
34
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
GUE, Greens, EFDD
+
If adopted, go to 256
217 Notis Marias Falls if CA 34 is adopted
218 Julia Reda, Kaja
Kallas
Falls if CA 34 or AM 217 is adopted
219 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
horizontal AMs 1/71/72
220 Jean-Marie Cavada
Falls if CA 34 or AM 217 is adopted
Compatible with AMs 218 and 219
Recital 22 +
recital 22a
(new)
CA
3
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
GUE, Greens, EFDD
+
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
CA 1
Recital 22 221 Eva Maydell
Deletion
Falls if CA 3 is adopted
7 LIBE Identical. Put to vote together
92 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
222 Julia Reda
Fall if CA 3 or AM 221 is adopted
14 Rapporteurs
Identical. Put to vote together
Fall if CA 3 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
224 Virginie Rozière
225 Daniel Dalton, Vicky
Ford
223 Marco Zullo
Falls if CA 3 or AM 221 is adopted
Compatible with the other AMs: put to
vote as addition
Recital 23
CA
40
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
GUE, Greens, EFDD
+
Do not put to vote: CA adopted/rejected
with the CA 38 (Article 5)
226 Jean-Marie Cavada Falls if CA 40 is adopted
227 Marco Zullo Falls if CA 40 or AM 226 is adopted
15 Rapporteurs
Falls if CA 40 or AM 226 or AM 227 is
adopted
228 Daniel Buda
Falls if CA 40 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
229 Eva Maydell
Falls if CA 40 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
230 Kaja Kallas, Dita
Charanzová
Identical. Put to vote together
Fall if CA 40 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
231 Antanas Guoga
232 Virginie Rozière
Recital 24 +
recital 25 +
recital 25a
(new)
CA
44
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
Greens, EFDD +
Do not put to vote: CA adopted/rejected
with the block vote on CAs 41/42 (Articles
6 and 6a (new))
Recital 24 16 Rapporteurs Deletion
93 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
233 Virginie Rozière
Identical. Put to vote together
Fall if CA 44 is adopted
234 Julia Reda
235 Marco Zullo
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
horizontal AMs 1/71/72
Recital 25 236 Virginie Rozière Falls if CA 44 is adopted
237 Julia Reda Falls if CA 44 or AM 236 is adopted
239 Marco Zullo
Falls if CA 44 or AM 236 or AM 237 is
adopted
17 Rapporteurs
Falls if CA 44 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
238 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Christel Schaldemose,
Lucy Anderson, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Anna
Hedh, Josef
Weidenholzer, Marc
Tarabella, Catherine
Stihler, Evelyn Regner
Falls if CA 44 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
8 LIBE
Falls if CA 44 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
240 Kaja Kallas, Dita
Charanzová
Falls if CA 44 is adopted
Compatible with the above AMs: put to
vote as addition
Recital 26
CA
45
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
GUE, Greens, EFDD
+
Do not put to vote: CA adopted/rejected
with the block vote on CAs 41/42 (Articles
6 and 6a (new))
18 Rapporteurs Falls if CA 45 is adopted
241 Julia Reda
Falls if CA 45 is adopted
Compatible with AM 18: put to vote as
addition
94 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
242 Constance Le Grip
Falls if CA 45 or AM 18 or AM 241 is
adopted.
243 Daniel Buda
Identical
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
horizontal AMs 1/71/72
244 Marco Zullo
Recital 27 +
recital 28a
(new)
CA
46 +
CA
48
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
EFDD +
Do not put to vote: CA adopted/rejected
with the block vote on CAs 41/42 (Articles
6 and 6a (new))
9 LIBE Falls if CA 46/48 is adopted
19 Rapporteurs
Identical. Put to vote together
Falls if CA 46/48 is adopted
Compatible with AM LIBE 9: put to vote
as addition
246 Daniel Dalton, Vicky
Ford
245 Marietje Schaake
Falls if CA 46/48 is adopted
Compatible with the above AMs: put to
vote as addition
Recital 28 CA
47
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
Greens, GUE
+
Do not put to vote: CA adopted/rejected
with the block vote on CAs 41/42 (Articles
6 and 6a (new))
247 Jean-Marie Cavada,
Kaja Kallas
Falls if CA 47 is adopted
Recital 29
CA
49
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
GUE, Greens, EFDD
+
Do not put to vote: CA adopted/rejected
with the block vote on CAs 41/42 (Articles
6 and 6a (new))
248 Kaja Kallas, Dita
Charanzová
Falls if CA 49 or AM 247 is adopted
249 Marco Zullo
Falls if CA 49 or AM 247 or AM 248 is
adopted
250 Axel Voss, Eva Falls if CA 49 is adopted
95 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
Maydell
Compatible with the above AMs: put to
vote as addition
252 Notis Marias
Falls if CA 49 is adopted
Compatible with the above AMs: put to
vote as addition
251 Daniel Buda
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
horizontal AMs 1/71/72
Recital 30 CA
51
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
GUE, Greens, EFDD
+
Do not put to vote: CA adopted/rejected
with CA 50 (Article 7)
253 Antanas Guoga
Falls if CA 51 is adopted
Recital 31 CA
53
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
GUE, Greens, EFDD
+
Do not put to vote: CA adopted/rejected
with CA 52 (Article 8)
254 Jean-Marie Cavada Falls if CA 53 is adopted
255 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
Falls if CA 53 or AM 254 is adopted
Recital 31 a
(new) 256 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Lucy Anderson, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Christel
Schaldemose, Maria
Grapini, Josef
Weidenholzer, Anna
Hedh, Marc Tarabella,
Catherine Stihler,
Evelyn Regner
If adopted, go to 357
Recital 32
CA
59
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE, +
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
CA 58 (Article 9)
CA
59a
Supported by Greens
and GUE
Alternative compromise: same as CA 59
without the sentence: “This time limit
should be reduced to one year in the case
of digital content or a digital service
96 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
embedded in goods”
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
CA 58a (Article 9)
257 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
Falls if CA 59 is adopted
258 Angelika Niebler Falls if CA 59 or AM 257 is adopted
259 Kaja Kallas, Dita
Charanzová
Falls if CA 59 or AM 257 or AM 258 is
adopted
260 Constance Le Grip
Falls if CA 59 or AM 257 or AM 258 is
adopted
Compatible with AM 259: vote as addition
261 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Christel Schaldemose,
Lucy Anderson, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Josef
Weidenholzer, Anna
Hedh, Marc Tarabella,
Catherine Stihler,
Evelyn Regner,
Virginie Rozière,
Marlene Mizzi,
Biljana Borzan
Falls if CA 59 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
262 Marco Zullo
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
horizontal AMs 1/71/72
Recital 33
CA
60
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
GUE, Greens
+
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
CA 58 (Article 9)
263 Andreas Schwab Falls if CA 60 is adopted
264 Julia Reda
Falls if CA 60 is adopted
Compatible with AM 263: vote as addition
265 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
Identical. Put to vote together
97 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
266 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Christel Schaldemose,
Liisa Jaakonsaari,
Lucy Anderson, Josef
Weidenholzer, Anna
Hedh, Marc Tarabella,
Catherine Stihler,
Evelyn Regner
Fall if CA 60 or AM 263 is adopted
Compatible with AM 264: vote as addition
267 Antanas Guoga
Fall if CA 60 is adopted
Compatible with any of the above AMs:
vote as addition
268 Marco Zullo
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
horizontal AMs 1/71/72
Recital 34
CA
56
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
Greens, EFDD
+
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
CA 55 (Article 10)
269 Jean-Marie Cavada,
Kaja Kallas
Falls if CA 56 is adopted
270 Angel Dzhambazki Falls if CA 56 or AM 269 is adopted
271 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
Identical. Put to vote together
Falls if CA 56 is adopted
Compatible with the above AMs: vote as
addition
272 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Virginie Rozière,
Marlene Mizzi, Olga
Sehnalová, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Christel
Schaldemose, Lucy
Anderson, Anna
Hedh, Josef
Weidenholzer, Marc
Tarabella, Catherine
Stihler, Biljana
Borzan, Evelyn
Regner
273 Daniel Buda Identical
98 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
274 Marco Zullo
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
horizontal AMs 1/71/72
Recital 34 a
(new)
275 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
Falls if CA 40 or CA 56 is adopted
276 Dietmar Köster
Falls if CA 56 is adopted
Recital 34 b
(new)
277 Dietmar Köster
Falls if CA 59 or Am 257, 258 or 259 is
adopted
Recital 35
CA
62
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
GUE, EFDD
+
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
CA 61 (Article 11)
278 Julia Reda Falls if CA 62 is adopted
279 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
Falls if CA 62 or AM 278 is adopted
280 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Marlene Mizzi, Lucy
Anderson, Christel
Schaldemose, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Olga
Sehnalová, Marc
Tarabella, Catherine
Stihler, Biljana
Borzan, Evelyn
Regner
Falls if CA 62 or AM 278 or AM 279 is
adopted
281 Daniel Buda
Identical
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
horizontal AMs 1/71/72
282 Marco Zullo
Recital 36 CA
65
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
GUE, EFDD
+
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
CA 63 (Article 12)
283 Evelyne Gebhardt, Deletion
99 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
Lucy Anderson,
Christel Schaldemose,
Liisa Jaakonsaari,
Anna Hedh, Josef
Weidenholzer, Marc
Tarabella, Catherine
Stihler, Evelyn Regner
Identical. Put to vote together
Falls if CA 65 is adopted
284 Virginie Rozière
285 Julia Reda Falls if CA 65 or AMs 283/284 adopted
286 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
Identical
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
horizontal AMs 1/71/72
287 Daniel Buda
288 Marco Zullo
Recital 36 a
(new)
289 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
Falls if CA 65 is adopted
Recital 36 a
(new)
290 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Virginie Rozière,
Anna Hedh, Lucy
Anderson, Christel
Schaldemose, Maria
Grapini, Olga
Sehnalová, Marc
Tarabella, Catherine
Stihler, Biljana
Borzan, Evelyn
Regner
Falls if CA 65 or AM 285 is adopted
Compatible with AM 289: vote as addition
Recital 37
CA
66
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
GUE, Greens, EFDD
+
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
CA 63 (Article 12)
291 Virginie Rozière
Deletion
Falls if CA 66 is adopted
294 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Virginie Rozière,
Lucy Anderson,
Falls if CA 66 or AM 291 is adopted
100 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
Christel Schaldemose,
Liisa Jaakonsaari,
Josef Weidenholzer,
Anna Hedh, Marc
Tarabella, Catherine
Stihler, Evelyn Regner
10
pc 1
LIBE
Identical. Put to vote together
Fall if CA 66 or AM 291 or AM 294 is
adopted
299
pc 1
Julia Reda
10
pc 2
LIBE
Identical. Put to vote together
Fall if CA 66 or CA 3 or AM 291 or AM
294 is adopted
Pc 2 concerns part on GDPR
299
pc 2
Julia Reda
292 Birgit Collin-Langen
Falls if CA 66 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
293 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
Falls if CA 66 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
295 Jean-Marie Cavada
Falls if CA 66 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
296 Angel Dzhambazki
Falls if CA 66 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
297 Kaja Kallas, Dita
Charanzová
Falls if CA 66 or AM 291, 292 or 293 is
adopted
Compatible with AMs 294, 295 and 296:
vote as addition
298 Marco Zullo
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
horizontal AMs 1/71/72
300 Constance Le Grip
Falls if CA 66 or AM 291, 293, 294, 295
or LIBE 10/AM 299 is adopted
Compatible with AMs 292, 296, 297, 298:
101 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
vote as addition
Recital 37 a
(new)
301 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
Falls if CA 3 is adopted
If adopted, go to 302
303 Birgit Collin-Langen
Falls if CA 3 or AM 301 is adopted
If adopted, go to 302
302 Vicky Ford, Daniel
Dalton
Falls if CA 3 is adopted
Compatible with AMs 301 and 303: vote
as addition
If adopted, go to 357
Recital 38
CA
71
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
GUE, Greens, EFDD
+
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
CA 63 (Articles 13, 13a, 13b and 13c)
304 Julia Reda Falls if CA 71 is adopted
305 Daniel Dalton, Vicky
Ford
Falls if CA 71 is adopted
Compatible with AM 304: vote as addition
306 Kaja Kallas, Dita
Charanzová
Falls if CA 71 is adopted
Compatible with the above AMs: vote as
addition
307 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Virginie Rozière,
Lucy Anderson, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Christel
Schaldemose, Anna
Hedh, Marc Tarabella,
Catherine Stihler,
Evelyn Regner
Falls if CA 71 is adopted
Compatible with the above AMs: vote as
addition
308 Jean-Marie Cavada
Falls if CA 71 or AM 307 is adopted
Compatible with the other AMs: vote as
addition
102 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
11 LIBE
Falls if CA 71 or AM 306 is adopted
Compatible with the other AMs: vote as
addition
Recital 39
CA
72
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
GUE, Greens, EFDD
+
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
CA 63 (Articles 13, 13a, 13b and 13c)
310 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
Identical. Put to vote together
Deletion
Falls if CA 72 is adopted
309 Antanas Guoga
313 Jean-Marie Cavada Falls if CA 72 or AMs 309/310 adopted
312 Daniel Dalton, Vicky
Ford
Falls if CA 72 or CA 3 or any of the above
AMs is adopted
311 Kaja Kallas, Dita
Charanzová
Falls if CA 72 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
12 LIBE
Identical. Put to vote together
Falls if CA 72 or AMs 309/310 are
adopted
Compatible with the other AMs: vote as
addition
317 Virginie Rozière
315 Angel Dzhambazki
Falls if CA 72 or AMs 309/310 are
adopted
Compatible with the other AMs: vote as
addition
316 Marco Zullo
Falls if CA 72 or AMs 309/310 or AM 312
adopted
Compatible with the other AMs: vote as
addition
314 Daniel Buda
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
horizontal AMs 1/71/72
103 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
Recital 40
CA
73
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
GUE, Greens, EFDD
+
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
CA 63 (Articles 13, 13a, 13b and 13c)
318 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell Deletion
Falls if CA 73 is adopted
319 Kaja Kallas, Dita
Charanzová
Falls if CA 73 or AM 318 is adopted
320 Angel Dzhambazki
Falls if CA 73 or AM 318 is adopted
Compatible with AM 319: vote as addition
Recital 41 CA
74
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
GUE, Greens, EFDD
+
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
CA 63 (Articles 13, 13a, 13b and 13c)
321 Angelika Niebler Falls if CA 74 is adopted
322 Daniel Buda
Identical
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
horizontal AMs 1/71/72
323 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
324 Marco Zullo
Recital 42
CA
75
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
GUE, Greens, EFDD
+
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
CA 63 (Articles 13, 13a, 13b and 13c)
328 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
Falls if CA 75 is adopted
326 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Lucy Anderson, Anna
Hedh, Christel
Schaldemose, Josef
Weidenholzer, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Catherine
Stihler, Marc
Tarabella, Evelyn
Regner
Falls if CA 75 or AM 328 is adopted
104 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
325 Daniel Buda
Identical
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
horizontal AMs 1/71/72
327 Marco Zullo
Recital 43
CA
57
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
GUE, Greens, EFDD
+
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
the CA 55 (Article 10)
335 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
Falls if CA 56 or CA 57 is adopted
332 Inese Vaidere
Falls if CA 56, CA 57 or AM 335 is
adopted
329 Kaja Kallas, Dita
Charanzová, Jean-
Marie Cavada
Falls if CA 56, CA 57, AM 335 or AM 332
is adopted
334 Angelika Niebler
Falls if CA 56, CA 57 or any of the above
AMs is adopted
330 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Lucy Anderson, Josef
Weidenholzer, Anna
Hedh, Christel
Schaldemose, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Marc
Tarabella, Catherine
Stihler, Biljana
Borzan, Evelyn
Regner
Falls if CA 56, CA 57 or any of the above
AMs is adopted
331 Notis Marias
Falls if CA 56, CA 57 or AM 330 or 332 is
adopted
Compatible with the other AMs: vote as
addition
333 Marco Zullo
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
horizontal AMs 1/71/72
Recital 44 CA
77
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
GUE, Greens, EFDD
+
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
CA 76 (Article 14)
105 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
336 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell Deletion
Falls if CA 77 is adopted
340 Antanas Guoga Falls if CA 77 or AM 336 is adopted
13 LIBE
Falls if CA 77 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
342 Antanas Guoga
Falls if CA 77 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
339 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Lucy Anderson, Anna
Hedh, Josef
Weidenholzer, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Marc
Tarabella, Evelyn
Regner
Falls if CA 77 or any of the above AMs is
adopted
337 Julia Reda
Falls if CA 77 or any of the above AMs is
adopted,
except AM 339: compatible, vote as
addition
338 Daniel Buda
Identical
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
horizontal AMs 1/71/72
341 Marco Zullo
Recital 45 +
recital 45a
(new)
CA
79
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
Greens, EFDD
+
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
CA 78 (Article 15)
343 Kaja Kallas, Dita
Charanzová
Falls if CA 79 is adopted
347 Angel Dzhambazki Falls if CA 79 or AM 343 is adopted
348 Constance Le Grip
Falls if CA 79 or AM 343 or AM 347 is
adopted
345 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
horizontal AMs 1/71/72
106 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
344 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Virginie Rozière,
Lucy Anderson, Anna
Hedh, Christel
Schaldemose, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Josef
Weidenholzer, Marc
Tarabella, Evelyn
Regner
346 Marco Zullo
Recital 46
CA
81
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ALDE, EFDD +
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
CA 80 (Article 16)
349 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell Deletion
Falls if CA 81 is adopted
350 Angel Dzhambazki Falls if CA 81 or AM 349 is adopted
353 Julia Reda
Falls if CA 81 or AM 349 or AM 350 is
adopted
351 Notis Marias
Falls if CA 81 or AM 349 is adopted
Compatible with AM 353: vote as addition
352 Marco Zullo
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
horizontal AMs 1/71/72
Recital 47
CA
83
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
GUE, Greens, EFDD
+
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
CA 82 (Article 17)
356 Kaja Kallas, Dita
Charanzová
Falls if CA 83 is adopted
354 Julia Reda Falls if CA 83 or AM 356 is adopted
355 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
horizontal AMs 1/71/72
Recital 47 a
(new) 357 Julia Reda, Kaja
Kallas
If adopted, go to 362
107 \ 168
Concerned text AM Author R.
