HWAHAK KONGHAK Vol. 41, No. 2, April, 2003, pp. 224-231
�������� � PAA-grafted PU � ��� �� ��� ��
�������������� ��†
����� �����305-764 � �� �� 220
(2002� 10� 12� ��, 2003� 1� 6� ��)
Effect of Reaction Temperature on the Synthesis of PAA-grafted PU Films through an Oxygen Plasma Treatment
Young-Sun Kim, Oh-Jun Kwon, Eun-Hyung Kim, Sung-Woon Myung and Ho-Suk Choi†
Department of Chemical Engineering, Chungnam National University, 220, Gung-dong, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 305-764, Korea(Received 12 October 2002; accepted 6 January 2003)
� �
Toluene 2,4-diisocyanate(TDI)� polyol� ���� Polyurethane(PU) ��� ���, ����� ��� ��� �
����� ��� peroxide� ��� , peroxide� !"#$ � �%&'($ Polyacrylacid(PAA)-grafted PU ���
��). 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl(DPPH)*($ +,- ����� ./� 01 peroxide2 34 5�6 2.0 nmol/cm2
�7(8, �% &'9�� :; <=>?�2 @A� B���). PAA-grafted PU ��2 ./ CDE ATR-IRF ESCA�
�����, ��1 -COOH2 GHCDE IJG*� ����). K LM2 NF, <=>O1 ����� ��2 PQR6
&' 9�S TSU� :�V TS��(8, �$WX Y 1 Z[R \A�]^6 Ea=39.5 kJ/mol�7). K NF� _ L
MNF� ̀ a CD� NF &'2 \A�]^6 Rb2 cd e MB� fg 2hU� + i j7). k($, ESCA e SEM
� ��� 1 PAA-grafted PU ��2 MB CD NF, PU ./� l1 PAA6 ^IJ($ mno� Cp� [�q7).
Abstract − Polyurethane (PU) films were synthesized from toluene 2,4-diisocyanate (TDI) and polyol. After introducing
peroxides on the PU films through oxygen plasma treatment, PAA-grafted PU films were synthesized through the solution
reaction of acrylic acid monomer with peroxides which are used as initiators. The maximum concentration of peroxides
obtained by 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) method was 2.0 nmol/cm2 and we investigated the effect of reaction tem-
perature on the change of grafting degree. The surface properties of the surface-modified PU films were characterized by the
Attenuated Total Reflection-Fourier Transformed Infrared (ATR-FTIR) and Electron Spectroscopy for Chemical Analysis
(ESCA). We measured the quantity of introduced -COOH groups using back-titration method. As results of this study, the
amount of PAA grafted on PU film was increased with increasing reaction temperature and the apparent activation energy of this reac-
tion was 39.5 kJ/mol. After comparing this result with other previous results, we could conclude that the activation energy of this
reaction strongly depended on the type and the structure of substrate materials. Finally, since the dried PAA-grafted PU film
showed locally-agglomerated non-uniform structure as the result of observations through ESCA and SEM, the PAA chain
grafted on PU film certainly had locally different lengths due to the complex reaction paths.
Key words: Oxygen Plasma, Modification, Polyurethane, Activation Energy
1. � �
������ �� �� �� ���� �� ������
�� �� �� !" #$ %&� '( )" *+,�- .�
/�0� '�[1]. 123 !" 4� �5�6$ 7, 89: ;<�3
!��% =(3� 7>� �2 >?@ �A�� B�C �����
DE� FGHI DE J�@ ���� �2 KL�@ MN�OP Q
R% .� ST0U�[2-5]. V �� ��� WX�M DE� �L
KL�@ MN�� ��L, !" #, YZ� [\ ]$ ^M_ `
� '�[6-11]. )D * DE 1abc d# efg-P e/h[12-18],
FGHI[17-19], �ih[20], j-3 ek[21] ]$ /��� DE� �
�� d#l mn? o`$ ` � 'P pq/�r ]$ MNnsP e
f� t� /�0� '�. �2 ef� 3%&- �u` � 'Pv, w
x yn z/fg- ���WX{ Y|"@ yn� z/�� ���W
X@ m��P ef��, }xP kz/ efg- S+<~ �P ��
�B��C G�8$ !n� �� Y|"{ ���� 1abc ns
P ���, � �xP +� �P �� �W ��C �:� �P†To whom correspondence should be addressed.E-mail: [email protected]
224
������� � �� � 225
opy
hydroperoxide@ !n� ��, �� �� �M�C �:�$ �
�� �� Y|"{ ���� 1ab� nsP ef� '�[22, 23].
��C �� DEJ� ef�$ ���� ���l DE� �L
KL�@ MN�g-� �� ���l �� , Rz * ��$ �&
�- DEl h� � �� �L$ �� %&� 'P ��Wl
m�� %L� ��. � QRl ¡ * ¢ � ;W n£0� 'P ¤
¥ ¦ �����l DE� �L KL�@ MN�g-� �����
§l Rz * ,¨* ©� ª=� �� �L* ���«L$
¬��� B���. �@ B � QR-�, ��® TDI-¬¯ �
����$ #�� °±$ ?z��, 1 DE� �� FGHI@ �
��� G�8$ ²n� ³�, ́ �µ�g- DE 1ab��� ��
���l DE� ¶·¸¹ KL��$ MN�6�, ����� DE�
´�µ� 1ab�� ) �M, º» n¼, ́ �µ� ½Ml ¾¿$ z
/�6�.
