TTTTEEEE
SSSSTTTT
RRRREEEE
PPPPOOOO
RRRRTTTT
OMEGA POINTLABORATORIES, INC.16015 Shady Falls Road
Elmendorf, TX 78112(v) 210-635-8100(f) 210-635-8101
800-966-5253www.opl.com
MMMMOOOODDDDIIIIFFFFIIIIEEEEDDDD AAAASSSSTTTTMMMM EEEE 1111333355554444CCCCOOOONNNNEEEE CCCCAAAALLLLOOOORRRRIIIIMMMMEEEETTTTEEEERRRR
TTTTHHHHEEEERRRRMMMMAAAALLLL RRRREEEESSSSPPPPOOOONNNNSSSSEEEE TTTTEEEESSSSTTTT((((FFFFiiiinnnnaaaallll RRRReeeeppppoooorrrrtttt))))
Reflectec Thermal Fabric&
Reflectec Fiberboard
Project No. 16723-113972
April 22, 2003
Prepared for:
John W. Mallette Sr..311 Flannan Rd Ste A-100Pensacola, Fl 32507-3160
MMMMOOOODDDDIIIIFFFFIIIIEEEEDDDD AAAASSSSTTTTMMMM EEEE 1111333355554444CCCCOOOONNNNEEEE CCCCAAAALLLLOOOORRRRIIIIMMMMEEEETTTTEEEERRRR
TTTTHHHHEEEERRRRMMMMAAAALLLL RRRREEEESSSSPPPPOOOONNNNSSSSEEEE TTTTEEEESSSSTTTT((((FFFFiiiinnnnaaaallll RRRReeeeppppoooorrrrtttt))))
Reflectec Thermal Fabric&
Reflectec Fiberboard
Project No. 16723-113972
April 22, 2003
Prepared for:
John W. Mallette Sr..311 Flannan Rd Ste A-100Pensacola, Fl 32507-3160
OM
EGA POIN
T
LAB
ORATORI
ES
®
Omega Point Laboratories, Inc.16015 Shady Falls Road
Elmendorf, Texas 78112-9784210-635-8100 / FAX: 210-635-8101 / 800-966-5253
www.opl.com / e-mail: [email protected]
AbstractThermal Response testing using the Cone Calorimeter (ASTM E 1354) was performed onspecimens submitted by John W. Mallette Sr. The Reflectec Thermal Fabric specimens wereapproximately 4.5 inches square, 1/4 inch thick and the Reflectec Fiberboard wasapoproximately 6 inch square and 1/8 inch thick. The testing procedure was according to anagreement with John W. Mallette Co. and Omega Point Laboratories in which the ConeCalorimeter was used to expose the top side of the specimens to radiative heat flux whilemeasuring the temperatures of the top surface, the bottom surface, and 1/2 inch below thespecimen. The results are in terms of bottom side temperatures as a function of top sidesurface temperatures.
This report and the information contained herein is for the exclusive use of the client namedherein. Omega Point Laboratories, Inc. authorizes the client to reproduce this report only i freproduced in its entirety. The description of the test procedure, as well as the observations andresults obtained, contained herein are true and accurate within the limits of sound engineeringpractice. These results apply only for the specimens tested, in the manner tested, and may notrepresent the performance of other specimens from the same or other production lots nor of theperformance when used in combination with other materials. The test specimen identification isas provided by the client and Omega Point Laboratories, Inc. accepts no responsibility for anyinaccuracies therein. Omega Point did not select the specimen and has not verified thecomposition, manufacturing techniques or quality assurance procedures. This report does notimply certification of the product by Omega Point Laboratories, Inc. Any use of the Omega PointLaboratories name, any abbreviation thereof or any logo, mark, or symbol therefor, for ad-vertising material must be approved in writing in advance by Omega Point Laboratories, Inc. Theclient must have entered into and be actively participating in a Listing & Follow-up Serviceprogram. Products must bear labels with the Omega Point Laboratories Certification Mark todemonstrate acceptance by Omega Point Laboratories, Inc. into the Listing program.
