2
GOALS AND INTRODUCTIONS
Take a few minutes and… Introduce yourselves at your tablesDiscuss where you’re at with the Report
Cards and the new accountability systemDiscuss your goals for the day
One person from each group to share thoughts/goals
3
GOALS
Become more familiar and comfortable with the School Report Card
Be able to basically compute (or describe) the components of the School Accountability Score
Develop or access resources for communicating these changes
Develop a communication plan Other?
4
AGENDA
Review changes in accountability system NAEP cut-scores AMOs
Report Card overview Report Card “Priority Area” calculations Overall accountability index Available resources Communication Lunch Networking – calculation, communication,
clarification
5
WI ESEA WAIVER & AGENDA 2017
Standards and Instruction Common Core State Standards in ELA and math RtI and PALS Digital learning and dual enrollment
Assessment and Data Systems SMARTER Balanced Assessments – NAEP
proficiency ACT suite Statewide information and data system
School and Educator Effectiveness New accountability system w/ new School Report
Cards Educator evaluation system
6
CHANGING ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM
Multiple Measures Single year to three year average “NAEPized” cut scores Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs)
7
NAEPIZED CUT SCORES
WKCE Reading Scale Score by GradePerformance
Level 3 4 5 6 7 8 10Advanced
507 536 546 573 590 613 644Proficient
475 498 503 525 535 548 566Basic
445 462 464 479 486 493 496Minimal
Performance270 280 290 300 310 330 350
READING Minimal Performance Basic Proficient Advanced
Third Grade 270-393 394-429 430-465 466-640
Fourth Grade 280-395 396-439 440-488 489-650
Fifth Grade 290-400 401-443 444-496 497-690
Sixth Grade 300-417 418-456 457-513 514-730
Seventh Grade 310-433 434-466 467-522 523-780
Eighth Grade 330-444 445-479 480-538 539-790
Tenth Grade 350-455 456-502 503-554 555-820
New
Old
8
NAEPIZED CUT SCORES
On average, WI students are above the national, but there are still major gaps
9
NAEPIZED CUT SCORES
On average, WI students are above the national, but there are still major gaps
10
NAEPIZED CUT SCORES
DPI resources: http://dpi.wi.gov/oea/pdf/impactdata.pdf -
explanation of the new cut scores http://dpi.wi.gov/oea/pdf/highexp.pdf - one page
overview of increased expectations http://dpi.wi.gov/sprntdnt/doc/ltr-repcard.doc -
DPI sample letter to parents noting increased expectations and changing cut-scores
Time to discuss strategies to build understanding (~10 min)
11
ANNUAL MEASURABLE OBJECTIVES (AMOS)
No more AYP targets – now considering AMOs
Refer to: http://dpi.wi.gov/oea/amo.html
12
ANNUAL MEASURABLE OBJECTIVES (AMOS)
No more AYP targets – now considering AMOs
Refer to: http://dpi.wi.gov/oea/amo.html
14
ANNUAL MEASURABLE OBJECTIVES
Title I Priority and Focus Schools – exit criteriaTitle I Priority – lowest achievement,
required reformsTitle I Focus – low subgroups, reform choiceshttp://dpi.wi.gov/sprntdnt/pdf/fs-t1_p_f.pdf
District AMOsDistrict Report Cards next year – average
index for each level (ES, MS, HS)At least one level (ES, MS, HS) “meets
expectations”No schools in “fails to meet expectations”
16
Components:
1. Accountability Determination
2. Priority Areas
3. Student Engagement Indicators
4. School Information
5. WSAS Percent Proficient and Advanced
17
Components:
1. Accountability Determination
2. Priority Areas
3. Student Engagement Indicators
4. School Information
5. WSAS Percent Proficient and Advanced
Accountability Rating Category
Level of Support
Significantly Exceeds Expectations
Rewards and Replication
Exceeds Expectations
Rewards and Replication
Meets Expectations Local Improvement Efforts
Meets Few Expectations
State Support
Fails to Meet Expectations
State Support
18
Components:
1. Accountability Determination
2. Priority Areas
3. Student Engagement Indicators
4. School Information
5. WSAS Percent Proficient and Advanced
19
Components:
1. Accountability Determination
2. Priority Areas
3. Student Engagement Indicators
4. School Information
5. WSAS Percent Proficient and Advanced
20
Components:
1. Accountability Determination
2. Priority Areas
3. Student Engagement Indicators
4. School Information
5. WSAS Percent Proficient and Advanced
21
Components:
1. Accountability Determination
2. Priority Areas
3. Student Engagement Indicators
4. School Information
5. WSAS Percent Proficient and Advanced
22
QUICK BREAK + DISCUSSION
With your group discuss your questions about the Report Cards.