2. � �
2-1. �� ��
� ¹À� /�Á FGHI º» ,ÂP �� Fig. 1� Mn�6�. º
»�P rf-plasma º»�-�, ÃÄ�% 13.56 MHz, 4¬ ÅÆ� rotary
pump@ ���� S+ <~@ �&�6�, bell-jar ²g- Ç�Á º»
�(model EPPS 2000, PLASMART Inc.)% /�0U�. º»� 4¬l
ÅÆ� S+È�&(model 801, Varian)- ÉÊ�6�, �N �"l �|�
Mass Flow Controller(MFC, Brooks, Japan, Model 5850E)@ ����
º»� 4¬l ÅÆ$ zË�6�. FGHI �!� º»� 4¬l �
ÌÍg- ÎÈ Ï*�6�.
2-2. �� ��
� QR�C /� ��®, �Ð, ¹�Ñ, ÒÓÔ���n´Õ�c(TDI)
P (Ã)�Ö¦×�Ø2&�C ?+�6�, acrylic acid(AA) Y|"P =
� Junsei Chemical Co., ��®� (Ã)Ù�:Ú, Sodium HydroxideP
Aldrich(99.99%)�C RN�� /��6�.
2-3. ��� � ��
ÛÜ Polyol(100 g) TDI@ º»nÝ ����� °±$ Þ�U�,
+�% ßYÁ �� �B��C º»� �Ó(��. 24n¼ degas@
polyol@ à���, silicon(1.2 g), catalyst(0.39 g)@ á#�� 500 rpmg
- 5�¼ �º�6�. TDI@ â%�� k� 2,000 rpmg- �ºãM@
®��, TDI(46.34 g)@ â%�� ä� n¼� åká# � º»� å
X0M_ �6�. �ºæ$ ���çè °± B� éç��6�, ê 24
n¼ ³, éç�Á ��� °±$ ë$ � 'U�.
2-4. ������ �� � ���� ����
3×3 cm2 ��l ìF$ nX�Ê) B� �Ê��, º»� 4¬@ S
+g- Þ�� B�C -¯� íb@ îy�6�. �|zË�(MFC)@
���� =Ê|l ��@ ÃN�EC, º»� 4¬l ÅÆ$ zË�6
�. ���Cl ÅÆ� 250 mTorr- �Ê ³, 10� %| ��@ ÃN
��, �� FGHI@ 30¼ �!nÝ ����� °± DE$ J�
�6�. FGHI �!� º»� 4¬l �ÌÍg-¬¯ ïÊM@ Ï*
�6�. J� �³�P ð��P G�8l ?�@ B�C S+$ 10
�¼ ñ(à ³, òó %ç* ´·ô$ 20�¼ ÃN�6�. FGHI
J� ìF$ +� d� 5�¼ õönÝ hydroperoxide% !�M_ º
»n÷�. ø� Ê�S ½Ml ́ �µ� �æ$ ��- purgensù, ì
F$ �æ d� úN�� ´�µ�l DE 1abc d#$ ¹n�6
�. º» ³l nXP û�ü ýu�- 2þ �ÿ��, ethanol$ �Ð-
/��� soxhlet extractor�C 24n¼ %| ð��P homopolymer@
?��6�.
2-5. Grafting Degree(GD) �
����� °± B� �W�P -COOHl Ê| ��� o Êef$
���6�. NaOH/ethanol �æ(0.01 mol)$ Þ��, °±$ �� <~
�C 80oC�C 1n¼ yï º»$ n÷�. FGç�l �M@ <� <
~- �Q ��n� ³�, phenolphtalein$ &nêg- � e� ÃN�
�, HCl/water(0.01 ml)- d: Ê$ �6�. d: Êl A@ ��
5� ��� YB E � 1ab�Á �$ ���6�.
Grafting Degree(µg/cm2)=[(VNaOHCNaOH−VHClCHCl)103 MAA]/S (1)
��C, SP 1ab�Á °±l E �ù, VP /�Á NaOH{ HCll
¬, MAAP ´�µ�l ��|$ 3���[21].
2-6. !"# PU$ %& '(
2-6-1. Attenuated Total Reflection Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectrosc
(ATR-FTIR)
Digilab FTS-165 FT-IR Spectrometer- DE m�Á °± Bl carboxyl
group$ ���Pv /��6�.
2-6-2. Contact Angle
����� °±l DE� ��* -COOH@ %&� 'g�- �
��C �g-l �:@ ÉÊ�6�. WX DEl � ÿM*
�� ) ���$ Erma contact angle meter(Model G-1)@ ���C
����� °± DE� =Ê ¼�g- =Ê �(10µl)l ��@
�(û�� 17 °±l DE �e�� �ÓP �M@ ÉÊ�6�.
2-6-3. Electron Spectroscopy for Chemical Analysis(ESCA)
ESCALAB MK �, V.G. Scientific LTD, East Grinstead UK(Mg Ka
1,253 eV, 90o)@ ���� �"DE �El R��3 1l :ÚA
#<~@ Ê�Ê| ���6�.
2-6-4. Scanning Electron Microscope(SEM)
k��$ ��� Ã/` 7 �!�P 2ß k�@ ���� ��l D
E$ K��6�.
