Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
1
Presentation topics Overview of Office of Proposal Development Generic competitive proposal writing
strategies Identifying external funding Analyzing the funding agency Reading the proposal solicitation Understanding the review process Craft of Proposal Writing
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
2
Office of proposal development A unit of the Office of Vice President for
Research at Texas A&M University, partnered with: Office of Vice Chancellor for Research and
Federal Relations, Office of Vice Chancellor for Academic and
Student Affairs, and the Health Science Center
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
3
Office of proposal development Supports faculty in the development and writing of
large and small research grants to federal agencies and foundations.
Focuses on support of center-level initiatives, multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary research teams, research affinity groups, new and junior faculty research, diversity in the research enterprise, and long-term proposal planning.
Helps develop partnership initiatives at Texas A&M, across the A&M System universities, and HSC.
Supports proposal development activities and training programs to help new faculty write more competitive proposals.
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
4
Office of proposal development Jean Ann Bowman, Research Scientist
B.S., Journalism; B.S. and Ph.D., Hydrology and Physical Geography Focuses on proposals dealing with earth, ecological, and environmental
sciences, as well as those dealing with agriculture. Libby Childress, Administrative Assistant
Handles scheduling, resources, and project coordination. Mike Cronan, Director
B.S., Civil Engineering (Structures); B.A., Political Science; M.A., English; Registered Professional Engineer, Texas (063512) Helps develop partnerships. Leads center- and program-level proposals.
Establishes new initiatives and sets the direction of the office. Lucy Deckard, Associate Director
B.S. and M.S., Materials Science and Engineering Leads the new faculty initiatives. Focuses on proposals dealing with the
physical sciences, interdisciplinary materials group, and equipment and instrumentation. Also leads training seminars on graduate and postdoctoral fellowships, undergraduate research, and CAREER awards.
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
5
Office of proposal development Susan Maier, Research Development Officer
B.A., M.A., and Ph.D., Psychology Focuses on the Health Science Center’s NIH biomedical science
initiatives, as well as on the HSC’s University partnership initiatives. Leads training seminars on NIH.
Phyllis McBride, Assistant Director B.A., Journalism and English; M.A. and Ph.D., English Leads the one-day Craft of Grant Writing Seminars and the
fifteen-week Craft of Grant Writing Workshops. Focuses on DHS and NIH initiatives, and provides editing and rewriting.
Robyn Pearson, Research Development Officer B.A. and M.A., Anthropology Focuses on proposals dealing with the humanities, liberal arts,
and social and behavioral sciences, and education. Provides support for the development of interdisciplinary research groups and provides editing and rewriting.
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
6
Identifying external funding Self-directed searches of funding agency web sites
combined with the use of Google, Yahoo or other search tools are highly effective and efficient ways of identifying research and educational funding opportunities for the university researcher.
Individual researchers have the most substantive and nuanced understanding of their research interests, directions, and capacities, and therefore it is most productive if the searches for research opportunities are primarily filtered through their own perspectives.
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
7
Funding opportunities search criteria Define disciplinary domain of interest (e.g.,
science, social sciences, humanities, education, health and biomedical sciences, engineering);
Characterize the nature of the research (basic, applied, applications);
Identify a subset of funding agencies whose mission, strategic plan, and investment priorities are aligned with these specific research interests.
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
8
Refining the funding search Identify research opportunities with regular
grant cycles within a particular agency (e.g., NIH and NSF have regular grant cycles of specific research programs that remain open for many years;
Identify new research opportunities and investment directions at funding agencies;
Expand the base of potential research funding sources.
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
9
Google is your best friend! Google and Yahoo searches offer a robust
complement to known web sites containing funding opportunities information.
A modified question used as the search text string will identify sites helpful in the search for funding opportunities, help narrow the focus of the search, and in many cases identify funding sources perhaps unknown to the researcher.
The search text may be as simple as “funding undergraduate research”, “funding graduate fellowships”, or “research funding alerts.”
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
10
Google is your best friend!
http://www.google.com/ http://www.yahoo.com/ Search for research opportunities Find funded programs, abstracts Find workshops, conferences, seminars Find reports, publications, project documents
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
11
Six major funders for TAMU-System
Funding Agency URL Hotlink to Funding Opportunities
National Science Foundation http://www.nsf.gov/funding/
Health & Human Services &NIH Grants & Funding
http://www.dhhs.gov/grants/index.shtmlhttp://grants2.nih.gov/grants/index.cfm
NASA Research Opportunities http://nspires.nasaprs.com/external/
Environmental Protection Agency
http://www.epa.gov/ogd/competition/open_awards.htm
Department of DefenseDARPAArmy Research OfficeNaval Research OfficeAir Force Research Office
http://www.darpa.mil/baa/http://www.aro.ncren.net/research/index.htmhttp://www.onr.navy.mil/default.asphttp://www.afosr.af.mil/oppts/afrfund.htm#Research
USDA/CSREES http://www.csrees.usda.gov/qlinks/research.html
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
12
Fedgrants.gov
One of the best portals to funding opportunities Tabular listing current funding opportunities and
URLs for 45 research funding agencies (see following slide)
FedGrants http://www.fedgrants.gov/Applicants/index.html
FedGrants Grants Synopsis Search http://www.fedgrants.gov/grants/servlet/SearchServlet/
FedGrants Notification Service http://www.fedgrants.gov/ApplicantRegistration.html
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
13
FedGrants
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
14
Federal Grants Notification Service
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
15
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
16
Grants.gov
Home page: http://www.grants.gov To receive automated funding alerts tailored to your
research interests, visit http://www.grants.gov/Find#receive.
