Independent Development Evaluation
From experience to knowledge... From knowledge to action... From action to impact
African Development Bank
An ID
EV C
ount
ry S
trat
egy
Eval
uatio
n
January 2016
Senegal: Evaluation of the Bank's Country
Strategy and Program
2004–2013Summary Report
IDEV conducts different types of evaluations — to achieve its
strategic objectives
Thematic Evaluations Project Cluster Evaluations
Regional Integration Stra
tegy
Evaluations
Project Perfo
rmance Evaluations
(Public Secto
r)Impact Evaluations
Project Performance Evaluations
(Private Sector)
Coun
try S
trate
gy E
valu
atio
n
Evaluation Syntheses
Corporate Evaluations
Sect
or E
valu
atio
ns
Coun
try
Stra
tegy
Eva
luat
ions
January 2016
An ID
EV C
ount
ry S
trat
egy
Eval
uatio
n
Independent Development Evaluation
From experience to knowledge... From knowledge to action... From action to impact
African Development Bank
Senegal: Evaluation of the Bank's Country
Strategy and Program
2004–2013Summary Report
Acknowledgements
This report was prepared by Debazou Yantio, Evaluation Team Leader, and Mabarakissa Diomandé, Evaluation Officer, under the supervision of Samer Hachem, Division Manager. The broad guidelines were provided by Rakesh Nangia, Evaluator-General. It drew on sector evaluations conducted by Mrs. Cynthia Bleu-Lainé (Energy), and Messrs. Amadou Wade Diagne (Social Development), Alioune Diallo (Water and Sanitation), Mame Birame Diouf (Agriculture and Rural Development), Alain Rakotomavo (Transport Infrastructure) and Moctar Sow (Governance).
Mr. Harcel Nana, Junior Consultant, and Mrs. Wiem Bekir, interim, also respectively facilitated the preparation and quantitative analysis of the Bank portfolio's database, as well as the collection of relevant information on the operations concerned. Mrs. Imen Trabelsi, Mrs. Ruby Adzobu-Agyare, Mrs. Myrtha Diop and Mrs. Meriem Dridi from IDEV also provided the evaluation team with administrative support.
The evaluation team would like to thank the team from the Bank's Senegal Field Office (SNFO) which played a key role in the organization and conduct of the exercise under the leadership of Lamine N’Dongo, the Resident Representative, and also made relevant comments on the draft reports. Toussaint Houeninvo, Robert Eguida, Diery Gueye, Binta Diallo Diagne, Marie Claude Correa-Sarr and Ousseynou Ndiaye, in particular, provided wide-ranging assistance during missions to the country.
Internal and external peer reviewers made useful comments, which were taken into account in the finalization of the evaluation. The peer reviewers included Claudine Voyadzis, external, and Clément Banse, from IDEV.
The evaluation team wishes to express its gratitude to the Government of Senegal, to local elected officials and to all those who gave interviews and /or provided comments.
The publication of this report was coordinated by David Akana, Communications and Knowledge Management Specialist
IDEV is solely responsible for the contents of this report.
© 2016 African Development Bank Group All rights reserved – Published January 2016
Senegal: Evaluation of the Bank's Country Strategy and Program 2004–2013 Summary Report, January 2016
DisclaimerUnless expressly stated otherwise, the findings, interpretations and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the various authors of the publication and are not necessarily those of the Management of the African Development Bank (the “Bank”) and the African Development Fund (the “Fund”), Boards of Directors, Boards of Governors or the countries they represent.Use of this publication is at the reader’s sole risk. The content of this publication is provided without warranty of any kind, either express or implied, including without limitation warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, and non- infringement of third-party rights. The Bank specifically does not make any warranties or representations as to the accuracy, completeness, reliability or current validity of any information contained in the publication. Under no circumstances including, but not limited to, negligence, shall the Bank be liable for any loss, damage, liability or expense incurred or suffered which is claimed to result directly or indirectly from use of this publication or reliance on its content.This publication may contain advice, opinions, and statements of various information and content providers. The Bank does not represent or endorse the accuracy, completeness, reliability or current validity of any advice, opinion, statement or other information provided by any information or content provider or other person or entity. Reliance upon any such opinion, advice, statement, or other information shall also be at the reader’s own risk.
About the AfDBThe overarching objective of the African Development Bank Group is to spur sustainable economic development and social progress in its regional member countries (RMCs), thus contributing to poverty reduction. The Bank Group achieves this objective by mobilizing and allocating resources for investment in RMCs and providing policy advice and technical assistance to support development efforts.
About Independent Development Evaluation (IDEV)The mission of Independent Development Evaluation at the AfDB is to enhance the development effectiveness of the institution in its regional member countries through independent and instrumental evaluations and partnerships for sharing knowledge.
Independent Development Evaluation (IDEV)African Development Bank GroupAvenue Joseph Anoma 01 BP 1387, Abidjan 01 Côte d’IvoirePhone: +225 20 26 20 41Fax: +225 20 21 31 00E-mail: [email protected]
Design & layout: CRÉON – www.creondesign.net IDEV Layout and Design Task Manager: Felicia Avwontom Original language: French – Translation: AfDB Language Services Department
Acknowledgements iiAbbreviations and Acronyms vExecutive Summary 1Management’s Response 5
Introduction 14Evaluation Goal and Objectives 14Methodological Approach 15Limitations of the Evaluation 15
Country Context Between 2004 and 2013 16Country's Main Development Challenges between 2004 and 2013 16The Country's Development Strategy over the Period 17
Bank Assistance Strategies and Programs 2004 - 2013 19
Evaluation Results of Bank Strategies and Programs 25Relevance, Selectivity and Strategic Positioning 25Effectiveness 27Efficiency 31Sustainability 34Cross-Cutting Aspects 37Bank Performance 37Country Performance 40
Conclusions and Recommendations 43Annexes 47
Contents
Contents
List of figuresFigure1 Levels of Analysis (of Results) 14Figure 2 Theory of Change, 2002-2004 Country Strategy Paper 20Figure 3 Theory of Change, 2005-2009 Country Strategy Paper 21Figure 4 Theory of Change, 2010-2015 Country Strategy Paper 22Figure 5 Project Distribution by Funding Window (commitments in UA) 23Figure 6 Project Distribution by Sector (commitments in UA) 23Figure 7 Access to Drinking Water and Sanitation in Senegal, 2004-2012 31
List of tablesTable 1 Performance Rating 25Table 2 Effectiveness Rating 27Table 3 Health Sector Outcome Indicators 32Table 4 Status of Elementary Education 32Table 5 Efficiency Rating 33Table 6 Sustainability Rating 35Table 7 Public-Private Partnership (PPP) in Senegal 40
List of boxesBox 1 Sarya Locality is no longer isolated 28Box 2 Some institutions and structures established as part
of the good governance reforms 29Box 3 ASUFOR Federation: a Model for the Sustainability
of Water and Sanitation Infrastructure? 36
vAbbreviations and Acronyms
An ID
EV C
ount
ry S
trat
egy
Eval
uatio
n
Abbreviations and Acronyms
ACAB Budget Support Framework Arrangement
ACFA Accelerated Co-financing Facility for Africa
AfDB African Development Bank
ADEPME Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Development and Supervision Agency
ADF African Development Fund
AIBD Blaise Diagne International Airport
AIDS Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome
ANSD National Statistics and Demographic Agency
APIX Investment Promotion Agency
ASER Rural Electrification Agency of Senegal
ASUFOR Borehole Users’ Association
AWFF African Water Facility Special Fund
BNDE National Economic Development Bank (former FPE)
BOM Organization and Methods Office
BOS Operational Monitoring Bureau of Senegal Emerging Plan
BTOR Back-to-Office Report
CCPTF Technical and Financial Partners' Consultative Committee
CEDR Comprehensive Evaluation of the African Development Bank’s Development Results
CFAF Franc of the African Financial Community
CPE Country Program Evaluation
CPIA Country Policy and Institutional Assessment
CRSE Electricity Sector Regulatory Commission
CRZ Zootechnical Research Centre
CSP Country Strategy Paper
CSPE Country Strategy and Program Evaluation
DCEF Department of Economic and Financial Cooperation
DCR Development Co-operation Report
DGF Directorate-General of Finance
DGID Directorate-General of Taxation and Government Property
DPEE Department of Forecasting and Economic Studies
DWSS Drinking Water Supply and Sanitation
ECOWAS Economic Community of West African States
FAK Kalounayes ASUFOR Federation
FAO Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
FAPA Fund for African Private Sector Assistance
FERA Autonomous Road Maintenance Fund
FPE Economic Promotion Fund
GAFSP Global Agriculture and Food Security Program
GDPRD Global Platform for Rural Development
HIV Human Immunodeficiency Virus
IA Schools Inspectorate
ICT Information and Communication Technologies
IDEN National Education Departmental Inspectorate
IDEV Independent Development Evaluation
IEC Information Education Communication
IFAD International Fund for Agricultural Development
IMF Intensified Mixed Farming
IMF International Monetary Fund
IPP Independent Power Producer
IPRR Implementation Progress and Results Report
IREF Regional Water and Forestry Inspectorate
IWRMAP Integrated Water Resources Management Action Plan
vi Senegal: Evaluation of the Bank's Country Strategy and Program 2004–2013 Summary Report
IWRM Integrated Water Resources Management
KWh Kilowatt-hour
LI Labour Intensive
LOLF Organic Law on Finance Laws
MDG Millennium Development Goal
MEFP Ministry of the Economy, Finance and Planning
MTR Mid-Term Review
OECD Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development
OFOR Rural Boreholes Board
ORQR Quality Assurance and Results Department
PACICE Inclusive Growth Support Project
PADERBA Anambe Rural Development Project
PADERCA Casamance Rural Development Project
PAIRF Revenue Offices Support Project
PAMOCA Land Registration Modernization Support Project
PAPEL Livestock Support Project
PAPIL Local Small-Scale Irrigation Support Program
PAR Project Appraisal Report
PARE Economic Reform Support Program
PASRP Poverty Reduction Strategy Support Project
PCR Project Completion Report
PEPAM Millennium Drinking Water and Sanitation Program
PIU Project Implementation Unit
PNDL National Local Development Program
PNIR National Rural Infrastructure Program
PPC/PNDL Community Roads Program
PPC/PNIR Community Roads Program
PPP Public-Private Partnership
PPRR Portfolio Performance Review Report
PREFELAG Project for Restoration of Ecological and Economic Functions of Lake Guiers
PROGEBE Project for Sustainable Management of Endemic Ruminant Livestock
PRSP Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper
PSE Emerging Senegal Plan
RMF Results Measurement Framework
RUT Road User Tax
SAP Systems, Applications & Products in Data Processing®
SENELEC National Electricity Company of Senegal
SME Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises
SMTEF Sector Medium-Term Expenditure Framework
SNDES National Economic and Social Development Strategy
SNEEG National Gender Equality and Equity Strategy
SNFO Senegal Regional Office
SODAGRI Agricultural and Industrial Development Company of Senegal
SODEFITEX Textile Fibre Development Company
STI Sexually Transmitted Infections
TEU Twenty-Foot Equivalent Unit
UA Unit of Account
USD United States Dollar
WAEMU West African Economic and Monetary Union
1Executive Summary
An ID
EV C
ount
ry S
trat
egy
Eval
uatio
n
Executive Summary
Evaluation Goal and MethodologyAs a key component of the Comprehensive Evaluation of the African Development Bank’s Development Results (CEDR), this evaluation measures the relevance, effectiveness, sustainability and efficiency of Bank Group assistance to Senegal over the period, as well as the institutional performances of the Borrower and the Bank between 2004 and 2013. The Government, civil society and the other actors concerned hope to learn lessons that will be reflected in the design and smooth implementation of the Bank's 2016-2020 Country Strategy Paper (CSP) for Senegal. A summary report has been prepared on six evaluations conducted by independent consultants in each of the six priority sectors: (a) transport; (b) governance (multi-sector); (c) agriculture and rural development; (d) energy; (e) water and sanitation; and (f) social development (education and health). The data was collected from a documentary review, consultations with experts, and quick surveys on the intervention sites during which there were individual and group discussions, consultation workshops and direct observation.
Country Context and Development ChallengesThe most westerly point on Africa's Atlantic seaboard is located on the Cap-Vert Peninsula in Dakar, and this offers Senegal an opportunity to play a greater role in regional and international shipping. Dakar alone is home to 55% of the 13 million Senegalese, 51% of whom are women and 43.4% people under 15 years of age. Over the past ten years, real GDP has grown by 3-4% which is below the 7% target to take into account exponential population growth and achievement of the Millennium Development Goals. The number of poor people in the country has therefore been rising steadily since 2006. Senegal's economy faces the
following major challenges: high cost of labour; an institutional and regulatory framework with insufficient incentive (administrative red-tape, corruption); legal insecurity, especially in land ownership; lack of road, rail, port, energy, water and sanitation infrastructure; relatively little financing of local businesses by the national banking system; an economy over-focused on services; a structural current account deficit partly due to the fact that services are not easily exported and to imported inflation fueled by a combination of sluggish agricultural productivity and strong demand for food products. The economy is also exposed to external shocks, in particular, oil price fluctuations, the threat of locusts, irregular rainfall and frequent floods, which increase the vulnerability of agricultural production.
Bank Assistance Strategy and Program for the Country between 2004 and 2013Over the 2004-2013 period, the Government prepared several successive economic and financial programs which provided a basis for dialogue with the Bank. Three Country Strategy Papers (2002-2004, 2005-2009 and 2010-2015) were prepared on the basis of the Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSP) I and II, the National Economic and Social Development Strategy (SNDES) and its update, and the Emerging Senegal Plan (PSE). Between 2004 and 2013, the Bank approved 32 operations, amounting to about UA 525.9 million, in six priority sectors or pillars: transport (38%), public sector or governance reform (20%), agriculture and rural development (15%), electric power (12%), water and sanitation (11%) and social development (4%) in women's and youth employment. Eight operations, completed or closed between 20091 and 2013, have been included in the evaluation to take into account all the results achieved by the Bank. The evaluation thus covers 40 operations
2 Senegal: Evaluation of the Bank's Country Strategy and Program 2004–2013 Summary Report
in the 3 successive CSPs over the 2014-2013 period. Despite its declared intention in certain CSPs, the Bank has carried out little economic and sector work, but has focused on project preparation studies and environmental impact assessments.
Evaluation Results of Bank Strategies and Programs
RelevanceRelevance is fairly satisfactory. The Bank has successfully aligned its operational program with the Government's development policy priorities and the expectations of the population and economic agents, thanks mainly to the Results-Based CSP framework, the clarity of the government's priorities, and the practice of consultation including the private sector and non-State actors. However, it lacks selectivity and its strategic positioning does not stem from a deliberate choice.
EffectivenessEffectiveness is fairly satisfactory. Sector performances are variable. Most of the objectives were achieved in terms of physical outputs. However, these outputs did not always produce the desired development outcomes. Despite difficult operating conditions, the transport infrastructure helped to improve urban mobility and cross-border trade, as well as develop local economies in rural areas. Public management reforms helped to establish good governance structures and institutions. However, implementation of the reforms remains erratic in some administrations. Irrigation schemes and multifaceted support to farmers and stockbreeders have increased sown areas and local production. Nevertheless, a general decline in yields has been observed. The water and sanitation facilities established have not helped to achieve the set objectives. The electric power generation and distribution initiatives have been implemented but operational difficulties, particularly outages, have prevented households and businesses from obtaining low-cost electric power. Classrooms
and health centres have been constructed, and health care and community supervisory personnel trained, but the structures have flaws.
EfficiencyEfficiency is fairly unsatisfactory. Cost overruns are almost systematic in the construction of health care facilities and are sources of dissatisfaction. The same applies to the energy sector where the slippage on start-up of the Sendou coal-fired power plant has resulted in significant additional costs despite lower unit and supervision costs. The poor performance of the Dakar Sanitation Project has affected the efficiency of the Bank's portfolio in the water and sanitation sector where the unit cost of drinking water supply is, however, at the midpoint level of performance by Senegal's other partners. Coordination and management costs represent on average 10.61% of the total cost of governance projects, below the reference standard of 13% for the other multilateral donors. Operations in the sector have not been seriously affected by delays due to the Bank's presence in Dakar, regular mobilization of counterpart funds, and responsiveness of actors in the MEFP whenever project implementation units (PIUs) are anchored in that Ministry. Similarly, the anchoring of PIUs in oversight structures and the involvement of decentralized service staff have facilitated implementation and contributed to savings through sharing of operating costs in agriculture and rural development. However, there is a time lag of 6 to 8 months between loan signature and effectiveness because of problems relating to non-fulfilment of the conditions precedent. Average project management costs are below the reference standard, with the exception of the Invasive Aquatic Weeds Control Project.
SustainabilitySustainability is fairly probable. Sustainability is fairly probable in the transport sector due to unpredictability of the State budget contribution to the Autonomous Road Maintenance Fund. In the
3Executive Summary
An ID
EV C
ount
ry S
trat
egy
Eval
uatio
n
energy sector, the gradual reduction of government tariff compensation could help to achieve financial viability. Arrangements for ensuring maintenance of water and sanitation structures are inadequate. In the governance sector, reform measures are not applied comprehensively and thoroughly by the public administrations. In education and health, defects, design flaws and lack of training for staff in the use and maintenance of ultra-modern equipment makes sustainability of the facilities improbable.
Performance of Partners Bank performance is fairly satisfactory. Since the opening of its Regional Office in 2005, the Bank has intensified advisory services and technical assistance through more responsive direct contacts, facilitated dialogue with the authorities and non-State actors, and helped the Government to adopt more efficient practices. It has contributed to the inclusion of disadvantaged groups, particularly women and youths, by creating jobs and new income-generating activity opportunities in priority sectors. However, the beneficiaries are often unaware of the Bank's achievements due to lack of communication. The Bank has supported the transition to green growth through climate change mitigation and adaptation measures in the agriculture sector. The Bank has also established itself in its role as driver of private investment through PPPs. However, knowledge management is not yet systematic, and cumbersome procedures impact negatively on the Bank's performance.The performance of the Senegalese Government is fairly satisfactory. The country has clear strategic priorities, which have produced tangible results. However, difficulties relating to mobilization of counterpart funds, slippage on the fulfilment of the conditions precedent to the first disbursement, as well as start-up of activities have affected this performance. Aid coordination by the Government has been strengthened, and it consults non-State actors, particularly the private sector and civil society.
RecommendationsStrengthen the Bank's strategic positioning. Greater selectivity of intervention areas, based on adequate analytical studies, is recommended to allow the Bank to optimize its development outcomes. As regards transformation of local economies and poverty reduction, the Bank could, by targeting specific areas: (i) invest in the development of rural roads which will complement the main highways; as well as (ii) seize the existing opportunities for public-private partnerships (PPP) to increase its driver effect in the areas of energy, water and sanitation, agriculture and rural development. With respect to governance, deepening of ongoing reforms and support for more effective operation of facilities and institutions could have more significant impact and help the country tp make further progress, especially as regards the business environment.Ensure sustainability of infrastructure. For roads, in particular, one area for dialogue with the Government is the establishment of a mechanism that will ensure timely State budget contribution to the Autonomous Road Maintenance Fund to comply with the annual Road Maintenance Program. Furthermore, closer involvement of community-based organizations in the management of local infrastructure should be considered in the implementation of the Bank's procedures not only in terms of consultation but also of participation in management through the award of contracts.Improve effectiveness of project/program supervision through three complementary actions: (i) assist the Government in establishing an efficient national results-based monitoring/evaluation system which could also provide the Bank with reliable data on implementation performance and development outcomes; (ii) organize supervision missions to cover all relevant aspects, including stricter monitoring of implementation of environmental management plans and quality control to prevent the numerous physical defects noted in some structures; and (iii) ensure compliance with the implementation of supervision mission recommendations.
Photo/ Présidence de la République du Sénégal
The Dakar-Diamniadio Highway services Diamniadio, which is a new development pole established by the Government to encourage private businesses to set up shop there. The travel time (between Dakar and Diamniadio) has dropped from 90 minutes in 2008 to 30 minutes in 2014.
5Management’s Response
An ID
EV C
ount
ry S
trat
egy
Eval
uatio
n
Management’s Response
Management received with satisfaction the outcome of the Independent Development Evaluation (IDEV) of Bank Group’s assistance in Senegal over the 2004-2013 period, and its contribution to the country’s development. The aim of the evaluation is to contribute to enhancing the Bank’s effectiveness and credibility. The report highlighted the need to emphasize infrastructure quality control and envisage suitable procurement procedures when rural communities are involved. It also stressed the importance of maintaining enough staffing in Field Office to match the size of the Bank’s portfolio in light of the Office’s regional coverage. Furthermore, the report pointed to the need to systematize the capitalisation and management of knowledge emanating from operations executed and to disseminate information on Bank achievements, especially in rural areas. The various conclusions and recommendations will be taken into account when preparing the Bank’s new assistance strategy in Senegal (2016-2020) and operations arising therefrom.
Introduction
The evaluation involved measuring the relevance, effectiveness, efficiency and sustainability of Bank operations over the 2004-2013 period. It also allowed for an assessment of the institutional performance of the Borrower and the Bank. The evaluation drew from past evaluations of the following six sectors: (i) transport; (ii) governance; (iii) agriculture and rural development; (iv) energy; (v) water and sanitation; and (vi) social development (education and health). The evaluation focused on three Country Strategy Papers (CSPs) – 2002-2004, 2005-2009 and 2010-2015. This ex-post evaluation exercise enabled the Bank to draw lessons that were taken into consideration during the preparation of the new 2016-2020 CSP and in the selection of priority areas of intervention and future operations in Senegal.
Relevance
Management is pleased that the Bank successfully and satisfactorily aligned its intervention program on the Government’s development policy priorities
and on the expectations of the people and economic agents. The evaluation further states that the Bank’s assistance was designed to match the Government’s priorities that barely changed during the period, among which private sector development for accelerated growth, as well as deployment of infrastructure to open access to various basic economic and social services and reduce poverty. Further, the country strategies for the 2004-2013 period reflect the Bank’s operational priorities. It should be pointed out that in a bid to align its interventions with national development priorities, the 2010-2015 CSP mid-term review took into consideration the concerns of the new authorities that assumed office following the 2012 elections as well as the thrusts of the Ten-Year Strategy (2013-2022) adopted by the Bank in April 2013. This led the Bank to slightly modify the 2010-2015 CSP pillars.
Management shares IDEV’s view that in a bid to maintain flexibility, the principle of selectivity was not always followed.
Drawing lessons from this experience, the next CSP (2016-2020) will ensure selectivity in alignment
6 Senegal: Evaluation of the Bank's Country Strategy and Program 2004–2013 Summary Report
and flexibility. Hence, the CSP (2016-2020) will be aligned on the priorities of the National Development Strategy as defined in the Emerging Senegal Plan (Plan Sénégal emergent). It will reflect the priorities of the Bank’s Ten-Year Strategy as well as the five key institutional priorities (High Fives): feed Africa, light up and power Africa, industrialize Africa, integrate Africa and improve quality of life for the people of Africa. Selectivity of areas of intervention and complementarity with other development partners also figure prominently among other guiding principles of the new CSP (2016-2020).
Management acknowledges that the Bank’s strategic positioning should be coordinated more effectively.
The Bank was very active in the high level policy dialogue with the Government through the Extended Group of Technical and Financial Partners (G50), in line with the Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness and the Busan Partnership. The Bank served as spokesperson of TFPs vis-à-vis the political authorities. It co-chaired the G50 for two years with USAID and Belgium, respectively. The Bank is also active in several thematic groups. Specifically, it has since 2011 either chaired or been vice-chair of three such groups: chair of the ACAB Group (budget support) and co-chair of the Statistics Group with the United Nations Fund for Population Affairs (UNFPA). It led the Energy Thematic Group until end 2014, and participated actively in the auto-evaluation of aid coordination mechanisms, which was conducted when it co-chaired the G50.
It is worth noting that the partner landscape in Senegal has hardly evolved in recent years. Most international cooperation actors are "traditional" partners of the Development Aid Committee. The Bank actively coordinates aid with these actors. Therefore, in its interventions, the Bank has always favoured collaboration with other TFPs. In this regard, it co-financed such infrastructure as the Dakar-Diamniadio Highway, the Blaise Daigne
Airport, the OMGV Project, etc. In the case of the OMGV Project, it assumed the role of lead agency among the TFPs and brought the financing package to closure by taking charge of all components that other partners did not finance. The Bank also funds large infrastructure projects as the Government’s local partner, particularly in the case of public-private partnership projects.
Effectiveness
Management acknowledges that the objectives were achieved, even if some achievements did not always translate into development outcomes.
Management is pleased with the satisfactory results obtained in the transport sector and the fairly satisfactory results in “agriculture and rural development”, “social development” and “governance”. It welcomes the improvement of productivity at the Dakar Port thanks to the new container terminal completed in March 2012. In this connection, the major achievements concern the increase in the volume of container traffic which rose from 273,000 Twenty-Foot Equivalent Units (TEU) in 2008 to 417,800 TEU in 2014, i.e. an 85% increase. Another gain pertains to the substantial reduction in the vessel-waiting times at the terminal from 15 hours to less than 2 hours, and the delivery or container-reception waiting time from 100 to 23 minutes. Also concerning the transport sector, the evaluation noted improvements in mobility in the Cap Vert peninsula brought about by the Dakar-Diamniadio Highway. Moreover, the said highway services Diamniadio, which is a new development pole established by the Government to encourage private businesses to set up shop there. The travel time (between Dakar and Diamniadio) has dropped from 90 minutes in 2008 to 30 minutes in 2014. The evaluation pointed out the improvement of connectivity between Dakar, the hinterland and neighbouring countries, thanks to the establishment of corridors and built and/or
7Management’s Response
An ID
EV C
ount
ry S
trat
egy
Eval
uatio
n
rehabilitated roads. The corresponding time gain stands at 22.5 minutes per 10 km for light vehicles and 31.4 minutes per 10 km for trucks. On the rehabilitated earth roads, the speed has increased from 15 km/h to 60 km/h for light vehicles, and from 10 km/h to 50 km/h for trucks, i.e. a time gain of 30 and 48 minutes, respectively. Vehicle operating costs have dropped from 17 to 9% (deteriorated paved roads) and from 56 to 40% (deteriorated earth roads), thanks to the construction of new roads. Furthermore, the population’s wellbeing has improved, thanks to greater access to such basic social services as health education and healthcare, and the development of opportunities for income-generating activities.
The Bank will continue to prioritize transport development in the next CSP, with a view to the structural transformation of the economy, particularly through the development of agricultural value chains and trade in processed agricultural produce. This will help to consolidate the achievements of Bank interventions in the sector and create further economic opportunities through the development of the agricultural and industrial sectors. It will also contribute to improving the people’s living conditions, especially by offering them better access to basic social services and creating jobs.
With regard to public management and the business environment, Management appreciates the conclusions of the evaluation according to which the Bank’s assistance in this area helped to set up institutions and structures geared towards: (i) enhancing the effectiveness of public outfits that offer services to private enterprises; (ii) developing results-based public management; and (iii) increasing the participation of the private sector in the national economy.
Management is pleased with the positive impacts of its operations on improving Senegal’s governance performance, rated 3rd in West Africa and 9th on
the Continent, according to the Mo Ibrahim Index of African Governance. As concerns the business environment, Management is encouraged by the improvement of the Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) rating from 3.9 in 2004 to 4.4 in 2013. The same applies to the decline in the cost and time of starting a business between 2004 and 2013 (43% fall in the cost of starting a business and a 90% drop in time required). Furthermore, between 2004 and 2012, foreign direct investment (FDI) increased from less than USD 64 million to USD 271 million, i.e. a 325% hike. In addition, the evaluation showed that the cadastral departments were equipped with adequate technical hardware; the timeframe for providing services to users was reduced; and property tax was consolidated. Management shares the view according to which more effort is needed, particularly in terms of accountability and citizen participation. Further progress should also be made to mobilize property tax.
Evaluation of the effectiveness of Bank interventions in agriculture and rural development activities were deemed moderately satisfactory. Management appreciates the fact that the evaluation highlighted an 86% increase in production, thanks to which local needs were covered for periods ranging from 5 to 8 months, or even 12 months in some cases. Management is pleased that the PADERCA Project allowed for the development of 14 100 ha of land compared to the 13 500 ha expected, i.e. a 104% achievement rate. This led to the production of 41 163 tonnes of cereal and 2 525 tonnes of vegetables for 2014 only, thus contributing to food security. Thanks to the improvement of livestock production systems, PROGEBE generated a total production of 1 776 000 litres of milk. PAPIL built more than 200 structures and other infrastructure in the Fatick, Kedougou, Kolda, Kaolack and Tambacounda regions. This infrastructure helped to reclaim 3 263 ha of salt flats and the rehabilitate 1 159 ha of land. Within the PPC/PNIR framework, more than 1 200 km of rural roads were built in 84 rural communities,
8 Senegal: Evaluation of the Bank's Country Strategy and Program 2004–2013 Summary Report
thus contributing to the improvement of the living conditions of more than 1 500 000 beneficiaries.
Within the context of the next CSP, the Bank will pursue its interventions in the agricultural and rural sector, with a view to contributing to transforming the country’s agriculture as part of the structural transformation of the economy that will lead Senegal towards economic emergence.
Management recognizes that more effort should be made to produce and supply electricity in Senegal at affordable prices. In 2011, the economic cost of outages was estimated at 1.4% of GDP. Management acknowledges the difficulties underscored by the evaluation in connection with the Rural Electrification Project where achievements were far below the objectives, as well as the delays recorded for works on the Sendou Coal Power Plant. Now that issues between Sendou’s major shareholders have been resolved, the plant would in time meet 45% of the annual electricity demand and reduce the actual cost of electricity by 20%.
Management has taken note that effectiveness in the water and sanitation sector was deemed unsatisfactory. This is mostly attributable to the poor performance of the Dakar Sanitation Project which reduced the efficiency of the water and sanitation portfolio, even though the drinking water supply unit cost is at the median of the performance grid of Senegal’s other partners. However, apart from this operation, subsequent Bank projects in the sector (PEPAM-I, PEPAM-II, PSEA) were more effective and today, the sector is among the best organized in Senegal. Between 2005 and 2015, the Bank helped to supply 20% of the target population with drinking water, i.e. 438 200 of the estimated 2 130 000 inhabitants. Management is of the view that huge sanitation needs persist and that the situation for the two basic services remains poor in rural areas.
The evaluation shows that in 2012, access to drinking water in the urban and rural areas stood
at approximately 90% and 60%, respectively. In terms of sanitation, access to improved facilities was above 65% in urban areas and reached 40% in rural areas in the same year. Management deems the results obtained encouraging. Ongoing and future operations should consolidate these achievements and strengthen access to water and sanitation. Management acknowledges the need to strengthen the sector. It is true that physical achievements in the sector have not translated into higher levels of access to drinking water and improved sanitation commensurate with expectations.
The Bank will pursue its interventions in the water and sanitation sector, rural electrification, rural roads and lighting of towns, in its drive to improve the people’s living conditions. This will be done through such integrated Government programs as the Emergency Community Development Program (PUDC) and the Towns Modernization Program (PROMOVIL).
Management notes that the evaluation rated the social development effectiveness as moderately satisfactory. It also notes the positive impact of its operations on improvement of healthcare coverage and access resulting from training, health staff sensitization and health infrastructure construction activities. Regarding education, which is another key human resource development component, Management appreciated the achievements made in the Bank’s area of intervention, for instance the increase in the gross enrolment rate, especially that of girls. Furthermore, most of the classrooms (98%) and related facilities have been built. Management agrees with the difficulties that the school construction program encountered.
Efficiency
Ratings of the various sectors show satisfactory efficiency in transport infrastructure and governance, and moderately satisfactory performance in
9Management’s Response
An ID
EV C
ount
ry S
trat
egy
Eval
uatio
n
agriculture, rural development, water and sanitation. The efficiency was deemed moderately unsatisfactory in the energy sector and unsatisfactory in terms of social development.
Management shares the concerns highlighted by the evaluation, especially delays in executing projects in the energy sector and cost overruns in the construction of health infrastructure.
Management would like to share information on recent developments: the Rural Electrification Project was closed end-October 2015. Recovery of the part of the cancelled balance will help to finance new Bank operations in Senegal, especially PUDC. As regards the Sendou Coal Power Plant Project, it was restructured and the relevant funds disbursed in October 2015.
Management has made provision for a series of actions to speed up the implementation of its operations in Senegal. In this connection, project monitoring has been enhanced. Quarterly and annual portfolio review between the Bank, the Ministry of the Economy and Finance and the executing agencies are regularly organized to strengthen operations coordination and monitoring. Measures are also taken to guarantee the implementation of supervision mission recommendations.
The capacity of project staff is being built. To familiarize the staff of executing agencies and ministries with Bank rules and procedures (financial management, procurement and disbursement), individual supervision activities, in the form of coaching (on procurement and disbursement), were also conducted for project managers.
Concerning the timeframe for processing procurement files and disbursement requests, processing and approval of the relevant files is handled at SNFO in line with the Delegation of Authority matrix.
In terms of project financial management, the Bank has received all project audit reports for fiscal year 2013, which were due 30 June 2014.
However, to speed up the pace of project implementation, performance contracts were signed between the sector ministries and coordinators, on the one hand, and between the coordinator and other members of the project implementation team, on the other. Further efforts should be made to generalize the annual evaluation of these contracts.
Regarding project quality at entry, the average timeframe between approval and first disbursement dropped from 12.3 months in 2011 to approximately 6 months in 2015.
Still on the subject of project quality at entry, following the 2010-2015 CSP review in 2013, the preparation of approved projects gathered pace in earnest. These achievements will be strengthened within the framework of the next CSP. The Bank plans to finance a capacity building project to assist the Government in preparing projects and programs, and in monitoring/evaluation. Institutional support will concern other actors – local governments and non-state actors.
Sustainability
The evaluation has shown that the sustainability of achievements of the Bank’s intervention is moderately probable. Sustainability was deemed probable in agriculture, rural development and the energy sector. It was deemed moderately probable in the transport infrastructure sector, governance, drinking water and sanitation infrastructure. Lastly, sustainability was deemed improbable for social development. Management shares the evaluation’s view according to which,
10 Senegal: Evaluation of the Bank's Country Strategy and Program 2004–2013 Summary Report
even if the communities owned the achievements in a number of sectors, problems persist in terms of: (1) mobilization of the infrastructure maintenance budget; (2) poor operating conditions of the structures; and (3) training on the use of equipment. Effort should be made to strengthen the sustainability of outcomes in the next CSP.