3. �� �
3-1. Grafting Degree(GD)$ )*
����� °±$ �� FGHI@ ©�� G�8$ MN�EFig. 1. Reactor for plasma treatment.
HWAHAK KONGHAK Vol. 41, No. 2, April, 2003
226 �������������������
diperoxide(R-O-O-R){ hydroperoxide(R-O-O-H)% ²Á�. =Ê �M �
<l <~�C ´�µ�g- 1abc º»$ �g- hydroperoxide%
��0� Y|"{ ���E 1abc mnº»� =(��. Fig. 2P
º» Êl m�M@ ��Ã� '�.
Fig. 3� 1ab� º» �M� �G ����� DE� MNÁ ��
´�µ�l �l �:@ ��Ã� '�. 20-90oC�C ÉÊ$ �6�,
60 oC �&P GD�� z�� < �&Þ 80oC ¬¯P !� ý%@
3�4P �$ " � '�. 70oC �<�CP ´�µ�l �æ <�C
homopolymer�� K�0UPv, ��� 70oC �<�Cl !� GD
ý%l �** �g- /XÁ�. Soxhlet #ö$ © homopolymer�
$ ?��OP õÆ�M òR�� ���C ²Á homopolymer��
DE 1ab�Á ���� C- $%C & ?�0& '(�. �� Q
R�CP �ædl homo polyacrylic acid!$ e&�� B�C Mohr salt
[14, 21, 24], ):*[22], +:R�[24] ]l �ã +$ /��6�. �
QR�CP �� �ã +$ /��&P '(&Þ 60oC ���CP
homopolymer% �Kg- R�` ÊM- ²0& '(g�- Soxhlet
#ö$ ©�� ²,$ &M -·P homopolymer�� .�/ �ÊÁ
�g- ¼Ã�� � �B�Cl ¹ÀAÞ$ /��� �Ml ¾¿$
º» ãM0 g- Ç1��� �6�. ��´�µ�l DE1ab�
º»� ����� DEl pq/�rl ��{ �-¬¯l 1ab�
mn, kÄ � 2XY�- 33 � 'Pv, GD@ AÊ�P Ã4Y�P
kÄY�- %Ê��, º»l mnP DE� ²Á pq/�r�CÞ
nîÁ�� %Ê�6�. �2 %Êg-¬¯ Arrhenius f5$ �·P
1ß� -6$ ÇÊ�6�. Ghosi[25] ]� dicumyl peroxide@ mn?
- /� ´�µ�l 1abc +d#�C � º»� 1ß º»7$ Ï
*�6�. 8, pq/�r ²$ B FGHI º»z9$ =Ê�È
�&�g-� ����� DE� ²Á pq/�rl ¨:M(θ)P -
; ìF�C y=��� ¼Ã�6�. �kl QR�C DPPH fg- É
Ê A[26], pq/�rl ¨:MP 100 W, 250 mTorr, 30 secl F
GHI º» z9��C 2 nmol/cm27$ < � 'U�.
(2)
� 5$ 0¬¯ º»n¼ tr�& ���, � 5l ��� log@ =�
E ´al 5$ �M` � '�.
(3)
� ¹À�C 30%́ �µ� �æ 100 ml d�P 0.42 moll ´�µ�
� '�, 60oC�C 100µg/cm2l GD@ %Ê` 7, 9 cm2l ìF� M
N> � 'P ?)l ´�µ� ½MP 12.5µmol -�, xl �� )�
4.5×10−5 ÊM% Á�. �GC, � �ædl ́ �µ� ½M(CAA0)� �
�� 1ab�Á ´�µ� ½M(CG)P Ð� î� 7>�, x→0G� `
� '�, �7, ln(1−x)=−x− x2− x3...≈−x- @/` � '�. �, xP
GD� �A��- 5 (3)� ¼Y/ ´a{ B� ln(GD)P Ë)�Ml
o�� �A�P �g- @/` � '�.
ln(GD) ≈ ln(const×k0trθ)− (4)
V, � º»� |l ´�µ� �æ d� DE� pq/�r% M
NÁ ����� °±$ ú��� 1ab� º»$ n� ���-, º
»�l |MN$ %Ê�� 0ß º»g- ¼Ã` �M '�. � C�
5 (2)P �� B� D � '�.
(5)
� 5$ 0¬¯ º»n¼ tr�& ���, � 5l ��� log@ =�E,
(6)
� 0(, AE 5 (4){ B� A@ BÈ Á�. �@ 7ll nß º»
g- =º:�� �E, º» ãM5�
(7)
� 0ù, � 5$ 0¬¯ º»n¼ tr�& ��� Ê��E,
(8)
� 0ù, FVl GH ï$ km�E, [(1−x)1−n−1]=−(1−n)x+O(x2)��
-, x→0 = 7, [(1−x)1−n−1]≈−(1−n)x- @/` � '(, ?2 g-
rdCAA
dt------------– kθCAA k0e
Ea RT⁄– θCAA= = =
1 x–( )ln–[ ]ln 1CG
CAA0
-----------– ln– 1
CAA
CAA0
-----------– ln–ln=ln=
= k0trθ( )ln EaRT-------–
12--- 1
3---
EaRT-------
rdCAA
dt------------ kθCAA0 k0e Ea RT⁄– θCAA0= =–=
xlnCG
CAA0
----------- ln k0trθ( )ln Ea
RT-------–= =
rdCAA
dt---------------– kθCAA
n k0e Ea RT⁄– θCAAn= = =
CAA01 n–
1 n–----------- 1 x–( )1 n– 1–[ ]–
CAA01 n–
1 n–----------- 1
CG
CAA0
-----------– 1 n–
1– k0trθe Ea RT⁄–= =
Fig. 2. Schematic diagram of graft copolymerization on a PU surface.
