Transcript
Page 1: Meta-Metrics: Building a Scorecard for the Evaluation of Security Management and Control Frameworks

Meta-Metrics:Building a Scorecard for the Evaluation of Security Management and Control Frameworks

Meta-Metrics:Building a Scorecard for the Evaluation of Security Management and Control Frameworks

Michael SmithMetricon 5.0 08/10/2010

Page 2: Meta-Metrics: Building a Scorecard for the Evaluation of Security Management and Control Frameworks

2

Laws, Sausages, and Frameworks? Top-down: regulation->policy->procedures -

>technical Organic growth: tech->architecture->policy Throw in the kitchen sink, built a checklist,

rinse, repeat Lessons learned: Company X got pwned so

you have to pay for their crimes Years of analysis: extended PhD thesis The Gray-Hair approach, I know better than

you2

Page 3: Meta-Metrics: Building a Scorecard for the Evaluation of Security Management and Control Frameworks

3

The Part Where Mike Gets Meta

“The nature of all security frameworks is to devolve into a checklist” --Rybolov

All frameworks suck, the one you’re using sucks the worst

Management by inclusion v/s exclusion

Build a rational way to judge frameworks

3

Page 4: Meta-Metrics: Building a Scorecard for the Evaluation of Security Management and Control Frameworks

4

Framework Scorecard

$$$$$Small, Medium, Large

Organizations

Page 5: Meta-Metrics: Building a Scorecard for the Evaluation of Security Management and Control Frameworks

5

Framework Scorecard

$$$$$Small, Medium, Large

Organizations

EfficacyTactical/Technical

Patch and Vulnerability

Page 6: Meta-Metrics: Building a Scorecard for the Evaluation of Security Management and Control Frameworks

6

Framework Scorecard

$$$$$Small, Medium, Large

Organizations

EfficacyTactical/Technical

Patch and Vulnerability

CompletenessSustainable Program

Page 7: Meta-Metrics: Building a Scorecard for the Evaluation of Security Management and Control Frameworks

7

Framework Scorecard

$$$$$Small, Medium, Large

Organizations

EfficacyTactical/Technical

Patch and Vulnerability

CompletenessSustainable Program

?Robustness?Shelfware-Resistance

Low-MaintenanceAtomicity v/s Dependence

Page 8: Meta-Metrics: Building a Scorecard for the Evaluation of Security Management and Control Frameworks

8

SWAG Reactions: ISO 27002

$$Reasonably large

Some Guidelines

Reasonably CompleteOK Robust, some audit

burden and rework

Page 9: Meta-Metrics: Building a Scorecard for the Evaluation of Security Management and Control Frameworks

9

SWAG Reactions: PCI-DSS

Relatively Small Mostly Tactical

Bollocks for SustainableHas “Policy”

Robustness as a function of small size

Page 10: Meta-Metrics: Building a Scorecard for the Evaluation of Security Management and Control Frameworks

10

SWAG Reactions: NIST RMF

Much CostPrescribed but not the

focus due to abstraction

The Whole Hawg of Completeness

Horribly fragile, this adds significantly to the cost

Page 11: Meta-Metrics: Building a Scorecard for the Evaluation of Security Management and Control Frameworks

11

Uses

Conscious design of security, compliance, regulation, risk, etc frameworks

Prioritization of effort Split-horizon assessment/audit Maturity models Ending “Legislation Amateur Hour”

11

Page 12: Meta-Metrics: Building a Scorecard for the Evaluation of Security Management and Control Frameworks

12

OMG What Have I done?

Have I built a better GRC and should I be hanged from the neck until I am dead?

Is an abstract of an abstract leading to a divide-by-zero error that will end the world?

Have I lost my bloody mind?

12

Page 13: Meta-Metrics: Building a Scorecard for the Evaluation of Security Management and Control Frameworks

16

Questions, Comments, or War Stories?http://www.guerilla-ciso.com/

rybolov(a)ryzhe.ath.cx


Recommended