pos. Remarks
Res
ult
of
vote
Recital 48 CA 83ter
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
GUE, Greens, EFDD
+
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
CA 83bis (Article 18)
358 Notis Marias Falls if CA 18ter is adopted
Recital 50
CA
85
Supported by EPP,
S&D, ECR, ALDE,
GUE, Greens, EFDD
+
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
CA 84 (Article 20)
359 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Virginie Rozière,
Lucy Anderson, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Anna
Hedh, Josef
Weidenholzer,
Christel Schaldemose,
Marc Tarabella,
Catherine Stihler,
Evelyn Regner
Falls if CA 85 is adopted
360 Virginie Rozière Falls if CA 85 or AM 359 is adopted
361 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
Falls if CA 85 or AM 359 is adopted
Compatible with AM 360: vote as addition
Recital 54 362 Notis Marias If adopted, go to 364
363 Axel Voss, Eva
Maydell
Do not put to vote: adopted/rejected with
horizontal AMs 1/71/72
Recital 54 a
(new) 364 Evelyne Gebhardt,
Kerstin Westphal,
Maria Grapini, Olga
Sehnalová, Josef
Weidenholzer,
Christel Schaldemose,
Lucy Anderson, Liisa
Jaakonsaari, Marc
Tarabella, Catherine
Stihler, Evelyn Regner
If adopted, go to LIBE 14
Recital 55 14 LIBE
108 \ 168
VOTE on the DRAFT REPORT as amended for against abstentions
109 \ 168
DIGITAL CONTENT PROPOSAL
COMPROMISE AMENDMENTS - FINAL
17 November 2017
1. Compromise amendments on data protection (Article -1 (new) and
Article 3(8) and recitals 17, 22 and 22a (new))
CA 1 on Article -1 (new) and Article 3(8)
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, Greens, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including: 181 (Gebhardt et al.),
182 (Voss/Maydell), 183 (Cavada), 184 cp 1 (Gebhardt et al.), 197 (Voss/Maydell), 200
(Marias), LIBE 6, 212 (Reda), 213 (Maydell), LIBE 10 pc 2, 299 pc 2 (Reda), 301
(Voss/Maydell), 302 (Ford/Dalton), 303 (Collin-Langen), 312 (Dalton/Ford), LIBE 21, AMs
41 (Rapporteurs), 416 (Mizzi), 415 (Voss/Maydell), 417 (Reda), 418 (Guoga), 442 (Reda),
479 (Dalton/ford), 502 (Grapini), 503 (Reda), 504 (Dalton, Ford), 505 (Maydell, Schwab),
506 (Guoga), 43 (Rapporteurs), 515 (Zullo), LIBE 24, 548 (Reda), 593 (Reda), 759 (Kallas,
Charanzová), 790 (Reda), 791 (Dalton/Ford), 792 (Guoga), 798 (Mizzi), 807 (Dalton/Ford),
852 (Voss/Maydell), 853 (Gebhardt et al.), 901 (Dalton/Ford), 935 (Reda), 936
(Dalton/Ford), 962 (Guoga), 975 (Reda)
Article -1
Data protection
This Directive is without prejudice to the rules on protection of individuals with regard to
the processing of personal data as granted by or in compliance with, in particular,
Regulation (EU) 2016/679.
Article 3, paragraph 8
8. This Directive is without prejudice to the protection of individuals with regard to the
processing of personal data.
CA 2 on recital 17
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, Greens, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including AMs 13 (co-
Rapporteurs), 208 (Cavada), 209 (Marias), 210 (Zullo), 5 LIBE
(17) Digital content is highly relevant in the context of the Internet of Things. This
Directive should apply to Internet of Things devices. However it is opportune to
110 \ 168
address specific issues of liability related to the Internet of Things, including the
liability for data and machine-to-machine contracts, in a separate way.
CA 3 on recitals 22 and 22a (new)
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, Greens, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including AMs 14 (co-
Rapporteurs), 197 (Voss/Maydell), 221 (Maydell), 222 (Reda), 223 (Zullo), 224 (Rozière),
225 (Dalton/Ford), LIBE 7
(22) The protection of individuals with regard to The pursuit of activities falling within
the scope of this Directive involves the processing of personal data is. This Directive
is without prejudice to the rules of Union law applicable to the processing of
personal data within the Union, in particular Regulation (EU) 2016/679 governed
by Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council1is and by
Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council2 which govern
the processing of personal data carried out in the Member States under the
supervision of the Member States' competent authorities, in particular the public
independent authorities designated by the Member States are fully applicable in the
context of contracts for the supply of digital content. Those Directives legal acts
already establish a legal framework in the field of personal data in the Union and are
fully applicable in the context of contracts for the supply of digital content or digital
services. The implementation and application of this Directive should be made in full
compliance with that legal framework.
(22a) The scope of this Directive includes 'Internet of Things’ applications, which are
often designed to be contextually aware of the needs and desires of the user,
collecting information about their daily practices and routines, whilst remaining
invisible in use and unremarkable to users. Although consumers may at least have
had a chance to read the privacy policy of their IoT device before signing the
contract, these privacy policies are not always understandable. Moreover, IoT
devices are routinely designed with poor encryption strength or none at all and a
lack of other security features and rely heavily on wireless communications
protocols which lack mandatory technical and security standards. Consumers
generally have no idea about IoT security and as a result default passwords are
often installed in household appliances, never changed and routinely compromised.
This Directive in conjunction with the core principles of the Regulation (EU)
2016/679 mandates civil liability when IoT devices fail to include privacy in the
architecture of the product, as contract terms which violate any right which has
been afforded to the consumer as a data subject under Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of
the European Parliament and of the Council should not be binding.
1 OJ L 281, 23/11/1995, p. 31 - 50) [to be replaced by the General Data Protection Regulation, once adopted]. 2 OJ L 201, 31.7.2002, p. 37–47.
111 \ 168
2. Compromise amendments on subject matter (Article 1 and related
recitals)
CA 4 on Article 1
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, Greens, EFDD
Compromise Amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including AMs 20 (draft
report), 365 (Maydell/Schwab), 366 (Mizzi), 367 (Guoga), 368 (Buda), 369 (Gebhardt et al.),
370 (Rozière), 371 (Zullo)
Article 1
Subject matter
This The purpose of this Directive is, through the achievement of a high level of consumer
protection, to contribute to the proper functioning of the internal market by laying lays
down certain requirements concerning contracts for the supply of digital content or digital
services to between traders and consumers, in particular rules on conformity of digital
content or digital services with the contract, remedies in case of failure to supply digital
content or digital services or the lack of such conformity and the modalities for the exercise
of those remedies as well as on modification of the digital content or digital service and
termination of such long-term contracts.
CA 5 on recital 1
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, Greens, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including amendments 2
(Rapporteurs), 73 (Troszczynski), 74 (Mizzi), 75 (Grappini), 76 (Dalton/Ford), 77 (Buda), 78
(Zullo)
(1) The growth potential of e-commerce in the Union has not yet been fully exploited
realised. The Digital Single Market Strategy for Europe² tackles in a holistic manner the
major obstacles to the development of cross-border e-commerce in the Union in order to
unleash this potential. Ensuring better access for consumers to digital content and facilitating
businesses to supply digital content is necessary to boost the Union’s digital economy and
stimulate overall growth.
CA 6 on recital 2
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, Greens, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including amendments 3
(Rapporteurs), 81 (Troszczynski), 82 (Gebhardt et al.), 83 (Buda), 84 (Dalton), 85 (Marias),
86 (Cavada), 87 (Guoga), 88 (Grapini), 89 (Zullo), 90 (Pospisil), 91 (Maydell), 92
112 \ 168
(Negrescu), LIBE 1
(2) For the achievement of To achieve a genuine digital single market, the harmonisation
of certain aspects concerning contracts for supply of digital content or digital services should
be harmonised, taking as a base a high level of consumer protection, is necessary. to increase
legal certainty and to reduce transaction costs.
CA 7 on recital 3
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, Greens, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including amendments 4
(Rapporteurs), 93 (Troszczynski), 94 (Gebhardt et al.), 95 (Maydell), 96 (Buda), 97 (Zullo),
98 (Dalton), 99 (Marias), 100 (Grapini), 101 (Pospisil)
(3)(4) Differences in national mandatory consumer contract law rules and a lack of clear
contract law rules are among the key obstacles which hinder the development of the supply of
digital content, as very few tailor-made rules exist at Union level. Businesses face additional
costs stemming from differences in national mandatory consumer contract law rules and legal
uncertainty when selling digital content across borders. Businesses, especially small and
medium-sized enterprises ('SMEs'), also face costs when adapting their contracts to specific
mandatory rules for the supply of digital content or digital services which are already
emerging in several Member States, creating differences in scope and content between
specific national rules governing these contracts. In those Member States where there are not
yet specific rules for the supply of digital content or digital services, traders willing to sell
cross-border face uncertainty, as they will often not know which rules apply to digital content
or digital services in the Member State they want to export to, nor the content of those rules
and whether they are mandatory.
CA 8 on recital 4
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, Greens, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including amendments 5
(Rapporteurs), 102 (Maydell), 103 (Troszczynski), 104 (Buda), 105 (Pospíšil), 106 (Zullo),
107 (Rozière), 108 (Dalton)
(4)(3) Consumers are not always confident when buying cross border and especially online.
One of the major factors for this lack of confidence is uncertainty about their key contractual
rights and the lack of a clear contractual framework for digital content or digital services.
Many consumers of digital content experience problems related to the quality of, or access to,
digital content or digital services. For instance, they receive wrong or faulty digital content or
digital services, or they are not able to access the digital content or digital service in question.
As a result, consumers suffer financial and non-financial detriment.
CA 9 on recital 8
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, Greens, EFDD
113 \ 168
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including amendments 135
(Reda), 136 (Gebhardt et al.), 137 (Cavada), 138 (Le Grip), 139 (Voss), 140 (Guoga), 141
(Marias), 142 (Rozière), 143 (Zullo)
(8) This Directive should fully harmonise a set of certain key rules that are so far not
regulated at Union or national level. It should include therefore rules on conformity of the
digital content or digital services, remedies available to consumers in cases of lack of
conformity of digital content or digital services with the contract and certain modalities for
the exercise of those remedies. This Directive should also harmonise certain aspects
concerning the right to terminate a long-term contract, as well as certain aspects concerning
the modification of the digital content or digital services.
CA 10 on recital 9
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, Greens, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including amendments 144
(Gebhardt et al.), 145 (Troszczynski), 146 (Reda), 147 (Buda), 148 (Voss), 149 (Rozière),
150 (Anderson et al.)
(9) By fully harmonising all the requirements related to the topics matters regulated by
this Directive, it precludes Member States, within its scope of application, from providing
any further formal or substantive requirements, such as a period during which the lack of
conformity has to become apparent, any rules on the reversal of the burden of proof
different from what is provided for in this Directive or an obligation for the consumer to
notify the supplier trader of a lack of conformity within a specific period or an obligation for
the consumer to pay for the use of the digital content until the moment of termination because
of a lack of conformity with the contract.
CA 11 on Recital 10a (new)
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including amendments 8
(Rapporteurs), 153 (Reda)
(10a) This Directive should not affect provisions of national laws governing the
conditions under which a contract for the supply of digital content or digital services is
considered to be linked with or ancillary to another contract which the consumer has
concluded with the supplier or another trader, and the effect this has on either contract or
on the remedies to be exercised under either contract. Member States should also be free to
determine the nature of such contracts, which could be, inter alia, sales, services, rental or
sui generis contracts.
Note: to be combined with recital 20 on bundles, which would become recital 10b
114 \ 168
3. Compromise amendments on delineation of scope vis-à-vis the Goods
Proposal (definitions and scope provisions)
CA 12 on definitions of ‘digital content’ and ‘digital service’ (Article 2, points 1 and 1a
(new))
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, Greens, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including: AMs 21, 22 and 25
draft report (Gebhardt/Voss); AMs 372-373, 378, 383, 391 (Rozière), 374, 402 (Le Grip),
375, 382, 387, 401 (Guoga), 376 (Juvin), 377 and 379, 384, 389 (Buda), 380, 385, 388
(Zullo), 381, 386, 390 (Reda), 400 (Dalton/Ford), 403 (De Jong)
Article 2, point 1 : ‘digital content’
1. 'digital content' means
(a) data which is produced and supplied in digital form, for example
video, audio, applications, digital games and any other software;
(b) a service allowing the creation, processing or storage of data in
digital form, where such data is provided by the consumer, and
(c) a service allowing sharing of and any other interaction with data in
digital form, provided by other users of the service;
Article 2, point 1 a (new) : ‘digital service’
1a. 'digital service' means
(a) a service allowing the creation, processing or storage of data in
digital form, where such data are uploaded or created by the
consumer, or
(b) a service allowing sharing of and any other interaction with data
in digital form uploaded or created by the consumer and/or by other
users of the service;
CA 13 on definition ‘embedded digital content’ (Article 2, point 1b (new))
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, Greens, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including: AMs 24 and 30 draft
report (Gebhardt/Voss), AMs 392, 441 (Dalton/Ford), 393 (Thun/Zwiefka), 394 (Rozière),
397 (Maydell/Schwab), 398 (Schaake), 399 (Reda/Kallas)
1b. ‘embedded digital content or digital service’ means digital content or a
digital service pre-installed in a good;
CA 14 on Article 3, paragraph 3 (scope, embedded digital content)
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, Greens, EFDD
115 \ 168
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including: AM 33 draft report
(Gebhardt/Voss); AMs 461 (Rozière), 462 (Zullo), 463 (Thun, Zwiefka), 464 (Gebhardt et
al.), 465 (Guoga); AM 34 draft report (Gebhardt/Voss); AMs 466 (Maydell, Arimont,
Schwab), 467 (Schwab), 468 (Rozière), 469 (Zullo), 470 (Thun, Zwiefka)
3. With the exception of Articles 5 and 11, this Directive shall apply to any durable
medium incorporating digital content where the durable medium has been used
exclusively as carrier of digital content embedded digital content or embedded digital
services. Unless otherwise provided, references to digital content or digital services
in this Directive also cover embedded digital content or embedded digital services.