Select one of four automated funding alert options: “Selected Notices Based on Funding Opportunity Number,” “Selected Agencies and Categories of Funding Activities,” “Selected Interest and Eligibility Groups,” or “All Grants Notices.”
Click on the link for the option that best suits your needs, enter the required information, and click on the “Submit to Mailing List” button.
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
17
Grants.gov
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
18
Electronic Funding Alert Services/ Email NSF, National Science Foundation
http://www.nsf.gov/mynsf/ MyNSF, formerly the Custom News Service,
allows you to receive notifications about new content posted on the NSF website.
Notification can be received via email or RSS.
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
19
MyNSF
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
20
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
21
Electronic Funding Alert Services/ Email NIH National Institutes of Health Listserv
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/listserv.htm Each week (usually on Friday afternoon), the NIH
transmits an e-mail with Table of Contents (TOC) information for that week's issue of the NIH Guide, via the NIH LISTSERV.
The TOC includes a link to the Current NIH Guide Weekly Publication as well as links to each NIH Guide RFA, PA and Notice published for that week.
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
22
NIH Guide LISTSERV
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
23
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
24
Electronic Funding Alert Services/ Email National Aeronautics and Space Administration
http://research.hq.nasa.gov/subs.cfm Once you are registered for this service you can receive
email notification of the release of research announcements pertaining to any or all of NASA offices.
National Center for Environmental Research, Environmental Protection Agency http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncer_list/elists/ Use this page to subscribe or unsubscribe to the NCER e-
mail mailing list. NCER periodically sends out emails to our subscribers announcing new grant and/or funding opportunities or highlight new documents in specific subject areas.
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
25
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
26
NCER E-mail Lists
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
27
Electronic Funding Alert Services/ Email U.S. Dept. of Education, EDINFO
http://listserv.ed.gov/cgi-bin/wa?A1=ind05&L=edinfo Information from & about the U.S. Department of Education
publications, funding opportunities & more. NEH Connect, National Endowment for the
Humanities http://www.neh.gov/news/nehconnect.html Stay connected to the humanities with NEH Connect! Each
month NEH Connect! delivers the latest news, projects, upcoming events, and grant deadlines from NEH.
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
28
EDInfo: Archives
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
29
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
30
NEH Connect!
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
31
Centers for Disease Control & Prevention The Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) allows users to subscribe to several mailing lists via the CDC World Wide Web site.
To subscribe, go to http://www.cdc.gov/subscribe.html and fill out the on-line form.
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
32
Subscribe to a CDC Mailing List
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
33
DOE Pulse & JUST INFO
Department of Energy. DOE Pulse, a bimonthy newsletter, highlights work being done at the Department of Energy's national laboratories. Each issue will include research highlights, updates on collaborations among laboratories, and profiles of individual researchers. To subscribe, go to http://www.ornl.gov/news/pulse/pulse_home.htm.
Department of Justice. JUST INFO, sponsored by the U.S. Department of Justice National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS), is a biweekly e-mail newsletter that reports on a wide variety of criminal justice topics. To subscribe, send a message to [email protected] . In the body of the message, type: subscribe JUSTINFO <your full name>.
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
34
Here's What's New at the National Labs
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
35
National Institute for Standards and Technology NIST Update is a bimonthly report that
highlights research, activities and services at National Institute for Standards and Technology.
To begin receiving e-mail copies, sign up at http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/mailform.htm
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
36
National Institute of Standards & Technology
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
37
NCHRP
Transit Cooperative Research Program and the National Cooperative Highway Research Program
To register to receive e-mail notification that Requests for Proposals have been published on the NCHRP and TCRP Homepage, just complete the form on web at http://www4.nas.edu/trb/crpmail.nsf/registration.
