Org
aniz
atio
nal B
ehav
ior Group Cohesiveness
Definition(s)• Commonness of attitudes or behavior
• Greater force holding together than driving apart
• Sense of belonging and feelings of morale
• Individuals who “are attracted to each other”
Note that several of these definitions tend to be circular or confuse cause with effect.
Cohesiveness and PerformanceCohesiveness is beneficial if the group’s goals are in concert
with organizational goals ….
Org
aniz
atio
nal B
ehav
ior
Sources of Attraction to a Group/Team
• The goals of the group and the members are compatible and clearly specified
• The group has a charismatic leader• The group has a reputation for accomplishment• The group is small enough to have members’
opinions heard• The members support one another and help each
other overcome obstacles
Org
aniz
atio
nal B
ehav
ior
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GROUP COHESIVENESS & AGREEMENT WITH
ORGANIZATIONAL GOALS
Degree ofgroup
cohesiveness
Low
Performanceprobably oriented
away from organizational goals
Performanceprobably oriented
toward achievementof organizational
goals
HighPerformance
oriented away from organizational goals
Performanceoriented toward achievement of
organizational goals
Low High
Agreement with organizational goals
Org
aniz
atio
nal B
ehav
ior
Steps Managers Can Take ToEnhance the Two Types of
Group Cohesiveness
• Socio-Emotional Cohesivness– Keep the group relatively small
– Strive for a favorable public image to increase the status and prestige of belonging
– Encourage interaction and cooperation
– Emphasize members’ common characteristics and interests
– Point out environmental threats (e.g., competitor’s achievements to rally the group)
Org
aniz
atio
nal B
ehav
ior
Steps Managers Can Take ToEnhance the Two Types of
Group Cohesiveness (continued)
• Instrumental Cohesivness– Regularly update and clarify the group’s goal(s)– Give every group member a vital “piece of the
action”– Channel each group member’s special talents
toward the common goal(s)– Recognize and equitably reinforce every member’s
contributions– Frequently remind group members they need each
other to get the job done
Org
aniz
atio
nal B
ehav
ior
Trust
• How to Build Trust– Communication (keep everyone informed; give
feedback; tell the truth)– Support (be available and approachable)– Respect (delegate; be an active listener)– Fairness (give credit where due; objectively evaluate
performance)– Predictability (be consistent; keep your promises)– Competence (demonstrate good business sense and
professionalism)
Trust: “Reciprocal faith in others’ intentions and behavior.”
Propensity to trust: “A personality trait involving one’s general willingness to trust others.”
Org
aniz
atio
nal B
ehav
ior
Interpersonal Trust Involves a Cognitive Leap
Firsthand knowledgeof other person’sreliability and
integrity
Distrust Trust
Cognitive leap
Faith in the other person’s good intentions
Assumption that other person will behave as desired
Org
aniz
atio
nal B
ehav
ior
Basic Distinctions Among Quality Circles, Virtual Teams and
Self-Managed Teams
Quality Circles Virtual TeamsSelf-Managed
TeamsType of team
Type ofempowerment
Members
AdviceAdvice or project(usually project)
Production,project, or action
ConsultationConsultation,participation,or delegation
Delegation
Production/servicepersonnel
Managers andtechnical specialists
Production/service,technicalspecialists
Org
aniz
atio
nal B
ehav
ior
Basic Distinctions Among Quality Circles, Virtual Teams and Self-Managed Teams (continued)
Quality Circles Virtual TeamsSelf-Managed
TeamsBasis of
membershipRelationship to
organization
Amount of face-to-face
communication
VoluntaryAssigned
(some voluntary)Assigned
Parallel Parallel orintegrated
Integrated
Strictly face-to-face
Periodic to none
Varies, dependingon use of
informationtechnology
Org
aniz
atio
nal B
ehav
ior
Survey Evidence: What Self-Managing Teams Manage
Percentage of Companies Saying Their Self-Managing Teams Perform These Traditional Management Functions by Themselves.