Fig. 3. Effect of reaction temperature on the grafting of AA onto PU film(plasma treatment; 100w, 250 mTorr, 30 s, grafting; 30%, 1.5 h).
���� �41� �2� 2003� 4�
������� � �� � 227
5 (4){ B� @/5$ �M` � '�. 12�-, � ¹À B�
|l AA�æ d� î� mn? °±$ ú� C��P º»ß��
<KI� 5 (4)P J�È Á�.
�GC, 5 (4)@ �� Arrhenius plot(Fig. 4)g-¬¯ KG ó:
�L&@ R�6�. �7, �æ dl homopolymerl �ÿ� ò.�
C�@ �O��, /�Á ¹À�XP homopolymer% K�0& '�
60 oC ��l �XÞ$ /��6�. B�C �� KG ó:�L&
P d#º»l mn, kÄ, 2X Y�@ ©#�� ��Á �g- =2l
M�� ó:�L&G� ` � '�. Table 1�CP �k QR���
�/ efg- R M�� ó:�L& ��$ ���� �(�.
��A � %& Nø-ü /¹�$ K�` � 'U�. wx- ´�µ
� d#º»l ó:�L&P �� ���l 2u� �G �� �$
^� 'U�. Polypropylene(PP){ Polyethylene(PE){ B� ��®�Ol
C��P )"- 85-105 kJ/moll �� �$ ��ÃP ºE� Thermoplastic
Elastomer(TE), PU 1�� Ethylene Vinyl Acetate(EVA) d =¬l C��
P 30-40 kJ/mol ÊMl P� �$ ��ÃU�. Ghosi[25] ]� PE@ �
�- AA@ 1abc d#nsEC DSC@ ���� º»� �� ÔQ
l �:@ ÉÊ�� ó:�L&@ R A, RO 170 kJ/moll ó
:�L&@ ëU�. 123, � ó:�L&�P PEDE�Cl 1a
bc d#º» SÞ ´TG �æ d�Cl homo polymerizationM U
��� '�. �GC, ��®�O$ �� ���- /�` C��P º
»� ���& '�� �1��. ºE�, TE{ PUl C��P ó:
�L&@ P#(ÃP +© * �*� '�� VWI�. EVAl C�@
XY�E, VAl �|� 9%�C 18%- ý%` 7, ó:�L&P 81.8
�C 27.5- �È Z��6�. �P VA% AAl 1ab�$ M{ÃP
o`$ �P �g- " � '�. �� � 2u ���l +©¨$ z/
A, ��l +© * �[� -\ ¶·¸¹�@ ^� '�P ��
�. EVA +d#"l C��, EVAdl ´�×�c�P �]^� ��
� �s�� I ä� _/`l o`$ �ù, �GC =º g- VA
l �|� .$�_ ���l AÊ� P´&P �g- ��0U�
[16]. �-¬¯ ´�µ�l DE d# º» n ������ 'P ¶·
¸¹�P k" º»l ó:�L&@ PÈ �ÃP o`, 8, �Ð{ B
� o`$ �P �g- /XÁ�. PP3 PEl C��P �:��l �
��� 7>� pq/�r{ º»�� B�C �@�P ´�µ� -õ
a@ e��P ºE� �Cl � ����l C��P ��� /` d
l COO-�% ´�µ�$ b´�c ´�µ�l º»$ dÈ Á�. \
�x- Mass Flow Index(MFI)l ¾¿g-� Table 1�C �P e{ B
� EVA@ ��- /��6$ C�, B� VA�|$ ^� '&Þ MFI
% C- �� EVA�� e/hz/@ ©�� ´�µ�$ 1abc d
#n� A, MFI% ý%�� �GC ó:�L&M �GC ý%�P
�g- ��0U�. )ml C�, MFIl ý%P ���l mobilityl ý
%@ lø��- <5 g- " 7, º»l ý%, 8, ó:�L&l
Z�@ fÉ` � '�. 123, Ringrose{ Kronfli[16]% & �J
g � ���/`�l mobilityl ý%��P ¤/O P� MFIl EVA
% ^È0P Rz * ,¨(bulkiness)g- *�� º»l ó:�L&
% P´&P �g- /XÁ�.
Fig. 5P Arrhenius plotl A R�S ó:�L& Ea=39.5 kJ/mol
Fig. 4. Arrhenius plot of the grafting reaction of AA onto polymer sur-face.
Table 1. The apparent activation energy of grafting reaction in AA solution
Materials Treatment method AA-Reaction condition Activation energy(kJ/mol) Ref.
