ANDRE A. VASCONCELOSSEGMENT I PORTFOLIO FALL 2007 - FALL 2010
curriculum vitae
ObjectiveSecure an entry-level designER-drafter position in a design firm with room for growth.
Education
● College: SEP. 06 TO PRESENTBoston Architectural College, candidate for Bachelor of architecture degree
● University: JAN. 01 TO DEC. 01Unip, Universidade Paulista, Såo Paulo, Brazil. Major in architecture and urban design
Summary of Skills● Design:Experience includes renovation projects involving designing and management, RENDERINGS, selection of finishes and materials, pROJECT documentation.
● Software:Fluent in Mac and Pc operating systems, AutoCAD, Sketch-Up Pro, Keynote, Adobe Illustrator and InDesign.
● Managerial:Make decisions in a timely manner, awareness, team work skills and communication skills.
● Languages:Fluent in Portuguese and English.
Experience
● INDEPENDENT PRACTICE 10 LINCOLN STREET street, SOMERVILLE, MA JUL. 10 to MARCH 11
$350,OOO RESIDENTIAL DESIGN, JOB INCLUDES, MANAGING ALL PHASES OF PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION, communicatION with client AND CONTRACTOR, generate CONSTRUCTION documentation and sketches, responsible for selection of finishes and materials.
● INDEPENDENT PRACTICE 10 LINCOLN STREET street, SOMERVILLE, MA DEC. 09 to SEPT. 10
$250,OOO RESIDENTIAL DESIGN, JOB INCLUDES MANAGING ALL PHASES OF PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION, communicatION with client AND CONTRACTOR, generate CONSTRUCTION documentation and sketches, responsible for BUDGET, selection of finishes and materials.
● Bay State Design: Auto CAD Drafter 70 Tower office park, Woburn, MA Jul. 07 to May 08 Interpret site sketches to convert them into lease exhibitions, zoning drawings, lease amendments and ultimately construction documents for the expansions of the telecom industry nationwide.
InterestsMinimalist architecture, urban design, landscape design, music and video production.
ANDRE A. VASCONCELOS 10 Lincoln street, Somerville, MA. 02145, Home: [617] 718 2818 Cell: [617] 800 6418 [email protected]
THIS PORTFOLIO IS A RESULT OF SEGMENT I FOR THE BACHELOR OF ARCHITECTURE CURRICULUMAT THE BOSTON ARCHITECTURAL COLLEGE.
EVOLVING MANIFESTO
If architecture is a feeling, I would rather be senseless.
If architecture is an art,I would rather not be artistic.
If architecture is a science,I would rather not be a scientist.
If architecture is organization, I would rather be disorganized.
If architecture is order, I would rather embrace chaos.
Architecture is the translation of human evolution,Therefore I must be part of it.
INTRODUCTIONINDEX : DRAFTING | STUDIOS | WORK
SUMMARYSEGMENT I PORTFOLIO FALL 2007 - FALL 2010
p. 1-4
FREE HANDINSTRUCTOR: NATALIE WATSON Fall 2006 VARIOUS PROJECTS
This class was an introduction to free-hand drawing. The most valuable lesson I learned in this class was how to visualize an object and trust my eyes to draw a picture. This eye trust that I have gained through Natalie is going to stay with me for the rest of my life.
P.1
DAVID
HERMAN MILLER “THE RIPPING SKIN” “THE BATH”IN CLASS MODEL
HOMEWORK “THE ECSTASY”HOMEWORK IN CLASS MODEL
DESIGN PRINCIPLESINSTRUCTOR: RICHARD GRISWoLD spring 2007 MIDTERM AND FINAL PROJECTS
Design Principles was an introduction to the study of architecture based on various types of 20th and 21st century buildings and readings. The most valuable lesson learned in this class was the ability to express ideas in a form of diagrams. The image on the left is my midterm project. It diagrams a capsule as to how my education as well as my interests will lead to prosperity in the architectural field. The image on the right is my final project in this class. It represents a diagram of all the material covered in this class. My conclusion was that the design principles class is the DNA of the architecture curriculum of Boston Architectural College. It is the school’s DNA because it deals with imminent modern design and the BAC so far has consistently shown to me as a designer how to critically think in these terms.
P.2
MIDTERM FINAL
SKETCH-UPINSTRUCTOR: LEWIS WADSWORTH Spring 2007 THE FARM MUSEUM PROJECT
For my final project in this class I proposed a museum situated in a farm land which I named the Farm Museum. This project involved not only a 3D model but an incorporation of a real landscape. The main idea of this proposal was to bring art and culture to a rural setting therefore expressing my desire to un-monopolize and un-conglomerate the urban setting thus distributing culture throughout the countryside.
AERIAL VIEW I
WEST ELEVATION
AERIAL VIEW II
P.3
SKETCH
NORTHEAST MAINE
This idea in my opinion would be a solution to traffic issues as well as a means of bringing interest for everyone. Design wise this museum incorporates the local landscape in an attempt to hide itself. The circular shape was chosen as an attempt to improve walkability in various levels of the building as well as to make a shape that is not alien to nature.
FRONTAL PERSPECTIVE
HAND DRAFT PERSPECTIVEINSTRUCTOR: DAVE HARRISON Spring 2007 FINAL PROJECTS
PERSPECTIVE B
PERSPECTIVE C
A B C
PERSPECTIVE A : INTERIOR NARIWA MUSUEM, JAPAN | DATE 1993-94 | ARCHITECT TADAO ANDO
PERSPECTIVE B : EXTERIOR NARIWA MUSUEM, JAPAN | DATE 1993-94 | ARCHITECT TADAO ANDO
PERSPECTIVE C : EXTERIOR PULITZER FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS, USA | DATE 1997-2001 | ARCHITECT TADAO ANDO
In this class Professor Dave Harrison, head of the Interior Design program at the Boston Architectural College. Mr. Harrison was a great mentor who helped me comprehend all there is in measured perspective. He took the time to explain concepts using real life examples. The knowledge acquired in this class was immensely beneficial to my career in the field of architecture, as a designer needs to be able to think three dimensionally.
P.4
PERSPECTIVE A
p. 5-9
A1INSTRUCTORS: TRAVIS BRIDGES | TOM COLLINS SPRING 2007 DREAM SPACE
The dream space project was based on the reading Black Vernacular - Architecture as Cultural Practice by Bell Hooks. Hooks talks about how architecture could be if anything relating to architecture was just a matter of desire, in other words, how architecture could be without economical, practical, governmental or cultural constraints. This reading is based on a little girl impoverished by her family’s economical situation. She imagines her dream house being constrained by her desires and nothing else. We were assigned to respond to the reading by creating a model that reflected our personal desires for a space. This project was a blank canvas in the sense that we did not have to incorporate surroundings, location or cultural constraints.
I based my design on a resting butterfly. My design is composed of three members: right, left and central, which are all proportionally balanced. Each member represents a political party. This design is a critique on our societal inequalities. I am not sure if this reading would be necessary if wealth and opportunity were equally distributed.
“...TO DESIGN A SPACE BASED ON DESIRE, WITH NO LIMITATIONS OR CONSTRAINTS. A PLACE WITH NO SENSE OF NECESSITY.”
P.5
MODEL
SKETCHES
A1INSTRUCTORS: TRAVIS BRIDGES | TOM COLLINS SPRING 2007 COLOR STUDY - MANUFACTURING/ARCHITECTURAL
The color study project was a study between the correlation of colors in the car manufacturing industry in comparison to the architectural industry. I was assigned to analyze the Hummer - the Mini Cooper and the Federal agency for the environment in Dessau, Germany.
LET’S BE SMARTSix standard airbags: Smart technology knows which airbags need to inflate when, and at what speed and force
Advanced Head Protection System (AHPS II). Two airbags that are technically not airbags. Call them sausages. They extend from A-pillar to C-pillar on both sides of the car. They protect all passengers’ heads and stay inflated longer than conventional airbags to keep protecting in the event of multiple impacts.
Rear Roll Hoops and reinforced A-pillar and frame for added rollover protection
Four standard airbags: Smart technology knows which airbags need to inflate when, and at what speed and force
Side thorax airbags in the sides of the front seats that protect the bodies and the heads of the driver and front co-pilot
Advanced crumple zones re-channel forces around the passenger compartment rather than through it
The latest generation 4-channel Anti-lock Braking System (ABS). Vented in front, solid in back. Brake surface area is larger than the classic Mini’s entire wheel.
High-tech CBC, EBD and DSC braking systems. Features too intensive to go into and short-change here. Be sure to visit MINIUSA.COM to learn the full story.
Flat tire monitor: Alerts driver the moment a tire’s revolution rate changes, indicating tire integrity has been compromised
Side-impact door beams are massive and, well, protect against side impact
Engine designed to break away from its mounts in a head-on collision to protect the legs of the driver and front co-pilot
LET’S SWEAT THE DETAILSHere’s a quick reference list of the most notable standard features on a MINI. Some we haven’t mentioned yet. And some are too good not to repeat.
MacPherson strut front suspension w/ multi-link rear suspension
Multifunction steering wheel
Electro-hydraulic, engine-speed-sensitive, power steering
Front and rear anti-roll (stabilizer) bars
Flat tire monitor
Driver/co-pilot seat-mounted, side-impact airbags
Center-mounted speedometer
Steering column-mounted tachometer
Anti-lock Braking Systems (ABS)
Driver and co-pilot airbags – Supplemental Restraint System, with “smart” dual-threshold, dual-stage deployment
Corner Brake Control (CBC)
Electronic Brakeforce Distribution (EBD)
Split fold-down rear seats for expandable cargo space
Side-impact door beams with interlocking anchoring system
Engine Immobilizer with coded driveway protection
Climate controlled glove box
Air conditioning with microfilter and air-recirculation
Remote entry, including 2-step unlocking and trunk release
Speed-sensitive intermittent windshield wipers
Power windows with “one-touch” down operation
Service interval indicator with miles-to-service readout
Anti-theft CD audio system with AM/FM radio, six speakers, presets, auxiliary input ready, satellite radio ready and pre-wired for 6-disc CD changer
Optional center armrest
Advanced Head Protection System (AHPS II)
Rear windshield wiper
WARRANTY*
At MINI, our commitment to quality and customer satisfaction is clearly demonstrated by a 4-year/50,000-mile New Passenger Car Limited Warranty, and a 12-year/unlimited-mileage warranty against rust and corrosion perforation.
FULL SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE IS STANDARD*
MINI also wants to ensure the proper performance of your vehicle, so we offer full maintenance as standard for 3 years/36,000 miles.
ROADSIDE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM*
The MINI owner experience continues out on the road. You are only a toll-free phone call away. MINI’s Roadside Assistance Program is available 24-hours a day, anywhere in the U.S., Canada and Puerto Rico. The program offers towing, lock-out service, on-site assistance and even custom computerized trip routing services. And for a nominal fee, the MINI Service Card extends this service after the New Passenger Car Limited Warranty for as long as you wish.
*For a list of terms and conditions for all the good stuff above, visit MINIUSA.COM
Use this key (not the kind that unlocks doors) to find out which feature is for which model:
LET’S FORGET ALL OUR ASSUMPTIONS ABOUT CARS
MINI COOPER MINI COOPER S
MINI COOPER CONVERTIBLE MINI COOPER S CONVERTIBLE MINI COOPER
MINI COOPER S MINI COOPER CONVERTIBLE MINI COOPER S CONVERTIBLE
MINI. LET’S MOTOR.®
©2005 MINI, a division of BMW of North America, LLC. The MINI name and logo are registered trademarks. BR0002-05
©2006 MINI, a division of BMW of North America, LLC. The MINI name and logo are registered trademarks. BR0001-06
MINI COOPER MINI COOPER S
MINI COOPER CONVERTIBLE MINI COOPER S CONVERTIBLE
MINI. LET’S MOTOR.®
Find a MINI Dealer at MINIUSA.COM
2007 H2 SUV SPECS & PERFORMANCE DATA
8,600 lb.
6,400 lb.
2,200 lb.
6,700 lb.
203.6 in.
81.7 in.WITH STANDARD
ROOF RAILS
81.2 in.
69.4 in.
122.8 in.
9.9 in.
25.8º
40.8º
39.6º
20 in.
16 in.
32 gal.
8,600 lb.
6,400 lb.
2,200 lb.
6,700 lb.
203.6 in.
79.2 in.
81.2 in.
69.4 in.
122.8 in.
9.7 in.
25.8º
40.8º
39.6º
20 in.
16 in.
32 gal.
8,600 lb.
6,400 lb.
2,200 lb.
6,700 lb.
203.6 in.
81.7 in.WITH STANDARD
ROOF RAILS
81.2 in.
69.4 in.
122.8 in.
10.8 in.WITH STANDARD REAR
AIR SUSPENSION ENGAGED
27.5ºWITH STANDARD REAR
AIR SUSPENSION ENGAGED
42.8ºWITH STANDARD REAR
AIR SUSPENSION
40.0ºWITH STANDARD REAR
AIR SUSPENSION ENGAGED
20 in.
16 in.
32 gal.
BASE MODEL H2 ADVENTURE H2 LUXURY
GROSS VEHICLE WEIGHT RATING (GVWR) NOTE 5
CURB WEIGHT
PAYLOAD, MAXIMUM NOTE 6
TRAILERING, MAXIMUM NOTE 7
VEHICLE LENGTH (WITH REAR TIRE CARRIER)
VEHICLE HEIGHT NOTE 8
VEHICLE WIDTH (EXCLUDING MIRRORS)
TRACK WIDTH
WHEELBASE
GROUND CLEARANCE
BREAK-OVER ANGLE
APPROACH ANGLE
DEPARTURE ANGLE
WATER FORDING DEPTH
VERTICAL SCALING HEIGHT
FUEL TANK CAPACITY
2007 H2 SUV SPECS & PERFORMANCE DATA
17” chromed wheelBlack roof rack crossbars (STD. ON ADVENTURE SERIES)
Chrome roof rack crossbars (STD. ON LUX SERIES)
Soft cargo carrier (REQ. ROOF RACK CROSSBARS)
Hard cargo carrier (REQ. ROOF RACK CROSSBARS)
Canoe/load stop (REQ. ROOF RACK CROSSBARS)
Roof basket (REQ. ROOF RACK CROSSBARS)
Roof-mounted bike carrier (REQ. ROOF RACK CROSSBARS)
Fork-mounted bike carrier (REQ. ROOF RACK CROSSBARS)
Ski/snowboard carrier–4 or 6 pair (REQ. ROOF RACK CROSSBARS)
Roof-mounted off-road lampsLow profile light barRoof rail handlesFront hitch-mounted portable winchWinching accessory kitBrush grille guard (STD. ON ADVENTURE SERIES)
Black wrap-around brush grille guardChrome wrap-around brush grille guardBlack tubular tail lamp guardsChrome tubular tail lamp guards Grille guard-mounted off-road lampsBlack tubular assist stepsChrome tubular assist steps (STD. ON LUX SERIES)
Removable “U” stepsChrome hood handlesChrome fuel door with locking gas capChrome hood latchesChrome retrieval loopsChrome tow loops
Chrome louverChrome air ventsHitch coverHitch-mounted step-to-roofBody color grilleTrailer hitch & ball mountsNeoprene seat coversMudder seat coversCustom carpet floor mats (STD. ON LUX SERIES)
Rubber mudder floor mats (STD. ON ADVENTURE SERIES)
Cargo area matCargo area linerRod Hall shocksPerformance exhaustVehicle coverMagnetic truck shieldsClear Cover ProtectionFirst aid and tool kit (STD. ON ADVENTURE SERIES)
Engine block heaterTrailering convenience packagePortable ARB freezer/fridgePortable air compressorTruck Vault® secure cargo drawerTactical mountain bikeWheel locksHUMMER Adventure KitFront Hitch ExtenderXM Radio
2007 H2 SUV EXTERIOR COLORS 2007 H2 SUV INTERIOR COLORS
BLACK YELLOWALL TERRAIN BLUEMETALLIC
PEWTERMETALLIC
WHEAT EBONYONLY AVAILABLE ON H2 LUXURY
BIRCH WHITE SLATE BLUEMETALLIC
TWILIGHT MAROONMETALLIC
H2SUV2007
SAUERBRUCH HUTTON ARCHITEKTEN | FEDERAL AGENCY FOR THE ENVIRONMENT | 2005
2006 HUMMER COLOR BROCHURE 2006 MINI COOPER COLOR BROCHURE
The relationship found between the Hummer and the Mini was the difference in size. The bigger car had very similar color when compared to the smaller one. Both offered bright colors and I believe the reason for this similarity is the lifetime of the product which in this case is a car. Cars are only meant to last a decade or so therefore car designers can be more concerned with an attractive rather than durable product.
On the other hand, when it comes to a building it is safe to choose more complementary color tones because a building, unlike a car, can last hundreds of years. Therefore my study incorporated complementary colors in a fashion where even the brightest colors could complement each other, thus producing a very effective way to develop either pleasing manufacturing products or works of architecture.
P.6PIXELS COMPLEMENTATION PALETTES
A1INSTRUCTORS: TRAVIS BRIDGES | TOM COLLINS SPRING 2007 2D/3D TRANSFORMATION MIDTERM
Study for an Unexecuted Wallhanging, 1926.
“Layer after layer of civilized life seems to have veiled our directness of seeing. We often look for an underlying meaning of things while the thing itself is the meaning.” -Anni Albers
P.7
UNEXECUTED WALL HANGING -ANNI ALBERS METAMORPHOSIS - WEEK 1 RHYTHM - WEEK 2
For the 2d|3d transformation project I was asked to transform a two dimensional piece of art, Annis Albers’ Unexecuted Wall Hanging, into a three dimensional space. When I first saw this piece I immediately saw the influence of the Bauhaus School of Design. I got this notion from the orderly linear pace of the elements within the piece. After analyzing it with more care, I was able to see an alternating rhythm. Going deeper I saw that the piece most likely went through a process of metamorphosis, which started with the renunciation of old methods created by all artistic movements in history.
The Bauhaus was in search of new methods of design and eventually disseminated the modernist movement. My initial investigation left me with two main ideas; Product and Metamorphosis. Product is defined as something produced by human effort or by nature. Metamorphosis is defined as marked to complete change in appearance, character or form. The completion of my initial assignments led me to the idea of a rhythm. Rhythm is defined as a visual tempo or beat, the principle of design that refers to a regular repetition of elements of art to produce, the look and feel of movement. Rhythm is often achieved through careful placement of repeated components which invite the viewer’s eye to jump rapidly or glide smoothly from one component to the next.
Alternating rhythm examples are: ABC-ABC-ABC-DEF-DEF-DEF-ABC-ABC-ABC-DEF-DEF-DEF |
ABA-CDC-ABA-EFE-ABA-CDC-ABA-EFE | ABCD-DCCBBA-ABCD-DCCBBA |
DEFORMATION CONCEPT - VOIDS AND MASSES FINAL MODELPATTERNS VOIDS AND MASSES
A1INSTRUCTORS: TRAVIS BRIDGES | TOM COLLINS SPRING 2007
P.8
My analysis of this piece started with darkness through transformation into form and structure. I also saw how each layer of Albers’ piece was purposefully positioned to translate rhythm. After realizing the alternating rhythm of the piece I developed diagrams that revealed the voids and masses within it. I chose to work with one of my diagrams that best captures this alternating rhythm. The next step was to produce a bas-relief model study. In looking at my chosen diagram, I saw a floor plan. In this floor plan I wanted to explore the beauty of free forms.