Schedule work assignments 67%Work with outside customers 67Conduct training 59Set production goals/quotas 56Work with suppliers/vendors 44Purchase equipment/services 43Develop budgets 39Do performance appraisals 36Hire co-workers 33Fire co-workers 14
Org
aniz
atio
nal B
ehav
ior
Characteristics of an Effective Team
• Clear purpose
• Informality
• Participation
• Listening
• Civilized disagreement
• Consensus decisions
• Open communication
• Clear roles and work assignments
• Shared leadership
• External relations
• Style diversity
• Self-assessment
Org
aniz
atio
nal B
ehav
ior
Eight Attributes of High-Performance Teams:
• Participative leadership. Creating an interdependency by empowering, freeing up, and serving others
• Shared responsibility. Establishing an environment in which all team members feel as responsible as the manager for the performance of the work unit
• Aligned on purpose. Having a sense of common purpose about why the team exists and the function it serves
• High communication. Creating a climate of trust and open, honest communication
• Future focused. Seeing change as an opportunity for growth• Focused on task. Keeping meetings focused on results• Creative talents. Applying individual talents and creativity• Rapid response. Identifying and acting on opportunities
Org
aniz
atio
nal B
ehav
ior
Why Work Teams Fail
Mistakes typically made by management Teams cannot overcome weak strategies and poor business
practices Hostile environment for teams (command-and-control
culture; competitive/individual reward plans; management resistance)
Teams adopted as a fad, a quick-fix; no long-term commitment
Lessons from one team not transferred to others (limited experimentation with teams)
Vague or conflicting team assignments Inadequate team skills training Poor staffing of teams Lack of trust
Org
aniz
atio
nal B
ehav
ior
Why Work Teams Fail
Problems typically experienced by team members Team tries to do too much too soon Conflict over differences in personal work styles (and/or personality
conflicts) Too much emphasis on results, not enough on team processes and
group dynamics Unanticipated obstacle causes team to give up Resistance to doing things differently Poor interpersonal skills (aggressive rather than assertive
communication, destructive conflict, win-lose negotiation) Poor interpersonal chemistry (loners, dominators, self-appointed
experts do not fit in) Lack of trust
Org
aniz
atio
nal B
ehav
ior
Conflict
Functional conflict serves the organization’s interests while dysfunctional conflict threatens the organization’s interests.
Conflict: “A process in which one party perceives that its interests are being opposed or negatively affected by another party.”
Org
aniz
atio
nal B
ehav
ior
The Relationship between Conflict Intensity and Outcomes
Source: LD Brown, Managing Conflict of Organizational Interfaces, © 1986, Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Inc., Reading, Massachusetts. Figure 1.1 on page 8.
Low ModerateIntensity
High
Too littleconflict
Appropriateconflict
Too muchconflictNegative
Neutral
Positive
Out
com
es
Org
aniz
atio
nal B
ehav
ior
Why do we try to eliminate conflict?
• Ingrained – reinforced at home, school, church• Managers are often evaluated and rewarded for
lack of conflict – part of the culture of the organization
• Avoid disturbing the status quo “If it isn’t broke”… do you break it or move on?
Org
aniz
atio
nal B
ehav
ior
Antecedents of Conflict
• Incompatible personalities or value systems.• Overlapping or unclear job boundaries.• Competition for limited resources.• Interdepartment/intergroup competition.• Differences in perceptions or inaccurate perceptions• Inadequate communication.• Functional differences – line and staff; production &
marketing• Interdependent tasks.• Organizational complexity.
Org
aniz
atio
nal B
ehav
ior
Antecedents of Conflict (continued)
• Unreasonable or unclear policies, standards, or rules.
• Unreasonable deadlines or extreme time pressure.
• Collective decision making.• Decision making by consensus.• Unmet expectations.• Unresolved or suppressed conflict.
Org
aniz
atio
nal B
ehav
ior
Conflict Outcomes
• Agreement: Strive for equitable and fair agreements that last. Search for solutions (Functional consequence)
• Stronger relationships: Build bridges of cohesiveness, goodwill and trust for the future. (Functional consequence)
• Learning: Greater self-awareness and creative problem solving. Change and adapt. (Functional consequence)
• Focus on activity: become task oriented; less concern for individual satisfaction – defeat the enemy. (Dysfunctional consequence)
• Develop loyalty – conformance to norms tends to become important in conflict situations. (Dysfunctional consequence)
Org
aniz
atio
nal B
ehav
ior
Conflict Outcomes
• Distorted perceptions: members may develop stronger opinions of the importance of their unit. Survival of the fittest. (Dysfunctional consequence)
• Negative stereotyping: as conflict rises, stereotypes are reinforced. See fewer distances in your group and greater differences between groups than really exist. (Dysfunctional consequence)
• Decreased communication: decision-making process can be disrupted. (Dysfunctional consequence)
• Also – violence and aggression. (Dysfunctional consequence)
Org
aniz
atio
nal B
ehav
ior
An Updated Contact Model for Minimizing Intergroup Conflict
• Conflict within the group is high• There are negative interactions between groups (or between members of those groups)• Influential third-party gossip about other group is negative
• Work to eliminate specific negative interactions between groups (and members).• Conduct team building to reduce intragroup conflict and prepare employees for cross-functional teamwork.• Encourage personal friendships and good working relationships across groups and departments.• Foster positive attitudes toward members of other groups (empathy, compassion, sympathy).• Avoid or neutralize negative gossip across groups or departments.
