RANGELAND MANAGEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT TECHNIQUES IN
ZIMBABWE(NZIRA DZEKUVANDUDZA
NEKUCHENGETEDZA MAFURO MUZIMBABWE)
Eddington Gororo20 March 2013
Grasslands Research Institute, Marondera
2
Outline (Zvatichakurukura)
1. Introduction (Nhanganyaya) The need for rangeland improvement Zvikonzero zvekuvandudza mafuro
2. Range improvement (kuvandudza mafuro) Rangeland improvement methods Nzira dzekuvandudza mafuro
3. Rangeland management (Kushandisa mafuro) Rangeland management techniques Kushandisa mafuro kwakanaka
4. Conclusion (Saka tiri kutii?)5. Discussion (Hurukuro)
3
Need for rangeland improvementSei tichifanira kufunga nezvemafuro
edu? Deterioration evidenced by:1. Changes in grass species composition –
invader/increaser species (Sporobolus, Aristida)2. Proliferation of undesirable/invasive plants e.g.,
forbs3. Bush encroachment and tree recruitment – we have
to arrest plant succession at the grass stage4. Soil erosion5. Accumulation of top hamper and moribund
material Ultimately low animal productivity (growth rates,
conception rates, milk yields, grades)
4
Changes in species compositionHuswa huri kushanduka mumafuro
5
Undesirable & invasive plantsMiti nehuswa hwusingadyiwe
nemombe
6
Bush encroachment and tree recruitment
Miti iri kuwanda kupfuura huswa
7
Accumulation of top hamper Huswa hauchanyotsomera marara
awanda
8
Grass tufts die out (become moribund)Zvidzitsi zveuswa zviri kufa
9
Rangeland ImprovementKuvandudza mafuro
Kuvandudza kuita sei? = improving range (natural veld) condition
and productivity or facilitate more efficient utilization of the range.
Tinovandidzirei mafuro? (Reasons) increased forage yields and quality
goho remafuro rinokwirira higher stocking rates
tinochengeta mombe dzakawanda pahekita Increased animal productivity and daily
performance (better milk yields, higher conception rates, faster growth rates)
10
Reasons for rangeland Improvement Tinovandidzirei mafuro?
Sustainable futureMafuro anoramba achiita zvakanaka mune ramangwana
Soil erosion control (ivhu harichaende nemvura kana mhepo)
Reduction of undesirable plants (miti isinei neufuro haizokuri)
Reduction of fire hazards (moto yesango inoita mishoma)
11
Nzira Dzekuvandudza Mafuro1. Rangeland fertilization (kuisa fetiraiza
mumafuro)2. Control of undesirable plants (kubvisa miti
nehufuro husingadiwe)3. Range rehabilitation (kugadzirisa
zvakakanganisika)4. Reinforcement (kuwedzera humwe huswa)5. Replacement with sown pastures (kuisa
mafuro matsva)6. Improved grazing management
(Mashandisiro)
12
Kuisa fetiraiza mumafuro
Types: Ammonium Nitrate (AN), single supers
How– every 4 years (kamwe chete mumakore mana)
Benefits/Zvakanakira kuisa fetiraiza increased forage yields and quality (goho
rinokwirira) higher stocking rates (tinochengeta mombe
dzakawanda) Increased animal productivity Reduction of undesirable plants
13
Kuisa fetiraiza mumafuro
Disadvantages/Matambudziko Poor response to fertiliser application (mutsauko
wacho mudiki mumafuro atagara tiinawo) Rangelands areas have limited land use capability
- water-logged vlei soils; shallow soils, steep slopes, rockiness, etc. (nzvimbo dzine mafuro hadzirimike uye dzinonetsa kuisa fetiraiza)
High cost (fetiraiza inodhura) Shortages (fatiraiza yacho haiwanikwi) Generally not economic on native pasture in
Zimbabwe Not recommended (nzira iyi hatiikurudzire)
14
Control of undesirable plants Kubvisa miti nehufuro husingadiwe
These are plants that are: Not readily eaten by animals Less productive or reduce veld productivity Reduce amount of utilisable herbage Conflict with veld management
Undesirable plants: Invader and invasive species Poisonous species
E.g., Lantana camara, Dichapetalum cymosum, Urginea sanguinea, Solanum incanum (nhundurwa), etc.