SKETCHES, BAS-RELIEF MODELS & COLLAGES
So I used this floor plan as a base for my models. However, I wanted to eliminate the rigidity of the straight lines. To do this, I distorted the lines, and as a result created the free forms in the bas-relief. From the 2D bas-relief model study I went ahead and fully developed 3D model studies. With purity and beauty in mind, I was able to produce my final 3D model that shows mass against spaces. In conclusion, one can contract and filter old ideas to fit into our present time in relation to design and sometimes even promote ideas for the future.
DEFORMATION CONCEPT - HARDLINE
2D/3D TRANSFORMATION MIDTERM
A1INSTRUCTORS: TRAVIS BRIDGES | TOM COLLINS SPRING 2007 2D/3D TRANSFORMATION FINAL
The studio A1 final project was a continuation of the 2d|3d midterm project. This time around we were given a pre-determined site in which I was able to maneuver in any shape I wanted while respecting the site’s dimension constraints. My approach was to continue the deformation solution applied on the midterm phase of this project. Only now I applied to the land in the site and as a contrast I kept a very rectilinear building to host the art-piece. Part of this assignment was to display the Alber’s piece which I did very expressively, the reason being very simple. The Bauhaus School of Design and the Modern Movement as a whole were interested in social change and the democratization of social achievements . In my view, this project encompassed that idea, because the art would be exposed to everyone and not confined inside a particular place.
P.9
FINAL MODELHARDLINE AND CONCEPTUAL SKETCHES
3D MODEL
p. 10-13
A2INSTRUCTORS: scott culey | nathan allen FALL 2007 pathway PROJECT
The Pathway Project started with the reading of chapter 5 of Alice In Wonderland. The assignment was to read and interpret the chapter and then create something based on our understanding. After much struggle reading this chapter I developed feelings about it which I attempted to describe in words: confusion, delusional, metamorphic, mutant, surreal, superficial, fiction, fairytale and complexity. I created a painting in an attempt to convey those feelings. I wanted to capture the exact moment when an idea is born. Early on, we were also asked to create a collage to help us gather, organize and describe our thoughts on chapter 5.
P.10
COLLAGEPAINTING
The next step of the assignment was to interpret my reaction, which in my case was the painting. After carefully analyzing the painting, I found myself focusing my attention on its motion, which explicitly show sinuous curves at the end of each overlaying of color. For the following step we were asked to create two models of this interpretation of our original creation. This time I developed diagrams that focus on the painting’s variable and linear strokes.
A2INSTRUCTORS: scott culey | nathan allen FALL 2007 pathway PROJECT
Going forward we were asked to proceed with this study, however, now we had to use planar elements. With the planar elements, I was again seeing the motion of the sinuous curves in the painting. These became ramps in the landscape. Further along in the study I chose to work with the diagonal strokes seen on the last layer of covers in the painting which provide a more literal, visual observation.
P.11
PROGRESSION OF MODEL AND SKETCHES
SKETCHES PLANS, ELEVATIONS & SECTIONS FINAL MODEL
My final model successfully shows the progression from interpretation to realization then from analyzing to developing the finaL product. The path of discovery was my final concept, which came about through Alice’s confusion which led her to discover new things along her path.
A2INSTRUCTORS: scott culey | nathan allen FALL 2007 ritual | ceremony PROJECT
For the Ritual/Ceremony Project I was assigned to develop an olympic awards podium. I originally wanted to have a submarine-type stadium that would travel the world so games could be held in different locations as needed. I came up with that idea based on the shape of an extruded Olympic medal. My instructors were opposed to this idea and asked me to revise and refine my project and construct something of a smaller scale. I started to investigate the significance of the Olympic emblem, which signifies the unity of the world. It means continents, all countries, all people of the earth coming together to practice and be part of healthy, constructive competition. The design embodies the
P.12
COLLAGE & SKETCHES OF THE ORIGINAL IDEA, THE STADIUM
SKETCHES OF THE OLIVE TREE, A PAINTING I BASED ON A WREATH, SKETCHES AND MODEL OF THE PODIUM APPARATUS
continents within a greater circle which resembles the planet earth. This shows the unification of all earth’s inhabitants. Based on this concept of unity, I designed a podium, which reflects the overlapping rings of the emblem. In my further research of the original olympic ceremonies, I came across information on the significance of the olive wreath in the Olympic games. The Olive tree was viewed by the ancient Greeks as a symbol of abundance, glory and peace. Olive wreaths were used to crown the victors of friendly games and also the victors of bloody war, as emblems of benediction and purification.
A2INSTRUCTORS: scott culey | nathan allen FALL 2007 ritual | ceremony PROJECT
P.13
I decided that I wanted to include aspects of the olive wreath and tree in the award ceremony, as they played such an important role in the early games. I did so by designing a podium apparatus. My apparatus design is an attempt to not only resemble the olive tree, its leaves and its components but also to incorporate its sustenance and symbolism. I based it on the strong characteristics and the beauty of an olive tree.. The split trunks of the tree will hold a semicircular shape which signifies the wreath, sending a message to those who may experience it. The message is: the wreath and its significance depends on the powerful sustenance of its provider, the tree itself. In this combination, the users of this space would immediately conceptualize the importance of this ceremony.
PAINTING OF PODIUM AND APPARATUS FiINAL 3-DIMENSIONAL COMPUTER MODEL OF PODIUM AND APPARATUS FINAL MODEL
The 2 main aspects of my podium and apparatus are the Olympic emblem and the olive wreath. The three dimensional model shows the two “trunks” in the back and the “wreath” - which crowns the winners in the front. This version of the apparatus needed to be changed as it was too sterile and did not stay true to the essence of the tough, organic characteristics of the olive tree and wreath. I went back to a look which more closely resembled the tree and wreath. The final model was made of wire weaving in and out similar to the windy trunk of the olive tree.
3D APPARATUS TRAILS
p. 14-23
THE GLASS HOUSE | NEW CANNAN, CONNECTICUT, USA | 1949 | ARCHITECT - PHILIP JOHNSON
For this project I was assigned to reproduce plans, sections and elevations of Philip Johnson’s Glass House. I then investigated the site and its surrounding environment. Next we were asked to make various diagrams on our findings: the interior, the site, the site’s circulation and its architectural meaning. The most important of all my findings in this investigation was Philip Johnson himself. He was an interesting person trying to express his persona through architecture. In resume, the Glass House is a combination of many ideas. I discovered that the main Glass House concepts are derivative of Mr. Claude Nicholas Ledoux’s utopian ideas, which are: aesthetics rule over function and eclecticism. The house’s main design motif is derived from minimalist shapes developed by Supremacist artist Kashmir Malevich. The symmetry comes from Mies Van Der Rohe’s influence of aesthetical proportions pleasing to the human eye. The asymmetry is derived from the Athenian Acropolis. The circulation is derived from symmetrical systems found in the Baroque plan and also in the early modernists’ work. Other design features were consequently chosen by Philip’s lifestyle, personal influences and life experiences. I believe that the house is so very rectilinear because of his sexual preference. The key influence in the design of this house is Supremacism.
INSTRUCTORS: MATT MORONG | CHAUNCEY HERMAN SPRING 2008 GLASS HOUSE INTERVENTION PROJECTB1
P.14
THE GLASS HOUSE
WEEK 2 : THE HOUSE DIAGRAM | INTERIOR PERIMETERS IN RELATION TO EXTERIOR
VIEW NUMBER 3
VIEW NUMBER 4
VIEW NUMBER 2 VIEW NUMBER 5
VIEW NUMBER 1
SPACE DIAGRAM
WEEK 2 : THE HOUSE DIAGRAM | EXPLODED AXOM PARTS
WEST WALL
SOUTH WALL SLAB FOUNDATION
PRE-CAST CONCRETE STEPS
FLOOR PLAN
STRUCTURAL I-BEAMS
FLAT ROOF
NORTH WALL
CHIMNEY
EAST WALL
WEEK 1 : THE HOUSE INVESTIGATION |PLAN | SECTIONS | ELEVATIONS | PERSPECTIVE
PLAN
SECTION A
SECTION B
SOUTH ELEVATION
EAST ELEVATION
PERSPECTIVE
BUILDING - THE GLASS HOUSE | LOCATION - NEW CANNAN, CONNECTICUT, USA | YEAR - 1949 | ARCHITECT - PHILIP JOHNSON
WEEK 3 : THE ENVIRONMENT INVESTIGATION |SITE RELATIONSHIP DIAGRAM | INDOOR SPACE VS OUTDOOR SPACE
VOID
MASS
CIRCULATION
STRUCTURE
NATURAL RING
P.15
LAND DECLINE
WEEK 4 : SPACIAL SITE INVESTIGATION | IDENTIFY SPATIAL PERIMETERS AND THEIR RELATION TO THE OUTSIDE.
INDOOR | OUTDOORCONVERSATIONS
CIRCULAR EXTENSIONS=
OVERALL PLANAR AREA
IN PLAN
OVERALL PLANAR AREA IN SECTION
FOCAL POINT OF THE SITE = THE LAKE
WEEK 4 : SPACIAL SITE INVESTIGATION | PART II IDENTIFY SPATIAL PERIMETERS AND THEIR RELATION TO THE OUTSIDE.
After analyzing the circulation, the structure, the relationships between manmade structures and nature, the focal points of the site and the historical precedents Mr. Johnson was influenced by , I began my process of intervention. It began with the desire to replace the brick chimney with Chaux, because it is one of Ledoux’s preferred materials. Chaux is the white substance left after heating limestone used in making cement. Another reason I changed the material from brick to cement was for structural purposes. Form rules over function and I believe there is a function to the form itself. Forms are meant to bring humans spiritual relief or at least a sense of belonging. The rectilinear shape of the Glass House is austere, hard and lacks softness. The rectilinear man made shape of the house contrasts with the organic surroundings. I believe by reducing its angularity I developed a more harmonious relationship with the natural setting. I also started investigating the concepts involved in the glass house, mainly Suprematism and Minimalism.
INSTRUCTORS: MATT MORONG | CHAUNCEY HERMAN SPRING 2008 GLASS HOUSE INTERVENTION PROJECTB1
Palladian circulation EXTRUSION LEDOUX’S INSPIRATION
EXAMPLES OF KASIMIR MALEVICH SUPREMACIST PAINTINGS
P.16
PAINTINGS I CREATED BASED ON GLASS HOUSE CONCEPTS
WEEK 5 : SUPREMACIST PAINTINGS INVESTIGATION | RESEARCH LEDOUX INFLUENCE ON UTOPIAN THEORIES + SUPREMATIST PAINTINGS
In art, purity refers to the degree to which a color is free from being mixed with other colors, for example, lacking nothing essential to the whole. The whole can be perceived as beautiful therefore beauty is essential to a modernist composition based on Suprematism. Lastly, simplified forms such as squares and circles are representatives of purity. The circle resembles no boundaries; there is no end or start. It represents the whole and the whole is never-ending. It is complete. The whole is the greatest in importance, degree, significance, character or achievement. The whole is full or entire, brought to completeness or to perfection. I thought the circle was the most powerful form, so in turn I decided to use it for this project.
Suprematism is geometric abstract art, painting and sculpture that emphasize extreme simplification of form. Another example of simplification in art and architecture is Minimalism. Minimalism is the deletion or reduction of anything that isn’t essential, to have only what is necessary, and nothing more. Minimalists have ideas tied in with purity, which is another element of Suprematism, and humbleness.
INSTRUCTORS: MATT MORONG | CHAUNCEY HERMAN SPRING 2008 GLASS HOUSE INTERVENTION PROJECTB1
THE INTERVENTION
EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVE
SECTION DETAIL
FIREPLACE INTERVENTION PERSPECTIVE
EAST SECTION
INTERIORPERSPECTIVE
EAST ELEVATION
INTERVENTION TOP VIEW
TOP VIEW OF EXISTING
WEST RAMP
LOUNGE AREA
INDOOR BUSH
DINNING ROOM AREA
SOUTH RAMP
SCULPTURE
KITCHEN AREA
FIREPLACE
BATHROOM
EAST ENTRANCE
FLOOR PLAN
OFFICE
NORTH RAMP
BEDROOMART
INDOOR NATURAL RING
P.17
The whole is full and sonorous. A loop is a completed course of time. It represents the integrity of the wholeness of the circle, because like the circle it is complete, constant and undivided. Prior to my intervention all elements inside the space seemed to orbit the circular shape of the chimney. Now, all the elements belong to the whole. All elements do not exceed a certain height so there are clear views through the site (an idea pertaining to Acropolis). This aspect of the space did not need revision. I noticed that by having this house raised to a certain level on the horizon, it almost created a sensation of floatation, so I decided to increase that sensation by trying to hide the brick base elevation by creating an angle near the ground sort of resembling the shape of a saucer. The glass house is only a conceptual habitat, not a functional one. With that in mind we need to realize that the brick house, Johnson’s creation which is beside the glass house, is part of the glass house. By looking at Johnson’s decision it seems that he wanted to experience the site with one eye open and another closed. The geometry of my intervention works as planets orbiting the sun. The house is the sun and the people are the planets. The open eye is only limited by the brick house although the fence serves as a spacial warning in relation to the exterior. The final intervention is a correspondence pertaining to all aspects of human nature, as well as one’s physical, intellectual, and spiritual development.
FINAL WEEK : SUPREMATIST PAINTINGS LED THE FINAL INTERVENTION DESIGN TO EVOLVE INTO A RECIPROCAL LANGUAGE OF UTILITY AND FORM.
INSTRUCTORS: MATT MORONG | CHAUNCEY HERMAN SPRING 2008 GLASS HOUSE INTERVENTION PROJECTB1
The Boat House project was an intentional intervention on Boston’s Charles River. We were instructed to visit and document the location in order to develop the project based on our perceptions. Synthesis - The boat house project achieves human habitat enhancements by reconfiguring existing aspects of the site and composing new developments for the greater good.
P.18
SKETCHES
INITIAL PROGRAM - THE CHARLES FLOATING 3D ELEVATOR INITIAL MODEL - EXTERIOR TO RESEMBLE PADDLES SCIENTIFIC INVESTIGATION OF SOUND AND WATER PROPAGATIONVANTAGE POINTS AND SUN PATTERNNOISE LEVELS - BREAK DOWN
Analysis - After a period of investigation of the site I saw a lack of management of sound expelled from heavy traffic on Storrow Drive which contours at least 99% of the section studied of the park. So I decided to explore this idea and perceive a solution to this problem.
SKETCHES
INSTRUCTORS: MATT MORONG | CHAUNCEY HERMAN SPRING 2008 B1 THE BOAT HOUSE PROJECT
Concept - The concept is based on Isaac Newton’s discoveries on sound waves, where he studied how sound waves pass through a hole as an example and become more hollow creating “valleys” from one wave to the next. Based on these valleys I chose to mimic the sound waves derived from the source ( Storrow Drive ) passing through a “wall” with holes (The Esplanade) reaching the location (the Charles River) of my boathouse.
Design - My design is a descendent of the musical element called the triad.
EXISTING DECK
EXISTING ACCESSES
EXISTING PATH WAY
LOUD VIBRATION
SOFT VIBRATION
DISRUPTIVE ROAD NOISEPARK | LIFE ASPHALT | DEATH SONOROUS TRIAD CONCEPTSITE COMPLEXITY
INTERPRETATIONS + OBSERVATIONS:
Science - When subjected to 45 decibels (db) of noise, the average person cannot sleep. Hearing loss begins at 85 db. Prolonged exposure to noise ranging from 45 db to 85 db can cause lack of sleep, indigestion, heartburn, irritability, ulcers, high blood pressure and heart disease. One burst of noise, as from a passing truck, is known to alter endocrine, neurological and cardiovascular functions. Distance diminishes the effective decibel level reaching the ear. Thus moderate auto traffic at a distance of 100 ft (30 meters) rates about 50 decibels.
Sound movement - Sound can travel in a straight line of direction in the simplest situation, however sound waves also suffer reflections, bending and scattering in more complex cases.
INSTRUCTORS: MATT MORONG | CHAUNCEY HERMAN SPRING 2008 B1 THE BOAT HOUSE PROJECT
P.19
The triad is a group of three notes having a specific construction and relationship to one another. They are constructed on three consecutive lines or three consecutive spaces. Each member of the triad is separated by an interval of a third. The triad is composed of a root, third, and fifth. In my design the first line of walls (the walls closest to the road) relates to the root, the second wall to the third note, and the third wall to the fifth. The walls of the building go in opposite directions, generating a harmonious relationship also found in harmonics in musical terms. The frequency produced by the harmonic triad produces what is called the fundamental frequency, where a sound source is vibrating, reflecting, bending or scattering in halves, in other words producing an octave which relates to the symmetry used in the building. Lastly, the building is rotated 180 degrees opposed to the “receiving filtered valley waves from Storrow Drive” creating a silent shock reaction up to about 100 ft of its boundaries. Initially I wanted to provide an entire fluvial metro-type elevator that would allow visitors and residents of Boston to connect from the Museum of Science to Harvard and loop back to the other side of Mass Ave. My instructors thought my idea was too broad for this project and I had to work within the immediate location. I thought the building should be away from Sorrow as much as possible for sound purposes and I thought of four ways to accomplish it.
HARVARD
ZAKIM BRIDGE
STORROW LAGOON
M I T
BOSTON FINANCIAL BUSINESS DISTRICT
SITE ANALYZING | PROPOSED ANALYSIS
CONTINUOUS PATH ALIGNMENT WITH PRUDENTIAL AN INTERSECTION ADVANCING CITY GRID:
INSTRUCTORS: MATT MORONG | CHAUNCEY HERMAN SPRING 2008 B1 THE BOAT HOUSE PROJECT
P.20
P.21
PROPOSED SITE
COLLAGE
PROPOSED PLAN
SOUND ATMOSPHERE
DRAFT MODEL FINAL MODELTRIADE SECTION
I decided to incorporate the intersection idea with the alignment with the Prudential. The Prudential was important because to me it is the most iconic building in Boston.
INSTRUCTORS: MATT MORONG | CHAUNCEY HERMAN SPRING 2008 B1 THE BOAT HOUSE PROJECT
P.22
UNDERGROUND AND ROOF PLANS SOUTH ELEVATION FLOOR PLAN SECTION AND WEST ELEVATION
SKETCHES CHARCOAL PERSPECTIVE
INSTRUCTORS: MATT MORONG | CHAUNCEY HERMAN SPRING 2008 B1 THE BOAT HOUSE PROJECT
BOAT HOUSE PERSPECTIVE
P.23
INSTRUCTORS: MATT MORONG | CHAUNCEY HERMAN SPRING 2008 B1 THE BOAT HOUSE PROJECT
p. 24-40
P.24
B2INSTRUCTORS: MIKE PERHAM | SEOK FALL 2009 PROJECT 00 | TECTONICS
This project started with three different figures. We were supposed to interpret them and to work with them based on descriptive, functional and fundamentally tectonically sound reasons. Figure number 1 was a section illustration. Figure number 2 was a skeleton . Figure number 3 was an arrangement of insect wing x-rays in a rotation order.