Management is reassured by IDEV’s evaluation which notes that works financed by the Bank in infrastructure are overall well built, in line with the highest possible standards. It shares the concerns raised by the evaluation in connection with the poor operating conditions of the structures and the poor predictability of State budget contribution to road maintenance.
Regarding reforms (governance), the evaluation pointed out that the implementation of reforms by public departments guarantees their sustainability. It also highlighted the fact that public officers in charge of the reforms received training to build their technical capacity.
Management is satisfied with the results of the evaluation according to which project implementation units that are part and parcel of the administration constitute institutional frameworks for learning, disseminating and sustaining the results-based culture. This outcome is an additional guarantee of sustainability.
In future, Management will pursue the anchoring of projects within sector ministries and capacity building to strengthen the sustainability of its interventions. Furthermore, Management plans to support the mobilization of financial resources through public-private partnerships (PPP) to strengthen the sustainability of its interventions in Senegal.
Cross-Cutting Aspects
Gender. Management is encouraged by the outcomes of the evaluation according to which gender issues were mainstreamed in most operations. The progress noted includes the application of the law on parity, which allowed for the doubling of the percentage of women in the National Assembly in 2012 (43% compared to 22% before then). Progress has also been made in reforms related to the business climate and other support operations of the Bank.
Regional integration: Concerning regional integration, Management appreciates the evaluation outcomes according to which 3 transboundary corridors and works financed by the Bank helped to improve Senegal’s connectivity with its neighbours, notably The Gambia, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau and Mali. This has contributed to increasing the volume of trade between Senegal and these countries. In addition, the Bank also provided support to accompany the domestication of WAEMU directives in the national legislation.
Environment. Regarding environmental management, Management is pleased with the outcomes of the evaluation which indicate that environmental impact assessments were systematically conducted, including for private sector operations. However, Management acknowledges that the implementation of the Environmental and Social Management Plan is behind schedule in a number of operations, especially the Blaise Diagne International Airport and the Sendou Coal Power Plant. It will take the necessary measures to avoid such situations in the next CSP.
Bank’s Performance
Management appreciates the outcomes according to which “the establishment of the Dakar regional
11Management’s Response
An ID
EV C
ount
ry S
trat
egy
Eval
uatio
n
office as of 2005 intensified advisory and technical assistance services through more proactive direct contact and facilitated dialogue with the authorities and non-state actors, and helped the Government to adopt more effective practices.” These outcomes were obtained thanks to joint quarterly reviews, joint annual reviews, more regular supervision, bi-monthly fiduciary clinics and individual coaching of managers of project implementation units. There were also formal bi-monthly monitoring of implementation of the Portfolio Improvement Plan.
As concerns inclusive growth, Management is satisfied with the results obtained. Among others, we take note of the more than 1 200 km of rural roads built in 84 rural communities under the PPC/PNIR Project. This project created opportunities for income-generating activities for the marginalized rural dwellers and increased women and children’s access to education and healthcare. Moreover, special mechanisms were used to include disadvantaged groups in several projects.
In connection with transition to green growth, Management appreciates the conclusions of the evaluation according to which the Bank’s efforts contributed to supporting climate-adaptation and climate-change-mitigation efforts in the agricultural sector, increased water control and reduced the vulnerability of farmers to climate hazards and flooding.
Regarding knowledge management, Management welcomes the evaluation outcomes according to which the Bank conducted a large body of knowledge work (13 just between 2010 and 2015) which underpinned the preparation of its intervention strategies and guided its dialogue.
Country’s Performance
Management notes with satisfaction that Government’s efforts in the field of reforms and management of development outcomes enabled Senegal to obtain increased support and higher disbursements from TFPs. Official Development Assistance (ODA) rose from CFAF 479 billion in 2010 to CFAF 697 billion in 2012 (i.e. a 45% increase). Moreover, since 2012 the Government prepares annual reports on development cooperation, which includes the effective disbursements made by TFPs. In terms of consultation and accountability, the Government consults non-state actors once or twice yearly, especially stakeholders (public sector, private sector, civil society, broader public sector, TFPs) during presidential thematic discussions and annual cooperation reviews. Management acknowledges that weaknesses persist (delay in fulfilling conditions precedent to first disbursement, delay in submitting audit reports, delay and poor quality of works due to malfunction of procurement procedures, etc.). It would like to highlight the encouraging progress made by the Government in recent years. Thus, no delay was recorded in submitting audit reports due for 2015, compared to 33% delay in 2012. Also, there was a 50% reduction in the timeframe between approval and first disbursement, from 12.3 months to 6 months between 2012 and 2015. Furthermore, the timeframe for processing procurement files was reduced by 80%, from 15 days in 2011 to 3 days in 2015. Lastly, the portfolio contains no project at risk in 2015, compared to 10% in 2011.
12 Senegal: Evaluation of the Bank's Country Strategy and Program 2004–2013 Summary Report
Management has taken due note of lessons drawn from the evaluation conducted by IDEV. It agrees with most of the recommendations. The lessons and recommendations of this evaluation will be taken into consideration during formulation of the new Bank assistance strategy in Senegal (2016-2020) and all operations will be implemented within this framework.
Inventory of Measures Taken by Management
Recommendation Management’s response
Recommendation 1: Strengthen the Bank’s Strategic Positioning
Greater selectivity in areas of intervention based on adequate analytical work is recommended, to enable the Bank to maximize its development impacts.
Agreed: This recommendation will be taken into consideration in the CSP (2016-2020) being prepared.
Effort in terms of selectivity was made during the definition of the new CSP pillars. However, the CSP takes into consideration the 5 high institutional priorities (High Fives), the Bank’s Ten-Year Strategy and the Emerging Senegal Plan (PSE). Each of the 2 pillars retained has two focus areas:
❙ Pillar I entitled: “Support the structural transformation of the economy" focuses on the development of agricultural value chains and regional integration.
❙ Pillar II entitled “Improve the people’s living conditions” focuses on two areas: access to basic services; and job creation. The number of projects retained was considerably reduced, based on the longlist discussed with the Government. Preference will be given to large integrated and multisector operations.
Recommendation 2: Ensure Infrastructure Sustainability
Specifically for roads, a subject of dialogue with the Government concerns the establishment of a mechanism guaranteeing the timely contribution of the State budget to the Autonomous Road Maintenance Fund, to enable respect of the annual road maintenance program.
Agreed:This recommendation will be taken into account in the CSP (2016-2017) being prepared.
❙ Discussions on setting up a mechanism guaranteeing the timely contribution of the State to the Autonomous Road Maintenance Fund (FERA) will be a key dialogue issue in the next CSP. This is all the more recommended since Senegal has continuously improved its budget performance in the last decade.
❙ Moreover, as is being done under the PNDL, communities will be increasingly involved in infrastructure management
Recommendation 3: Increase the Effectiveness of Operations Supervision
Increase the effectiveness of operations supervision through three complementary actions: (i) help the Government to set up an effective results-based monitoring/evaluation mechanism that is also capable of supplying the Bank with reliable data on implementation performance and development outcomes; (ii) organize supervision in a way that covers all relevant aspects, including more rigorous monitoring of the implementation of environmental management plans and quality control, to avoid several defects observed on some structures ; and (iii) ensure the implementation of supervision mission recommendations.
Agreed:This recommendation will be taken into consideration in the CSP (2016-2020) being prepared.
Management acknowledges that the monitoring/evaluation of public policies remains a challenge in Senegal. To overcome the challenge, the Government issued Decree 2015-679 establishing the harmonized framework for public policy monitoring/evaluation.
❙ The Bank was part of the Monitoring/Evaluation Thematic Group that dialogues with the Senegalese authorities on ways of institutionalizing results-based management in the Emerging Senegal Plan.
❙ Measures to strengthen monitoring/evaluation in Bank operations will be consolidated both for budget support and projects. Specifically, these include efforts in supervision missions and strengthening the SNFO team with financial management, procurement and disbursement experts who systematically participate in supervision missions. Measures to guarantee the implementation of supervision mission recommendations are also planned.
Photo/Presidency of Republic of Senegal
Senegal has a population of 12.8 million inhabitants, 51% of whom are women. As a result of the construction of the Kedougou-Moussala road, which passes through Saraya, the local economy is developing and women have greater opportunities for income-generating activities.
14 Senegal: Evaluation of the Bank's Country Strategy and Program 2004–2013 Summary Report
Introduction
As a key component of the Comprehensive Evaluation of the African Development Bank’s Development Results (CEDR), this evaluation measures the relevance, effectiveness, sustainability and efficiency of Bank Group assistance to Senegal over the period, as well as the institutional performances of the Borrower and the Bank between 2004 and 2013. The Government, civil society and the other actors concerned hope to learn lessons that will be reflected in the design and smooth implementation of the Bank's 2016–2020 Country Strategy Paper (CSP) for Senegal.
After presenting the evaluation's objectives, this report first reviews the methodology, limitations, and the context of Senegal, as well as the main challenges and national development strategy.
Subsequently, the report describes the Bank's 2004–2013 assistance strategies for Senegal, presents the conclusions, and formulates recommendations for the various actors.
Evaluation Goal and Objectives
The evaluation was conducted in order to enhance the Bank's effectiveness and credibility. The evaluation objectives are to:
❙ assess the relevance, effectiveness and sustainability of the Bank's contribution to achieving the objectives defined in the 2004–2013 CSP, as well as the performances of the Borrower and Bank;
Country level
Pillar level
Project level
Means of action/Projects
National results
Intermediate outcome
Intermediate outcome
immediate outcome
immediate outcome
immediate outcome
Project 4Project 3Project 2Project 1
Figure1: Levels of Analysis (of Results)
Source: Authors
15Introduction
An ID
EV C
ount
ry S
trat
egy
Eval
uatio
n
❙ analyze the efficiency and/or impact, where data is available;
❙ draw lessons relating to the design and implementation of the Bank's operations; and
❙ formulate recommendations in order to improve the Bank's future strategies.
Methodological Approach2
The operations implemented by the Government with Bank resources are the means of achieving the development objectives agreed upon between the two parties in the CSP. This evaluation focuses on a description of the results achieved in the Bank's strategies and programs in Senegal between 2004 and 2013, and the factors that contributed to, or hampered their achievement. The aim is not to establish specific direct cause-and-effect links between these results and the Bank's intervention.
The evaluation covered thirty-two (32) operations approved between 2004 and 2013 and eight (08) operations approved after 2000 but completed or closed between 2009 and 2013 in six priority sectors on the basis of the level of financial commitments (Figure 3).
The methodological approach adopted three dimensions: national, sector and project. This combined approach provides more opportunities for analyzing and understanding the results. It overcomes the difficulties caused by the lack of factual data required for a comprehensive analysis. The exercise was guided by a series of questions (Annex 2) formulated to meet the expectations of CEDR and IDEV internal practices relating to the preparation of country strategy and program evaluations. On the basis of these questions grouped together by evaluation criterion, indicators were defined or drawn from the CSPs, project appraisal reports, and the
Results Measurement Framework (RMF) prepared by the Bank's Quality Assurance and Results Department (ORQR) to measure the results obtained at each level of analysis. The criteria are: relevance, effectiveness, efficiency and sustainability (Annex 2). In the special case of relevance, the evaluation took into account the selectivity of the Bank's choices and its strategic positioning. The evaluation was based on a scoring scale of 6 points per criterion3. For each sector, the performance rating corresponds to the average of all the project scores. The overall rating for the Bank's assistance strategies and programs over the period is the average of all the scores obtained in each sector.
For triangulation purposes, these indicators were updated with data gathered from several sources (country team, Government, local elected officers, civil society, private sector, project beneficiaries and development partners) and using different methods: documentary review, quick survey with questionnaire, semi-structured discussions, and direct observation. Within the limits of the available budget and timeframe, the sites visited and respondents were selected on the basis of geographical representativeness (country map in Annex 4), the project implementation status and their accessibility. Furthermore, two stakeholder consultative workshops were organized to take their expectations into account in the evaluation, ensure that the data collected reflect the actual situation, and encourage ownership of the results. The analysis is based on the theories of change of the different projects reconstituted from the data collected (Annex 3). Quality control was carried out by internal and external peer reviewers.
Limitations of the Evaluation
The main difficulties of the evaluation concerned availability of data on the outcomes of the Bank's strategies and programs. The team endeavoured to provide information on the evaluation criteria by triangulating data sources and collection methods.
16 Senegal: Evaluation of the Bank's Country Strategy and Program 2004–2013 Summary Report
Country Context Between 2004 and 2013
Between Dakar on the Cap-Vert Peninsula, Africa's most westerly point, and Mauritania to the North and East, Mali to the South-East, Guinea and Guinea-Bissau to the South, Senegal covers 196,722 km² administratively divided into 14 regions, 45 Departments, 117 arrondissements (administrative districts), 123 municipalities, 375 rural communities, and 14,400 villages. The Gambia forms an enclave within the country along the Gambia River. Senegal is a flat country with a hot tropical climate comprising a dry season from October to June, and a rainy season between July and September. The country has a population of 12.8 million inhabitants, 51% of whom are women. The population is very unevenly distributed. It is concentrated in the West and Centre. The East and North are sparsely populated. The average density rose from 55.8 to 71.8 inhabitants per km² between 2004 and 2013, and varies across the country: 400 inhabitants/km² in Dakar and 8 inhabitants/km² in Tambacounda. Urbanization is increasing with an urban population which now represents 43.1%, with the city of Dakar alone home to about 55%.
Senegal, which became independent in 1960, is one of Africa's most stable countries, despite insecurity in Casamance (south of the country) and the terrorist threat from neighbouring Mali. As regards the conflict in Casamance, a peace agreement was signed with the separatists in December 2004. An Amnesty Law was also promulgated, so also another law abolishing the death penalty. Despite this political stability, mention should be made of the high turnover of Ministers due to frequent cabinet reshuffle between 2000 and 2012. Since 2012, the country has been led by President Macky Sall who
came to office following a democratic change of political power.
Following the devaluation of the CFA franc in January 1994, growth revived in the Senegalese economy. Real GDP increased by 2.9% in 1994 and by an annual average of over 5% between 1995 and 2001. This trend continued until 2013, with the exception of a downturn observed in 2009 and 2010. These results were achieved against a backdrop of steadily narrowing public finance and balance of payment deficits and controlled inflation (PRSP 1, p. 2). The agriculture sector rebound, the expansion of electric power generation and chemical production capacities, as well as the buoyancy of the construction sector and recovery of public investment have been the main drivers of economic growth. However, the number of poor people has steadily risen since 2006, even though the proportion of people living below the poverty line had fallen to 46.7% in 2013. Poverty is more prevalent in rural areas than in urban centres. The AfDB statistics in Annex 8 show Senegal's socio-economic situation in comparison to the other countries.
Country's Main Development Challenges between 2004 and 2013
Senegal aims to become an emerging country by 2035. However, with an annual population growth of between 2.6% and 2.9%, the economic growth rates (between 4.9% and 1.7%) between 1995 and 2014 are below the target of 7% set to roll back poverty and achieve the Millennium Development Goals. The country faces a number of constraints4:
17Country Context Between 2004 and 2013
An ID
EV C
ount
ry S
trat
egy
Eval
uatio
n
high cost of labour; an institutional and regulatory framework which provides insufficient incentive (administrative red-tape, corruption); legal insecurity, especially in land ownership; lack of road, rail, port, energy, water and sanitation infrastructure; relatively little financing of local enterprises by the national banking system; economic growth over-focused on services; a structural current account deficit partly due to the fact that services are not easily exported, as well as imported inflation fueled by a combination of sluggish agricultural productivity and strong demand for food products. Oil price fluctuations and vulnerability of agricultural production related to the threat of locusts, irregular rainfall and floods are all exogenous factors which also affect Senegal's economy.
The Country's Development Strategy over the Period
In order to address the above-mentioned challenges, the Government has prepared successive programs presented in PRSP I (2003-2005), PRSP II (2006-2010), SNDES (2013-2017), and PSE (2014-2018).
Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (2003-2005 PRSP I): With a view to reducing poverty, the main objectives are divided into four focus areas: (i) double income per capita by 2015 against a backdrop of strong, balanced and more evenly distributed growth; (ii) achieve widespread access to essential social services by accelerating the establishment of basic infrastructure to build human capital by 2010; (iii) eradicate all forms of exclusion within the country and achieve gender equality, especially in
primary and secondary education, by 2015; and (iv) implement a participatory and decentralized process for program management, implementation and monitoring-evaluation.
Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (2006-2010PRSP II): The strategy seeks to: (i) reduce the incidence of poverty in the population to below 30% by 2015, (ii) achieve a growth rate of at least 7% over the period, (iii) increase access to basic social services and strengthen food security, (iv) reduce inequalities and eradicate all forms of exclusion, and (v) promote good governance and the rule of law.
National Economic and Social Development Strategy (SNDES 2013-2017): The strategy aims to improve economic growth rates, smooth the impact of exogenous shocks while preserving future options and building resilience, as well as placing Senegal on a sustainable development pathway through: (i) economic emergence, (ii) optimization of the energy policy, (iii) adaptation to climate change, (iv) food security, and (v) peace and security.
Emerging Senegal Plan (2014-2018 PSE): The strategic guidelines are as follows: (i) transform the economy's structure to enable it support strong and sustainable growth momentum; (ii) expand access to social services and social security, as well as maintain the conditions of sustainable development; and (iii) meet the requirements of good governance through institution building and the promotion of peace, security and African integration.
Photo/Debazou Yantio
Regarding water and sanitation, this evaluation concludes that “the Bank's strategies and programs meet the needs of the population for access to drinking water and sanitation so as to improve their living conditions and achieve the government's objectives of improving urban and rural drinking water and sanitation access rates.”
19Bank Assistance Strategies and Programs 2004 - 2013
An ID
EV C
ount
ry S
trat
egy
Eval
uatio
n
Bank Assistance Strategies and Programs 2004 - 2013
Most of the operations have been financed from ADF IX, ADF X, ADF XI, ADF XII and ADF XII resources. AfDB's private sector window resources have been mobilized, especially in the transport and energy sectors. The Trust Funds have also been used, particularly the African Water Facility (AWF) Special Fund, the Fund for African Private Sector Assistance (FAPA), the Special Relief Fund, the Global Environment Facility (GEF), the Accelerated Co-financing Facility for Africa (ACFA) and the Global Agriculture and Food Security Program (GAFSP).
Over the 2004-2013 period, the Government and the Bank negotiated and implemented three
successive CSPs: 2002-2004, 2005-2009 and 2010-2015. Over these respective periods, the theories of change on which the strategies are based are simplified in Figures 2, 3 and 4 and the detailed logical frameworks are presented in Annexes 5, 6 and 7.
With regard to the non-lending portfolio, six economic and sector work (ESW) studies were planned between 2010 and 2015.
Figures 5 and 6 below present the portfolio's configuration by funding window and sector of operations.
20 Senegal: Evaluation of the Bank's Country Strategy and Program 2004–2013 Summary Report
Poverty reduction
Expe
cted
Out
com
esOp
erat
ion
Sustainable growth focused on private initiative
PillarsReducing vulnerability of agriculture and rural
development
Health Project II
UA 11.35 million
Education Project IV
UA 14.84 million
Improving the quality of human resources
Consolidation of the macroeconomic
framework
Local Small-Scale irrigation Support
Project UA 14.31 million
The livestock sector
development study
UC 0.79 million
Rural Electrification
Project
UA 9.58 million
Project to support the Directorale of Forecasting and
Statistics and the PRSP Monitoring
Unit
UA 1.55 million
Private Sector Adjustment
Support Program
UA 24 million
Figure 2: Theory of Change, 2002-2004 Country Strategy Paper
21Bank Assistance Strategies and Programs 2004 - 2013
An ID
EV C
ount
ry S
trat
egy
Eval
uatio
n
Poverty reduction
Expe
cted
resu
ltsOp
erat
ion
Pillars
Sub-pillars
Improving access to socioeconomic infrastructure
Promoting good
governance
Capacity building
Enhancing the private
sector’s contribution to the GDP
Dakar-Diamniadio
highway
UA 45 million
Sendou coal-fired
power plant UA 48.59 million
Figure 3: Theory of Change, 2005-2009 Country Strategy Paper
Accelerated growth
2. Improving access to basic insfrastrure 1. Enhancing the business environment
Road maintenance project
UA 27.19 million
Rural drinking water supply and sanitation
UA 24.92 million
Kounoune thermal power plant project
6.40 million UC
Kita-Kati-Saraya-Kedougou multinational project (Dakar-Bamako)
UA 14.44 million
Multinational bridge construction in Rosso (Senegal-Mauritania)
Labé-Sériba-Tambacounda road project
UA 20.50 million
Ziguinchor sanitation master plan
UA 0.826 million
Implementation of the integrated water resources management Plan of action
(PAGIRE) in Senegal UA 1.396 million
Second rural water supply and sanitation sub-programme
UA 30 million
Dakar container terminal
UA 17.67 million
Project for the Modernization of the Cadastre
(PAMOCA)
UA 2.19 million
Private sector adjustment
support programme (PAASP II)
Poverty reduction strategy
support project
UA 30 million
Casamance reconstruction
integrated project
UA 20 million
Rumi-Sene sustainable
livestock management
project
UA 4.44 million
22 Senegal: Evaluation of the Bank's Country Strategy and Program 2004–2013 Summary Report
Pillars
Sub-Pillars
Contribution to strengthening national and regional infrastructure
Oper
atio
ns
Continued support to basic infrastructure
Collection and management of
Ziguinchor sewage sludge
0.11 UA million
Support to small-scale irrigation (additional
loan) project8.40 UA million
Support to inclusive growth
program (PACICE)25.54 UA million
VOLO Africa Trust
Information & Credit Bureau pilot program
0.18 UA million
Dakar Toll highway8.36 UA million Support to
economic reforms program (PARE)
27 UA million
Support the promotion of private
sector project (PAPSP)4.04 UA million
Blaise Diagne International Airport
61,85 UA million
Community feeder road programm (PPC/
PNDL II)15 UA million
Food security support project : Louga Matam
Kaffrine (PASA)28.03 UA million
Gambia Bridge3.180 UA million
Private sector loan1.24 UA million
Restoration of ecological functions
of Lake Guiers project (PREFELAG)
0.11 UA million
Intensify the development of economic infrastructure Support good
economic gov-ernance and the quality of public
services
Improve the investment climate and
enhance com-petitiveness
Support econom-ic diversification
and finance investment op-
portunities in the private sector
Business climate improvement and support framework for economic diversification
Support the promotion of youth
employment and women
project21.19 UA million
Figure 4: Theory of Change, 2010-2015 Country Strategy Paper
23Bank Assistance Strategies and Programs 2004 - 2013
An ID
EV C
ount
ry S
trat
egy
Eval
uatio
n
Figure 5: Project Distribution by Funding Window (commitments in UA)
AfDB27,42%
ADF60,88%
FAPA0,04%
Mixed11,09%
AWF0,44%
Special emergencyfund
0,12%
Source: AfDB Statistics, 2014
Figure 6: Project Distribution by Sector (commitments in UA)
Social4%
Energy12%
Transport38%
Water and Sanitation11%
Multisector20%
Agriculture0,44%
Source: AfDB Statistics, 2014
Photo/CERD
The Bank has supported climate change mitigation and adaptation measures in the agriculture sector. The same has been done in irrigation schemes which have improved water management and reduced the vulnerability of farmers to climatic hazards and floods.
25Evaluation Results of Bank Strategies and Programs
An ID
EV C
ount
ry S
trat
egy
Eval
uatio
n
Evaluation Results of Bank Strategies and Programs
The results are presented in terms of evaluation criterion. For each criterion, the Bank's performances are reviewed in descending order of financial commitments (Figure 6).
Relevance, Selectivity and Strategic Positioning
The alignment was evaluated on the basis of, and analysis of the planning documents for the 2004-2013 period (PRSP 1, PRSP II and the SNDES), the CSPs (2002-2004, 2005-2009 and 2010-2015), and discussions with the actors.
In general, private sector development for accelerated growth and the establishment of infrastructure to provide access to the various basic economic and social services so as to reduce poverty remained at the core of the Senegalese Authorities' priorities between 2004 and 2013. The document analysis and discussions with the actors show that the design of the Bank's strategies and programs is guided by these priorities defined through a participatory process involving all development actors. Indeed, the sector Ministries propose policy letters which are consolidated at Prime Minister level, validated at the Presidency of the Republic, and then submitted to the Bank to enrich consultations involving non-State actors and the private sector.
Transport: Road transport is the main transport mode in Senegal. Over 95% of the transportation of people and 90% of freight transport is by road5. Roads to Dakar Port are saturated and communications with the country's interior and neighbouring countries are handicapped by obsolete road infrastructure which is little developed and in poor condition. In rural areas, the transport-related deficits affect the level of access to basic social services. Transport represented 5.3% and 6.3% of household budgets
Relevance is fairly satisfactory. All the Bank's strategies and programs are aligned with the priorities of the Government's development policies, the beneficiaries' requirements and the Bank's operational priorities. However, the Bank lacks selectivity, and its strategic positioning is not underpinned by a specific analysis.
Table 1: Performance Rating
Relevance-related aspects RatingAlignment with national and sector strategies Highly satisfactory
Selectivity Unsatisfactory
Strategic positioning Moderately Satisfactory
Overall Relevance Rating Moderately Satisfactory
26 Senegal: Evaluation of the Bank's Country Strategy and Program 2004–2013 Summary Report
in Dakar in 2005 and 20116 respectively. Between 2004 and 2013, the Bank's strategies and programs corresponded to the Government's policy (PRSP I, PRSP II and SNDES) which aims to improve the country's competitiveness, foster wealth creation by the private sector, and expand the population's access to basic social services. These strategies address the need for increased mobility of people and goods in previously remote rural communities, urban households and businesses in Dakar.7
Governance: The Bank's strategies and programs have focused on robust administrative and regulatory reforms of economic, financial and fiscal governance in the various public administrations. These reforms are: improvement of budget comprehensiveness and transparency through the enactment of the Organic Law on Finance laws; implementation of WAEMU budget classification standards; building of tax resource mobilization capacities, auditing of the civil service payroll, and establishment of the various good governance structures (Box 2). They are compliant with the Government's objective of accelerating wealth creation, and address the needs of public administrations in terms of the required economic and social information for decision-making.
Agriculture and Rural Development: The Bank's operations have aimed to reduce the impact of climate change, and build the resilience of rural communities. They mainly concern the intensification of production systems and improvement of productivity; irrigation schemes and structures, rural roads; smallholder structuring and professionalization, and agricultural extension (Annexes 2 and 3). They are closely aligned with national priorities (PRSP I and II, and SNDES). An analysis of the planning documents confirmed by discussions with those concerned has shown that these projects meet the beneficiaries' needs which are: (i) access to rural economic infrastructure; (ii) stronger technical capacities; and (iii) mitigation of the impacts of drought and sustainable resource management.
Energy: The electricity sector is marked by obsolete facilities, lack of investment, high cost prices, lack of access to electricity, and long and frequent power outages. The Bank's strategies and programs concern: rehabilitation and reinforcement of electric power generation, transmission and distribution facilities; increased hydro-power generation and supply; reduction in technical and non-technical losses; and construction of grid interconnections with neighbouring countries. They address the population's need for access to more affordable electricity and the challenges facing the government to create an enabling environment for development of the private sector, source of economic growth and poverty reduction in rural and urban areas8.
Water and Sanitation: The Bank's strategies and programs concern both urban and rural water supply and sanitation. The Bank's strategies and programs meet the needs of the population for access to drinking water and sanitation so as to improve their living conditions and achieve the government's objectives of improving urban and rural drinking water and sanitation access rates.
Social Development: The Bank's strategies and programs are focused on improving the quality of human resources through education and health. The strategies and programs are compliant with the Government's overarching objective of expanding access to essential social services by establishing basic infrastructure so as to strengthen human capital. The operations meet the needs of the population which are to: (i) improve the quality of education and health care, (ii) provide more infrastructure throughout the country, and (iii) reduce inter-regional and gender inequalities.
Alignment with Operational Priorities: A comparative analysis of the Bank's strategic framework documents for 2003-2007, 2008-2012 and 2013-2022, and the CSPs (2002-2004, 2005-2009 and 2010-2015) shows that
27Evaluation Results of Bank Strategies and Programs
An ID
EV C
ount
ry S
trat
egy
Eval
uatio
n
the latter reflect the Bank's operational priorities: governance and private sector development (public sector reforms), infrastructure, education, health, water and sanitation, energy, agriculture and rural development, gender, regional integration, inclusive growth and transition to green growth.
Complementarity between Bank operations: The document analysis shows that the operations were generally formulated to contribute to the achievement of the strategic objectives defined in the CSPs (see Figures 2, 3 and 4). There is also strong synergy between private and public sector operations. Indeed, the PPPs are accompanied by institutional reforms aimed at improving the business environment. The choice of the education and health inter-sectoral approach and the search for synergies with existing initiatives have helped to increase sustainability of the social development outputs. The Rural Roads Project (PPR) in the agriculture and rural development sector complements the National Local Development Project (PNDL) which concerns governance. Indeed, by linking agricultural production areas with markets, rural roads contribute to the development of local economies.
Selectivity: The evaluation did not reveal any selectivity by the Bank in the choice of operations. On the other hand, the persons contacted appreciated the Bank’s flexibility, particularly in the fact that the strategic priorities of the new President elected in
2012 were taken into account during the 2010-2015 cycle.
Strategic Positioning: The Bank identified Senegal's development partners and their intervention areas in the 2005-2009 CSP. However, the review of the CSPs, confirmed by discussions with the country team and MEFP task managers did not reveal any specific Bank response to the developing landscape of Senegal's partners.
Effectiveness
Transport: The new container terminal completed in March 2002 boosted the productivity of Dakar Port. Indeed, according to the 2010-2013 statistics of DP World Dakar, the volume of container traffic rose from 273,000 twenty-foot equivalent units (TEU) in 2008 to 417,800 in 2014, i.e. 85% of the targeted objective. Ship waiting times at the terminal have been reduced from 15 to less than 2 hours; container delivery waiting times have fallen from 100
Effectiveness is fairly satisfactory. The sector performances are variable9. Most of the physical outputs have been achieved. However, these outputs have not always been translated into development outcomes.
Table 2: Effectiveness Rating
Sector RatingTransport Satisfactory
Governance Moderately Satisfactory
Agriculture and Rural Development Moderately Satisfactory
Energy Unsatisfactory
Water and Sanitation Unsatisfactory
Social Development Moderately Satisfactory
Overall Rating Moderately Satisfactory
28 Senegal: Evaluation of the Bank's Country Strategy and Program 2004–2013 Summary Report
to 23 minutes; the turnaround time for a container ship tug at the terminal estimated at 130 minutes in 2008 had dropped by 79% in 2013. The 6% increase in tariffs has been more than offset by the time-savings from which loaders now benefit.
The commissioning in August 2013 of the Dakar-Diamniadio motorway has decongested the Cap-Vert Peninsula, which covers 0.28% of the national territory and is home to 25% of the country's population, 95% of formal sector enterprises, 80% of non-agricultural informal sector production units, and 87% of full-time jobs10. It serves the new Diamniadio development hub established by the Government to attract private enterprises. Travel time was reduced from 90 to 30 minutes between 2008 and 2014. However, its financial rate of return is insufficient because of a shortfall of about 50% in heavy duty vehicle traffic11.
Dakar's connectivity with the interior of the country and neighbouring countries has been improved by corridors and roads that have been constructed or rehabilitated. 345 km of paved roads and 464 km of earth roads have been improved, including related structures (8 boreholes, 2 health huts, 2 markets, 7 school enclosures and 2 parking areas for heavy duty vehicles). On the rehabilitated paved roads, the average speed has increased from 20 km/h before the works to 80 for light vehicles, and from 15 to 70 km per hour for heavy duty vehicles12. The
corresponding reduction in travel time per 10 km is 22.5 mins for light vehicles and 31.4 mins for trucks. On the rehabilitated earth roads, the speed has increased from 15 to 60 km/h for light vehicles and 10 to 50 km/h for trucks, with respective time savings of 30 and 48 mn. Vehicle operating costs have fallen from 17% to 9% (degraded paved roads) and from 56% to 40% (degraded earth roads) as a result of the construction of new roads. In addition, the persons contacted reported greater access to basic socio-economic services (Box 1).
Governance: In public management and business environment, the Bank has contributed to the establishment of institutions and structures (Box 2) aimed at: (i) enhancing the efficiency of public administrations providing services to private enterprises, (ii) developing results-based public management, and (iii) improving private sector participation in the national economy.
With regard to public administration efficiency, the cadastral services have been equipped with adequate technical materials; user servicing times have been reduced, the duration of preliminary designs of major works have been shortened because of availability of maps provided by PAMOCA. The cost and time required to start a business fell sharply between 2004 and 2013, by 43% and 90% respectively13. However, land tax yields are inadequate because the tax services do not yet use the cadastral survey data
Transfer to Saraya was considered by civil servants as a disciplinary assignment because of the locality's inaccessibility. In order for their salaries to be paid in Kedougou (former Prefecture headquarters), it was necessary to wait 2 to 3 days for a public transport vehicle for a 3 hour journey. As a result of the construction of the Kedougou-Moussala road, which passes through Saraya, transfer to Saraya is no longer considered as a punishment for it now takes only 30 mn to reach Kedougou. The journey to Moussala (51 km from Mali) takes 38 mn instead of one day. As a result, the local economy is developing: women have greater opportunities for income-generating activities from the new traveler and trucker clientele passing through, and one micro-credit agency has opened and others are expected to follow.
Source: Survey Data, April 2014
Box 1: Sarya Locality is no longer isolated
29Evaluation Results of Bank Strategies and Programs
An ID
EV C
ount
ry S
trat
egy
Eval
uatio
n
of 60,000 plots in Dakar nor the mapping resources relating to the country's 76 localities. Indeed, MEFP structures are generally compartmentalized and do not collaborate easily, resulting in conflicts of competence.
As regards results-based public management, Bank support has helped to build institutional capacities for monitoring economic and social policies and the production of data on the socio-economic situation. However, the monitoring-evaluation system is fragmented, and evaluation activities are still disparate.