PP Fabricγ-ray irradiation
(40 kGy)
in N2 30%AA, no additive 95.6
22in Air 30%AA, no additive 104.8in N2 30%AA, 0.2M-H2SO4/2.5 mM-FeSO4 54.3in Air 30%AA, 0.2M-H2SO4/2.5 mM-FeSO4 57.2
TE γ-ray irradiation(25-100 kGy) 20%AA, 0.11 mM-Mohr’s salt 30.1 14
EVA
9/3
γ-ray irradiation(0-50 kGy) 25%AA, 5.6 d/dm3 FeSO4
81.8
1618/2 27.518/35 38.418/150 59.3
Polyethylene corona discharge 20%AA, 0.03 mM-Mohr’s salt 85.9 21Polyurethane O2-plasma 30%AA, no additive 39.5 This study
Fig. 5. Comparison of the value predicted from model with experimen-tal data.
HWAHAK KONGHAK Vol. 41, No. 2, April, 2003
228 �������������������
$ /��� fÉ -6 ¹ÀA@ �� 1W��. 1W�C �
P e{ B� 70oC���CP ¹ÀA{ -6� & =Â�6&Þ,
70 oC �<�CP h ß�@ ��ÃU�. �P 1ab� º»�C ²
Á ��´�µ�l i /` homopolymerl jklg- *��
Soxhlet #ö�M òR�� ø�ÿÁ homopolymer% m�S �g- /
XÁ�. �k QR�C ë(S pq/�r :M 2 nmol/cm2$ DEl
ó¨l :M- %Ê��, � ó¨�C -\ + g- mnº»�
ST0U�� %Ê�E, �� 5g-¬¯ 1abcÁ ��´�µ�l
n�(LPAA)@ #Ê` � '�. �7, ��´�µ�l C-C A#n�@
0.154 nm- ¼Ã�6�.
(9)
5 (9)�C ��S �Jg �Q/M PAAl C��P LPAAP 3õÂ
��C GD� �l B� �$ 3�4U�. �GC, 60oCl C��P
ê 78 nml oª/`n�@ ��à�� ` � '�. �P DE ó¨
� -\ º»p�P %Êg- ��Á ���- ¹?-P ��� mq
i /`� DE� ²0U$ �g- /XÁ�. Table 2�CP º» �
M �:� �� 1abc PAA /`n�l �:@ ¹À � -6 fÉ
Â@ �� A��. �� A 70oC{ 80oC /��C homopolymer
l !� ²$ fÉ` � 'Pv �M ý%� �G �æ d homopolymer
l !� ý%0( ø�ÿ homopolymer% r´'( ¹ÀÂ{ �0Â
l ß�@ ��ÃP �g- /XÁ�. 1ab� º» n� �����
DE� MNÁ -O-O-H�C -O-O- A#� ��� 0(C -O· G�8
·O-H% ²� Á�. 1ab�$ ³� º»� 4¬ �æl ̈ M@ �E
ÎÈ < � 's� 80oC �<l º» z9��CP homopolymer% �
| !0P �$ Ï*�6�. ��� Á -O· G�8� 1ab�l m
n? o`$ �� ����� DE� -COOH KL�l MN� ���
�, ·O-HP ́ �µ� º»�� homo polymerization$ =g��� <
Ot '�[16].
3-2. ATR-FTIR '(
����� °±� MNÁ AAl ¶·¸¹�l IR çucg� ��
��l [�{ 1,700 cm−1 ¬@�C vÂ( 3�3�- R��� w�
�. �GC ¶·¸n�l MN$ Ï*�� B� ´�µ�� 1abc
Á ����� °±$ NaOH ��æ� n( -COOH@ -COONa-
ex( ÃU�. øJ�, �� FGHI J�, PU-COONa °±l ATR-
FTIR çucg$ Fig. 6� 3�4U�. ¶·¸¹ 1y$ %&� 'P �
���� °±� ¶·¸¹ 1y� IP ìF ;Ü ß�@ ��&
P '&Þ 1,680 cm−1�C � �:-¬¯ ¶·¸¹1yl ¶·�z1
y�C �* �- KL� MN$ Ï*` � '�.
3-3. +,- '(
����� °± DE� �$ ÉÊ�6�. nX) B� ����
� ìF$ ®O {� =Ê |(10µl)l ��@ �(û�� |DE
�e�� �ÓP ���$ Erma contact angle meter(Model G-1)@
���C ÉÊ�6�. � nXI� 5��< BÂ@ ex(C ÉÊ��
1 oª�$ �l ���g- /��6�, Fig. 7� Mn�6�.
20oC�C 1ab�Á °±l ���� 57o$ 3�4� '�, º»�
M� �G ���� Z��P �$ �}�6�. 90oC�CP 30o� %
�ü ���$ 3�4� 'Pv, �P DE� graftÁ PAAl \�% ý
%�� �GC 9zÁ PAA% �$ [��g-� P� ���$ ��
ÃP �g- /XÁ�.
3-4. ESCA '(
øJ�Á °± FGHI J�, ´�µ� 1ab�Á ìFl ESCA
carbon 1C core level scan spectra@ 3�4� '�. 284.4, 286, 287.6,
288.7 eVP �� C-C, C-O, C=O, COOl C1s A#�L&@ 3���.
C1sl � E $ ����, ��l %@ Table 3� 3�4U�.
øJ�Á °±�CP PU-COOH�C 286 eVl COOl �E �
3.7%@ 3�4� 'P ºE� FGHI J�{ 1ab�Á ìF�
288.7 eV�C 3.9{ 10.9l COO% )| MNÁ �$ < � 'U�.