As regards goods with embedded digital content or embedded digital services, the
trader shall be liable under this Directive to the consumer for meeting his
obligations only in respect of the embedded digital content or digital service. The
rules of this Directive are without prejudice to the protection granted to consumers
by the applicable Union law with respect to other elements of such goods.
CA 15 on Recital 11 - inclusion of instant messaging services to the extent that they are
not covered by the EECC (OTTs)
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, Greens, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including: AM 9 draft report
(Gebhardt/Voss); AMs 154 (Rozière), 155 (Reda), 156 (Buda), 157 (Maydell, Voss,
Arimont), 158 (Zullo), 159 (Dalton, Ford), 160 (Kallas, Charanzová), 161 (Guoga), 162
(Schaake), LIBE 3, 163 (Marias)
(11) The This Directive should address problems across different categories of
digital content or digital services and its their supply. In order to cater for fast
technological developments and to maintain the future-proof nature of ensure
consistency with the acquis, the notion of digital content this notion as used in this
Directive should be broader than correspond with that used in Directive 2011/83/EU
of the European Parliament and of the Council30 and should cover, for example, text,
video, audio, applications, digital games and any other software. In order to cater
for fast technological developments and to make this Directive future-proof, in
particular it should also cover digital services which allow the creation, processing or
storage of data and services which allow the sharing of data in digital form,
including number-independent interpersonal communication services to the extent
that they are not regulated in the European Electronic Communications Code3.
While there are numerous ways for digital content or digital services to be supplied,
such as transmission on a durable CD, DVD and similar medium, downloading by
consumers on their devices, web-streaming, allowing access to storage capabilities of
digital services or access to the use of social media, this Directive should apply to all
digital content or digital services independently of the medium used for its their
transmission. Differentiating between different categories in this technologically fast
changing market is not desirable because it would hardly be possible to avoid
3 Directive xx/xx/EU of [date] the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European
Electronic Communications Code [recast], OJ L xx, [date], p. x-x.
116 \ 168
discriminations between suppliers traders. A level playing field between suppliers
traders of different categories of digital content or digital services should be ensured.
However this directive should not apply to digital content which is embedded in
goods in such way that it operated as an integral part of the goods and its functions are
subordinate to the main functionalities of the goods.
CA 16 on Recital 12
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, Greens, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including: AM 10 draft report
(Gebhardt/Voss); AMs 164 (Guoga), 165 (Maydell, Arimont), 166 (Rozière), 167 (Zullo),
168 (Gebhardt et al.), 169 (Thun, Zwiefka), 170 (Reda), 171 (Dalton, Ford)
(12) In order to meet the expectations of consumers and ensure a clear-cut and
simple legal framework for suppliers traders of goods in which digital content offered
on a durable medium or a digital service is embedded, in relation to conformity
requirements and remedies available to consumers for non-conformity, this Directive
should apply to digital content or digital services pre-installed in goods, such as
DVDs and CDs incorporating digital content in such a way that the goods function
only as a carrier of the digital content or ‘smart goods’. As regards such goods, the
trader should be liable under this Directive to the consumer for meeting his
obligations only in respect of the embedded digital content or digital service.
Liability for the other elements of those goods should be governed by the applicable
law. , The This Directive should apply to digital content supplied on a durable
medium, embedded digital content or services independently whether it is sold the
goods in which they are pre-installed are supplied at a distance or in face-to-face
situations, so as to avoid fragmentation between the different distribution channels.
The Directive 2011/83/EU should continue to apply to those goods, including the
obligations related to the delivery of goods, remedies in case of the failure to deliver
and the nature of the contract under which those goods are supplied; hence, the rules
on supply of and failure to supply digital content or digital services of the present
Directive do not apply to embedded digital content and embedded digital services.
The This Directive is also without prejudice to the distribution right applicable to
these those goods under copyright law.
117 \ 168
4. Compromises on remaining definitions (Article 2 and related recitals)
CA 17 on Article 2, point 2, definition of ‘integration’
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, Greens, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including: AM 23 (co-
rapporteurs), AM 395 (Zullo), AM 396 (Guoga)
2. 'integration' means linking together and incorporating digital content or a digital
service with the different components of a the consumer’s digital environment to act as a
coordinated whole in conformity with its intended purpose in order for the digital content or
digital service to be used in accordance with the contract;
CA 18 on definitions of ‘trader’ and ‘consumer’; recital on dual purpose contracts
(Article 2, points 3 and 4 and recital 7a (new))
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, Greens, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including: AM 25
(Rapporteurs), 400 (Dalton/Ford), 401 (Guoga), 402 (Le Grip), 403 (De Jong), 26
(Rapporteurs), 404 (Guoga), 405 (Reda)
Article 2, point 3: ‘trader’
3. “supplier” 'trader' means any natural or legal person, irrespective of whether
privately or publicly owned, who is acting, including through any other person
acting in his name or on his behalf, for purposes relating to that person’s trade,
business, craft, or profession in relation to contracts covered by this
Directive;
Article 2, point 4: ‘consumer’
4. 'consumer' means any natural person who in contracts covered by this
Directive, is acting for purposes which are outside that person's trade,
business, craft, or profession;
CA 19 on dual purpose contracts (recital 7a (new))
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, Greens, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including amendment 7
(Rapporteurs)
(7a) This Directive should also apply to dual purpose contracts, where the
contract is concluded for purposes partly within and partly outside the person's
trade and the trade purpose is marginal within the overall context of the contract,
so that that person should also be considered a consumer.
118 \ 168
CA 20 on Article 2, point 5, definition of ‘damages’
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, Greens, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including: LIBE 17, AM 406
(Voss, Maydell), AM 407 (Reda), AM 408 (Guoga), AM 409 (Roziere), AM 410 (Gebhardt
et al.)
5. 'damages' means a sum of money to which consumers may be entitled as
compensation for economic damage to their digital environment detriment caused
by a failure to supply the digital content or digital service or a lack of conformity
of the digital content or digital service with the contract;
CA 21 on Article 2, point 6, definition of ‘price’
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, Greens, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including: AM 411 (Voss,
Maydell), AM 412 (Mizzi), AM 413 (Guoga), AM 414 (Zullo)
6. 'price' means money that is due in exchange for digital content or a digital service
supplied;
CA 22 on Article 2, point 8, definition of ‘digital environment’
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, Greens, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including: AM 27 (co-
rapporteurs), AM 421 (Zullo), AM 422 (Guoga), AM 423 (Reda), AM 424 Dalton, Ford),
AM 425 (Kallas, Charanzova)
8. 'digital environment' means hardware, digital content software and any network
connection to the extent that it is within the control of the user and used by the
consumer to access or make use of digital content or a digital service;
CA 23 on recital 18
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, Greens, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including: LIBE 6, AM 211
(Voss, Maydell), AM 212 (Reda)
(18) Contracts may include general terms and conditions of the supplier trader that need to
be accepted by the consumer. For some digital content services, suppliers traders
often describe the service and measurable service targets in a service level agreement.
These service level agreements are generally appended to the main contract and form
an important component of the contractual relationship between the supplier trader
119 \ 168
and the consumer. They should be covered by the definition of a contract under this
Directive, and should thus comply with the rules laid down therein.
Note: the words “the definition of a contract under” will be deleted if AM 420 (deleting the
definition of “contract” in Article 2, point 7) is adopted
120 \ 168
5. Compromise amendments on data as counter-performance / any other
data (scope) (Article 3, paragraphs 1 and 4 and related recitals)
CA 24 on Article 3(1), scope and Article 3(4), data as counter-performance/any other
data
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including: AM 419 (Gebhardt et
al.), AM 443 (Schaake), AM 446 (Rozière), AM 448 (Buda), AM 449 (Maydell et al.), AM
450 (Zullo), AM 451 (Cavada), AM 452 (Gebhardt et al.), AM 454 (Guoga), AM 455 (Kallas
et al.), AM 456 (Vaidere),
Article 3
Scope
1. This Directive shall apply to any contract where the supplier trader supplies or
undertakes to supply digital content or a digital service to the consumer or
undertakes to do so and, in exchange, whether through the payment of a price is to
be paid or under the condition that personal data is provided by the consumer
actively provides counter-performance other than money in the form of personal
data or any other data or collected by the trader or a third party in the interest of
the trader.
[...]
4. This Directive shall not apply where personal data provided by the consumer or
collected by the trader is exclusively processed by the trader for supplying, keeping
in conformity or improving this to digital content or service or for the trader to
comply with provided against counter-performance other than money to the extent
the supplier requests the consumer to provide personal data the processing of which
is strictly necessary for the performance of the contract or for meeting legal
requirements to which and the supplier trader is subject, and the trader does not
further process this data for any other purpose. in a way incompatible with this
purpose. It shall equally not apply to any other data the supplier requests the
consumer to provide for the purpose of ensuring that the digital content is in
conformity with the contract or of meeting legal requirements, and the supplier does
not use that data for commercial purposes.
CA 25 on recital 13, data provided by the consumer and collected by the trader: general
considerations
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, Greens
121 \ 168
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including: AM 11 (co-
Rapporteurs), AM 175 (Kallas et al.), AM 176 (Maydell et al.), AM 177 (Guoga), AM 178
(Zullo), AM 179 (Buda), AM 180 (Cavada)
(13) In the digital economy, information about individuals is often and increasingly
seen by market participants as having a value comparable to money. Digital content is
often Specific business models have developed, where traders supply digital content
or a digital service and the consumer is required supplied not in exchange for a price
but against counter-performance other than money to provide or give access to
personal data. i.e. by giving access to personal data or other data. Those specific
business models already apply in different forms in a considerable part of the market.
This Directive does not intend to decide on whether such contracts should be
allowed or not and leaves to national law the question of validity of contracts for the
supply of digital content or a digital service where personal data are provided or
accessed. This Directive should, in no way, give the impression that it legitimises or
encourages a practice based on monetisation of personal data, as personal data
cannot be compared to a price, and therefore cannot be considered as a commodity.
However, Iintroducing a differentiation in the rules applying to monetary and non-
monetary transactions would provide an unjustified incentive for businesses to move
towards offering favour the supply of digital content or digital services against data
with the condition that personal data is provided. A level playing field should be
ensured. In addition, defects of the performance features of the digital content or
digital service supplied against counter-performance other than money when there is
no price paid may have an impact on the economic interests of consumers. With a
view to ensuring a level playing-field and a high level of consumer protection, Therefore the applicability of the rules of this Directive should not depend on whether
a price is paid for the specific digital content or digital service in question.
CA 26 on recital 14, data provided by the consumer and collected by the trader: scope
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, Greens
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including: AM 185 (Gebhardt et
al.), 187 (Dalton/Ford/Van Bossuyt), AM 188 (Reda), AM 189 (Voss/Maydell), AM 190
(Kallas et al.), AM 191 (Guoga), AM 192 (Roziere), AM 193 (Zullo), AM 194 (Collin-
Langen), AM 195 (Marias), 196 (Voss/Maydell)
(14) As regards digital content and digital services supplied not in exchange for a price but
against counter-performance other than money when provision of personal data is
required, this Directive should apply only to contracts where the supplier trader
requests and the consumer actively provides personal data, as well as where the
trader collects personal data. It would include for example such as the name and e-
mail address or photos, provided directly or indirectly to the supplier trader, for
example through individual registration or on the basis of a contract which allows
access to consumers' photos, or personal data collected by the trader, such as the IP
address. This Directive should not apply to situations where the supplier trader
collects personal data necessary for exclusively to supply, keep in conformity or
122 \ 168
improve the digital content or a digital service to function in conformity with the
contract, for example geographical location where necessary for a mobile application
to function properly, or for the sole purpose of meeting legal requirements, for
instance where the registration of the consumer is required for security and
identification purposes by applicable laws. This Directive should also not apply to
situations where the supplier collects information, including personal data, such as the
IP address, or other automatically generated information such as information collected
and transmitted by a cookie, without the consumer actively supplying it, even if the
consumer accepts the cookie. It should also not apply to situations where the
consumer is exposed to advertisements exclusively in order to gain access to digital
content or digital service.
CA 27 on recital 19
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, Greens, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including: AM 214 (Guoga),
AM 215 (Voss, Maydell)
(19) This Directive should apply only to those services whose main subject matter is
providing digital content services. Therefore, the Directive should not apply to
services, which are performed personally by the supplier trader and where the digital
means are only used for access or delivery purposes, such as a translation offered by a
person or other professional advice services where only the output of the service is
delivered to the consumer by digital means.
123 \ 168
6. Compromise amendments on remaining provisions on scope (Article 3
and related recitals)
CA 28 on Article 3, paragraph 2: content developed according to consumer’s
specifications
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, Greens, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including: AM 32 (co-
rapporteurs), AM 457 (Zullo), AM 458 (Roziere), AM 459 (Kallas, Charanzova)
2. This Directive shall apply to any contract for the supply of digital product content or
digital services developed according to the consumer's specifications.
CA 29 on recital 16: content developed according to consumer’s specifications
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, Greens, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including: AM 12 (co-
rapporteurs), AM 205 (Zullo), AM 206 (Reda), AM 207 (Buda)
(16) In order to ensure a common set of rights for consumers and a level playing field for
businesses, consumers should have the same remedies for digital content or digital services
which is are not in conformity with the contract irrespective of the way in which the content
or service has been developed. Consequently the this Directive should apply to contracts for
the development of digital content or digital services tailor-made to the specific requirements
of the consumer including tailor-made software. This Directive should also apply to the
supply of visual modelling files required in the context of 3D printing. However this
Directive should not regulate goods produced with the use of 3D printing technology or the
damage caused to them.
CA 30 on Article 3, paragraph 5 (including OTTs)
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, Greens, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including: AM 36-38 (co-
rapporteurs), AM 481 (Zullo), AM 482 (Schwab), AM 483 (Maydell), AM 484 (Buda), AM
485 (Guoga), AM 486 (Roziere), AM 487 (Roziere), AM 488 (Gebhardt et al.), AM 489
[MD1](Reda, Charanzova, Kallas), AM 490 (Karas), AM 491 (Juvin), AM 492 (Schwab), AM
493 (Buda)
5. This Directive shall not apply to contracts regarding:
(a) services performed personally with a predominant element of human
intervention by the supplier trader and where the digital format means is are
only used mainly as a carrier for access or delivery purposes;
124 \ 168
(a) interpersonal communication services electronic communication services as
defined in Directive 2002/21/EC the European Electronic Communications
Code, with the exception of number-independent interpersonal
communication services to the extent that those are not regulated in the
European Electronic Communications Code;
(b) healthcare as defined in point (a) of Article 3 of Directive 2011/24/EU;
(c) gambling services meaning services which involve wagering a stake with
monetary value in games of chance, including those with an element of skill,
such as lotteries, casino games, poker games and betting transactions, by
electronic means and at the individual request of a recipient of a service;
(d) financial services.
CA 31 on Article 3, paragraph 6: additional contractual obligations
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, Greens, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including: AM 39 (co-
rapporteurs), AM 494 (Buda), AM 495 (Maydell), AM 496 (Guoga), AM 497 (Roziere), AM
498 (Zullo), AM 499 (Cavada)
6. Where a contract includes elements in addition to for the supply of digital content
or digital service includes additional contractual obligations, this Directive shall
only apply to the rights and obligations and remedies of the parties as supplier
trader and consumer of the digital content or digital service.