Overall, the country improved its performance between 2004 and 201314. Indeed, Senegal is now ranked 3rd in West Africa and 9th for the entire continent by the 2014 Mo Ibrahim Index, which assesses the quality of governance for each African country. According to Bank statistics, private sector activity has been very buoyant as reflected in the exponential increase of 191% in the volume of credit granted to private enterprises by the country's banks between 2004 and 2013. The percentage of public contracts awarded to SMEs rose from 20% in 2008 to 30% in 2014. Foreign direct investment rose from under US$ 64 million to over US$ 271 million between 2004 and 2012, representing a 325% increase. Over the same period,
tax revenue increased by 70%. Though great strides have been made, as mentioned above, Senegal's score in the “Doing Business” ranking (48.57 for a ranking in 153rd position out of 189 countries) remains below the average for South-Saharan Africa (49.66, average ranking 143)15 suggesting that there is room for deepening and consolidating reforms.
Agriculture and Rural Development: In the PAPIL areas concerned, sown areas have increased by 73% and production by 86%, which has helped to cover local needs for between 5 and 8, or 3 months in some places. Market garden production has also increased steadily, and currently stands at about 3,558 tonnes16. Under the PADERCA, about 14,100 ha of land were developed compared to initial estimates of 13,500 ha. This resulted in the production of 41,163 tonnes of cereals in 2014 and 3,525 tonnes of vegetables up to 2014 in the market garden plots. Under the PROGEBE, dairy production in 2014 increased by 269,000 litres compared to estimates of 136,400 litres in 2011. As a result of artificial insemination and sensitization under PAPEL II, 2 522 intensified mixed farms (IMF) for cattle and 1,113 IMF for sheep (3,023 fattened sheep and 3,008 breeding sheep) were established. Stockbreeders considered this project a blessing after the winding up of SODESP.
❙ Organic Law on Finance Laws (LOLF)
❙ Ensuring compliance of the governance system with several WAEMU standards
❙ Economic Policy Coordination and Monitoring Unit
❙ Operational Monitoring Bureau (BOS) of the Senegal Emerging Plan
❙ Organization and Methods Office (BOM)
❙ National Statistics and Demographic Agency (ANSD)
❙ Department of Forecasts and Economic Studies (DPEE)
❙ Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Development and Supervision Agency (ADEPME)
❙ Public procurement funds to provide guarantees to SMEs.
Source: Survey Data, March 2014
Box 2: Some institutions and structures established as part of the good governance reforms
30 Senegal: Evaluation of the Bank's Country Strategy and Program 2004–2013 Summary Report
Despite the delays, about 200 structures and other infrastructure have been completed under the PAPIL17 in Fatick, Kedougou, Kolda, Kaolack, and Tambacounda. These facilities have helped to recover 3,263 ha of salty land, restore 1,159 hectares of land, reforest 1,083 hectares of land, regenerate 90.75 ha of mangrove swamps, and protect 4 out of 5 island sites, with respective implementation rates of 109%, 208%, 169%, 363%, and 80%. In the Anambé basin, 3279 ha were sown in 2009 compared to initial estimates of 4,180 ha, with an intensification rate of 78%. A general reduction in yields of between 5 to 25% was recorded in the northern limits of the groundnut basin in Kaolack region18. According to the beneficiaries, implementation of the PADERBA has been a failure due to conflicts with the SODAGRI Directorate-General and the successive resignation of six project coordinators. Under the PPC/PNIR, over 1,200 kilometres of rural roads were constructed in 84 rural communities, resulting in an improvement of the living conditions of over 1,500,000 beneficiaries.
Energy: The rural electrification project has slowly connected to the national grid 118 out of the 275 targeted villages in the intervention area19, i.e. 43% implementation rate, which is far below the sector objective of 60% by 2016. With a two-year delay, the 125 MW coal-fired power plant in Sendou is 95% complete. Although the operation of the Kounoune diesel-fired thermal plant has helped to reduce supply shortage by generating 395.3 GWh of electric power in the interconnected grid in 2013, the duration and frequency of power outages have increased. Indeed, the cumulative annual duration of outages rose from 588 in 2010 to 915 in 2011. Similarly, their frequency rose from 350 in 2012 to 369 in 201320. In 2011, the estimated economic cost of outages was 1.4% of GDP21. In 2009, the average price of electricity in Senegal was CFAF 115/kWh. It was CFAF 117.96/kWh, CFAF 117.80/kWh, and CFAF 114/kWh in 2011, 2012 and 2013
respectively. The unit cost also gradually fell from CFAF 96.43/KWh in 2012 to CFAF 86.24/kWh in 2013, then to CFAF 83.24 /KWh in 2014.
Water and Sanitation: The objectives set for 201522 were to achieve drinking water access rates of 100% and 82% in urban and rural areas; and 78% and 20% for sanitation in urban and rural areas respectively. In urban areas, the sanitation access rate stands at 35.6% and the drinking water access rate at 81.2%. (PSEA, February 2014). The physical outputs are not reflected in levels of access to drinking water and sanitation to meet these expectations (Figure 7). The Bank has helped to provide 20% of the target population with drinking water, i.e. 438,200 inhabitants out of the estimated 2,130,000 between 2005 and 2015. Figure 7 also shows that: (i) sanitation requirements remain enormous, and (ii) in rural areas, the situation is poor for both basic services.
Social Development: The regional health system is now coherently organized with improved performance, particularly health care coverage and access, the quality of care, reduced morbidity and mortality rates due to reproductive health problems, childhood diseases, and STI/HIV/AIDS. About 732,000 of the 1,220,000 targeted women have been sensitized on priority health themes (HIV/AIDS, malaria, maternal and child health, establishment and management of health insurance companies); health personnel have been trained: 4 doctors, including one woman specialized in gynecology, 60 midwives trained in ultrasound, 3 civil and biomedical engineers including 1 woman, 12 teams trained in emergency obstetric care including 6 women (2 doctors and 4 nurses), 150 health workers in instrumentation, biology, anesthesia-intensive care and reproductive health: 950,000 community health care providers trained, 55% of whom were women, 83 neighbourhood mothers' and godmothers' committees established and
31Evaluation Results of Bank Strategies and Programs
An ID
EV C
ount
ry S
trat
egy
Eval
uatio
n
31 health action plans implemented, 65% of which will benefit women. All the planned infrastructure has been completed: 14 health posts, 2 referral health centres, 1 regional hospital, 1 regional blood transfusion centre, 1 voluntary and anonymous HIV/AIDS screening centre, 1 regional training centre, 1 regional pharmacy and regional administrative services constructed and equipped.
A similar situation exists in education where progress has been made: pupils' performances have improved and the gross enrolment ratio, especially for girls in the project area, have increased. In primary education, the results concerning access, quality and financing have exceeded expectations, as indicated in the Table below. The project has completed 98% of the construction work on classrooms and related equipment (semi-modern latrines, water points, teaching aids, and libraries), training sessions for education personnel (teachers, inspectors, IA and IDEN managers, heads of establishments, school heads) and sensitization for higher girls’ enrolment.
However, there have been implementation difficulties, especially the repeated replacement of the Education Project IV Coordinator, deficiencies of the procurement procedure, and weakness of works contractors; incomplete structures or structures completed with major defects; a two-year delay, additional costs, equipment not adapted to the physically impaired, and inappropriate construction sites (flood-prone land). These problems have affected quality and led to the suspension of disbursements. Implementation of the recommendations of supervision missions, often repeated from one mission to another, would have prevented these anomalies.
Efficiency
Transport: While average costs vary from country to country and from one structure to another, the costs of roads financed are far below the costs observed in other countries. In the case of the Dakar-Diamniadio motorway, the average cost is €13.6 million/km,
Figure 7: Access to Drinking Water and Sanitation in Senegal, 2004-2012
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Total population with access to drinking water sources (%)
Population with access to drinking water sources (%) in rural areas
Population with access to drinking water sources (%) in urban areasTotal population with access to improved sanitation (%)Total population with access to improved sanitation (%) in rural areasTotal population with access to improved sanitation (%) in urban areas
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Source: African Development Bank Statistics, 2014
32 Senegal: Evaluation of the Bank's Country Strategy and Program 2004–2013 Summary Report
exclusive of taxes and costs of compensation and clearing the right-of-way. This cost is €5 million in
Denmark and €19.2 million in the United Kingdom23. For the country's rehabilitated paved roads, the average cost per km is US$ 148,483 which compares with USD 299,55124 observed throughout Sub-Saharan Africa, corresponding to savings of 50%. Overall, there have been no works delays and no mobilization of supplementary resources except for the Tambacounda to Medina-Gounass road, which is seven months behind schedule.
Table 3: Health Sector Outcome Indicators
Outcome Indicators Baseline Value (2005 DHS)
2011
Percentage of deliveries performed in a health facility
Fatick 49% 65.4%
Tambacounda 34.7 45.1%
Kaolack 44.8 65.7%
Matam 47.1 54.1%
Immunization coverage of 12 to 23 months old children
Fatick 62.2 70.2%
Tambacounda 54.7 47.1%
Kaolack 56.2 65.7%
Matam 40.7 52.8
Reduction in morbidity and morbidity due to malaria and other major diseases*
Fatick 33.8 87.6%
Tambacounda 58.9 89.25%
Kaolack 33.7 80%
Matam 72.2 92.2%*Indicator adopted (proxy): Availability of at least one mosquito net per household
Source: Health Project II Completion Report PCR), 2013
Table 4: Status of Elementary Education
Components Indicators Baseline(2000)
Situation2011
2013
Access Gross enrolment rate for introductory courses 85.1% 110.3% 108.9%
Gross enrolment rate 67.2% 95.9% 95.3%
Gender Parity Index for the Gross Enrolment Ratio (GER)
96.4% 102.7% 112%
Pupils/teacher ratio in public primary education 48.5% 40 % ..
Quality Overall primary education completion rate 38.6% 70.4% 65.9%
Primary education repeater rate 12.4% 6.8% 2.8%
Drop-out rate 10.3% (in 2004) 6.3% 9.8%
Governance Share of elementary education in current spending on education
44.6% (in 2007) 47.1% 43.94%
Source: National reports on the status of education from 2000 to 2011 and SimulPDEF Phase 3.
Efficiency is fairly unsatisfactory mainly as a result of slippage on implementation and cost overruns or underruns.
33Evaluation Results of Bank Strategies and Programs
An ID
EV C
ount
ry S
trat
egy
Eval
uatio
n
Governance: The average project management cost, in relation to the total cost, is below the reference standards, especially those of the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) and the World Bank (WB (IFAD, 201425). The average unit cost of outputs produced in the different projects analyzed is UA 1,019,273. The comparative average cost of outputs is lower for the PADPS Project than for the PAMOCA Project. The average project management cost is UA 354,226 representing 10.61% of the total average cost of projects. Only the PAPSP has a proportion of management costs in relation to the total cost above the IFAD standard (13%). Figure 8 below presents the average management cost of the portfolio projects.
The operations have not been much affected by delays. The opening of the Regional Office in Dakar has helped to enhance efficiency by shortening the time taken to process documents and issue no objection opinions (NOO) from the Bank and improving the responsiveness of DCEF and the actors concerned in the Senegalese public administration. Furthermore, mobilization of the government counterpart funds has been regular and satisfactory for PIUs anchored in the MEFP. On the other hand, the counterpart funds for the PPC, whose PIU is anchored in the Ministry responsible for Local Development, was disbursed behind schedule in 2014 and 2015.
Agriculture and Local Development: Implementation of the operations was facilitated by anchoring the PIUs in the structures of the oversight Ministries and involving the employees of their decentralized services. The projects also have procedures manuals which clearly define the budget procedures, management of purchases and fixed assets, cash flow and personnel management, and the roles and responsibilities of the various stakeholders. However, some delays have been observed. Overall, a 6-to-18 month delay has been noted between signature and effectiveness of operations in the sector, mainly due to problems relating to non-fulfilment of conditions precedent (recruitment of the implementation team and submission of the environmental management plan). Implementation was also affected by other types of delays, especially in the award of contracts for studies, which adversely affected the implementation of certain works and the suspension of disbursements for ineligible expenditures revealed in the audit reports. Unrealistic planning of the implementation of the participatory process lengthened the implementation periods. With regard to costs, the anchoring of the Community Roads Project (PPC) in the implementation structure for the National Rural Infrastructure Program (PNIR) made it possible to pool operating costs. Only additional costs were covered: individual consultant responsible for assisting the PNIR Coordinator in implementing the
Table 5: Efficiency Rating
Sector RatingTransport Satisfactory
Governance Satisfactory
Agriculture and Rural Development Moderately Satisfactory
Energy Moderately Satisfactory
Water and Sanitation Moderately Satisfactory
Social Development Unsatisfactory
Overall Rating Moderately Satisfactory
34 Senegal: Evaluation of the Bank's Country Strategy and Program 2004–2013 Summary Report
additional tasks relating to the projects, sharing of the accounting system and administrative capacities for the supervision of activities in the field. Indeed, coordination costs represented 1.4% of the total project cost compared to 7.2% for the Louga, Matam and Kaffrine Food Security Project (PASA) and 24.5% for Invasive aquatic weed control project.
Energy: The delay in commissioning the Sendou coal-fired power plant resulted in estimated additional costs of CFAF 50 billion between 2011 and 2013, i.e. almost 60% of the 2011-2013 tariff compensation and 60% of the investment cost26. The average price and unit cost fell gradually between 2009 and 2014. Between 2010 and 2011, the annual duration of outages increased by 55.6%; between 2012 and 2013, the frequency of outages and electricity capacity increased by 5.4% and 652.9% respectively. Power outages have seriously affected the population's living and working conditions, as well as growth, and their economic cost was estimated by the Authorities at about 1.4% of GDP in 201127.
Water and Sanitation: According to the Department of Water Management, the cost of supplying one person with drinking water was about CFAF 35,675 for the PEPAM I project compared to CFAF 30 000 to 40 000 for projects financed by Luxemburg and the World Bank. Despite PAGIRE's geographical expansion, the project objectives were achieved at a lower than estimated cost because of savings made on studies and the procurement of transport equipment. On the other hand, the Dakar Sanitation Project (PAVD) has an unsatisfactory rate of return due to insufficient physical outputs and inefficient treatment and upgrading procedures. Indeed, out of two new units each with a treatment capacity of 10,000 m3/day of wastewater (i.e. a total of 20,000 m3/day), the project only constructed one incomplete unit (without a sludge treatment process) with a treatment capacity of 11,300 m3/day. For a
few years, the structures have been affected by an increased flow rate, sand silting of the sand blasters, unstable pre-treatment because of extremely advanced wear and tear, flooding of the sludge digestion system, and recurrent breakdowns of the hydraulic and electronic equipment procured28. The PAVD implementation unit was finally established in May 2004, over two years (28 months) behind schedule, because of administrative delays. With regard to the PAGIRE, the effectiveness of the new procurement procedure and the long document processing period delayed start-up of activities and delivery of outputs.
Social Development: The evaluation shows that unit costs were generally under-estimated. This resulted in financing gaps and revisions of lists of goods and services. In 2007, The Bank suspended disbursements for the Health Project II because of delays in the fulfilment of conditions precedent to the first disbursement and in implementing the final technical and geotechnical designs of the sites29.
Sustainability
Transport: Sustainability depends on three key factors: quality of the structure, operating conditions, and maintenance. Overall, direct observation indicates that the structures are well constructed. However, because of poor operating conditions, early degradation has been noted
Sustainability is fairly probable. The communities have assumed ownership of the assets in certain sectors. However, there are still problems regarding mobilization of the infrastructure maintenance budget, as well as poor operating conditions of the structures and training on the use of equipment.
35Evaluation Results of Bank Strategies and Programs
An ID
EV C
ount
ry S
trat
egy
Eval
uatio
n
between Kedougou and Moussala on the Dakar-Bamako corridor, as well as pavement deformation on the Dakar-Diamniadio road and cracks on the Rufisque BPV parking area. Despite sensitization of owners and drivers of heavy duty vehicles, axle overloading is frequent on roads throughout the country. Its annual cost is estimated at CFAF 35 billion30, which exceeded the CFAF 34 billion road maintenance budget in 2014. The smooth implementation of the annual road maintenance program could help to resolve these problems, but its completion is uncertain as it depends on the contribution of the State Budget (7 billion in 2014) to the resources of the Autonomous Road Maintenance Fund (FERA). This contribution cannot be mobilized within the appropriate time frame because of the single Treasury account principle and the length of the invoice payment procedure. The FERA budget execution rate is low (67% in 2014). However, the contractual obligation of road concessionaires to restore the infrastructure to good condition upon expiry of the concession could safeguard the road assets operated under concession, which does not concern the other categories of transport infrastructure.
Governance: The reforms presented above are implemented by Senegalese professionals of the established and/or restructured public administration, which is a guarantee for sustainability given the experience they acquire. In this respect, PIUs in the
administration constitute frameworks for institutional learning, as well as dissemination and sustainability of the results-based management culture. The staff involved have received specific training in order to build their skills and ensure continuation of reforms. The sustainability of institutional reforms is not guaranteed particularly for PIUs not anchored in the MEFP because of difficulties in mobilizing counterpart funds. Furthermore, lack of coordination between the established structures (see Box 2) also undermines the sustainability of the reforms.
Agriculture and Rural Development: Continuing maintenance of the established infrastructure is a core concern in agriculture sector project design. Indeed, irrigation infrastructure projects have established mechanisms to recover maintenance and replacement costs. The target groups have been provided with specific training to ensure a smooth handover, through a high degree of community participation in project design and implementation. In addition, since their start-up, projects have also relied on decentralized government services (CRZ, IREF, SODEFITEX, etc.), the operational capacities of which have been enhanced to encourage ownership and sustainability of the assets. Moreover, the option of entrusting project implementation to structures of the oversight Ministry has helped to improve interface in the processing of documents and communication, and this is likely to improve the viability of activities. However, community-based organizations experience
Table 6: Sustainability Rating
Sector RatingTransport Fairly probable
Governance Fairly probable
Agriculture and Rural Development Probable
Energy Probable
Water and Sanitation Fairly probable
Social Development Improbable
Overall Rating Fairly probable
36 Senegal: Evaluation of the Bank's Country Strategy and Program 2004–2013 Summary Report
difficulty in fulfilling the conditions for participation in the Bank's procurement procedures.
Energy: The roles and responsibilities of each operator in the sector were clarified under the new regulatory framework outlined in Law No. 98-29 of 14 April 1998, as amended by Law No. 2002-01 of 10 January 2002: Government of Senegal; Electricity Sector Regulatory Commission (CRSE); Rural Electrification Agency of Senegal (ASER); National Electricity Company of Senegal (SENELEC); various concessionaires and independent power producers. The participation of private investors will bolster the actions of public and/or parastatal entities. Consultation among the different parties provides another guarantee of sustainability. The gradual reduction of the Government compensation tariff (CFAF 76 billion projected for 2014 compared to CFAF 120 billion in 2012 and CFAF 88 billion in 201331), but with little impact on tariffs because
of cost reductions due to operating improvements could help to restore the sector's financial balance and contribute to the medium-to-long-term viability of operators. Furthermore, the security of power supply remains a problem because the country is 80% dependent on costly diesel-fired thermal plants32.
Water and Sanitation: Project implementation in the sector is supervised by the decentralized public services in rural areas which have insufficient staffing or budgets, hence the community anchoring noted. Information, education and communication (IEC) campaigns and technical support for the ASUFOR are encouraging community ownership of the outputs. However, the delivery of faulty equipment (level indicators, rusty staircases, etc.) could undermine the sustainability of the infrastructure. The diesel bill for engines of pumping station electric generators
To take over the management of drinking water supply facilities established with Bank assistance, a Borehole Users’ Association (ASUFOR) has been systematically established with volunteers: a Chairperson, a Secretary-General, a Treasurer, and a driver. However, these structures have been weakened by various problems: rural households are poor and prefer to allocate their income to expenditure items other than payment of their drinking water consumption supplied by the community network, which provides a further explanation for the use of wells and rivers. The number of users in some villages is so low that revenue collected is unable to meet network maintenance costs; furthermore, pumps are powered by electricity generators whose maintenance costs are higher than for electric generators that cannot be envisaged because there are no electricity grids in some villages. ASUFOR officials are volunteers whose benefits are insufficiently motivating to ensure their effective participation and renewal of their mandate upon completion of their mandate.
The Kalounayes ASUFOR (FAK) is a rural community initiative (Coubanao, Finthiock, Mandouar, Coubalan, Djilakoune) in Coubalan municipality set up to resolve water management problems in their territory. The FAK has interconnected all the individual village networks. This option makes it possible to: (i) achieve economies of scale in the purchase of consumables and spare parts; (ii) prevent supply disruptions which occur when a village generator breaks down; (iii) reduce water rates by an equalization payment; (iv) recruit qualified full-time staff to ensure professional management of the water networks (planning and implementation of maintenance works, budget preparation, monthly billing of consumption and recovery of household payments, as well as community sensitization and education, etc.).
However, this organizational model which was successful in Coubalan municipality should be more closely explored to determine the parameters of its success: network size (dimensions, unit costs); minimum number of villages and households (consumption and revenue); membership criteria and break-even price of m3 of water; etc.
Source: Discussions of the Evaluation Team with those concerned in the field, March 2015.
Box 3: ASUFOR Federation: a Model for the Sustainability of Water and Sanitation Infrastructure?
37Evaluation Results of Bank Strategies and Programs
An ID
EV C
ount
ry S
trat
egy
Eval
uatio
n
is unsustainable in light of the revenue collected by the ASUFORs. Electric engines powered either by the electricity grid or by independent solar plants would be more economical, but the connections to the interconnected electric power grid or to rural electrification depends on the public authorities.
Social Development: The combination of the education and health inter-sector approach, diversification of technical and financial partners, involvement of education personnel and beneficiary communities, as well as the search for synergies with existing initiatives could have strengthened the sustainability of outputs but for the many physical defects observed, construction work on flood-prone sites, and especially the lack of a formal financing mechanism and implementation of infrastructure maintenance and upkeep works involving local authorities and communities. Furthermore, teachers do not have the necessary skills to operate the educational equipment installed in schools.
Cross-Cutting Aspects
Gender: The gender issue has been mainstreamed in most operations. With the Bank's support, the Government has embarked upon the definition of a global action plan for gender mainstreaming in public policies as part of the updating of the 2005-2015 SNEEG and operationalization of the gender-disaggregated statistics master plan. The introduction of a quota at the National Assembly culminated in 2012 in a 43% increase in the number of female parliamentarians. Under the business climate-related reforms, women entrepreneurs are especially targeted following adoption of gender-sensitive work tools and receive part of the support and facilities provided. The same applies to rural development projects where women's income-generating activities have received specific support.
Regional Integration: This is at the core of the country's governance. The Bank has provided support to ensure compliance of the national systems with WAEMU community directives and standards. Over the period, 3 cross-border road corridors and structures to the Gambia, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau and Mali were completed. They have improved connectivity with neighbouring countries and helped to increase the volume of trade with these countries between 2009 and 201333. However, there are still some problems, in particular: (i) the failure to apply WAEMU Decision 14 on authorized axle loads; (ii) failure to implement the Convention Regulating Inter-State Road Transportation (ISRT) for goods in transit; and (iii) non-physical impediments by illicit practices of the Police, Customs and Gendarmerie with an estimated 1.3 control points every 100km in 2012, an average of CFAF 1,614 in illicit levies, and 14 minutes lost time34.
Environmental Management: Environmental impact assessments have been systematically conducted, particularly for all private sector operations. However, there have been delays in implementing the Environmental and Social Management Plan in some operations, particularly the Blaise Diagne International Airport and the Sendou Power Plant.
Bank Performance
Bank performance is fairly satisfactory. The national stakeholders are unanimous that the establishment of the Regional Office in Dakar in 2005 has intensified advisory services and technical assistance through more responsive direct contacts, facilitated dialogue with the authorities and non-State actors, and helped the Government to adopt more efficient practices. This particularly concerns the joint annual review, the quarterly internal review, more regular
38 Senegal: Evaluation of the Bank's Country Strategy and Program 2004–2013 Summary Report
supervision, bi-monthly fiduciary clinics, individual coaching of project implementation unit managers and formal bi-monthly monitoring meetings on the implementation of the Portfolio Performance Improvement Plan. In 2012, the Bank organized 6 fiduciary clinics to build technical capacities, compared to 1 in 2011, with 180 and 51 civil servant participants respectively. However, it should be noted that these achievements could be threatened if the project task managers have too heavy a workload, particularly given the increase in the portfolio of operations with the private sector. Indeed, some project task managers, especially those of OPSM and OITC, have a heavy workload with about 5 operations to supervise. However, the Office has fielded over 90% of the required supervision missions (at least twice a year). Their recommendations have not been implemented, and this has hampered project implementation.
Inclusive Growth: The Bank has assisted with the inclusion of disadvantaged groups through job creation and the opening up of new business opportunities. The Youth and Women Employment Promotion Support Project approved in 2013 provides a specific response to this commitment. In the transport sector, 300 direct permanent positions have been created for the operation of the Dakar Port container terminal35. The staff complement of the concessionaire of the Dakar-Diamniadio motorway rose from 141 in 2012 to 250 employees excluding expatriates in December 201436. The opening of over 1200 km of rural roads in 84 rural communities37 under the PPC/PNIR project has created opportunities for income-generating activities among disadvantaged rural communities and facilitated access for women and children to education and health care (Box 1). A similar situation exists along the internal and cross-border road corridors which have helped to reduce poverty among women and youths in the rural localities crossed (see Box 1). The survey conducted during this evaluation showed that
access to drinking water freed up people's time, allowing them to dedicate more time to agro-pastoral activities. In particular, there has been an increase in school attendance by both girls and boys. The participatory process observed in the design and implementation of operations has also contributed to the improvement. Specific mechanisms have also been established in several projects to ensure inclusion of disadvantaged groups.
Transition to Green Growth: The Bank has supported climate change mitigation and adaptation measures in the agriculture sector. The same has been done in irrigation schemes which have improved water management and reduced the vulnerability of farmers to climatic hazards and floods38.
Quality at Entry. Compliance with work frameworks has been reviewed. Unlike the 2002-2004 CSP, the 2005-2009 and 2010-2015 CSPs contain results-based logical framework in compliance with the recommended framework39. However, the performance indicators and their targets are not always comprehensively and accurately specified. Furthermore, the objectives and expected outcomes were determined without defining the means of achieving them. This is the case with the outcomes relating to modernization of the justice system which is not accompanied by specific projects in the 2005-2009 CSP.
Knowledge Management: The Bank completed only one of the 6 ESW studies scheduled between 2010 and 2015. The study, published in March 2015, concerned regional integration challenges and opportunities for Senegal. The Bank has mainly financed project preparation studies and environmental impact assessments. However, on the sidelines of the 2010-2015 CSP indicative lending program, the Bank conducted thirteen economic and sector work studies between 2010
39Evaluation Results of Bank Strategies and Programs
An ID
EV C
ount
ry S
trat
egy
Eval
uatio
n
and 201540. Furthermore, the Bank opened a knowledge and virtual resource centre at its Dakar Regional Office in April 2012, with a view to making knowledge products available to the general public. In 2012, this centre received 96 visitors and 156 in 2013. Finally, the Regional Office has placed advertisements in local newspapers and magazines, and distributed leaflets since 2011. In 2011, 2012 and 2013, the Bank placed 10, 13 and 16 advertisements and disseminated 1, 2 and 3 publications respectively.
Innovative Practices: On the Bank's advice, the Government prepares a six-monthly project portfolio review, with the participation of civil society and the private sector, particularly employers' associations and consular chambers. This exercise has been expanded by the Government to its cooperation with all the other partners. Discussions with the country team and MEFP task managers revealed that the Bank is considering initiating PPP in sectors other than energy and transport infrastructure. In agriculture, for example, preliminary studies on two PPP initiatives are ongoing: the Rice Value Chain Development Project in partnership with the NOVEL Group and the Rice Project of Saint-Louis Agricultural Company, Senegal (CASL former Afric Agri) in the rural community of Diama.
Policy Dialogue: The Bank has assisted the Government in taking measures to establish appropriate regulatory frameworks in the sectors concerned and a Framework Law on PPPs as part of the public sector reforms in order to achieve the priority objective of strong and redistributive growth to roll back poverty by 50%. The Bank and Government of Senegal have also been increasingly successful in mobilizing public and private sector window financing by turning, if necessary, to private investors grouped together in public-private partnerships (PPP) for large-scale infrastructure, especially in the transport
and electric power sectors over the period concerned. The Bank has contributed, through specific economic and sector work, preliminary feasibility studies, as well as detailed risk assessments. Against a backdrop of political stability and commitment of the authorities to pursue and deepen reforms, Senegal has thus become the leader in the sub-region in the development of PPP projects41. The Bank has assumed a leadership role in financing and has gathered private investors around the table in public-private partnerships (PPP). It is positioned as the leader for public-private partnership (PPP) initiatives among the country's main partners (AFD, IsDB, WADB, IDC, etc.).
Coordination and complementarity with the other partners: The Bank consults with Senegal's other partners within the various policy dialogue and working groups it periodically chairs or co-chairs (Group of 50, Group of 12, ACAB Group, Statistics and Energy Thematic Group, etc.). It participates in the self-evaluation of aid coordination mechanisms. In the field, the Bank has pioneered, through the Health Project II, the introduction of the emergency obstetric care strategy and the decentralization of referral health centres, and this has created a conducive environment for Belgian Technical Cooperation to introduce district surgery.
Leverage Effect: The Bank was ranked 6th in 2012 among Senegal's forty-odd development partners42. The number of projects cofinanced by the Bank rose from 4 to 12 between 2008 and 2013. The number of operations with the private sector (transport and energy economic infrastructure) rose from 1 to 6, respectively corresponding to €7.25 million and €162.99 million i.e. a 2148 % increase over the period. Consequently, the catalytic role of the Bank's private sector investment has strengthened. However, compared to its peers, the Bank
40 Senegal: Evaluation of the Bank's Country Strategy and Program 2004–2013 Summary Report
is perceived as slow in administration with cumbersome and complex procedures.
Results-Based Management: The monitoring/evaluation system focuses more on processes and outputs than on their impact on the beneficiaries. Where it exists, monitoring/evaluation data is scattered among the PIUs. It is not available in the Government services in which the PIUs are anchored. Furthermore, the MEFP Investment Department regrets its sidelining from private sector monitoring operations. Nor is there a systematic mechanism by which lessons learned from the implementation experience of Bank operations or economic and sector work are used in the design of new operations, although there are isolated cases such as the Resilience Project (PRSS) which draws on the PAPIL.
Country Performance
The country performance is fairly satisfactory. The country's strategic priorities are clear in the various national development planning documents (PRSP I, PRSP II, SNDES, PES, SCA). The efforts made by Senegal in governance reforms and development outcome management have enabled the country to obtain increased support from its development partners. Official development
assistance (ODA) rose from CFAF 479 billion to CFAF 697 billion between 2010 and 201244, i.e. a 45.5% increase. Aid coordination by the Government has been strengthened, as reflected in the preparation of the annual Development Cooperation Report (DCR) since 2012. In the water and sanitation sector, the Government established an institutional mechanism in 2005 to ensure successful design, financing and implementation of public policy: the policy letter, Millennium Drinking Water and Sanitation Program (PEPAM), the donor round table with the private sector, and the bilateral and multilateral Technical and Financial Partners' Consultative Committee (CCPTF) of which the Bank is a member, under the leadership of the MEFP's DCEF. The donors have formed various thematic groups which consult regularly with the authorities. The Government consults non-State actors, especially the private sector and civil society, through meetings held once or twice a year or involves them in periodic joint reviews.
The MEFP, which administers development cooperation, contributes significantly to supervision mission aide-memoires, although the recommendations agreed upon are not always implemented. According to the parties concerned, PIU performances have improved since July 2003 with the adoption of quarterly
Table 7: Public-Private Partnership (PPP) in Senegal43
Project SAP Code Sector Approval Date Status Net Amount Approved (UA)
Kounoune Thermal Power Plant P-SN-FAA-001 Energy 22-06-05 Ongoing 6 409 484.73
Dakar Container Terminal P-SN-DD0-002 Transport 20-07-09 Ongoing 17 671 591.15
Sendou Coal-Fired Power Plant Project
P-SN-F00-004 Energy 25-11-09 Ongoing 48 596 875.66
Dakar Toll Motorway P-SN-DB0-012 Transport 19-07-10 Ongoing 8 367 207.68
Blaise Diagne International Airport (AIDB)
P-SN-DA0-001 Transport 17-12-10 Ongoing 61 850 569.03
Total 142 895 728.3Source: National reports on the status of education from 2000 to 2011 and SimulPDEF Phase 3.
41Evaluation Results of Bank Strategies and Programs
An ID
EV C
ount
ry S
trat
egy
Eval
uatio
n
internal reviews and annual joint reviews with the Bank. However, the following problems remain: difficulties in mobilizing counterpart funds, delays in the fulfillment of conditions precedent to the first disbursement as well as the start-up of activities, delays in the submission of audit reports; concentration of monitoring and decision-making powers and slow procedures, lack of
firmness of the energy sector regulator in settling disputes relating to the implementation of public-private partnerships between actors; instability of project implementation unit coordinators; delays, additional costs and poor quality of structures due to the malfunctioning of procurement procedures, especially in the education, health and agriculture sectors.
The gender issue has been mainstreamed in most operations. With the Bank's support, the Government has embarked upon the definition of a global action plan for gender mainstreaming in public policies as part of the updating of the 2005-2015 SNEEG and operationalization of the gender-disaggregated statistics master plan. The introduction of a quota at the National Assembly culminated in 2012 in a 43% increase in the number of female parliamentarians.
Photo/ Presidency of Republic of Senegal
Photo credit/CERD
This report concludes that, “while the Bank has successfully aligned its operational program with the Government's development policy priorities and the expectations, it lacks selectivity and its strategic positioning does not stem from a deliberate choice.”
43Conclusions and Recommendations
An ID
EV C
ount
ry S
trat
egy
Eval
uatio
n
Conclusions and Recommendations
Main Conclusions and Lessons Learned
Overall, the Bank has successfully aligned its operational program with the Government's development policy priorities and the expectations of the population and economic agents, thanks mainly to the Results-Based CSP framework, the clarity of the government's priorities, and the practice of consultation involving the private sector and non-State actors. However, it lacks selectivity and its strategic positioning does not stem from a deliberate choice.
