Transcript
Page 1: Photo Credit:   patternsofnature.files.wordpress.com

Derived Properties of Warm Marine Low Clouds over the Southern Ocean: Precipitation Susceptibility and Sensitivity to

Environmental Parameters

Jay MaceTrevor FergusonStephanie AveySteve Cooper

Photo Credit: patternsofnature.files.wordpress.com

Page 2: Photo Credit:   patternsofnature.files.wordpress.com

The Southern Ocean is one of the cloudiest regions on Earth…

… and primarily populated by geometrically thin layers based in the boundary layer.

Page 3: Photo Credit:   patternsofnature.files.wordpress.com

Methodology:

1. Using WS climatology provided at GISS, collect A-Train hydrometeor layer statistics as a function of WS along the CloudSat Track

2. Aggregate the RL-GEOPROF data for that weather state over a period of time to characterize the layer properties

3. Examine regional similarities in hydrometeor layer distributions within a WS.

Use 3-years of A-Train data (2007,8,9) across the Pacific Basin

WS3: Anvils and Isolated Convection

Page 4: Photo Credit:   patternsofnature.files.wordpress.com

WS 5: Polar and High Latitudes

Dominated by low level clouds of moderate optical thickness – often with cirrus above.

Page 5: Photo Credit:   patternsofnature.files.wordpress.com

North:

South:

WS 5: Polar and High Latitudes

Page 6: Photo Credit:   patternsofnature.files.wordpress.com

The Inversion Algorithm

• Assumption: Bimodal PSD– cloud mode and precipitation modes

• Input: CloudSat Z Profile, 94 GHz Tb (New Product!), MODIS 0.55, 1.6, 2.1 um reflectances

• Output: Cloud LWC, re, Nd, and Precip LWC, re, Nd in each range bin.

• Prior data from RICO and MASE

Forward Models:

Radar Forward Model: Posselt and Mace (2013). Mie backscatter and extinction. Direct integration of modified gamma PSD’s. Accounts for air and droplet attenuation.

MODIS reflectances simulated using Radiant 2.0 eigenmatrix solver (Christi and Gabriel, 2004)

Microwave: Kummerow et al. (1993) with modifications by Lebsock. W-Band ocean emissivity developed by Greg Elsaesser at CSU.

The A-Train Observations:

• Cloudsat CPR is sensitive to precip when precip is present but cloud otherwise• MODIS Vis and NIR Reflectances sensitive to Cloud properties primarily but precip

contributes• Passive Microwave (from Cloudsat Noise - New!) responds to water path – mostly

cloud but precip contributes

Together these measurements have independent (but tangled) information on the cloud and precipitation coexisting within a profile.

Page 7: Photo Credit:   patternsofnature.files.wordpress.com

Southern Ocean Attenuation Comparison:Observed by Cloudsat – calculated from retrieved microphysics

Page 8: Photo Credit:   patternsofnature.files.wordpress.com

Examples: Warm Shallow Cumulus in the SE Pacific20070106, orbit 03691

NonPrecipitating Case94 GHz Tb: 246 KMODIS 550 nm: 0.62MODIS 1.6 um: 0.48MODIS 2.1 um: 0.31

Cloud Number: 80 cm-1 ±±60%

Cloud LWC: 0.2 g m-3

±70%Cloud re: 10 um ±30%

Precipitating Case94 GHz Tb: 259 KMODIS 550 nm: 0.63MODIS 1.6 um: 0.45MODIS 2.1 um: 0.23

Cloud Number: 80 cm-1 ±±120%

Cloud LWC: 0.3 g m-3

±130%Cloud re: 20 um ±180%

Precip Rate: 80 mm/day ±40%

Page 9: Photo Credit:   patternsofnature.files.wordpress.com
Page 10: Photo Credit:   patternsofnature.files.wordpress.com
Page 11: Photo Credit:   patternsofnature.files.wordpress.com

Examine the Co-Dependence of Albedo and Precipitation Susceptibility in Warm Shallow Clouds of the Southern Ocean

