1- Building the project team
1- Identify necessary skills
sets.
2- Identify the people who match
skills.
3- Talk to potential team members
4- Negotiate with functional heads
5- Builds in fallback positions.
6- Assemble the team
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
6-2
Building the team
1- Identify necessary skill sets:
• The 1st step is to conduct a realistic assessment of all needed types of skills, in order to complement each other and perform the project duties
2- Identify people who match the skills.
• We have 2 options:
• 1- Hire new personnel for the project
• 2- train current personnel to become proficient in the needed skills.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
6-3
Building the team
3- Talk to potential team members.
• The 3rd step consists of opening team communication with likely candidates for the team to assess their level of interest in the project.
4- Negotiation with functional heads.
• At the same time, we PM must begin to enter in negotiation with the functional heads.
• These conversations could be complex and lengthy.
• Depriving a functional manager of key personnel to serve on a project team can be seen as threatening the operating department. (next)
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
6-4
Building the team
4- Negotiation with functional heads.
• Negotiation is required to decide in some issues:
• How long are the team member’s services required? (full time, part time, and the period)
• Who should choose the person to be assigned to the project?
• What happens when special circumstances arises? (the employee may be recalled from his department. How the PM will replace him?)
5- Build in Fallback Positions
• If the negotiations are not fruitful, the PM is faced with 3 basic alternatives:
• 1- Try to negotiate for partial assistance.
• 2- Adjust project schedules and priorities accordingly.
• 3- Notify the management of the consequences.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
6-5
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
6-6
2- Effective Project Teams
Clear Sense of Mission: the mission should be mutually
understood and accepted by all team members.
Productive Interdependency: it refers to the degree of
joint activity among team members required in order to complete a
project. The concept of differentiation suggests that each individual
brings preconceived notions to the team. The interdependencies
refers to the degree of knowledge of the team interrelated efforts.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
6-7
Effective Project Teams
Cohesiveness: refers to the degree of mutual attraction
that team members hold for one another and their task.
Trust: for PM, trust refers to the team’s comfort level with
each individual member. Given the comfort level, trust is
manifested in the team’s ability and willingness to squarely
address differences of opinion, values and attitudes and deal
with them accordingly.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
6-8
Effective Project Teams Enthusiasm: it is the catalyst for directing positive, high energy
toward project. It creates energy that drive effective project efforts. It
creates an environment that is:
Challenging: it offers the opportunity of personal growth, new
learning and the ability to stretch professionally.
Supportive: PM members gain a sense of team spirit and
group identity : communication, problem solving…
Personally rewarding: PM become more enthusiastic as they
perceive personal benefits arising from project completion.
Results Orientation: outcomes are related toward the same
orientation.
3- Reasons why teams fail
1- Poor developed or unclear goals
2- Poorly defined project team roles
and interdependencies.
3- lack of project team motivation
4- Poor communication
5- Poor leadership 6- Turnover among
project team members.
7- Dysfunctional behavior.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
6-9
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
6-10
3- Reasons Why Teams Fail
1- Poorly developed or unclear goals Unclear goals permit multiple interpretations.
Unclear goals impede the willingness of team members to work together,
Unclear goals increase conflict.
2- Poorly defined project team roles & interdependencies.
Interdependencies: is a state where team members’ activities coordinate with and complement other team members’ work.
Unawareness of interdependencies leads to lose time.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
6-11
3- Reasons Why Teams Fail
3- Lack of project team motivation The project is perceived as unnecessary.
The project may have low priority.
4- Poor communication Could be caused by: different orientations or
background, , uncertainty about the project structure and interdependencies…
Resolving poor communication by: standard information sharing, a frank atmosphere, and open exchanges.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
6-12
3- Reasons Why Teams Fail 5- Poor leadership
Refer to chapter 4.
6-Turnover among project team members
The higher the turnover among project team members, the
more it disrupts the project manager’s ability to create project
team cohesion.
The continual act of adding and removing personnel to project
teams causes problems with team learning and functionning.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
6-13
3- Reasons Why Teams Fail
7-Dysfunctional behavior
It refers to disruptive acts of some project team
members due to: personality issues, hidden agendas or
interpersonal problems.
The solution calls for recognizing the members
involved and taking corrective steps.
A serious case may require to remove the concerned
team member.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
6-14
4- Stages in Group Development
• The process of group development is a dynamic
one.
• Groups go through several maturation stages that
are identifiable.
• The stages are: forming, storming, norming,
performing and adjourning.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
6-15
4- Stages in Group Development
1. Forming – members become acquainted
1. Members get to know one another to mold into a coherent
project team.
2. They lay the basis for project and ground rules: standards of
behavior, communication channel…
2. Storming – conflict begins
1. Conflict begins because team members begin to resist
authority.
2. Some hidden agendas, attempt to rewrite team rules.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
6-16
4- Stages in Group Development
3. Norming – members reach agreement
1. Norm is an unwritten rule of behavior.
2. Members agree on operating procedures and seek to work
together and develop closer relationships.
3. Members will commit to the project development process.
4. Performing – members work together to accomplish their tasks.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
6-17
4- Stages in Group Development
5. Adjourning – group disbands
1. Teams do not last forever.
2. At the completion of the project, team members will disband to
return to their functional duties in the organization.