I started with figure number 1 which was more rectilinear and easier to interpret. I dissected the main elements of the design in search of a reduction of members and then I saw an intersection-like shape. The section detail volume expressed an intersection of planar and cubic elements that is composed primarily around the square connector. This connected joinery intersection was my interpretation of this exploration. I eliminated this figure because I saw no challenge and it was too obvious.
PROJECT 00 | STUDIO B2
Author : Andre Vasconcelos
SECTION DETAIL X-RAY STRUCTURE NATURAL PATTERN
In search of basic elements I discovered this pattern in which I will investigate and develop.
The Xray figure is simply structural.it seems to me there are vertical and horizontal members connecting to an organic member to form a structure. this will be the basis of my concept.
The natural “wings” has a incredible s e n s e o f t r a n s p a r e n c y a n d movement. I will try to explore these ideas to form a concept.
1 2 3
1Saturday, February 14, 2009
PROJECT 00 | STUDIO B2
Author : Andre Vasconcelos
SECTION DETAIL X-RAY STRUCTURE NATURAL PATTERN
In search of basic elements I discovered this pattern in which I will investigate and develop.
The Xray figure is simply structural.it seems to me there are vertical and horizontal members connecting to an organic member to form a structure. this will be the basis of my concept.
The natural “wings” has a incredible s e n s e o f t r a n s p a r e n c y a n d movement. I will try to explore these ideas to form a concept.
1 2 3
1Saturday, February 14, 2009
PROJECT 00 | STUDIO B2
Author : Andre Vasconcelos
SECTION DETAIL X-RAY STRUCTURE NATURAL PATTERN
In search of basic elements I discovered this pattern in which I will investigate and develop.
The Xray figure is simply structural.it seems to me there are vertical and horizontal members connecting to an organic member to form a structure. this will be the basis of my concept.
The natural “wings” has a incredible s e n s e o f t r a n s p a r e n c y a n d movement. I will try to explore these ideas to form a concept.
1 2 3
1Saturday, February 14, 2009
SECTION DETAIL SKELETON X RAY WING VOLUMETRIC X RAY WINGVOLUMETRIC SKELETONVOLUMETRIC SECTION 3 SCALES SECTION 3 SCALES SKELETON 3 SCALES X RAY WING
SECTION DETAIL INTERPRETIVE MODEL X RAY WING INTERPRETIVE MODELSKELETON INTERPRETIVE MODEL
Number 2 was the skeleton. I made one set of interpretations deriving from object | complexity | pattern | volume. This figure is simply structural. It seems to me there were vertical and horizontal members connecting to an organic member to form a structure. This was the basis of my concept. The X-ray volumetric exploration was very informative, only after giving a third dimension to a planar figure I was able to discover other possibilities, At this point I integrated the structural characteristics of this figure and invested it in the natural pattern figure.
Number 3 was the Cell which I call the natural pattern, although it was intentionally arranged by someone. I also made one set of interpretations deriving from object | complexity | pattern | volume. The natural “wings” have an incredible sense of transparency and movement. I have tried to explore these ideas to form a concept. Conceptually the wings, when seen in volume form, can be interpreted as multiple objects. Once again I dissected the structural elements, then the translucent patterns. After those steps I integrated the constructional characteristics from the Xray figure and was then able to envision functional purposes for it. Conclusion : A progression of rational and intentional steps can lead us to something greater than life.
P.25
Conclusion: Adding a third dimension to a planar figure allows the viewer to interpret it differently.The Greek word tekton refers to the ability to construct something. One begins with a creation of a unit to an assembly of units. If one gives purpose to a unit, one can transform units unto architecture.
BONE STRUCTURE ABSTRACT PAINTING (X2) X RAY WING NATURAL PATTERN ABSTRACT PAINTING (X2)
B2INSTRUCTORS: MIKE PERHAM | SEOK FALL 2009 PROJECT 00 | TECTONICS
P.26
The tectonic models investigation led me to better understand the materials I was working with as well as an approximation to my final design proposition The tectonic investigation led me to develop a system partitioned in three components based on the skeleton developments. In addition this tectonic system was later integrated on the natural pattern developments which generated a very interesting final product.
SKELETON MODEL INVESTIGATION
X RAY WING NATURAL PATTERN MODEL INVESTIGATION
SKELETON SKETCH
X RAY WING NATURAL PATTERN SKETCH
B2INSTRUCTORS: MIKE PERHAM | SEOK FALL 2009 PROJECT 00 | TECTONICS
P.27
=
SKETCHES 3 DIFFERENT SCALES FINAL MODEL
TECTONIC ASSEMBLY TECTONIC SYSTEM
My final product was a device designed to aid singers during a recording session. The design would fit like a helmet and would benefit one’s studio performance by improving hearing. Looking at different scales this apparatus could be used as a prison cell, or at a much larger scale, as a full blown building.
B2INSTRUCTORS: MIKE PERHAM | SEOK FALL 2009 PROJECT 00 | TECTONICS
The Arnold Arboretum project started with a field trip. The experience was very compelling. Among a great variety of exotic trees and bushes the park in general is very big, well organized and clean. It makes you forget the city for a while. Within the Arboretum I noticed a rapid transit of people and animals. Some people seemed familiar with the site while others seemed like they had never been there. I also noticed that people seemed to have different interests which made the experience a little awkward. Some people just walked, while others jogged, skated, roller bladed or biked. There were also animals (dogs) that simply went as they pleased intertwining around the paths (accompanied by their owners, of course.) The assigned site is adjacent to Peters Hill, which is a focal point because it is an intersection of three paths. I found Peters Hill disproportional to the human scale. The site has some unresolved issues such as transit and size.
P.28
First week during my visits I noticed that people were moving at different speeds. The very slow explorer would almost hesitate before taking another step or photo. On the other hand, the fastest biker would cut an slow to moderate explorer off so quickly that if they came from behind in the same direction as an explorer it would suddenly create a drag noise right next to them. My design approach was to find order to these issues of size and traffic while minimizing the use of land for my architecture. The solution I found was to separate interest, the fast and the slow, the unfamiliar and the familiar. I attempted to address this issue through several different designs, before settling on the final design.
ARNOLD ARBORETUM SITE 3D ANALYTICAL SKETCH
B2INSTRUCTORS: MIKE PERHAM | SEOK FALL 2009 PROJECT 01 | Arnold Arboretum project
ANALYTICAL SKETCH
UNDERGROUND INTERSECTION
P.29
My first design attempt was to broaden Peter’s Hill intersection without damaging the integrity of the park. I intended to do this by recessing an underground facility contouring the path. This design would provide visitors with a sort of balcony on the rooftop of the facility. The facility would be split into halves connecting the underground. My instructors did not readily accept this idea, so I developed a new design solution. There would be a tunnel in the centerline of the path with the intention of separating the traffic patterns into a more organized system. This time around my instructors were starting to accept my intentions for the project, although they still were not satisfied. I took a step back into the tectonic patterns I had created in project 00 and I decided to literally incorporate it into this project. Once again, the proposed solution was not still settling well with my instructors. I decided to investigate a completely revolutionary concept that had the amenities broken up sparsely on the site with a number of smaller items. This solution came closer to meeting their expectations.
UNDERGROUND FACILITYFACILITY PLANSITE
CHAOS ORDER
SITE - TECTONIC COLLAGEFACILITY PLANSITE INTERSECTION - FACILITY DESIGN TO CONTOUR PATH
B2INSTRUCTORS: MIKE PERHAM | SEOK FALL 2009 PROJECT 01 | Arnold Arboretum project
P.30
SOLUTION: My final design not only separates the fast and the slow but also demonstrates the tectonics idea broken up into smaller portions. It ultimately manages the traffic issue with an overpass. The elevated pathways would allow the eyes of the visitors observing nature to be level with the trees thus providing the visitor with a more engaging experience. Their experience would be improved by a closer relation to the trees and park. The experience of all visitors: nature observers, bikers, and runners, among many others, would be improved with the new division of interests leading to more privacy and comfort of all traffic patterns.
FINAL MODEL3D MODEL
SKETCHES
B2INSTRUCTORS: MIKE PERHAM | SEOK FALL 2009 PROJECT 01 | Arnold Arboretum project
P.31
This project started when I received the coordinates from my instructors such as location, size and duration of the project. My initial approach included various site visits for documentation, in which I noted existing elevations, setbacks, tree patterns, traffic issues, etc. My findings were helpful: I saw a place submerged in the sublime.There is a sense of awe in the look and feel of this part of Boston’s Chinatown. It feels obscure and looks random. My analysis incorporated current social and economical census data of the city of Boston in comparison to Chinatown’s. Finally, a short investigation on Chinatown’s history and my findings were:
Reproach of other local ethnic immigrant groups from the past.
Unequal social and financial status per capita when compared to the average Bostonian.
The families living in Chinatown walks on average twice as much as the average family in Boston’s metropolitan area.
The average Bostonian drives on average twice as much as the average person from Chinatown
Visuals - Chinatown looks horizontal when compared to the local financial district in Boston. Also, the financial district looks colder and less warm than the predominant brick in Chinatown.
B2INSTRUCTORS: MIKE PERHAM | SEOK FALL 2009 PROJECT 02 | CHINATOWN PROJECT
HISTORICAL TIMELINE PRECEDENTS & WEALTH DISTRIBUTION
PROJECT SYNTHESIS - After interpreting all my studies I made the design decision to respond to some of the issues found in my studies. My design decisions were to interlock, to integrate and to create a mysterious atmosphere to reflect my first subliminal perceptions.
Design approach - Step 1: divide site in equal parts. Step 2: Search for a mathematical order of proportions. Step 3: Subdivide the order of proportions into equal parts. Step 4. Separate the order of proportions in the center to design distribution. Step 5 (final step): to transfer all program assignment information given by instructors.
URBAN ANALYSIS INTERLOCK CONCEPT | INTEGRATION URBAN PROGRAM
BUILDING PROGRAM SKIN STUDY
P.32
B2INSTRUCTORS: MIKE PERHAM | SEOK FALL 2009 PROJECT 02 | CHINATOWN PROJECT
P.33
TRIPARTITE PROGRAMATIC BUILDING CENTRAL ARTERY PROGRAM - INTERLOCK CHINATOWN AND BOSTON REDESIGNED CIRCULATION
FRONT LATERAL 1
GROUND LEVEL LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3
LATERAL 2 BACK
My instructors challenged me to resolve the program differently and I did. The prior program revolved around the central grid, so I developed a new program around the optimal circulation of the building, an idea received well by my peers.
B2INSTRUCTORS: MIKE PERHAM | SEOK FALL 2009 PROJECT 02 | CHINATOWN PROJECT
Architecturally we were asked to bring our tectonic developments from project 00 and 01 consequentially into this project. With the interior program being finite I began to analyze the skin of the building in ways that expressed my sentiments. For example, the interlocking, the integration, the aesthetic feel of sublimity and the tripartite resolution are all elements legible to the exterior program. My design perimeters were;
1 To interlock the financial district and Chinatown; -By creating a space for activities such as finance, theater, artist studios, art galleries, a cafe, etc...
2 To integrate the walkability factor of the locals as well as visitors and neighboring districts; - By creating a path that travels through the exterior of the building connecting both Hudson street and J F Fitzgerald Road.
3 To design an interior program that literally responds to exterior relationships. I organized the activities of the interior of the building to respond to the exterior environment. Then I made each facade legible from the exterior. I organized the activities of the building, for example, making the façade of the building more active to respond to the activity of the street as opposed to a less active side of the building adjacent to the Jiznga restaurant. This way the building would be readable from the exterior as well.
4 The overall design coupled with my tectonics would evoke a sense of awe and obscurity that imminently relates to my impressions of the site. I projected regularity of shapes instead of a symmetrical composition and odd compositions of masses and voids that speak of my theory tectonically.
My aim was to create the sublime in a built form.
P.34
INITIAL SKETCH TECTONIC DEFINITION TECTONIC DEFINITION ASSEMBLY 3D ASSEMBLY
B2INSTRUCTORS: MIKE PERHAM | SEOK FALL 2009 PROJECT 02 | CHINATOWN PROJECT
P.35
TECTONIC EVOLUTION
SKIN TRIAL - EXTERIOR RESPONSIVENESS
My instructors were pushing me to go beyond my initial developments so I did. After bringing to class my skin module model, they asked me to work with my concepts and explore new ways of constructibility. I spent a week trying to push myself to go beyond these boundaries and I figured how my original tectonic was brought up from project 00 and how it had developed as I continued to respond to my instructors and my own ideas for this project.
I worked on a trial for a building envelope (skin) which was well received in class, however I did not stop there. Indeed I created an entire dynamic facade for my interior program.
SKIN MODULE MODEL
B2INSTRUCTORS: MIKE PERHAM | SEOK FALL 2009 PROJECT 02 | CHINATOWN PROJECT
P.36
FINAL TECTONIC DEVELOPMENT
1. 2 3
FINAL TECTONIC PRODUCT
This dynamic facade was a big step in my view to where I wanted to bring this project. My instructors although well receptive of my interlocking concept as well as my new developments still asked me to improve my building’s skin to make a clearer statement on all façades. I took two more steps to find what I thought I was looking for. I brought the tectonics to my interlocking concept and then I sharpened it by minimizing the structure and maximizing the functionality of the building.
B2INSTRUCTORS: MIKE PERHAM | SEOK FALL 2009 PROJECT 02 | CHINATOWN PROJECT
After interplaying all my concepts I came to this modular design that incorporated my interlocking tripartite facade.
P.37
ROOFTOP
3RD LEVEL 1ST LEVEL
GROUND LEVEL2ND LEVEL FLOOR PLANSMODULAR BUILDING ENVELOPE
B2INSTRUCTORS: MIKE PERHAM | SEOK FALL 2009 PROJECT 02 | CHINATOWN PROJECT
FINAL DESIGN - ELEVATIONS
HUDSON PERSPECTIVEJFF ROAD PERSPECTIVE
HUDSON ELEVATIONJFF ROAD ELEVATION
BACK ELEVATIONFRONT ELEVATION
HUDSON BACK ELEVATION PERSPECTIVEJFF ROAD BACK ELEVATION PERSPECTIVE
P.38
SECTIONSMODEL
OVERVIEW
HUDSON SECTION
J. F. F. ROAD SECTION
3D SECTION
B2INSTRUCTORS: MIKE PERHAM | SEOK FALL 2009 PROJECT 02 | CHINATOWN PROJECT
OFFICEARTISTS’ LOFTP.39
ARENA
Building interior program details were
Ground1. entrance
2.admissions
3.gallery loft
4.WC (man-woman)
5.mechanical room
6.storage room
7.fire scape
1st level1. lounge
2.loft cafe area
3.performance arena
4.theater
5.gallery loft
2nd level1. main circulation
2.artist loft area 1
3.artist loft area 2
4.artist loft area 3
3rd level1. lounge area
2.office manager room
3.associates office
4.kitchen
B2INSTRUCTORS: MIKE PERHAM | SEOK FALL 2009 PROJECT 02 | CHINATOWN PROJECT
FINAL PERSPECTIVE
P.40
B2INSTRUCTORS: MIKE PERHAM | SEOK FALL 2009 PROJECT 02 | CHINATOWN PROJECT
p. 41-66
WORKSUPERVISOR | Ronald Jackson 2007 - 2008 4G TELECOM EXPANSION PROJECT
P.41
JOB DESCRIPTION : INTERPRET SITE SKETCHES AND TRANSLATE THEM INTO A DIGITAL FORMAT [CAD] ARCHITECTURAL DESKTOP
My first architectural / engineering office experience was very rewarding. Working at Bay State Design helped me understand important trades in the architectural profession. One such trade was working in a team of professionals. My participation was in the team of engineers to help them translate their engineering solutions into a graphical representation. That was a good challenge for my level of development in the profession. I worked at Bay State Design, Inc. from early 2007 until the beginning of the financial recession early 2008. I was an integral part in a draftsman’s team composed to produce an entire corporate expansion.
P.42
JOB DESCRIPTION : INTERPRET SITE SKETCHES AND TRANSLATE THEM INTO A DIGITAL FORMAT [CAD] ARCHITECTURAL DESKTOP
WORKSUPERVISOR | Ronald Jackson 2007 - 2008 4G TELECOM EXPANSION PROJECT
INDEPENDENT PRACTICESUPERVISOR | KENNETH SAVOIE 2009-2011 BASS HOUSE PROJECT
NARRATIVE | Since beginning work on this house in November of 2008, I have been developing new skills as well as improving old ones. These skills relate to both carpentry and architecture. I obtained and improved carpentry skills during a series of activities that took place in this house, some of which are the restoration of hard wood flooring in the kitchen, installation of a casement window, tiling, and the demolition and construction of walls all the way from studs to plaster. As an architect I planned the layout for the renovation in both the kitchen and bathroom, and later I planned a complete redesign of this house including a second floor addition. This house is the summer home of Mr. & Mrs. Read. They share a passion for Victorian style houses, however, for their summer house they wanted something functional and exiting. In their second home they wanted to expand functionality and improve their vantage points. While the Cape style home is common in the immediate neighborhood, just several blocks away on Bass Rocks there are extraordinary houses with exponential architectural value. The budget for this project was extremely limited and I had to come up with creative ideas in order to overcome monetary constraints. This project took me to a new understanding of architecture. I have had the incredible opportunity to have open minded clients that respected my design decisions and that helped me achieve success without external interference.
82 Bass Avenue is a small Cape Style house located two blocks west of Good Harbor Beach in Gloucester, MA. The house sits on a generous lot west of Cape Ann Coffees, the local coffee shop. To the North lies a small shopping complex that includes a CVS Pharmacy as well as a Super Stop & Shop. To the west of 82 Bass Avenue there is residential dwelling and to the south is Bass Avenue itself which consists of residences and small local businesses.
Start | Since beginning work on this house in November of 2008, I have been developing new skills as well as improving old ones. These skills relate to both carpentry and architecture. I obtained and improved carpentry skills during a series of activities that took place in this house, some of which are the restoration of hard wood flooring in the kitchen, installation of a casement window, tiling, and the demolition and construction of walls all the way from studs to plaster. As an architect I planned the layout plans for the renovation in both the kitchen and bathroom, and later I planned a complete redesign of this house including a second floor addition.
ORIGINAL SOUTH FACADE
AESTHETICSVOLUMES HEIGHT CONSTRAINTSOLAR GAIN | INHIBITION SOUND CONTROL
Design Initiation
This house is the summer home of Mr. & Mrs. Read. They share a passion for Victorian style houses, however, for their summer house they wanted something functional and exiting. In their second home they wanted to expand it’s functionality and improve their vantage points. While the Cape style home is common in the immediate neighborhood, just several blocks away on Bass Rocks, there are extraordinary houses with exponential architectural value. The budget for this project is extremely limited and I had to come up with creative ideas in order to overcome monetary constraints.