Date: April 22, 2003 Javier O. TrevinoManager, Special Projects
Reviewed and approved:
William E. Fitch, P.E. No. 55296 Date: April 22, 2003 Executive Vice President
Project No. 16723-113972 April 22, 2003John Mallette Sr. Page iii
LA
BORATOR
IES
OM
EGA POIN
T
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ITEM PAGE
Introduction 1
Test Procedure 1
Test Specimen Description 2
Test Results and Observations 2
Appendices
Appendix A: Thermocouple Data 5
Appendix B: Photographs 9
Last Page of Report 11
Project No. 16723-113972 April 22, 2003John Mallette Sr. Pg 1
INTRODUCTION
The tests described herein were conducted in accordance with a modified versionof ASTM E1354 Standard Test Method. The test method for this series of tests isbased on the observation that radiant heat applied to a surface will provide atemperature increase on that surface.
The testing procedure was according to an agreement with John W. Mallette Sr.,and Omega Point Laboratories in which the Cone Calorimeter was used to exposethe top side of the specimens to radiative heat flux while measuring thetemperatures of the top surface, the bottom surface, and 1/2 inch below thespecimen. The results are in terms of bottom side temperatures as a function oftop side surface temperatures.
TEST PROCEDURE
To assist the reader in understanding the test apparatus and procedures, Figure1, at the end of the text of this report, contains a schematic drawing of the conecalorimeter apparatus.
In this test method, an electrically heated radiant energy source in the shape of atruncated cone is positioned 75 mm (3 in.) from the surface of the specimen andproduces an irradiance level over surface area of the specimen. The specimen ispositioned horizontally. The specimen is mounted using a customized specimenholder that allowed air to move freely above and below the specimen. The framereduces the effective exposed surface area of the specimen to approximately 16square inches (4” x 4”).
The temperatures of the top side (hot side)and bottom side (cold side) of thespecimen are measured with 24 ga. type K thermocouples. Generally,thermocouple #1 (TC #1) was placed in contact with the top surface, TC #2 wasplaced 1/2” below the specimen surface (at the request of the client) and TC #3 wasplaced in contact with the surface of the bottom side of the specimen. Thetemperatures were recorded using a computerized data acquisition system as afunction of time.
Project No. 16723-113972 April 22, 2003John Mallette Sr. Pg 2
DESCRIPTION AND PREPARATION OF TEST SPECIMENS
The test specimens arrived with the client the morning of April 8, 2003.
Specimens submitted by: John Mallette Sr.
Date received: April 8, 2003
Date(s) tested: April 8, 2003
Type of material: Reflectec Thermal Fabric and Reflectec Fiberboard
Identification number(s): N/A
Description and size: Test #1 and #2: Reflectec Thermal Fabric: Multi-layeredfabric w/ Nomex outer layer on both sides. Approx 1/4” thick. Test #3:Reflectec Fiberboard: Fiberboard w/ aluminum foil facer on both sides.Approx. 1/8” thick.
Specimen preparation and mounting method: Test #1: Reflectec Thermal Fabric(Dry) mounted such that 4” x 4” was exposed to the radiant flux of heat. Test#2: Reflectec Thermal Fabric (Moist on Cold Side) mounted such that 4” x 4”was exposed to the radiant flux of heat. Test #3: Reflectec Fiberboard (Dry)mounted such that 4” x 4” was exposed to the radiant flux of heat.
TEST RESULTS
Results from these tests are presented in the following formats:
Individual Test Data Plots (Appendix A)
Summary Tables (Next Page)
Photographs (Appendix B).
Project No. 16723-113972 April 22, 2003John Mallette Sr. Pg 3
TABLE 1: Reflectec Thermal Fabric Results:Topside Surface Temperature Approx 200 deg C
SpecimenName
Temp TopsideSurface (deg C)
Temp 1/2” Below(deg C)
Temp UndersideSurface (deg C)
Reflectec ThermalFabric(Dry)
97.8 23.9 N/A
Reflectec ThermalFabric(moist underside)
98.7 24.7 43.7
N/A = During this test, the temperature of the underside surface was not measured.