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
38
National Cooperative Highway Research Program
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
39
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
40
Leveraging the internet in funding search VPR/Office of Proposal Development
VPR/OPD Funding Opportunities Table http://anthropology.tamu.edu/downloads/ResearchFunding.pdf
Monthly compilation of upcoming funding opportunities in all academic disciplines distributed System-wide by email
Subscribe: [email protected]
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
41
Leveraging the internet in funding search Duke University Funding Alert Newsletter
http://www.ors.duke.edu/index.html Arts & Humanities; Community Development;
Curriculum Development Environmental & Life Sciences; Funding News;
Graduate Funding Health Sciences; International Opportunities;
Multidisciplinary Physical Sciences & Engineering; Postdoctoral
Funding; Social Sciences
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
42
Duke University Research Support
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
43
Leveraging the internet in funding search University of Iowa, Funding Opportunities
http://research.uiowa.edu/grantTrack/grantbulletin.php Arts and Humanities; Biological Sciences; International;
Multidisciplinary; Physical & Mathematical Sciences; Social Sciences
Iowa State Opportunities by Due Date http://www.vpresearch.iastate.edu/OSP/FundingOpportunities.html
http://www.vpresearch.iastate.edu/OSP/Maillogs.html Michigan State U. Graduate Fellowship Listings
http://www.lib.msu.edu/harris23/grants/3gradinf.htm Michigan State University provides links to fellowship
funding lists in over 40 different academic disciplines.
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
44
University Iowa Grant Bulletin
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
45
Weekly Funding Opportunities
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
46
Leveraging the internet in funding search Townsend Center for the Humanities, UC Berkeley
http://townsendcenter.berkeley.edu/postdocs.shtml This is excellent listing of national Postdoctoral fellowships in the
humanities organized in a table of URLs.
The University of California at Berkeley http://www.spo.berkeley.edu/funding.html Links to table of programs, profiles, and URLs for
researchers seeking funding in the following areas: Faculty Individual Prizes and Awards, Equipment Grants, New and Young Faculty Grants, Travel Grants, Women and Minorities Grants, and Postdoctoral Funding in the Biosciences.
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
47
Leveraging the internet in funding search U. Massachusetts New Faculty Research Funding
This site offers an excellent, comprehensive compilation of federal agency and foundation research awards targeting tenure track faculty in the following areas: Agriculture & Food Science, Arts & Humanities, Cancer, Chemical Sciences, Computer & Information Science, Education, Engineering, Environmental Science, Health & Medical, History, Mathematics, Neuroscience, Nursing, Physical & Life Sciences, Religion, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Science Education
http://www.umass.edu/research/ogca/funding/newfacultydisc.html
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
48
Leveraging the internet in funding search Funding for New Faculty & Junior Investigators
http://www.umass.edu/research/ogca/funding/newfacultydisc.html http://www.physics.harvard.edu/grants.htm http://www.unh.edu/osr/funding/support/young_pi.pdf http://www.sfsu.edu/~ptf/docs/NewInvestigatorAwards.pdf http://www.spo.berkeley.edu/Fund/newfaculty.html http://grants.nih.gov/grants/new_investigators/index.htm http://www.columbia.edu/cu/opg/fund/newinvest-1102.pdf
Above URLs at various universities offer a fairly exhaustive compilation of funding opportunities for new and junior faculty and career awards in most academic disciplines.
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
49
Analyzing the funding agency Analyzing the mission, strategic plan,
investment priorities, and culture of a funding agency provides information key to enhancing proposal competitiveness.
Competitiveness depends on a series of well-informed decision points made throughout the writing of a proposal related to arguing the merit of the research and culminating in a well-integrated document that convinces the reviewers to recommend funding.
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
50
Analyzing the funding agency mission Funding agencies have a clearly defined agenda
and mission. Funded grants are those that best meet that agenda
and advance the mission of the funding agency. If a proposal does not meet an agency's mission, it will not be funded. This is perhaps the most difficult adjustment to be made in proposal development and writing.
Having a "good idea" by itself is not enough. Good ideas have to be clearly connected and integrated with a funding agency’s mission and agenda.
The proposal must fit the mission and strategic plans of the funding agency.
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
51
Analyzing the funding agency mission Funding agencies are not passive funders of
programs, but see themselves as leaders in a national dialogue on scientific issues, and as part of the community defining the national agenda.
A strong proposal allows the funding agency to form a partnership with the submitting institution that will carry out the agency's vision and mission.
The applicant must understand the nature of this partnership and the expectations of the funding agency, both during proposal development and throughout a funded project.
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
52
Analyzing the funding agency
Knowledge about a funding agency helps the applicant make good decisions throughout the entire proposal development and writing process by better understanding the relationship of the research to the broader context of the funding agency’s mission, strategic plan, and research investment priorities.
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
53
Analyzing the funding agency
Who is the audience (e.g., agency, program officers, and reviewers) and what is the best way to address them?
What is a fundable idea and how is it best characterized within the context of the agency research investment priorities?
How are claims of research uniqueness and innovation best supported in the proposal text and reflective of agency strategic research plans?
How does the applicant best communicate his or her passion, excitement, commitment, and capacity to perform the proposed research to review panels?
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
54
Analyzing the funding agency
Mission Culture Language Investment priorities Strategic plan Organizational chart Management Program officers Reports, publications
Leadership speeches Public testimony Review criteria Review process Review panels Project abstracts Current funded projects Funded researchers
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
55
Analyzing the funding agency
It is important to differentiate between and among various funding agencies by mission, strategic plan, investment priorities, culture, etc.