The Bank has implemented many operations in all the priority sectors. Despite difficult operating conditions, the transport infrastructure has helped to improve urban mobility and cross-border trade, as well as develop local economies in rural areas. One of the main lessons learned from this evaluation is that the development of rural roads is a promising means of deepening decentralization and transforming local economies to reduce rural poverty.
Public management reforms have helped to establish good governance structures and institutions. However, the reforms encountered coordination and collaboration problems. One budget support-related lesson is that it is a relevant and effective instrument only under certain conditions: (i) the authorities and entities in charge of implementation assume ownership of the governance reforms; (ii) the measures recommended in the various administrative services are coherent; (iii) program
design adopts a holistic and systemic approach to problem resolution; and (iv) project management technical capacities (procurement, disbursements etc.) of actors of community-based projects are developed.
Irrigation schemes and multifaceted support to farmers and stock breeders have increased the sown areas and local production. However, a general decline in yields has been observed. The water and sanitation facilities have not helped to achieve the set objectives. The electric power generation and distribution initiatives have been implemented, but operational difficulties have prevented households and businesses from obtaining more affordable electric power. More generally, one lesson concerning small infrastructure development projects and the adoption of agricultural technology aimed at building the resilience of rural communities is that their success depends on: (i) the experience and commitment of the project implementation teams; (ii) simplified but rigorous procurement procedures; (iii) the development of partnerships; (iv) effective communication; and (v) an integrated value chain approach.
Cost overruns are almost systematic in the construction of health care facilities and are sources of dissatisfaction. The same applies to the energy sector where the slippage on start-up of the Sendou coal-fired power plant has resulted in significant additional costs, despite lower unit and supervision costs. The poor performance of the Dakar Sanitation Project has affected the efficiency of the Bank's portfolio in the water and sanitation
44 Senegal: Evaluation of the Bank's Country Strategy and Program 2004–2013 Summary Report
sector, where the unit cost of drinking water supply is, however, at the midpoint performance of Senegal's other partners.
The contribution of the State Budget to FERA is unpredictable, and this undermines implementation of the annual road maintenance program and sustainability of economic benefits in the transport sector. Indeed, the FERA budget execution rate is low (67% in 2014 out of CFAF 34 billion budgeted, with CFAF 7 billion expected from the State Budget). Additional costs are estimated at CFAF 35 billion per year more than the FERA budget. In the energy sector, the gradual reduction of the government tariff compensation could make it possible to achieve financial viability. Arrangements for ensuring maintenance of water and sanitation structures are inadequate. In the governance sector, reform measures are not applied comprehensively and thoroughly by the public administrations. In education and health, defects, design flaws and the lack of training of staff in the use and maintenance of ultra-modern equipment could jeopardize sustainability of the infrastructure constructed. Works quality control and strict application of sanctions against defaulting contractors on public contracts are requirements for the structures constructed.
The Bank has contributed to the inclusion of disadvantaged groups, particularly women and youths, by creating jobs and new income-generating activity opportunities in the priority sectors. However,
the beneficiaries are often unaware of the Bank's achievements due to lack of communication. The Bank has supported the transition to green growth through climate change mitigation and adaptation measures in the agriculture sector. However, implementation of the environmental and social management plan has not been systematic.
Finally, the Bank has established itself in its role as driver of private investment through PPPs. There are many development opportunities in this area. Indeed, electric power demand exceeds supply (at national level, distribution covers 50% of households and 8% of businesses) and the sector is financially viable given the reduction in the government tariff compensation and improved operating conditions. Similarly, water and sanitation access rates remain low (in urban areas, the sanitation access rate is 35.6% and the drinking water access rate is 81.2% compared to the respective targets of 78% and 100%). In rural areas, the sanitation access rate is 40% and the drinking water access rate is 60% compared to the respective targets of 20% and 82%), and the related infrastructure represents a profitable investment from an economic and social standpoint. Agriculture also provides private investors with opportunities, especially in the development of value chains, which is fully in keeping with the Government's priority of diversifying the Senegalese economy. However, knowledge management is not yet systematic, and cumbersome procedures negatively affect the Bank's performance.
45Conclusions and Recommendations
An ID
EV C
ount
ry S
trat
egy
Eval
uatio
n
Recommendations
Strengthen the Bank's strategic positioning. Greater selectivity of intervention areas, based on adequate analytical studies, is recommended to allow the Bank to optimize its development outcomes. In order to transform the local economies and reduce poverty, the Bank could, by targeting specific areas: (i) invest in the development of rural roads as a complement to the main highways; and (ii) seize existing opportunities for public-private partnerships (PPP) to increase its catalytic impact in the energy, water and sanitation, agriculture and rural development sectors. With regard to governance, deepening of the ongoing reforms and support for more effective functioning of the structures and institutions could have more significant effects and help the country to pursue progress, especially regarding the business environment.
Ensure the sustainability of infrastructures. For roads in particular, one of the areas of dialogue with the Government is the establishment of a mechanism that will ensure timely contribution
of the State Budget to the Autonomous Road Maintenance Fund in compliance with the Annual Road Maintenance Program. Furthermore, closer involvement of community-based organizations in the management of local infrastructure should be considered in the implementation of the Bank's procedures not only in terms of consultation but also of participation in management through the award of contracts.
Improve the effectiveness of project/program supervision through three complementary actions: (i) assist the Government in establishing an efficient national results-based monitoring/evaluation system, which could also provide the Bank with reliable data on implementation performances and development outcomes; (ii) organize supervision missions to cover all the relevant aspects, including closer monitoring of the implementation of environmental management plans and quality control to prevent the numerous physical defects in some structures; and (iii) ensure compliance with the implementation of supervision mission recommendations.
Photo/World Bank
Irrigation schemes and multifaceted support to farmers and stock breeders have increased the sown areas and local production. However, a general decline in yields has been observed.
Annexes
48 Senegal: Evaluation of the Bank's Country Strategy and Program 2004–2013 Summary Report
Annex A: Methodology Description
Data and Sources
The data concerns the Bank's strategies and programs at country level as defined in the CSPs, priority sectors and implementation of operations.
In the case of data relating to the description of the Bank's strategies and the priority sectors over the period under consideration, the 2010-2015, 2005-2009 and 2002-2004 CSPs were recovered from the DARMS database of the Bank's Intranet. Data concerning operations was drawn from the Bank's SAP database, periodic reports, back-to-office supervision mission reports, validation reports of completion reports available in DARMS or from task managers.
A consolidated database of Bank operations in Senegal has been compiled in MS Excel format. For each operation completed (and ongoing in the case of the governance sector), an individual evaluation sheet was prepared to provide information on the results achieved and the implementation arrangements. This sheet is divided into three sections: (a) one section for the collection of information relating to the basic data of the project concerned; (b) one section presents the components of the project set-up, such as the intervention area, outcomes and activities; and (c) the final section concerns the indicators defined for the evaluation (see Annex 2). For each indicator, the expected or estimated value is presented alongside the value noted by the evaluator. These values may be qualitative or quantitative.
Data extracted from the documentary review have been triangulated with primary qualitative and quantitative data collected from the various actors: Bank teams, Ministries and Government services concerned in Senegal, project implementation teams, beneficiaries, civil society, private sector economic operators, sector experts, etc.
Data Collection Methods
Data was collected by different means: (a) documentary review; (b) semi-structured discussions with the various groups concerned and experts; (c) administration of a questionnaire; and (d) direct observation during a quick field survey.
Sampling of Sites and Respondents
This evaluation constitutes a key component of the CEDR. It focuses on a description of the results achieved by the implementation of operations financed by the Bank in Senegal between 2004 and 2013.
49Annexes
An ID
EV C
ount
ry S
trat
egy
Eval
uatio
n
Because of budget and time constraints and to ensure adequate geographical representation, the quick survey concerned completed and closed projects45, as well as ongoing projects at an advanced stage of implementation with outputs and if possible immediate outcomes.
Table A1: Distribution of Projects Concerned by the Evaluation (by sector and implementation status)
Sectors Implementation Status Total Number of ProjectsApproved Completed Closed Ongoing
Agriculture and Rural Development
1 5 1 4 11
Transport 1 0 1 7 9
Multi-Sector (Governance) 0 1 3 4 8
Water and Sanitation 1 3 1 1 6
Social Development 1 2 0 0 3
Energy 1 0 0 2 3
Total 5 11 6 18 40
Source: Extract from AfDB SAP Database, August 2014.
Table A2: Sampling of Sites and Respondents
Region Department Arrondissement (Administrative District)
Municipality Total
Dakar Dakar Dakar 74
Rufisque Rufisque Diamniadio 3
Sendou 4
Sangalkame Kounoune 3
Fatick Fatick Fatick Fatick 7
Foudiougne Foudiougne 3
Toubacouta Keur Saloum Diané 3
Keur Samba Guèye 6
Toubacouta 2
Kaffrine Kaffrine Kaffrine Kaffrine 9
Gniby 10
Maka-Yop Ida Mouride 3
Sagna Sagna 10
Ndiobene Samba Lama 10
Kaolack Kaolack Passi 2
Kaolack 28
Kedougou Kédougou Bandafassi Bandafassi 3
Kedougou Kedougou 12
Saraya Saraya 4
Moussala 4
50 Senegal: Evaluation of the Bank's Country Strategy and Program 2004–2013 Summary Report
Region Department Arrondissement (Administrative District)
Municipality Total
Kolda Kolda Kolda 7
Dabo Dabo 2
Bagadadji 2
Mampatim 3
Dioulacolon Dioulacolon 2
Médina El Hadj 3
Saré Bidji 3
Tankanto Escale 1
Medina Yorofoula Medina Yorofoula 12
Nianing Nianing 10
Vélingara Saré Coli Sale Diaoubé 10
Louga Kébémer Kébémer 3
Darou Mousty Waréane 3
Ndande Fass 1
Linguère Barkedji Gassane - Barkédji 7
Sagatta Dioloff Sagatta Dioloff 4
Louga Louga 10
Keur Momar Sarr Keur Momar Sarr 3
Ngeur Malal 12
Mbediène Nguidillé 4
Sakal Léona 2
Nguène-Sarr 12
Sakal 5
Matam Ranérou-Ferlo Vélingara Ranérou 3
Kanel Kanel 1
Matam 13
Saint-Louis Dagana Dagana 3
Mbane Gaé 4
Mbane 3
Saint-Louis Saint-Louis 10
Sédhiou Sédhiou Sédhiou 4
Sansamba 10
Tambacounda Tambacounda Tambacounda 14
Djamweli 10
Missirah Netteboulou 10
Missirah 1
Dialacoto 10
Thiès Mbour Mbour 4
Ziguinchor Bignona Tenghory Niamone 10
Koubalan 10
Tenghory 20
Oussouye Oussouye 2
Ziguinchor Ziguinchor 17
Total 480
51Annexes
An ID
EV C
ount
ry S
trat
egy
Eval
uatio
n
Port
folio
of P
roje
cts
incl
uded
in th
e Ev
alua
tion
Proj
ects
App
rove
d be
twee
n 20
04 a
nd 2
013
Proj
ect C
ode
Proj
ect N
ame
Stat
usAp
prov
al D
ate
Sect
orNe
t Am
ount
(UA
)So
urce
of
Fina
ncin
g20
02 -
200
4 C
SPP-
Z1-A
A0-0
85In
vasi
ve A
quat
ic W
eeds
Clos
ed22
-09-
04Ag
ricul
ture
1,98
8,30
1.37
ADF
P-SN
-FA0
-002
Rura
l Ele
ctrifi
catio
n Pr
ojec
tOn
goin
g13
-10-
04En
ergy
9,58
0,00
0.00
ADF
2005
- 2
009
CSP
P-SN
-KZ0
-003
Land
Reg
istra
tion
Mod
erni
zatio
n Pr
ojec
t (P
AMOC
A)Cl
osed
22-0
4-05
Mul
tisec
tor
2,19
5,68
1.12
ADF
P-SN
-FAA
-001
Koun
oune
The
rmal
Pow
er P
lant
Ongo
ing
22-0
6-05
Ener
gy6,
409,
484.
73Af
DB
P-SN
-DB0
-008
Road
Mai
nten
ance
Pro
ject
Clos
ed29
-06-
05Tr
ansp
ort
27,1
95,0
51.9
2AD
F
P-SN
-E00
-003
Rura
l DW
SS P
roje
ctCl
osed
21-0
9-05
Wat
er a
nd
Sani
tatio
n24
,921
,588
.79
ADF
P-SN
-A00
-001
Casa
man
ce R
ural
Dev
elop
men
t (PA
DERC
A)On
goin
g19
-10-
05Ag
ricul
ture
20,0
00,0
00.0
0AD
F
P-Z1
-DB0
-013
Road
Dev
elop
men
t and
Tra
nspo
rt Fa
cilit
atio
n Pr
ogra
m:
Sout
hern
Bam
ako-
Daka
r Co
rrido
r
Ongo
ing
21-1
2-05
Tran
spor
t14
,449
,536
.82
ADF/
ACFA
P-Z1
-AAE
-010
Sust
aina
ble
Man
agem
ent o
f End
emic
Ru
min
ant L
ivest
ock
in W
est A
frica
- S
eneg
alOn
goin
g25
-01-
06Ag
ricul
ture
4,44
0,00
0.00
ADF
P-Z1
-DB0
-029
Labé
- S
érib
a - T
amba
coun
da R
oad
Ongo
ing
04-1
2-06
Tran
spor
t20
,500
,000
.00
ADF
P-SN
-EB0
-002
Zigu
inch
or S
anita
tion
Mas
ter P
lan
Com
plet
ed22
-12-
06W
ater
and
Sa
nita
tion
826,
146.
89AW
F
P-SN
-EAZ
-002
Impl
emen
tatio
n of
PAG
IRE
in S
eneg
alCo
mpl
eted
31-0
8-07
Wat
er a
nd
Sani
tatio
n1,
396,
055.
70AW
F
P-SN
-K00
-005
Pove
rty R
educ
tion
Stra
tegy
Sup
port
Proj
ect
Com
plet
ed22
-12-
08M
ultis
ecto
r30
,000
,000
.00
ADF
P-SN
-E00
-004
Seco
nd R
ural
DW
SS S
ub-P
rogr
amOn
goin
g18
-02-
09W
ater
and
Sa
nita
tion
30,0
00,0
00.0
0AD
F
P-SN
-DB0
-010
Daka
r-Di
amni
adio
Mot
orw
ayOn
goin
g15
-07-
09Tr
ansp
ort
45,0
00,0
00.0
0AD
F
P-SN
-DD0
-002
Daka
r Con
tain
er T
erm
inal
Ongo
ing
20-0
7-09
Tran
spor
t17
,671
,591
.15
AfDB
P-SN
-F00
-004
Send
ou C
oal-F
ired
Pow
er P
lant
Pro
ject
Appr
oved
25-1
1-09
Ener
gy48
,596
,875
.66
AfDB
2010
- 2
015
P-SN
-DB0
-012
Daka
r Tol
l Mot
orw
ayOn
goin
g19
-07-
10Tr
ansp
ort
8,36
7,20
7.68
AfDB
P-SN
-DB0
-017
Lend
ing
Oper
atio
ns -
Priv
ate
Sect
orAp
prov
ed19
-07-
10Tr
ansp
ort
1,32
5,36
9.34
AfDB
P-SN
-DA0
-001
Blai
se D
iagn
e In
tern
atio
nal A
irpor
t (AI
BD)
Ongo
ing
17-1
2-10
Tran
spor
t61
,850
,569
.03
AfDB
52 Senegal: Evaluation of the Bank's Country Strategy and Program 2004–2013 Summary Report
Proj
ect C
ode
Proj
ect N
ame
Stat
usAp
prov
al D
ate
Sect
orNe
t Am
ount
(UA
)So
urce
of
Fina
ncin
g20
10 -
201
5P-
SN-A
AC-0
03PA
PIL
Supp
lem
enta
ry L
oan
Ongo
ing
31-0
1-11
Agric
ultu
re8,
400,
000.
00AD
F
P-SN
-K00
-006
Econ
omic
Ref
orm
Sup
port
Prog
ram
(PAR
E)Cl
osed
06-0
7-11
Mul
tisec
tor
27,0
00,0
00.0
0AD
F
P-Z1
-DB0
-046
Cons
truct
ion
of th
e Tr
ans-
Gam
bia
Brid
ge a
nd C
ross
-Bo
rder
Impr
ovem
ent
Ongo
ing
16-1
2-11
Tran
spor
t3,
180,
000.
00AD
F
P-SN
-A00
-006
Emer
genc
y Hu
man
itaria
n As
sist
ance
to R
ural
Are
as.
Com
plet
ed10
-09-
12Ag
ricul
ture
650,
935.
72Sp
ecia
l Rel
ief
Fund
P-SN
-KA0
-008
Lend
ing
Oper
atio
ns -
Pub
lic S
ecto
r (Pr
ivate
Sec
tor
Prom
otio
n Su
ppor
t Pro
gram
)On
goin
g10
-09-
12M
ultis
ecto
r4,
040,
000.
00AD
F
P-SN
-EBZ
-001
Colle
ctio
n, M
anag
emen
t and
Dra
inag
e of
Slu
dge
in
Zigu
inch
orAp
prov
ed23
-04-
13W
ater
and
Sa
nita
tion
113,
310.
24AW
F
P-SN
-A00
-005
Food
Sec
urity
Sup
port
Proj
ect i
n Lo
uga,
Mat
am a
nd
Kaffr
ine
regi
ons
Ongo
ing
26-0
4-13
Agric
ultu
re28
,037
,428
.80
ADF/
GAFS
P
P-SN
-K00
-008
Incl
usive
Gro
wth
Sup
port
Prog
ram
(PAC
ICE)
Ongo
ing
19-0
6-13
Mul
tisec
tor
25,5
40,0
00.0
0AD
F
P-SN
-KE0
-001
The
Com
mun
ity R
oads
Pro
ject
in s
uppo
rt of
the
Natio
nal
Loca
l Dev
elop
men
t Pro
gram
Pha
se II
Ongo
ing
17-0
7-13
Mul
tisec
tor
15,0
00,0
00.0
0AD
F
P-SN
-KB0
-001
VoLo
Afri
ca T
rust
Info
rmat
ion
and
Cred
it Bu
reau
Pilo
t Pr
ojec
tOn
goin
g05
-08-
13M
ultis
ecto
r18
5,17
2.99
Fund
for A
frica
n Pr
ivate
Sec
tor
Assi
stan
ce
P-SN
-A00
-004
Proj
ect t
o Re
stor
e th
e Ec
olog
ical
and
Eco
nom
ic
Func
tions
of L
ake
Guie
rsAp
prov
ed04
-09-
13Ag
ricul
ture
15,8
56,3
22.2
1AD
F/FE
M
P-SN
-IAZ-
001
Proj
ect t
o Su
ppor
t the
Pro
mot
ion
of E
mpl
oym
ent f
or Y
outh
an
d W
omen
Appr
oved
23-1
0-13
Soci
al21
,190
,000
.00
ADF
TOTA
L (in
UA)
525,
906,
630.
16
* Gl
obal
Agr
icul
ture
and
Foo
d Se
curit
y Pr
ogra
m (G
AFSP
)
53Annexes
An ID
EV C
ount
ry S
trat
egy
Eval
uatio
n
Proj
ect N
ame
Stat
us*
Appr
oval
Dat
e Se
ctor
Net A
mou
nt (U
A)So
urce
of F
inan
cing
Live
stoc
k Pr
ojec
t II
Com
plet
ed17
-05-
00Ag
ricul
ture
13,4
04,7
26.9
8AD
F/IA
DM
Anam
be B
asin
Rur
al D
evel
opm
ent S
uppo
rt Pr
ojec
tCo
mpl
eted
25-0
4-01
Agric
ultu
re7,
414,
391.
96AD
F/IA
DM
Daka
r San
itatio
n Pr
ojec
tCo
mpl
eted
12-0
7-01
Wat
er a
nd S
anita
tion
11,8
88,2
79.2
9AD
F/IA
DM
Rura
l Inf
rast
ruct
ure
Proj
ect
Com
plet
ed03
-04-
02Ag
ricul
ture
16,3
27,7
12.8
3AD
F/IA
DM/O
PEP
Supp
ort f
or th
e De
partm
ent o
f For
ecas
ts a
nd S
tatis
tics.
Clos
ed12
-12-
02M
ultis
ecto
r13
3,91
9,10
4.00
ADF
Heal
th II
Com
plet
ed18
-06-
03So
cial
11,5
67,2
83.5
4AD
F/IA
DM
Educ
atio
n IV
Com
plet
ed25
-06-
03So
cial
15,0
02,2
64.4
6AD
F/IA
DM
Loca
l Sm
all-S
cale
Irrig
atio
n Su
ppor
t Pro
ject
(PAP
IL)
Com
plet
ed22
-10-
03Ag
ricul
ture
14,3
10,0
00.0
0AD
F
Tota
l22
3,83
3,76
3.06
Proj
ects
App
rove
d af
ter 2
000
and
Com
plet
ed b
etw
een
2004
and
201
3
54 Senegal: Evaluation of the Bank's Country Strategy and Program 2004–2013 Summary Report
Ann
ex 2
: Eva
luat
ion
Mat
rice
sRe
leva
nce
and
Sust
aina
bilit
y Ev
alua
tion
Crite
riaSp
ecifi
c Qu
estio
ns
for S
eneg
alM
etho
dolo
gica
l Ap
proa
chM
ain
Indi
cato
rsNe
cess
ary
Data
Data
Sou
rces
Data
Col
lect
ion
Met
hods
Data
Ana
lysi
s M
etho
dsRe
leva
nce
1. T
o w
hat e
xten
t is
the
Bank
’s c
ount
ry
stra
tegy
rele
vant
in
rela
tion
to th
e co
untry
’s s
trate
gic
deve
lopm
ent
fram
ewor
k?
In th
e co
untry
fra
mew
ork
docu
men
ts
and
CSPs
, com
pare
th
e al
ignm
ent e
lem
ent
by e
lem
ent o
f: (i)
st
rate
gic
obje
ctive
s (ii
) spe
cific
obj
ectiv
es
and
(iii)
oper
atio
ns
impl
emen
ted
1. L
evel
of a
lignm
ent
of s
trate
gies
Obje
ctive
s, o
utco
mes
an
d ac
tiviti
es p
lann
ed
by G
over
nmen
t ove
r th
e pe
riod;
Obj
ectiv
es,
outc
omes
and
pro
ject
s pl
anne
d un
der t
he
CSPs
Natio
nal s
trate
gy
docu
men
ts; C
SPEx
tract
ion
from
do
cum
ents
Freq
uenc
y an
alys
is;
biva
riate
ana
lysis
(c
ontin
genc
y ta
bles
)
2. T
o w
hat e
xten
t is
the
Bank
’s c
ount
ry
stra
tegy
rele
vant
in
rela
tion
to th
e ta
rget
gr
oups
of t
he B
ank'
s op
erat
ions
?
In th
e co
untry
's
fram
ewor
k do
cum
ents
an
d di
ffere
nt s
tudi
es
on th
e co
untry
in
clud
ing
AfDB
/ES
W, c
ompa
re: (
i) th
e ob
ject
ives
of o
ngoi
ng/
com
plet
ed p
roje
cts,
an
d (ii
) pro
blem
s/ne
eds
iden
tified
and
ex
pect
ed o
utco
mes
at
targ
et g
roup
leve
l.
2. E
xten
t of
cons
iste
ncy
betw
een
the
Bank
’s o
pera
tions
an
d th
e re
quire
men
ts
of th
e ta
rget
po
pula
tion.
Prob
lem
s/pr
iorit
y de
velo
pmen
t nee
ds
of th
e ta
rget
are
a co
mm
uniti
es;
obje
ctive
s, o
utco
mes
an
d pr
ojec
ts
impl
emen
ted
on A
fDB
finan
cing
Vario
us e
cono
mic
an
d so
cial
stu
dies
; ne
wsp
aper
arti
cles
; st
akeh
olde
rs (S
NFO,
NG
Os, e
xper
ts,
auth
oriti
es)
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts; q
uick
su
rvey
(sem
i-st
ruct
ured
dis
cuss
ions
) w
ith s
take
hold
ers
Freq
uenc
y an
alys
is;
biva
riate
ana
lysis
(c
ontin
genc
y ta
bles
)
55Annexes
An ID
EV C
ount
ry S
trat
egy
Eval
uatio
n
Eval
uatio
n Cr
iteria
Spec
ific
Ques
tions
fo
r Sen
egal
Met
hodo
logi
cal
Appr
oach
Mai
n In
dica
tors
Nece
ssar
y Da
taDa
ta S
ourc
esDa
ta C
olle
ctio
n M
etho
dsDa
ta A
naly
sis
Met
hods
Sust
aina
bilit
y4.
To
wha
t ext
ent a
re
the
outc
omes
like
ly to
be
mai
ntai
ned
follo
win
g co
mpl
etio
n of
th
e Ba
nk’s
ass
ista
nce?
(a) I
dent
ify th
e co
nditi
ons
requ
ired
for s
usta
inab
ility
of
the
achi
evem
ents
: te
chni
cal c
apac
ities
, so
urce
s of
fina
ncin
g fo
r ope
ratin
g co
sts,
po
pula
tion
trend
s, e
tc.
(b) A
nalyz
e ex
istin
g co
nditi
ons
and
asse
ss
thei
r im
pact
on
the
sust
aina
bilit
y of
ac
hiev
emen
ts
a. R
egul
arity
(ann
ual
rate
) of c
ount
erpa
rt fu
nd d
isbu
rsem
ents
Proj
ect d
isbu
rsem
ent
stat
istic
sPr
ojec
t doc
umen
ts
(IPRR
, MTR
, PCR
); na
tiona
l sec
tor
stud
ies;
sta
keho
lder
s (e
xper
ts, m
inis
tries
/im
plem
enta
tion
units
)
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts;
Tabl
es a
nd fi
gure
s
b. %
of P
IUs
inte
grat
ed
into
adm
inis
tratio
nLi
st o
f ove
rsig
ht
adm
inis
tratio
ns a
nd
PIU
Proj
ect d
ocum
ents
; DC
EF d
ocum
ents
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts;
Hist
ogra
m
Exis
tenc
e of
a
mec
hani
sm to
ens
ure
the
sust
aina
bilit
y of
ac
hiev
emen
ts
DCEF
doc
umen
tsEx
tract
ion
from
do
cum
ents
;
Exis
tenc
e of
a
mec
hani
sm fo
r the
su
stai
nabi
lity
of
achi
evem
ents
in
each
op
erat
ion
Proj
ect d
ocum
ents
;Ex
tract
ion
from
do
cum
ents
;Fr
eque
ncy
anal
ysis
; Hi
stog
ram
Com
mun
ity
parti
cipa
tion
in
proj
ect d
esig
n an
d im
plem
enta
tion
Proj
ect d
ocum
ents
; di
scus
sion
s w
ith th
ose
conc
erne
d
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts;
disc
ussi
ons
with
pa
rties
con
cern
ed
(qui
ck s
urve
y)
Freq
uenc
y an
alys
is;
Hist
ogra
m
Targ
et g
roup
s ha
ve
rece
ived
spec
ific
train
ing
to b
e ab
le to
ta
ke o
ver
Proj
ect d
ocum
ents
; di
scus
sion
s w
ith th
ose
conc
erne
d
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts;
Freq
uenc
y an
alys
is;
Hist
ogra
m
Exis
tenc
e of
sou
rces
of
reve
nue
to fi
nanc
e re
curre
nt c
osts
in th
e pr
ojec
t im
plem
enta
tion
mec
hani
sm
Proj
ect d
ocum
ents
; di
scus
sion
s w
ith th
ose
conc
erne
d
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts;
disc
ussi
ons
with
pa
rties
con
cern
ed
(qui
ck s
urve
y)
Freq
uenc
y an
alys
is;
Hist
ogra
m
56 Senegal: Evaluation of the Bank's Country Strategy and Program 2004–2013 Summary Report
Effic
ienc
y
Eval
uatio
n Cr
iteria
Spec
ific
Ques
tions
fo
r Sen
egal
Met
hodo
logi
cal
Appr
oach
Mai
n In
dica
tors
Nece
ssar
y Da
taDa
ta S
ourc
esDa
ta C
olle
ctio
n M
etho
dsDa
ta A
naly
sis
Met
hods
Effic
ienc
y5.
At w
hat c
osts
(uni
t) di
d th
e Ba
nk a
chie
ve
the
resu
lts o
btai
ned
for S
eneg
al o
ver t
he
2004
-201
3 pe
riod?
Have
mea
sure
s be
en
take
n to
enh
ance
ef
ficie
ncy?
Calc
ulat
e th
e va
rious
co
sts
from
the
proj
ect
docu
men
ts: a
ppra
isal
re
port,
PCR
, PCR
-EN,
QP
AR, a
nnua
l rep
orts
, au
dit r
epor
ts, e
tc.,
MTR
, etc
.
a. O
utpu
t uni
t cos
tsTi
me
serie
sPr
ojec
t doc
umen
ts;
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts;
Curv
es
b. T
otal
pro
ject
ex
pend
iture
Tim
e se
ries
Proj
ect d
ocum
ents
;Ex
tract
ion
from
do
cum
ents
;Cu
rves
c. A
vera
ge p
roje
ct
man
agem
ent c
ost
(coo
rdin
atio
n, M
&E
adm
inis
trativ
e an
d fin
anci
al m
anag
emen
t
Tim
e se
ries
Calc
ulat
ions
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts; a
rithm
etic
ca
lcul
atio
ns
Curv
es
d. %
of c
oord
inat
ion,
M
&E, a
dmin
istra
tive
and
finan
cial
m
anag
emen
t cos
ts
in re
latio
n to
the
tota
l pr
ojec
t cos
t (IF
AD/C
PE,
2014
)
Tim
e se
ries
Calc
ulat
ions
arith
met
ic c
alcu
latio
nsCu
rves
6. W
hat l
evel
of
reso
urce
s w
as
mob
ilized
by
the
Sene
gal O
ffice
dur
ing
the
desi
gn a
nd
impl
emen
tatio
n of
the
Bank
's s
trate
gy o
ver
the
perio
d?
Use
of O
ffice
's in
tern
al
repo
rtse.
Coo
rdin
atio
n, M
&E
adm
inis
trativ
e an
d fin
anci
al m
anag
emen
t co
sts
in re
latio
n to
the
aver
age
for t
he re
gion
an
d th
e Ba
nk (%
)
Tim
e se
ries
arith
met
ic c
alcu
latio
nsCu
rves
Amou
nt o
f Offi
ce's
bu
dget
(in
UA)
Tim
e se
ries
Intra
net:
Revie
w
repo
rts; O
ffice
ad
min
istra
tive
repo
rts
Extra
ctio
nCu
rves
PL/G
S st
aff a
nd tr
end
over
tim
eTi
me
serie
sId
emEx
tract
ion
from
do
cum
ents
Curv
es
Task
man
ager
s'
supe
rvis
ion
wor
kloa
dTi
me
serie
sId
emEx
tract
ion
from
do
cum
ents
; di
scus
sion
s w
ith
parti
es (p
roje
ct ta
sk
man
ager
s)
Curv
es
57Annexes
An ID
EV C
ount
ry S
trat
egy
Eval
uatio
n
Bank
Per
form
ance
Eval
uatio
n Cr
iteria
Spec
ific
Ques
tions
fo
r Sen
egal
Met
hodo
logi
cal
Appr
oach
Mai
n In
dica
tors
Nece
ssar
y Da
taDa
ta S
ourc
esDa
ta C
olle
ctio
n M
etho
dsDa
ta A
naly
sis
Met
hods
Bank
's
Inst
itutio
nal
Perfo
rman
ce
7. T
o w
hat e
xten
t doe
s th
e Ba
nk's
stra
tegy
fo
r the
cou
ntry
re
flect
the
Bank
's
oper
atio
nal p
riorit
ies
(gen
der,
regi
onal
in
tegr
atio
n, c
limat
e ch
ange
, env
ironm
enta
l pr
otec
tion,
etc
.)?
In th
e Ba
nk's
fra
mew
ork
docu
men
ts
(TYS
, med
ium
-ter
m
fram
ewor
ks) a
nd
CSPs
, com
pare
the
alig
nmen
t ele
men
t by
ele
men
t of:
(i)
stra
tegi
c ob
ject
ives
(ii) s
peci
fic o
bjec
tives
an
d (ii
i) op
erat
ions
im
plem
ente
d in
re
latio
n to
wha
t has
be
en d
one
in th
e co
untry
.
a. L
evel
of a
lignm
ent
of s
trate
gies
/pla
ns fo
r th
e re
leva
nt p
erio
d
The
elem
ents
(O
bjec
tives
, out
com
es
and
proj
ects
) pla
nned
un
der t
he C
SPs
and
thos
e a
nd th
ose
of th
e TY
S an
d ot
her B
ank
plan
ning
fram
ewor
ks
Intra
net (
DARM
S)Ex
tract
ion
from
do
cum
ents
Freq
uenc
y an
alys
is;
Hist
ogra
m
8. W
hat i
s th
e qu
ality
of
the
CSP
in te
rms
of
com
plia
nce
with
the
CSP
fram
ewor
k an
d th
e Ba
nk's
rele
vant
op
erat
iona
l gui
delin
es
(whi
ch g
uide
lines
?)?
Com
pare
the
CSPs
an
d th
eir c
onte
nt
with
the
outli
ne
reco
mm
enda
tions
an
d th
e di
ffere
nt
oper
atio
nal g
uide
lines
Leve
l of c
ompl
ianc
e w
ith th
e fra
mew
ork
Diffe
rent
fram
ewor
ks
depe
ndin
g on
the
CSP
pe
riod;
the
CSPs
Intra
net;
SNFO
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts;
disc
ussi
ons
with
co
untry
team
Freq
uenc
y an
alys
is;
Hist
ogra
m
Leve
l of c
ompl
ianc
e w
ith a
pplic
able
op
erat
iona
l gui
delin
es
List
of r
elev
ant B
ank
guid
elin
esIn
trane
t; Ex
tract
ion
from
do
cum
ents
; di
scus
sion
s w
ith
coun
try te
am
Freq
uenc
y an
alys
is;
Hist
ogra
m
9. T
o w
hat e
xten
t are
th
e Ba
nk's
ope
ratio
ns
in S
eneg
al in
clus
ive?