Bushes and trees
15
Control of undesirable plants Kubvisa miti nehufuro husingadiwe
16
Control of undesirable plants Kubvisa miti nehufuro husingadiwe
Bushes and trees Removal by stumping, ring barking, or by
mechanical means like bulldozers, brush-cutters and motorized saws.
chemicals (arboricides eg picloran, bromacil etc)
use of prescribed hot fires Bushes and other undesirable plants
practicing good veld management Prescribed hot burns (fire).
17
Range rehabilitation (kugadzirisa zvakakanganisika)
Degraded and eroded areas Methods of rehabilitation
Thatching and brush laying Pitting Stone lines Planting grass lines- e.g., vetiver grass (Vetiveria
zizanoides), elephant grass (Pennisetum purpurem) and paspalum (Paspalum notatum).
Often a combination of techniques is needed for most effective and rapid rehabilitation.
Rehabilitation is an attractive option on a small-scale but almost not feasible on a large scale.
18
Rangeland Reinforcement (kuwedzera humwe huswa mumafuro aripo)
Veld reinforcement entails the sowing of improved grass and legume species into native pasture
This is the most feasible means by which rangeland productivity can be raised above natural levels in this country.
Most effective when legume content is >30% in veld
Legumes planted into the top-land veld and grasses into vleis.
19
Reinforcement with legumes
Fix nitrogen (80-100kg N/ha) Come away earlier in the season Legumes have higher feeding value in late
summer and winter (extend grazing season) Results in Zimbabwe:
Grazing capacity increased by up to 20% Production increased by over 50%
At Grasslands, steers on improved veld gained 40kg/year more than those on unimproved veld
20
Natural veld with silverleaf
21
Reinforcement with improved grasses
In vleis/wetter areas we find that often improved grasses are more suitable than legumes.
The following improved grass species are suitable for veld reinforcement in vleis in Zimbabwe: Acroceras macrum (Nile grass) Brachiaria arrecta (tanner grass) Paspalum urvillei (vasey grass) Panicum repens (torpedo grass) Paspalum dilatatum (dallis grass)
22
Rangeland reinforcement
High rainfall areas – Desmodium spp (heavier soils) Stylosanthes spp (lighter soils)
Low rainfall areas – siratro, cassia and Archer The benefits of rangeland improvement include:
greater range productivity increased forage quantity and quality improved animal performance and reduced winter protein supplementation. Reduced fattening costs due to higher induction
masses This strategy for veld improvement is highly
recommended in Zimbabwe
23
Replacement with sown pastures (kuisa mafuro matsva)
Native grassland is ploughed out and completely replaced with highly productive pasture grasses
Dryland temporary pastures – short term leys, they form part of the cropping system. rotation with tobacco for rootknot nematode
tolerance - Katambora Rhodes grass (Chloris gayana)
Also: forage sorghum, millets, velvet bean, lablab, etc.
Need little fertilisation as they rely on residual fertility from crops
24
Replacement with sown pastures (kuisa mafuro matsva)
Permanent dryland pastures – star grass, kikuyu, napier grass, etc. species should respond well to nitrogen
fertilisation and withstand severe defoliation/grazing pressure.
Irrigated pastures very expensive form of production mostly used for finishing cattle and for
dairying. Ryegrass, Lucerne (alfalfa) and clovers are the
most suitable species for irrigated pastures.
25
KUCHENGETEDZA MAFURO(Sound range and grazing management
principles)
Principles to be discussed1. Stocking rates2. Period of stay3. Resting 4. Top hamper removal5. Grazing systems6. Use of fire (Prescribed burning)
26
Stocking rates
Stocking rate is the number of hectares allocated by the farmer for each livestock unit (i.e., a beast weighing 500kg)
It is the most important factor affecting productivity and stability of the veld.
Correct stocking rates are important for the perpetuation of the range (condition and productivity), well-being of the livestock and the economic stability of livestock operation.