CA 32 on recital 20: bundles, including OTTs
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including: AM 216
(Voss/Maydell)
(20) However, without prejudice to the European Electronic Communications Code,
where, under a contract or a bundle of contracts, the supplier trader offers digital
content or a digital service in combination with other services such as
telecommunication interpersonal communication services or goods, which do not
function merely as a carrier of and the digital content or digital service is not pre-
installed in the goods, this Directive should only apply to the digital content or digital
service component of such a bundle. The other elements should be governed by the
applicable law.
Note: if adopted, to become recital 10b
125 \ 168
CA 33 on Article 3, paragraph 7: sector-specific legislation
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, Greens, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including: LIBE 20, AM 40
(co-rapporteurs), AM 500 (Maydell), AM 501 (Guoga)
7. If any provision of this Directive conflicts with a provision of another Union act
governing a specific sector or subject matter, the provision of that other Union act
shall take precedence over this Directive prevail and apply to this specific sector or
subject matter.
CA 34 on Recital 21: copyright
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, Greens, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including: AM 217 (Marias),
AM 218 (Reda, Kallas), AM 219 (Voss, Maydell), AM 220 (Cavada)
(21) This Directive should not deal with copyright and other intellectual property related
aspects of the supply of digital content or digital services. Therefore it should be
without prejudice to any rights and obligations according to copyright law and other
intellectual property laws.
126 \ 168
7. Compromise amendments on level of harmonisation - general provision
(Article 4 and related recitals)
CA 35 on Article 4, level of harmonisation
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, GUE, Greens, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including amendments 509
(gebhardt et al.), 510 (Troszczynski), 511 (de Jong), 512 (Reda), 513 (Buda), 514
(Dalton/Ford)
Article 4
Level of harmonisation
Member States shall not maintain or introduce, in their national law, provisions diverging
from those laid down in this Directive, including more or less stringent provisions to ensure a
different level of consumer protection, unless otherwise provided for in this Directive.
See as well specific provisions where Member States can maintain into force existing
provisions after entry into force of this Directive, in:
- Article 10 and recital 34 on duration of the legal guarantee for embedded digital content
and digital services (under point 3, below)
- Article 3(9) and recital 10 on ‘hidden defects’ and ‘short-term right to reject’ (under point
6, below).
CA 36 on recital 5
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, Greens, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including amendments 6
(Rapporteurs), 109 (Troszczynski), 110 (Gebhardt et al.), 111 (Reda), 112 (Mizzi), 113
(Ford), 114 (Buda), 115 (Negrescu), 116 (Rozière), 117 (Zullo), 118 (Maydell)
(5) In order to remedy these problems, both businesses and consumers should be able to
rely on fully harmonised rules of some key regulatory aspects for the supply of digital
content or digital services setting out Union-wide contractual rights which are essential for
this type of transactions, whilst allowing Member States to maintain national rules in
relation to certain other aspects. In doing so, the ambition of this Directive is to strike the
right balance between a high level of consumer protection and the competitiveness of
enterprises, while ensuring respect for the principle of subsidiarity.
CA 37 on recitals 6 and 7
127 \ 168
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, Greens, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including amendments 119
(Troszczynski), 120 (Gebhardt et al.), 121 (Reda), 122 (Maydell), 123 (Marias), 124 (Buda),
125 (Rozière), 126 (Zullo), 127 (Troszczynski), 128 (Gebhardt et al.), 129 (Reda), 130
(Voss), 131 (Buda), 132 (Rozière), 133 (Zullo), 134 (Marias), LIBE 2
(6) Fully h Harmonised consumer contract law rules in all Member States will make it
easier for businesses to offer digital content cross-border. They will have a stable contract
law environment when selling online and otherwise at a distance to other Member States.
Fully harmonised rules specific for digital content throughout the EU will remove the
complexity caused by the different national rules that currently apply to contracts for the
supply of digital content. They will also prevent legal fragmentation that otherwise would
arise from new national legislations regulating specifically digital content.
(7) Consumers will should benefit from fully harmonised rights for digital content and
digital services at a high level of protection. They will should have clear mandatory rights
when they receive or access digital content or digital services from anywhere in the
EUUnion. This will should increase their confidence in buying digital content or digital
services. This will should also contribute to reducing the detriment consumers currently
suffer, since there will be a set of clear rights that will enable them to address problems they
face with digital content or digital services.
128 \ 168
8. Compromise amendments on supply of the digital content/service
CA 38 on Article 5, supply of digital content/digital service
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, Greens, EFDD
Compromise amendment on Article 5 replacing all relevant amendments including
amendments 44-48 (co-rapporteurs), AM 518 (Buda), AM 519 (Maydell), AM 520 (Zullo),
AM 521 (Roziere), AM 522 (Buda), AM 523 (Zullo), AM 524 (Le Grip), AM 525 (Roziere),
AM 526 (Le Grip), AM 527 (Le Grip), AM 528 (Buda), AM 529 -531 (Zullo), AM 532 (Le
Grip), AM 533 (Maydell), AM 534 (Buda), AM 535 (Gebhardt et al.), AM 536 (Zullo), AM
537 (Guoga), AM 538 (Kallas/Charanzova),
Article 5
Supply of the digital content or digital service
1. When performing the contract for the supply of digital content, the supplier trader
shall supply the digital content or digital service by making it available or giving access to
(a) the consumer; or
(b) a third party which operates a physical or virtual facility making the digital content or
digital service available to the consumer or allowing the consumer to access it and which has
been chosen by the consumer for receiving the digital content or digital service; or
(c) any other party designated by the consumer.
2. Unless the parties have agreed otherwise, the supplier trader shall supply the digital
content or digital service without undue delay after the conclusion of the contract. The
supply shall be deemed to take place trader shall have complied with his obligation to
supply when the digital content or digital service is supplied made available or is made
accessible to the consumer or, where point (b) or (c) of paragraph 1 applies, to the third party
chosen by the consumer, whichever is the earlier applicable.
CA 39 on Article 2, point 10, definition of ‘supply’
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, Greens, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including: AM 29, AM 436 (Le
grip), AM 437 (Buda), AM 438 (Zullo), AM 439 (Roziere)
10. 'supply' means providing access to digital content or digital services or making digital
content or digital services available;
129 \ 168
CA 40 on recital 23
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, Greens, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments including: AM 15 (co-
rapporteurs), AM 226 (Cavada), AM 227 (Zullo), AM 228 (Buda), AM 229 (Maydell), AM
230 (Kallas/Charanzova), AM 231 (Guoga), AM 232 (Roziere), 275 (Voss/Maydell)
(23) There are various ways for digital content or digital services to reach consumers or to
be made accessible to them. It is opportune to set simple and clear rules as to the modalities
and the time for performing the supplier’s trader main contractual obligation to supply digital
content or a digital service to the consumer. Considering that the supplier trader is not in
principle responsible for acts or omissions of an internet provider or an electronic platform
which the consumer selected for receiving the digital content or digital service, it should be
sufficient for the supplier trader to supply the digital content or digital service to this third
party or to any other party designated by the consumer. With regard to the time of supply, in
line with market practices and technical possibilities, the digital content or digital service
should be supplied immediately without undue delay after the conclusion of the contract,
unless the parties decide to agree otherwise in order to cater for other supply models.
130 \ 168
9. Compromise amendments on conformity criteria (Articles 5a, 6 and 6a,
Article 2(1)(9) and Articles 7, 8, and 8a and related recitals)
CA 40bis on Article 5a (new): chapeau article
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, Greens, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments including: AM 50 (Rapporteurs),
541 (Gebhardt et al.)
Article 5a
Conformity of the digital content or digital service with the contract
In order to conform with the contract, the digital content or digital service must meet the
requirements of Articles 6, 6a, 7 and 8.
CA 41 on Article 6: subjective conformity criteria
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, Greens, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments including: AM 51-55 draft report
(Gebhardt/Voss); AMs 542-549 (Buda), 543-564-566-601 (Maydell), 544-550-553-565-600
(Zullo), 545-547-552-554-560-567 (Rozière), 546 (Dalton, Ford), 548 (Reda), 551 (Guoga),
555 (Grapini), 556 (Juvin), 557 (Cavada), 558 (Le Grip), 599 (Zwiefka, Thun)
Article 6
Subjective requirements for conformity of the digital content with the contract
1. In order to conform with the contract, the digital content or digital service shall, where
relevant:
(a) be of the quantity, quality, description, duration and version and shall possess
functionality, interoperability and other performance features such as
accessibility, continuity and security, as required by the contract including in
any pre-contractual information, which forms integral part of the contract;
(b) be fit for any particular purpose for which the consumer requires it and which
the consumer made known to the supplier trader at the latest at the time of the
conclusion of the contract and which the supplier trader accepted;
(ba) comply with the trial version or preview of the digital content or digital
service, made available by the trader, unless the difference between the
digital content or digital service supplied and the trial version or preview
was brought to the consumer's attention before the contract was concluded;
(c) be supplied along with all the accessories, any instructions, including on
installation, and customer assistance as stipulated by the contract including in
any pre-contractual information, which forms integral part of the contract;
and
131 \ 168
(d) be updated as stipulated by the contract including in any pre-contractual
information, which forms integral part of the contract.
CA 42 on Article 6 a (new): objective conformity criteria
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, Greens, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments including: AM 56-60 draft report
(Gebhardt/Voss); AMs 559 (Dalton, Ford), 561-577-579-581-582-583-585-591-593 (Reda),
562-563-569 (Rozière), 568 (Grapini), 570-587-595-600 (Zullo), 571-586-589-594-601
(Maydell), 572 (Kallas, Charanzova), 573-576 (Guoga), 574 (Le Grip), 575 (Collin-Langen),
578 (Anderson et al.), 580 (Mizzi), 584 (Schwab), 588 (Schaake), 590 (Kallas-Charanzová),
592-598 (Cavada), 596 (Juvin), 597 (Le Grip)
Article 6a
Objective requirements for conformity with the contract
21. To the extent that the contract does not stipulate, where relevant, in a clear and
comprehensive manner, the requirements for the digital content under paragraph 1, the digital
content shall be fit for the purposes for which digital content of the same description would
normally be used including its functionality, interoperability and other performance features
such as accessibility, continuity and security, taking into account:
(a) whether the digital content is supplied in exchange for a price or other counter-
performance than money;
(b) where relevant, any existing international technical standards or, in the absence of
such technical standards, applicable industry codes of conduct and good practices; and
2. To the extent that the contract does not stipulate The digital content or digital service
shall, where relevant in a clear and comprehensive manner, the requirements for the digital
content under paragraph 1, the digital content shall be fit for the purposes for which digital
content of the same description would normally be used including its:
(a) possess qualities and performance features including in relation to
functionality, interoperability, and other performance features such as
accessibility, continuity and security, which are usually found in digital
content or digital services of the same type and which the consumer may
reasonably expect given the nature of the digital content or digital service,
taking into account, (a) whether the digital content is supplied in exchange for
a price or other counter-performance than money; (b) where relevant, any
existing international or European technical standards or, in the absence of
such technical standards, applicable industry codes of conduct and good
practices, including on the security of information systems and digital
environments;
(b) (c) take into account any public statement made by or on behalf of the
supplier trader, the producer or his representative, particularly in
advertising or on labelling or other persons in earlier links of the chain of
transactions, unless the supplier trader shows can show that:
132 \ 168
(i) he was not and could not reasonably have been aware of the respective
statement in question on the specifics of the digital content or digital
service;
(ii) by the time of the conclusion of the contract the statement had been
corrected in the same or a comparable way as it has been made; or
(iii) the decision to acquire the digital content or digital service could not
have been influenced by the statement.
3. Where the contract stipulates that In the case of contracts where the digital content or
digital service is to shall be supplied over a period of time, the digital content or
digital service shall be in conformity with the contract throughout the duration of that
period. Temporary interruptions to the supply of digital content or digital service
which fall on the responsibility of the trader shall be treated as cases of non-
conformity if they are significant, continuous and recurring.
4. Unless otherwise expressly agreed, digital content or a digital service shall be
supplied in conformity with the most recent version of the digital content or digital
service which was available at the time of the conclusion of the contract.
5. The trader shall ensure that during a reasonable period of time the consumer is
supplied with and notified of updates, including security updates, to the digital
content or a digital service that are necessary in order to keep the digital content or
digital service into conformity with the contract. A consumer’s failure to install
those updates within a reasonable period shall have no bearing on the conformity
of the digital content or digital service with the contract. Where the consumer
chooses to remain with his or her present version of the digital content or the digital
service, and the new version is not necessary for the digital content or service to
remain in conformity with the contract, that present version shall remain available
or accessible within a reasonable timeframe.
6. In order to conform with the contract the digital content or digital service must also
meet the requirements of Articles 7 and 8 and, where relevant, Regulation (EU)
2016/679.
CA 43 on Article 2, paragraph 1, point 9: definition of ‘interoperability’
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, Greens, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments including: AM 19 draft report
(Gebhardt/Voss); AMs 426 (Le Grip), 427 (Anderson et al.), 428 (Rozière), 429 (Juvin), 430
(Zullo), 431 (Guoga), 432 (Cavada), 433 (Rozière)
(9) ‘interoperability' means the ability of digital content or a digital service to perform all its
functionalities in interaction with a concrete digital environment including allowing
consumers to access digital content or a digital service without having to use applications
or other technologies to convert the digital content or digital service they want to have
access to.
133 \ 168
CA 44 on recitals 24, 25 and 25a (new): subjective and objective conformity criteria
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, Greens, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including: AM 17 draft report
(Gebhardt/Voss); AMs 233-236 (Rozière), 234-237 (Reda), 238 (Gebhardt et al.), 235-239
(Zullo), 240 (Kallas, Charanzová)
(24) In order to promote innovation in the Digital Single Market and cater for technological
developments reflected in the fast changing characteristics of digital content, it is justified for
the digital content to be, above all, in conformity with what was agreed in the contract.
(25) In cases where order to provide clarity as to what a consumer can expect from the
digital content or digital service concerned and what the trader would be liable for in the
event of failure to supply what is expected, it is essential to harmonise rules for
determining conformity with the contract. Applying a combination of subjective and
objective criteria should safeguard legitimate interests of both parties to the contract. The
contract does not should stipulate sufficiently clear and comprehensive benchmarks to
ascertain the conformity of the digital content or digital service with the contract. It is also
necessary to set objective conformity criteria to ensure that consumers are not deprived of
their rights. In such cases The conformity with the contract should be assessed considering
the purpose quality and performance for which digital content or digital services of the same
description would normally be used, taking into account what can be reasonably expected
by the consumer, the nature of the digital content or digital service and, if applicable, any
public statements on the specific characteristics of the digital content or digital service
made by or on behalf of the trader, the producer or his representative, particularly in
advertising or on labelling. Consumers' expectations vary widely depending on the type
and the use of digital content and services and should therefore be objectively ascertained.
(25a) While freedom of contract with regard to the criteria of conformity with the
contract should be ensured, in order to avoid circumvention of the liability for lack of
conformity and ensure a high level of consumer protection, any contract clause derogating
from the mandatory rules on criteria of conformity and incorrect integration of the digital
content or the digital service, which is detrimental to the interests of the consumer, shall be
valid only if the consumer has been specifically informed and has expressly consented to it
when concluding the contract.
CA 45 on recital 26: interoperability as part of objective conformity criteria
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, Greens, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including: AM 18 draft report
(Gebhardt/Voss); AMs 241 (Reda), 242 (Le Grip), 243 (Buda), 244 (Zullo)
(26) Due to their nature, digital content and digital services need to interact with other
digital equipment to function properly; interoperability should therefore form a part of the
conformity criteria. The notion of interoperability should refer to the ability of the digital
content or digital service to perform all its functionalities in interaction with a concrete
134 \ 168
digital environment. The notion of functionality should refer to the ways in which digital
content or a digital service can be used; it should also refer to the absence or presence of any
technical restrictions such as protection via Digital Rights Management or regional coding.