Clients : Mr. Michael & Misses Kathleen Read Date : July 2009 To PresentLocation : 82 Bass ave., Gloucester, Ma. 01930 Architect : Andre VasconcelosJob description : Beach House renovation | addition
82 B
ASS
AV
E.
MARSH LAND
BUSINESS
SITE
RESIDENCES
GO
OD
HA
RBO
R B
EAC
H
PAVEMENT
:: PR
OJE
CT T
ITLE
::
Com
pany
Nam
e :
: S
tree
t Nam
e, S
uite
Num
ber :
: C
ity, St
ate
Zip
Code
::
M
ONTH
DD, YY
YY ::
01
00
01
04
02
N
:: P
ROJECT TIT
LE ::
Company N
ame :
: Stre
et Nam
e, Suite
Number ::
City, S
tate Zip Code :
: MONTH DD, Y
YYY ::
01
00
01
04
02
N
82 Bass Avenue is a small Cape Style house located two blocks west of Good Harbor Beach in Gloucester, MA. The house sits on a generous lot west of Cape Ann Coffees, the local coffee shop. To the North lies a small shopping complex that includes a CVS Pharmacy as well as a Super Stop & Shop. To the west of 82 Bass Avenue there is residential dwelling and to the south is Bass Avenue itself which consists of residences and small local businesses.
This project is taking me to a new understanding of architecture. I have had the incredible opportunity to have open minded clients that respected my design decisions and that helped me achieve success without external interference.
SITE
STAGE 2
STAGE 3
Schemes
STAGE 1
BASS FISH
JOB DESCRIPTION : BEACH HOUSE RENOVATION-ADDITION | LOCATION : GLOUCESTER MA | DATE JULY 2009 TO PRESENT | ARCHITECT : ANDRE VASCONCELOS | CLIENT : MR. READ & FAMILY
P.43
LOCAL SATELLITE IMAGE SITE SATELLITE IMAGE SITE ZONING
82 BASS AVE - FRONT - SOUTH EAST
1Wednesday, October 29, 2008
ORIGINAL HOUSE
INSPIRATION SCHEME 1 SCHEME 2 SCHEME 3 SCHEME 4 program
P.44
THE BASS FISH
1ST FLOOR = PUBLIC
2ND FLOOR = PRIVATE
INDEPENDENT PRACTICESUPERVISOR | KENNETH SAVOIE 2009-2011 BASS HOUSE PROJECT
SOLAR GAIN | INHIBITION VOLUMES HEIGHT CONSTRAINT SOUND CONTROL AESTHETICS EXPLODED AXON.
P.45
Ç√
MARKET RESEARCH
SITE INVESTIGATION
PLANNING
DESIGNING
MAKING CONNECTIONS
MAKING DECISIONS
COMMUNICATING
COORDINATING
FOLLOW-UP
knowledgeNotable Learning Outcomes | Establishing credibility with the client through research and analysis of the local real estate market to establish budget guidelines that are in line with market conditions and property values. * Applying knowledge and understanding of site considerations affecting building orientation and envelope design.
* Engaging with client to develop clear design guidelines and renovation objectives. * Generating close working relationship with municipal building officials, contractor and subcontractors. * Increasing effective communication skills with all project stakeholders
* Managing construction, project budget and requisition process.
The Bass House project strived to be sustainable in some aspects, for example, the roof type, windows and doors, heating and cooling, I have selected are all energy efficient . The framing / structure of the addition was 70% assembled with engineered lumber, 60% of all insulation in the building is (R40) to help reduce temperature swings considerably, the insulation used was soy foam. The overall house design uses a passive solar design which helps with energy loss and the roof top manages the water runoff back in the yard by the omission of traditional gutters with help of an extended eave that pushes the water out to the yard.
INDEPENDENT PRACTICESUPERVISOR | KENNETH SAVOIE 2009-2011 BASS HOUSE PROJECT
Financial management was critical at times, we went $60,000 over budget due to change orders, unexpected construction costs and construction delays. Today this property has over a quarter of million dollars invested in it and another quarter million dollars for home acquisition, giving us a total investment of $600,000. The house market has seen a substantial downturn in the United States. However, there are multiple multimillion dollar houses in a quarter mile radius from our location. Overall this journey was rewarding to say the least.
INDEPENDENT PRACTICESUPERVISOR | KENNETH SAVOIE 2009-2011 BASS HOUSE PROJECT
P.46
ThE BASS HOUSE FINAL PERSPECTIVE
P.47
INDEPENDENT PRACTICESUPERVISOR | KENNETH SAVOIE 2009-2011 BASS HOUSE PROJECT
CONSTRUCTION STARTS DAY 1 DAY 2 DAY 3 DAY 4 DAY 5 DAY 6
DAY 7 DAY 8 DAY 9 DAY 10 DAY 11 DAY 12 DAY 13
DAY 14 DAY 15 DAY 16 DAY 17 DAY 18 DAY 19 DAY 20
DAY 21 DAY 22 DAY 23 DAY 24 DAY 25 DAY 26 DAY 27
A time line period of construction...
INDEPENDENT PRACTICESUPERVISOR | KENNETH SAVOIE 2009-2011 BASS HOUSE PROJECT
P.48
month 2 month 3 month 4
month 5 month 6 month 7
A time line period of construction… progression from the 2nd month to the 7th month.
INDEPENDENT PRACTICESUPERVISOR | KENNETH SAVOIE 2009-2011 BASS HOUSE PROJECT
P.49
A time line period of construction… progression from the 7th month to beginning of summer 2011.
interior under construction interior - first floor interior - second floor
EXTERIOR 1 - southwest EXTERIOR 2 - detail EXTERIOR 3 - northeast
INDEPENDENT PRACTICESUPERVISOR | KENNETH SAVOIE 2009-2011 BASS HOUSE PROJECT
P.50
INDEPENDENT PRACTICESUPERVISOR | DIGIORGIO + BRACCIOTI 2010 - 2011 STONEHAM HOUSE PROJECT
The Stoneham project is a single family residence designed for the Leone’s family. This project came about by the Leone’s visit to Good Harbor beach in the summer of 2010. They saw my work; the Bass house, during our conversation I introduced the idea of letting me design a house for them. Interestingly, the Leone’s were looking to purchase a house in the suburbs of Boston for about a year and according to them, they were somewhat disappointed. The Leone’s were skeptical of my idea at first but later decided to purchase land and to custom build a home for themselves. As an ideal financial and practical solution, they purchased land and contact me to help design their home. As we started discussing the design expectations and possibilities I introduced my personal mentor from the Boston Architectural College. Ken Savoie to professionally assist them instead. A little time went by and the Leone’s contacted me to take charge on the design. Following this event I asked Len Charney. The head of the Practice Department at the Boston Architectural College for help. I was looking for professional assistance. Len then teamed up Peter Braccioti and Dom DiGiorgio both members of Practice. We soon started a proficient team. Design-wise I had been studying the site and I had already developed three concepts. These concepts were later analyzed by the team and I was asked to choose one concept I liked the most. I thought each concept had a strong point about them so I came to the idea of combining all three concepts into one. This concept I called the HYBRID CONCEPT.
JOB DESCRIPTION : SINGLE FAMILY - NEW CONSTRUCTION HOUSE | LOCATION : STONEHAM MA | DATE JULY 2010 TO PRESENT | ARCHITECT : ANDRE VASCONCELOS | CLIENT : LEONE & FAMILY
SITE
SCHIAPPA CR.
CONSERVATION LAND
CHUCK FAIA , CIVIL ENGINEER PREPARED
TOPOGRAPHIC DRAWING FOR LAND ACQUISITION WITH
FOOTPRINT PROPOSAL.
TOPOGRAPHIC - ORIGINAL FOOT PRINT LAYOUT LOCAL SATELLITE IMAGE
P.51
P.45
ZONING ORIENTATION
INDEPENDENT PRACTICESUPERVISOR | DIGIORGIO + BRACCIOTI 2010 - 2011 STONEHAM HOUSE PROJECT
LEDGE CONSTRAINT SUN PATTERN SITE CLUSTER
P.52
CONCEPTS: I II & III
CONCEPT ITHE INTENTION WAS TO PROVIDE A MORE RECTANGULAR DESIGN - TO REDUCE CONSTRUCTION COST AND TO RELATE TO CLIENT’S INTEREST FOR A COLONIAL APPEARANCE HOME
CONCEPT IIITHE INTENTION WAS TO PROVIDE A MORE DYNAMIC DESIGN - TO ADD ARCHITECTURAL VALUE
CONCEPT IITHE INTENTION WAS TO PROVIDE A MORE FLEXIBLE DESIGN - TO INCORPORATE AN ARCHITECTURAL LANGUAGE WITH THE LAND
INDEPENDENT PRACTICESUPERVISOR | DIGIORGIO + BRACCIOTI 2010 - 2011 STONEHAM HOUSE PROJECT
P.53
P.54
CONCEPTS: I II & III
CONCEPT I42* COUNTER CLOCKWISE
1,250 sq. f. FIRST FLOOR
CONCEPT II25* COUNTER CLOCKWISE
1,400 sq. f. FIRST FLOOR
CONCEPT III15* COUNTER CLOCKWISE
1,600 sq. f. FIRST FLOOR
INDEPENDENT PRACTICESUPERVISOR | DIGIORGIO + BRACCIOTI 2010 - 2011 STONEHAM HOUSE PROJECT
Our design team evaluated good aspects of the three design concepts and we pushed forward a new design that encompasses ideas from tree concepts in which I called the HYBRID CONCEPT.
P.55
HYBRID CONCEPT PLAN HYBRID PLAN - CONCEPTUAL STAGE
INDEPENDENT PRACTICESUPERVISOR | DIGIORGIO + BRACCIOTI 2010 - 2011 STONEHAM HOUSE PROJECT
HYBRID CONCEPTDIGIORGIO | BRACCIOTTI & VASCONCELOS
PROPOSED FOOT PRINT LAYOUT SKETCH - THE HYBRID CONCEPT PLAN PROPOSED FOOT PRINT LAYOUT
TOTAL LIVING SPACE 2,625 SQ. F.
00
HYBRID CONCEPTPETER | DOM & ANDRE
TOTAL LIVING SPACE 2523
TOTAL LIVING SPACE 2,523 SQ. F.
HYBRID CONCEPT
Our architectural team responded diligently to the family’s needs based on a family’s wish list. Our design team had major difficulties with conservation setbacks and an extensive ledge in a very prominent area in the front yard. We carefully analyzed the situation in order to properly establish an interior program that was expected by the Leone’s. Based on a series of circumstances and rational decision making, we made room even for the clients emotional perceptions of themselves.
P.56
INDEPENDENT PRACTICESUPERVISOR | DIGIORGIO + BRACCIOTI 2010 - 2011 STONEHAM HOUSE PROJECT
00
HYBRID CONCEPTPETER | DOM & ANDRE
TOTAL LIVING SPACE 2523
PROPOSED BUILDING PROGRAM PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN
DR
AW
N B
YAN
DR
E VASC
ON
CEL
OS
RE
-IS
SU
E08
.09.
08
ISS
UE
08.0
8.08
CLI
EN
TM
R.
MS.
LEO
NE
25 C
LEVEL
AN
D A
VE.
EV
ERET
T, M
A,
0214
9 PH
ON
E: 6
17 3
1227
40
IND
EP
EN
DE
NT
PR
AC
TIC
EBO
STO
N A
RC
HIT
ECTU
RAL
CO
LLEG
E U
ND
ER S
UPE
RVIS
ION
OF
FACU
LTY
PR
OJE
CT
CO
NTE
MPO
RARY
SIN
GLE
FAM
ILY
HO
ME
PR
OJE
CT
NO
.24
5.17
0
A
DE
SC
RIP
TIO
NFI
RST
FLO
OR P
LAN
GREAT ROOM295 F!
KITCHEN300 F!
DRIVEWAY
D
D
NOTE:36" FIRE PROOF STEEL DOORREQUIRED
817
E0044
SMOKE DETECTOR
& CO2 DETECTOR
H. DETECTOR
H. DETECTOR
W
W
D
D
MULTI-ROOM130 F!
OFFICE100 F!
FOYER180 F!
BATH40 F!
D
D
TWO CAR GARAGE545 F!
NOTE:M08 VSE VELUX SKYLIGHTTOTAL OF (2)
W W
W
W
W
W W W MARVIN ULTREX45 DEGREE DOUBLEHUNG BAYS
W W W
FIRST FLOOR PLANScale: 1/4" : 1' - 0'
A2
DECK475 F!
DINNING182 F!
22' 0"
35' 6
"18
' 6"
8' 0
"
7' 6"8' 0"
10' 0
"10
' 0"
26' 9"
18' 0
"
4' 10"
11"
26' 0
"
5' 0
"
6' 0
"
20' 6
"
10' 5" 5' 0"
7' 0
"5'
6"
3' 0"
7' 6
"
11' 6"
11' 6
"
19' 6"
15' 0
"
14' 3"
28' 4" 12' 0"
8' 0
"20
' 6"
11' 6" 5' 6" 5' 6"10' 0"
27' 3"
6' 6"6' 6"4' 6"6' 0"
14' 0
"
62' 0
"
67' 9"
28' 0"
4' 9"
26' 8"
4' 10"
28' 6"
02
WINDOW SCHEDULE
DOOR SCHEDULE
ROUGH SIZE UNIT SIZE
D
10'W X 8'H 9' 11 1/2" X 89 1/2"
D 61b CLOPAY GARAGE DOOR
STONEHAM FIRE DTP.
H. DETECTOR TOTAL OF (2)
TOTAL OF (2)SMOKE
DETECTOR
TOTAL OF (1)CARBON MONOXIDE
GENERAL NOTES
W 45 DEGREE DOUBLE HUNG BAYS
4' 6"
3' 0
"
3' 6
"3'
10"
2' 6
"3'
2"
2' 6
"2'
6"
2' 6" 2' 6"
13' 3"
NOTE: ALL WINDOWS MUST LINE-UP
3' 8"
11' 0
"7'
0"
4' 0
"
NOTE:LAND LEVEL SPLIT 4F HEIGHTROSE BUSHES OR DWARFAUSTRIAN PINES REQUIREDIN ADDITION TO LANDSCAPING
LAWN AREA
LEDGE AREA
D 61b
D 61b
3' 6
"
LAUNDRY 60 F!
N
W W
MARVIN INTEGRITY DOUBLE HUNG (WOOD ULTREX WINDOWS)
MARVIN INTEGRITY FRENCH DOORS (WOOD ULTREX DOOR)
3' 0 1/2"W X 4' 0 1/4"H
W
2' 11 1/2"W X 3' 11 1/4"H
ITDH3648 TOTAL OF (1)
3' 0 1/2"W X 6' 4 1/2"H
W
2' 11 1/2"W X 6' 3 3/4"H
ITDH3676 TOTAL OF (22)
W ITDHT3616T TOTAL OF (16)
NOTE: TRANSOMS COMBINATION
3' 0 1/2"W X 1' 4 1/4"H
3' 0"W X 1' 4"H
TOTAL OF (1)
6' 6 19/32"W X 6' 5 11/16"H
SAMEW W W
W
W
W
ITDH3676ITDHT3616T
THERMA-TRU FIBER CLASSIC MAHOGANY
7' 5"
32' 6"
59' 9"
3' 0"W X 6' 8"H
2' 11 1/2"W X 6' 7 1/2"H
IIFD30 65XR
TOTAL OF (22)
ROUGH SIZE UNIT SIZE
6' W X 6' 8"H 5' 11"W X 6' 7 1/2"H
D IOFD6065XXL
TOTAL OF (2)
IOFD6065XXL
15' 3"
IOFD6065XXL
9' 6
"3'
0"
3' 6"
ROUGH SIZE UNIT SIZE
TOTAL OF (2)
35 1/2"W X 79 1/2"H36"W X 80"H
D E0044interior door
35 1/2"W X 79 1/2"H36"W X 80"H
D 817fiberglass ext.
TOTAL OF (2)
TOTAL OF (2)
E0044D
D 817
VENT
3' 0"3' 0"3' 0"
3' 0"
17' 9"
2' 0
"
3' 0"3' 0"3' 0"
3' 0
"3'
0"
3' 0
"3'
0"
W W
3' 0" 3' 0" 3' 0" 3' 0" 3' 0" 3' 0"
3' 0" 3' 0" 3' 0"
4' 6"
E0044
GENERAL CONTRACTOR
NOTE: ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE PERFORMED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITIONS OF THE FOLLOWING CODES AS ADOPTED BY THE LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES.
NOTE: ALL OPENINGS MUST BE CHECKED PRE-ORDERING WINDOWS AND DOORS, BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SAME.
3' 6"11' 6"
3' 0
"3'
0"
3' 0
"
21' 0"
PAVERS140 F!
STORAGE
42" RAILING
ITDH3676ITDHT3616T
ITDH3676ITDHT3616T
ITDH3676ITDHT3616T
ITDH3676ITDHT3616T
ITDH3676ITDHT3616T
ITDH3676ITDHT3616T
ITDH3676ITDHT3616T
ITDH3676ITDHT3616T
ITDH3676ITDHT3616T
ITDH3676ITDHT3616T
ITDH3676ITDHT3616T
ITDH3676ITDHT3616T
ITDH3676ITDHT3616T
ITDH3676ITDHT3616T
ITDH3676ITDHT3616T
ITDH3676
ITDH3676
ITDH3676
ITDH3676
ITDH3676
ITDH3676
NOTE: FRAMING DESIGN CALLS FOR NOMINAL:
2 X 6 WALLS, 12" DEPTH LVL ALL HEADERS, 12" TJI FLOOR JOISTS, 12" DEPTH DOUBLED LVL BEAMS,1/2" STRUCTURAL PLYWOOD UNDERFLOOR
GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY AND INSTALL ALL BEAMS AND FLOOR JOISTS ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS AND ALL APPLICABLE BUILDING CODES
GAS VENTLESS FIREPLACE
8' 0
"
12' 6
"3'
6"
MUDROOM + STR.107 F!
6' 0
"
GENERAL NOTES
DR
AW
N B
YAN
DR
E VASC
ON
CEL
OS
RE
-IS
SU
E08
.09.
08
ISS
UE
08.0
8.08
CLI
EN
TM
R.
MS.
LEO
NE
25 C
LEVEL
AN
D A
VE.
EV
ERET
T, M
A,
0214
9 PH
ON
E: 6
17 3
1227
40
IND
EP
EN
DE
NT
PR
AC
TIC
EBO
STO
N A
RC
HIT
ECTU
RAL
CO
LLEG
E U
ND
ER S
UPE
RVIS
ION
OF
FACU
LTY
PR
OJE
CT
CO
NTE
MPO
RARY
SIN
GLE
FAM
ILY
HO
ME
PR
OJE
CT
NO
.24
5.17
0
A
DE
SC
RIP
TIO
NSEC
ON
D F
LOO
R P
LAN
3' 0"
NOTE:PULL-DOWN ACCESS TO ATTIC (TYP.)