For example, researchers in the social and behavioral sciences and the physical, computational, and biological sciences may have relevant research opportunities at two or more agencies, e.g., NIH, NSF, DOD, EPA, but these agencies are very dissimilar in many ways—see following slide:
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
56
Analyzing the funding agency
Research focus within disciplines
Research that is basic, applied, or applications driven
Research scope and performance time horizon
Exploratory, open-ended research, or targeted to technology development
Multidisciplinary or interdisciplinary
Classified, non-classified Proprietary, non-proprietary Independent research, or
dependent linkages to the agency mission, e.g., health care, education, economic development, defense
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
57
Analyzing the funding agency It is important for the applicant to differentiate
between basic research agencies (e.g., NSF, NIH) and mission-focused agencies (e.g. DOD, NASA, USDA), as well as to differentiate between hypothesis-driven research and need- or applications driven research at the agencies.
Agencies funding basic research would likely share the following characteristics:
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
58
Analyzing the funding agency
Independent agency and management
Independent research vision, mission, and objectives
Award criteria based on intellectual and scientific excellence
Peer panel reviewed, ranked, and awarded by merit
Focus on fundamental or basic research at the “frontiers of science,” innovation, and creation of new knowledge
Open ended, exploratory, long investment horizon
Non-classified, non-proprietary
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
59
Analyzing the funding agency
Alternatively, an analysis of mission-oriented agencies (e.g., DOD, DOE, ED, USDA) would show characteristics related to research and development that will serve the agency’s immediate goals and objectives, as seen on following slide:
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
60
Analyzing the funding agency Scope of work tightly defines research
tasks/deliverables Predominately applied research for meeting near-
term objectives, technology development and transfer, policy goals
Predominately internal review by program officers Awards based on merit, but also on geographic
distribution, political distribution, long term relationship with agency, Legislative, and Executive branch policies
Classified and non-classified research
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
61
Analyzing the funding agency Learn to echo the language and usage of the funding
agency is another factor that may enhance the overall competitiveness of a proposal.
Funding agencies, like most institutions, often develop a unique phraseology to define and describe common, recurrent components of their mission and research agenda, e.g., “broader impacts” or “research and education integration” at NSF.
Learning the language of the funding agency is important for writing the narrative section of a proposal, and helps in framing arguments more clearly and in better communicating them to program managers and reviewers.
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
62
Reading the proposal solicitation The Request for Proposals (RFP) – also
called the Program Announcement (PA), Request for Applications (RFA), or Broad Agency Announcement (BAA) – is one common starting point of the proposal writing process.
Other starting points to the proposal process include investigator-initiated (unsolicited) proposals, or white papers and quad charts common to the defense agencies.
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
63
Reading the proposal solicitation The generic program solicitation or RFP
represents an invitation by a funding agency for applicants to submit requests for funding in research areas of interest to the agency.
It is used continuously throughout proposal development and writing as a reference point to ensure that an evolving proposal narrative fully addresses and accurately reflects the goals and objectives of the funding agency, including review criteria listed in the document.
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
64
Reading the proposal solicitation The RFP contains most of the essential information
the researcher needs in order to develop and write a competitive proposal that is fully responsive to the agency’s funding objectives and review criteria.
The RFP is not a menu or smorgasbord offering the applicant a choice of addressing some research topics but not others, depending on interest, or some review criteria but not others.
The RFP is a non-negotiable listing of performance expectations reflecting the stated goals, objectives, and desired outcomes of the agency.
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
65
Identifying the Contents of the RFP Agency research goals, objectives, and performance
expectations Statement and scope of work Proposal topics to be addressed by the applicant Deliverables or other outcomes Review criteria and process Research plan Key personnel, evaluation, & management Eligibility, due dates, available funding, funding limits,
anticipated number of awards, performance period, proposal formatting requirements, budget and other process requirements, and reference documents.
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
66
Reviewing the RFP The RFP is not a document to skim quickly, read
lightly, or read only once. The RFP defines a very detailed set of research
expectations the applicant must meet in order to be competitive for funding.
It needs to be read and re-read and fully understood, both in very discrete detail and as an integrated whole.
The RFP sets the direction and defines the performance parameters of every aspect of proposal development and writing.
Read it word by word; sentence by sentence; paragraph by paragraph; and page by page.
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
67
Reviewing the RFP Clarify any ambiguity by repeated readings of
the RFP. If these ambiguities cannot be resolved, call
the funding agency and ask for clarification from a program officer.
As much as possible, all ambiguity needs to be resolved prior to the proposal writing process so that ideas and arguments are clearly and tightly aligned with the scope and intent of the funding agency.
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
68
Reviewing the RFP A well-written RFP clearly states the funding agency’s
research objectives in a concise and comprehensive fashion, devoid of wordiness, repetition, and vaguely contradictory re-phasing of program requirements.