Com
bina
tion
of
met
hods
:(a
) Lis
t the
mai
n ou
tcom
es p
rese
nted
in
the
PCRs
, QPA
R an
d M
TR(b
) Ide
ntify
the
resu
lts
obta
ined
by
dire
ct
obse
rvat
ion
in th
e pr
ojec
t are
a;(c
) Ide
ntify
the
resu
lts
obta
ined
thro
ugh
sem
i-stru
ctur
ed
disc
ussi
ons
with
the
bene
ficia
ries
and
othe
r st
akeh
olde
rs(d
) Com
pare
the
expe
cted
and
act
ual
outc
omes
4a. %
pop
ulat
ion
livin
g be
low
the
natio
nal
pove
rty li
ne
Tim
e se
ries
AfDB
Sta
tistic
sFr
eque
ncy
anal
ysis
; Cu
rves
4b. I
ncom
e in
equa
lity
(Gin
i ind
ex)
Tim
e se
ries
AfDB
Sta
tistic
sFr
eque
ncy
anal
ysis
; Cu
rves
4c/4
d/4e
. Tot
al/Y
outh
/W
omen
une
mpl
oym
ent
rate
(%)
Tim
e se
ries
AfDB
Sta
tistic
sFr
eque
ncy
anal
ysis
; Cu
rves
58 Senegal: Evaluation of the Bank's Country Strategy and Program 2004–2013 Summary Report
Eval
uatio
n Cr
iteria
Spec
ific
Ques
tions
fo
r Sen
egal
Met
hodo
logi
cal
Appr
oach
Mai
n In
dica
tors
Nece
ssar
y Da
taDa
ta S
ourc
esDa
ta C
olle
ctio
n M
etho
dsDa
ta A
naly
sis
Met
hods
Bank
's
Inst
itutio
nal
Perfo
rman
ce
10. T
o w
hat e
xten
t ha
ve th
e Ba
nk's
op
erat
ions
in S
eneg
al
cont
ribut
ed to
gre
en
grow
th?
Com
bina
tion
of
met
hods
:(a
) Lis
t the
mai
n ou
tcom
es p
rese
nted
in
the
PCRs
, QPA
R an
d M
TR(b
) Ide
ntify
the
resu
lts o
btai
ned
by
dire
ct o
bser
vatio
n in
th
e pr
ojec
t are
a;(c
) Id
entif
y th
e re
sults
ob
tain
ed th
roug
h se
mi-s
truct
ured
di
scus
sion
s w
ith th
e be
nefic
iarie
s an
d ot
her
stak
ehol
ders
;(d
) Com
pare
the
expe
cted
and
act
ual
outc
omes
.
a. E
colo
gica
l foo
tprin
t (g
ha)
Tim
e se
ries
Bank
's R
MF;
AfD
B St
atis
tics;
Wor
ld B
ank
Data
Por
tal
Curv
es
5b. N
umbe
r of p
eopl
e af
fect
ed b
y na
tura
l di
sast
ers
Tim
e se
ries
Bank
's R
MF;
AfD
B St
atis
tics;
Wor
ld B
ank
Data
Por
tal
Curv
es
5c. F
ood
inse
curit
y ra
teTi
me
serie
sBa
nk's
RM
F; A
fDB
Stat
istic
s; W
orld
Ban
k Da
ta P
orta
l; FA
O Gl
obal
Ear
ly W
arni
ng
Syst
em
Curv
es
11. W
hat i
s th
e Ba
nk's
per
form
ance
as
a d
evel
opm
ent
partn
er in
the
desi
gn,
impl
emen
tatio
n an
d m
anag
emen
t of
resu
lts?
Com
pare
SNF
O's
outp
uts
in re
latio
n to
th
e ba
sic
indi
cato
r ta
rget
s es
tabl
ishe
d by
ORQ
R re
latin
g to
inst
itutio
nal
perfo
rman
ce
a. N
ote
on B
ank
perfo
rman
ces
(in
rela
tion
to d
imen
sion
s in
the
PCR)
Tim
e se
ries
Annu
al D
evel
opm
ent
Effe
ctive
ness
Rep
orts
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts;
Curv
es
59Annexes
An ID
EV C
ount
ry S
trat
egy
Eval
uatio
n
Sp
ecifi
c Qu
estio
ns
for S
eneg
alM
etho
dolo
gica
l Ap
proa
chM
ain
Indi
cato
rsNe
cess
ary
Data
Data
Sou
rces
Data
Col
lect
ion
Met
hods
Data
Ana
lysi
s M
etho
dsBa
nk's
In
stitu
tiona
l Pe
rform
ance
12. W
hat i
s th
e Ba
nk's
deg
ree
of
sele
ctivi
ty in
its
choi
ce
of o
pera
tions
in th
e co
untry
's p
ortfo
lio?
a. S
earc
h in
the
CSPs
po
ssib
le e
lem
ents
w
hich
sho
w th
at t
he
desi
gn h
as ta
ken
into
ac
coun
t the
sel
ectiv
ity
of in
vest
men
ts a
nd
spec
ific
mea
sure
s ta
ken
in th
is c
onte
xtb.
Iden
tify
the
pref
erre
d se
ctor
s w
hich
wer
e se
lect
ed
durin
g th
e de
sign
an
d im
plem
enta
tion
of th
e CS
P ap
plyi
ng
sele
ctiv
ity a
nd
mea
surin
g th
eir
impo
rtanc
e in
the
Sene
gal p
ortfo
lio a
nd
its tr
end
over
the
perio
d in
term
s of
the
num
ber o
f ope
ratio
ns
and
volu
me
of
com
mitm
ents
Ongo
ing
disc
ussi
on o
n se
lect
ivity
in th
e CS
PFr
eque
ncy
CSP;
PCR
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts;
Freq
uenc
y an
alys
is;
Hist
ogra
m
Sele
ctivi
ty m
easu
res
impl
emen
ted
Freq
uenc
yCS
PEx
tract
ion
from
do
cum
ents
;Li
st o
f mea
sure
s;
Freq
uenc
y an
alys
is;
Hist
ogra
m
Prop
ortio
n of
pro
ject
s in
prio
rity
or s
elec
ted
area
s (%
)
Tim
e se
ries
CSP;
PPR
R; P
CREx
tract
ion
from
do
cum
ents
;Cu
rves
Fina
ncia
l im
porta
nce
of p
roje
cts
in p
riorit
y or
se
lect
ed s
ecto
rs in
the
portf
olio
(%)
Tim
e se
ries
CSP;
PPR
R; P
CRCa
lcul
atio
nsHi
stog
ram
13. W
hat i
s th
e le
vel
of c
ompl
emen
tarit
y of
inst
rum
ents
im
plem
ente
d in
the
CSP
and
syne
rgy
betw
een
publ
ic
and
priva
te s
ecto
r op
erat
ions
?
Coun
t the
num
ber o
f le
ndin
g an
d/or
gra
nt
oper
atio
ns th
at s
hare
co
mm
on o
bjec
tives
or
targ
et th
e sa
me
high
er
resu
lts, a
nd d
eter
min
e th
eir p
ropo
rtion
in
rela
tion
to th
e en
tire
portf
olio
Prop
ortio
n of
le
ndin
g op
erat
ions
sh
arin
g co
mm
on o
r si
mila
r dev
elop
men
t ob
ject
ives
or w
hich
ta
rget
the
sam
e hi
gher
re
sults
Tim
e se
ries
CSP;
PAR
; PPR
R; P
CREx
tract
ion
from
do
cum
ents
;Cu
rves
Bank
's
Inst
itutio
nal
Perfo
rman
ce
14. W
hat a
re th
e m
ain
drive
rs in
the
sele
ctio
n of
stra
tegi
c pr
iorit
ies
at c
ount
ry le
vel a
nd
have
they
cha
nged
ov
er ti
me?
a. In
terv
iew
the
mai
n ac
tors
in th
e co
untry
an
d in
the
Bank
team
an
d if
poss
ible
cro
ss-
chec
k ne
wsp
aper
ar
ticle
s.
List
of e
xpla
nato
ry
fact
ors
Freq
uenc
yCS
P: P
PRR
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts;
disc
ussi
ons
with
pa
rties
con
cern
ed
(cou
ntry
team
, go
vern
men
t and
pu
blic
adm
inis
tratio
ns,
priva
te s
ecto
r, ci
vil
soci
ety)
)
Freq
uenc
y an
alys
is;
Hist
ogra
m
60 Senegal: Evaluation of the Bank's Country Strategy and Program 2004–2013 Summary Report
Eval
uatio
n Cr
iteria
Spec
ific
Ques
tions
fo
r Sen
egal
Met
hodo
logi
cal
Appr
oach
Mai
n In
dica
tors
Nece
ssar
y Da
taDa
ta S
ourc
esDa
ta C
olle
ctio
n M
etho
dsDa
ta A
naly
sis
Met
hods
Bank
's
Inst
itutio
nal
Perfo
rman
ce
15. W
hat i
s th
e Ba
nk's
ef
fect
ivene
ss in
te
rms
of d
evel
opm
ent
partn
ersh
ips?
a. C
ount
the
num
ber
and
asse
ss th
e fin
anci
al im
porta
nce
of
partn
ersh
ips
of w
hich
th
e Ba
nk is
a m
embe
r in
Sen
egal
whe
ther
th
ey a
re in
itiat
ed o
r not
by
the
Bank
.
Num
ber o
f joi
nt
partn
ersh
ips
initi
ated
by
the
Bank
ove
r the
pe
riod
Tim
e se
ries
CSP;
PAR
; PPR
R; P
CREx
tract
ion
from
do
cum
ents
; di
scus
sion
s w
ith
coun
try te
am
Curv
es
Prop
ortio
n of
lend
ing
and
non-
lend
ing
oper
atio
ns in
the
portf
olio
in jo
int
partn
ersh
ips
(%)
Num
ber o
f ope
ratio
ns
in th
e ac
tive
portf
olio
ov
er th
e pe
riod
CSP;
PAR
; PPR
R; P
CREx
tract
ion
from
do
cum
ents
;Cu
rve
Fina
ncia
l im
porta
nce
of le
ndin
g an
d no
n-le
ndin
g op
erat
ions
in
join
t par
tner
ship
s in
th
e po
rtfol
io (%
)
Amou
nt o
f co-
partn
ersh
ips
in th
e ac
tive
portf
olio
ove
r th
e pe
riod
CSP;
PAR
; PPR
R; P
CREx
tract
ion
from
do
cum
ents
;Cu
rve
Amou
nt o
f cofi
nanc
ing
in U
A in
vest
ed in
the
coun
try
Tim
e se
ries
CSP;
PAR
; PPR
R; P
CREx
tract
ion
from
do
cum
ents
;Cu
mul
ative
his
togr
am
with
tren
d
Num
ber o
f co-
partn
ers
Tim
e se
ries
CSP;
PAR
; PPR
R; P
CREx
tract
ion
from
do
cum
ents
;Cu
rves
Prop
ortio
n of
lend
ing
and
non-
lend
ing
oper
atio
ns w
ith th
e pr
ivate
sec
tor i
n th
e po
rtfol
io (%
)
Num
ber o
f ope
ratio
ns
with
priv
ate
sect
orCS
P; P
AR; P
PRR
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts;
Curv
es
Fina
ncia
l im
porta
nce
of le
ndin
g an
d no
n-le
ndin
g op
erat
ions
w
ith th
e pr
ivate
sec
tor
in th
e po
rtfol
io (%
)
Num
ber o
f ope
ratio
ns
in th
e ac
tive
portf
olio
ov
er th
e pe
riod
CSP;
PPR
REx
tract
ion
from
do
cum
ents
;Hi
stog
ram
b. U
nder
scor
e th
e Ba
nk's
role
in th
e su
cces
s of
ope
ratio
ns
in S
eneg
al, p
artic
ular
ly by
impr
oved
m
onito
ring-
eval
uatio
n
a. %
of p
roje
cts
whi
ch
are
com
plia
nt in
term
s of
the
frequ
ency
of
supe
rvis
ion
mis
sion
s
Amou
nt o
f ope
ratio
ns
with
the
priva
te s
ecto
r in
the
activ
e po
rtfol
io
over
the
perio
d
CSP;
PAR
; PPR
REx
tract
ion
from
do
cum
ents
;Cu
rves
Amou
nt o
f cou
ntry
's
activ
e po
rtfol
ioCS
P; P
AR; P
PRR;
PCR
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts;
Cum
ulat
ive h
isto
gram
w
ith tr
end
b. %
of p
roje
cts
revie
wed
(at m
id-t
erm
or
at c
ompl
etio
n),
join
tly w
ith th
e Go
vern
men
t
Num
ber o
f pro
ject
s th
at h
ave
subm
itted
qu
arte
rly re
ports
on
time
Quar
terly
repo
rts;
BTOR
of s
uper
visio
n m
issi
ons;
PCR
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts;
Curv
es
Tota
l num
ber i
n th
e po
rtfol
io o
ver t
he
perio
d
CSP;
PAR
; PCR
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts;
Curv
es
Num
ber o
f eva
luat
ed
proj
ects
PPRR
; PCR
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts;
Curv
es
61Annexes
An ID
EV C
ount
ry S
trat
egy
Eval
uatio
n
Eval
uatio
n Cr
iteria
Spec
ific
Ques
tions
fo
r Sen
egal
Met
hodo
logi
cal
Appr
oach
Mai
n In
dica
tors
Nece
ssar
y Da
taDa
ta S
ourc
esDa
ta C
olle
ctio
n M
etho
dsDa
ta A
naly
sis
Met
hods
Bank
's
Inst
itutio
nal
Perfo
rman
ce
16. T
o w
hat e
xten
t ha
ve th
e Ba
nk's
kn
owle
dge
prod
ucts
in
fluen
ced
the
desi
gn
of th
e CS
P an
d op
erat
ions
and
thei
r im
plem
enta
tion?
a. R
evie
w th
e bi
blio
grap
hies
in
ex-a
nte
eval
uatio
n do
cum
ents
on
proj
ects
in
Sen
egal
and
cou
nt
the
num
ber o
f spe
cific
st
udie
s or
oth
er B
ank
know
ledg
e pr
oduc
ts
men
tione
d as
sou
rce
docu
men
ts.
b. In
terv
iew
the
acto
rs in
volve
d in
the
desi
gn o
f CSP
s an
d op
erat
ions
con
cern
ed
by th
e ev
alua
tion
Num
ber o
f inf
orm
atio
n se
ssio
ns o
rgan
ized
by
the
Bank
, inc
ludi
ng
radi
o an
d te
levis
ion
broa
dcas
ts
PPRR
; PCR
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts;
disc
ussi
ons
with
co
untry
team
Curv
es/H
isto
gram
Num
ber o
f pub
licat
ions
di
ssem
inat
ed b
y th
e Ba
nk, i
nclu
ding
leafl
ets
PPRR
; PCR
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts;
disc
ussi
ons
with
co
untry
team
Curv
es/H
isto
gram
Coun
t the
num
ber o
f se
ssio
ns o
rgan
ized
or p
ublic
atio
ns
diss
emin
ated
by
the
Bank
to s
hare
its
expe
rienc
e in
the
coun
try
Num
ber o
f ad
verti
sem
ents
in
loca
l new
spap
ers
and
mag
azin
es
Disc
ussi
ons
with
co
untry
team
Curv
es/H
isto
gram
Num
ber o
f vis
itors
to
the
Regi
onal
Offi
ce
libra
ry
SNFO
regi
ster
Curv
es/H
isto
gram
18. T
o w
hat e
xten
t ha
s th
e Ba
nk b
uilt
the
capa
citie
s an
d st
reng
then
ed th
e le
ader
ship
of t
he
gove
rnm
ent?
Num
ber o
f tec
hnic
al
capa
city
bui
ldin
g tra
inin
g se
ssio
ns
orga
nize
d
PCR;
Sup
ervis
ion
mis
sion
BTO
R; P
PRR
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts;
Curv
es/H
isto
gram
Num
ber o
f Go
vern
men
t pa
rtici
pant
s, in
clud
ing
the
num
ber o
f Di
rect
ors
and
Min
iste
rs
Repo
rtsEx
tract
ion
from
do
cum
ents
;Cu
rves
/His
togr
am
62 Senegal: Evaluation of the Bank's Country Strategy and Program 2004–2013 Summary Report
Eval
uatio
n Cr
iteria
Spec
ific
Ques
tions
fo
r Sen
egal
Met
hodo
logi
cal
Appr
oach
Mai
n In
dica
tors
Nece
ssar
y Da
taDa
ta S
ourc
esDa
ta C
olle
ctio
n M
etho
dsDa
ta A
naly
sis
Met
hods
Bank
's
Inst
itutio
nal
Perfo
rman
ce
19. T
o w
hat e
xten
t ha
s th
e Ba
nk
succ
essf
ully
iden
tified
an
d pr
omot
ed th
e ad
optio
n of
inno
vativ
e im
plem
enta
tion
prac
tices
and
m
echa
nism
s?
Iden
tify
inno
vatio
ns
prop
osed
by
the
Bank
in
the
coun
try.
Exis
tenc
e of
inno
vativ
e Ba
nk p
ract
ices
or
mec
hani
sms
Freq
uenc
yCS
P; P
AR; P
CR;
Coun
try T
eam
Disc
ussi
ons;
ext
ract
ion
from
doc
umen
tatio
nFr
eque
ncy
anal
ysis
; Hi
stog
ram
20. W
hat r
espo
nses
ha
s th
e Ba
nk p
rovid
ed
to c
hang
es in
dem
and,
co
mpe
titio
n an
d do
nors
?
Iden
tify
adap
tatio
ns
desi
gned
and
im
plem
ente
d by
the
Bank
in S
eneg
al to
ad
dres
s ch
ange
s in
th
e co
mm
unity
of
deve
lopm
ent p
artn
ers
Exis
tenc
e of
ada
ptat
ion
mea
sure
sFr
eque
ncy
CSP;
PPR
R; P
CR;
Coun
try T
eam
Disc
ussi
ons;
ext
ract
ion
from
doc
umen
tatio
nFr
eque
ncy
anal
ysis
; Hi
stog
ram
21. T
o w
hat e
xten
t ha
s th
e Ba
nk b
een
succ
essf
ul in
the
iden
tifica
tion,
co
mm
unic
atio
n an
d ad
optio
n of
bes
t pr
actic
es a
nd le
sson
s le
arne
d fro
m it
s ex
perie
nce?
?
22. T
o w
hat e
xten
t has
th
e Ba
nk c
ontri
bute
d to
stre
ngth
enin
g th
e re
sults
-bas
ed
man
agem
ent s
yste
m
in S
eneg
al?
Prop
ortio
n of
su
perv
isio
n m
issi
ons
carri
ed o
ut jo
intly
with
th
e Go
vern
men
t
Num
ber o
f joi
nt
mis
sion
s un
derta
ken
PCR;
PPR
REx
tract
ion
from
do
cum
enta
tion
Curv
es
Tota
l num
ber o
f su
perv
isio
n m
issi
ons
unde
rtake
n du
ring
the
perio
d
PCR;
PPR
REx
tract
ion
from
do
cum
enta
tion
Curv
es
63Annexes
An ID
EV C
ount
ry S
trat
egy
Eval
uatio
n
Gove
rnm
ent P
erfo
rman
ceEv
alua
tion
Crite
riaSp
ecifi
c Qu
estio
ns
for S
eneg
alM
etho
dolo
gica
l Ap
proa
chM
ain
Indi
cato
rsNe
cess
ary
Data
Data
Sou
rces
Data
Col
lect
ion
Met
hods
Data
Ana
lysi
s M
etho
dsGo
vern
men
t of
Sen
egal
's
Perfo
rman
ce
23. W
hat i
s th
e pe
rform
ance
of t
he
coun
try's
gov
ernm
ent
as a
dev
elop
men
t pa
rtner
s in
the
desi
gn,
impl
emen
tatio
n an
d m
anag
emen
t of
resu
lts?
Use
CPIA
ratin
gs fo
r th
e co
untry
Coun
try p
erfo
rman
ce
note
(CPI
A di
men
sion
s)CP
IA 2
004-
2013
; De
velo
pmen
t Ef
fect
ivene
ss R
epor
ts
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
tatio
nCu
rves
/His
togr
ams
Desc
ribe
the
role
of
the
Gove
rnm
ent
of S
eneg
al in
the
succ
ess
of o
pera
tions
, es
peci
ally
thro
ugh
impr
oved
mon
itorin
g-ev
alua
tion
a. F
requ
ency
of
Gov
ernm
ent
supe
rvis
ion
mis
sion
s
Tim
e se
ries
PCR
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
tatio
nHi
stog
ram
s/Cu
rves
b. %
of p
roje
cts
with
up
date
d IP
RRs
Tim
e se
ries
PPRR
; PCR
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
tatio
nCu
rves
c. %
of p
roje
cts
with
PP
P or
PP
ratin
gsTi
me
serie
sPP
RR; P
CREx
tract
ion
from
do
cum
enta
tion
Curv
es
d. %
of p
roje
cts
with
qua
rterly
sta
tus
repo
rts s
ubm
itted
late
or
not
sub
mitt
ed
Tim
e se
ries
PCR
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
tatio
nCu
rves
e. %
of p
roje
cts
revie
wed
(at m
id-t
erm
or
at c
ompl
etio
n),
join
tly w
ith th
e Ba
nk
Tim
e se
ries
PCR
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
tatio
nCu
rves
f. %
of p
roje
cts
with
gov
ernm
ent
supe
rvis
ion
mis
sion
s
Tim
e se
ries
PCR
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
tatio
nCu
rves
64 Senegal: Evaluation of the Bank's Country Strategy and Program 2004–2013 Summary Report
Eval
uatio
n Cr
iteria
Spec
ific
Ques
tions
fo
r Sen
egal
Met
hodo
logi
cal
Appr
oach
Mai
n In
dica
tors
Nece
ssar
y Da
taDa
ta S
ourc
esDa
ta C
olle
ctio
n M
etho
dsDa
ta A
naly
sis
Met
hods
Gove
rnm
ent
of S
eneg
al's
Pe
rform
ance
24. T
o w
hat e
xten
t do
es th
e Go
vern
men
t co
nsul
t the
oth
er C
SP
stak
ehol
ders
, inc
ludi
ng
the
priva
te s
ecto
r and
ci
vil s
ocie
ty?
Outli
ne th
e di
vers
ity
of th
e ac
tors
invo
lved
(NGO
s, tr
ade
unio
ns
etc.
)
Num
ber o
f spe
cific
Af
DB G
roup
co
nsul
tatio
n m
eetin
gs
Tim
e se
ries
Coun
try T
eam
; at
tend
ance
she
ets
Disc
ussi
ons;
Ext
ract
ion
from
doc
umen
tatio
nHi
stog
ram
Dive
rsity
of s
egm
ents
of
soc
iety
invo
lved
in d
ialo
gue
rela
ting
to th
e de
sign
and
im
plem
enta
tion
of th
e CS
P an
d op
erat
ions
co
ncer
ned
Freq
uenc
yCo
untry
Tea
m
and
gove
rnm
ent;
atte
ndan
ce s
heet
s
Disc
ussi
ons;
Ext
ract
ion
from
doc
umen
tatio
nFr
eque
ncy
anal
ysis
; Hi
stog
ram
s/se
ctor
s
25. T
o w
hat e
xten
t do
es th
e Go
vern
men
t pl
ay a
lead
ersh
ip ro
le
in a
id c
oord
inat
ion/
harm
oniza
tion?
Exam
ine
the
func
tioni
ng o
f a
poss
ible
join
t dec
isio
n-m
akin
g fra
mew
ork
for d
evel
opm
ent
assi
stan
ce in
the
coun
try
Exis
tenc
e of
a
join
t dec
isio
n-m
akin
g fra
mew
ork
for d
evel
opm
ent
assi
stan
ce
DCEF
Disc
ussi
ons
with
pa
rties
Natio
nalit
y of
th
e co
ordi
natio
n co
mm
ittee
cha
irper
son
DCEF
Disc
ussi
ons
with
the
parti
es
Mod
aliti
es fo
r de
term
inin
g m
eetin
g ag
enda
s
Stag
es a
nd a
ctor
sDC
EF; a
dmin
istra
tive
docu
men
tsDi
scus
sion
with
the
parti
es; e
xtra
ctio
n fro
m d
ocum
enta
tion
Tabl
e; fl
ow c
hart
Othe
r Crit
eria
26. W
hat f
acto
rs h
ave
favo
ured
or h
ampe
red
the
achi
evem
ent o
f the
ex
pect
ed o
utco
mes
of
the
Bank
's le
ndin
g an
d no
n-le
ndin
g op
erat
ions
?
Iden
tify
the
rele
vant
ex
plan
ator
y va
riabl
es
thro
ugh
proj
ect
docu
men
ts (C
SP,
appr
aisa
l rep
orts
, QP
AR, a
nnua
l rep
orts
, au
dit r
epor
ts, P
CR,
PCR-
EN, M
TR, e
tc.)
and
anal
yze
thei
r im
pact
on
oper
atio
nal
perfo
rman
ces
List
of f
avou
rabl
e fa
ctor
s; li
st o
f un
favo
urab
le fa
ctor
s
Freq
uenc
yDS
P; P
PRR;
PCR
; Co
untry
Tea
mDi
scus
sion
s; E
xtra
ctio
n fro
m d
ocum
enta
tion
Freq
uenc
y an
alys
is;
Hist
ogra
ms
65Annexes
An ID
EV C
ount
ry S
trat
egy
Eval
uatio
n
Effe
ctiv
enes
s of
Agr
icul
ture
Sec
tor a
nd R
ural
Dev
elop
men
t Pro
ject
sEv
alua
tion
Crite
riaSp
ecifi
c Qu
estio
ns
for S
eneg
alM
etho
dolo
gica
l Ap
proa
chM
ain
Indi
cato
rsNe
cess
ary
Data
Data
Sou
rces
Data
Col
lect
ion
Met
hods
Data
Ana
lysi
s M
etho
dsEf
fect
ivene
ss3.
In re
latio
n to
the
agre
ed o
utco
mes
in
the
diffe
rent
CSP
s w
hat w
ere
the
resu
lts
of th
e Ba
nk's
lend
ing
and
non-
lend
ing
oper
atio
ns in
Sen
egal
ov
er th
e 20
04-2
013
perio
d?
Com
bina
tion
of
met
hods
:(a
) Lis
t the
mai
n ou
tcom
es p
rese
nted
in
the
PCRs
, QPA
R an
d M
TR(b
) Ide
ntify
the
resu
lts
obta
ined
by
dire
ct
obse
rvat
ion
in th
e pr
ojec
t are
a;(c
) Ide
ntify
the
resu
lts
obta
ined
thro
ugh
sem
i-st
ruct
ured
dis
cuss
ions
w
ith th
e be
nefic
iarie
s an
d ot
her s
take
hold
ers
(d) C
ompa
re th
e ex
pect
ed a
nd a
ctua
l ou
tcom
es
3a. %
of d
istri
cts
affe
cted
(reg
ions
, De
partm
ents
, m
unic
ipal
ities
, ar
rond
isse
men
ts)
Num
ber o
f dis
trict
s ta
rget
ed;
Proj
ect d
ocum
ents
(a
ppra
isal
repo
rts,
IPRR
, MTR
, PCR
);
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts
Benc
hmar
king
with
ot
her s
ecto
r pro
ject
s
Num
ber o
f dis
trict
s co
vere
dId
emId
emBe
nchm
arki
ng w
ith
othe
r sec
tor p
roje
cts
3b. N
umbe
r of
hous
ehol
ds/p
eopl
e co
vere
d
IPRR
, MTR
, PCR
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts
Benc
hmar
king
with
ot
her s
ecto
r pro
ject
s
3c. %
of r
esul
ts
achi
eved
List
of r
esul
ts a
nd
base
line
leve
ls
Proj
ect d
ocum
ents
(a
ppra
isal
repo
rts,
IPRR
, MTR
, PCR
); pa
rties
con
cern
ed
(targ
et g
roup
s,
expe
rts)
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts; q
uick
su
rvey
(sem
i-st
ruct
ured
dis
cuss
ions
) w
ith s
take
hold
ers
Desc
riptio
n
No, o
f res
ults
par
tially
ac
hiev
edPC
R; p
artie
s co
ncer
ned
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts; q
uick
su
rvey
(sem
i-st
ruct
ured
dis
cuss
ions
) w
ith s
take
hold
ers
Freq
uenc
y an
alys
is;
clas
sific
atio
n;
Hist
ogra
m
No, o
f res
ults
fully
ac
hiev
edPC
R; p
artie
s co
ncer
ned
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts; q
uick
su
rvey
(sem
i-st
ruct
ured
dis
cuss
ions
) w
ith s
take
hold
ers
Freq
uenc
y an
alys
is;
clas
sific
atio
n;
Hist
ogra
m
66 Senegal: Evaluation of the Bank's Country Strategy and Program 2004–2013 Summary Report
Eval
uatio
n Cr
iteria
Spec
ific
Ques
tions
fo
r Sen
egal
Met
hodo
logi
cal
Appr
oach
Mai
n In
dica
tors
Nece
ssar
y Da
taDa
ta S
ourc
esDa
ta C
olle
ctio
n M
etho
dsDa
ta A
naly
sis
Met
hods
Effe
ctive
ness
3.In
rela
tion
to th
e ag
reed
out
com
es in
th
e di
ffere
nt C
SPs
wha
t wer
e th
e re
sults
of
the
Bank
's le
ndin
g an
d no
n-le
ndin
g op
erat
ions
in S
eneg
al
over
the
2004
-201
3 pe
riod?
Com
bina
tion
of
met
hods
:(a
) Lis
t the
mai
n ou
tcom
es p
rese
nted
in
the
PCRs
, QPA
R an
d M
TR(b
) Ide
ntify
the
resu
lts
obta
ined
by
dire
ct
obse
rvat
ion
in th
e pr
ojec
t are
a;(c
) Ide
ntify
the
resu
lts
obta
ined
thro
ugh
sem
i-st
ruct
ured
dis
cuss
ions
w
ith th
e be
nefic
iarie
s an
d ot
her s
take
hold
ers
(d) C
ompa
re th
e ex
pect
ed a
nd a
ctua
l ou
tcom
es
Leve
l of O
utpu
ts3d
. Ton
nes
of c
rops
co
ncer
ned
prod
uced
Proj
ect d
ocum
ents
(a
ppra
isal
repo
rts,
IPRR
, MTR
, PCR
); pa
rties
con
cern
ed
(ben
efici
arie
s, e
xper
ts);
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
tsHi
stog
ram
s/Cu
rves
3e. A
gric
ultu
ral y
ield
s (to
nnes
/ha)
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts; q
uick
su
rvey
(sem
i-st
ruct
ured
dis
cuss
ions
) w
ith s
take
hold
ers
Hist
ogra
ms/
Curv
es
3f. H
ecta
res
of
irrig
ated
land
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
tsHi
stog
ram
s/Cu
rves
3g. %
of p
ost-
harv
est
loss
esHa
rves
ted
tonn
age;
Ex
tract
ion
from
do
cum
ents
Hist
ogra
ms/
Curv
es
tonn
es o
f har
vest
lost
(p
est a
ttack
s, e
tc.)
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
tsHi
stog
ram
s/Cu
rves
3h. %
of r
ural
farm
ers
usin
g m
oder
n in
puts
No. o
f far
mer
s in
the
targ
et a
reas
;Ex
tract
ion
from
do
cum
ents
Hist
ogra
ms/
Curv
es
No. o
f far
mer
s af
fect
ed
by th
e pr
ojec
ts;
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
tsHi
stog
ram
s/Cu
rves
No. o
f far
mer
s us
ing
mod
ern
inpu
tsEx
tract
ion
from
do
cum
ents
Hist
ogra
ms/
Curv
es
3i. P
ropo
rtion
of
irrig
ated
land
Irrig
ated
are
asEx
tract
ion
from
do
cum
ents
Hist
ogra
ms/
Curv
es
3j. N
umbe
r of
prod
uctio
n an
d/or
m
arke
ting
faci
litie
s co
nstru
cted
or
reha
bilit
ated
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
tsHi
stog
ram
s/Cu
rves
67Annexes
An ID
EV C
ount
ry S
trat
egy
Eval
uatio
n
Eval
uatio
n Cr
iteria
Spec
ific
Ques
tions
fo
r Sen
egal
Met
hodo
logi
cal
Appr
oach
Mai
n In
dica
tors
Nece
ssar
y Da
taDa
ta S
ourc
esDa
ta C
olle
ctio
n M
etho
dsDa
ta A
naly
sis
Met
hods
Effe
ctive
ness
3.In
rela
tion
to th
e ag
reed
out
com
es in
th
e di
ffere
nt C
SPs
wha
t wer
e th
e re
sults
of
the
Bank
's le
ndin
g an
d no
n-le
ndin
g op
erat
ions
in S
eneg
al
over
the
2004
-201
3 pe
riod?
Com
bina
tion
of
met
hods
:(a
) Lis
t the
mai
n ou
tcom
es p
rese
nted
in
the
PCRs
, QPA
R an
d M
TR(b
) Ide
ntify
the
resu
lts
obta
ined
by
dire
ct
obse
rvat
ion
in th
e pr
ojec
t are
a;(c
) Ide
ntify
the
resu
lts
obta
ined
thro
ugh
sem
i-st
ruct
ured
dis
cuss
ions
w
ith th
e be
nefic
iarie
s an
d ot
her s
take
hold
ers
(d) C
ompa
re th
e ex
pect
ed a
nd a
ctua
l ou
tcom
es
3k. I
rriga
ble
land
ar
ea d
evel
oped
or
reha
bilit
ated
Proj
ect d
ocum
ents
(a
ppra
isal
repo
rts,
IPRR
, MTR
, PCR
); pa
rties
con
cern
ed
(ben
efici
arie
s, e
xper
ts);
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
tsHi
stog
ram
s/Cu
rves
3l. N
umbe
r of c
attle
va
ccin
ated
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
tsHi
stog
ram
s/Cu
rves
3m. N
umbe
r of
seed
lings
and
/or
impr
oved
see
d di
strib
uted
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
tsHi
stog
ram
s/Cu
rves
3n. T
onne
s of
ferti
lizer
di
strib
uted
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
tsHi
stog
ram
s/Cu
rves
3o. N
umbe
r of
com
mun
ity-b
ased
pr
ojec
ts im
plem
ente
d
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
tsHi
stog
ram
s/Cu
rves
3p. N
umbe
r of f
arm
ers
train
ed in
mod
ern
tech
niqu
es
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
tsHi
stog
ram
s/Cu
rves
3q. N
umbe
r of r
ural
dw
elle
rs tr
aine
dEx
tract
ion
from
do
cum
ents
Hist
ogra
ms/
Curv
es
Note
: The
defi
nitio
n an
d ch
oice
of i
ndic
ator
s dr
aws
on th
e GD
PRD
appr
oach
(200
8:23
) whi
ch is
focu
sed
on s
ervic
e de
liver
y. It
cons
ider
s th
at m
ost p
roje
cts
have
one
thin
g in
com
mon
: the
y ar
e es
sent
ially
veh
icle
s fo
r mak
ing
a pr
oduc
t or p
rodu
cts
avai
labl
e to
a ta
rget
pop
ulat
ion.