9' 0"
SECOND FLOOR PLANScale: 1/4" : 1' - 0'
A3
34' 0"
SMOKE DETECTOR
10' 0
"
38' 6
"
14' 5"
21' 0
"4'
0"
14' 5"
22' 0
"3'
6"
4' 6
"
5' 0"
8' 0
"
5' 6"1' 9"3' 0"6"3' 0"1' 9"5' 6"13' 0"
24' 6
"
38' 6
"
03
WINDOW SCHEDULE
DOOR SCHEDULE
31 1/2"W X 79 1/2"H32"W X 80"H
D CLOSET DOOR
TOTAL OF (5)
35 1/2"W X 79 1/2"H36"W X 80"H
D E0044 TOTAL OF (5)
STONEHAM FIRE DTP.
H. DETECTOR TOTAL OF (1)
TOTAL OF (3)SMOKE
DETECTOR
CARBON MONOXIDE
GENERAL NOTES
NOTE: FRAMING DESIGN CALLS FOR NOMINAL:
2 X 6 WALLS, 12" DEPTH LVL ALL HEADERS, 12" TJI FLOOR JOISTS, 12" DEPTH DOUBLED LVL BEAMS,1/2" STRUCTURAL PLYWOOD UNDERFLOOR
GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL BEAM AND JOISTS SIZES, PROVIDE BEAM CALCULATIONS TO BUILDING INSPECTOR AND INSTALL ALL BEAMS AND FLOOR JOISTS ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS AND ALL APPLICABLE BUILDING CODES
SMOKE DETECTOR
10' 5
"
SMOKE DETECTOR
14' 11"
17' 6"
17' 6"
11' 6
"11
' 6"
9' 0
"
4' 0"
3' 0"
3' 0"
12' 0
"
7' 6"
2' 6"
3' 0
"
3' 0
"
3' 0
"3'
0"
3' 0
"
5' 6
"3'
6"
5' 8
"5'
6"
3' 6
"
3' 6
"
15' 6
"
11' 1
1"
11' 5
"
W W W
W PICT.
W
D E0044
D E0044
D E0044
D E0044
GARAGEROOFTOP
KITCHENROOFTOP
3' 0"
5' 5
"7'
1"
6' 0
"
1' 8
"
7' 1" 5' 2"
NOTE:M08 VSE VELUX SKYLIGHTTOTAL OF (2)
VENT
GUTTER
48' 11"
15' 0"
GUTTER
12' 4"
ROUGH SIZE UNIT SIZE
W PICTUREFOYER WINDOW
NOTE: ALL WINDOWS MUST LINE-UP
MARVIN INTEGRITY DOUBLE HUNG (WOOD ULTREX WINDOWS)
3' 0 1/2"W X 4' 0 1/4"H
W
2' 11 1/2"W X 3' 11 1/4"H
ITDH3648 TOTAL OF (16)
TOTAL OF (2)
3' 0 1/2"W X 6' 5 11/16"H
SAME
TOTAL OF (1)
ROUGH SIZE UNIT SIZE
ITDH3648
ITDH3648
ITDH3648
W ITDH3648
W ITDH3648
W ITDH3648
W ITDH3648
W ITDH3648
W ITDH3648
W ITDH3648
W ITDH3648
W ITDH3648
W ITDH3648
1' 10 1/2"W X 3' 0 1/4"H
W
1' 9 1/2"W X 2' 11 3/4"H
ITDH2236MASTER BATH
TOTAL OF (1)
ITDH2236
W W W ITDH3648
ITDH3648
ITDH3648
14' 0
"5'
6"
3' 3"8' 0"2' 7"
2' 6
"
3' 0" 3' 0" 3' 0"
W PICT.
3' 0"3' 0"
3' 0"3' 0"3' 0"
3' 0
"3'
0"
3' 0
"3'
0"
3' 0" 3' 0" 3' 0" 3' 0" 3' 0" 3' 0"
1' 10"
CO2
65 1/2"W X 79 1/2"H66"W X 80"H
D CLOSET DOOR HALLWAY
TOTAL OF (1)
JELDWEN PRE-HUNG DOORS (SOLID WOOD DOORS) unless specified otherwise
NOTE: ALL EXTERIOR DOORSMEET OR EXCEED ENERGY STAR COMPLIANCE
NOTE: ALL WINDOWS MEET OR EXCEED ENERGY STAR COMPLIANCE PERFORMANCE RATING:Complies with ANSI / AAMA / NWWDA 101 / I.S. 2!97, 101 / I.S. 2/NASF!02 and AAMA / WDMA / CSA101 / I.S. 2 / A440!05.
GIOVANNI'S BEDROOM
203.5F!
MASTERBEDROOM
231F!
MASTERBATHROOM
78F!
HERS 37.5F!
HIS 45F!
HIS 15F!
HERS 15F!
VICTORIA'S BEDROOM
219.5F!
HALL92.5F!
SHAREDBATHROOM
84.5F!
DOUBLE HEIGHT
FOYER
HV
AC
N
3' 0
"
5' 5
"
4' 6"
P.57
TOTAL LIVING AREA 1,495 sq. f. FIRST FLOOR
TOTAL LIVING AREA 1,130 sq. f. SECOND FLOOR
INDEPENDENT PRACTICESUPERVISOR | DIGIORGIO + BRACCIOTI 2010 - 2011 STONEHAM HOUSE PROJECT
Final evaluation prior proceeding forward - The design team came up with design tweaks for a more finite solution. Our final solution inquired the area of the second floor plan with an addition of a cantilever “skirt” around the perimeters of the house., this would allow better circulation and furniture placement. built upon the HYBRID CONCEPT so the owner could proceed to bidding processes. Out of an evaluation of budgetary constrains as well as zoning constraints, overall economy, high efficiency and practicality. The HYBRID CONCEPT we believe is an immediate rational response to all issues related to this project
TOTAL LIVING SPACE 2,625 SQ. F.
PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR PLANPROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLAN
P.58
INDEPENDENT PRACTICESUPERVISOR | DIGIORGIO + BRACCIOTI 2010 - 2011 STONEHAM HOUSE PROJECT
PRECEDENTS AESTHETICSThe client intention was to relate to the immediate neighborhood as much as possible - they requested a modern house with a Colonial Style appearance to fit-in in this existing setting.
SKETCH - INITIAL FRONT FACADE SKETCH - POSTERIOR FRONT FACADE
PRECEDENTS - END OF THE CUL-DE-SAC PRECEDENTS - ACROSS OF THE STREET PRECEDENTS - FIRST HOUSE OF THE STREET
P.59
ELEVATION DESIGN PROCESS - ONE TO ONE PROCESS BETWEEN DESIGNER AND CLIENT OPENED AN OPPORTUNITY TO SOME ATYPICAL COLONIAL APPEARANCE.
TRIAL ITHE INTENTION WAS TO PROVIDE A MORE RECTANGULAR DESIGN - TO REDUCE CONSTRUCTION COST AND TO relate to CLIENT’S interest FOR a COLONIAL APPEARANCE HOME
TRIAL IIT H E I N T E N T I O N WA S T O P R O V I D E FUNCTIONALITY TO THE ATTIC
INDEPENDENT PRACTICESUPERVISOR | DIGIORGIO + BRACCIOTI 2010 - 2011 STONEHAM HOUSE PROJECT
perspective 1
perspective 2
roofing design option#3[protruded bedrooms]
south
Monday, December 13, 2010
TRIAL IIITHE INTENTION WAS TO PROVIDE A MORE CONTEMPORARY DESIGN INFLUENCE
TRIAL IVT H E I N T E N T I O N W A S T O P R O V I D E FUNCTIONALITY TO THE ATTIC AND STILL KEEP A CONTEMPORARY INFLUENCE
roofing design option#2[protruded bedrooms]
01
northsouth
eastwest
south north
eastwest
Monday, December 13, 2010
P.60
ELEVATION DESIGN PROCESS - ONE TO ONE PROCESS BETWEEN DESIGNER AND CLIENT OPENED AN OPPORTUNITY TO SOME ATYPICAL COLONIAL APPEARANCE.
INDEPENDENT PRACTICESUPERVISOR | DIGIORGIO + BRACCIOTI 2010 - 2011 STONEHAM HOUSE PROJECT
roofing design option#4[protruded bedrooms]
south
Monday, December 13, 2010
roofing design option#5[protruded bedrooms]
south
Monday, December 13, 2010
roofing design option#6[protruded bedrooms]
south
Monday, December 13, 2010
P.61
ELEVATION DESIGN PROCESS - ONE TO ONE PROCESS BETWEEN DESIGNER AND CLIENT OPENED UP AN OPPORTUNITY TO SOME ATYPICAL COLONIAL APPEARANCE.
TRIAL VTHE INTENTION WAS TO SATISFY THE CLIENT’S DESIRE OF A FUNCTIONAL ATTIC AND A MORE TRADITIONAL AESTHETICS
TRIAL VITHE INTENTION WAS TO IMPROVE TRIAL DESIGN NUMBER 5
TRIAL VIITHE INTENTION WAS TO IMPROVE TRIAL DESIGN NUMBER 6
INDEPENDENT PRACTICESUPERVISOR | DIGIORGIO + BRACCIOTI 2010 - 2011 STONEHAM HOUSE PROJECT
P.62
FINAL ELEVATION - TO BUILD A BASILICA ROOF-LINE THAT TRANSCENDS SOME MOTION TO THE OTHER VOLUMES AS IF THEY WERE EXTRUDING OUTWARDS ON THEIR OWN.
INDEPENDENT PRACTICESUPERVISOR | DIGIORGIO + BRACCIOTI 2010 - 2011 STONEHAM HOUSE PROJECT
05
SOUTH ELEVATIONScale: 1/4" : 1' - 0'
A5
NORTH ELEVATIONScale: 1/4" : 1' - 0'
A5
EAST ELEVATIONScale: 1/4" : 1' - 0'
A5
WEST ELEVATIONScale: 1/4" : 1' - 0'
A5
ROOF PLANScale: 1/4" : 1' - 0'
A5
+/- -2'
+/- 0'
+/- 3'
+/- 5'
+/- 8'
+/- 9'
+/- 18'
+/- 19'
+/- 28'
+/- 27'
+/-33' 6"
NOTE:SEWER CONNECTIONEVERY 1' : 1 5/8" PITCH; ASSUMINGINVERSE AS 30F AWAY FROM HOUSE
+/- 183'-0" A.S.L.
FIRST FLOOR PLAN ELEVATION
+/- 181'-0" A.S.L.
GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION
+/- 178'-0" A.S.L.
STREET LEVEL ELEVATION
+/- 175'-0" A.S.L.
BASEMENT FLOOR ELEVATION
+/- 192'-0" A.S.L.
SECOND FLOOR PLAN ELEVATION
+/- 200'-0" A.S.L.
SECOND FLOOR PLATE ELEVATION
+/- 208'-0" A.S.L.
ROOF LINE ELEVATION
N
A 5
E
A 5
S
A 5
W
A 5
NA 5
N
A 5
S
A 5
W A 5
E
NOTE:FABRAL 1-1/2" SSR
24 GAUGE STEEL METAL ROOFING
NOTE:LIMESTONE PORTICO
NOTE:PERMEABLE PAVEMENT
NOTE:CEMENT PAVERS
NOTE:COMPOSITE DECKING
WATER RUNOFF
WATER RUNOFF
AZTEK BOARDSALL CORNERS
& JOINTS
JAMES HARDIECEMENT BOARD
SIDING
3242 3242 3242 3242 3242 3242PICT.
SPECIALTY
BAY
1836
3236
817
STONE CLADDING APPROX. 600 SQ. F.
GUTTERS
INSULATED CLOPAY TRADITIONAL SERIES
GARAGE DOORSTOTAL OF (2)
STEPHENSONSTANDARD 4 SIDEDCUPOLA MODEL 48-C (BROSCO P.B331)
A9 1
A9
2
GENERAL NOTESGENERAL CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS ON SITE AND SHALL NOT RELY ON DRAWINGS, CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL MATERIALS ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS AND ALL APPLICABLE MASSACHUSETTS BUILDING CODES,SUB CONTRACTORS SHALL NOT PERFORM WORK IN CASE OF ANY UNCERTAINTY. GENERAL CONTRACTOR MUST NOTIFY ARCHITECT AND ONWER IN WRITING - IN CASE OF DISCREPANCIES,ALL WORKMEN SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR WORK.
3242
3648 3648 3648 3648
61B 61B3676 3676 3676 3676
6065XXL 6065XXL
3648
3676
6065XXL
3676 3676 3676
6065XXL 3676 3676 3676 3676 3676
3648 3648 3648 3648 3648
3676 3676 3676
PICT.
3676 3676 3676 3676 3676 3676
THERMA-TRU
DE
SC
RIP
TIO
NEL
EVATI
ON
S
DR
AW
N B
YAN
DR
E VASC
ON
CEL
OS
RE
-IS
SU
E08
.09.
08
ISS
UE
08.0
8.08
CLI
EN
TM
R.
MS.
LEO
NE
25 C
LEVEL
AN
D A
VE.
EV
ERET
T, M
A,
0214
9 PH
ON
E: 6
17 3
1227
40
IND
EP
EN
DE
NT
PR
AC
TIC
EBO
STO
N A
RC
HIT
ECTU
RAL
CO
LLEG
E U
ND
ER S
UPE
RVIS
ION
OF
FACU
LTY
PR
OJE
CT
CR
AFT
SM
AN
SIN
GLE
FA
MIL
Y D
WEL
LIN
G
PR
OJE
CT
NO
.24
5.17
0
A
SEPT. 11:30 AM SEPT. 6:30 PM
SEPT. 3:30 PM SEPT. 8:30 AM
SEPT. 2:30 PM
05
SOUTH ELEVATIONScale: 1/4" : 1' - 0'
A5
NORTH ELEVATIONScale: 1/4" : 1' - 0'
A5
EAST ELEVATIONScale: 1/4" : 1' - 0'
A5
WEST ELEVATIONScale: 1/4" : 1' - 0'
A5
ROOF PLANScale: 1/4" : 1' - 0'
A5
+/- -2'
+/- 0'
+/- 3'
+/- 5'
+/- 8'
+/- 9'
+/- 18'
+/- 19'
+/- 28'
+/- 27'
+/-33' 6"
NOTE:SEWER CONNECTIONEVERY 1' : 1 5/8" PITCH; ASSUMINGINVERSE AS 30F AWAY FROM HOUSE
+/- 183'-0" A.S.L.
FIRST FLOOR PLAN ELEVATION
+/- 181'-0" A.S.L.
GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION
+/- 178'-0" A.S.L.
STREET LEVEL ELEVATION
+/- 175'-0" A.S.L.
BASEMENT FLOOR ELEVATION
+/- 192'-0" A.S.L.
SECOND FLOOR PLAN ELEVATION
+/- 200'-0" A.S.L.
SECOND FLOOR PLATE ELEVATION
+/- 208'-0" A.S.L.
ROOF LINE ELEVATION
N
A 5
E
A 5
S
A 5
W
A 5
NA 5
N
A 5
S
A 5
W A 5
E
NOTE:FABRAL 1-1/2" SSR
24 GAUGE STEEL METAL ROOFING
NOTE:LIMESTONE PORTICO
NOTE:PERMEABLE PAVEMENT
NOTE:CEMENT PAVERS
NOTE:COMPOSITE DECKING
WATER RUNOFF
WATER RUNOFF
AZTEK BOARDSALL CORNERS
& JOINTS
JAMES HARDIECEMENT BOARD
SIDING
3242 3242 3242 3242 3242 3242PICT.
SPECIALTY
BAY
1836
3236
817
STONE CLADDING APPROX. 600 SQ. F.
GUTTERS
INSULATED CLOPAY TRADITIONAL SERIES
GARAGE DOORSTOTAL OF (2)
STEPHENSONSTANDARD 4 SIDEDCUPOLA MODEL 48-C (BROSCO P.B331)
A9 1
A9
2
GENERAL NOTESGENERAL CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS ON SITE AND SHALL NOT RELY ON DRAWINGS, CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL MATERIALS ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS AND ALL APPLICABLE MASSACHUSETTS BUILDING CODES,SUB CONTRACTORS SHALL NOT PERFORM WORK IN CASE OF ANY UNCERTAINTY. GENERAL CONTRACTOR MUST NOTIFY ARCHITECT AND ONWER IN WRITING - IN CASE OF DISCREPANCIES,ALL WORKMEN SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR WORK.
3242
3648 3648 3648 3648
61B 61B3676 3676 3676 3676
6065XXL 6065XXL
3648
3676
6065XXL
3676 3676 3676
6065XXL 3676 3676 3676 3676 3676
3648 3648 3648 3648 3648
3676 3676 3676
PICT.
3676 3676 3676 3676 3676 3676
THERMA-TRU
DE
SC
RIP
TIO
NEL
EVATI
ON
S
DR
AW
N B
YAN
DR
E VASC
ON
CEL
OS
RE
-IS
SU
E08
.09.
08
ISS
UE
08.0
8.08
CLI
EN
TM
R.
MS.
LEO
NE
25 C
LEVEL
AN
D A
VE.
EV
ERET
T, M
A,
0214
9 PH
ON
E: 6
17 3
1227
40
IND
EP
EN
DE
NT
PR
AC
TIC
EBO
STO
N A
RC
HIT
ECTU
RAL
CO
LLEG
E U
ND
ER S
UPE
RVIS
ION
OF
FACU
LTY
PR
OJE
CT
CR
AFT
SM
AN
SIN
GLE
FA
MIL
Y D
WEL
LIN
G
PR
OJE
CT
NO
.24
5.17
0
A
SEPT. 11:30 AM SEPT. 6:30 PM
SEPT. 3:30 PM SEPT. 8:30 AM
SEPT. 2:30 PM
05
SOUTH ELEVATIONScale: 1/4" : 1' - 0'
A5
NORTH ELEVATIONScale: 1/4" : 1' - 0'
A5
EAST ELEVATIONScale: 1/4" : 1' - 0'
A5
WEST ELEVATIONScale: 1/4" : 1' - 0'
A5
ROOF PLANScale: 1/4" : 1' - 0'
A5
+/- -2'
+/- 0'
+/- 3'
+/- 5'
+/- 8'
+/- 9'
+/- 18'
+/- 19'
+/- 28'
+/- 27'
+/-33' 6"
NOTE:SEWER CONNECTIONEVERY 1' : 1 5/8" PITCH; ASSUMINGINVERSE AS 30F AWAY FROM HOUSE
+/- 183'-0" A.S.L.
FIRST FLOOR PLAN ELEVATION
+/- 181'-0" A.S.L.
GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION
+/- 178'-0" A.S.L.
STREET LEVEL ELEVATION
+/- 175'-0" A.S.L.
BASEMENT FLOOR ELEVATION
+/- 192'-0" A.S.L.
SECOND FLOOR PLAN ELEVATION
+/- 200'-0" A.S.L.
SECOND FLOOR PLATE ELEVATION
+/- 208'-0" A.S.L.