Recommended actions:Level of perceived
intergroup conflict tendsto increase when:
Org
aniz
atio
nal B
ehav
ior
Ways to Build Cross-Cultural Relationships
Behavior RankBe a good listener 1Be sensitive to the needs of others 2Be cooperative, rather than overly competitive 2Advocate inclusive (participative) leadership 3Compromise rather than dominate 4Build rapport through conversations 5Be compassionate and understanding 6Avoid conflict by emphasizing harmony 7Nurture others (develop and mentor) 8
Tie
Org
aniz
atio
nal B
ehav
ior
Managing Intergroup Conflict through Resolution
• Problem-solving: reduce tensions through face-to-face meetings of conflicting groups. Identify conflicts and resolve them. Involves identifying all issues, debates, and decision-making.
• Superordinate goals: develop a common set of goals and objectives that can’t be obtained without the cooperation of groups involved.
• Resources: Try to expand resource if the source of conflict is limited resources
• Avoidance: effective only in short-term. Does not resolve or eliminate conflict – eventually it must be faced.
• Smoothing: emphasize the common interest of the conflicting groups and de-emphasize their differences. Manager does not take sides – may only be a short-term solution.
Org
aniz
atio
nal B
ehav
ior
Managing Intergroup Conflict through Resolution
• Compromise: No distinct winner or loser – not an ideal situation for either group.
• Authoritative command: management steps in and expresses desires to groups. Subs usually follow; whether or not they agree with it. Again, short-run solution.
• Altering the human variable: changing human behavior• Altering structural variables: change the formal structure
of the group. Changing members, identify a coordinator.
• Identifying a common enemy: groups in conflict may unit to defeat a common enemy.
Org
aniz
atio
nal B
ehav
ior
Five Conflict-Handling Styles
Integrating Obliging
Dominating Avoiding
Compromising
High Low
High
LowCon
cern
for
Oth
ers
Concern for Self
Source: MA Rahim, “A Strategy for Managing Conflict in Complex Organizations, Human Relations, January 1985, p 84. Used with author’s permission.
Org
aniz
atio
nal B
ehav
ior
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Techniques
• Facilitation: Third party gets disputants to deal directly and constructively with each other.
• Conciliation: Neutral third party acts as communication link between disputants.
• Peer review: Impartial co-workers hear both sides and render decision that may or may not be binding.
• Ombudsman: Respected and trusted member of the organization hears grievances confidentially.
• Mediation: Trained third-party guides disputants toward their own solution.
• Arbitration: Neutral third-party hears both sides in a court-like setting and renders a binding decision.
Org
aniz
atio
nal B
ehav
ior
Group Negotiations
• “A give-and-take decision-making process involving interdependent parties with different preferences.”
• Only successful negotiations have all parties walking away feeling like they have won. Managers can:– Understand the other side. Identify all needs and positions of
the other group(s). Must ask questions. Attempt free exchange of information.
– Know all options: develop, understand, and evaluate options to resolve the conflict. Outcomes may differ if issue is renegotiated.
Org
aniz
atio
nal B
ehav
ior
Questionable/Unethical Tactics in Negotiation
LiesPufferyDeceptionWeakening the
opponentStrengthening one’s
own position
NondisclosureInformation
exploitationChange of mindDistractionMaximization
Org
aniz
atio
nal B
ehav
ior
Negotiation Tactics
• Good cop/bad cop
• Nibble: receiving an additional concession after an agreement has been reached.
• Joint problem solving: what can be done so that both sides win?
• Power of competition: outsource the group (or put the fear of that on the table)
• Splitting the difference: useful if groups are at an impasse
• Low-balling: lower other groups expectations