The consumer should be notified in advance of the authorised uses of the digital content,
such as private copying. Where the contract concerns copyright-protected works, the
conformity of the contract implies that the entirety of copyright laws is respected.
Contractual clauses that specifically prevent the lawful enjoyment of exceptions or
limitations laid down in copyright law should constitute a lack of conformity. The
conditions under which the enjoyment of the exceptions or limitations should continue to
be determined by Union rules on copyright and related rights, which are not modified by
this Directive.
CA 46 on recital 27: security and reliability as part of objective conformity criteria
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, Greens, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including: AM 19 (draft report);
AMs 245 (Schaake), 246 (Dalton/Ford), 9 LIBE
(27) While data-driven services and technologies bring significant benefits, they also
create some vulnerabilities. As recognised by the Digital Single Market Strategy a A high
level of network and information security is essential across the European Union to ensure
respect of fundamental rights such as the right to privacy and protection of personal data, to
increase user confidence and strengthen their trust in the digital economy. As software
becomes pervasive, qualities such as reliability, security, and adaptability to evolving needs
are also becoming a prime concern. It is therefore increasingly important that those data-
driven services and technologies ensure that those qualities are guaranteed, to the extent that
is proportionate to the role and function those technologies play. In particular, quality in
terms of security and reliability is becoming an important concern for innovative, composite
services that have to rely on the interconnection of diverse systems in different domains. In
this context it is important to stress that updates, including security updates, are a
necessary element to secure the operating software of smart goods such as smartphones,
which require the installation as soon as possible by the consumer of the most recent
version provided by the trader in order for the consumer to be protected against
exploitation by persons acting with malicious intent.
CA 47 on recital 28: use of standards
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, Greens, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including: AM 247 + alignment
to CA on Article 6a(1)(a)
(28) When applying the rules of this Directive, suppliers traders should make use of
standards, open technical specifications, good practices and codes of conduct, including in
relation to the commonly used data format for retrieving the content generated by the user or
any other content provided by the consumer, and including on the security of information
systems and digital environments, whether established at the international level, the
135 \ 168
European level or at the level of a specific industry sector. In this context, the Commission
may consider call for the promotion of the development of international and European
standards and the drawing up of a code of conduct by trade associations and other
representative organisations that could support the uniform implementation of the Directive.
CA 48 on recital 28a: updates to the digital content or a digital service
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, EFDD
Compromise amendment creating extra recital corresponding to paragraph 4 of Article 6a
(below)
(28a) During a reasonable period of time, the trader should provide the consumer with
updates, including security updates, in order to keep the digital content or digital service in
conformity with the contract. The consumer should remain free to install those updates or
not. For instance, the consumer may decide not to install the updates supplied to him in
case this would require an upgrade to his operating system. If the consumer decides not to
install the updates, unless expressly agreed otherwise, the consumer cannot reasonably
expect the digital content or digital service to remain in conformity with the contract, and
shall be made aware of the fact that the trader’s responsibility to keep the digital content or
digital service in conformity will have to be assessed in the light of his decision not to
install necessary updates, including on security.
CA 49 on recital 29: conformity of digital content or a digital service supplied over a
period of time
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, Greens, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including: AMs 248
(Kallas/Charanzová), 249 (Zullo), 250 (Voss/Maydell), 251 (Buda), 252 (Marias) +
alignment to CA on Article 6a(2) and (3)
(29) Many types of digital content or digital services are supplied over a period of time.
For instance, such as consumers access to cloud services over a period of time. It is therefore
important necessary to ensure that the digital content or digital service is in conformity with
the contract throughout the duration of the contract. Significant, continuous and recurring
interruptions to the supply of digital content or digital service which fall on the
responsibility of the trader should be treated as cases of non-conformity. Moreover, given
the frequent improvement of digital content and digital services, notably by updates, the
version of digital content or of a digital service supplied to the consumer should be the most
recent one available at the time of the conclusion of the contract, unless the parties to the
contract expressly agree that an older version will be supplied, for instance in order to
ensure interoperability with the digital environment of the consumer.
CA 50 on Article 7: integration of the digital content or digital service
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, Greens, EFDD
136 \ 168
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including: AMs 602-605-606-
609 (Voss/Maydell), 603-608-612 (Zullo), 604-607-610 (Gebhardt et al.), 611 (Reda), 613
(Cavada)
Article 7
Integration of the digital content or digital service
Where the digital content or digital service is incorrectly integrated into the consumer's
digital environment, any lack of conformity resulting from the incorrect integration shall be
regarded as lack of conformity with the contract of the digital content or digital service if:
(a) the digital content or digital service was integrated by the supplier trader or under
the supplier trader’s responsibility; or
(b) the digital content or digital service was intended to be integrated by the
consumer and the incorrect integration was due to shortcomings in the integration
instructions where those instructions were supplied in accordance with point (c) of
Article 6(1) or should have been supplied in accordance with Article 6(2) Article
6a.
CA 51 on recital 30: integration of the digital content or digital service
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, Greens, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including: AM 253 (Guoga) +
alignment to CA on Article 7
(30) In order to work properly, digital content or a digital service needs to be correctly
integrated into the consumer's hardware and software digital environment. Where a lack of
conformity with the contract of the digital content or digital service results from an incorrect
integration, it should be regarded as a lack of conformity with the contract of the digital
content or digital service itself, where it was integrated by the supplier trader or under its
control, or by the consumer following supplier’s the trader’s instructions for integration and
the incorrect integration was due to shortcomings in the required integration instructions. In
such scenarios the origin of the lack of conformity stems from the sphere of the supplier
trader.
CA 52 on Article 8: third party rights
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including: AMs 615 (Niebler),
616-623 (Voss/Maydell), 617-625 (Gebhardt et al.), 618-624 (Juvin), 619-626 (Zullo), 620-
627 (Dzhambazki), 621-628 (Le Grip), 622 (Cavada), 630 (Reda)
Article 8
Third party rights
1. At the time the digital content is supplied to the consumer, the digital content or
digital service shall be free of any restriction resulting from any right of a third
137 \ 168
party, including any right based on intellectual property, so that may prevent the
consumer from using the digital content or digital service can be used in accordance
with the contract.
2. Where the digital content or digital service is supplied over a period of time, the
supplier trader shall, for the duration of that period, keep the digital content or digital
service supplied to the consumer free of any restriction resulting from any right of a
third party, including that any right based on intellectual property, so that may
prevent the consumer from using the digital content or digital service can be used in
accordance with the contract.
CA 53 on recital 31: third party rights
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, Greens, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including: AMs 254 (Cavada),
255 (Voss/Maydell) + alignment to CA on Article 8
(31) Conformity should cover material as well as legal defects. Third party rights might
effectively bar the consumer from enjoying the digital content or digital service or some of
its features in accordance with the contract if those third party rights are infringed, and if
when the third party rightfully compels the supplier trader to stop infringing those rights and
to discontinue offering the digital content or digital services in question. Legal defects are
particularly important for digital content or digital services, which, by its their nature, is are
subject to intellectual property rights. Therefore the supplier trader should be obliged to
ensure that the digital content or digital service is free from any restrictions resulting from
any right of a third party, for example a copyright claim related to the digital content or
digital service, which precludes the consumer from enjoying the digital content or digital
service in accordance with the contract.
CA 54 on Article 8a (new): derogation clauses
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including: AM 55 (Rapporteurs)
Article 8a (new)
Any contract clause excluding, derogating from or varying the effects of Articles 6a, 7 and
8 to the detriment of the consumer shall be valid only if, at the time of conclusion of the
contract, the consumer has been specially informed of the specific condition of the digital
content or digital service and the consumer expressly accepted that specific condition when
concluding the contract.
138 \ 168
10. Compromise amendments on liability, including guarantee period
(Article 10, recitals 34 and 43)
CA 55 on Article 10: liability of the trader
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, Greens, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including AM 661 (Niebler),
AM 662 (Reda), AM 663 (Voss, Maydell), AM 664 (Gebhardt et al.), AM 665 (Guoga), AM
666 (Zullo), AM 667 (Buda), AM 668 (Gebhardt et al.), AM 669 (Voss, Maydell), AM 670
(Kallas, Charanzova), AM 671 (Buda), AM 672 (Zullo), AM 673 (Schwab), AM 674 (Reda),
AM 675 (Mizzi), AM 676 (Kallas, Cavada, Charanzova), AM 677 (Zullo), AM 678 (Buda),
AM 679 (Schwab), AM 680 (Guoga), AM 681 (Reda), AM 682 (Reda), AM 683 (Niebler),
AM 684 (Vaidere), AM 685 (Dzhambazki), AM 686 (Schwab), AM 871 (Zullo), 34 LIBE,
35 LIBE.
Article 10 9
Liability of the supplier trader
1. The supplier trader shall be liable to the consumer for:
(a) any failure to supply the digital content or digital service in accordance with Article
5;
(b) any lack of conformity of the digital content or digital service with the contract:
(i) which exists at the time the digital content is supplied of supply of the digital
content or digital service and becomes apparent within two years from the time of
supply, where the contract provides for a single act of supply or a series of
individual acts of supply; and or
(c) (ii) which becomes apparent during the period of time mentioned in the
contract, where the contract provides that the digital content or digital service shall is
to be supplied over a period of time, any lack of conformity which occurs during the
duration of that period.; and
(c) any lack of conformity with the contract of embedded digital content or an
embedded digital service which exists at the time of delivery of the goods in which
the digital content or digital service is embedded and becomes apparent within two
years from the time of delivery.
2. In respect of point (c) of paragraph 1, Member States may maintain more stringent
provisions in their national law that are already in force at the date of entry into
force of this Directive.
139 \ 168
CA 56 on recital 34
Supported by EPP, S&D, ALDE, ECR, Greens, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including AM 269 (Cavada,
Kallas), AM 270 (Dzhambazki), AM 271 (Voss, Maydell), AM 272 (Gebhardt et al.), AM
273 (Buda), AM 274 (Zullo), AM 275 (Voss, Maydell), AM 276 (Koster), AM 329 (Kallas,
Charanzova, Cavada), AM 330 (Gebhardt et al.), AM 331 (Marias), AM 332 (Vaidere), AM
333 (Zullo), AM 334 (Niebler), AM 335 (Voss, Maydell).
(34) The supplier trader should be liable to the consumer for any failure to supply the
digital content or digital service and for the any lack of conformity of the digital content or
digital service with the contract that becomes apparent within two years from the time of
supply. and for any failure to supply the digital content. Moreover, Given that digital content
or digital services may be supplied over a period of time, it is justified that the supplier
trader should be liable for any lack of conformity which occurs during that period. As
regards embedded digital content or embedded digital services, a similar legal guarantee
regime as for normal goods should apply. In order to increase consumer confidence and
boost cross-border sales, both online and offline, further progress should be made in the
process of harmonisation of consumer legislation. The two-year minimum legal guarantee
period laid down in Directive 1999/44/EC should be turned into a full harmonisation
norm. However, in order not to decrease consumer protection in certain Member States,
those Member States that had already introduced longer or different models of guarantee
periods by the time of entry into force of this Directive should be able to maintain them.
CA 57 on recital 43
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, Greens, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including AM 329 (Kallas,
Charanzova, Cavada), AM 330 (Gebhardt et al.), AM 331 (Marias), AM 332 (Vaidere), AM
333 (Zullo), AM 334 (Niebler), AM 335 (Voss, Maydell).
(43) Due to its nature the digital content is not subject to wear and tear while being used
and it is often supplied over a period of time rather than as a one-off supply. It is, therefore,
justified not to provide a period during which the supplier should be held liable for any lack
of conformity which exists at the time of the supply of the digital content. Consequently
Member States should refrain from maintaining or introducing such a period. Member States
should remain free to rely on national prescription rules in order to ensure legal certainty in
relation to claims based on the lack of conformity of digital content.
140 \ 168
11. Compromise amendments on burden of proof (Article 9; recital 32 and
33)
CA 58 on Article 9
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including AMs 637 (de Jong),
638 (Köster), 639 (Kallas et al.), 641 (Collin-Langen), 642 (Schwab), 643 (Comi et al.), 644
(Voss/Maydell), 645 (Guoga), 646 (Comi et al.), 647 (Comi et al.), 648 (Dzhambazki), 649
(Reda), 639 (Kallas et al.), 650 (Gebhardt et al.), 651 (Voss/Maydell), 652 (Zullo), 653 (Le
Grip), 654 (Comi et al.), 655 (Voss/Maydell), 656 (Gebhardt et al.), 657 (Reda), 658
(Guoga), 659 (Rozière), 661 (Niebler), 676 (Kallas/Cavada/Charanzová), 683 (Niebler), 33
LIBE
Article 9 10
Burden of proof
1. The burden of proof with respect to proving that a lack of conformity existed at the
time specified in Article 10 9 shall be on the supplier trader, when a lack of
conformity with the contract at the time indicated in becomes apparent:
a) within two years of the date of supply of the digital content or digital service,
b) within one year of the date of delivery of the embedded digital content or digital
service,
c) within the duration of the contract, where the contract provides for continuous
supply of digital content or digital service or delivery of embedded digital
content or digital service over a period of time.
2. Paragraph 1 shall not apply where the supplier trader shows that the digital
environment of the consumer is not compatible with interoperability and other
technical requirements of the digital content or digital service and where the supplier
trader informed the consumer of such requirements in a clear and comprehensible
manner before the conclusion of the contract.
3. The consumer shall cooperate with the supplier trader to the extent possible and
necessary to determine ascertain the consumer's digital environment in order to
establish whether the lack of conformity of the digital content or digital service
existed at the time of supply. The obligation to cooperate shall be limited to the
technically available means which are the least intrusive for the consumer. Only in
exceptional and duly justified circumstances where there are no other means
available, the consumer shall grant the trader upon request virtual access to the
consumer's digital environment. Where the consumer fails to cooperate and where
141 \ 168
the trader informed the consumer of such requirement in a clear and
comprehensible manner before the conclusion of the contract, the burden of proof
with respect to the non-conformity lack of conformity with the contract shall be on
the consumer.
CA 58a on Article 9
Alternative CA supported by GUE, Greens
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including AMs 637 (de Jong),
638 (Köster), 639 (Kallas et al.), 641 (Collin-Langen), 642 (Schwab), 643 (Comi et al.), 644
(Voss/Maydell), 645 (Guoga), 646 (Comi et al.), 647 (Comi et al.), 648 (Dzhambazki), 649
(Reda), 639 (Kallas et al.), 650 (Gebhardt et al.), 651 (Voss/Maydell), 652 (Zullo), 653 (Le
Grip), 654 (Comi et al.), 655 (Voss/Maydell), 656 (Gebhardt et al.), 657 (Reda), 658
(Guoga), 659 (Rozière), 661 (Niebler), 676 (Kallas/Cavada/Charanzová), 683 (Niebler), 33
LIBE
Article 9 10
Burden of proof
1. The burden of proof with respect to proving that a lack of conformity existed at the
time specified in Article 10 9 shall be on the supplier trader, when a lack of
conformity with the contract at the time indicated in becomes apparent:
a) within two years of the date of supply of the digital content or digital service,
b) within the duration of the contract, where the contract provides for continuous
supply of digital content or digital service or delivery of embedded digital
content or digital service over a period of time.
2. Paragraph 1 shall not apply where the supplier trader shows that the digital
environment of the consumer is not compatible with interoperability and other
technical requirements of the digital content or digital service and where the supplier
trader informed the consumer of such requirements in a clear and comprehensible
manner before the conclusion of the contract.