ROOF LINE ELEVATION
N
A 5
E
A 5
S
A 5
W
A 5
NA 5
N
A 5
S
A 5
W A 5
E
NOTE:FABRAL 1-1/2" SSR
24 GAUGE STEEL METAL ROOFING
NOTE:LIMESTONE PORTICO
NOTE:PERMEABLE PAVEMENT
NOTE:CEMENT PAVERS
NOTE:COMPOSITE DECKING
WATER RUNOFF
WATER RUNOFF
AZTEK BOARDSALL CORNERS
& JOINTS
JAMES HARDIECEMENT BOARD
SIDING
3242 3242 3242 3242 3242 3242PICT.
SPECIALTY
BAY
1836
3236
817
STONE CLADDING APPROX. 600 SQ. F.
GUTTERS
INSULATED CLOPAY TRADITIONAL SERIES
GARAGE DOORSTOTAL OF (2)
STEPHENSONSTANDARD 4 SIDEDCUPOLA MODEL 48-C (BROSCO P.B331)
A9 1
A9
2
GENERAL NOTESGENERAL CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS ON SITE AND SHALL NOT RELY ON DRAWINGS, CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL MATERIALS ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS AND ALL APPLICABLE MASSACHUSETTS BUILDING CODES,SUB CONTRACTORS SHALL NOT PERFORM WORK IN CASE OF ANY UNCERTAINTY. GENERAL CONTRACTOR MUST NOTIFY ARCHITECT AND ONWER IN WRITING - IN CASE OF DISCREPANCIES,ALL WORKMEN SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR WORK.
3242
3648 3648 3648 3648
61B 61B3676 3676 3676 3676
6065XXL 6065XXL
3648
3676
6065XXL
3676 3676 3676
6065XXL 3676 3676 3676 3676 3676
3648 3648 3648 3648 3648
3676 3676 3676
PICT.
3676 3676 3676 3676 3676 3676
THERMA-TRU
DE
SC
RIP
TIO
NEL
EVATI
ON
S
DR
AW
N B
YAN
DR
E VASC
ON
CEL
OS
RE
-IS
SU
E08
.09.
08
ISS
UE
08.0
8.08
CLI
EN
TM
R.
MS.
LEO
NE
25 C
LEVEL
AN
D A
VE.
EV
ERET
T, M
A,
0214
9 PH
ON
E: 6
17 3
1227
40
IND
EP
EN
DE
NT
PR
AC
TIC
EBO
STO
N A
RC
HIT
ECTU
RAL
CO
LLEG
E U
ND
ER S
UPE
RVIS
ION
OF
FACU
LTY
PR
OJE
CT
CR
AFT
SM
AN
SIN
GLE
FA
MIL
Y D
WEL
LIN
G
PR
OJE
CT
NO
.24
5.17
0
A
SEPT. 11:30 AM SEPT. 6:30 PM
SEPT. 3:30 PM SEPT. 8:30 AM
SEPT. 2:30 PM
05
SOUTH ELEVATIONScale: 1/4" : 1' - 0'
A5
NORTH ELEVATIONScale: 1/4" : 1' - 0'
A5
EAST ELEVATIONScale: 1/4" : 1' - 0'
A5
WEST ELEVATIONScale: 1/4" : 1' - 0'
A5
ROOF PLANScale: 1/4" : 1' - 0'
A5
+/- -2'
+/- 0'
+/- 3'
+/- 5'
+/- 8'
+/- 9'
+/- 18'
+/- 19'
+/- 28'
+/- 27'
+/-33' 6"
NOTE:SEWER CONNECTIONEVERY 1' : 1 5/8" PITCH; ASSUMINGINVERSE AS 30F AWAY FROM HOUSE
+/- 183'-0" A.S.L.
FIRST FLOOR PLAN ELEVATION
+/- 181'-0" A.S.L.
GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION
+/- 178'-0" A.S.L.
STREET LEVEL ELEVATION
+/- 175'-0" A.S.L.
BASEMENT FLOOR ELEVATION
+/- 192'-0" A.S.L.
SECOND FLOOR PLAN ELEVATION
+/- 200'-0" A.S.L.
SECOND FLOOR PLATE ELEVATION
+/- 208'-0" A.S.L.
ROOF LINE ELEVATION
N
A 5
E
A 5
S
A 5
W
A 5
NA 5
N
A 5
S
A 5
W A 5
E
NOTE:FABRAL 1-1/2" SSR
24 GAUGE STEEL METAL ROOFING
NOTE:LIMESTONE PORTICO
NOTE:PERMEABLE PAVEMENT
NOTE:CEMENT PAVERS
NOTE:COMPOSITE DECKING
WATER RUNOFF
WATER RUNOFF
AZTEK BOARDSALL CORNERS
& JOINTS
JAMES HARDIECEMENT BOARD
SIDING
3242 3242 3242 3242 3242 3242PICT.
SPECIALTY
BAY
1836
3236
817
STONE CLADDING APPROX. 600 SQ. F.
GUTTERS
INSULATED CLOPAY TRADITIONAL SERIES
GARAGE DOORSTOTAL OF (2)
STEPHENSONSTANDARD 4 SIDEDCUPOLA MODEL 48-C (BROSCO P.B331)
A9 1
A9
2
GENERAL NOTESGENERAL CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS ON SITE AND SHALL NOT RELY ON DRAWINGS, CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL MATERIALS ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS AND ALL APPLICABLE MASSACHUSETTS BUILDING CODES,SUB CONTRACTORS SHALL NOT PERFORM WORK IN CASE OF ANY UNCERTAINTY. GENERAL CONTRACTOR MUST NOTIFY ARCHITECT AND ONWER IN WRITING - IN CASE OF DISCREPANCIES,ALL WORKMEN SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR WORK.
3242
3648 3648 3648 3648
61B 61B3676 3676 3676 3676
6065XXL 6065XXL
3648
3676
6065XXL
3676 3676 3676
6065XXL 3676 3676 3676 3676 3676
3648 3648 3648 3648 3648
3676 3676 3676
PICT.
3676 3676 3676 3676 3676 3676
THERMA-TRU
DE
SC
RIP
TIO
NEL
EVATI
ON
S
DR
AW
N B
YAN
DR
E VASC
ON
CEL
OS
RE
-IS
SU
E08
.09.
08
ISS
UE
08.0
8.08
CLI
EN
TM
R.
MS.
LEO
NE
25 C
LEVEL
AN
D A
VE.
EV
ERET
T, M
A,
0214
9 PH
ON
E: 6
17 3
1227
40
IND
EP
EN
DE
NT
PR
AC
TIC
EBO
STO
N A
RC
HIT
ECTU
RAL
CO
LLEG
E U
ND
ER S
UPE
RVIS
ION
OF
FACU
LTY
PR
OJE
CT
CR
AFT
SM
AN
SIN
GLE
FA
MIL
Y D
WEL
LIN
G
PR
OJE
CT
NO
.24
5.17
0
A
SEPT. 11:30 AM SEPT. 6:30 PM
SEPT. 3:30 PM SEPT. 8:30 AM
SEPT. 2:30 PM
05
SOUTH ELEVATIONScale: 1/4" : 1' - 0'
A5
NORTH ELEVATIONScale: 1/4" : 1' - 0'
A5
EAST ELEVATIONScale: 1/4" : 1' - 0'
A5
WEST ELEVATIONScale: 1/4" : 1' - 0'
A5
ROOF PLANScale: 1/4" : 1' - 0'
A5
+/- -2'
+/- 0'
+/- 3'
+/- 5'
+/- 8'
+/- 9'
+/- 18'
+/- 19'
+/- 28'
+/- 27'
+/-33' 6"
NOTE:SEWER CONNECTIONEVERY 1' : 1 5/8" PITCH; ASSUMINGINVERSE AS 30F AWAY FROM HOUSE
+/- 183'-0" A.S.L.
FIRST FLOOR PLAN ELEVATION
+/- 181'-0" A.S.L.
GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION
+/- 178'-0" A.S.L.
STREET LEVEL ELEVATION
+/- 175'-0" A.S.L.
BASEMENT FLOOR ELEVATION
+/- 192'-0" A.S.L.
SECOND FLOOR PLAN ELEVATION
+/- 200'-0" A.S.L.
SECOND FLOOR PLATE ELEVATION
+/- 208'-0" A.S.L.
ROOF LINE ELEVATION
N
A 5
E
A 5
S
A 5
W
A 5
NA 5
N
A 5
S
A 5
W A 5
E
NOTE:FABRAL 1-1/2" SSR
24 GAUGE STEEL METAL ROOFING
NOTE:LIMESTONE PORTICO
NOTE:PERMEABLE PAVEMENT
NOTE:CEMENT PAVERS
NOTE:COMPOSITE DECKING
WATER RUNOFF
WATER RUNOFF
AZTEK BOARDSALL CORNERS
& JOINTS
JAMES HARDIECEMENT BOARD
SIDING
3242 3242 3242 3242 3242 3242PICT.
SPECIALTY
BAY
1836
3236
817
STONE CLADDING APPROX. 600 SQ. F.
GUTTERS
INSULATED CLOPAY TRADITIONAL SERIES
GARAGE DOORSTOTAL OF (2)
STEPHENSONSTANDARD 4 SIDEDCUPOLA MODEL 48-C (BROSCO P.B331)
A9 1
A9
2
GENERAL NOTESGENERAL CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS ON SITE AND SHALL NOT RELY ON DRAWINGS, CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL MATERIALS ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS AND ALL APPLICABLE MASSACHUSETTS BUILDING CODES,SUB CONTRACTORS SHALL NOT PERFORM WORK IN CASE OF ANY UNCERTAINTY. GENERAL CONTRACTOR MUST NOTIFY ARCHITECT AND ONWER IN WRITING - IN CASE OF DISCREPANCIES,ALL WORKMEN SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR WORK.
3242
3648 3648 3648 3648
61B 61B3676 3676 3676 3676
6065XXL 6065XXL
3648
3676
6065XXL
3676 3676 3676
6065XXL 3676 3676 3676 3676 3676
3648 3648 3648 3648 3648
3676 3676 3676
PICT.
3676 3676 3676 3676 3676 3676
THERMA-TRU
DE
SC
RIP
TIO
NEL
EVATI
ON
S
DR
AW
N B
YAN
DR
E VASC
ON
CEL
OS
RE
-IS
SU
E08
.09.
08
ISS
UE
08.0
8.08
CLI
EN
TM
R.
MS.
LEO
NE
25 C
LEVEL
AN
D A
VE.
EV
ERET
T, M
A,
0214
9 PH
ON
E: 6
17 3
1227
40
IND
EP
EN
DE
NT
PR
AC
TIC
EBO
STO
N A
RC
HIT
ECTU
RAL
CO
LLEG
E U
ND
ER S
UPE
RVIS
ION
OF
FACU
LTY
PR
OJE
CT
CR
AFT
SM
AN
SIN
GLE
FA
MIL
Y D
WEL
LIN
G
PR
OJE
CT
NO
.24
5.17
0
A
SEPT. 11:30 AM SEPT. 6:30 PM
SEPT. 3:30 PM SEPT. 8:30 AM
SEPT. 2:30 PM
P.63
INDEPENDENT PRACTICESUPERVISOR | DIGIORGIO + BRACCIOTI 2010 - 2011 STONEHAM HOUSE PROJECT
ELEVATIONS AND ROOF PLAN
DR
AW
N B
YAN
DR
E VASC
ON
CEL
OS
RE
-IS
SU
E08
.09.
08
ISS
UE
08.0
8.08
CLI
EN
TM
R.
MS.
LEO
NE
25 C
LEVEL
AN
D A
VE.
EV
ERET
T, M
A,
0214
9 PH
ON
E: 6
17 3
1227
40
IND
EP
EN
DE
NT
PR
AC
TIC
EBO
STO
N A
RC
HIT
ECTU
RAL
CO
LLEG
E U
ND
ER S
UPE
RVIS
ION
OF
FACU
LTY
PR
OJE
CT
CO
NTE
MPO
RARY
SIN
GLE
FAM
ILY
HO
ME
PR
OJE
CT
NO
.24
5.17
0
A
DE
SC
RIP
TIO
NBASEM
ENT
FLO
OR P
LAN
BASEMENT FLOOR PLANScale: 1/4" : 1' - 0'
A1
01
PROPOSEDINFILTRATION SYSTEM
30' X 7' REFER TO TOPO
10" THICK CONCRETE (TYP.) FOUNDATION WALL
CONTRACTOR SHALL DEFINE CHANGES IF ANY NECESSARY
WALL PLATE ATTACHED
WITH SIMPSON HURRICANE TIES
BLOCKING
TJI- I JOISTSCONTRACTOR TO VERIFY SIZING
MINIMUM DEPTH REQUIRED 11 3/4"
STEEL I-JOIST OR TRIPLE LVL'SCONTRACTOR TO VERIFY SIZING
MINIMUM DEPTH REQUIRED 11 3/4"
(TYP.) LOLLY COLUMN 3.5" DIA. BOTTOM PLATE BOLTED TO SLAB & TOP PLATE
BOLTED TO LVL BEAM ABOVE
COLUNM BASEFOR DECK ABOVETOTAL OF (9)
40°BUILDING IS 40 DEGREES COUNTER CLOCKWISE FROM SCHIAPPA CR. AXIS
GARAGE SLAB545 F!
BASEMENT1460 F!
D
36" W. STAIRCASE
WINDOW SCHEDULE
DOOR SCHEDULE
ROUGH SIZE UNIT SIZE
6' W X 6' 8"H 5' 11"W X 6' 7 1/2"H
D IOFD6065XXL TOTAL OF (3)
STONEHAM FIRE DTP.
H. DETECTOR TOTAL OF (2)
TOTAL OF (3)SMOKE
DETECTOR
TOTAL OF (1)CARBON MONOXIDE
GENERAL NOTES
H. DETECTOR
SMOKE DETECTOR
CARBON MONOXIDE
SMOKE DETECTOR
26' 6
"8'
9"
18' 6
"
19' 6"
22' 0"
13' 3"5' 6"10' 0"5' 6"11' 6"
20' 6
"
8' 0
"
28' 3"
7' 9"32' 6"
D
D
WALK OUT PATIO
12' 0
"
SLAB /PAVERS475 F!
PAVERS140 F!
+/- 183'-0" A.S.L.
FIRST FLOOR PLAN ELEVATION
+/- 181'-0" A.S.L.
GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION
+/- 178'-0" A.S.L.
STREET LEVEL ELEVATION
+/- 175'-0" A.S.L.
BASEMENT FLOOR ELEVATION
3' 1/2"W X 4' 1/4"H
W
2' 11 1/2"W X 3' 11 1/4"H
ITDH3648 TOTAL OF (1)
W
NOTE:WINDOW CENTERED WITH BAY WINDOW ABOVE
NOTE:PAVED AREA
8' 0"
MARVIN INTEGRITY DOUBLE HUNG (WOOD ULTREX WINDOWS)
MARVIN INTEGRITY DOORS (OUTSWING FRENCH DOOR)
HVAC
95% EFFICIENCY ECONAR GEOTHERMAL A/C AND HEATING SYSTEM - PREPARED BY EAST COAST GEOTHERMAL,LLC464 HIGH STREET, CLINTON, MA 01510. CONTACT INFO. 888-GEO-ENGY
ESTIMATED NEARLY 60% REDUCTION OF HEATING ENERGY COMSUPTION AND 75% REDUCTION OF COOLING USAGE WHEN COMPARED TO CONVENTIONAL NATURAL GAS SYSTEMS
IOFD6065XXL
IOFD6065XXL
IOFD6065XXL
ITDH3648SMOKE
DETECTOR
D E0044
35 1/2"W X 79 1/2"H36"W X 80"H
D E0044BASEMENT ACCESS
ROUGH SIZE UNIT SIZE
TOTAL OF (1)
45' 7"
18"
NOTE:FROST LINE INSULATION
18" AWAY FROM SLABMINIMUM REQUIRED
NOTE: ALL EXTERIOR DOORSMEET OR EXCEED ENERGY STAR COMPLIANCE
NOTE: ALL WINDOWS MEET OR EXCEED ENERGY STAR COMPLIANCE PERFORMANCE RATING:Complies with ANSI / AAMA / NWWDA 101 / I.S. 2!97, 101 / I.S. 2/NASF!02 and AAMA / WDMA / CSA101 / I.S. 2 / A440!05.
NOTE: FRAMING DESIGN CALLS FOR NOMINAL:
10" THICK FOUNDATION WALLS, 12" DEPTH TJI FLOOR JOISTS, 12" DEPTH DOUBLED LVL BEAMS,12" STEEL BEAM ON SPANS OVER 30F (IF NECESSARY)
GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY INSTALL ALL BEAMS AND FLOOR JOISTS ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS AND ALL APPLICABLE BUILDING CODES
6' 0
"
3' 6
"
10' 6
"
12' 6
"
12' 0
"8'
0"
67' 9"
N
7' 0"12' 1"
8' 0" 12' 3"11' 11"
9' 1
0"6'
3"
10' 4
"9'
11"
8' 3" 6' 0" 6' 0"
2' 6
"
ISSUE10.15.10
CLIENTMR. MS. LEONE25 CLEVELAND AVE. EVERETT, MA, 02149. PHONE: 617 3122740
PROJECTSINGLE FAMILY DWELLING
PROJECT NO.245.170
DRAWN BYAV
DESCRIPTIONTITLE SHEET - GENERAL CONTRACTOR NOTESSATELLITE IMAGE OVERLAY & PERSPECTIVES
INDEPENDENT PRACTICEBOSTON ARCHITECTURAL COLLEGE UNDER SUPERVISION OF FACULTY TITLE
TITLE SHEET
N
CODE COMPLIANCE
ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE PERFORMED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITIONS OF
THE FOLLOWING CODES AS ADOPTED BY THE LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES.
SHEET DESCRIPTION
TS - TITLE PAGEA1 - BASEMENT PLAN
A2 - FIRST FLOOR PLAN
A6 - FRAMING PLAN
A11 - SECTIONS, DETAIL
A3 - SECOND FLOOR PLANA4 - ATTIC PLANA5 - ELEVATIONS
A7 - FRAMING PLAN CONT. A8 - FRAMING PLAN CONT. A9 - FRAMING PLAN CONT.A10 - FRAMING PLAN
E12 - ELECTRICAL PLANS
SINGLE FAMILY PROJECT - ASSESSORS MAP 7 AS LOT 412A - LOT D (TOTAL PLOT AREA = 32,125 SQ. F.) (TOTAL LIVING AREA = 2623 SQ. F.) FIRST FLOOR PLAN = 1493 SQ. F. | SECOND FLOOR PLAN = 1130 SQ. F.)
COORDINATION
STRUCTURAL
MECHANICAL
ELECTRICAL
PLUMBING
DATA
OTHER_________
GEN. CONTRACTOR NOTES DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS
CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL PLANS AND EXISTING DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS ON THE JOB SITE AND SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT IN WRITING ON ANY
DISCREPANCIES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK, SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SAME.
LOCUS - SATELLITE IMAGEScale: 1" = 20' - 0'
T
LOT D 32,125 SQ. F.
BUFFER ZONE
SCHIAPPA CR.