Look over the sample technical Report Card you picked up (Elementary level).
23
FOUR PRIORITY AREAS
Student Achievement
Student Growth
Closing Gaps
On-Track and Postsecondary Readiness
24
STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT
o Multiplier for performance levels o Divided by the average attendanceo More recent weighted moreo Scale of 50o See Report Card Data p. 2
25
STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT - WORKSHEET
Go to the worksheets for the Priority Areas – we’ll work through some sample data together
27
STUDENT GROWTH
o Points for meeting growth trajectory o Points off for meeting declining trajectoryo Complex calculations (“black box”)o Scale of 50o See the Report Card Data p. 4
28
STUDENT GROWTH - WORKSHEET
Go to the worksheets for the Priority Areas – we’ll work through some sample data
together
29
CLOSING GAPS
o Find the average change in subgroups’ scores
o Penalty if comparison group declineso Scale of 50o See the Report Card Data p. 6
30
CLOSING GAPS - WORKSHEET
Go to the worksheets for the Priority Areas – we’ll work through some sample data
together
31
CLOSING GAPS – GRADUATION (HS)
o Same procedure – using graduation rateso Worth 50 points, achievement worth 25
each
32
ON-TRACK AND POSTSECONDARY READINESS
o Combine: o Graduation or attendance rateo 3rd grade reading/8th grade matho ACT participation/performance (HS)
o See the Report Card Data p. 8
33
ON-TRACK AND POSTSECONDARY READINESS - WORKSHEET
Go to the worksheets for the Priority Areas – we’ll work through some sample data
together
34
ELEMENTARY AND MIDDLE SCHOOL REPORT CARD
The four priority areas average to accountability determination as follows:• Student Achievement- 25%• Student Growth- 25%• Closing Gaps- 25%• On track indicators:
• Elementary• 20% attendance• 5% 3rd grade WKCE Reading Scores
• Middle • 20% attendance• 5% 8th grade WKCE Mathematics
Scores
35
THE HIGH SCHOOL REPORT CARD
Has only three priority areas to average to accountability determination:
Student Achievement: 37.5%
Student Growth 0%Closing Gaps: 37.5%On Track/ Post Secondary
Readiness: 25% 20% is the graduation rate 5% ACT Participation and
Performance
36
STUDENT ENGAGEMENT INDICATORS (P. 10)
Test Participation – 95% or higher
Absenteeism – no more than 13%
Dropouts – no more than 6 %
- 5 points each
37
OUTCOMES
Schools provided with information on strengths and weaknesses
Targeted support from DPI and partners to improve school performance
Rewards and recognition for high performing schools
38
AVAILABLE RESOURCES
eModule:http://dpi.wi.gov/oea/wiguiderpt/story.html Review handout of available resourceshttp://www.cesa2.k12.wi.us/programs/accountability/accountability.cfm Group discussion: which resources will we
be using?
39
DATA ACCESS AND INFORMATION
District Security AdministratorApplication Security AdministratorWeb Access Management SystemData Analysis and Report Tools
WISEdash now available
40
BUILDING SHARED UNDERSTANDING
Two parts (handout) – Group discussion:Roll out to various stakeholders
Who, how/structure, resources available?
Elevator talk – consistent message forWhat goes into the accountability score?What are these new NAEP cut-offs?What does this WSAS data graph mean?What happened to AYP? What are AMOs?
Share out by group
41
GOALS
Become more familiar and comfortable with the School Report Card
Be able to basically compute (or describe) the components of the School Accountability Score
Develop or access resources for communicating these changes
Develop a communication plan Other group goals
42
LET US KNOW HOW WE CAN HELP
Please, complete the evaluation now or at the end of the day.
Oct 3rd – “We have the Report Card, now what?” Questions?
Kevin Anderson – [email protected] Barlass – [email protected]
In the afternoon, we’ll focus on four things: 1)Networking 2)Developing a communication plan3)Going through the technical data calculations as desired4)Answering individual questions and providing individual
support