LPAAGD µg cm2⁄[ ]
M.WAA µg µmol⁄[ ]----------------------------------------------
1000 nmolµmol⁄[ ]2.0 nmol cm2⁄[ ]
----------------------------------------------×=
0.154× nm GD nm≈
Table 2. Change of the average length of PAA grafted with respect to temperature
Temperature, oC 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
(experiment), nm 12.6 19.4 38.9 56.2 77.8 141 572 739(model), nm 11.8 20.1 33.2 53.1 82.6 125.3 185.5 268.8
Fig. 6. ATR-FTIR spectra of (a) PU-AA, (b) Plasma-treated PU, (c)Untreated PU.
Fig. 7. Effect of reaction temperature on the contact angle to water(plasma treatment; 100 W, 250 mTorr, 30 s, grafting; 30%, 1.5 h).
���� �41� �2� 2003� 4�
������� � �� � 229
V, º» �M� �� 1ab�l ¾¿$ <´�� B�C :Ú ��
��$ A Table 4@ ë$ � 'U�.
º» �Ml < � �GC GD� ~�l ¿<$ Ï*�6�,
ESCA@ �� ���$ ©�C ����l ��� ¨ß ý%�P
�$ <´4U�. 50 60oC� M��6$ 7P ý% �� �& '(
�, �³-P ���� ��� !�/ ý%�P �$ < � '�. �{
P º)- Nl �|� 60oC�³ ¬¯P !�/ Z��È Á�. �P
grafted-PAAl \�% ý%�� �G PU DEl Nl �|� �(rP
�$ º¾ ���. V � �X d N peakl ��@ ���E, PU
°± Bl 9zÁ grafted-PAAl \�@ ��` � '�. �� ËßP
¹�Ñ DE� graftÁ PEOl 9z \�@ �� Sofia ]l �>[27]
$ ���6�. 8,
d =λ�ln(I0/I) (10)
��C, IP ìF °±l graftÁ �g-¬¯ ë� N peakl ���ù, I0P øJ� PU °±l N peakl ���ù, dP 9zÁ PAA�l \�
@ � �. ��C, λP attenuation length@ ��ù �� 5g- ��Á�.
λ(Å)=9.0+0.02�KE(eV) (11)
��C, KEP Ík�l üy�L&�ù, � QR�CP X-ray �g-
Mg@ /��6g�- �� 5g- ��Á�.
KE(eV)=1253.6−BE (12)
BEP A#�L&-� Nl C��P 399.9 eV% Á�. ��l AP
Fig. 8� Mn�6Pv, �C o Êfg- �� GD�g-¬¯ �ö
Á /`l n�{ �� Mn�6�. 1W�C �P e{ B� ESCA É
Êg- ��Á 9zÁ PAA�l \�P )� g- GD- �öÁ /`
l n�{ h² * K�% '�$ < � '�. ESCA ÉÊl BÂ�
�GC �P ìFl Rz� �GC Al ÊÏ� �(&&Þ ¹?
/`l n�{ ��� 9z0U$ C��l )� * \�@ Ê| g
- �ö�g-� PU °± B� grafted-PAAl Rz@ fÉ` � 'P
YC- /� %L��G� !�Á�. 8, 9zÁ \�% grafted-PAAl
n�� ��� <�/ îÈ �ö0UPv �P 9zÊ�C PU /`
/�- grafted-PAA% �ú0( 3�� A- /XÁ�. ¹? PU °
±� ��l AÊRz- ��Á �ã£P �� �� K¨�C "
7, PU /`- �Ó(S Rʲ òª= DE��- 9zÁ °±l C
��P ����� �t3%ù �+¼� grafted-PAA/`�� �ú�
È 0�G /XÁ�.
3-5. SEM '(
k��$ �� DEl SEM /S$ Fig. 9� Mn�6�. Fig. 9l
(a)P J��& '� ����� °±l DE$ 3�4�, (b)P Y|"
Table 3. Peak area of ESCA C1s core level spectra of PU and surface-modified PU; (a) Untreated PU, (b) Plasma-treated PU, (c) PU-AA
Sample C-C C-O C=O COO
a 49.8 40.7 5.8 3.7b 42.6 47.0 6.5 3.9c 60.7 25.3 3.1 10.90
Table 4. Chemical composition of surface-modified PU films calculatedfrom ESCA spectra
T(oC)Atomic percent(%)
C O N
20 72.98 22.02 5.0030 71.58 23.41 5.0140 71.49 23.43 5.0850 71.48 23.50 5.0260 70.60 24.70 4.7070 72.13 25.89 1.9880 72.67 25.18 1.1590 70.14 29.05 0.81
Fig. 8. Grafted polymer length vs. dry film thickness.
Fig. 9. Scanning electron microscopy picutres of surface for the PU film;(a) no treatment PU film, (b) oxygen plasma+grafting PU film(30%, 1.5 h, 80oC).