However, not all RFPs are clearly written. In some cases, the funding agency itself is unclear about specific research objectives, particularly in more cutting-edge or exploratory research areas.
Therefore, never be timid about calling a program officer for clarification. Timidity is never rewarded in the competitive grant process.
Where there is ambiguity, keep asking questions in order to converge on clarity.
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
69
Role of the RFP in Proposal Organization In addition to presenting information about an
agency’s research agenda and culture, the RFP provides key instructions regarding the presentation and organizational structure of a proposal.
The RFP can be used to develop the structure of the proposal narrative and as a template for developing the sequence and required detail of each section.
Using the RFP as a proposal template during initial proposal outlining helps ensure that every RFP item is fully addressed.
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
70
Role of the RFP in Proposal Organization Major section headings within an RFP often have very
detailed descriptive text defining the objectives of the program (goals, objectives, performance timeline, outcomes, research management, evaluation, etc.) that must be addressed in the proposal narrative.
The detail in each section of the RFP, including the review criteria, can be selectively copied and pasted into the first draft of the proposal itself.
This process provides initial section and subsection headings under which the applicant drafts out preliminary written responses to every requested item in the guidelines, thereby ensuring that the first draft of the proposal fully mirrors the program solicitation requirements in every way.
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
71
Role of the RFP in Proposal Organization Reviewers will expect to see the text in the same
general order as the RFP and the review criteria since that ordering conforms to instructions given to reviewers by the program officers.
Using the RFP as a guide to create a proposal outline also has the advantage of making it easier for reviewers to compare the proposal to the program guidelines and review criteria, without having to search around in a long narrative to find out if each required topic has been addressed.
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
72
Addressing the Review Criteria in the RFP The description of review criteria is an
especially important part of the RFP. A competitive proposal must clearly address
each review criterion, and the proposal should be structured so that these discussions are easy for reviewers to find.
Subject headings, graphics, bullets, and bolded statements using language similar to that used in the RFP can all be used to make the reviewers’ jobs easier as they assess how well the proposal meets review criteria.
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
73
Reading Material Referenced in the RFP If the RFP refers to any publications, reports,
or workshops, it is important to read those materials, analyze how that work has influenced the agency’s vision of the program, and cite those publications in the proposal in a way that illustrates that the applicant has read and absorbed the ideas behind those publications.
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
74
A stepwise process for developing a competitive research proposal
Preparing to write Developing the hypothesis & research plan Preliminary data & research readiness Writing the proposal Post review process Competitive resubmissions Multidisciplinary research & collaborations
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
75
Preparing to write the competitive proposal
Understanding the program guidelines in planning, developing, and writing a competitive proposal.
What should be your relationship with program officers? Developing a sound, testable hypothesis. Asking senior faculty to review, advise & assess
competitiveness of ideas and research, particularly appropriateness to agency research agenda.
What do you need to know about funding agency culture (& sub-cultures), language, mission, strategic plan, & research investment priorities?
What do you need to know about agency review criteria, review process, & review panels?
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
76
Developing the hypothesis & research plan Who is your audience (e.g., agency, program officers and
reviewers) and how do you best address them? What is a fundable idea and how is it best characterized? How are claims of research uniqueness and innovation best
supported in the proposal text? Can research plans be overly ambitious? What are important distinctions to note between mission
focused agencies (NASA, USDA) and basic research agencies (NSF, NIH) in proposing research plans?
Differentiating between hypothesis driven research & application driven at basic research and mission agencies?
How do you best communicate your passion, excitement, commitment, and capacity to perform your research to review panels?
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
77
Preliminary data & research readiness
What evidence needs to be presented to show that the proposed work can be accomplished?
What evidence of institutional support for the research, e.g., facilities, equipment & instrumentation, etc., is important to demonstrate and address in the proposal?
What counts as preliminary data and how much is sufficient?
How do you best map your research directions and interests to funding agency research priorities?
What do you need to know about research currently funded by a particular agency within your research domain, e.g., through reports, publications, journals?
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
78
Writing the proposal Who do you need to impress with your research? How do you tell a good story grounded in good science that excites
the reviewers and program officers? The successful proposal represents an accumulation of marginal
advantage accrued at decision points over a period of weeks or months to ensure the proposal is competitive for funding— What are key decisions points in proposal development? How do you best plan and schedule proposal writing? How do you use program guidelines as a proposal template? Importance of good writing, clear arguments, and reviewer
friendly text, structure, and organization in proposals What are other core competitive characteristics of a successful
proposal needed to complement research merit?
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
79
Post review process
Respecting views of peers Response to reviewer comments Discussion of reviews with program officers Discussion of reviews with senior faculty Reviewing the reviews How do you make an assessment of reviews as a
reliable guide for the next funding cycle?
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
80
Competitive resubmissions
How do you best plan and position for a competitive resubmission?
How do you conduct a reassessment of the intellectual merit and excellence of your research based on reviews?