3. Members will commit to the project development process.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
6-18
4- Stages in Group Development
Ponctuated Equilibrium– Connie Gersick developed a model for
project team development. She suggests that:
1. Most teams develop a set of operating norms very quickly.
2. These norms tend to guide group behavior and performance for
the project’s life.
3. Group will operate as a result of these norms until some trigger
event occurs, almost precisely at the halfway point between the
initial meeting and the project deadline.
4. The trigger may be: dissatisfaction with the project progress,
interpersonal antagonisms or other external force
Ponctuated Equilibrium–
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
6-19
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
6-20
Team Development Stages
1. Forming
2. Storming 3. Norming
4. Performing Convene Adjourn
Productive
Organized Infighting
Testing
Quiet Polite Guarded Impersonal Business-like High Morale
Establish procedures Develop team skills Confront issues Rebuild morale
Conflict over control Confrontational Alienation Personal agendas Low morale
Trust Flexible Supportive Confident Efficient High Morale
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
6-21
5- Achieving Cross-Functional Cooperation
Cross-functional cooperation
Task Outcomes
Psycho-Social Outcomes
Rules & Procedures
Physical Proximity
Accessibility
Superordinate Goals
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
6-22
5- Achieving cross-functional coordination
1. Superordinate goals –
1. It can be “ to develop a high-quality, user friendly, and generally
useful system that will enhance the operations of various
departments and functions.
2. It provides a central objective and an overriding goal.
2. Rules and procedures
1. They are essential because they offer a means for coordinating
or integrating activities that involve several units.
2. Project-specific rules and procedures facilitate its operations.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
6-23
5- Achieving cross-functional coordination
3. Physical proximity
1. Team members should be located within a physical spatial distances
that make it convenient to them to interact.
2. The more the team members are close, the more is their
cooperation and coordination.
4. Accessibility
1. It is the perception that a person is approachable for communicating
and interacting with problems for project success.
2. Inaccessibility occurs because of different work schedules, varied
duties and priorities, and commitment to other agendas.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
6-24
5- Achieving cross-functional coordination
5. Outcomes of cooperation
1. Tasks outcomes: refer to the factors involved in the the actual
implementation of the project: time, schedule and project
functionality.
2. Psychosocial outcomes: represent the team member’s
assessment that the project experience was worthwhile,
satisfying and productive.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
6-25
Building High-Performing Teams: 3 practical steps PM can take to build high-performing teams:
1st step: Make the project team tangible – Publicity
– Terminology & language
2nd step: Reward good behavior – Flexibility
– Creativity
– Pragmatism
3rd step: Develop a personal touch – Lead by example
– Positive feedback for good performance
– Accessibility & consistency
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
6-26
6- Virtual Project Teams
use electronic media to link members of a geographically dispersed project team
How Can Virtual Teams Be Improved? Use face-to-face communication when possible
Don’t let team members disappear (get together via videoconferencing, e-mail and internet connections)
Establish a code of conduct: get an agreement on types of information that need to be shared.
Keep everyone in the communication loop: awareness to keep the communication channels open.
Create a process for addressing conflict: PM should create a set of guidelines for allowing free expression or disagreement among team members.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
6-27
7- Conflict Management
Conflict is a process that begins when you perceive that someone has frustrated or is about to frustrate a major concern of yours.
Categories • Goal-oriented
• Administrative
• Interpersonal
Views • Traditional
• Behavioral
• Interactionist
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
6-28
7- Conflict Management
Conflict is a process that begins when you perceive that someone has
frustrated or is about to frustrate a major concern of yours.
Most types of conflict fit within 3 categories:
• Goal-oriented conflict:
• associated with disagreements regarding results, scope outcomes, performance specifications,…
• It result from a poor or vague or incomplete perception of the goals that may allow the team members to make their own interpretations.
• Administrative conflict:
• Arises through management hierarchy, organizational structure or philosophy (authority and decisions).
• Interpersonal conflict:
• Arises from personality differences.
• It includes work ethics, behavioral styles, egos….
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
6-29
Sources of Conflict
Organizational
• Reward systems
• Scarce resources
• Uncertainty
• Differentiation
Interpersonal • Faulty attributions
• Faulty communication
• Personal grudges & prejudices
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
6-30
Conflict Resolution
Mediate – PM uses defusion or confrontation to find a solution.
Defusion: PM is less concerned with the source of
conflict than with a mutually accepted solution.
Confrontation: involves working with both parties to
get at the root causes of the conflict.
Arbitrate – PM must be willing to impose a judgment on the warring
parties. After listening to both parties, the PM renders his decision which focuses
on the judgment itself. Ex: wrong, right….
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
6-31
Conflict Resolution
Control – Not all problems can be resolved. In some cases, pragmatic response to
conflict might give a cool down period. It is not a cowardly response, but a selective way
to choose the best manner PM should intervene .
Accept – some conflicts are unmanageable . We just live the conflict as it is.
Eliminate – Sometimes the guilty member(s) should be transfer red to stop the
reason while of the conflict.
Conflict is often evidence of progress!
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
6-32
8- Negotiation
a process that is predicated on a manager’s ability to use influence productively
Questions to Ask Prior to Entering a Negotiation
1. How much power do I have?
2. What sort of time pressures are there?
3. Do I trust my opponent?
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
6-33
Principled Negotiation
1. Separate the people from the problem
2. Focus on interests, not positions
3. Invent options for mutual gain
4. Insist on using objective criteria
Getting to Yes – Fisher & Ury
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
6-34