MELANIE F. LEMOINE, PH.D.CO-DIRECTOR
MONICA K. BALLAY, M.ED.EVALUATOR
WWW.LASIG2.ORG
“LaSIG 2: Sustaining Practice through Goal
Setting and Data”
Project Background
Continuation of LaSIGFocus on scaling up and sustainability
Move from school level to district level
14 Districts throughout the stateFramework for district & school improvement
5/05
WestFeliciana
Washington
St. Tammany
Tangipahoa
St.Helena
Livingston
CoupeePt.
East
Avoyelles
EBRWBR
Iberville RSD St.
John
St. Charles
St. Charles
St. Bernard
Plaquemines
Jefferson
AscensionSt.
JamessAssumption
LafourcheSt.Mary
Terrebonne
BeauregardAllen
Calcasieu
Cameron
JeffersonDavis
Evangeline
St. Landry
Acadia
Vermilion
Lafayette
St.Martin
Iberia
VernonRapides
Winn
Grant
LaSalle Catahoula Concordia
Caldwell
Natchitoches
Caddo
Bossier
RedRiverDeSoto
Sabine
Webster
Bienville
Claiborne
Lincoln
Jackson
Union Morehouse
OuachitaRichland
FranklinTensas
Madison
CarrollWest East Carroll
LaSIG 2 Districts 2008-2009
14 Districts
Assumption
EBR Rapides
Livingston
Caddo
Calcasieu
DeSoto
Vermilion
Plaquemines
RSD
Jefferson
Catahoula
EastCarroll
District & School Support
Annual Allocation to support initiatives Schools and Districts ID improvement initiatives Districts develop 5 year plan to participate
Site Liaison assigned to each district Provide on-going support Link to resources
Family Facilitator assigned to each district Goodwill Ambassador to build partnerships between
school and families
District 5 Year Plan
Identify improvement initiative based on current data
Must include in the plan: Tiered interventions Universal accessibility Family initiative Disproportionality Job Embedded PD Data
Logic Model
Ensuring SustainabilityChange in PracticeGoal Attainment Scale
Each district plan includes measurable goals Progress reviewed twice a year 5 Year plan and GAS used to guide the districts
Data Collection Quarterly data collected
LRE, Attendance, Behavior (by general ed, special ed, and ethnicity)
Goal Attainment Scale (GAS)
GOAL 1-STATE LEVEL
OBJECTIVE:
ANTICIPATED OUTCOME:
Degree of Attainment
Current Status
-2 -1 0 1 2
Objective 1.1 Coordinate key professional development initiatives.
Meet 90% of identified anticipated outcomes for the objective’s activities.
80% 85% 90% 95% 100% 75%
1.1.1 Invite representatives from each initiative to annual planning meeting. Establish quarterly meetings to review progress and adjust efforts.
90% of invited initiatives participate in planning and quarterly meetings.
80% 85% 90% 95% 100% 64.7%
Tool to measure the degree of attainment based on goals, objectives, and activities of 5 year plan.
Scale range from -2 to 2: 0 = goal has been met -2, -1 goal has not been met 1, 2 goal has been exceeded
Four LaSIG GoalsState, District, School, Individual levels
17 objectives and 71 different activities LaSIG GAS is measured quarterly and
annually
5 Year District Plan = District GAS
1st step – the districts wrote a 5 year plan with goals, objectives, activities based on the needs of district.
2nd step – create a goal attainment scale tool for district based on 5 year plan to assess progress. The plan is assessed at mid-term and end of year by district level leadership team.
3rd step – evaluate the outcome of plan at end of the year.
(see example of district 5 year plan and GAS)
Data-Driven DecisionsTraditionally schools/districts view data at the
endof the school year.
Online Data Reporting System
Proactive approach utilizing dataSchools/districts are analyzing data quarterlyQuarterly data used at monthly meetings (SIT,
PBS, etc.) to drive decisions.
Online LaSIG Data Reporting System
Annually – Demographic ReportMonthly – Activity ReportQuarterly
Placement Discipline Attendance
www.lasig2.org