How to you assess if a research direction should be abandoned, or the research submitted to another agency?
What are strategies for identifying more appropriate research directions and funding opportunities?
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
81
Multidisciplinary & Collaborative Research Initiatives & Faculty Interdisciplinary Groups
Role of centers and institutes in advancing faculty research careers and proposal success;
Role of interdisciplinary faculty research groups in advancing faculty research careers and proposal success;
How do you identify your best opportunities for research advancement along the continuum from single PI, multiple PI, multidisciplinary collaboratives, and center level research funding initiatives?
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
82
Understanding the review process When evaluating a grant application, reviewers will
not only consider the quality of the ideas, but also the extent to which the application addresses the funding agency’s review criteria.
Therefore, it is important to identify these review criteria, understand exactly how the agency defines them, and determine the relative weight (if any) that the agency assigns to each of them.
This information can then be used to develop an application that clearly addresses these criteria and that is therefore much more competitive.
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
83
Identify the review criteria
Most agencies publish their standard review criteria on their web pages and/or in their proposal preparation guides.
Some agency programs will have additional review criteria that the program will delineate in the proposal solicitation; therefore, it is important to read the list of review criteria presented in this document, as well.
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
84
Agency review criteria and review process DHHS (NIH)
Center for Scientific Review http://cms.csr.nih.gov/
NIH review criteria http://www.niaid.nih.gov/ncn/grants/basics/basics_b3.htm
NIH peer review process http://cms.csr.nih.gov/AboutCSR/OverviewofPeerReviewProcess.htm
NIH review groups http://cms.csr.nih.gov/PeerReviewMeetings/CSRIRGDescription/
NIH study section rosters http://www.csr.nih.gov/Committees/rosterindex.asp
NSF
NSF review process, criteria Sec. 3 http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/gpg/nsf04_23/3.jsp
DOD
AFOSR review process, criteria Sec. 2.14 http://www.afosr.af.mil/pdfs/proguide.PDF
ARO review process, criteria Sec. 3 http://www.aro.army.mil/research/arl/arobaa06a.pdf
DARPA review process, criteria http://www.darpa.mil/body/information/proposal.html
ONR review process, criteria Sec. 5 http://www.onr.navy.mil/02/baa/docs/baa_05_024.pdf
USDA
NRI review process, criteria http://www.csrees.usda.gov/funding/nri/pdfs/nri_review_guidelines.pdf
NASA
NASA review process, criteria App. C http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/procurement/nraguidebook/proposer2005.doc
Department of Energy
DOE review process, criteria http://www.sc.doe.gov/grants/process.html
US Department of Education
ED review process, criteria Sec. 5 http://www.ed.gov/fund/grant/about/grantmaking/pt504.html
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
85
Understand the review process The review process varies – sometimes significantly
– from one agency to the next (following slide). The review process may include a peer review,
where outside experts from related fields are invited to review the proposal; an internal review, where agency personnel evaluate the proposal; or a combination of both.
However, most agency review processes share some common features. At most agencies, for instance, an application will first undergo a merit review and, depending upon the results, an administrative review.
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
86
Difference between NSF & NIH This is a fundamental difference between NIH's and NSF's selection
methods--by the end of the NIH review, applications are ranked alongside other entries according to an overall numerical priority score. At NSF however, proposals are not given a numerical rating but are classified according to written "recommendations."
Fred Stollnitz, program director at NSF explains further: "When panels review, [the reviewers] put each proposal into categories such as 'outstanding,' 'good and should be funded,' 'not ready in its present form,' or 'decline.' "
A particularly vocal reviewer could influence the final rating of the panel or where the proposal should be classified, but because there is no absolute score, only opinions are noted in the review analysis report--not actual decisions. An opinionated NIH reviewer on the other hand could affect the scores an application receives and so alter its ranking.
Source: http://nextwave.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/1999/10/06/3
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
87
NSF review panelists NSF panelists convey their opinions and recommendations in a
"panel summary." They compose an overall analysis of review for each proposal that incorporate factors such as the panel summary, subject area, available resources, and the potential impact of the research. They then make final award decisions with the division director. Proposals that receive lower classifications by the panel can sometimes be funded over "higherrated“ research proposals because their overall assessment by the program officer is more favorable.
The budgetary consideration also plays a key role in the decision-making process. "The program officer doesn't just make 'yes' or 'no' decisions," explains Stollnitz. "They have to balance all those proposals that should be funded with the actual funds that are available." Sometimes a proposal classified as 'good and should be funded' submitted by an investigator with minimal existing funds may be given the edge over an 'outstanding‘ proposal submitted by an established and well-funded candidate.
Source: http://nextwave.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/1999/10/06/3
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
88
NSF proposal process and timelines
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
89
NSF example review criterion 1 What is the intellectual merit of the proposed activity? How important is the proposed activity to advancing
knowledge and understanding within its own field or across different fields?