HWAHAK KONGHAK Vol. 41, No. 2, April, 2003
230 �������������������
of
th
nd
re-
,
-
is-
riza-
is-
,
nd
a-
d-
h
er
ane
id
la-
on-
fla-
a
of
ies
c
ural
½M 30%, J�n¼ 1.5 h, º»�M 80oCl z9��C 1ab� ì
Fl DE$ ��� '�. (a)� ��C (b)P �� ñ�� .� �
U�P �$ < � '�. ��� ��3 k�� l�C ��� DE
� � �$ 3�4� (a)�P IP �Ì ¬��� (b)�P �}� 0U
�. �C ESCA ��$ ©�� fÉ�6s� PU DE� graftÁ PAA
P i /`�&Þ 9z�6$ C��P ��0EC ¬� g- ��'
�$ < � '�. Konig ][28]� poly-(tetrafluoroethylene)(PTFE) DE
� 70 nml 1ab�Á ´�µ�$ Ï*�6�.
4. � �
� QR�CP polyol TDI-¬¯ �����$ #�� Þ; °
± DE� ��FGHI@ ���� G�8$ MN��, PAA graft
copolymerization$ ���� ����� °± DE� KL�@ +
g- MN�6�. �� FGHI J�l ? z9� �k ¹À�C
DPPH method- Ï* öÆ 100 watt, ÅÆ 250 mTorr, z/n¼ 30 s
@ /��6�, � z9�C %, .� 2 nmol/cm2l peroxide% !
0U�. B{ B� ? z9�C ! peroxide@ º» mn?- /
��� ´�µ�g- 1abc d# A 70oC, 90oCl GD��
250µg/cm2, 800µg/cm2�$ ëU�. �Ml ý%� �G GD�� ý%
�P �$ ¹À$ ©�C <´4U�, 1 A � º»l M�� ó
:�L&P 39.5 kJ/mol�ù, º»l ó:�L&P �Wl 2u � R
z� �GC ¾¿$ �P �$ < � 'U�. ATR-FTIR �� A Ê
g- ²Á COO-�@ Ï*` � 'Ugù, º»�M� �� ��
�l Z�P GDl < )»K�@ ��ÃU�. ESCA ��l A
Ê g- COO-�l ý%@ Ï*�6�, ́ �2 9zÁ PAAl � \
�@ �ö` � 'U�. � A{ SEM /S �� A@ ���� "
7, grafted-PAAP 9zn PU °± B�C &o g- ��C �U�
$ < � 'U�.
�
� QRP ����¬ !���QR�l �Ê!���/�l &�g
- �T0U� �� Z/@ rJT�. ́ �2, ESCA N(1s) peak-¬¯
9zÁ PAA� \���$ M{Ã� MITl &; �� Z/l ��
$ k#T�.
���
BE : Binding energy
CAA : Concentration of the acrylic acid
CAA0 : Concentration of the initial acrylic acid
CG : Concentration of the grafted acrylic acid
CHCl : Concentration of HCl
CNaOH : Concentration of NaOH
Ea : Activation energy
GD : Grafting degree [µg/cm2]
k : Rate constant, per unit time
k0 : Pre-exponential factor
KE : Kinetic energy
LPAA : Grafted polymer length of PAA [nm]
M.AA : Molecular weight of acrylic acid [µg/mol]
S : Area of the film
t : Time
tr : Reaction time
VNaOH : Volume of NaOH
VHCl : Volume of HCl
��./ 01
λ : Attenuation length [Å]
θ : Point density
���
1. Lamba, N. M. K., Woodhouse, K. A. and Cooper, S. L., Polyure-
thanes in Biomedical Applications, CRC press, Boca Raton(1998).
2. Kim, E. J., Kang, I.-K., Jang, M. K. and Park, Y. B., “Preparation
Insulin-Immobilized Polyurethanes and Their Interaction wi
Human Fibroblasts,” Biomaterials, 19, 239-249(1998).
3. Kang, I.-K., Baek, D. K., Lee, Y. M. and Sung, Y. K., “Synthesis a
Surface Characterization of Heparin-Immobilized Polyetheru
thanes,” J. of Polymer Science: Part A: Polymer Chemistry, 36,
2331-2338(1998).
4. Kang, I.-K., Kwon, O. H., Kim, M. K., Lee, Y. M. and Sung, Y. K.
“ In vitro Blood Compatibility of Functional Group-Grafted and Hep
arin-Immobilized Polyurethanes Prepared by Plasma Glow D
charge,” Biomaterials, 18, 1099-1107(1997).
5. Bae, J.-S., Seo, E.-J. and Kang, I.-K., “Synthesis and Characte
tion of Heparinized Polyurethanes Using Plasma Glow D
charge,” Biomaterials, 20, 529-537(1999).
6. Huh, M. W., Kang, I.-K., Lee, D.-H., Kim, W. S., Lee, D. H., Park
L. S., Min, K. E. and Seo, K. H., “Surface Characterization a
Antibacterial Activity of Chitosan-Grafted Poly(ethylene terephth
late) Prepared by Plasma Glow Discharge,” J. of Applied Polymer
Science, 81, 2769-2778(2001).
7. Kang, I.-K., Choi, S.-H., Shin, D.-S. and Yoon, S. C., “Surface Mo
ification of Polyhydroxyalkanoate Films and Their Interaction wit
Human Fibrablasts,” International Journal of Biological Macromole-
cules, 28, 205-212(2001).
8. Ito, Y., Inaba, M., Chung, D.-J. and Imanishi, Y., “Control of Wat
Permeation by pH and Ionic Strength through a Porous Membr
Having Poly(carboxylic acid) Surface-Grafted,” Macromolecules, 25,
7313-7316(1992).