Periods Considered: Winter, 2008, ~11,000 Profiles Summer, 2007, ~32,000 Profiles

Page 12: Photo Credit:   patternsofnature.files.wordpress.com

Co-Dependence of Albedo and Precipitation Susceptibility: Seasonal Comparison

Summer Winter

# Profiles: 11140# Profiles: 32389

Summer Microphysics Stats

• Ncld=90 cm-3

• LWP=120 g m-2

• Prate=22 mm day-1

• Albedo=0.4• Prate> 1mm/day: 68%• Prate> 10 mm/day: 20%

Winter Microphysics Stats

• Ncld=9 cm-3

• LWP=98 g m-2

• Prate=23 mm day-1

• Albedo=0.2• Prate> 1mm/day: 89%• Prate> 10 mm/day: 32%

Page 13: Photo Credit:   patternsofnature.files.wordpress.com

Consistency with Feingold et al., (2013)Feingold et al. (2013) show that• Cloud environments dominated by autoconversion are sensitive to Nd • Cloud environments dominated by accretion are less sensitive to Nd• S0 maximum increases for autoconversion dominated environments• Accretion dominated environments transition rapidly to lower S0

Lower Nd, Transitions to accretion dominated regime at lower S0 for LWP > 250 g/m2

Higher Nd, remains in autoconversion dominated regime with higher S0 and no obvious transition

Summer Winter

Page 14: Photo Credit:   patternsofnature.files.wordpress.com

Summary

• Atrain provides unique information regarding the relationships between warm cloud properties and light precipitation properties

• Information is distributed between radar, passive microwave, solar reflectance.• Uncertainties in cloud properties are substantial in the presence of precipitation

when cloud property retrievals rely more on passive measurements.

• Southern Ocean clouds and precipitation show large seasonal amplitudes in cloud and precipitation properties

• Results consistent with seasonal oscillations in sulfate aerosol and sensitivity to sea salt aerosol due to surface winds

• Results suggest • 1st indirect effect (albedo susceptibility) remains active in summer and winter• 2nd aerosol indirect effect (precip susceptibility) diminishes in winter consistent

with Feingold et al. modeling work.

Photo Credit: patternsofnature.files.wordpress.com

Page 15: Photo Credit:   patternsofnature.files.wordpress.com

“If you look deeply, you can see the clouds in the rain …” Thich Naht Hanh, Zen Buddhist Monk

Page 16: Photo Credit:   patternsofnature.files.wordpress.com

Left Profile: • More LWC information. • Cloud droplets are bigger

relative to precip, so radar contributes to information

Right Profile: • Less LWC information.

• Cloud droplets are smaller relative to precip and passive data contributes more than radar.

Page 17: Photo Credit:   patternsofnature.files.wordpress.com

Graciosa Island

Page 18: Photo Credit:   patternsofnature.files.wordpress.com

re=25 umN=15 cm-3

re=110 umN=0.2 cm-3

re=15 umN=20 cm-3

re=110 umN=0.08 cm-3

Page 19: Photo Credit:   patternsofnature.files.wordpress.com

NonPrecipitating Case Precipitating Case

Examples: Warm Shallow Cumulus in the SE Pacific

Cloud Droplet Number

Page 20: Photo Credit:   patternsofnature.files.wordpress.com

NonPrecipitating Case Precipitating Case

Examples: Warm Shallow Cumulus in the SE Pacific

LWC Info Content

Page 21: Photo Credit:   patternsofnature.files.wordpress.com

From Klein et al., (2013)

The ubiquitous low cloud cover over the Southern Ocean remains a challenge for climate model simulations