How well qualified is the proposer (individual or team) to conduct the project? (If appropriate, the reviewer will comment on the quality of prior work.)
To what extent does the proposed activity suggest and explore creative and original concepts?
How well conceived and organized is the proposed activity?
Is there sufficient access to resources?
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
90
NIH review criteria
Significance. Does the study address an important problem?
Approach. Are the methods appropriate to the aims of the project?
Innovation. Does the project employ novel concepts or methods?
Investigator. Is the investigator well trained to do the work?
Environment. Does the environment contribute to success?
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
91
Write for the reviewers Reviewers are typically given multiple proposals to review, and
often tight timelines for completion; “While you may be viewing your grant application as the
magnum opus of your life's ambitions and plans--for the next 5 years anyway--a reviewer sees it as one of six to 12 other "magnum opii" projects to evaluate.” (Source:
http://nextwave.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/2003/12/10/6) The proposal needs to clearly present everything the reviewers
will need to read, understand, and evaluate the proposed research project;
Synthesize key concepts and articulate the links between the overarching goal and the specific objectives, between the specific objectives and the hypotheses, between the hypotheses and the approach, between the approach and the expected outcomes, and, finally, between the expected outcomes and the significance and broader impacts of the project.
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
92
Create reviewer-friendly text Divide the proposal into the required sections. Place the sections in the required order. Use parallel structure at both the section and sentence levels. Incorporate logical paragraph breaks. Open paragraphs with clear topic sentences. Discuss important items first. Avoid the use of inflated language. Use declarative sentences. Define potentially unfamiliar terms. Spell out acronyms and abbreviations. Employ appropriate style and usage. Use correct grammar, punctuation, and spelling. Run a spell-check and proofread the application.
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
93
Finding information on funded projects
NSF Award Search Site:http://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/index.jsp
NIH Award Search Site:http://crisp.cit.nih.gov/crisp/crisp_query.generate_screen
Dept. of Ed. Awards Search:
http://wdcrobcolp01.ed.gov/CFAPPS/grantaward/start.cfm USDA Awards Search:http://cris.csrees.usda.gov/
NEH Awards Search: http://www.neh.gov/news/recentawards.html
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
94
Craft of writing
Good writing lies at the core of the competitive proposal.
It is the framework upon which the competitive applicant crafts and structures the arguments, ideas, concepts, goals, performance commitments, and the logical, internal connectedness and balance of the proposal.
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
95
The proposal is the only reality In its final form, a proposal is not unlike a
novel or a movie. It creates its own, self-contained reality.
The proposal contains all the funding agency and review panel will know about your capabilities and your capacity to perform.
With few exceptions, an agency bases its decision to fund or not fund entirely on the proposal and the persuasive reality it creates.
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
96
Good writing is more than mechanics Strong, comprehensive, integrated knowledge base; Organizational clarity (stepwise logic/connections;
sequencing); Structural clarity (integrative logic; logical transitions) Argumentative clarity (reasoning; ordering; synthesis) Descriptive clarity (who, what, how, when, why, &
results) Clear, consistent vision sustained throughout text Comprehensive problem definition; corresponding
innovative solutions Confidence in performance must and excitement for your
ideas must be instilled in reviewers Capacity for synthesis
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
97
Internal consistency & synthesis A competitive proposal must be internally consistent
by language, structure, and argument; all internal ambiguities must be resolved.
The competitiveness of a proposal increases exponentially with the capacity of the author to synthesize information.
Synthesis represents the relational framework and conceptual balance of the proposal. It is the synaptic connections among concepts, ideas, arguments, goals, objectives, and performance.
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
98
Ideas matter (Slogans are not Ideas) Shaping ideas by language is hard work Do not confuse slogans, effusive exuberance,
and clichés with substantive ideas Show the reviewers something new by
developing ideas that are clear, concise, coherent, contextually logical, and insightful
Capitalize on every opportunity you have to define, link, relate, expand, synthesize, connect, or illuminate ideas as you write the narrative.