00 20 80 40
LEDGE
RETAINING WALL
INFILTRATION SYSTEM
FRONTAL PERSPECTIVE
REAR PERSPECTIVE
RENDERINGSScale: N/A
T
LEDGE
ZONING SETBACKS
BUFFER ZONE
20F10F
10F
P.64
DR
AW
N B
YAN
DR
E VASC
ON
CEL
OS
RE
-IS
SU
E08
.09.
08
ISS
UE
08.0
8.08
CLI
EN
TM
R.
MS.
LEO
NE
25 C
LEVEL
AN
D A
VE.
EV
ERET
T, M
A,
0214
9 PH
ON
E: 6
17 3
1227
40
IND
EP
EN
DE
NT
PR
AC
TIC
EBO
STO
N A
RC
HIT
ECTU
RAL
CO
LLEG
E U
ND
ER S
UPE
RVIS
ION
OF
FACU
LTY
PR
OJE
CT
CO
NTE
MPO
RARY
SIN
GLE
FAM
ILY
HO
ME
PR
OJE
CT
NO
.24
5.17
0
A
DE
SC
RIP
TIO
NFI
RST
FLO
OR P
LAN
GREAT ROOM295 F!
KITCHEN300 F!
DRIVEWAY
D
D
NOTE:36" FIRE PROOF STEEL DOORREQUIRED
817
E0044
SMOKE DETECTOR
& CO2 DETECTOR
H. DETECTOR
H. DETECTOR
W
W
D
D
MULTI-ROOM130 F!
OFFICE100 F!
FOYER180 F!
BATH40 F!
D
D
TWO CAR GARAGE545 F!
NOTE:M08 VSE VELUX SKYLIGHTTOTAL OF (2)
W W
W
W
W
W W W MARVIN ULTREX45 DEGREE DOUBLEHUNG BAYS
W W W
FIRST FLOOR PLANScale: 1/4" : 1' - 0'
A2
DECK475 F!
DINNING182 F!
22' 0"
35' 6
"18
' 6"
8' 0
"
7' 6"8' 0"
10' 0
"10
' 0"
26' 9"
18' 0
"
4' 10"
11"
26' 0
"
5' 0
"
6' 0
"
20' 6
"
10' 5" 5' 0"
7' 0
"5'
6"
3' 0"
7' 6
"
11' 6"
11' 6
"
19' 6"
15' 0
"
14' 3"
28' 4" 12' 0"
8' 0
"20
' 6"
11' 6" 5' 6" 5' 6"10' 0"
27' 3"
6' 6"6' 6"4' 6"6' 0"
14' 0
"
62' 0
"
67' 9"
28' 0"
4' 9"
26' 8"
4' 10"
28' 6"
02
WINDOW SCHEDULE
DOOR SCHEDULE
ROUGH SIZE UNIT SIZE
D
10'W X 8'H 9' 11 1/2" X 89 1/2"
D 61b CLOPAY GARAGE DOOR
STONEHAM FIRE DTP.
H. DETECTOR TOTAL OF (2)
TOTAL OF (2)SMOKE
DETECTOR
TOTAL OF (1)CARBON MONOXIDE
GENERAL NOTES
W 45 DEGREE DOUBLE HUNG BAYS
4' 6"
3' 0
"
3' 6
"3'
10"
2' 6
"3'
2"
2' 6
"2'
6"
2' 6" 2' 6"
13' 3"
NOTE: ALL WINDOWS MUST LINE-UP
3' 8"
11' 0
"7'
0"
4' 0
"
NOTE:LAND LEVEL SPLIT 4F HEIGHTROSE BUSHES OR DWARFAUSTRIAN PINES REQUIREDIN ADDITION TO LANDSCAPING
LAWN AREA
LEDGE AREA
D 61b
D 61b
3' 6
"
LAUNDRY 60 F!
N
W W
MARVIN INTEGRITY DOUBLE HUNG (WOOD ULTREX WINDOWS)
MARVIN INTEGRITY FRENCH DOORS (WOOD ULTREX DOOR)
3' 0 1/2"W X 4' 0 1/4"H
W
2' 11 1/2"W X 3' 11 1/4"H
ITDH3648 TOTAL OF (1)
3' 0 1/2"W X 6' 4 1/2"H
W
2' 11 1/2"W X 6' 3 3/4"H
ITDH3676 TOTAL OF (22)
W ITDHT3616T TOTAL OF (16)
NOTE: TRANSOMS COMBINATION
3' 0 1/2"W X 1' 4 1/4"H
3' 0"W X 1' 4"H
TOTAL OF (1)
6' 6 19/32"W X 6' 5 11/16"H
SAMEW W W
W
W
W
ITDH3676ITDHT3616T
THERMA-TRU FIBER CLASSIC MAHOGANY
7' 5"
32' 6"
59' 9"
3' 0"W X 6' 8"H
2' 11 1/2"W X 6' 7 1/2"H
IIFD30 65XR
TOTAL OF (22)
ROUGH SIZE UNIT SIZE
6' W X 6' 8"H 5' 11"W X 6' 7 1/2"H
D IOFD6065XXL
TOTAL OF (2)
IOFD6065XXL
15' 3"
IOFD6065XXL
9' 6
"3'
0"
3' 6"
ROUGH SIZE UNIT SIZE
TOTAL OF (2)
35 1/2"W X 79 1/2"H36"W X 80"H
D E0044interior door
35 1/2"W X 79 1/2"H36"W X 80"H
D 817fiberglass ext.
TOTAL OF (2)
TOTAL OF (2)
E0044D
D 817
VENT
3' 0"3' 0"3' 0"
3' 0"
17' 9"
2' 0
"
3' 0"3' 0"3' 0"
3' 0
"3'
0"
3' 0
"3'
0"
W W
3' 0" 3' 0" 3' 0" 3' 0" 3' 0" 3' 0"
3' 0" 3' 0" 3' 0"
4' 6"
E0044
GENERAL CONTRACTOR
NOTE: ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE PERFORMED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITIONS OF THE FOLLOWING CODES AS ADOPTED BY THE LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES.
NOTE: ALL OPENINGS MUST BE CHECKED PRE-ORDERING WINDOWS AND DOORS, BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SAME.
3' 6"11' 6"
3' 0
"3'
0"
3' 0
"
21' 0"
PAVERS140 F!
STORAGE
42" RAILING
ITDH3676ITDHT3616T
ITDH3676ITDHT3616T
ITDH3676ITDHT3616T
ITDH3676ITDHT3616T
ITDH3676ITDHT3616T
ITDH3676ITDHT3616T
ITDH3676ITDHT3616T
ITDH3676ITDHT3616T
ITDH3676ITDHT3616T
ITDH3676ITDHT3616T
ITDH3676ITDHT3616T
ITDH3676ITDHT3616T
ITDH3676ITDHT3616T
ITDH3676ITDHT3616T
ITDH3676ITDHT3616T
ITDH3676
ITDH3676
ITDH3676
ITDH3676
ITDH3676
ITDH3676
NOTE: FRAMING DESIGN CALLS FOR NOMINAL:
2 X 6 WALLS, 12" DEPTH LVL ALL HEADERS, 12" TJI FLOOR JOISTS, 12" DEPTH DOUBLED LVL BEAMS,1/2" STRUCTURAL PLYWOOD UNDERFLOOR
GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY AND INSTALL ALL BEAMS AND FLOOR JOISTS ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS AND ALL APPLICABLE BUILDING CODES
GAS VENTLESS FIREPLACE
8' 0
"
12' 6
"3'
6"
MUDROOM + STR.107 F!
6' 0
"
GENERAL NOTES
DR
AW
N B
YAN
DR
E VASC
ON
CEL
OS
RE
-IS
SU
E08
.09.
08
ISS
UE
08.0
8.08
CLI
EN
TM
R.
MS.
LEO
NE
25 C
LEVEL
AN
D A
VE.
EV
ERET
T, M
A,
0214
9 PH
ON
E: 6
17 3
1227
40
IND
EP
EN
DE
NT
PR
AC
TIC
EBO
STO
N A
RC
HIT
ECTU
RAL
CO
LLEG
E U
ND
ER S
UPE
RVIS
ION
OF
FACU
LTY
PR
OJE
CT
CO
NTE
MPO
RARY
SIN
GLE
FAM
ILY
HO
ME
PR
OJE
CT
NO
.24
5.17
0
A
DE
SC
RIP
TIO
NSEC
ON
D F
LOO
R P
LAN
3' 0"
NOTE:PULL-DOWN ACCESS TO ATTIC (TYP.)
9' 0"
SECOND FLOOR PLANScale: 1/4" : 1' - 0'
A3
34' 0"
SMOKE DETECTOR
10' 0
"
38' 6
"
14' 5"
21' 0
"4'
0"
14' 5"
22' 0
"3'
6"
4' 6
"
5' 0"
8' 0
"
5' 6"1' 9"3' 0"6"3' 0"1' 9"5' 6"13' 0"
24' 6
"
38' 6
"
03
WINDOW SCHEDULE
DOOR SCHEDULE
31 1/2"W X 79 1/2"H32"W X 80"H
D CLOSET DOOR
TOTAL OF (5)
35 1/2"W X 79 1/2"H36"W X 80"H
D E0044 TOTAL OF (5)
STONEHAM FIRE DTP.
H. DETECTOR TOTAL OF (1)
TOTAL OF (3)SMOKE
DETECTOR
CARBON MONOXIDE
GENERAL NOTES
NOTE: FRAMING DESIGN CALLS FOR NOMINAL:
2 X 6 WALLS, 12" DEPTH LVL ALL HEADERS, 12" TJI FLOOR JOISTS, 12" DEPTH DOUBLED LVL BEAMS,1/2" STRUCTURAL PLYWOOD UNDERFLOOR
GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL BEAM AND JOISTS SIZES, PROVIDE BEAM CALCULATIONS TO BUILDING INSPECTOR AND INSTALL ALL BEAMS AND FLOOR JOISTS ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS AND ALL APPLICABLE BUILDING CODES
SMOKE DETECTOR
10' 5
"
SMOKE DETECTOR
14' 11"
17' 6"
17' 6"
11' 6
"11
' 6"
9' 0
"
4' 0"
3' 0"
3' 0"
12' 0
"
7' 6"
2' 6"
3' 0
"
3' 0
"
3' 0
"3'
0"
3' 0
"
5' 6
"3'
6"
5' 8
"5'
6"
3' 6
"
3' 6
"
15' 6
"
11' 1
1"
11' 5
"
W W W
W PICT.
W
D E0044
D E0044
D E0044
D E0044
GARAGEROOFTOP
KITCHENROOFTOP
3' 0"
5' 5
"7'
1"
6' 0
"
1' 8
"
7' 1" 5' 2"
NOTE:M08 VSE VELUX SKYLIGHTTOTAL OF (2)
VENT
GUTTER
48' 11"
15' 0"
GUTTER
12' 4"
ROUGH SIZE UNIT SIZE
W PICTUREFOYER WINDOW
NOTE: ALL WINDOWS MUST LINE-UP
MARVIN INTEGRITY DOUBLE HUNG (WOOD ULTREX WINDOWS)
3' 0 1/2"W X 4' 0 1/4"H
W
2' 11 1/2"W X 3' 11 1/4"H
ITDH3648 TOTAL OF (16)
TOTAL OF (2)
3' 0 1/2"W X 6' 5 11/16"H
SAME
TOTAL OF (1)
ROUGH SIZE UNIT SIZE
ITDH3648
ITDH3648
ITDH3648
W ITDH3648
W ITDH3648
W ITDH3648
W ITDH3648
W ITDH3648
W ITDH3648
W ITDH3648
W ITDH3648
W ITDH3648
W ITDH3648
1' 10 1/2"W X 3' 0 1/4"H
W
1' 9 1/2"W X 2' 11 3/4"H
ITDH2236MASTER BATH
TOTAL OF (1)
ITDH2236
W W W ITDH3648
ITDH3648
ITDH3648
14' 0
"5'
6"
3' 3"8' 0"2' 7"
2' 6
"
3' 0" 3' 0" 3' 0"
W PICT.
3' 0"3' 0"
3' 0"3' 0"3' 0"
3' 0
"3'
0"
3' 0
"3'
0"
3' 0" 3' 0" 3' 0" 3' 0" 3' 0" 3' 0"
1' 10"
CO2
65 1/2"W X 79 1/2"H66"W X 80"H
D CLOSET DOOR HALLWAY
TOTAL OF (1)
JELDWEN PRE-HUNG DOORS (SOLID WOOD DOORS) unless specified otherwise
NOTE: ALL EXTERIOR DOORSMEET OR EXCEED ENERGY STAR COMPLIANCE
NOTE: ALL WINDOWS MEET OR EXCEED ENERGY STAR COMPLIANCE PERFORMANCE RATING:Complies with ANSI / AAMA / NWWDA 101 / I.S. 2!97, 101 / I.S. 2/NASF!02 and AAMA / WDMA / CSA101 / I.S. 2 / A440!05.
GIOVANNI'S BEDROOM
203.5F!
MASTERBEDROOM
231F!
MASTERBATHROOM
78F!
HERS 37.5F!
HIS 45F!
HIS 15F!
HERS 15F!
VICTORIA'S BEDROOM
219.5F!
HALL92.5F!
SHAREDBATHROOM
84.5F!
DOUBLE HEIGHT
FOYER
HV
AC
N
3' 0
"
5' 5
"
4' 6"
DR
AW
N B
YAN
DR
E VASC
ON
CEL
OS
RE
-IS
SU
E08
.09.
08
ISS
UE
08.0
8.08
CLI
EN
TM
R.
MS.
LEO
NE
25 C
LEVEL
AN
D A
VE.
EV
ERET
T, M
A,
0214
9 PH
ON
E: 6
17 3
1227
40
IND
EP
EN
DE
NT
PR
AC
TIC
EBO
STO
N A
RC
HIT
ECTU
RAL
CO
LLEG
E U
ND
ER S
UPE
RVIS
ION
OF
FACU
LTY
PR
OJE
CT
CO
NTE
MPO
RARY
SIN
GLE
FAM
ILY
HO
ME
PR
OJE
CT
NO
.24
5.17
0
A
DE
SC
RIP
TIO
NATT
IC L
AYO
UT
ATTIC LAYOUTScale: 1/4" : 1' - 0'
A4
04
31 1/2"W X 41 1/2"H
W
WINDOW SCHEDULE
DOOR SCHEDULE
32"W X 42"H
71 1/2"W X 41 1/2"H
W
72"W X 42"H
SPECIALTY(1 right triangle) (1 left triangle)
JELDWEN PRE-HUNG DOORS (SOLID WOOD DOORS) unless specified otherwise
TOTAL OF (1)
TOTAL OF (2)
STONEHAM FIRE DTP.
H. DETECTOR TOTAL OF (0)
TOTAL OF (1)SMOKE
DETECTOR
TOTAL OF (0)CARBON MONOXIDE
21' 0"
10' 0
"
38' 6
"
21' 0
"4'
0"
48' 11"
15' 0"3' 0"6' 11"13' 0"
24' 0
"
38' 6
"
10' 1
1"
15' 0"
3' 6
"
3' 6
"
6' 11"
3' 0"9' 0" 9' 0"
W
W SPECIALTY WINDOWS
SMOKE DETECTOR
SPRAY FOAMAREA R40
SPRAY FOAMAREA R40
ATTIC590 F!
13' 0"
3' 0"
NOTE:PULL-DOWN ACCESS TO ATTIC (TYP.)
MARVIN INTEGRITY DOUBLE HUNG (WOOD ULTREX WINDOWS)
ITDH3648
NOTE:STEPHENSON STANDARD 4 SIDED CUPOLA 48-C 28"X 28"X 42" (TYP.)
ROUGH SIZE UNIT SIZE
ROUGH SIZE UNIT SIZE
ITDH3648
GENERAL NOTES
NOTE: FRAMING DESIGN CALLS FOR NOMINAL:
2 X 6 WALLS, 12" DEPTH LVL ALL HEADERS, 12" TJI FLOOR JOISTS, 12" DEPTH DOUBLED LVL BEAMS,1/2" STRUCTURAL PLYWOOD UNDERFLOOR
GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY AND INSTALL ALL BEAMS AND FLOOR JOISTS ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS AND ALL APPLICABLE BUILDING CODES
N/A
ROOF OVERHANG PERIMETR
N
DE
SC
RIP
TIO
NEL
ECTR
ICAL
& M
ECH
AN
ICAL
DIA
GR
AM
DR
AW
N B
YAN
DR
E VASC
ON
CEL
OS
RE
-IS
SU
E00
.00.
00
ISS
UE
01.0
1.11
CLI
EN
TM
R.
MS.
LEO
NE
25 C
LEVEL
AN
D A
VE.
EV
ERET
T, M
A,
0214
9 PH
ON
E: 6
17 3
1227
40
IND
EP
EN
DE
NT
PR
AC
TIC
EBO
STO
N A
RC
HIT
ECTU
RAL
CO
LLEG
E U
ND
ER S
UPE
RVIS
ION
OF
FACU
LTY
PR
OJE
CT
SIN
GLE
FA
MIL
Y D
WEL
LIN
G
PR
OJE
CT
NO
.24
5.17
0
E12
GENERAL NOTES
GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ON SITE AND INSTALL ALL MECHANICAL & ELECTRICAL EQUIP. ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS AND ALL APPLICABLE BUILDING CODES ADOPTED BY THE LOCAL AUTHORITIES. GENERAL AND SUB CONTRACTORS TO PERFORM THE WORK AND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SAME.
$
$
$
$
$
$
$$
$
$
$
$
$$
$
$
$
$$
$$
TV CABLE
$
$
DISHWASHER
$
$$
$$ $$
$
$$
$
$
HEAT/ACTHERMOSTAT
$ WASHER & DRIER
$
$ $
ELECTRICAL LEGEND
5" DIA. RECESSED LIGHTING
$$
$
3WAY
3WAY
3WAY
EXTERIOR LIGHT FIXTURE
OUTLET
THERMOSTAT HEAT/AC
BATHROOM FAN
$
$
HEAT&COOL.EQUIP.
WATERMAIN LINE
200AMPSELECTRICALPANEL EQUIP.
GASMAIN LINE
FIRST FLOOR PLANScale: 1/8" : 1' - 0'
E
SECOND FLOOR PLANScale: 1/8" : 1' - 0'
E
ATTIC PLANScale: 1/8" : 1' - 0'
EBASEMENT PLANScale: 1/8" : 1' - 0'
E
$
$
$
$
$
MECHANICAL LEGEND
GAS LINE
WATER LINE
FLUORESCENT CLOSET FIXTURES
$$
RECOMENDATION
DESIGNER'S RECOMMENDATION FOR FIXTURES IS A MINIMUM OF 75% OF LIVING AREA TO HAVEL E D ( LIGHT-EMITTING DIODE)LIGHTING TECHNOLOGY TO REDUCE OVERALL ENERGY CONSUMPTION AND HEAT FLUCTUATION
PROJECT DOCUMENTATION PART I
INDEPENDENT PRACTICESUPERVISOR | DIGIORGIO + BRACCIOTI 2010 - 2011 STONEHAM HOUSE PROJECT
DE
SC
RIP
TIO
ND
ETAIL
S
DR
AW
N B
YAN
DR
E V
ASC
ON
CELO
S
RE
-IS
SU
E08.0
9.0
8
ISS
UE
08.0
8.0
8C
LIE
NT
MR.