3. The consumer shall cooperate with the supplier trader to the extent possible and
necessary to determine ascertain the consumer's digital environment in order to
establish whether the lack of conformity of the digital content or digital service
existed at the time of supply. The obligation to cooperate shall be limited to the
technically available means which are the least intrusive for the consumer. Only in
exceptional and duly justified circumstances where there are no other means
available, the consumer shall grant the trader upon request virtual access to the
consumer's digital environment. Where the consumer fails to cooperate and where
the trader informed the consumer of such requirement in a clear and
comprehensible manner before the conclusion of the contract, the burden of proof
142 \ 168
with respect to the non-conformity lack of conformity with the contract shall be on
the consumer.
CA 59 on recital 32
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including AMs 257
(Voss/Maydell), 258 (Niebler), 259 (Kallas/Charanzova), 260 (Le Grip), 261 (Gebhardt et
al.), 262 (Zullo), 277 (Köster).
(32) Due to the specific nature of digital content and digital services with its their
high complexity as well as the supplier’s trader's better knowledge and access to
know how, technical information and high-tech assistance, it is the supplier trader
who is in a better position than the consumer to know the reasons for the digital
content or digital service not being in conformity with the contract. The supplier
trader is also in a better position to assess whether the lack of conformity with the
contract is due to incompatibility of the consumer’s digital environment with the
technical requirements for the digital content or digital service. Therefore, in case of a
dispute, it should be for the supplier trader to prove that the digital content or digital
service is in conformity with the contract, unless the supplier trader proves that the
consumer's digital environment is not compatible with the digital content or digital
service. Only Where the supplier trader proves that the consumer's digital
environment is not compatible with the interoperability and other technical
requirements, it should be for the consumer to prove that the digital content or service
is not in conformity with the contract. The period of time during which the burden of
proof for the lack of conformity with the contract is on the trader should be two
years from the time when the digital content or digital service was supplied. This
time limit should be reduced to one year in the case of digital content or a digital
service embedded in goods. In the case of long-term contracts for the supply of
digital content or a digital service, the burden of proof should remain on the trader
throughout the duration of the contract.
CA 59a on recital 32
Alternative compromise supported by GUE, Greens
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including AMs 257
(Voss/Maydell), 258 (Niebler), 259 (Kallas/Charanzova), 260 (Le Grip), 261 (Gebhardt et
al.), 262 (Zullo), 277 (Köster).
(32) Due to the specific nature of digital content and digital services with its their
high complexity as well as the supplier’s trader's better knowledge and access to
know how, technical information and high-tech assistance, it is the supplier trader
who is in a better position than the consumer to know the reasons for the digital
content or digital service not being in conformity with the contract. The supplier
trader is also in a better position to assess whether the lack of conformity with the
contract is due to incompatibility of the consumer’s digital environment with the
technical requirements for the digital content or digital service. Therefore, in case of a
dispute, it should be for the supplier trader to prove that the digital content or digital
143 \ 168
service is in conformity with the contract, unless the supplier trader proves that the
consumer's digital environment is not compatible with the digital content or digital
service. Only Where the supplier trader proves that the consumer's digital
environment is not compatible with the interoperability and other technical
requirements, it should be for the consumer to prove that the digital content or service
is not in conformity with the contract. The period of time during which the burden of
proof for the lack of conformity with the contract is on the trader should be two
years from the time when the digital content or digital service was supplied. In the
case of long-term contracts for the supply of digital content or a digital service, the
burden of proof should remain on the trader throughout the duration of the
contract.
CA 60 on recital 33
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, Greens
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including AMs 263 (Schwab),
258 (Niebler), 264 (Reda), 260 (Le Grip), 265 (Voss/Maydell), 266 (Gebhardt et al.), 267
(Guoga), 268 (Zullo)
(33) Without prejudice to the fundamental rights to the protection of private life,
including confidentiality of communications, and the protection of personal data of
the consumer, the consumer should cooperate with the supplier trader in order to
allow the supplier trader to ascertain the consumer's digital environment with the use
of the least intrusive means which are at the disposal of both parties in the
circumstances, with the aim of determining whether the lack of conformity existed at
the time of the supply of the digital content or digital service This may often be done
for instance by providing the supplier trader with automatically generated incident
reports or details of the consumer's internet connection. Only in exceptional and duly
justified circumstances where with the best use of all other means there is no other
way possible, this may also be done by allowing virtual access to the consumer's
digital environment. However, where the consumer does not cooperate with the
supplier trader, it should be for the consumer to prove that the digital content or
digital service is not in conformity with the contract, provided that the consumer was
informed about this consequence.
144 \ 168
12. Compromise amendments on the remedy for failure to supply (Article
11; recital 35)
CA 61 on Article 11
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including AM 687 (Reda), AM
688 (Voss, Maydell), AM 689 (Karas), AM 690 (Voss, Maydell), AM 691 (Guoga), AM 692
(Zullo), AM 693 (Gebhardt), AM 694 (Cavada), AM 695 (Gebhardt et al.), AM 696 (Voss,
Maydell), AM 697 (Gebhardt, Tarabella, Regner), AM 698 (Voss, Maydell).
Article 11
Remedy for the failure to supply
1. Where the supplier trader has failed to supply the digital content or digital service in
accordance with Article 5, the consumer shall call upon the trader to supply the digital
content or digital service. If the trader fails to supply the digital content or digital service
without undue delay, or within an additional period of time as expressly agreed to by the
parties, the consumer shall be entitled to terminate the contract immediately under Article
13.
2. The first paragraph shall not apply:
(a) where the trader has refused to supply the digital content or digital services; or
(b) where supply within the agreed period is essential taking into account all the
circumstances attending the conclusion of the contract or where the consumer informs the
trader, prior to the conclusion of the contract, that supply by or on a specified date is
essential.
In those cases, if the trader fails to supply at the relevant time pursuant Article 5(2), the
consumer shall be entitled to terminate the contract immediately.
3. Where the consumer terminates the contract, Articles 13, 13a, 13b and 13c shall apply.
CA 62 on recital 35
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including AM 278 (Reda), AM
279 (Voss, Maydell), AM 280 (Gebhardt et al.), AM 281 (Buda), AM 282 (Zullo).
(35) A failure of Where the supplier trader fails to supply the digital content or digital
services to the consumer in accordance with the contract is a serious breach of the main
contractual obligation of the supplier, which the consumer should call upon the trader to
145 \ 168
make the supply. Any failure to supply the digital content or digital service without undue
delay should allow the consumer to immediately terminate the contract, unless the parties
expressly agree to an additional period of time for the supply of the digital content or
digital service. Where the supplier trader has initially not failed to supply the digital content
or digital services, interruptions of the supply making the digital content or digital services
not available or accessible to the consumer over a short period of time should be treated as
non-conformity with the contract, and not a failure to supply. In particular, the requirement of
proper continuity of the digital content or digital services should also cover more than
negligible short term interruptions of the supply.
146 \ 168
13. Compromise amendments on remedies for the lack of conformity
(Article 12, Article 2(11a) and recitals 36 and 37; Article 3(9) and recital
10)
CA 63 on Article 12
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including AM 700 (Gebhardt et
al.), AM 701 (Reda), AM 702 (Zullo), AM 703 (Reda), AM 704 (Mizzi), AM 705 (Voss,
Maydell), AM 706 (Gebhardt et al.), AM 707 (Zullo), AM 708 (Voss, Maydell), AM 709
(Gebhardt et al.), AM 710 (Reda), AM 711 (Zullo), AM 712 (Niebler), AM 713 (Reda), AM
714 (Gebhardt et al.), AM 715 (Schwab), AM 716 (Zullo), AM 717 (Voss, Maydell), AM
718 (Kallas, Charanzova), AM 719 (Reda), AM 720 (Voss, Maydell), AM 721 (Schwab),
AM 722 (Gebhardt et al.), AM 723 (Zullo), AM 724 (Karas), AM 725 (Reda), AM 726
(Voss, Maydell), AM 727 (Gebhardt et al.), AM 728 (Rozière), AM 729 (Zullo), AM 730
(Voss, Maydell), AM 731 (Schwab), AM 732 (Gebhardt et al.), AM 733 (Zullo), AM 734
(Reda), AM 735 (Voss, Maydell), AM 736 (Schwab), AM 737 (Gebhardt et al.), AM 738
(Reda), AM 739 (Voss, Maydell), AM 740 (Gebhardt et al.), AM 741 (Reda), AM 742 (Voss,
Maydell), AM 743 (Reda), AM 744 (Gebhardt et al.), AM 745 (Voss, Maydell), AM 746
(Gebhardt et al.), AM 747 (Voss, Maydell), AM 748 (Reda), AM 749 (Zullo), AM 750
(Gebhardt et al.), AM 751 (Comi et al.), AM 752 (Schwab), AM 753 (Reda), AM 754 (Voss,
Maydell), AM 755 (Gebhardt et al.), AM 756 (Reda), AM 757 (Rozière), AM 758 (Voss,
Maydell), AM 759 (Kallas, Charanzova), AM 760 (Collin-Langen), AM 761 (Le Grip), AM
762 (Zullo), AM 766 (Voss, Maydell), AM 767 (Zullo), AM 769 (Gebhardt et al.), 36 LIBE,
37 LIBE.
Article 12
Remedies for the lack of conformity with the contract
-1. In the case of a lack of conformity with the contract, the consumer shall be
entitled to have the digital content or digital service brought into conformity, or to
receive a proportionate reduction in the price, or to terminate the contract under
the conditions set out in this Article.
1. In the case of a lack of conformity with the contract, tIn the , first place case of a
lack of conformity with the contract, the consumer shall be entitled to have the
digital content or digital service brought into conformity with the contract free of
charge, unless this is impossible, disproportionate or unlawful.
Bringing the digital content or digital service into conformity with the contract shall
be deemed to be disproportionate in particular where the costs it imposes imposed
on the supplier trader are unreasonable. The following shall be taken into account
when deciding whether the costs are unreasonable:
147 \ 168
(a) the value the digital content or digital service would have if it were in
conformity with the contract; and
(b) the significance of the lack of conformity with the contract for attaining the
purpose for which the digital content or a digital service of the same
description would normally be used.
2. The supplier trader shall bring the digital content or digital service in conformity
with the contract pursuant to paragraph 1 within a reasonable time from the time the
supplier trader has been informed by the consumer about the lack of conformity
with the contract, free of charge and without any significant inconvenience to the
consumer, taking account of the nature of the digital content or the digital service
and the purpose for which the consumer required this digital content or digital
service.
The consumer shall be entitled to withhold the payment of any outstanding part of
the price, or where the lack of conformity is minor, of an appropriate proportion
thereof, until the trader has brought the digital content or digital service into
conformity with the contract.
3. The consumer shall be entitled to either a proportionate reduction of the price in the
manner set out in paragraph 4 where the digital content or the digital service is
supplied in exchange for a payment of a price, or may terminate the contract under
paragraph 5 and Articles 13, 13a, 13b and 13c where
(a) the remedy to bring the digital content or digital service in conformity is
impossible, disproportionate or unlawful, in accordance with paragraph 1;
(b) the supplier trader has not completed the remedy within the time specified
brought the digital content or digital service in conformity in accordance
with paragraph 2;
(ba) a lack of conformity appears despite the trader’s attempt to bring the digital
content or digital service in conformity; or
(c) the remedy to bring the digital content in conformity would cause significant
inconvenience to the consumer; or
(d) the supplier trader has declared, or it is equally clear from the circumstances,
that the supplier trader will not bring the digital content or digital service in
conformity with the contract within a reasonable time or without significant
inconvenience for the consumer.
4. The consumer shall exercise the right to a proportionate reduction of the price by
means of an unequivocal statement setting out his decision, notified to the trader. The reduction in price shall be proportionate to the decrease in the value of the
digital content or digital service which was received by the consumer compared to
the value of that the digital content or digital service would have if it was that is in
conformity with the contract.
148 \ 168
Where the contract stipulates that the digital content or digital service is to be
supplied over a period of time in exchange of the payment of a price, and for a
certain period the digital content or digital service did not conform to the contract,
the price reduction shall apply to the period during which the digital content or
digital service has not been in conformity with the contract.
5. The consumer may terminate the contract only if the lack of conformity with the
contract is not minor impairs functionality, interoperability and other main
performance features of the digital content or digital service such as its accessibility,
continuity and security where required by Article 6 paragraphs (1) and (2). The
burden of proof that the lack of conformity with the contract does not impair
functionality, interoperability and other main performance features of the digital
content or digital service shall be on the supplier trader.
5a. The consumer shall not be entitled to a remedy to the extent that the consumer has
contributed to the lack of conformity with the contract or its effects.
CA 64 on Article 2, point 11a (new), definition of ‘minor lack of conformity’
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, Greens, EFDD
11a. ‘minor lack of conformity’ means a lack of conformity that is not impairing the
functionality, interoperability and other main performance features of the digital
content or digital service such as its accessibility, continuity and security where
required by paragraphs 1 and 2 of Article 6.
CA 65 on recital 36
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including AM 283 (Gebhardt et
al.), AM 284 (Rozière), AM 285 (Reda), AM 286 (Voss, Maydell), AM 287 (Buda), AM 288
(Zullo), AM 289 (Voss, Maydell), AM 290 (Gebhardt et al.)
(36) In the case of non-conformity with the contract, consumers should as a first step be
entitled to have the digital content or digital service brought to into conformity with the
contract. Depending on technical characteristics of the digital content or digital service, the
supplier trader may select a specific way of bringing the digital content or digital service to
conformity with the contract, for example by issuing updates or requiring the consumer to
access a new copy of the digital content. To avoid any significant inconvenience for the
consumer, the trader should not be entitled to make more than one attempt to rectify the
same defect. Given the diversity of digital content and digital services, it is not appropriate to
set fixed deadlines for the exercise of rights or the fulfilling of obligations related to that
digital content or digital service. Such deadlines may not capture this diversity and be either
too short or too long, depending on the case. It is therefore more appropriate to refer to
reasonable deadlines. The reasonable time for bringing the digital content or digital service
in conformity with the contract should be objectively ascertained, having regard to the
149 \ 168
nature of the digital content or service and the lack of conformity. The digital content or
digital service should be brought into conformity with the contract within a reasonable time
and free of any costs; in particular the consumer should not incur any costs associated with
the development of an update for the digital content.
CA 66 on recital 37
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including AM 291 (Rozière),
AM 292 (Collin-Langen), AM 293 (Voss, Maydell), AM 294 (Gebhardt et al.), AM 295
(Cavada), AM 296 (Dzhambazki), AM 297 (Kallas, Charanzova), AM 298 (Zullo), AM 299
(Reda), AM 300 (Le Grip), LIBE 10
(37) As a second step, the consumer should be entitled to have the price reduced or the
contract terminated. The right of a consumer to have the contract terminated should be
limited to those cases where for instance bringing the digital content or digital service into to
conformity is not possible and the non-conformity impairs the main performance features of
the digital content or digital service. In the case of contracts concluded by digital means,
the trader should provide the consumer with an easy digital means to terminate the
contract, for instance, an online form. Where the consumer terminates the contract, the
supplier trader should reimburse the price paid by the consumer or, where the digital content
is supplied not in exchange for a price but against access to data provided by the consumer,
the supplier should refrain from using it, from transferring that data to third parties or
allowing third parties to access it after termination of the contract. Fulfilling the obligation to
refrain from using data should mean in the case when the counter-performance consists of
personal data, that the supplier should take all measures in order to comply with data
protection rules by deleting it or rendering it anonymous in such a way that the consumer
cannot be identified by any means likely reasonably to be used either by the supplier or by
any other person. Without prejudice to obligations of a controller under Directive 95/46/EC
the supplier should not be obliged to undertake any further steps in relation to data which the
supplier has lawfully provided to third parties in the course of the duration of the contract for
the supply of the digital content.
Hidden defects and short-term right to reject
CA 67 on Article 3(9)
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, GUE, Greens, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including AM 42 (draft report),
AM 507 (Buda), AM 508 (Maydell), AM 782 (Anderson et al.)