The
con
cept
of t
he “p
rodu
ct” i
s a
broa
d on
e, w
hich
may
incl
ude:
a ta
ngib
le p
rodu
ct s
uch
as a
loan
, a ru
ral r
oad,
or a
pac
kage
of t
echn
olog
ical
inno
vatio
ns fo
r inc
reas
ing
yield
s; a
ser
vice,
suc
h as
an
exte
nsio
n pr
ogra
m, l
ocal
hea
lth c
are,
or l
and
regi
stry
ser
vice;
som
ethi
ng m
ore
abst
ract
, suc
h as
“an
enab
ling
envir
onm
ent”
or a
“com
mun
ity
deve
lopm
ent p
roje
ct”.
For
the
proj
ect o
r pro
gram
to a
chie
ve it
s de
sire
d go
al, n
ot o
nly
mus
t the
pro
duct
be
som
ethi
ng th
at th
e ta
rget
pop
ulat
ion
wan
ts a
nd n
eeds
, but
the
deliv
ery
syst
em m
ust e
nsur
e th
at th
ey g
et it
. Fr
om th
e CE
DR q
uest
ions
it is
it is
then
pos
sibl
e to
gen
erat
e th
ree
basi
c in
dica
tors
: Acc
ess
– pe
rcen
tage
of t
he ta
rget
pop
ulat
ion
havin
g ac
cess
to th
e pr
ojec
t pro
duct
. Th
e te
rm “a
cces
s” h
as to
be
clea
rly d
efine
d. It
may
be
“tim
e ta
ken
to re
ach”
or “
dist
ance
” or p
ossi
bly
“abi
lity
to p
ay”.
Use
– pe
rcen
tage
of t
he ta
rget
pop
ulat
ion
that
use
s th
e pr
ojec
t pro
duct
. Si
mila
rly, t
he te
rm “u
se” h
as to
be
defin
ed. I
t co
uld
for i
nsta
nce
be “a
dopt
ion”
as
in “p
erce
nt o
f sm
allh
olde
rs a
dopt
ing
a pr
actic
e re
com
men
ded
by e
xten
sion
”. S
atis
fact
ion
– pe
rcen
tage
of u
sers
sat
isfie
d w
ith th
e pr
oduc
t. T
he m
easu
rem
ent o
f sat
isfa
ctio
n re
quire
s th
e co
nduc
t of a
wid
e su
rvey
. Give
n th
e CE
DR's
ope
ratio
nal c
onst
rain
ts, t
his
type
of s
urve
y is
no
t a p
ossi
ble
optio
n. C
onse
quen
tly, t
he a
cces
s an
d us
e in
dica
tors
wer
e re
tain
ed fo
r the
eva
luat
ion
fram
ewor
k fo
r the
Ban
k's
stra
tegi
es a
nd p
rogr
ams
in S
eneg
al.
Glob
al D
onor
Pla
tform
for R
ural
Dev
elop
men
t, GD
PRD,
FAO
and
Wor
ld B
ank,
200
8. T
rack
ing
resu
lts in
agr
icul
ture
and
rura
l dev
elop
men
t in
less
-tha
n-id
eal c
ondi
tions
: A s
ourc
eboo
k of
indi
cato
rs fo
r mon
itorin
g an
d ev
alua
tion.
ISBN
978
-92-
5-10
6082
-7, p
age
23.
68 Senegal: Evaluation of the Bank's Country Strategy and Program 2004–2013 Summary Report
Eval
uatio
n Cr
iteria
Spec
ific
Ques
tions
fo
r Sen
egal
Met
hodo
logi
cal
Appr
oach
Mai
n In
dica
tors
Nece
ssar
y Da
taDa
ta S
ourc
esDa
ta C
olle
ctio
n M
etho
dsDa
ta A
naly
sis
Met
hods
Effe
ctive
ness
3.In
rela
tion
to th
e ag
reed
out
com
es in
th
e di
ffere
nt C
SPs
wha
t wer
e th
e re
sults
of
the
Bank
's le
ndin
g an
d no
n-le
ndin
g op
erat
ions
in S
eneg
al
over
the
2004
-201
3 pe
riod?
Com
bina
tion
of
met
hods
:(a
) Lis
t the
mai
n ou
tcom
es p
rese
nted
in
the
PCRs
, QPA
R an
d M
TR(b
) Ide
ntify
the
resu
lts
obta
ined
by
dire
ct
obse
rvat
ion
in th
e pr
ojec
t are
a;(c
) Ide
ntify
the
resu
lts
obta
ined
thro
ugh
sem
i-st
ruct
ured
dis
cuss
ions
w
ith th
e be
nefic
iarie
s an
d ot
her s
take
hold
ers
(d) C
ompa
re th
e ex
pect
ed a
nd a
ctua
l ou
tcom
es
Outc
ome
Leve
l3r
. Am
ount
of
agric
ultu
ral s
ubsi
dies
(X
OF)
Deve
lopm
ent
Coop
erat
ion
Repo
rt;
AfDB
and
Wor
ld B
ank
stat
istic
s po
rtals
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts; q
uick
su
rvey
(sem
i-st
ruct
ured
dis
cuss
ions
) w
ith s
take
hold
ers
Hist
ogra
ms/
Curv
es
3s. P
ropo
rtion
of a
id
allo
cate
d to
agr
icul
ture
an
d ru
ral d
evel
opm
ent
(%)
DCEF
Rep
ort
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts; q
uick
su
rvey
(sem
i-st
ruct
ured
dis
cuss
ions
) w
ith s
take
hold
ers
Hist
ogra
ms/
Curv
es
3t. A
gric
ultu
ral
prod
uctio
n gr
owth
ra
te (%
)
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts; q
uick
su
rvey
(sem
i-st
ruct
ured
dis
cuss
ions
) w
ith s
take
hold
ers
Hist
ogra
ms/
Curv
es
3u. F
ood
prod
uctio
n gr
owth
rate
(%)
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts; q
uick
su
rvey
(sem
i-st
ruct
ured
dis
cuss
ions
) w
ith s
take
hold
ers
Hist
ogra
ms/
Curv
es
3v. N
umbe
r of d
irect
ru
ral j
obs
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts; q
uick
su
rvey
(sem
i-st
ruct
ured
dis
cuss
ions
) w
ith s
take
hold
ers
Hist
ogra
ms/
Curv
es
3w. A
vera
ge g
row
th
rate
of t
arge
t ag
ricul
tura
l cro
p yie
lds
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts; q
uick
su
rvey
(sem
i-st
ruct
ured
dis
cuss
ions
) w
ith s
take
hold
ers
Hist
ogra
ms/
Curv
es
3x. A
nnua
l vol
ume
of in
vest
men
ts in
ag
ricul
ture
ove
r the
pe
riod
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts; q
uick
su
rvey
(sem
i-st
ruct
ured
dis
cuss
ions
) w
ith s
take
hold
ers
Hist
ogra
ms/
Curv
es
69Annexes
An ID
EV C
ount
ry S
trat
egy
Eval
uatio
n
Effe
ctiv
enes
s of
Soc
ial D
evel
opm
ent P
roje
cts
Eval
uatio
n Cr
iteria
Spec
ific
Ques
tions
fo
r Sen
egal
Met
hodo
logi
cal
Appr
oach
Mai
n In
dica
tors
Nece
ssar
y Da
taDa
ta S
ourc
esDa
ta C
olle
ctio
n M
etho
dsDa
ta A
naly
sis
Met
hods
Effe
ctive
ness
In re
latio
n to
the
agre
ed u
pon
outc
omes
in
the
diffe
rent
CSP
s w
hat w
ere
the
resu
lts
of th
e Ba
nk's
lend
ing
and
non-
lend
ing
oper
atio
ns in
Sen
egal
ov
er th
e 20
04-2
013
perio
d?
Com
bina
tion
of
met
hods
:(a
) Lis
t the
mai
n ou
tcom
es p
rese
nted
in
the
PCRs
, QPA
R an
d M
TR(b
) Ide
ntify
the
resu
lts
obta
ined
by
dire
ct
obse
rvat
ion
in th
e pr
ojec
t are
a;(c
) Ide
ntify
the
resu
lts
obta
ined
thro
ugh
sem
i-st
ruct
ured
dis
cuss
ions
w
ith th
e be
nefic
iarie
s an
d ot
her s
take
hold
ers
(d) C
ompa
re th
e ex
pect
ed a
nd a
ctua
l ou
tcom
es
3a. %
of d
istri
cts
affe
cted
(reg
ions
, De
partm
ents
, m
unic
ipal
ities
, ar
rond
isse
men
ts)
No. o
f dis
trict
s ta
rget
ed;
Proj
ect d
ocum
ents
(a
ppra
isal
repo
rts,
IPRR
, MTR
, PCR
);
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts
Benc
hmar
king
with
ot
her s
ecto
r pro
ject
s
No. o
f dis
trict
s af
fect
edId
emid
emBe
nchm
arki
ng w
ith
othe
r sec
tor p
roje
cts
3b. N
umbe
r of
hous
ehol
ds/p
eopl
e co
vere
d
IPRR
, MTR
, PCR
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts
Benc
hmar
king
with
ot
her s
ecto
r pro
ject
s
3c. %
of r
esul
ts
achi
eved
List
of r
esul
ts a
nd
base
line
leve
lsPr
ojec
t doc
umen
ts
(app
rais
al re
ports
, IP
RR, M
TR, P
CR);
parti
es c
once
rned
(ta
rget
gro
ups,
ex
perts
)
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts; q
uick
su
rvey
(sem
i-st
ruct
ured
dis
cuss
ions
) w
ith s
take
hold
ers
Desc
riptio
n
No. o
f res
ults
par
tly
achi
eved
PCR;
par
ties
conc
erne
did
emFr
eque
ncy
anal
ysis
; cl
assi
ficat
ion;
Hi
stog
ram
No. o
f res
ults
fully
ac
hiev
edPC
R; p
artie
s co
ncer
ned
idem
Freq
uenc
y an
alys
is
clas
sific
atio
n;
Hist
ogra
m
Outp
ut L
evel
Num
ber o
f new
sch
ool
enro
lmen
tsPr
ojec
t doc
umen
ts
(IPRR
, MTR
, PCR
); na
tiona
l sec
tor s
tudi
es;
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts;
Hist
ogra
ms/
Curv
es
Num
ber o
f tea
cher
s an
d su
ppor
t tea
cher
s re
crui
ted
Proj
ect d
ocum
ents
(IP
RR, M
TR, P
CR);
natio
nal s
ecto
r stu
dies
;
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts;
Hi
stog
ram
s/Cu
rves
3t. N
umbe
r of h
ealth
ce
ntre
s (m
edic
al
cove
rage
)
Proj
ect d
ocum
ents
(IP
RR, M
TR, P
CR);
natio
nal s
ecto
r stu
dies
;
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts;
Hist
ogra
ms/
Curv
es
Num
ber o
f hea
lth
cent
res
cons
truct
ed o
r re
habi
litat
ed
Proj
ect d
ocum
ents
(IP
RR, M
TR, P
CR);
natio
nal s
ecto
r stu
dies
;
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts;
Hist
ogra
ms/
Curv
es
70 Senegal: Evaluation of the Bank's Country Strategy and Program 2004–2013 Summary Report
Eval
uatio
n Cr
iteria
Spec
ific
Ques
tions
fo
r Sen
egal
Met
hodo
logi
cal
Appr
oach
Mai
n In
dica
tors
Nece
ssar
y Da
taDa
ta S
ourc
esDa
ta C
olle
ctio
n M
etho
dsDa
ta A
naly
sis
Met
hods
Effe
ctive
ness
In re
latio
n to
the
agre
ed u
pon
outc
omes
in
the
diffe
rent
CSP
s w
hat w
ere
the
resu
lts
of th
e Ba
nk's
lend
ing
and
non-
lend
ing
oper
atio
ns in
Sen
egal
ov
er th
e 20
04-2
013
perio
d?
Com
bina
tion
of
met
hods
:(a
) Lis
t the
mai
n ou
tcom
es p
rese
nted
in
the
PCRs
, QPA
R an
d M
TR(b
) Ide
ntify
the
resu
lts
obta
ined
by
dire
ct
obse
rvat
ion
in th
e pr
ojec
t are
a;(c
) Ide
ntify
the
resu
lts
obta
ined
thro
ugh
sem
i-st
ruct
ured
dis
cuss
ions
w
ith th
e be
nefic
iarie
s an
d ot
her s
take
hold
ers
(d) C
ompa
re th
e ex
pect
ed a
nd a
ctua
l ou
tcom
es
Outp
ut L
evel
Num
ber o
f equ
ippe
d he
alth
cen
tres
Proj
ect d
ocum
ents
(IP
RR, M
TR, P
CR);
natio
nal s
ecto
r stu
dies
;
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts;
Hi
stog
ram
s/Cu
rves
Num
ber o
f hea
lth
pers
onne
l tra
ined
Proj
ect d
ocum
ents
(IP
RR, M
TR, P
CR);
natio
nal s
ecto
r stu
dies
;
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts;
Hi
stog
ram
s/Cu
rves
Num
ber o
f hea
lth
pers
onne
l tra
inin
g se
ssio
ns
Proj
ect d
ocum
ents
(IP
RR, M
TR, P
CR);
natio
nal s
ecto
r stu
dies
;
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts;
Hi
stog
ram
s/Cu
rves
% o
f peo
ple
with
ac
cess
to a
hea
lth
cent
re
Proj
ect d
ocum
ents
(IP
RR, M
TR, P
CR);
natio
nal s
ecto
r stu
dies
;
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts;
Hi
stog
ram
s/Cu
rves
3r. N
umbe
r of
clas
sroo
ms/
scho
ols
cons
truct
ed o
r re
habi
litat
ed
Proj
ect d
ocum
ents
(IP
RR, M
TR, P
CR);
natio
nal s
ecto
r stu
dies
;
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts;
Hi
stog
ram
s/Cu
rves
Num
ber o
f sch
ool t
ext
book
s pr
ovid
edPr
ojec
t doc
umen
ts
(IPRR
, MTR
, PCR
); na
tiona
l sec
tor s
tudi
es;
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts;
Hi
stog
ram
s/Cu
rves
Outp
ut L
evel
3s. E
nrol
men
t Rat
ePr
ojec
t doc
umen
ts
(IPRR
, MTR
, PCR
); na
tiona
l sec
tor s
tudi
es;
natio
nal s
take
hold
ers
(exp
erts
, Min
istry
of
Road
s); A
fDB
and
Wor
ld B
ank
stat
istic
s po
rtals
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts;
Hi
stog
ram
s/Cu
rves
71Annexes
An ID
EV C
ount
ry S
trat
egy
Eval
uatio
n
Effe
ctiv
enes
s of
Wat
er a
nd S
anita
tion
Sect
or P
roje
cts
Eval
uatio
n Cr
iteria
Spec
ific
Ques
tions
fo
r Sen
egal
Met
hodo
logi
cal
Appr
oach
Mai
n In
dica
tors
Nece
ssar
y Da
taDa
ta S
ourc
esDa
ta C
olle
ctio
n M
etho
dsDa
ta A
naly
sis
Met
hods
Effe
ctive
ness
In re
latio
n to
the
agre
ed u
pon
outc
omes
in
the
diffe
rent
CSP
s w
hat w
ere
the
resu
lts
of th
e Ba
nk's
lend
ing
and
non-
lend
ing
oper
atio
ns in
Sen
egal
ov
er th
e 20
04-2
013
perio
d?
Com
bina
tion
of
met
hods
:(a
) Lis
t the
mai
n ou
tcom
es p
rese
nted
in
the
PCRs
, QPA
R an
d M
TR(b
) Ide
ntify
the
resu
lts
obta
ined
by
dire
ct
obse
rvat
ion
in th
e pr
ojec
t are
a;(c
) Ide
ntify
the
resu
lts
obta
ined
thro
ugh
sem
i-st
ruct
ured
dis
cuss
ions
w
ith th
e be
nefic
iarie
s an
d ot
her s
take
hold
ers
(d) C
ompa
re th
e ex
pect
ed a
nd a
ctua
l ou
tcom
es
3a. %
of d
istri
cts
affe
cted
(reg
ions
, De
partm
ents
, m
unic
ipal
ities
, ar
rond
isse
men
ts)
No. o
f dis
trict
s ta
rget
ed;
Proj
ect d
ocum
ents
(a
ppra
isal
repo
rts,
IPRR
, MTR
, PCR
)
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts
Benc
hmar
king
with
ot
her s
ecto
r pro
ject
s
No. o
f dis
trict
s af
fect
edPr
ojec
t doc
umen
ts
(app
rais
al re
ports
, IP
RR, M
TR, P
CR)
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts
Benc
hmar
king
with
ot
her s
ecto
r pro
ject
s
3b. N
umbe
r of
hous
ehol
ds/p
eopl
e co
vere
d
IPRR
, MTR
, PCR
3c. %
of r
esul
ts
achi
eved
List
of r
esul
ts a
nd
base
line
leve
lsPr
ojec
t doc
umen
ts
(app
rais
al re
ports
, IP
RR, M
TR, P
CR);
parti
es c
once
rned
(ta
rget
gro
ups,
ex
perts
)
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts; q
uick
su
rvey
(sem
i-st
ruct
ured
dis
cuss
ions
) w
ith s
take
hold
ers
Desc
riptio
n
No. o
f res
ults
par
tly
achi
eved
PCR;
par
ties
conc
erne
dEx
tract
ion
from
do
cum
ents
; qui
ck
surv
ey (s
emi-
stru
ctur
ed d
iscu
ssio
ns)
with
sta
keho
lder
s
Freq
uenc
y an
alys
is;
clas
sific
atio
n;
Hist
ogra
m
No. o
f res
ults
fully
ac
hiev
edPC
R; p
artie
s co
ncer
ned
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts; q
uick
su
rvey
(sem
i-st
ruct
ured
dis
cuss
ions
) w
ith s
take
hold
ers
Freq
uenc
y an
alys
is;
clas
sific
atio
n;
Hist
ogra
m
72 Senegal: Evaluation of the Bank's Country Strategy and Program 2004–2013 Summary Report
Eval
uatio
n Cr
iteria
Spec
ific
Ques
tions
fo
r Sen
egal
Met
hodo
logi
cal
Appr
oach
Mai
n In
dica
tors
Nece
ssar
y Da
taDa
ta S
ourc
esDa
ta C
olle
ctio
n M
etho
dsDa
ta A
naly
sis
Met
hods
Effe
ctive
ness
In re
latio
n to
the
agre
ed u
pon
outc
omes
in
the
diffe
rent
CSP
s w
hat w
ere
the
resu
lts
of th
e Ba
nk's
lend
ing
and
non-
lend
ing
oper
atio
ns in
Sen
egal
ov
er th
e 20
04-2
013
perio
d?
Com
bina
tion
of
met
hods
:(a
) Lis
t the
mai
n ou
tcom
es p
rese
nted
in
the
PCRs
, QPA
R an
d M
TR(b
) Ide
ntify
the
resu
lts
obta
ined
by
dire
ct
obse
rvat
ion
in th
e pr
ojec
t are
a;(c
) Ide
ntify
the
resu
lts
obta
ined
thro
ugh
sem
i-st
ruct
ured
dis
cuss
ions
w
ith th
e be
nefic
iarie
s an
d ot
her s
take
hold
ers
(d) C
ompa
re th
e ex
pect
ed a
nd a
ctua
l ou
tcom
es
Outp
ut L
evel
sNu
mbe
r of
wel
ls a
nd
bore
hole
s dr
illed
or
reha
bilit
ated
Tim
e se
ries
Proj
ect d
ocum
ents
(a
ppra
isal
repo
rts,
IPRR
, MTR
, PCR
); pa
rties
con
cern
ed
(farm
ers,
exp
erts
)
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
tsHi
stog
ram
s/Cu
rves
Leng
th o
f drin
king
w
ater
pip
ing
cons
truct
ed
Tim
e se
ries
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts
Hist
ogra
ms/
Curv
es
Drin
king
wat
er
prod
uctio
n in
stal
led
capa
city
(m3)
Tim
e se
ries
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts
Hist
ogra
ms/
Curv
es
Num
ber o
f lat
rines
co
nstru
cted
Tim
e se
ries
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts
Hist
ogra
ms/
Curv
es
Num
ber o
f peo
ple
train
ed in
wat
er
supp
ly in
frast
ruct
ure
mai
nten
ance
Tim
e se
ries
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts
Hist
ogra
ms/
Curv
es
3w. N
umbe
r of
dom
estic
drin
king
w
ater
con
nect
ions
Tim
e se
ries
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts
Hist
ogra
ms/
Curv
es
Outc
ome
Leve
ls3u
. % fe
mal
e in
habi
tant
s w
ith
acce
ss to
an
impr
oved
so
urce
of d
rinki
ng
wat
er
Tim
e se
ries
Proj
ect d
ocum
ents
(a
ppra
isal
repo
rts,
IPRR
, MTR
, PCR
); pa
rties
con
cern
ed
(farm
ers,
exp
erts
); Af
DB a
nd W
orld
Ban
k st
atis
tics
porta
ls
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts
Hist
ogra
ms/
Curv
es
3v. %
fem
ale
inha
bita
nts
with
ac
cess
to a
n im
prov
ed
sani
tatio
n sy
stem
Tim
e se
ries
idem
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts
Hist
ogra
ms/
Curv
es
73Annexes
An ID
EV C
ount
ry S
trat
egy
Eval
uatio
n
Effe
ctiv
enes
s of
Ene
rgy
Sect
or P
roje
cts
Eval
uatio
n Cr
iteria
Spec
ific
Ques
tions
fo
r Sen
egal
Met
hodo
logi
cal
Appr
oach
Mai
n In
dica
tors
Nece
ssar
y Da
taDa
ta S
ourc
esDa
ta C
olle
ctio
n M
etho
dsDa
ta A
naly
sis
Met
hods
Effe
ctive
ness
In re
latio
n to
the
agre
ed u
pon
outc
omes
in
the
diffe
rent
CSP
s w
hat w
ere
the
resu
lts
of th
e Ba
nk's
lend
ing
and
non-
lend
ing
oper
atio
ns in
Sen
egal
ov
er th
e 20
04-2
013
perio
d?
Com
bina
tion
of
met
hods
:(a
) Lis
t the
mai
n ou
tcom
es p
rese
nted
in
the
PCRs
, QPA
R an
d M
TR(b
) Ide
ntify
the
resu
lts
obta
ined
by
dire
ct
obse
rvat
ion
in th
e pr
ojec
t are
a;(c
) Ide
ntify
the
resu
lts
obta
ined
thro
ugh
sem
i-st
ruct
ured
dis
cuss
ions
w
ith th
e be
nefic
iarie
s an
d ot
her s
take
hold
ers
(d) C
ompa
re th
e ex
pect
ed a
nd a
ctua
l ou
tcom
es
3a. %
of d
istri
cts
affe
cted
(reg
ions
, De
partm
ents
, m
unic
ipal
ities
, ar
rond
isse
men
ts)
No. o
f dis
trict
s ta
rget
ed;
Proj
ect d
ocum
ents
(a
ppra
isal
repo
rts,
IPRR
, MTR
, PCR
);
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts
Benc
hmar
king
with
ot
her s
ecto
r pro
ject
s
No. o
f dis
trict
s af
fect
edId
emid
emBe
nchm
arki
ng w
ith
othe
r sec
tor p
roje
cts
3c. %
of r
esul
ts
achi
eved
Proj
ect d
ocum
ents
(a
ppra
isal
repo
rts,
IPRR
, MTR
, PCR
); pa
rties
con
cern
ed
(targ
et g
roup
s,
expe
rts);
DER
(201
3);
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts; q
uick
su
rvey
(sem
i-st
ruct
ured
dis
cuss
ions
) w
ith s
take
hold
ers
Freq
uenc
y an
alys
is:
Hist
ogra
ms
List
of r
esul
ts a
nd
base
line
leve
lsPC
Rid
emFr
eque
ncy
anal
ysis
: Hi
stog
ram
s
No. o
f res
ults
par
tly
achi
eved
PCR
idem
Freq
uenc
y an
alys
is:
Hist
ogra
ms
Outp
ut L
evel
sNu
mbe
r of e
mpl
oyee
s in
clud
ing
expa
triat
esPr
ojec
t doc
umen
ts
(app
rais
al re
ports
, IP
RR, M
TR, P
CR);
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts
Curv
es
Inst
alle
d el
ectri
c po
wer
ca
paci
ty (M
W)
Proj
ect d
ocum
ents
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts
Curv
es
Num
ber o
f per
sonn
el
train
ed in
mai
nten
ance
Proj
ect d
ocum
ents
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts
Curv
es
Leng
ths
of li
nes
co
nstru
cted
and
/or
reha
bilit
ated
(km
)
Proj
ect d
ocum
ents
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts
Curv
es
Num
ber o
f tra
nsfo
rmer
s in
stal
led
Proj
ect d
ocum
ents
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts
Curv
es
Annu
al n
umbe
r of
trans
form
er-r
elat
ed
inci
dent
s
Proj
ect d
ocum
ents
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts
Curv
es
Num
ber o
f dis
tribu
tion
sub-
stat
ions
inst
alle
dPr
ojec
t doc
umen
tsEx
tract
ion
from
do
cum
ents
Cu
rves
74 Senegal: Evaluation of the Bank's Country Strategy and Program 2004–2013 Summary Report
Eval
uatio
n Cr
iteria
Spec
ific
Ques
tions
fo
r Sen
egal
Met
hodo
logi
cal
Appr
oach
Mai
n In
dica
tors
Nece
ssar
y Da
taDa
ta S
ourc
esDa
ta C
olle
ctio
n M
etho
dsDa
ta A
naly
sis
Met
hods
Effe
ctive
ness
In re
latio
n to
the
agre
ed u
pon
outc
omes
in
the
diffe
rent
CSP
s w
hat w
ere
the
resu
lts
of th
e Ba
nk's
lend
ing
and
non-
lend
ing
oper
atio
ns in
Sen
egal
ov
er th
e 20
04-2
013
perio
d?
Com
bina
tion
of
met
hods
:(a
) Lis
t the
mai
n ou
tcom
es p
rese
nted
in
the
PCRs
, QPA
R an
d M
TR(b
) Ide
ntify
the
resu
lts
obta
ined
by
dire
ct
obse
rvat
ion
in th
e pr
ojec
t are
a;(c
) Ide
ntify
the
resu
lts
obta
ined
thro
ugh
sem
i-st
ruct
ured
dis
cuss
ions
w
ith th
e be
nefic
iarie
s an
d ot
her s
take
hold
ers
(d) C
ompa
re th
e ex
pect
ed a
nd a
ctua
l ou
tcom
es
Outp
ut L
evel
sNu
mbe
r of o
utag
es
per y
ear
Proj
ect d
ocum
ents
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts
Curv
es
Aver
age
outa
ge ti
me
Proj
ect d
ocum
ents
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts
Curv
es
Annu
al n
umbe
r of
days
with
out
ages
Proj
ect d
ocum
ents
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts
Curv
es
Cum
ulat
ive a
nnua
l ou
tage
tim
ePr
ojec
t doc
umen
tsEx
tract
ion
from
do
cum
ents
Cu
rves
Annu
al tu
rnov
erPr
ojec
t doc
umen
tsEx
tract
ion
from
do
cum
ents
Cu
rves
Annu
al tu
rnov
erPr
ojec
t doc
umen
tsEx
tract
ion
from
do
cum
ents
Cu
rves
Annu
al n
umbe
r of u
ser
clai
ms
Proj
ect d
ocum
ents
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts
Curv
es
Annu
al a
mou
nt o
f ta
xes
and
dutie
s pa
id
to c
entra
l gov
ernm
ent
Proj
ect d
ocum
ents
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts
Curv
es
Cum
ulat
ive a
mou
nt o
f ta
xes
and
dutie
s pa
id
to c
entra
l gov
ernm
ent
over
the
proj
ect p
erio
d
Proj
ect d
ocum
ents
Ex
tract
ion
from
do
cum
ents
Cu
rves
Aver
age
mon
thly/
annu
al h
ouse
hold
sp
endi
ng o
n el
ectri
city
Proj
ect d
ocum
ents
Ex
tract
ion
from
do
cum
ents
Cu
rves
Popu
latio
n su
pplie
d fro
m th
e el
ectri
c po
wer
grid
(inh
abs.
)
Proj
ect d
ocum
ents
id
em E
xtra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
tsCu
rves
Num
ber o
f rur
al
com
mun
ities
cov
ered
Proj
ect d
ocum
ents
Ex
tract
ion
from
do
cum
ents
Cu
rves
3z. Q
uant
ity o
f re
new
able
ene
rgy
gene
rate
d (M
w)
Proj
ect d
ocum
ents
Ex
tract
ion
from
do
cum
ents
Cu
rves
75Annexes
An ID
EV C
ount
ry S
trat
egy
Eval
uatio
n
Eval
uatio
n Cr
iteria
Spec
ific
Ques
tions
fo
r Sen
egal
Met
hodo
logi
cal
Appr
oach
Mai
n In
dica
tors
Nece
ssar
y Da
taDa
ta S
ourc
esDa
ta C
olle
ctio
n M
etho
dsDa
ta A
naly
sis
Met
hods
Effe
ctive
ness
In re
latio
n to
the
agre
ed u
pon
outc
omes
in
the
diffe
rent
CSP
s w
hat w
ere
the
resu
lts
of th
e Ba
nk's
lend
ing
and
non-
lend
ing
oper
atio
ns in
Sen
egal
ov
er th
e 20
04-2
013
perio
d?
Com
bina
tion
of
met
hods
:(a
) Lis
t the
mai
n ou
tcom
es p
rese
nted
in
the
PCRs
, QPA
R an
d M
TR(b
) Ide
ntify
the
resu
lts
obta
ined
by
dire
ct
obse
rvat
ion
in th
e pr
ojec
t are
a;(c
) Ide
ntify
the
resu
lts
obta
ined
thro
ugh
sem
i-st
ruct
ured
dis
cuss
ions
w
ith th
e be
nefic
iarie
s an
d ot
her s
take
hold
ers
(d) C
ompa
re th
e ex
pect
ed a
nd a
ctua
l ou
tcom
es
Outc
ome
Leve
lsCu
rves
Perc
enta
ge o
f en
ergy
con
sum
ed b
y bu
sine
sses
Proj
ect d
ocum
ents
Ex
tract
ion
from
do
cum
ents
Cu
rves
Num
ber o
f su
bscr
iber
s/ho
useh
olds
/bu
sine
sses
con
nect
ed
to th
e el
ectri
city
grid
Proj
ect d
ocum
ents
Ex
tract
ion
from
do
cum
ents
Cu
rves
Num
ber o
f new
su
bscr
iber
s/ho
useh
olds
con
nect
ed
to th
e gr
id
Proj
ect d
ocum
ents
Ex
tract
ion
from
do
cum
ents
Cu
rves
Prop
ortio
n of
co
mm
unity
in
frast
ruct
ure
(hea
lth
cent
res,
sch
ools
, m
arke
ts, e
tc.)
conn
ecte
d to
the
elec
tric
pow
er g
rid
Proj
ect d
ocum
ents
Ex
tract
ion
from
do
cum
ents
Cu
rves
3y. %
fem
ale
inha
bita
nts
with
ac
cess
to th
e el
ectri
c po
wer
grid
Proj
ect d
ocum
ents
Ex
tract
ion
from
do
cum
ents
Cu
rves
Rath
er th
an d
raw
ing
on th
e Ba
nk's
RM
F w
hich
doe
s no
t pro
pose
any
, the
indi
cato
rs re
tain
ed c
ome
from
Jos
eph
Mou
anda
(201
4). T
he s
elec
tion
crite
ria: (
i) cl
ear l
ikel
ihoo
d of
ens
urin
g th
e m
ost d
irect
link
with
the
obse
rved
por
tfolio
per
form
ance
; and
(ii)
likel
ihoo
d of
ava
ilabi
lity
of s
econ
dary
dat
a.
76 Senegal: Evaluation of the Bank's Country Strategy and Program 2004–2013 Summary Report
Effe
ctiv
enes
s of
Gov
erna
nce
Proj
ects
Eval
uatio
n Cr
iteria
Spec
ific
Ques
tions
fo
r Sen
egal
Met
hodo
logi
cal
Appr
oach
Mai
n In
dica
tors
Nece
ssar
y Da
taDa
ta S
ourc
esDa
ta C
olle
ctio
n M
etho
dsDa
ta A
naly
sis
Met
hods
Effe
ctive
ness
3.In
rela
tion
to th
e ag
reed
upo
n ou
tcom
es
in th
e di
ffere
nt C
SPs
wha
t wer
e th
e re
sults
of
the
Bank
's le
ndin
g an
d no
n-le
ndin
g op
erat
ions
in S
eneg
al
over
the
2004
-201
3 pe
riod?