MS.
LEO
NE
25 C
LEVELA
ND
AVE.
EVER
ETT,
MA,
02149
PH
ON
E:
617 3
122740
IND
EP
EN
DE
NT
PR
AC
TIC
EBO
STO
N A
RC
HIT
EC
TU
RAL
CO
LLEG
E
UN
DER S
UPERVIS
ION
OF
FACU
LTY
PR
OJE
CT
CR
AFT
SM
AN
SIN
GLE
FA
MIL
Y D
WELL
ING
PR
OJE
CT
NO
.245.1
70
A09
FRAMING PLAN - WEST SECTION Scale: 1/4" : 1' - 0'
A9
9' 8"10' 3"12' 3"
9'
2' 0"
7' 0"
1'
7' 10"
1'
5' 4"
FRAMING PLAN - CROSS SECTIONScale: 1/4" : 1' - 0'
A9
11' 9" 8' 0" 12' 0" 5' 11" 6' 5" 6' 6"
12" STEEL I-JOIST SIZING AND QUANTITY
TO BE VERIFIED BY CONTRACTOR
(TYP.) STEEL LOLLY COLUNM3" DIAMETER TOP AND BOTTOM
PLATES ATTACHED BY MANUFACTURE'S RECOMMENDATIONS
CONCRETE FOUNDATION WALLASPHALTIC DAMP PROOF & POLYSTYRENE
FOAM BOARD MINIMUM 1/2" THICK ALL FOUNDATION WALL
BELOW GRADE
INFILTRATION SYSTEM PIPING
NOTE:CUPOLA MAY BE ADDED
AFTER PROJECT'S COMPLETION
LOW BEARING WALL
27' 8"
1' 6"
A9 1 A9
2
GENERAL NOTES
GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL BEAM AND JOISTS SIZES, PROVIDE BEAM CALCULATIONS TO BUILDING INSPECTOR AND INSTALL ALL BEAMS AND FLOOR JOISTS ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS AND ALL APPLICABLE BUILDING CODESPERFORM THE WORK AND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SAME
LOW BEARING WALL
5' 11"
P.65
06
FRAMING ISO ILUSTRATIONScale: 1/4" : 1' - 0'
A6
FOUNDATIONS SLABMINIMUM 12" REQUIRED
FOUNDATION WALL10" THICK CONCRETE WITH
12" JOIST LAP
WALL RIM2 X 12 I-LEVEL LVL
2 X 6 LUMBER
ALL RIM JOIST 2 X 12 LVL'S
ALL VERTICAL MEMBERS2 X 6 INCLUDING
WALL PLATES, KING JACKSCRIPLE JACKS
ALL HEADERS 2 X 12 LVL'S
2 X 12 RAFTERS16" OC
PLUMB CUT SIMPSON U-HANGER TIES
WITH DOUBLE SHEAR NAILING
I-LEVEL 2 X 12 TJI FLOOR JOIST
2 X 12 RAFTERS16" OC
6 X 6 OPENING WITH 2 X12 LVL COLAR TIES
2 X 12 RAFTERS16" OC
I-LEVEL TJI CEILING JOISTS
2 X 12 RAFTERS16" OC
2 X 12 RAFTERSBIRDS BEAKLAP CONNECTION
LOOKOUT18"
KNEE WALL2 X 6
FLASHING COVERED BY
SLATE SHINGLE NON-OPERABLE WINDOW
DE
SC
RIP
TIO
NIS
OM
ETR
IC F
RAM
E
DR
AW
N B
YAN
DR
E VASC
ON
CEL
OS
RE
-IS
SU
E08
.09.
08
ISS
UE
08.0
8.08
CLI
EN
TM
R.
MS.
LEO
NE
25 C
LEVEL
AN
D A
VE.
EV
ERET
T, M
A,
0214
9 PH
ON
E: 6
17 3
1227
40
IND
EP
EN
DE
NT
PR
AC
TIC
EBO
STO
N A
RC
HIT
ECTU
RAL
CO
LLEG
E U
ND
ER S
UPE
RVIS
ION
OF
FACU
LTY
PR
OJE
CT
CR
AFT
SM
AN
SIN
GLE
FA
MIL
Y D
WEL
LIN
G
PR
OJE
CT
NO
.24
5.17
0
A
GENERAL NOTES
NOTE: FRAMING DESIGN CALLS FOR NOMINAL:
2 X 6 WALL STUD @16 OC1/2" STRUCTURAL PLYWOOD UNDERFLOOR/SHEATHING12" DEPTH LVL ALL HEADERS, 12" TJI FLOOR CEILING JOISTS, 12" DEPTH DOUBLED LVL BEAMS,12" DEPTH RIM JOIST LVL BEAMS,12" LUMBER ROOF GABLE DESIGN W/ LVL COMBINATION AROUND PERIMETER OF STRUCTURE 12" DEPTH STEEL (IF ANY NECESSARY)
HAND NOTES
07FRAMING ISO BASEMENTScale: 1/4" : 1' - 0'
A7
FRAMING ISO FIRST FLOORScale: 1/4" : 1' - 0'
A7
CEMENT SLAB8" MINIMUM DEPTH REQUIRED
INFILTRATION SYSTEMSEE DETAILS ON
TOPOGRAPHIC DIAGRAM
DECK FRAME
DE
SC
RIP
TIO
NFR
AM
E IS
OM
ETR
IC P
LAN
S
DR
AW
N B
YAN
DR
E VASC
ON
CEL
OS
RE
-IS
SU
E08
.09.
08
ISS
UE
08.0
8.08
CLI
EN
TM
R.
MS.
LEO
NE
25 C
LEVEL
AN
D A
VE.
EV
ERET
T, M
A,
0214
9 PH
ON
E: 6
17 3
1227
40
IND
EP
EN
DE
NT
PR
AC
TIC
EBO
STO
N A
RC
HIT
ECTU
RAL
CO
LLEG
E U
ND
ER S
UPE
RVIS
ION
OF
FACU
LTY
PR
OJE
CT
CR
AFT
SM
AN
SIN
GLE
FA
MIL
Y D
WEL
LIN
G
PR
OJE
CT
NO
.24
5.17
0
A
8' 0
"
GENERAL NOTES
NOTE: FRAMING DESIGN CALLS FOR NOMINAL:
2 X 6 WALL STUD @16 OC1/2" STRUCTURAL PLYWOOD UNDERFLOOR/SHEATHING12" DEPTH LVL ALL HEADERS, 12" TJI FLOOR CEILING JOISTS, 12" DEPTH DOUBLED LVL BEAMS,12" DEPTH RIM JOIST LVL BEAMS,12" LUMBER ROOF GABLE DESIGN W/ LVL COMBINATION AROUND PERIMETER OF STRUCTURE 12" DEPTH STEEL (IF ANY NECESSARY)
08FRAMING ISO FIRST FLOOR CEILINGScale: 1/4" : 1' - 0'
A8
FRAMING ISO SECOND FLOORScale: 1/4" : 1' - 0'
A8
FRAMING ISO 2ND FLOOR CEILING & ROOFScale: 1/4" : 1' - 0'
A8
FIRST FLOOR CEILING FRAME
NOTE: FRAME EXTENDS 2 FEET BEYOND WALL PERIMETER
NOTE: FRAME EXTENDS 2 FEET BEYOND WALL PERIMETER
SECOND FLOOR CEILING FRAME
CUPOLA MINI VALEY SECURED BY COLLAR BRACING
ROOFTOPS ISOMETRIC DRAWING
FRAMING
DE
SC
RIP
TIO
NFR
AM
E IS
OM
ETR
IC P
LAN
S
DR
AW
N B
YAN
DR
E VASC
ON
CEL
OS
RE
-IS
SU
E08
.09.
08
ISS
UE
08.0
8.08
CLI
EN
TM
R.
MS.
LEO
NE
25 C
LEVEL
AN
D A
VE.
EV
ERET
T, M
A,
0214
9 PH
ON
E: 6
17 3
1227
40
IND
EP
EN
DE
NT
PR
AC
TIC
EBO
STO
N A
RC
HIT
ECTU
RAL
CO
LLEG
E U
ND
ER S
UPE
RVIS
ION
OF
FACU
LTY
PR
OJE
CT
CR
AFT
SM
AN
SIN
GLE
FA
MIL
Y D
WEL
LIN
G
PR
OJE
CT
NO
.24
5.17
0
A
GENERAL NOTES
NOTE: FRAMING DESIGN CALLS FOR NOMINAL:
2 X 6 WALL STUD @16 OC1/2" STRUCTURAL PLYWOOD UNDERFLOOR/SHEATHING12" DEPTH LVL ALL HEADERS, 12" TJI FLOOR CEILING JOISTS, 12" DEPTH DOUBLED LVL BEAMS,12" DEPTH RIM JOIST LVL BEAMS,12" LUMBER ROOF GABLE DESIGN W/ LVL COMBINATION AROUND PERIMETER OF STRUCTURE 12" DEPTH STEEL (IF ANY NECESSARY)
09
FRAMING PLAN - BASEMENT TO FIRST FLOORScale: 1/8" : 1' - 0'
A9
FRAMING PLAN - FIRST FLOOR TO CEILINGScale: 1/8" : 1' - 0'
A9
FRAMING PLAN - SECOND FLOOR Scale: 1/8" : 1' - 0'
A9
FRAMING PLAN - SECOND FLOOR CEILINGScale: 1/8" : 1' - 0'
A9
FRAMING PLAN - ROOF TOPS Scale: 1/8" : 1' - 0'
A9
7" RISE
12" RUN
4" RISE
12" RUN
7" RISE
12" RUN
GENERAL NOTES
NOTE:STEEL I-JOIST11 3/4" DEPTH
CONTRACTOR TO INSPECT
LENGTHS ON SITE
DE
SC
RIP
TIO
NFR
AM
E PL
AN
S
DR
AW
N B
YAN
DR
E VASC
ON
CEL
OS
RE
-IS
SU
E08
.09.
08
ISS
UE
08.0
8.08
CLI
EN
TM
R.
MS.
LEO
NE
25 C
LEVEL
AN
D A
VE.
EV
ERET
T, M
A,
0214
9 PH
ON
E: 6
17 3
1227
40
IND
EP
EN
DE
NT
PR
AC
TIC
EBO
STO
N A
RC
HIT
ECTU
RAL
CO
LLEG
E U
ND
ER S
UPE
RVIS
ION
OF
FACU
LTY
PR
OJE
CT
CR
AFT
SM
AN
SIN
GLE
FA
MIL
Y D
WEL
LIN
G
PR
OJE
CT
NO
.24
5.17
0
A
9' 0
"11
' 0"
12' 0" 8' 0" 12' 0"
10' 0
"10
' 0"
8' 0" 6' 0" 12' 6"
10' 0
"10
' 4"
6' 8
"
19' 11"13' 10"
18' 5
"14
' 6"
11' 6
"
12' 0
"12
' 0"
13' 3" 7' 8" 5' 0" 8' 1"
NOTE:TRIPLE I-LEVEL LVL,
OR (COMPARABLE)11 3/4" DEPTH
CONTRACTOR TO INSPECT LENGTHS
ON SITE
NOTE:TRIPLE I-LEVEL LVL,
OR (COMPARABLE)11 3/4" DEPTH
CONTRACTOR TO INSPECT LENGTHS
ON SITE
NOTE:TRIPLE I-LEVEL LVL,
OR (COMPARABLE)11 3/4" DEPTH
CONTRACTOR TO INSPECT LENGTHS
ON SITE
NOTE:ROOFING
COVERAGE ESTIMATED AS
3,350 SQ. F.
NOTE: FRAMING DESIGN CALLS FOR NOMINAL:
2 X 6 WALL STUD @16 OC1/2" STRUCTURAL PLYWOOD UNDERFLOOR/SHEATHING12" DEPTH LVL ALL HEADERS, 12" TJI FLOOR CEILING JOISTS, 12" DEPTH DOUBLED LVL BEAMS,12" LUMBER ROOF GABLE DESIGN W/ LVL COMBINATION AROUND PERIMETER OF STRUCTURE 12" DEPTH STEEL (IF ANY NECESSARY)
FRAMING CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL BEAM AND JOISTS SIZES ON SITE, THE DESIGN BEAM CALCULATIONS CALLS FOR MINIMUM 40 PSF LIVE LOAD & 10 PSF DEAD LOADS. INSTALL ALL BEAMS AND FLOOR JOISTS ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS AND ALL APPLICABLE BUILDING CODESPERFORM THE WORK AND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SAME
12X16 TJI COUNT ARE ESTIMATED AS 110 UNITS PER FLOOR
12X16 LVL COUNT ARE ESTIMATED AS 40 UNITS PER FLOOR
DO NOT RELY SOLELY ON THIS ESTIMATION
8' 9
"26
' 8"
18' 6
"
34' 0" 27' 3"
1' 4
"
2'
2'
11' 6" 13' 9"
NOTE:SHEAR LOAD STABILIZER
+/- 35 DEGREESALL CORNERS
15' 6
"11
' 2"
11' 2
"
11
GENERAL NOTES
GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL BEAM AND JOISTS SIZES, PROVIDE BEAM CALCULATIONS TO BUILDING INSPECTOR AND INSTALL ALL BEAMS AND FLOOR JOISTS ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS AND ALL APPLICABLE BUILDING CODESPERFORM THE WORK AND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SAME
DE
SC
RIP
TIO
NSEC
TIO
N D
ETAIL
S
DR
AW
N B
YAN
DR
E VASC
ON
CEL
OS
RE
-IS
SU
E08
.09.
08
ISS
UE
08.0
8.08
CLI
EN
TM
R.
MS.
LEO
NE
25 C
LEVEL
AN
D A
VE.
EV
ERET
T, M
A,
0214
9 PH
ON
E: 6
17 3
1227
40
IND
EP
EN
DE
NT
PR
AC
TIC
EBO
STO
N A
RC
HIT
ECTU
RAL
CO
LLEG
E U
ND
ER S
UPE
RVIS
ION
OF
FACU
LTY
PR
OJE
CT
CR
AFT
SM
AN
SIN
GLE
FA
MIL
Y D
WEL
LIN
G
PR
OJE
CT
NO
.24
5.17
0
AFRAMING SECTION DETAIL - WEST ELEVATION
Scale: 1/2" : 1' - 0'
A11
FOOTING
CONCRETE FOUNDATION WALLASPHALTIC DAMP PROOF & POLYSTYRENE
FOAM BOARD MINIMUM 1/2" THICK ALL FOUNDATION WALL
BELOW GRADE
LVL 11 3/4" DEPTH
R 19 FIBER GLASSINSULATION ON WALL
AND CEILINGS
LVL 11 3/4" DEPTHWINDOW HEADERS
2 X 6 LUMBER 16" OCTROUGH OUT FRAME
UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED
WALL PLATE
3/4" I-LEVEL UNDERLAYMENTSTRUCTURAL PLYWOOD
NAILED TO FLOOR JOISTS(ALL FLOORS)
LVL 11 3/4" DEPTH
1' 4"
2 X 10 RAFTERSWITH BIRD'S PEAK
ASSEMBLY
SOY FOAM INSULATION R 40FOR BOTH SIDES OF LOWER ROOFTOPS
2 X 6 KNEE WALL
2 X 10 RAFTERSWITH BIRDS BEAK
ASSEMBLY
2 X 12 RIDGE
2 X 10 DECK FRAME
(TYP.) 4" X 4" X 9' COLUNM
2 X12 RIM JOIST
SLAB
GRADE
8' 0
"1'
9'
0"
1'8'
0"
1'5'
0"
1'7'
0"
- 5'-0" A.S.L.
BELOW GRADESLAB LEVEL ELEVATION
3'-0" A.S.L.
TOP OF FLOOR ELEVATION
0'-0" A.S.L.
GRADE LEVEL ELEVATION
1'
13'-0" A.S.L.
TOP OF FLOOR ELEVATION
22'-0" A.S.L.
TOP OF ATTIC FLOOR ELEVATION
36'-0" A.S.L.
ROOF TOP - HIGHEST ELEVATION
27'-0" A.S.L.
AVERAGE ELEVATION
1' 6"
ROOF OVERHANG ALL BUILDING
GARAGE SLAB SECTION DETAIL Scale: 1 1/2" : 1' - 0'
A11
8"
1' 4"
9"
BASEMENT SLAB SECTION DETAIL Scale: 1 1/2" : 1' - 0'
A11
CONTINUOS REBAR
VERTICAL REBAR 48" O.C.
REBAR MID SPAN
REBAR 3" BELOW TOP
12" CONCRETE SLAB
COMPACTED GRAVEL
5/8" ANCHOR BOLT
11 3/4" TJI JOIST
3/4" STRUCTURAL ENGINEERED PLYWOOD
1/2" DRYWALL
SHEAR WALL TYP.
SIDING
TYVEK VAPOR BARRIER
1/2" OSB PLY.
8" M
IN.
1' 0
"
ASPHALTIC MEMBRANE BELOW GRADE
1' 4"
1' 4"
18" FROST LINE SUPER TUFF-R POLYISOCYANURATE RIDIG FOAM INSULATION
10"
10" THICKNESS CONCRETE FOUNDATION WALL
METAL DRIP CAP
1' 6
"
COMPACTED GRAVELUNDER 8" CONCRETE SLAB
GENERAL NOTES
NOTE: FRAMING DESIGN CALLS FOR NOMINAL:
2 X 6 WALL STUD @16 OC1/2" STRUCTURAL PLYWOOD UNDERFLOOR/SHEATHING12" DEPTH LVL ALL HEADERS, 12" TJI FLOOR CEILING JOISTS, 12" DEPTH DOUBLED LVL BEAMS,12" DEPTH RIM JOIST LVL BEAMS,12" LUMBER ROOF GABLE DESIGN W/ LVL COMBINATION AROUND PERIMETER OF STRUCTURE 12" DEPTH STEEL (IF ANY NECESSARY)
PROJECT DOCUMENTATION PART II
INDEPENDENT PRACTICESUPERVISOR | DIGIORGIO + BRACCIOTI 2010 - 2011 STONEHAM HOUSE PROJECT
P.66
HYPOTHESISACADEMIC ONLY::::LEN CHARNEY:::: THE DIRECTOR OF THE PRACTICE DEPARTMENT AT THE BOSTON ARCHITECTURAL COLLEGE CHALLENGED ME TO ACADEMICALLY CONVEY THE STONEHAM PROJECT WITH NO REAL-LIFE CONSTRAINTS OTHER THAN THE SITE CONSTRAINTS.
PERSPECTIVE
SOUTH ELEVATION
NORTH ELEVATION
AERIAL PERSPECTIVE
WEST PERSPECTIVE
EAST ELEVATION
FOOD
INDEPENDENT PRACTICESUPERVISOR | DIGIORGIO + BRACCIOTI 2010 - 2011 STONEHAM HOUSE PROJECT
THE END