TABLE 2: Reflectec Thermal Fabric Results:Topside Surface Temperature at end of Test
SpecimenName
Temp TopsideSurface (deg C)
Temp 1/2” Below(deg C)
Temp UndersideSurface (deg C)
Reflectec ThermalFabric(Dry)
236.5 29.2 N/A
Reflectec ThermalFabric(moist underside)
222.9 31.3 76.3
N/A = During this test, the temperature of the underside surface was not measured.
TABLE 3: Reflectec Fiberboard ResultsResults at approx 200 deg C & at end of tesr
SpecimenName
Temp TopsideSurface (deg C)
Temp 1/2” Below(deg C)
Temp UndersideSurface (deg C)
ReflectecFiberboard(Dry)
97.5 25.4 54.1
ReflectecFiberboard(Dry)
296 37.6 139
Project No. 16723-113972 April 22, 2003John Mallette Sr. Pg 4
Cone Heater
Test Specimen
Load Cell
Spark Igniter
Gas Sampling Ring
Orifice Plate
Exhaust Duct
Exhaust Blower
Cold Trap
Dessicant
CO2 Removal
To O2 Analyzer
To CO, CO2 Analyzers
Particulate Filter
Laser Smoke Meter
Exhaust Hood
Figure 1. Schematic Drawing of the Cone Calorimeter (ASTM E1354)
Project No. 16723-113972 April 22, 2003John Mallette Sr. Pg 5
Appendix A
Thermocouple Data Plots
Test #1 Reflectec Thermal Fabric (Dry)TC #1 Hot Side Touching Fabric
TC #2 Cold Side 1/2" Below Fabric
01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 0
100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250
0
2.6
5.2
7.8
10
.4 13
15
.6
18
.2
20
.8
23
.4 26
28
.6
31
.2
33
.8
36
.4 39
41
.6
44
.2
46
.8
49
.4 52
54
.6
57
.2
59
.8
62
.4 65
67
.6
70
.2
72
.8
75
.4 78
80
.6
83
.2
Time (min)
Tem
p (
deg
C)
TC #1
TC #2
Test #2 Reflectec Thermal Fabric (Moist on Cold Side)TC #1 Hot Side Touching Fabric
TC #2 Cold Side 1/2" Below FabricTC #3 Cold Side Touching Fabric
01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 0
100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240
0
2.3
6
4.7
2
7.0
8
9.4
3
11
.8
14
.2
16
.5
18
.9
21
.2
23
.6
25
.9
28
.3
30
.7 33
35
.4
37
.7
40
.1
42
.5
44
.8
47
.2
49
.5
51
.9
54
.2
56
.6 59
61
.3
63
.7 66
68
.4
70
.8
73
.1
75
.5
Time (min)
Tem
p (
deg
C)
TC #1
TC #2
TC #3
Test #3 Reflectec FiberboardTC #1 Hot Side Touching Foil Facer
TC #2 Cold Side 1/2" From Foil FacerTC #3 Cold Side Touching Foil Facer
01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 0
100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320
0
1.4
3
2.8
5
4.2
8
5.7
7.1
3
8.5
5
9.9
8
11
.4
12
.8
14
.3
15
.7
17
.1
18
.5 20
21
.4
22
.8
24
.2
25
.7
27
.1
28
.5
29
.9
31
.4
32
.8
34
.2
35
.6
37
.1
38
.5
39
.9
41
.3
42
.8
44
.2
45
.6
Time (min)
Tem
p (
deg
C)
TC #1
TC #2
TC #3
Project No. 16723-113972 April 22, 2003John W. Mallette, Sr. APPENDIX B Pg 9
LA
BORATOR
IES
OM
EGA POIN
T
Appendix B
Photographs
Project No. 16723-113972 April 22, 2003John W. Mallette, Sr. APPENDIX B Pg 10
LA
BORATOR
IES
OM
EGA POIN
T
The Cone Calorimeter w/ Specimen in Place w/ Thermocouples
The Cone Calorimeter Radiant Cone Energized
Project No. 16723-113972 April 22, 2003John W. Mallette, Sr. APPENDIX B Pg 11
LA
BORATOR
IES
OM
EGA POIN
T
Test Specimens #1 (Left) and #2 (Right) after test.Left degraded at 236.5 deg C: Right degraded at 222.9 degC
Test Specimen #3 After TestSpecimen Temperature at end of test was 296 deg C