Com
bina
tion
of
met
hods
:(a
) Lis
t the
mai
n ou
tcom
es p
rese
nted
in
the
PCRs
, QPA
R an
d M
TR(b
) Ide
ntify
the
resu
lts
obta
ined
by
dire
ct
obse
rvat
ion
in th
e pr
ojec
t are
a;(c
) Ide
ntify
the
resu
lts
obta
ined
thro
ugh
sem
i-stru
ctur
ed
disc
ussi
ons
with
the
bene
ficia
ries
and
othe
r sta
keho
lder
s(d
) Com
pare
the
expe
cted
and
act
ual
outc
omes
3c. %
of r
esul
ts
achi
eved
List
of r
esul
ts a
nd
base
line
leve
ls;
Proj
ect d
ocum
ents
(a
ppra
isal
repo
rts,
MTR
, PCR
); pa
rties
co
ncer
ned
(targ
et
grou
ps, e
xper
ts);
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts; q
uick
su
rvey
(sem
i-st
ruct
ured
dis
cuss
ions
) w
ith s
take
hold
ers
Freq
uenc
y an
alys
is;
Hist
ogra
ms
Num
ber o
f res
ults
pa
rtly
achi
eved
PC
R
Num
ber o
f res
ults
fully
ac
hiev
edPC
R
Outp
ut L
evel
s Se
e PA
RPC
REx
tract
ion
from
do
cum
ents
; qui
ck
surv
ey (s
emi-
stru
ctur
ed d
iscu
ssio
ns)
with
sta
keho
lder
s
Freq
uenc
y an
alys
is
Hist
ogra
ms
77Annexes
An ID
EV C
ount
ry S
trat
egy
Eval
uatio
n
Eval
uatio
n Cr
iteria
Spec
ific
Ques
tions
fo
r Sen
egal
Met
hodo
logi
cal
Appr
oach
Mai
n In
dica
tors
Nece
ssar
y Da
taDa
ta S
ourc
esDa
ta C
olle
ctio
n M
etho
dsDa
ta A
naly
sis
Met
hods
Effe
ctive
ness
3.In
rela
tion
to th
e ag
reed
upo
n ou
tcom
es
in th
e di
ffere
nt C
SPs
wha
t wer
e th
e re
sults
of
the
Bank
's le
ndin
g an
d no
n-le
ndin
g op
erat
ions
in S
eneg
al
over
the
2004
-201
3 pe
riod?
Com
bina
tion
of
met
hods
:(a
) Lis
t the
mai
n ou
tcom
es p
rese
nted
in
the
PCRs
, QPA
R an
d M
TR(b
) Ide
ntify
the
resu
lts
obta
ined
by
dire
ct
obse
rvat
ion
in th
e pr
ojec
t are
a;(c
) Ide
ntify
the
resu
lts
obta
ined
thro
ugh
sem
i-st
ruct
ured
dis
cuss
ions
w
ith th
e be
nefic
iarie
s an
d ot
her s
take
hold
ers
(d) C
ompa
re th
e ex
pect
ed a
nd a
ctua
l ou
tcom
es
Outc
ome
Leve
lsQu
ality
of p
ublic
fin
ance
man
agem
ent
Scor
es o
btai
ned
from
di
ffere
nt s
ourc
es, i
n pa
rticu
lar C
PIA/
AFDB
Proj
ect d
ocum
ents
(a
ppra
isal
repo
rts,
IPRR
, MTR
, PCR
); pa
rties
con
cern
ed
(targ
et g
roup
s,
expe
rts);
Doin
g Bu
sine
ss re
port;
CPI
A;
DER;
AfD
B an
d W
orld
Ba
nk s
tatis
tics
porta
ls
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts;
Hist
ogra
m
Qual
ity o
f pub
lic
adm
inis
tratio
n: (i
) Co
ordi
natio
n an
d re
spon
sive
ness
of
pol
icie
s, (i
i) Se
rvic
e de
liver
y an
d op
erat
iona
l effi
cien
cy;
(iii)
Mer
it an
d et
hics
Scor
es o
btai
ned
from
di
ffere
nt s
ourc
es, i
n pa
rticu
lar C
PIA/
AfDB
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts;
Hist
ogra
m
Qual
ity o
f bus
ines
s cl
imat
e: (a
) reg
ulat
ion
rela
ting
to e
ntry
, exit
an
d co
mpe
titio
n; (b
) re
gula
tion
rega
rdin
g to
the
cond
uct o
f bu
sine
ss; a
nd (c
) re
gula
tion
rela
ting
to th
e fa
ctor
s of
pr
oduc
tion
(labo
ur a
nd
land
).
Scor
es o
btai
ned
from
di
ffere
nt s
ourc
es, i
n pa
rticu
lar C
PIA/
AfDB
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts;
Hist
ogra
m
3i. N
umbe
r of d
ays
requ
ired
to s
tart
a bu
sine
ss
Scor
es o
btai
ned
from
di
ffere
nt s
ourc
es, i
n pa
rticu
lar t
he D
oing
Bu
sine
ss R
epor
t
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts;
Hist
ogra
m
Requ
ired
cost
to s
tart
a bu
sine
ss (
% G
NI/
inha
b)
Scor
es o
btai
ned
from
di
ffere
nt s
ourc
es, i
n pa
rticu
lar C
PIA/
AfDB
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts;
Hist
ogra
m
3j. A
vera
ge s
core
on
the
scal
e (o
f eco
nom
ic
dive
rsifi
catio
n)
Scor
es o
btai
ned
from
di
ffere
nt s
ourc
es, i
n pa
rticu
lar C
PIA/
AfDB
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts;
Hist
ogra
m
"The
eva
luat
ion
shou
ld c
ompa
re th
e ob
ject
ives
agre
ed u
pon
in th
e CS
Ps w
ith th
ose
of th
e pr
ojec
ts th
emse
lves.
In o
rder
to c
arry
out
an
anal
ysis
bet
wee
n th
e co
untri
es a
nd th
e ag
greg
atio
n be
twee
n th
e CS
PEs
and
CEDR
, som
e co
here
nce
is, h
owev
er, r
equi
red'
" (J
acks
on (2
014)
. Thi
s co
here
nce
will
depe
nd o
n w
heth
er th
e co
untry
in th
e CE
DR s
ampl
e ha
s a
gove
rnan
ce p
roje
ct o
r not
and
on
whe
ther
thes
e pr
ojec
ts h
ave
sim
ilar c
ompo
nent
s an
d ob
ject
ives
or n
ot.
The
prop
osed
indi
cato
rs a
re d
raw
n fro
m th
e CP
IA, t
he R
MF
and
the
ERD.
78 Senegal: Evaluation of the Bank's Country Strategy and Program 2004–2013 Summary Report
Effe
ctiv
enes
s of
Reg
iona
l Int
egra
tion
and
Tran
spor
t Pro
ject
sEv
alua
tion
Crite
riaSp
ecifi
c Qu
estio
ns
for S
eneg
alM
etho
dolo
gica
l Ap
proa
chM
ain
Indi
cato
rsNe
cess
ary
Data
Data
Sou
rces
Data
Col
lect
ion
Met
hods
Data
Ana
lysi
s M
etho
dsEf
fect
ivene
ssIn
rela
tion
to th
e ag
reed
upo
n ou
tcom
es
in th
e di
ffere
nt C
SPs
wha
t wer
e th
e re
sults
of
the
Bank
's le
ndin
g an
d no
n-le
ndin
g op
erat
ions
in S
eneg
al
over
the
2004
-201
3 pe
riod?
Com
bina
tion
of
met
hods
:(a
) Lis
t the
mai
n ou
tcom
es p
rese
nted
in
the
PCRs
, QPA
R an
d M
TR(b
) Ide
ntify
the
resu
lts
obta
ined
by
dire
ct
obse
rvat
ion
in th
e pr
ojec
t are
a;(c
) Ide
ntify
the
resu
lts
obta
ined
thro
ugh
sem
i-st
ruct
ured
dis
cuss
ions
w
ith th
e be
nefic
iarie
s an
d ot
her s
take
hold
ers
(d) C
ompa
re th
e ex
pect
ed a
nd a
ctua
l ou
tcom
es
Outp
ut L
evel
sEx
iste
nce
of a
n in
terc
onne
cted
grid
be
twee
n co
untri
es o
f th
e su
b-re
gion
Proj
ect d
ocum
ents
(P
AR, P
CR);
AfDB
st
atis
tics
porta
l
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts
Kilo
met
res
of re
gion
al
road
s an
d co
rrido
rs
built
Tim
e se
ries
Proj
ect d
ocum
ents
(P
AR, P
CR);
AfDB
st
atis
tics
porta
l
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts
Curv
es
Leng
th o
f int
ra-
regi
onal
ele
ctric
pow
er
lines
con
stru
cted
or
reha
bilit
ated
Tim
e se
ries
Proj
ect d
ocum
ents
(P
AR, P
CR);
AfDB
st
atis
tics
porta
l
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts
Curv
es
Num
ber a
nd c
ost o
f re
gion
al in
tegr
atio
n pr
ogra
ms
(regi
onal
in
frast
ruct
ure,
trad
e fa
cilit
atio
n, e
cono
mic
di
vers
ifica
tion,
etc
.)
Tim
e se
ries
Proj
ect d
ocum
ents
(P
AR, P
CR);
AfDB
st
atis
tics
porta
l
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts
Curv
es
Leng
th o
f dom
estic
as
phal
ted
road
ne
twor
k
Tim
e se
ries
Proj
ect d
ocum
ents
(P
AR, P
CR);
AfDB
st
atis
tics
porta
l
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts
Curv
es
79Annexes
An ID
EV C
ount
ry S
trat
egy
Eval
uatio
n
Eval
uatio
n Cr
iteria
Spec
ific
Ques
tions
fo
r Sen
egal
Met
hodo
logi
cal
Appr
oach
Mai
n In
dica
tors
Nece
ssar
y Da
taDa
ta S
ourc
esDa
ta C
olle
ctio
n M
etho
dsDa
ta A
naly
sis
Met
hods
Effe
ctive
ness
In re
latio
n to
the
agre
ed u
pon
outc
omes
in
the
diffe
rent
CSP
s w
hat w
ere
the
resu
lts
of th
e Ba
nk's
lend
ing
and
non-
lend
ing
oper
atio
ns in
Sen
egal
ov
er th
e 20
04-2
013
perio
d?
Com
bina
tion
of
met
hods
:(a
) Lis
t the
mai
n ou
tcom
es p
rese
nted
in
the
PCRs
, QPA
R an
d M
TR(b
) Ide
ntify
the
resu
lts
obta
ined
by
dire
ct
obse
rvat
ion
in th
e pr
ojec
t are
a;(c
) Ide
ntify
the
resu
lts
obta
ined
thro
ugh
sem
i-st
ruct
ured
dis
cuss
ions
w
ith th
e be
nefic
iarie
s an
d ot
her s
take
hold
ers
(d) C
ompa
re th
e ex
pect
ed a
nd a
ctua
l ou
tcom
es
Outc
ome
Leve
lEx
iste
nce
of a
mixe
d pl
anni
ng a
nd/o
r m
anag
emen
t org
an/
plat
form
Proj
ect d
ocum
ents
(P
AR P
CR);
Parti
es
conc
erne
d;
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts;
disc
ussi
ons
with
act
ors
and
adm
inis
tratio
ns
Exis
tenc
e of
com
mon
st
anda
rds
for t
he
coun
tries
con
cern
ed
Proj
ect d
ocum
ents
(P
AR P
CR);
Parti
es
conc
erne
d;
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts;
disc
ussi
ons
with
act
ors
and
adm
inis
tratio
ns
Appl
icat
ion
of c
omm
on
norm
s an
d st
anda
rds
in th
e co
untri
es
conc
erne
d
Proj
ect d
ocum
ents
(P
AR P
CR);
Parti
es
conc
erne
d;
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts;
disc
ussi
ons
with
act
ors
and
adm
inis
tratio
ns
Num
ber o
f wor
kers
in
neig
hbou
ring
coun
tries
on
the
proj
ect/s
ite
Tim
e se
ries
Proj
ect d
ocum
ents
(P
AR P
CR);
Parti
es
conc
erne
d;
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts;
disc
ussi
ons
with
act
ors
and
adm
inis
tratio
ns
Curv
es
Volu
me
of tr
ade
with
co
untri
es o
f the
regi
on
and
also
of i
ntra
-Af
rican
trad
e
Tim
e se
ries
Proj
ect d
ocum
ents
(P
AR P
CR);
Parti
es
conc
erne
d;
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts;
disc
ussi
ons
with
act
ors
and
adm
inis
tratio
ns
Curv
es
Prop
ortio
n of
intra
-re
gion
al tr
ade
in th
e to
tal v
olum
e of
the
coun
try's
trad
e (%
)
Tim
e se
ries
Proj
ect d
ocum
ents
(P
AR P
CR);
Parti
es
conc
erne
d;
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts;
disc
ussi
ons
with
act
ors
and
adm
inis
tratio
ns
Curv
es
Tim
e ne
eded
for
a tru
ck to
tran
sit
a bo
rder
cro
ssin
g
(min
utes
)
Tim
e se
ries
Proj
ect d
ocum
ents
(P
AR P
CR);
Parti
es
conc
erne
d;
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts;
disc
ussi
ons
with
act
ors
and
adm
inis
tratio
ns
Curv
es
The
prop
osed
indi
cato
rs a
re d
raw
n fro
m s
ever
al s
ourc
es (a
) De
Lom
baer
de e
t al.
(201
1) q
uote
d in
Ann
ex 5
of t
he 2
5 No
vem
ber 2
014
Conc
ept N
ote;
(b) B
ank
Grou
p's
2014
to 2
023
Regi
onal
Inte
grat
ion
Stra
tegy
and
Pol
icy
(RIS
P) (N
ov. 2
014)
; (c)
Tab
les
1 (p
age
7) a
nd 2
(pag
e 10
) of t
he B
ank'
s Re
sults
M
easu
rem
ent F
ram
ewor
k (R
MF)
; and
(d) t
he e
xper
ienc
e of
the
eval
uatio
n te
am. T
he li
kelih
ood
of o
btai
ning
the
nece
ssar
y da
ta to
pro
vide
info
rmat
ion
for t
his
indi
cato
r was
a m
ajor
crit
erio
n in
the
deci
sion
for s
elec
ting
indi
cato
rs. F
urth
erm
ore
the
resu
lts o
btai
ned
on th
e ba
sis
of th
e ab
ove
indi
cato
rs re
pres
ent e
ither
pr
ojec
t effe
ctive
ness
or t
he B
ank'
s in
stitu
tiona
l per
form
ance
. The
y ap
pear
as
proj
ect e
ffect
ivene
ss w
here
regi
onal
inte
grat
ion
is o
ne o
f the
pro
ject
obj
ectiv
es (o
r is
an e
xpec
ted
outc
ome)
. Whe
re th
is is
not
the
case
, the
out
puts
rela
ting
to re
gion
al in
tegr
atio
n m
ay b
e co
nsid
ered
as
the
Bank
's p
erfo
rman
ce. I
ndee
d,
regi
onal
inte
grat
ion
form
s pa
rt of
the
inst
itutio
nal m
anda
te o
f the
Ban
k as
an
orga
niza
tion.
Con
sequ
ently
, the
eva
luat
ion
crite
rion
will
depe
nd o
n th
e re
al s
ituat
ion.
80 Senegal: Evaluation of the Bank's Country Strategy and Program 2004–2013 Summary Report
Effe
ctiv
enes
s of
Priv
ate
Sect
or P
roje
cts
Eval
uatio
n Cr
iteria
Spec
ific
Ques
tions
fo
r Sen
egal
Met
hodo
logi
cal
Appr
oach
Mai
n In
dica
tors
Nece
ssar
y Da
taDa
ta S
ourc
esDa
ta C
olle
ctio
n M
etho
dsDa
ta A
naly
sis
Met
hods
Effe
ctive
ness
In re
latio
n to
the
agre
ed u
pon
outc
omes
in
the
diffe
rent
CSP
s w
hat w
ere
the
resu
lts
of th
e Ba
nk's
lend
ing
and
non-
lend
ing
oper
atio
ns in
Sen
egal
ov
er th
e 20
04-2
013
perio
d?
Com
bina
tion
of
met
hods
:(a
) Lis
t the
mai
n ou
tcom
es p
rese
nted
in
the
PCRs
, QPA
R an
d M
TR(b
) Ide
ntify
the
resu
lts
obta
ined
by
dire
ct
obse
rvat
ion
in th
e pr
ojec
t are
a;(c
) Ide
ntify
the
resu
lts
obta
ined
thro
ugh
sem
i-st
ruct
ured
dis
cuss
ions
w
ith th
e be
nefic
iarie
s an
d ot
her s
take
hold
ers
(d) C
ompa
re th
e ex
pect
ed a
nd a
ctua
l ou
tcom
es
3c. %
of r
esul
ts
achi
eved
List
of r
esul
ts a
nd
base
line
leve
ls;
Proj
ect d
ocum
ents
(a
ppra
isal
repo
rts,
IPRR
, MTR
, PCR
); pa
rties
con
cern
ed
(targ
et g
roup
s,
expe
rts);
DER
(201
3);
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts; q
uick
su
rvey
(sem
i-st
ruct
ured
dis
cuss
ions
) w
ith s
take
hold
ers
Freq
uenc
y an
alys
is:
Hist
ogra
ms
Num
ber o
f res
ults
pa
rtly
achi
eved
PC
REx
tract
ion
from
do
cum
ents
; qui
ck
surv
ey (s
emi-
stru
ctur
ed d
iscu
ssio
ns)
with
sta
keho
lder
s
Freq
uenc
y an
alys
is:
Hist
ogra
ms
Num
ber o
f res
ults
fully
ac
hiev
edPC
REx
tract
ion
from
do
cum
ents
; qui
ck
surv
ey (s
emi-
stru
ctur
ed d
iscu
ssio
ns)
with
sta
keho
lder
s
Freq
uenc
y an
alys
is:
Hist
ogra
ms
Outp
ut L
evel
sNu
mbe
r of p
rivat
e se
ctor
ope
ratio
ns in
po
rtfol
io
CSP;
PCR
; PPR
REx
tract
ion
from
do
cum
ents
Hi
stog
ram
Tota
l vol
ume
of
com
mitm
ents
with
pr
ivate
sec
tor
CSP;
PCR
; PPR
REx
tract
ion
from
do
cum
ents
Cu
rve
Outc
ome
Leve
ls3i
. Num
ber o
f day
s re
quire
d to
sta
rt a
busi
ness
Scor
es o
btai
ned
Doin
g Bu
sine
ss R
epor
tEx
tract
ion
from
do
cum
ents
Cu
rve
Num
ber o
f exp
ort
docu
men
ts re
quire
dSc
ores
obt
aine
dDo
ing
Busi
ness
Rep
ort
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts
Curv
e
Num
ber o
f im
port
docu
men
ts re
quire
dSc
ores
obt
aine
dDo
ing
Busi
ness
Rep
ort
Extra
ctio
n fro
m
docu
men
ts
Curv
e
Cum
ulat
ive tu
rnov
er o
f bu
sine
sses
fina
nced
PCR;
PPR
R; P
roje
ct
docu
men
tsEx
tract
ion
from
do
cum
ents
Cu
rve
81Annexes
An ID
EV C
ount
ry S
trat
egy
Eval
uatio
n
Eval
uatio
n Cr
iteria
Spec
ific
Ques
tions
fo
r Sen
egal
Met
hodo
logi
cal
Appr
oach
Mai
n In
dica
tors
Nece
ssar
y Da
taDa
ta S
ourc
esDa
ta C
olle
ctio
n M
etho
dsDa
ta A
naly
sis
Met
hods
Effe
ctive
ness
In re
latio
n to
the
agre
ed u
pon
outc
omes
in
the
diffe
rent
CSP
s w
hat w
ere
the
resu
lts
of th
e Ba
nk's
lend
ing
and
non-
lend
ing
oper
atio
ns in
Sen
egal
ov
er th
e 20
04-2
013
perio
d?
Com
bina
tion
of
met
hods
:(a
) Lis
t the
mai
n ou
tcom
es p
rese
nted
in
the
PCRs
, QPA
R an
d M
TR(b
) Ide
ntify
the
resu
lts
obta
ined
by
dire
ct
obse
rvat
ion
in th
e pr
ojec
t are
a;(c
) Ide
ntify
the
resu
lts
obta
ined
thro
ugh
sem
i-st
ruct
ured
dis
cuss
ions
w
ith th
e be
nefic
iarie
s an
d ot
her s
take
hold
ers
(d) C
ompa
re th
e ex
pect
ed a
nd a
ctua
l ou
tcom
es
Outc
ome
Leve
lsCu
mul
ative
am
ount
of
priv
ate
sect
or c
o-fin
anci
ng
CSP;
PCR
; PPR
REx
tract
ion
from
do
cum
ents
Cu
rve
% o
f cum
ulat
ive
priva
te s
ecto
r co-
finan
cing
CSP;
PCR
; PPR
RCa
lcul
atio
nsHi
stog
ram
Tota
l vol
ume
of ta
xes
paid
to g
over
nmen
t by
busi
ness
es fi
nanc
ed
DCEF
MEF
adm
inis
trativ
e do
cum
ents
; Di
scus
sion
s w
ith
auth
oriti
es
Curv
e
3j. A
vera
ge s
core
on
the
scal
e (o
f eco
nom
ic
dive
rsifi
catio
n)
Scor
es o
btai
ned
CPIA
/AfD
BEx
tract
ion
from
do
cum
ents
Cu
rve
Num
ber o
f dire
ct a
nd
indi
rect
jobs
cre
ated
PCR;
PPR
R; p
roje
ct
docu
men
tsEx
tract
ion
from
do
cum
ents
Cu
rve
Num
ber o
f wom
en
empl
oyed
PCR;
PPR
R; P
roje
ct
docu
men
tsEx
tract
ion
from
do
cum
ents
Cu
rve
The
Bank
's 2
008
Stra
tegy
Pap
er s
et o
ut th
e fo
llow
ing
five
deve
lopm
ent p
riorit
ies
for i
ts o
pera
tions
: (i)
impr
ove
the
busi
ness
clim
ate;
(ii)
supp
ort p
rivat
e en
terp
rises
; (iii)
stre
ngth
en th
e fin
anci
al s
yste
ms;
(iv)
con
stru
ct c
ompe
titive
infra
stru
ctur
e, a
nd (v
) pro
mot
e re
gion
al in
tegr
atio
n an
d tra
de (I
DEV,
201
4, B
ackg
roun
d No
te fo
r Eva
luat
ing
Priva
te S
ecto
r Ope
ratio
ns -
CED
R). T
he p
ropo
sed
indi
cato
rs a
re a
lso
draw
n fro
m th
e De
velo
pmen
t Effe
ctive
ness
Rep
ort f
or S
eneg
al (2
013)
. In
addi
tion,
the
appr
aisa
l rep
orts
of t
he p
roje
cts
conc
erne
d w
ill pr
ovid
e th
e pl
anne
d lis
t of s
peci
fic in
dica
tors
.
82 Senegal: Evaluation of the Bank's Country Strategy and Program 2004–2013 Summary Report
Ann
ex 3
: Rec
ons
titut
ed T
heo
ries
of C
hang
e
Tran
spor
t
Faci
litat
ed a
cces
s to
bas
ic s
ocia
l and
ec
onom
ic s
ervic
es (s
choo
ls, h
ealth
ce
nter
s, m
arke
ts, fi
nanc
ial s
ervic
es, e
tc.)
Incl
usive
Gro
wth
Incr
ease
d st
ate
reve
nues
Regi
onal
inte
grat
ion
faci
litat
ed
Cont
aine
r ter
min
al p
roje
ct
Redu
ced
trans
port
cost
sRe
duce
d op
erat
ing
cost
s of
veh
icle
s
Rura
l tow
ns o
pene
d up
and
cou
ntry
co
nnec
ted
Auto
nom
ous
road
mai
nten
ance
fund
in
pla
ce
Effe
ctive
mai
nten
ance
pro
gram
Road
net
wor
k cl
assi
fied
aver
age
/ roa
d in
goo
d co
nditi
on in
crea
ses
Exte
nded
life
time
of tr
ansp
ort i
nfra
stru
c-tu
reM
ore
Attra
ctive
Eco
nom
y
Tim
e sa
ving
Incr
ease
d Tr
ansp
ort o
f mer
chan
dise
an
d pe
ople
Daka
r-Di
amni
adio
Tol
l hig
hway
Redu
ced
cong
estio
n
Bord
er ro
ads
built
/ re
habi
litat
ed
Expa
ndin
g in
com
e-ge
nera
ting
activ
ities
83Annexes
An ID
EV C
ount
ry S
trat
egy
Eval
uatio
n
Publ
ic G
over
nanc
e Re
form
Resu
lts-B
ased
Pu
blic
Man
age-
men
ts PARE
PAM
OCA
PARE
VOLO
pro
ject
PACI
CEPA
DPS
PPC/
PNDL
Effe
ctive
Pro
gres
s in
Pov
erty
Re
duct
ion
Incr
ease
d pr
ivate
se
ctor
par
ticip
atio
n
Faci
litat
ion
of
SME
acce
ss to
ba
nk c
redi
t and
fin
anci
ng
Faci
litat
ion
of
SME
acce
ss to
pu
blic
con
tract
s
Faci
litat
ion
of
priva
te s
ecto
r ac
cess
to c
redi
t an
d fin
anci
ng
Netw
orks
of
co
mm
unity
fe
eder
ro
ads
built
Cont
inuo
us
mai
nte-
nanc
e of
ru
ral r
oads
Loca
l pro
ject
man
agem
ent c
apac
ities
built
up
Incr
ease
d m
arke
ting
of ru
ral
agric
ultu
ral p
rodu
ctio
n
Acce
lera
ted
and
Incl
usive
Gr
owth
Incr
ease
d ce
ntra
l go
vern
men
t rev
enue
Impr
oved
m
onito
ring
of
publ
ic p
olic
ies
Relia
ble
soci
o-ec
onom
ic
stat
istic
al
info
rmat
ion
avai
labl
e
Road
mai
n-te
nanc
e bu
dget
av
aila
ble
Data
ava
ilabl
e on
SM
E ris
ks
Incr
ease
d SM
E pa
rtici
patio
n
Capa
citie
s of
SM
Es
and
bank
ing
inst
itutio
ns
built
up
Cour
t dec
isio
ns
exec
uted
with
in
9 m
onth
s
PAAS
PPA
RE
Grow
th o
f w
omen
's
and
yout
h en
trepr
eneu
rshi
p
Adm
inis
trativ
e ca
paci
ties
built
up
Tran
spar
ent a
dmin
is-
trativ
e pr
actic
es a
nd
proc
edur
es
Drop
in
the
num
ber
of d
irec-
tly n
e-go
tiate
d co
ntra
cts
Cust
oms
clea
ranc
e tim
e sh
orte
ned
Tax
base
br
oade
-ne
d
Land
title
ac
quis
i-tio
n tim
e re
duce
d to
4 m
on-
ths
Publ
ic a
dmin
istra
tions
pro
vidin
g bu
sine
ss s
ervic
es im
prov
ed
84 Senegal: Evaluation of the Bank's Country Strategy and Program 2004–2013 Summary Report
Agric
ultu
re a
nd R
ural
Dev
elop
men
t
Incr
ease
d ag
ricul
tura
l and
rura
l inco
mes
Num
ber o
f cat
tle in
crea
sed
Food
sec
urity
PAPI
L
PASA
/LOU
MAK
AFPA
DERB
A
PADE
RCA
PPC/
PNIR
PREF
ELAG
Cattl
e po
nds
cons
truct
ed
6 71
9 Ha
of
sur
face
ar
ea
sow
n
Daily
dai
ry
prod
uctio
n at
0.8
litre
s (1
,776
,000
lit
res)
41 1
63 T
of
cer
eals
in
201
4
Reco
very
of
econ
omic
ac
tiviti
es a
roun
d La
ke G
uier
s
3525
T o
f ve
geta
bles
pr
oduc
ed
in 2
014
1206
.4 k
m o
f rur
al ro
ads
in 8
4 co
mm
unitie
s ar
e co
nstru
cted
Capa
cities
of s
tock
bree
der
asso
ciatio
n bu
ilt up
Wat
er
man
agem
ent
infra
stru
ctur
e bu
ilt (w
etla
nds
and
irrig
ated
ar
eas
deve
lope
d,
dike
s an
d ca
nals
)
Sust
aina
ble
reso
urce
m
anag
emen
t sy
stem
s
Pove
rty re
duce
d
PAPI
L
Anti-
salt
dike
s,
prot
ectio
n di
kes
Prod
uctiv
e an
d ec
ologi
cal c
apita
l pr
eser
ved
and/
or im
prov
ed27
9 au
tono
mou
s an
d op
erat
ional
gr
oupi
ngs
at
end
Mar
ch
Agro
-pas
tora
l pro
duct
ion s
yste
ms
adap
ted
to
clim
ate
chan
ge
86%
incr
ease
in a
gric
ultu
ral
prod
uctio
n (ri
ce, c
erea
ls,
vege
tabl
es, e
tc.)
Prod
uctio
n ar
eas
open
ed
up
Incr
ease
d m
arke
ting
of a
gricu
ltura
l pro
duct
ion
3635
inte
nsifi
ed
mixe
d fa
rms
esta
blis
hed
(fatte
ning
, br
eede
rs)
PAPE
L II
PROG
EBE
98%
of
ende
mic
ca
ttle
Prod
uctiv
ity
on th
e ba
sis
of w
eigh
t up
to 4
4.9
kg fo
r ca
ttle,
14
kg fo
r sh
eep
and
15.2
kg
for g
oats
Vuln
erab
ility o
f agr
icultu
ral a
nd ru
ral a
ctivi
ties
redu
ced
5723
Ha
of la
nd
recla
imed
or
rege
nera
ted
85Annexes
An ID
EV C
ount
ry S
trat
egy
Eval
uatio
n
Ener
gy
117
phot
ovol
taic
sy
stem
s in
stal
led
Elec
tric
pow
er
avai
labl
e to
bus
ines
ses
104
batte
ries
and
8 ch
argi
ng
mod
ules
1091
km
of
MV/
LV li
nes
104
trans
form
ers
stat
ions
inst
alle
d
Acce
lera
ted
and
incl
usive
gro
wth
Regu
lato
ry
capa
citie
s st
reng
then
edIn
crea
sed
elec
tric
pow
er g
ener
atio
n
Grid
per
form
ance
im
prov
ed
Redu
ctio
n in
cos
t pr
ice
of e
lect
ricity
Redu
ctio
n in
co
nsum
er p
rice
of e
lect
ricity
Econ
omic
Ref
orm
Su
ppor
t Pro
ject
(P
ARE)
Koun
oune
Send
ou p
roje
ct
ASER
offi
ces
oper
atio
nal
Rura
l Ele
ctrifi
catio
n Pr
ojec
t
Elec
tric
pow
er
avai
labl
e in
rura
l are
as
Acce
ss to
bas
ic ru
ral s
ervic
esRu
ral i
ncom
e-ge
nera
ting
activ
ities
275
villa
ges
conn
ecte
d to
ele
ctric
ity g
rids
6 el
ectri
c po
wer
ge
nera
tion
ther
mal
pla
nts
Elec
tric
pow
er
gene
ratio
n st
atio
ns
86 Senegal: Evaluation of the Bank's Country Strategy and Program 2004–2013 Summary Report
Wat
er a
nd S
anita
tion
Incr
ease
d in
com
e-ge
nera
ting
activ
ities
Incr
ease
d gi
rls
enro
lmen
t
Indi
vidua
l con
nect
ions
in
crea
sed
DWS
netw
ork
com
mun
ity
man
agem
ent s
yste
m
oper
atio
nal (
ASUF
OR)
DWS
infra
stru
ctur
e es
tabl
ishe
d (b
oreh
oles
, pum
ps
netw
orks
etc
)
Incr
ease
d qu
antit
y of
ferti
lizer
, gas
and
re
usab
le w
ater
from
dr
aine
d sl
udge
Acce
ss to
impr
oved
la
trine
sAc
cess
to d
rinki
ng w
ater
Deco
ncen
trate
d pu
blic
ser
vice
capa
citie
s bu
ilt u
p
Redu
ctio
n in
the
prev
alen
ce o
f wat
er
and
hygi
ene-
rela
ted
dise
ases
Sens
itiza
tion
cam
paig
ns
(com
mun
icat
ion
for c
hang
e)
Fam
ily la
trine
s an
d w
ash
tubs
co
nstru
cted
Trea
tmen
t pla
nt
reha
bilit
ated
Publ
ic la
vato
ries
(latri
nes)
bui
ltW
aste
wat
er
pum
ping
sys
tem
co
nstru
cted
/re
habi
litate
d
Mem
ber t
rain
ing
sess
ions
Incr
ease
d pr
oduc
tion
conn
ectio
nsCo
ntin
uous
drin
king
w
ater
sup
ply
Equi
pmen
t
87Annexes
An ID
EV C
ount
ry S
trat
egy
Eval
uatio
n
Soci
al D
evel
opm
ent
Heal
th II
Educ
atio
n IV
Sens
itiza
tion
cam
paig
ns
for w
omen
Heal
th
pers
onne
l re
crui
ted
Heal
th c
are
esta
blis
hmen
ts
equi
pped
Healt
h ca
re
esta
blish
men
ts
(hos
pita
ls po
sts,
cent
res)
co
nstru
cted
Redu
ction
in
mor
bidi
ty an
d m
orta
lity
Appr
opria
te
prac
tices
are
ad
opte
d es
pecia
lly
by w
omen
Incr
ease
d ac
cess
to
educ
ation
Acad
emic
pe
rform
ance
s of
stu
dent
s im
prov
ed
Educ
ation
al
cond
itions
im
prov
ed
Incr
ease
d in
take
cap
acity
Scho
ol
textb
ooks
di
strib
uted
Teac
hers
re
-train
ed
(train
ed)
Build
ing
proje
cts
finan
ced
Man
a-ge
men
t ca
pacit
y im
prov
edAd
ditio
nal
class
room
s co
nstru
cted
Girls
edu
catio
n pr
omot
ion
cam
paig
ns
Healt
h ca
re q
uality
im
prov
edIn
crea
sed
acce
ss
to h
ealth
ser
vices
Broa
der
terri
toria
l co
vera
ge b
y he
alth
syst
em
Gros
s en
rolm
ent r
ate
incr
ease
d,
espe
cially
of
girls
Healt
h pe
rson
nel
and
serv
ice
prov
ider
s tra
ined
Impr
oved
qua
lity
of h
uman
reso
urce
s
88 Senegal: Evaluation of the Bank's Country Strategy and Program 2004–2013 Summary Report
Annex 4: Administrative Map of Senegal
Matam
Mauritania
Mali
GuineaGuinea-Bissau
Tambacounda
Kédougou
Kolda
SedhiouZiguinchor
Kaolack
Fatick
Kaolack
Diourbel
LinguèreKébémer
Thiès
Mbour
Louga
Saint-Louis
Podor
Richard-Toll DaganaThillé-Boubacar
Dodji
Barkedji
Yang-Yang
Dahra
Sagatta-Diolof
Darou-Mousty
SagattaNdande
Mérina-Dakhar
Baba-Garage
LambayeBambey Ndoulo
Mbécké Ndame
Colobane
GossasNiakhar
DiakhaoGandiaye
SibassorFimela
FoundiougneDjilor
Sokone
Toubakouta
Banjul
Niodior
Tattaguine OuadiourGuinguineo
Mbadakhoune
KoumbalNdoffane
Ndiédieng
Wack-Ngouna Nioro Médina-
Sbakh
Paos-Koto
Kahone BirkelaneKaffrineMalem-Hodar Maka-Yop
KoungheulNganda
KaelNgoye
Ndindy
Niakhéne
MekheMéouane
Tivaouane
KhomboleThiénaba
NotoFissel
Sessène
Pout
SindiaNguékokh
Joal
Pambal
Thilogne
OurossoguiOgo
Sinthiou-Bamambé
Orkadièrè
Lemmé
Bakel
Kidira
Goudiry
Bala
Missitah
Koussanar
Maka
VélingaraBonconto
Kounkané
Pakour
Dabo
Dioulacolon
Médina-Yoro-Foulah
BounkilingDiouloulou
Sindian
BignonaThionck-Essyl
Tendouck Tenghory
NiaguisNyassiaOussouye
Kabrousse
Loudia-Ouolof
Diende
Tanaff
Marsassoum
Goudomp
Diattacounda
Djibabouya
Koumpentoum
Simenti
SalémataBandafassi
Fongolimbi
Saraya
Dlawara
Kanel
Gamadji-Sarré
Ndioum
Cascas
GollereSaldé
Agnam-Civol
MbaneRoss Béthio
DakarRunsque
Pikine
Gambia
Source: http://carte-du-monde.fr/tag-senegal.html, May 2014
89Annexes
An ID
EV C
ount
ry S
trat
egy
Eval
uatio
n
Annex 5: Results Framework for Bank's Strategy in Senegal (2002–2004)
Pillars Pillar 1: Poverty Reduction Pillar 2: Improvement of Human Resource Quality
Pillar 3: Sustainable growth focused on private initiative
Outcomes Reduction in the vulnerability of agricultural activities and rural development
Consolidation of macroeconomic framework
Outputs
Activities/Operations
Local Small-Scale Irrigation Support Project for UA 14.31 million
Health Project II for UA 11.35 million Project for Support to the Directorate of Forecasts and Statistics and to the PRSP Monitoring Unit for UA 1.55 million
Livestock Sub-sector Development Study for UA 0.79 million
Education IV project for UA 14.84 million
Private Sector Adjustment Support Program for UA 24 million
Rural Electrification Project for an amount of UA 9.58 million
Inputs/Resources
Net commitments of UA 76.42 million
Source: AfDB. 2004. 2002-2004 Country Strategy Paper as updated in 2004, OCCW, Document no. ADF/BD/WP/2003/26/Add.2 and ADB/BD/WP/2003/30/Add.2 of 9 August 2004.