Page 22: Photo Credit:   patternsofnature.files.wordpress.com

NonPrecipitating Case Precipitating Case

Examples: Warm Shallow Cumulus in the SE Pacific

Cloud Liquid Water

Page 23: Photo Credit:   patternsofnature.files.wordpress.com

NonPrecipitating Case Precipitating Case

Examples: Warm Shallow Cumulus in the SE Pacific

Cloud Effective Radius

Page 24: Photo Credit:   patternsofnature.files.wordpress.com

NonPrecipitating Case Precipitating Case

Examples: Warm Shallow Cumulus in the SE Pacific

LWC Sensitivity

Note the magnitudes

Note the relative contributions

Page 25: Photo Credit:   patternsofnature.files.wordpress.com

Summer

Winter

Page 26: Photo Credit:   patternsofnature.files.wordpress.com

SummerLow Wind

SummerHigh Wind

Page 27: Photo Credit:   patternsofnature.files.wordpress.com

WinterLow Wind

WinterHigh Wind

Page 28: Photo Credit:   patternsofnature.files.wordpress.com

SummerLow Wind

WinterLow Wind

Page 29: Photo Credit:   patternsofnature.files.wordpress.com

SummerHigh Wind

WinterHigh Wind

Page 30: Photo Credit:   patternsofnature.files.wordpress.com

Knowledge of precipitation processes within dynamical environment are central to understanding ….

Advanced cloud parameterizations (Weber and Quas, 2012) attempt to represent subgrid statistics of precip processes with little knowledge of what actually exists in nature (Morrison and Gettelemen, 2008)

Our Goal: Build on Lebsock et al. to derive simultaneous cloud-precip property statistics within dynamical regimes of the Southern Ocean.

Page 31: Photo Credit:   patternsofnature.files.wordpress.com

Examine the Co-Dependence of Albedo and Precipitation Susceptibility in Warm Shallow Clouds of the Southern Ocean

Albedo Susceptibility (Platnick and Twomey, 1994):

SA=dA/dlnN

Painemal and Minnis, 2012 Sorooshian et al, 2009

Precipitation Susceptibility (Feingold and Stevens, 2009):

SA=dlnP/dlnN

Page 32: Photo Credit:   patternsofnature.files.wordpress.com

Co-Dependence of Albedo and Precipitation Susceptibility: Summer – Low Wind vs. High Wind

Low Wind Tercile (<5 m/s) High Wind Tercile (>12 m/s)

# Profiles: 10796# Profiles: 10796

Summer Low Wind Microphysics Stats

• Ncld=99 cm-3

• LWP=110 g m-2

• Prate=18 mm day-1

• Albedo=0.39• Prate> 1 mm/day: 64%• Prate> 10 mm/day: 17%

Summer High Wind Microphysics Stats

• Ncld=133 cm-3

• LWP=125 g m-2

• Prate=23 mm day-1

• Albedo=0.40• Prate> 1 mm/day: 70%• Prate> 10 mm/day: 22%

Page 33: Photo Credit:   patternsofnature.files.wordpress.com

Co-Dependence of Albedo and Precipitation Susceptibility: Winter - Low Wind vs. High Wind

Low Wind Tercile High Wind Tercile

# Profiles: 3715# Profiles: 3715

Winter Low Wind Microphysics Stats

• Ncld=7 cm-3

• LWP=86 g m-2

• Prate=15 mm day-1

• Albedo=0.18• Prate> 1 mm/day: 88%• Prate> 10 mm/day: 28%

Winter High Wind Microphysics Stats

• Ncld=13 cm-3

• LWP=107 g m-2

• Prate=37 mm day-1

• Albedo=0.21• Prate> 1 mm/day: 90%• Prate> 10 mm/day: 39%

Page 34: Photo Credit:   patternsofnature.files.wordpress.com

So, What is going on?

• Sulfate aerosol decreases significantly from Summer to Winter

Ayers and Gras (1991)Cape Grim (41 S)

Kloster et al (2005)Amsterdam Is. (37 S)

• Sea salt aerosol increases with wind speed

O’Dowd et al., 1997

Feingold et al., 2013: Is the precipitation process dominated by autoconversion (Nd dependent) or accretion? LES suggest that S diminishes with decreasing Nd at a given LWP.


Recommended