9. In so far as not regulated in this Directive, tThis Directive shall not affect national
general contract laws such as rules on the formation, the validity or effects of
contracts, including the consequences of the termination of a contract, in so far as
they are not regulated in this Directive. This Directive shall not affect national rules
150 \ 168
on remedies for ‘hidden defects’ or the short-term right to reject. Member States
may maintain or introduce national rules on remedies for ‘hidden defects’. Member
States may maintain national rules on the short-term right to reject, where available
in Member States’ legal orders on the date of entry into force of this Directive.
CA 68 on recital 10
Supported by EPP, S&D, GUE, Greens, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including AM 150 (Anderson et
al.), AM 151 (Marias), AM 152 (Voss/Maydell)
(10) This Directive should not affect national laws to the extent that the topics concerned
are not regulated by this Directive, such as national rules providing for obligations of
the consumer towards the supplier of digital content or regulating the qualification,
formation and validity of contracts or the legality of the content. Member States
should also remain free to provide rules for the detailed conditions for the exercise of
rights, such as the right to damages to the extent not covered by the Directive, or rules
which provide for the consequences of termination of the contract which apply in
addition to restitution rules regulated by this Directive. Member States should be
allowed to maintain or introduce national rules on remedies for ‘hidden defects’.
Member States should be allowed to maintain national rules on the short-term right
to reject where available in Member States’ legal orders on the date of entry into
force of this Directive.
151 \ 168
14. Compromise amendments on termination (Articles 13, 13a, 13b and
13c)
CA 69 on Articles 13, 13a, 13b and 13c, termination
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, Greens, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including: AMs 770, 772, 786,
789, 801, 813, 815, 824, 830, 836, 839, 841, 845, 851 (Gebhardt et al.), 771, 781, 796, 808,
827, 833, 838, 843 (Zullo), 773 (Buda), 774, 826 (Kallas/Charanzová), 775, 791, 807, 814,
816, 817 (Dalton/Ford), 776, 795, 806 (Dzhambazki), 777, 809 (Charanzová), 778, 787, 792,
800, 828, 842 (Guoga), 779, 784, 825, 832, 834, 840, 846, 850 (Voss/Maydell), 780, 788
(Niebler), 783 (Dalton/Ford/Van Bossuyt), 790, 804, 812, 819, 821, 823, 829, 835 (Reda),
793, 803 (Kallas, Cavada, Charanzová), 794, 811 (Collin-Langen), 797, 805 (Rozière), 798
(Mizzi), 799, 820 (Schwab), 802 (Cavada), 810 (Le Grip), 818 (De Jong), 831, 837
(Comi/Gardini/Maullu), 844 (Karas), 38 LIBE, 39 LIBE.
Article 13
Exercise of the right of termination
1. The consumer shall exercise the right to terminate the contract by notice means of
an unequivocal statement setting out his decision to terminate the contract,
notified to the supplier trader given. In case, or in any event of contracts concluded
by digital means, the trader shall provide the consumer with an easy digital means
to terminate the contract. The termination shall become effective 14 days after the
notification, or a later date indicated by the consumer.
Article 13a
Obligations of the trader in the event of termination
2.1. Where the consumer terminates In the event of termination of the contract:
(a) the supplier trader shall reimburse to the consumer the price all sums paid under
the contract. without undue delay and in any event not later than 14 days from
receipt of the notice;.
In case the contract provides for the supply of digital content or a digital service in
exchange for a payment of a price and over a period of time, where the consumer
terminates a part of such contract in accordance with [paragraph 5 of Article 12],
the trader shall reimburse to the consumer the part of the price corresponding to
the period of time during which the digital content or digital service was not in
conformity with the contract and any part of the price paid by the consumer in
advance for any remaining period of the contract had it not been terminated.
152 \ 168
1a. In respect of personal data of the consumer, the trader shall comply with the
obligations applicable under Regulation (EU) 2016/679.
2. (b) The trader shall take all measures which could be expected in order to refrain
from the use of any user-generated content to the extent that it does not constitute
personal data, the counter-performance other than money which was provided or
created by the consumer has provided in exchange for when using the digital
content or digital service supplied by the trader, and any other data collected by the
supplier in relation to the supply of the digital content including any content
provided by the consumer with the exception of:
(a) the content that cannot be refrained from using without disproportionate
and unreasonable effort because it has no utility outside the context of the
digital content or digital service supplied by the trader,
(b) the content that cannot be refrained from using without disproportionate
and unreasonable effort because it only relates to the consumer’s activity
when using the digital content or digital service supplied by the trader,
(c) the content which has been generated jointly by the consumer and others,
when other consumers can who continue to make use of the content;
(d) the content that has been aggregated with other data by the trader and
cannot be disaggregated or only with disproportionate efforts.
3. (c) The supplier trader shall, upon request by the consumer, provide shall make
available to the consumer with technical means to retrieve all any user-generated
content to the extent that it does not constitute personal data, which was provided
or created by the consumer and any other data produced or generated through the
consumer's use of when using the digital content or digital service supplied by the
trader to the extent that data has been retained by the supplier. The consumer shall
be entitled to retrieve the content free of charge, without significant inconvenience,
in reasonable time and in a commonly used and machine-readable data format;.
The obligation to make available such user-generated content shall not apply in
case the user-generated content:
(a) cannot be made available without disproportionate and unreasonable effort
because it has no utility outside the context of the digital content or digital
service supplied by the trader,
(b) cannot be made available without disproportionate and unreasonable effort
because it only relates to the consumer’s activity when using the digital
content or digital service supplied by the trader, or
(c) has been aggregated with other data by the trader and cannot be
disaggregated or only with disproportionate efforts
(d) where the digital content was not supplied on a durable medium, the consumer
shall refrain from using the digital content or making it available to third parties,
in particular by deleting the digital content or rendering it otherwise
unintelligible;
153 \ 168
(e) where the digital content was supplied on a durable medium, the consumer shall:
(i) upon the request of the supplier, return, at the supplier's expense, the
durable medium to the supplier without undue delay, and in any event
not later than 14 days from the receipt of the supplier's request; and
(ii) delete any usable copy of the digital content, render it unintelligible or
otherwise refrain from using it or making it available to third parties.
3.4. Upon termination, the supplier trader may prevent any further use of the digital
content or digital service by the consumer, in particular by making rendering the
digital content or digital service not inaccessible to the consumer or disabling the
user account of the consumer, without prejudice to point (c) of paragraph 23.
Article 13b
Obligations of the consumer in the event of termination
1. After termination of the contract, the consumer shall refrain from using the digital
content or digital service and from making it available to third parties, for instance
by deleting the digital content or any usable copy or rendering the digital content or
digital service otherwise inaccessible.
2. In case of embedded digital content or an embedded digital service, the consumer
shall, upon the request of the trader, return, at the trader’s expense, the good in
which the digital content or digital service is embedded to the trader without undue
delay, and in any event not later than 14 days from the receipt of the trader’s
request. If the trader decides to request the return of the good in which the digital
content or digital service is embedded, that request shall be made within 14 days
from the day on which the trader is informed of the consumer’s decision to
terminate the contract.
4.3 The consumer shall not be liable to pay for any use made of the digital content or
digital service in the period prior to the termination of the contract during which the
digital content or the digital service was not in conformity.
5. Where the digital content has been supplied in exchange for a payment of a price
and over the period of time stipulated in the contract, the consumer may terminate
the contract only in relation to that part of the period of time where the digital
content has not been in conformity with the contract.
6. Where the consumer terminates a part of the contract in accordance with paragraph
5, paragraph 2 shall apply, with the exception of point (b) in regards to the period
during which the digital content was in conformity with the contract. The supplier
shall reimburse to the consumer the part of the price paid corresponding to the
period of time when the digital content was not in conformity with the contract.
154 \ 168
Article 13c
Time limits and means of reimbursement by the trader
1. Any reimbursement to be done by the trader to the consumer pursuant to [Article
12(4) or 13a(1)] due to price reduction or termination of the contract shall be done
without undue delay and in any event within 14 days from the day on which the
trader is informed by means referred to in Articles 12 and 13 of the consumer’s
decision to invoke his right for a price reduction or his right to terminate the
contract.
2. The trader shall carry out the reimbursement using the same means of payment as
the consumer used to pay for the digital content or digital service, unless the
consumer expressly agrees otherwise.
3. The trader shall not impose any fee on the consumer in respect of the
reimbursement.
CA 70 on recital 15
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, Greens, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including: AM 198 (Kallas,
Charanzova), AM 199 (Reda), AM 200 (Marias), AM 201 (Guoga)
(15) Content generated by consumers should be treated on the same basis as any other
digital content or digital services that the consumer provides or stores throughout the
period of duration of the contract such as music and video files, pictures, games or
applications, unless specifically provided for in this Directive. Content generated by
consumers comprises a wide range of examples including digital images, video and
audio files, blogs, discussion forums, text-based collaboration formats, posts, chats,
tweets, logs, podcasting, content created on mobile devices, content created in the
context of online virtual environments, ratings and collections of links referring to
online content.
CA 71 on recital 38
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, Greens, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including: AMs 304 (Reda), 305
(Dalton, Ford), 306 (Kallas, Charanzová), 307 (Gebhardt et al.), 308 (Cavada), 11 LIBE.
(38) Upon termination the suppliertrader should refrain from using the content generated
by the consumer. However, in those cases where more than one consumer generated
particular content and other consumers can continue to make use of it, or the user-
generated content either has no utility outside the eco-system or only relates to the
consumer’s activity, or has been aggregated with other data by the trader and cannot be
disaggregated or only with disproportionate efforts, the supplier trader is entitled to
155 \ 168
continue to use the content generated by the consumer. This includes individual content
contributions by a consumer to a collaborative project that other consumers continue to
make use of, which should be reusable by the trader under the conditions under which they
were originally provided by the consumer also after the contract is terminated.
CA 72 on recital 39
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, Greens, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including: AMs 311 (Kallas,
Charanzová), 312 (Dalton, Ford), 313 (Cavada), 314 (Buda), 315 (Dzhambazki), 316 (Zullo),
317 (Rozière), 12 LIBE.
(39) In order to ensure that the consumer benefits from effective protection in relation to
the right to terminate the contract, the suppliertrader should allow the consumer to retrieve
all data uploaded by the consumer, produced by the consumer with the use of the digital
content or the digital service or generated through the consumer's use of the digital content or
the digital service. This obligation should extend to data which the suppliertrader is obliged
to retain under the contract for the supply of the digital content or the digital service as well
as to data which the supplier has effectively retained in relation to the contract.
CA 73 on recital 40
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, Greens, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including: AMs 318 (Voss,
Maydell), 319 (Kallas, Charanzová), 320 (Dzhambazki)
(40) Where, fFollowing the termination of the contract because of a lack of conformity
with the contract, the supplier trader should make available to provides the consumer any
user-generated content not constituteing personal data, unless such content has no utility
outside the context of the digital content or digital service supplied by the trader, only
relates to the consumer’s activity when using the digital content or digital service supplied
by the trader, or has been aggregated with other data by the trader and cannot be
disaggregated or only with disproportionate efforts. with the technical means to retrieve the
data, tThe consumer should be entitled to retrieve the content data free of any costs, and for
example the cost of employing in a commonly used and machine-readable data format. with
the exception of costs generated by the consumer's own digital environment including the
costs of a network connection as they are not specifically linked with the retrieval of the data.
CA 74 on recital 41
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, Greens,
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including: AMs 321 (Niebler),
322 (Buda), 323 (Voss, Maydell), 324 (Zullo)
156 \ 168
(41) Where the contract is terminated, the consumer should not be required to pay for the
use of digital content or a digital service which that is not in conformity with the contract
because that would deprive the consumer of effective protection.
CA 75 on recital 42
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, Greens,
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including: AMs 325 (Buda),
326 (Gebhardt et al.), 327 (Zullo), 328 (Voss, Maydell)
(42) Considering the need to balance legitimate interests of consumers and suppliers
traders, where the digital content or the digital service provided over a period of time in
exchange for a payment of a price, gives rise to the right to terminate, the consumer should be
entitled to terminate only the part of the contract which corresponds to the period of time
when the digital content or the digital service was not in conformity with the contract.
However where the digital content is provided against a counter-performance other than
money partial termination is not feasible because it is impossible to proportionally apportion
a counter-performance other than money.
157 \ 168
15. Political agreement not to include the commercial guarantee on lifespan
in the Digital Content proposal
Political agreement not include the commercial guarantee on lifespan in the Digital Content
proposal, without prejudice to the political negotiations within the framework of the Sales of
Goods proposal:
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, Greens, EFDD
This entails that AM 635 will not be supported
158 \ 168
16. Compromise amendements on damages (Article 14 and recital 44)
CA 76 on Article 14
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, Greens, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including AM 855 (Voss,
Maydell), AM 856 (Collin-Langen), AM 857 (Gebhardt et al.), AM 858 (Buda), AM 859
(Schwab), AM 860 (Zullo), AM 861 (Guoga), AM 862 (Dalton, Ford), AM 863 (Cavada),
AM 864 (Rozière), AM 865 (Reda), AM 866 (Reda), AM 867 (Rozière), AM 868 (Le Grip),
AM 869 (Rozière), AM 870 (Gebhardt et al.), 40 LIBE, 41 LIBE.
Article 14
Right to damages
1. The supplier shall be liable to the consumer for any economic damage to the digital
environment of the consumer caused by a lack of conformity with the contract or a failure to
supply the digital content. Damages shall put the consumer as nearly as possible into the
position in which the consumer would have been if the digital content had been duly supplied
and been in conformity with the contract. Member States shall ensure that the consumer is
entitled to claim compensation for the damages caused by a failure to supply the digital
content or digital service or a lack of conformity of the digital content or digital service
with the contract.
2. The Member States shall lay down detailed rules for the exercise of the right to
damages.
CA 77 on recital 44
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, Greens, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including AM 336 (Voss,
Maydell), AM 337 (Reda), AM 338 (Buda), AM 339 (Gebhardt et al.), AM 340 (Guoga),
AM 341 (Zullo), AM 342 (Guoga), 13 LIBE.
(44) The principle of the supplier trader's liability for damages is an essential element of
the contracts for supply of digital content or digital service. In order to increase consumers'
trust in digital content this principle should thus be regulated at Union level to ensure that
consumers do not suffer a detriment if their hardware or software is damaged by digital
content which is not in conformity with the contract. Therefore, the consumer should be
entitled to claim for a compensation for damages caused to the consumer’s digital
environment by a lack of conformity with the contract or a failure to supply the digital
content. However, if the existence of such a right to claim damages should be ensured in
all Members States, it should not be regulated at Union level and should be determined by
national law. it should be for Member States to lay down the detailed conditions for the
exercise of the right to damages while taking into account that discounts on prices for future
159 \ 168
supplies of the digital content, especially when offered by suppliers as an exclusive
compensation for losses, do not necessarily put the consumer as nearly as possible into the
position in which the consumer would have been if the digital content had been duly supplied
and been in conformity with the contract.
17. Compromise amendment on modification of digital content (Article 15
and recitals 45 and 45a (new))
CA 78 on Article 15
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, Greens, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including: AMs 61, 62, 63, 64,
65, 66, 67, 68 draft report (Gebhardt/Voss); AMs 873, 877, 898, 902 (Zullo), 874, 875, 881,
883, 887, 891, 896, 897 (Maydell), 876, 894, 903 (Reda), 878, 888, 905 (Kallas/Charanzová),
879 (Le Grip), 880, 882, 885, 889, 895 (Rozière), 884, 890, 899 (Guoga), 886, 901
(Dalton/Ford), 892 (Schwab), 893 (Dzhambazki), 900 (Maydell/Thun), 904 (Collin-Langen),
906 (Gebhardt et al.), 42 LIBE, 43 LIBE, 44 LIBE, 45 LIBE.
