Transcript
Page 1: Mapping the DNA Damage Response

Case study reveals transcription factor (TF) modules, dynamic TF binding and an expanded role for cell cycle regulators

Mapping the DNA Damage Response

Page 2: Mapping the DNA Damage Response

Overview

• Experimental factors and selection– Multiple criteria used

• ChIP-on-chip– Differential binding analysis

• Gene expression of TF-deletion mutants– Clustering analysis– Deletion-buffering analysis

• Data integration and pathway reconstruction

Page 3: Mapping the DNA Damage Response

Overview of the approach

Page 4: Mapping the DNA Damage Response

Overview of the approach

Page 5: Mapping the DNA Damage Response

Overview of the approach

Page 6: Mapping the DNA Damage Response

Transcription factors that regulate DNA damage response

Activated regulatory network

Page 7: Mapping the DNA Damage Response

Transcription factors that regulate DNA damage response

TF knockout

“Deletion-buffered”

Activated regulatory network

Page 8: Mapping the DNA Damage Response

Growth phenotype in MMS: mutants that display relative growth inhibition

Page 9: Mapping the DNA Damage Response

Truncated Product Method (TPM): determine condition dependent binding

Page 10: Mapping the DNA Damage Response

ChIP-chip of 30 TFs before and after DNA damage

YPD MMS+/-MMS

TPM

Page 11: Mapping the DNA Damage Response

ChIP-chip Data Summary

Workman CT, Mak HC, McCuine S, Tagne JB, Agarwal M, Ozier O, Begley TJ, Samson LD, Ideker T. A systems approach to mapping DNA damage response pathways. Science. 2006 May 19;312(5776):1054-9.

TFs may regulate different genes (bind different promoters) under different conditions.

Page 12: Mapping the DNA Damage Response
Page 13: Mapping the DNA Damage Response

Promoter regions analysisChIP-chip and DNA-Motif

Page 14: Mapping the DNA Damage Response

TF-Knockout expression profiles:(look much like wild-type)

Page 15: Mapping the DNA Damage Response

Environmental “epistasis analysis”:(deletion-buffering)

Page 16: Mapping the DNA Damage Response

Deletion-buffering analysis

Bayesian Score

Page 17: Mapping the DNA Damage Response

Deletion-buffering examples

Page 18: Mapping the DNA Damage Response

RNR Genes are repressed by Rfx1p

Page 19: Mapping the DNA Damage Response

Sensitive TFs are required for a greater number of damage responsive genes

Page 20: Mapping the DNA Damage Response

Integrated model(regulatory paths explaining buffered genes)

Page 21: Mapping the DNA Damage Response

Pathway reconstruction

Page 22: Mapping the DNA Damage Response

Pathway reconstruction

Page 23: Mapping the DNA Damage Response

Pathway reconstruction

Page 24: Mapping the DNA Damage Response

Integrated direct and indirect regulatory pathways (chIP-chip, prot-prot) that explain deletion-buffering relationships

Workman CT, Mak HC, McCuine S, Tagne JB, Agarwal M, Ozier O, Begley TJ, Samson LD, Ideker T. A systems approach to mapping DNA damage response pathways. Science. 2006 May 19;312(5776):1054-9.

Page 25: Mapping the DNA Damage Response

Summary

• “Sensitive” TFs control more of the DNA damage response than non-sensitive TFs

• Regulatory networks are highly interconnected

• Transcriptional regulation of important DNA damage checkpoint kinases are observed

• Measuring differential TF-binding is difficult


Recommended