90 Senegal: Evaluation of the Bank's Country Strategy and Program 2004–2013 Summary Report
Ann
ex 6
: 200
5-20
09 R
esul
ts-B
ased
CS
P F
ram
ewo
rkPi
llars
Pilla
r I: I
mpr
ovem
ent o
f the
bus
ines
s en
viro
nmen
t to
acce
lera
te g
row
thPi
llar I
I: Re
info
rcem
ent o
f Bas
ic In
fras
truc
ture
Sect
ors
Gove
rnan
ceAg
ricul
ture
&
Rura
l De
velo
pmen
t
Wat
er a
nd
Sani
tatio
nEn
ergy
Soci
al S
ecto
rTr
ansp
ort
Impa
cts
Budg
et
man
agem
ent
and
awar
d of
pu
blic
con
tract
s ar
e tra
nspa
rent
Exec
utio
n of
co
urt d
ecis
ions
do
es n
ot
exce
ed 9
m
onth
s
Doub
ling
of
num
ber o
f lan
d tit
le d
eeds
pr
oduc
ed a
nd
dist
ribut
ed
Reco
very
of
prod
uctiv
e ac
tiviti
es in
Ca
sam
ance
Outc
omes
20%
of
cont
ract
s w
ere
awar
ded
by d
irect
ne
gotia
tion
in
2007
The
MTE
F of
the
four
pr
iorit
y se
ctor
s op
erat
iona
l in
2007
The
time
requ
ired
to
obta
in a
land
tit
le d
eed
redu
ced
from
4
year
s to
1 y
ear
in 2
007
Priva
te s
ecto
r co
ntrib
utio
n to
GD
P ris
es to
72
.5%
in 2
007
and
to 7
8% in
20
09;
Acce
ss to
sa
fe d
rinki
ng
wat
er w
ithin
15
min
utes
is
42.5
% in
rura
l ar
eas
in 2
007
rises
to 4
5% in
20
09
Acce
ss to
m
edic
al
serv
ices
and
to
prim
ary
scho
ol
with
in 3
0 m
inut
es ri
ses
to
78.5
% in
200
7
The
clas
sifie
d ro
ad n
etw
ork
in a
vera
ge a
nd
good
con
ditio
n in
crea
ses
by
1.5
poin
ts in
20
07
Use
of
the
dire
ct
nego
tiatio
n m
etho
d be
cam
e a
n ex
cept
ion
in
2009
The
time
requ
ired
to
obta
in a
land
tit
le d
eed
redu
ced
to 4
m
onth
s
The
grow
th ra
te
rises
to 7
% in
20
07 a
nd 8
%
in 2
009
Acce
ss to
m
edic
al
serv
ices
and
to
prim
ary
scho
ol
with
in 3
0 m
inut
es ri
ses
to
80%
in 2
009
The
clas
sifie
d ro
ad n
etw
ork
in a
vera
ge a
nd
good
con
ditio
n in
crea
ses
by 3
po
ints
in 2
009
Outp
uts
Diam
niad
io
deve
lopm
ent
hub
is
esta
blis
hed
Activ
ities
/Op
erat
ions
Cont
inui
ng
impl
emen
tatio
n of
PAA
SP
Priva
te
Sect
or a
nd
Gove
rnan
ce
Supp
ort
Proj
ects
II
and
III
PAM
OCA
Casa
man
ce
Proj
ect
Wat
er In
itiat
ive
Proj
ect
Rura
l El
ectri
ficat
ion
Proj
ect
Educ
atio
n Pr
ojec
t IV
Road
M
aint
enan
ce
Proj
ect (
PER)
91Annexes
An ID
EV C
ount
ry S
trat
egy
Eval
uatio
n
Sour
ce: A
fDB,
Sen
egal
– 2
005-
2009
Cou
ntry
Stra
tegy
Pap
er, D
ocum
ent n
o. A
DF/B
D/W
P/20
05/6
5/Re
v., p
age
35
Pilla
rsPi
llar I
: Im
prov
emen
t of t
he b
usin
ess
envi
ronm
ent t
o ac
cele
rate
gro
wth
Pilla
r II:
Rein
forc
emen
t of B
asic
Infr
astr
uctu
reSe
ctor
sGo
vern
ance
Agric
ultu
re
& Ru
ral
Deve
lopm
ent
Wat
er a
nd
Sani
tatio
nEn
ergy
Soci
al S
ecto
rTr
ansp
ort
Edib
le O
il Pr
oduc
tion
Proj
ect
Kouo
une
Elec
tric
Pow
er
Plan
t Pro
ject
Heal
th P
roje
ct II
Kita
-Kat
i-Sa
raya
-Ke
doug
ou
(Mal
i/Sen
egal
) M
ultin
atio
nal
Road
Pro
ject
Smal
l-sca
le
Irrig
atio
n Pr
ojec
t (PA
PIL)
Ross
o M
ultin
atio
nal
Brid
ge
Cons
truct
ion
Proj
ect
(Sen
egal
/M
aurit
ania
)
Inpu
ts/
Reso
urce
s
92 Senegal: Evaluation of the Bank's Country Strategy and Program 2004–2013 Summary Report
Annex 7A: Results-Based Logical Framework of 2010-2015 CSP (Pillar 1)Pillars Pillar I: Improvement of Investment Promotion and Diversification Support FrameworkSectors Promotion of Good Financial Governance Improvement of Business Climate Agriculture/
Agro-IndustryTourism Mines
Impacts Build the capacities of financial administrations to fully enforce the provisions of the Decree determining the timetable and methods for budget preparation
Assist MEF with preparation of new budget regulatory provisions to be introduced in the General Regulations on Public Accounting (RGCP)
Support implementation of Paris Declaration recommendations
Contribute to the standardization of administration's taxpayer database in order to use the tax identifier as a key for exchanges of information
Support implementation of the reform of the Court of Auditors and the project to build its capacities
Complete the establishment of the institutional framework by deploying it to the 4 regional hubs (St Louis, Ziguinchor, Kaolack and Thiès) and ensuring widespread use of SYGMAP
Improve Senegal's Doing Business ranking and build the capacities of judicial structures
Reduce administrative red tape and the technical constraints of business law and social legislation
Support the reorganization of the horticultural sub-sector as part of the horticultural production and export development and diversification plan
Support the establishment of an attractive legal and tax framework for investmentsand the review of provisions governing tourism and hotel management
Help to organize gold panners in SMEs
Help to streamline the management of natural resource exploitation rights
Outcomes SMTEF for 15 new ministries between 2009 and 2012
The new budget regulatory provisions transposed in the RGCP enter into force
Legal texts are adopted on procedures for the budget execution and control of autonomous agencies, public and decentralized administrations
Establishment of the single tax identifier file
The revision work on the legal texts on the operating modalities of the Court of Auditors are finalized no later than 2012
Under 20% of all public contracts awarded by direct agreement including those of the autonomous agencies
Coverage by private offices rises from 0 to Sub-Saharan African countries’ average (1.5)
Exports of 37,000 T of fruit and vegetables in 2012 and 75, 000 T in 2015
VAT on tourism activities is 10% in 2012 compared to 18% in 2010
Gold panners are organized in SMEs in 2012
The comparative study is completed in 2012
Outcomes SMTEF for 5 new ministries between 2012 and 2015
SIGFIP and ASTER software are interfaced
Branch funds must be deposited at the Treasury (single Treasury account)
The national identification number of enterprisesand associations is placed online to facilitate the issuance of NINEA’s administrative document and the deployment of the system in the services of ANSD, DGID and APIX
Institutional support to the Court of Auditors is effective
Restriction abolished relating to the participation of community-based enterprises
Reduce timeframes for tax formalities from 666 days to 306 days (African average) in 2012 and from 306 to 194 days (OECD average) in 2015
The Senegal destination is attractive and the number of entries rises from 800,000 in 2009 to 2 million in 2015
Gold panner yields have improved in 2015
The study recommendations are implemented in 2015
The credit freezing function is activated in SIGFIP
Monthly entry of expenditure on external resources in SIGFIP
Financial autonomy of ARMP is guaranteed by the issuance of an Order determining the fee and the modalities for its collection
Reduce contract execution periods from 780 to 643 days (African average) in 2012 and 643 to 462 days (OECD average) in 2015
Outcomes The practice of quarterly commitment plans is institutionalized
SIGFIP and investment expenditure monitoring software are interfaced
The management of exploitations rights are streamlined in 2015
93Annexes
An ID
EV C
ount
ry S
trat
egy
Eval
uatio
n
Pillars Pillar I: Improvement of Investment Promotion and Diversification Support FrameworkSectors Promotion of Good Financial Governance Improvement of Business Climate Agriculture/
Agro-IndustryTourism Mines
Impacts Build the capacities of financial administrations to fully enforce the provisions of the Decree determining the timetable and methods for budget preparation
Assist MEF with preparation of new budget regulatory provisions to be introduced in the General Regulations on Public Accounting (RGCP)
Support implementation of Paris Declaration recommendations
Contribute to the standardization of administration's taxpayer database in order to use the tax identifier as a key for exchanges of information
Support implementation of the reform of the Court of Auditors and the project to build its capacities
Complete the establishment of the institutional framework by deploying it to the 4 regional hubs (St Louis, Ziguinchor, Kaolack and Thiès) and ensuring widespread use of SYGMAP
Improve Senegal's Doing Business ranking and build the capacities of judicial structures
Reduce administrative red tape and the technical constraints of business law and social legislation
Support the reorganization of the horticultural sub-sector as part of the horticultural production and export development and diversification plan
Support the establishment of an attractive legal and tax framework for investmentsand the review of provisions governing tourism and hotel management
Help to organize gold panners in SMEs
Help to streamline the management of natural resource exploitation rights
Outcomes SMTEF for 15 new ministries between 2009 and 2012
The new budget regulatory provisions transposed in the RGCP enter into force
Legal texts are adopted on procedures for the budget execution and control of autonomous agencies, public and decentralized administrations
Establishment of the single tax identifier file
The revision work on the legal texts on the operating modalities of the Court of Auditors are finalized no later than 2012
Under 20% of all public contracts awarded by direct agreement including those of the autonomous agencies
Coverage by private offices rises from 0 to Sub-Saharan African countries’ average (1.5)
Exports of 37,000 T of fruit and vegetables in 2012 and 75, 000 T in 2015
VAT on tourism activities is 10% in 2012 compared to 18% in 2010
Gold panners are organized in SMEs in 2012
The comparative study is completed in 2012
Outcomes SMTEF for 5 new ministries between 2012 and 2015
SIGFIP and ASTER software are interfaced
Branch funds must be deposited at the Treasury (single Treasury account)
The national identification number of enterprisesand associations is placed online to facilitate the issuance of NINEA’s administrative document and the deployment of the system in the services of ANSD, DGID and APIX
Institutional support to the Court of Auditors is effective
Restriction abolished relating to the participation of community-based enterprises
Reduce timeframes for tax formalities from 666 days to 306 days (African average) in 2012 and from 306 to 194 days (OECD average) in 2015
The Senegal destination is attractive and the number of entries rises from 800,000 in 2009 to 2 million in 2015
Gold panner yields have improved in 2015
The study recommendations are implemented in 2015
The credit freezing function is activated in SIGFIP
Monthly entry of expenditure on external resources in SIGFIP
Financial autonomy of ARMP is guaranteed by the issuance of an Order determining the fee and the modalities for its collection
Reduce contract execution periods from 780 to 643 days (African average) in 2012 and 643 to 462 days (OECD average) in 2015
Outcomes The practice of quarterly commitment plans is institutionalized
SIGFIP and investment expenditure monitoring software are interfaced
The management of exploitations rights are streamlined in 2015
94 Senegal: Evaluation of the Bank's Country Strategy and Program 2004–2013 Summary Report
Pillars Pillar I: Improvement of Investment Promotion and Diversification Support FrameworkSectors Promotion of Good Financial Governance Improvement of Business Climate Agriculture/
Agro-IndustryTourism Mines
Outcomes The ASTER software perimeter covers all the accounting items
Monthly budget execution statements by Ministry and title and in the 4 phases of the expenditure circuit are published on the MEF web site and accessible to the general public
Outputs
Activities/Operations
Budget support I (PASRP I)
Budget Support I (PASRP I)
Budget Support I (PASRP I)
Budget Support I (PASRP I)
Budget Support I (PASRP I)
Local small-scale irrigation project (PAPIL)
Budget support II (PASRP II)
Budget Support II (PASRP II)
Budget Support II (PASRP II)
Budget Support I I (PASRP II)
Budget Support I I (PASRP II)
PAPIL Supplementary Loan
Budget support III (PASRP III)
Budget Support III (PASRP III)
Budget Support III (PASRP III)
Budget Support III (PASRP III)
Budget Support III (PASRP III)
OMVS multinational project to protect the ecosystems of the Senegal River Basin
Project for Institutional Support to Financial Authorities (PAIRF)
Project for Institutional Support to Financial Authorities (PAIRF)
Project for Institutional Support to Financial Authorities PAIRF)
Project for Institutional Support to Financial Authorities PAIRF)
Project for Institutional Support to Financial Authorities PAIRF)
Inputs/Resources
Source: ADF/BD/WP/2010/144, 22 Nov 2010
95Annexes
An ID
EV C
ount
ry S
trat
egy
Eval
uatio
n
Pillars Pillar I: Improvement of Investment Promotion and Diversification Support FrameworkSectors Promotion of Good Financial Governance Improvement of Business Climate Agriculture/
Agro-IndustryTourism Mines
Outcomes The ASTER software perimeter covers all the accounting items
Monthly budget execution statements by Ministry and title and in the 4 phases of the expenditure circuit are published on the MEF web site and accessible to the general public
Outputs
Activities/Operations
Budget support I (PASRP I)
Budget Support I (PASRP I)
Budget Support I (PASRP I)
Budget Support I (PASRP I)
Budget Support I (PASRP I)
Local small-scale irrigation project (PAPIL)
Budget support II (PASRP II)
Budget Support II (PASRP II)
Budget Support II (PASRP II)
Budget Support I I (PASRP II)
Budget Support I I (PASRP II)
PAPIL Supplementary Loan
Budget support III (PASRP III)
Budget Support III (PASRP III)
Budget Support III (PASRP III)
Budget Support III (PASRP III)
Budget Support III (PASRP III)
OMVS multinational project to protect the ecosystems of the Senegal River Basin
Project for Institutional Support to Financial Authorities (PAIRF)
Project for Institutional Support to Financial Authorities (PAIRF)
Project for Institutional Support to Financial Authorities PAIRF)
Project for Institutional Support to Financial Authorities PAIRF)
Project for Institutional Support to Financial Authorities PAIRF)
Inputs/Resources
96 Senegal: Evaluation of the Bank's Country Strategy and Program 2004–2013 Summary Report
Annex 7A: Results-Based Logical Framework of 2010-2015 CSP (Pillar 1)
Pillars Pillar II: Contribution to Reinforcement of National and Regional InfrastructureSectors Water and Sanitation Rational Natural
Resource ExploitationTransport Energy
Impacts Contribute to the expansion of services and improvement of service delivery quality
Intensify efforts to preserve, safeguard and enhance the Environment and to combat desertification
Monthly budget execution statements by Ministry and title and in the 4 phases of the expenditure circuit are published on the MEF web site and accessible to the general public
Outcomes 98% drinking water access rate in urban areas in 2012and 100% in 2015
2300 ha of salty land reclaimed in 2012 and 2985 ha in 2015
Rehabilitation and widening of 75km of roads in 2012 and 252 km in 2015
Gap narrowed by 15%
76% drinking water access rate in rural areas in 2012and 82% in 2015
940 ha of land reforested or treated by SWC/SRC in 2012 and 1190 ha in 2015
64% sanitation access rate in urban areas in 2012 and 78% in 2015
1066 ha of irrigated areas and agricultural wetlands developed in 2012 and 1736 ha in 2015
20% sanitation access rate in rural areas from 2012
10 waterways cleared on the RB and LB to prevent the return of invasive aquatic plants (Typha) in 2012 and 33 in 2015
19 stock watering ponds deepened in 2012 and 19 in 2015
Outputs Construction of 2x368 MW hydro-power dams and 1700km interconnection line
Activities/Operation
Toll motorway Kounoune thermal power plant
Thiès-Linguère Project Sendou coal-fired power-plant project
Tamba-Kedougou Project OMVG I (Kaleta)
Dakar-Bamako Corridor OMVG I (Sambagalou)
Dakar-Conakry Corridor
Gambia bridge
Rosso Bridge Budget Support III
Inputs/Resources
Source: ADF/BD/WP/2010/144, 22 Nov 2010
97Annexes
An ID
EV C
ount
ry S
trat
egy
Eval
uatio
n
Annex 8: Selected Comparative Socioeconomic Indicators for Senegal
Year Senegal Africa Developing Countries
Developed Countries
Basic IndicatorArea ('000km2) 2014 197 30 067 80 386 53 939
Total Population (million) 2014 14,5 1 136,9 6,0 1,3
Urban Population (% of Total) 2014 43,4 39,9 47,6 78,7
Population Density (per km2) 2014 74,0 37,8 73,3 24,3
GNI per Capita (US $) 2013 1 050 2 310 4 168 39 812
Labor Force Participation - Total (%) 2014 76,6 66,1 67,7 72,3
Labor Force Participation - Female (%) 2014 44,9 42,8 52,9 65,1
Gender - Related Development Index Value 2007–2013 0,864 0,801 0,506 0,792
Human Development Index (Rank among 187 countries)
2013 163 ... ... ...
Population living Below $ 1.25 a day (% of population)
2008–2013 34,1 39,6 17,0 ...
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
2000 2005 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Senegal Africa
GNI per capita US $
98 Senegal: Evaluation of the Bank's Country Strategy and Program 2004–2013 Summary Report
Year Senegal Africa Developing Countries
Developed Countries
Demographic IndicatorsPopulation Growth Rate - Total (%) 2014 2,9 2,5 1,3 0,4
Population Growth Rate - Urban (%) 2014 3,6 3,4 2,5 0,7
Population < 15 years (%) 2014 43,4 40,8 28,2 17,0
Population >= 65 years (%) 2014 2,9 3,5 6,3 16,3
Dependency Ratio (%) 2014 82,5 62,4 54,3 50,4
Sex Ratio (per 100 female) 2014 96,4 100,4 107,7 105,4
Female Population 15-49 years (% of total population)
2014 24,4 24,0 26,0 23,0
Life Expectancy at Birth - Total (years) 2014 63,6 59,6 69,2 79,3
Life Expectancy at Birth - Female (years) 2014 65,0 60,7 71,2 82,3
curde Birth Rate (per 1,000) 2014 37,3 34,4 20,9 11,4
curde Birth Rate (per 1,000) 2014 7,5 10,2 7,7 9,2
Infant Mortality Rate (per 1,000) 2013 43,9 56,7 36,8 5,1
Child Mortality Rate (per 1,000) 2013 55,3 84,0 50,2 6,1
Total Fertility Rate (per women) 2014 4,9 4,6 2,6 1,7
Maternal Mortality Rate (per 100,000) 2013 320,0 411,5 230,0 17,0
Women Using Contraception (%) 2014 17,4 34,9 62,0 ...
2,0
2,5
3,0
2000 2005 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
AfricaSenegal
Population Growth Rate (%)
99Annexes
An ID
EV C
ount
ry S
trat
egy
Eval
uatio
n
Year Senegal Africa Developing Countries
Developed Countries
Health & Nutrition IndicatorsPhysicians (per 100,000 people) 2004–2012 5,9 46,9 118,1 308,0
Nurses (per 100,000 people)* 2004–2012 42,0 133,4 202,9 857,4
Births attended by Trained Health Personnel (%)
2009–2012 65,1 50,6 67,7 ...
Access to Safe Water (% of population) 2012 74,1 67,2 87,2 99,2
Healthy life expectancy at birth (years) 2012 55,0 51,3 57 69
Access to Sanitation (% of Population) 2012 51,9 38,8 56,9 96,2
Percent. of adults (aged 15-49) Living with HIV / AIDS
2013 0,5 3,7 1,2 ...
Incidence of Tuberculosis (per 100,000) 2013 136,0 246,0 149,0 22,0
Child Immunization Against Tuberculosis (%) 2013 97,0 84,3 90,0 ...
Child Immunization Against Measies (%) 2013 84,0 76,0 82,7 93,9
Underweight Children (% of children under 5 years)
2005–2013 16,8 20,9 17,0 0,9
Daily Calorie Supply per Capita 2011 2 426 2 618 2 335 3 503
Public Expenditure on Health (as % of GDP) 2013 2,2 2,7 3,1 7,3
50
60
70
2000 2005 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
AfricaSenegal
Life Expectancy at Birth (years)
100 Senegal: Evaluation of the Bank's Country Strategy and Program 2004–2013 Summary Report
Year Senegal Africa Developing Countries
Developed Countries
Education IndicatorsGross Enroiment Ratio (%)
Primary School - Total 2011–2014 83,6 106,3 109,4 101,3
Primary School - Female 2011–2014 87,1 102,6 107,6 101,1
Secondary School - Total 2011–2014 41,0 54,3 69,0 100,2
Secondary School - Female 2011–2014 39,1 51,4 67,7 99,9
Primary School Female Teaching Staff (% of Total)
2012–2014 32,4 45,1 58,1 81,6
Adult literacy Rate - Total (%) 2006–2012 52,1 61,9 80,4 99,2
Adult literacy Rate - Male (%) 2006–2012 66,3 70,2 85,9 99,3
Adult literacy Rate - Female (%) 2006–2012 40,4 53,5 75,2 99,0
Percentage of GDP Spent on Education 2009–2012 5,6 5,3 4,3 5,5
Environmental IndicatorsLand Use (Arable Land as % of Total Land Area)
2012 17,4 8,8 11,8 9,2
Agricultural Land (as % of land Area) 2012 0,5 43,4 43,4 28,9
Forest (As % of Land Area) 2012 43,6 22,1 28,3 34,9
Per Capita CO2 Emissions (metric tons) 2012 0,5 1,1 3,0 11,6Sources: AfDB Statistics Department Databases; World Bank: World Development Indicators;
last update: UNAIDS; UNSD; WHO, UNICEF, UNDP; Country Reports.
Note n.a: Not Applicable;
...: Data Not Available
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2000 2005 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Senegal Africa
Infant Mortality Rate (Per 1000)
Photo: Debazou Yantio
The Gambia forms an enclave within the country along the Gambia River. Three cross-border road corridors and structures to the Gambia, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau and Mali were completed. They have improved connectivity with neighboring countries and helped to increase the volume of trade with these countries between 2009 and 2013.
102 Senegal: Evaluation of the Bank's Country Strategy and Program 2004–2013 Summary Report
Endnotes
1. This was the year following the establishment of ORQR (2008) during which project completion reports became more frequent and comprehensive.
2. Detailed description in Annex 1.
3. For the relevance, effectiveness and efficiency criteria, the scale is as follows: 1=highly unsatisfactory; 2=unsatisfactory; 3=moderately unsatisfactory; 4=moderately satisfactory; 5=satisfactory; 6=highly satisfactory. For sustainability it is as follows: 1=highly improbable; 2=improbable; 3=fairly improbable; 4=fairly probable; 5=probable; 6=highly probable.
4. Mouhamadou Bamba DIOP. What sectors for what type of economic growth in Senegal? DPEE
5. Senegal. Emerging Senegal Plan-Transport Infrastructure, Technical Thematic Note
6. Senegal. Poverty Monitoring Survey in Senegal, 2005-2006 and 2011
7. Senegal Emerging Senegal Plan-Transport Infrastructure, Thematic Technical Note
8. PRSP II: Priority action levers
9. The theories of change developed from the results of the evaluation of the various sectors are presented in Annexes 29 to 34.
10. DPS The informal sector in the Dakar conurbation, Phase 2 of the 2003 1-2-3 survey, June 2004)
11. Mott MacDonald. 2015. Patte d’Oie-Diamniadio Toll Motorway, Quarterly Operating Report of the second half of 2014, February 2015
12. Department of Land Transport. 2007. Study on the Operating Costs and Conditions of Public Transport Passenger Vehicles in Senegal for optimal tariffing, September 2007
13. ESTA database, 2014
14. 2014 Ibrahim Index of African Governance (IIAG) Data Portal, accessible at http://www.moibrahimfoundation.org/downloads/publications/2014/2014-iiag-data-portal.xlsm
15. Doing Business 2016, World Bank Group
16. PAPIL PCR
17. Anti-salt dikes, water retention and control structures, island breakwaters, wetland and irrigation development works and the construction of farm-to-market roads
18. Modeling of climate change in Senegal
19. The online database of the National Local Development Program (PNDL) covers 14 958 villages in Senegal, consulted on 22 September 2015 at http://www.pndl.org/Repertoire-des-villages-du-Senegal.html. The Senegal on-line tourist guide indicates 13 544 villages (http://www.senegal-online.com/tourisme_au_senegal/villes-et-villages-du-senegal/).
20. SENELEC: 2011-2013 SENELEC activity report/ revision of tariff conditions in March 2013
21. Study Report: Senegal faced with the global energy crisis: the emergence challenges of the biofuel sub-sector / Isra-Bame, November 2009
22. AfDB. 2010. Senegal: Country Strategy Paper (CSP) 2010-2015, Annex 1, p. 26
23. COWI Denmark, 2005. Denmark, quoted by the General Economic and Financial Council and the Civil Engineering General Council in its 'Report on the comparison at European Level of road construction, maintenance and operating costs in 2006;
24. Africon. 2008. Unit Costs of Infrastructure Projects in Sub-Saharan Africa, June 2008
25. IFAD. 2014. Republic of Senegal: Country Program Evaluation, Report No. 3317-SN
26. Dissertation by El Hadji Diakhaté, Senior Financial Expert -CRSE
27. Study Report: Senegal faced with the global energy crisis: the emergence challenges of the biofuel sub-sector / Isra-Bame, November 2009
28. Project Performance Evaluation Report (PPER). Dakar Sanitation Project (PAVD). May 2012
29. Health Project II PCR
30. Emerging Senegal Plan – Transport Infrastructure, Technical Thematic Note
103Annexes
An ID
EV C
ount
ry S
trat
egy
Eval
uatio
n
31. Electricity Sector Regulatory Commission (CRSE). 2010. Senegal's Energy Information System, Report by the Ministry of International Cooperation, Air Transport, Infrastructure and Energy
32. CRSE: Audit of Security of Electric Power Supply in Senegal / July 2005
33. ANSD: Analytical Note on External Trade- 2010 and 2013 Editions
34. Observatory of Abnormal Practices (OPA), Presentation of OPA Project and Main Results – March 2013
35. DP World Dakar Statistics 2010-2013; DCT Expanded Supervision Report, 2013
36. Mott MacDonald. 2015. Patte d’Oie-Diamniadio Toll Motorway, Quarterly Operating Report of the second half of 2014, February 2015
37. Ministry of the Interior, Local Government and Decentralization. 2009. Completion Report. National Local Development Program (PNDL), Community Roads Project (PPC)
38. Ministry of the Interior, Local Government and Decentralization. 2010. Capitalization on experience and assessment of socio-economic impacts. National Local Development Program (PNDL), Community Roads Project (PPC)
39. AfDB. 2014. Bank Group Country Strategy papers: Principles, Processes and Annotated Format. Document no. ADB/BD/WP/2014/73
40. AfDB. 2015. Republic of Senegal - Combined 2010-2015 Completion Report and 2015 Country Portfolio Performance Review, Document ADB/BD/WP/2015/XX, Annex 2, Table 2.2
41. Combined 2010-2015CSP Mid-Term Review and 2012 Country Portfolio Performance Review
42. Ministry of Economy and Finance, 2014. Development Cooperation Report (DCR): For cooperation commensurate with Senegal's development ambitions. p. 13, Dakar, Senegal
43. SAP Data, August 2014
44. Ministry of Economy and Finance, 2014. Development Cooperation Report (DCR): For cooperation commensurate with Senegal's development ambitions. p. 13, Dakar, Senegal
45. Approved: Project approved by the Board which is not yet effective for first disbursement; Ongoing: Project being implemented. Are considered as being implemented: (a) projects which are effective and where the Borrower has fulfilled the conditions precedent to first disbursement or (b) physically completed projects (activities planned at appraisal and reviewed during the Mid-Term Review which have been implemented) the loans for which still have undrawn balances and for which a completion report has not been prepared; Cancelled: Project whose implementation is suspended before completion of the planned activities. The following will be considered in this category: (a) Projects approved and cancelled before signature of the loan agreements; (b) Projects for which the loan agreements are signed and then cancelled without disbursements; (c) projects for which loans are partly disbursed then the undrawn balances cancelled before implementation of the activities originally planned in the appraisal report and possibly revised during the Mid-Term Review; Completed: Completed project most of whose activities planned at appraisal have been implemented and have been the subject of a Bank completion report. Physically completed projects whose loans/grants are fully disbursed may be added to this category even if the completion report has not yet been prepared; Closed: Projects fully implemented with finalized PCR.
Despite the delays, about 200 structures and other infrastructure have been completed under the Local Small-Scale Irrigation Support Program funded by the Bank in Fatick, Kedougou, Kolda, Kaolack, and Tambacounda. These facilities have helped to recover 3,263 ha of salty land, restore 1,159 hectares of land, reforest 1,083 hectares of land, regenerate 90.75 ha of mangrove swamps, and protect 4 out of 5 island sites.
Independent Development EvaluationAfrican Development Bank
idev.afdb.org
Des
ign
& la
yout
: CR
ÉON
• w
ww
.cre
onde
sign
.net
About this Evaluation
This evaluation measures the relevance, effectiveness, efficiency and sustainability of the AfDB Group assistance to Senegal over the period 2004-2013. It also draws relevant lessons to help improve implementation of the Bank's 2016 - 2020 Country Strategy Paper (CSP) for Senegal.
Between 2004 and 2013, the Bank approved 32 operations, amounting to about UA 525.9 million, in six priority sectors: transport (38%), public sector or governance reform (20%), agriculture and rural development (15%), electric power (12%), water and sanitation (11%) and social development (4%) in women's and youth employment.
Overall, the Bank has successfully aligned its operational program with the Senegalese government's development policy priorities and the expectations of the population and economic agents, however, it lacks selectivity.
Specifically, on effectiveness, this evaluation rates the AfDB program and strategies in Senegal as moderately satisfactory. Sector performances are variable. Most of the physical outputs have been achieved. However, these outputs have not always been translated into development outcomes. Efficiency is moderately unsatisfactory mainly as a result of slippage on implementation and cost overruns or underruns. Sustainability is fairly probable. The communities have assumed ownership of the assets in certain sectors. However, there are still problems regarding mobilization of the infrastructure maintenance budget, as well as poor operating conditions of the structures and training on the use of equipment.
Based on these findings, this evaluation formulates practical and relevant recommendations to improve future programs and strategies: (a) strengthen the Bank's strategic positioning, (b) ensure the sustainability of infrastructures, and (c) improve the effectiveness of project/program supervision.
An IDEV Country Strategy Evaluation
African Development Bank GroupAvenue Joseph Anoma 01 BP 1387, Abidjan 01 Côte d’IvoirePhone: +225 20 26 20 41 • Fax: +225 20 21 31 00Email: [email protected]