Transcript
Page 1: Low Crosstalk Differential Transmission Line Interconnect

Low Crosstalk Differential Transmission Line Interconnect on Si ULSI

1. Background ・Si ULSI: Global Interconnect Freq. > GHz, Length = cm-order1, Signal wavelengths ≒ Global interconnect length2, The inductance ( L): Cannot be neglected

Interconnect must be designed as transmission line. (= RLC distribution constant circuit model)

Using the inductance positively→ High-speed signal transmission can be achieved.

3. Differential Transmission Line Structure for Long Interconnects

2. PurposeEmployment of Differential Transmission Line to Interconnect Structures on Si ULSI

Differential Transmission Line vs. Single-ended Transmission Line・Ground planes or ground lines are not required・Superior common-mode noise robustness

1. Differential Transmission Line Structure for Long Interconnects2. Robustness to Crosstalk Noise

Required characteristic of differential transmission lines1. Low losses (Large bandwidth)2. Zdiff=100Ω3. Low interconnect-resource4. No GND-plane

Si

M3

Frequency [GHz]Imag

inar

y pa

rt o

f Zdi

ff [Ω

]

-300

-200

-100

0

1 10 1000

100

200

300

1 10 100Rea

l par

t of Z

diff

[Ω]

Frequency [GHz]

Frequency [GHz]A

ttenu

atio

n [d

B/c

m]

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

1 10 100

W=1 µmW=4 µmW=8 µmW=12 µmW=16 µmW=20 µm

w 1 4 8 12 16 20

d 2.2 4.2 6.8 9.8 13.3 16.5 [µm]

Co-planar Line

FreeParameter: W, d

W Wd

+ -

Si

M3 ILDM2

Frequency [GHz]

Atte

nuat

ion

[dB

/cm

]

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

1 10 100

Rea

l par

t of Z

diff

[Ω]

Frequency [GHz]0

100

200

300

1 10 100Frequency [GHz]Im

agin

ary

part

of Z

diff

[Ω]

-300

-200

-100

0

1 10 100

w 1 4 8 12 16 20

d 1.3 3.9 7.2 10.5 14.5 18.0 [µm]

Diagonal-pair LineW Wd Free

Parameter: W, d

W=1 µmW=4 µmW=8 µmW=12 µmW=16 µmW=20 µm

+-

Stacked-pair Line

Cross-section

W = 0.29 µm

RDC = 2.4 kΩ/cm

Use: M3 & M2

Si

M3 ILDM2

+-

Film Thickness: Fixed

Free Parameter: W

→ Large DC-resistance→ It is not feasible to use such lossy line for long interconnect.

Si

M3ILD

M1

W = 1 µm

RDC =670 Ω /cm

+

-

AlSiO2

Use: M3 & M1

4. Robustness to Crosstalk Noise

5. Conclusion & Future Work

+ - + -

4 µm 4 µm4.2 µm

Line Pitch

+

-

+

-

4 µm 4 µm3.9 µm

Line Pitch

+

-

+

-

ILD : 3 µm

4 µm 4 µm2.6 µm

Line Pitch

+

-

+

-

4 µm 4 µm1.2 µm

Line Pitch

Co-planar Line

Diagonal-pair Line

Diagonal-pair Linewith Thick ILD

Diagonal-pair Lineof Cu/Low-k (εr=2)

Zdiff=100Ω (for Lossless Metal)

Consideration oftransmission line structures

Line Parameter: AMS 0.35 µm CMOSM3: 0.9µm, M2&M1: 0.6µm, ILD: 1µm

EM SimulationAnsoft 2D Extractor

Forward Crosstalk Coefficient@ Line Length l: 1cm   Rise Time tr: 10psec

Backward Crosstalk Coefficient

Crosstalk Margin :| Crosstalk Coefficient | ≦ 0.05

×: Individual Inductance, Capacitance: Mutual Inductance, Capacitance

Line Pitch [µm]

Cro

ssta

lk C

oeffi

cien

t

-0.4

-0.2

0

0.2

0.4

4 6 8 10 12 14 16Line Pitch [µm]

Cro

ssta

lk C

oeffi

cien

t

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

12 14 16 18 20 22 24

Line Pitch [µm]

Cro

ssta

lk C

oeffi

cien

t

-0.4

-0.2

0

0.2

0.4

4 6 8 10 12 14 16Line Pitch [µm]

Cro

ssta

lk C

oeffi

cien

t

-0.4

-0.2

0

0.2

0.4

4 6 8 10 12 14 16

Kf12Kb12Kf13Kb13

Co-planar Line Diagonal-pair Line

Diagonal-pair Linewith Thick ILD

Diagonal-pair Linewith Cu/Low-k

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

4 6 8 10 12 14 16Line Pitch [µm]

Diagonal-pair Line

Capacitive = InductiveCoupling Coefficient:

→ Kf12 = 0

Coupling Coefficient (pair1 - pair2)

8.1µm ≦ Line Pitch≦ 8.6µm12.6 µm ≦ Line Pitch

5.0µm ≦ Line Pitch≦ 5.2µm11.2 µm ≦ Line Pitch

15.7 µm ≦ Line Pitch

18.2 µm ≦ Line Pitch

Line Pitch18.2µm

pair 1 pair 2 pair 3

8.1µm

pair 1 pair 2 pair 3

5.0µm

pair 1 pair 2 pair 3

15.7µm

pair 1 pair 2 pair 3

Co-planar Line

Diagonal-pair Line

Thick ILD

Cu/Low-k

-14%

-56%

-73%

-62% vs. Co-planar Line of Cu/Low-k

1. Co-planar and diagonal-pair lines have superior attenuation-characteristics as a long interconnect.2. Diagonal-pair lines reduce the line pitch and crosstalk noise concurrently. → Better design-flexibility for Si ULSI→ Comparison between the electromagnetic simulation and the mesurement

Line Pitch vs.Crosstalk Noise(Differential-mode Noise)

Common-modeNoise→ Cancel

Differential-modeNoise

+

-

+

-

+

-

H. Ito, K. Okada, K. Masu

Recommended