Overstocking results in overgrazing. Under grazing leads to a build-up of top hamper,
reduction of forage value and productivity and animal production.
27
Recommended stocking rates
Natural Region
Rainfall (mm)
Stocking Rate (ha/LU)
NR I >1,000 3.5
NR II >800 3.5
NR III 500-950 5.5
NR IV 400 8.0NR V <400 12
28
Potential grazing capacity of grassveld types described by Rattray (1957) when in good condition (Gammon 1983)
Veld type
Description Grazing capacity (ha/LU)
1 Montane grassveld 2-3
2a Hyperrhenia grassveld 2.5-3.5
2b Hyperrhrnia-other species veld
4-5
3 Heteropogon-other species veld
5-6
4 Eragrostis-other species veld
7.5-10
5 Aristida-other species veld
10-16
6 Cenchrus-other species veld
7.5-10
7 Aristida-dactyloctenium-Eragrostis veld
12-20
29
Grazing period
Depends on: veld condition season stocking density veld type
Frequent close grazing will reduce grass vigour Too long a grazing period will lead to more
frequent defoliation of the more desirable species
Too short a grazing period will lead to too light defoliation of certain species and accumulation of top hamper
30
Grazing period
The rule of thumb in high rainfall areas (>700mm) in mid-summer is that the maximum grazing period in days should be no longer than 60 divided by the number of paddocks per herd.
In early summer grazing period should be half that of mid-summer and in winter can be longer because the grass is dormant
31
Rest period
A period of no graze after defoliation or grazing
The objectives of rest are many and varied as is their timing and duration
Rests Based on the requirements of the animals• For herbage accumulation (optimum
intake)• To provide for herbage accumulation for
conservation (hay, foggage, silage)
32
Rest period
Rests based on the requirements of the plants• improve forage quality, species
composition, plant density and vigour• seed production• seedling establishment• vegetative growth of the plant• promote rapid growth phase of the plant
Rests for management purposes• To accumulate sufficient fuel for a prescribed
late winter burn
33
Recommendations for grazing cycles in mid-summer
Veld type Grazing period
Rest period
Sweet veld 3 weeks 35-45 days
Sour veld 6 weeks >60 days
34
Removal of top hamper
The accumulation of old grass in a tuft reduces the vigour of the sward by shading out basal buds and hinders grazing
Control of top hamper accumulation Correct stocking rates, grazing and rest
periods fencing off areas of similar vegetation type for
a more uniform utilisation of the veld Trampling by cattle Cool fire just before the flush of grass in spring
35
Grazing systems
Set Stocking All livestock are
managed as a single herd and kept in a single paddock (whole farm) for the entire grazing period
SR should be 20% less than normal grazing capacity
Only SR is variable
Deferred grazing Also called rotational
resting e.g., split season
system grazing is subdivided
into one enclosure more than the number of herds. The extra paddock is afforded a full rest for a season or full year
Continuous Grazing
(set stocking)
Grazed
Grazed
Rested
36
Grazing systems
Rotational resting and grazing
It incorporates both rotational grazing and rotational resting (deferred grazing) simultaneously
Rotational
grazing
37
Prescribed burning
38
Prescribed burning
Fire is both inevitable and necessary for maintaining the structure and functioning of mesic savanna rangelands.
Used for: removal of surplus vegetation (moribund
material or top hamper) prevention of accidental fires suppression of tree recruitment and thus
control bush encroachment
39
Prescribed burning
Effects of a fire depend on: fire intensity
Hot – control tree recruitment Cool – top hamper removal
frequency of burning 4 years or longer
Season Early summer burns – top hamper removal Late dry season burns - to control encroaching plants
type of fire ground fires, surface fires and crown fires Head fire, backfire
40
Communal area grazing
Tragedy of the commons Controlled grazing schemes Improving crop residue quality, collection
and utilisation Incorporation of fodder and forage
production in cropping systems ley pastures on fallow land, contours and
waterways fodder banks of multi-purpose legume trees
Forage conservation (hay, silage)
41
NDATENDA