Article 15
Modification of the digital content or digital service
1. Where the contract provides that the digital content or the digital service shall is to
be supplied or made accessible over the a period of time stipulated in the contract,
the supplier trader may only alter the functionality, interoperability and other main
performance features of the digital content or digital service beyond what is
necessary to maintain in conformity the digital content or digital service in
accordance with Article 6a such as its accessibility, continuity and security, to the
extent those alternations adversely affect access to or use of the digital content by
the consumer, only if:
(a) the contract so stipulates allows for and gives a valid reason for such a
modification;
(aa) such a modification can reasonably be expected by the consumer;
(ab) the modification is provided without additional cost for the consumer; and
(b) the trader notifies the consumer is notified reasonably in advance of the
modification, in a clear and comprehensible manner and on a durable
medium of the modification and, where applicable, of his right to terminate
the contract under the conditions provided in paragraph 1a by an explicit
notice on a durable medium;
(c) the consumer is allowed to terminate the contract free of any charges within no
less than 30 days from the receipt of the notice; and
160 \ 168
(d) upon termination of the contract in accordance with point (c), the consumer is
provided with technical means to retrieve all content provided in accordance
with Article 13(2)(c).
1a. The consumer shall be entitled to terminate the contract if the modification
negatively impacts the access to or the use of the digital content or digital service by
the consumer, unless such negative impact is only minor. In this case, the
consumer shall be entitled to terminate the contract free of charge within 30 days
from the receipt of the notice or from the time when the digital content or digital
service is altered by the trader, whichever is later.
2. Where the consumer terminates the contract in accordance with paragraph 1a, where
relevant, Articles 13, 13a and 13b shall apply accordingly.
(a) the supplier shall reimburse to the consumer the part of the price paid
corresponding to the period of time after modification of the digital content;
(b) the supplier shall refrain from the use of the counter-performance other than
money which the consumer has provided in exchange for the digital content
and any other data collected by the supplier in relation to the supply of the
digital content including any content provided by the consumer.
CA 79 on recitals 45 and 45a (new)
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, Greens, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including: AMs 343
(Kallas/Charanzová), 344 (Gebhardt et al.), 345 (Voss/Maydell), 346 (Zullo), 347
(Dzhambazki), 348 (Le Grip)
(45) Due to technological or other reasons the The supplier trader might should be
compelled allowed under certain conditions to change modify main performance
features of the digital content or digital service supplied over a period of time, such
as its accessibility and continuity provided the contract gives a valid reason for such
a modification. Such valid reasons could encompass cases where the modification
is necessary to adapt the digital content or digital service to a new technical
environment or to an increased number of users or for other important operational
reasons. These changes are often to the advantage of the consumer as they improve
the digital content or digital service. Consequently, the parties to the contract may
include respective clauses in the contract which allow the supplier trader to undertake
modifications. However, where such modifications negatively affect the way the
consumer benefits from main performance features of the digital content or digital
service, they may disturb the balance of the contract or the nature of the performance
due under the contract to an extent that the consumer may not have concluded such a
contract. Therefore, in such cases these modifications should be subject to certain
conditions. In order to balance consumer and business interests, such a possibility
offered to the trader should be coupled with a right of the consumer to terminate
161 \ 168
the contract where these modifications negatively impact the use of or access to the
digital content or digital service in a more than only minor manner. To what extent
modifications negatively impact the use of or access to the digital content or digital
service by the consumer should be objectively ascertained having regard to the
nature and purpose of the digital content or digital service and to the quality,
functionality, interoperability and other main features which are normal in digital
content or a digital service of the same type. The rules concerning such updates,
upgrades or similar modifications should however not concern situations where, for
instance as a consequence of distributing a new version of the digital content or
digital service, the parties conclude a new contract for the supply of the digital
content or digital service.
(45a) Where such a modification negatively impacts the access or use of the digital
content or digital service by the consumer, the consumer should enjoy as a result of
such a modification the right to terminate the contract free of any cost. Where the
conditions under which the modification is allowed are not satisfied, the
consumer’s rights to remedies for the lack of conformity remain unprejudiced.
Similarly, where, subsequently to a modification a lack of conformity of the digital
content or digital service occurs that has not been caused by the modification, the
consumer should continue to be entitled to rely on remedies for the lack of
conformity in relation to this digital content or digital service as provided for in this
Directive.
162 \ 168
18. Compromise amendments on long-term contracts (Article 16 and
recital 46)
CA 80 on Article 16
Supported by EPP, S&D, ALDE, GUE, Greens, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including: AMs 907
(Voss/Maydell), 908-909-919-926-932-958 (Schwab), 910 (Cavada), 911-922-937-946
(Dzhambazki), 912 (Jaakonsaari), 913 (Juvin), 914-936-947 (Dalton/Ford), 915-929-938-
949-954-960 (Zullo), 916-930-950 (Rozière), 917-935-944-953-955-957 (Reda), 918-923-
928-933-940-943-961 (Gebhardt et al.), 920-941-945-959 (Kallas/Charanzová), 921-948
(Charanzová), 924 (Niebler), 925-931-934-942-952-956-962 (Guoga), 927 (Le Grip), 939-
951 (Collin-Langen), 46 LIBE, 47 LIBE
Article 16
Right to terminate long term contracts
1. Where the contract provides for the supply of the digital content or digital service
for an indeterminate period or where the initial fixed contract duration exceeding 12
months or where any combination of subsequent contracts or renewal periods
exceed exceeds 12 months from the moment of conclusion of the initial contract,
the consumer shall be entitled to terminate the contract free of any additional
charges any time after the expiration of the first 12 months period.
1a. Where the consumer terminates a fixed term contract and the contract duration or
any combination of renewal periods exceed 12 months, the trader shall be entitled
to proportionate compensation for those advantages he has given to the consumer
because of the contract duration exceeding 12 months.
Before the consumer is bound by a contract, or any corresponding offer, the trader
shall provide the consumer with information on the conditions for terminating a
contract with a duration of more than 12 months in a clear and comprehensible
manner, if that information is not already apparent from the context, and on the
consequences of early termination in case an advantage had been granted to the
consumer because of the duration of the contract.
2. The consumer shall exercise the right to terminate the contract by notice to the
supplier trader given by any means of an unequivocal statement setting out his
decision to terminate the contract. The termination shall become effective 14 days
after the receipt of the notice, or a later date indicated by the consumer.
3. Where the digital content or digital service is supplied in exchange for a payment of
a price, the consumer remains liable to pay the part of the price for the digital
content or digital service supplied corresponding to the period of time before the
termination becomes effective.
163 \ 168
4. When the consumer terminates the contract in accordance with this Article : the
trader shall in respect of personal data comply with the obligations applicable
under Regulation 2016/679 and Directive 2002/58/EC.
(a) the supplier shall take all measures which could be expected in order to refrain from
the use of other counter-performance than money which the consumer has provided in
exchange for the digital content and any other data collected by the supplier in relation to the
supply of the digital content including any content provided by the consumer;
(b) the supplier shall provide the consumer with technical means to retrieve all any
content provided by the consumer and any other data produced or generated through the
consumer's use of the digital content to the extent this data has been retained by the supplier.
The consumer shall be entitled to retrieve the content without significant inconvenience, in
reasonable time and in a commonly used data format; and
4a. Where applicable, the consumer shall delete any usable copy of the digital content or
digital service, render it unintelligible or otherwise refrain from using it including by
making it available to a third party.
5. Upon termination, the supplier trader may prevent any further use of the digital
content or digital service by the consumer, in particular by making the digital
content or digital service not accessible to the consumer or disabling the user
account of the consumer.
CA 81 on recital 46
Supported by EPP, S&D, ALDE, GUE, Greens, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including: AM 349
(Voss/Maydell), 350 (Dzhambazki), 351 (Marias), 352 (Zullo), 353 (Reda),
(46) Competition is an important element for a well-functioning digital single market. In
order to stimulate such a competition, consumers should be enabled to respond to competitive
offers and to switch between suppliers traders. In order to make this work in practice, they
should be able to do so without being hindered by legal, technical or practical obstacles,
including contractual conditions or lack of means for retrieving all data uploaded by the
consumer, produced by the consumer with the use of the digital content or generated through
the consumer's use of the digital content. However, it is also important to protect existing
investments and the trust in concluded contracts. Therefore consumers should be given the
right to terminate long-term contracts under certain balanced conditions. This does not
preclude that consumer contracts may be concluded for longer contractual periods. Any
advantages resulting from the conclusion of contracts exceeding 12 months should be
reimbursed proportionately in case of an earlier termination. The trader should provide
information about the conditions and consequences for early termination of fixed-term
contracts exceeding 12 months. However, the consumer should be entitled to terminate any
contractual relation that altogether lasts for a period longer than exceeding 12 months. In
order to prevent any circumvention of this right it should cover any contract which results in
the consumer being bound by the contract for more than exceeding 12 months, irrespective of
164 \ 168
whether the contract is of indeterminate has an initial fixed duration exceeding 12 months or
is extended automatically or following a combination of a subsequent agreement by the
parties contracts or renewal periods exceeding 12 months.
19. Compromise amendments on right of redress (Article 17 and recital 47)
CA 82 on Article 17: right of redress
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, Greens, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including: AM 963 (De Jong),
AM 964 (Gebhardt et al.), AM 965 (Voss, Maydell), AM 966 (Zullo), AM 967 (Reda), AM
968 (Anderson et al.)
Article 17
Right of redress
Where the supplier trader is liable to the consumer because of any failure to supply the
digital content or digital service or a lack of conformity with the contract resulting from an
act or omission by a person in earlier previous links of the chain of transactions, the supplier
trader shall be entitled to pursue remedies against the person or persons liable in the chain of
financial transactions. The person against whom the supplier trader may pursue remedies
and the relevant actions and conditions of exercise, shall be determined by national law.
CA 83 on recital 47: right of redress
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, Greens, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including: AM 172 (Anderson
et al.), AM 354 (Reda), AM 355 (Voss, Maydell), AM 356 (Kallas, Charanzova)
(47) The lack of conformity with the contract of the final digital content or digital service
as supplied to the consumer is often due to one of the financial transactions in a
chain, from the original designer to the final supplier trader. While the final supplier
trader should be liable towards the consumer in case of lack of conformity with the
contract between these two parties, it is important to ensure that the supplier trader
has appropriate rights vis-a-vis different members of the chain of financial
transactions in order to be able to cover his liability towards the consumer. These
rights should be strictly limited to financial transactions and not extend to
situations where, for instance, the trader re-uses free third party software that the
trader did not pay for. However, it should be for the applicable national law to
identify the members of the chains of transactions against which the final supplier
trader can turn and the modalities and conditions of such actions. Member States
should ensure that national law adequately protects the trader when determining
the person against whom the trader may pursue remedies, the time periods and the
relevant actions and conditions of exercise.
165 \ 168
20. Compromise amendments on enforcement (Article 18 and recital 48)
CA 83bis on enforcement: Article 18
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, Greens, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including: AM 969 (Gebhardt et
al.), AM 970 (Reda), AM 971 (Gebhardt et al.), AM 972 (Gebhardt et al.), AM 973
(Gebhardt et al.), AM 974 (Reda), LIBE 48, LIBE 49
Article 18
Enforcement and information
1. Member States shall ensure that adequate and, effective and dissuasive means exist
to ensure compliance with this Directive, taking account in particular of the need
for consumers to be informed about, and enabled to enforce, their rights in
practice.
2. The means referred to in paragraph 1 shall include provisions whereby one or more
of the following bodies, as determined by national law, may take action under
national law before the courts or before the competent administrative bodies to
ensure that the national provisions transposing this Directive are applied:
(a) public bodies or their representatives;
(b) consumer organisations having a legitimate interest in protecting consumers;
(c) professional organisations having a legitimate interest in acting.;
(d) not-for-profit bodies, organisations or associations, active in the field of the
protection of data subjects' rights as defined in Art. 80 of the Regulation
(EU) 2016/679.
CA 83ter on enforcement: recital 48
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, Greens, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including: AM 358 (Marias)
(48) Persons or organisations regarded under national law as having a legitimate interest in
protecting consumer contractual and data protection rights should be afforded the right to
initiate proceedings, either before a court or before an administrative authority which is
competent to decide upon complaints or to initiate appropriate legal proceedings. These
complaints or proceedings should be sufficient as a deterent.
166 \ 168
21. Compromise amendments on Amendments to Directive 1999/44/EC,
Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004, Directive 2009/22/EC (Article 20 and recital
50)
CA 84 on Article 20
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, Greens, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including: AM 976 (Vaidere),
AM 977 (Gebhardt et al.), AM 978 (Gebhardt et al.), AM 979 pc 1 (Reda), AM 980 pc 1
(Gebhardt et al.), AM 981 (Vaidere)
Article 20
Amendments to Directive 93/13/EC, Directive 1999/44/EC, Regulation (EC)
No 2006/2004, Directive 2009/22/EC
-1. In the Annex to Directive 93/13/EC, the following points are added in paragraph 1:
"(a) enabling the trader to unduly limit the interoperability of digital content or a digital
service with hardware and other digital content or digital services;
(b) requiring the consumer to conclude an additional contract for the supply of digital
content or a digital service or a contract pertaining to hardware with the trader or a third
party;
(c) circumventing by contractual means the rights of the data subject under Regulation
(EU) 2016/679 governing the protection of consumers' personal data."
(d) restrict uses of digital content permitted under Directive 2001/29/EC, Directive
96/9/EC, Directive 2009/24/EC or Directive 2012/28/EU; [DM2]
1. In Article 1 (2) of Directive 1999/44/EC, point (b) is replaced by the following:
"(b) consumer goods: shall mean any tangible movable item, with the exception of:
goods sold by way of execution or otherwise by authority of law,
water and gas where they are not put up for sale in a limited volume or set quantity,
electricity,
167 \ 168
a durable medium incorporating digital content where it has been used exclusively as
carrier of the digital content to the consumer as referred to in embedded digital
content or digital services as covered by Directive (EU) N/XXX4."
2. In the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004, the following point is added:
"23.1. Directive (EU) N/XXX of the European Parliament and of the Council of XX/XX/201X
on certain aspects concerning contracts for the supply of digital content or digital services
(OJ…)"
3. In Annex I to Directive 2009/22/EC the following point is added:
"16. Directive (EU) N/XXX of the European Parliament and of the Council of XX/XX/201X
on certain aspects concerning contracts for the supply of digital content or digital services
(OJ…)"
CA 85 on Recital 50
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, Greens, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including: AM 359 (Gebhardt et
al.), 360 (Rozière), AM 361 (Voss, Maydell)
(50) Directive 1999/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council[1] should be
amended to reflect the scope of this Directive in relation to a durable medium incorporating
digital content where it has been used exclusively as a carrier of the digital content to the
consumer embedded digital content or digital services.
[1] OJ L 171, 7.7.1999, p.12.
4 Directive (EU) N/XXX of the European Parliament and of the Council of …. on contracts for the supply of digital content (OJ …)
168 \ 168
22. Compromise amendment on review (Article 22)
CA 86 on review: Article 22
Supported by EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE, Greens, EFDD
Compromise amendment replacing all relevant amendments, including: AM 982 (Gebhardt et
al.), AM 983 (Rozière), AM 984 (Kallas et al.), AM 985 (Ford/Dalton), AM 986 (Guoga),
AM 987 (Reda), LIBE 51
Article 22
Review
The Commission shall, not later than on [the date of five years after entry into force] review
the application of this Directive and submit a report to the European Parliament and the
Council and the European Economic and Social Committee taking full account of the
process of scrutiny and review on the application and implementation of this Directive. The
review process shall include consultation of the Member States and consumer, legal and
business organisations at Union level. The report shall examine, inter alia, interaction and
compliance with the application of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and the case for
harmonisation of rules applicable to contracts for the supply of digital content or digital
services against collection of personal data by the trader counter-performance other than that
covered by this Directive, in particular supplied against advertisement or indirect collection
of data.