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
99
Introductory writing tips The abstract, proposal summary, and
introduction are key—that may be all many reviewers read– and it is here you must excite and grab the attention of the reviewers;
Reviewers will assume errors in language and usage will translate into errors in the science;
Don’t be overly ambitious in what you propose, but convey credibility and capacity to perform;
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
100
Introductory writing tips
Sell your proposal to a good scientist but not an expert;
Some review panels may not have an expert in your field, or panels may be blended for multidisciplinary initiatives;
Agencies & reviewers fund compelling, exciting science, not just correct science;
Proposals are not journal articles—proposals must be user friendly and offer a narrative that tells a story that is memorable to reviewers;
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
101
Following agency guidelines Read solicitation and/or proposal guide
carefully for formatting requirements and follow scrupulously Font and font size Page limits Biosketch formats Citation format
Avoids disqualification of your proposal Avoids irritating reviewers
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
102
Set up a schedule to produce proposal
Work back from deadline Allow plenty of time for routing Start budget early
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
103
Make your proposal easy to read Reviewers often have 8 or 10 proposals to
read Use white space, underlining, bold, bullets,
figures, flowcharts to make main points easy to find
Put main idea of sections and paragraphs up front
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
104
Must convince reviewers…
Your proposed project should be funded It’s important and supports the agency mission
and program goals It’s exciting It has a good chance of succeeding
You are the person who should conduct the proposed project Your team is knowledgeable and well-qualified You have the support and resources required
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
105
Proposal sections examples Project Summary Goals/Objectives/Specific Aims Introduction/Overview Background and Significance Approach/Methodology Research Plan Preliminary Data Broader Impacts (NSF) Literature Cited
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
106
Executive summary May be the only thing the reviewer reads Must “grab” the reviewer Should communicate concisely:
Intellectual framework of proposed project The goals and signficance of the proposed project Who will be conducting the project and, briefly, their
qualifications Project outcomes
Must communicate excitement Check for additional requirements
E.g., intellectual merit and broader impacts in NSF proposals Project name, category, etc.
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
107
Goals & specific aims
State specific, measurable goals of your project
Tie to program/agency mission and goals
If hypothesis-based research, state your hypothesis
Discuss expected outcomes
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
108
The succinct proposal introduction
Serves as reviewers’ “road map” to the full text
Opportunity to make most important points up front
States vision, concepts, goals, objectives, outcomes, and deliverables
Briefly tells who you are; what you are going to do; how you are going to do it; who is going to do it; why you are going to do it; and demonstrates your capacity to perform
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
109
Background & literature review Spend some time researching this This section should tie closely to your proposed
research and should tell a story What are the holes in current knowledge that your work will
fill? How does your research extend and advance knowledge
in the field? Do not be dismissive of previous research Be thorough in citing important work but be concise
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
110
Significance
Explain explicitly why proposed research is important Tie to agency and program goals Relate to review criteria
Make this easy to find
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
111
Approach/research plan/methodology Be very clear about how you will accomplish your
stated goals and objectives Include details
What, specifically, will you do when you get the money? Schedules and milestones may be helpful This is especially important if you are a relatively new
researcher Address any potential dead ends, roadblocks, show-
stoppers and how you will deal with them Avoid ambiguous terminology – be very specific!
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
112
Preliminary data
Understand the expectations of the agency and program How much preliminary data is expected? Higher risk research will require more preliminary
data Less experienced researchers will generally need
more preliminary data Preliminary data should strengthen reviewers’
perception of your chance of success
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
113
Collaborations/partnerships Work on these before you start writing Be clear about roles of collaborators and partners Establish split of resources Be sure collaborators and partners get something
out of participating in the project If you need a letter of collaboration, offer to write a
draft for your collaborator to edit Include specifics on what they will do and support they will
provide Explain who the collaborator is and their motivation
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
114
Institutional support
Is cost sharing (matching) required? What type? (Cash, in-kind?) What rules apply?
Are other resources required? Work to set these up early Determine supporting documentation needed
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
115
Connect narrative text to budget Budget categories are defined by the funding agency
Be sure activities discussed in narrative are reflected in budget
Connect narrative text to the budget to ensure appropriate balance and proportion,
If a budget justification section is requested, use it to complement and deepen the narrative detail
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
116
Beware of boiler plate; don’t copy & paste
Boiler plate refers only to the grant application forms required by the funding agency
Thinking of proposal narrative as “boiler plate” will result in a mediocre, disjoint proposal
Begin each proposal as a new effort, not a copy & paste
Be very cautious integrating text inserts Strong proposals clearly reflect a coherent, sustained,
and integrated argument grounded on good ideas
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
117
Outcomes or deliverables
Develop short, hard-hitting lists off-set by bullets or other typographical formats
Relate outcomes to goals and objectives Outcomes should be specific and measurable Timelines and schedules with milestones can
orient reviewers and provide a quick overview of how program components fit together
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
118
Project assessment and evaluation How will you know if you were successful? Describe what will be measured in order to
assess how well project met each of its objectives Who will conduct assessment? Discuss logistics
Formative assessment: conducted throughout project and results fed back to improve project
Summative assessment: final assessment at end of project
Office of Proposal Development 10/21/2005
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M Vice Chancellor for Research, TAMUS
119
Craft of grant writing web sites http://cpmcnet.columbia.edu/research/writing.htm http://nextwave.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/
1999/08/27/1 http://grants.library.wisc.edu/index.html http://www.research.umich.edu/proposals/PWG/
pwgcomplete.html http://www.asru.ilstu.edu/grantwritingseries.htm http://grants.nih.gov/grants/grant_tips.htm http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2004/nsf04016/start.htm http://www.aecom.yu.edu/ogs/Guide/Guide.htm http://www.americanscientist.org/template/AssetDetail/assetid/
23947?fulltext=true&print=yes&print=yes http://www.pitt.edu/~offres/proposal/propwriting/websites.html