9. Lee, Y. M. and Shim, J. K., “Plasma Surface Graft of Acrylic Ac
onto a Porous Poly(vinylidene fluoride) Membrane and Its Ribof
vin Permeation,” J. of Applied Polymer Science, 61, 1245-1250(1996).
10. Lee, Y. M. and Shim, J. K., “Preparation of pH/Temperature Resp
sive Polymer Membrane by Plasma Polymerization and Its Ribo
vin Permeation,” Polymer, 38, 1227-1232(1997).
11. Yasuda, H. and Gazicki, M., “Biomedical Applications of Plasm
Polymerization and Plasma Treatment of Polymer Surfaces,” Bioma-
terials, 3, 68-77(1982).
12. Chen, J., Nho, Y.-C. and Park, J.-S., “Grafting Polymerization
Acrylic Acid onto Preirradiated Polypropylene Fabric,” Radiat. Phys.
Chem., 52, 201-206(1998).
13. Choi, S.-H., Park, S.-Y. and Nho, Y.-C., “Electrochemical Propert
of Polyethylene Membrane Modified with Carboxylic Acid Group,”
Radiat. Phys. Chem., 57, 179-186(2000).
14. Binh, D. and Huy, H. T., “The Effect of Concentration of Acryli
Acid, Dose Rates and Temperature on Preirradiated Graft of Nat
Rubber-based Thermoplastic Elastomer,” Radiat. Phys. Chem., 53,
���� �41� �2� 2003� 4�
������� � �� � 231
d-
a-
s
a-
c
w
e
.,
e
e)
rp-
-
ce
-
177-180(1998).
15. Siyam, T. and Youssef, H. A., “Cationic Resins Prepared by Radia-
tion-Induced Graft Copolymerization,” Radiat. Phys. Chem., 55, 447-
450(1999).
16. Ringrose, B. J. and Kronfli, E., “Preirradiation Grafting of Ethylene
Vinyl Acetate Copolymer Resins,” Radiat. Phys. Chem., 55, 451-
460(1999).
17. Dogue, I. L. J., Mermilliod, N., Boiron, G. and Staveris, S.,
“Improvement of Polypropylene Film Adhesion in Multilayers by
Various Chemical Surface Modification,” Int. J. Adhesion and Adhe-
sives, 15, 205-210(1995).
18. Dogue, I. L. J., Mermilliod, N. and Foerch, R., “Grafting of Acrylic
Acid onto Polypropylene-Comparison of Two Pretreatments: γ-irra-
diation and Argon Plasma,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in
Physics Research B, 105, 164-167(1995).
19. Lee, S. D., Hsiue, G.-H., Chang, P. C. and Kao, C.-Y., “Plasma-
induced Grafted Polymerization of Acrylic Acid and Subsequent
Grafting of Collagen onto Polymer Film as Biomaterials,” Biomate-
rials, 17, 1599-1608(1996).
20. Loh, F. C., Tan, K. L., Kang, E. T., Uyama, Y. and Ikada, Y., “Struc-
tural Studies of Polyethylene, Poly(ethylene terephthalate) and Poly-
styrene Films Modified by near U.V. Light Induced Surface Graft
Copolymerization,” Polymer, 36, 21-27(1995).
21. Lei, J. and Liao, X., “Surface Graft Copolymerization of Acrylic
Acid onto LDPE Film through Corona Discharge,” European Poly-
mer Journal, 37, 771-779(2001).
22. Chen, Y., Kang, E. T., Neoh, K. G. and Tan, K. L., “Chemical Mo
ification of Polyaniline Powders by Surface Graft Copolymeriz
tion,” Polymer, 41, 3279-3287(2000).
23. Xu, Z., Wang, J., Shen, L., Men, D. and Xu, Y., “Microporou
Polypropylene Hollow Fiber Membrane, Part I. Surface Modific
tion by the Graft Polymerization of Acrylic Acid,” J. of Membrane
Science, 196, 221-229(2002).
24. Aliev, R., Garcia, P. and Burillo, G., “Graft Polymerization of Acryli
Acid onto Polycarbonate by the Preirradiation Method,” Radiat.
Phys. Chem., 58, 299-304(2000).
25. Ghosh, P., Chattopadhyay, B. and Sen, A. K., “Modification of Lo
Density Polyethylene(LDPE) by Graft Copolymerization with Som
Acrylic Monomers,” Polymer, 39, 193-201(1998).
26. Zhang, Y., Myung, S. W., Choi, H. S., Kim, I. H. and Choi, J. H
“Optimum Conditions for the Surface Modification of Polyurethan
by Oxygen Plasma Treatment,” Ind. Eng. Chem., 8, 236-240(2002).
27. Sofia, S. J., Premnath, V. and Merrill, E. W., “Poly(ethylene oxid
Grafted to Silicon Surfaces: Grafting Density and Protein Adso
tion,” Macromolecules, 31, 5059-5070(1998).
28. Konig, U., Nitschke, M., Menning, A., Eberth, G., Pilz, M., Arn
hold, C., Simon, F., Adam, G. and Werner, C., “Durable Surfa
Modification of Poly(tetrafluoroethylene) by Low Pressure H2O
Plasma Treatment Followed by Acrylic Acid Graft Polymeriza
tion,” Colloids Surf. B: Biointerf., 24, 63-71(2002).
HWAHAK KONGHAK Vol. 41, No. 2, April, 2003