SESSION 1
Setting the Scene
Presented by David Boswarthick of ETSI
Standardized framework for interoperable M2M Services. 24th – 25th October 2012
© ETSI 2012. All rights reserved
Highlights from the presentations (1 of 4)
Enrico Scarrone of Telecom Italia gave an overview of how
standards will enable the global M2M solution.
He kindly likened ETSI to the wizard of M2M standardization and
provided an introduction of how TC M2M have adopted an open
approach to standardization and encouraged cooperation with other approach to standardization and encouraged cooperation with other
bodies such as BBF, OMA , HGI and the SDOs.
He summarised that timely and global standardization is a key enabler
to remove the technical barriers and ensure interoperable M2M
services and networks
He also provided an overview of the work we are doing in ETSI M2M
and touched upon the plan for transfer and evolution towards
oneM2M.
2 © ETSI 2012. All rights reserved
Highlights from the presentations (2 of 4)
Joachim Koss of Cinterion presented the new oneM2M
Partnership Project which sees 7 SDOs from Asia, EU, and North
America coming together to produce globally applicable,
access-independent M2M service layer specifications.
It is hoped the work of oneM2M will:-It is hoped the work of oneM2M will:-
• Boost M2M economies of scale by shortening time-to-market,
• Simplify development of applications,
• Leverage the worldwide network for enhanced potential of services and
to expand business opportunities,
• Reduce standardization overlap by provide ongoing standards support,
• Increase the ability of solutions and produces to interoperate.
3 © ETSI 2012. All rights reserved
Highlights from the presentations (3 of 4)
Katharina & Katja of Swisscom explained how M2M business
models should be build in a customer centric manner.
“In IoT the value proposition is not primarily about physical products and
not even about services, it‘s mostly about experiences and feelings”.
They also provided insight from the EU-Project
M2M business should be optimized through the use of
partnerships as no one company is big enough to go it alone.
Also deployment costs may be reduced through the use of
open standards allowing for interoperable and future proof
solutions from multiple vendors and working with different
partners.
4 © ETSI 2012. All rights reserved
Highlights from the presentations (4 of 4)
Milan Zoric of ETSI CTI provide an overview of the 13 live
demos involving 28 companies that have been on display
throughout the workshop.
(See later slides)
5 © ETSI 2012. All rights reserved
Possible way forward
Encourage standardisation effort in oneM2M in order to avoid
overlap and standards fragmentation
Encourage liaison between standards groups to ensure
harmonised collection and definition of use cases for M2M.
Operators need to consider the user when defining services Operators need to consider the user when defining services
with a user centric approach,
Encouraging user and consumers to provide feedback on early
deployment of M2M services.
Proactive marketing of the M2M services to the end user to
encourage positive reception and take-up.
Improved cooperation between R&D projects and
Standardization is needed.
6 © ETSI 2012. All rights reserved
M2M INTEROPERABILITY DEMONSTRATIONS
Wrap up session
Presented by Milan Zoric for M2M Workshop, Mandelieu, October 2012
This year the event has attracted
13 comprehensive interoperability demos
involving 28 companies
8 M2M Workshop © ETSI 2012. All rights reserved
Main message from
interoperability demonstrations
Demos attracted many of the Workshop
participants, very positive feedback
Both visitors and presenters were highly
pleased with the questions & interactions
Several examples of new implementations Several examples of new implementations
of the ETSI M2M architecture
Implementations are approaching Release
1 to somewhere towards Release 2
New examples from various vertical
domains
Some talk of interconnect trails and testing
around the demos
9 M2M Workshop © ETSI 2011. All rights reserved
Future evolution
Looking forward to having an even bigger set
of demos in the next M2M related event(s)
next year
Looking forward to further Interoperability
testing eventstesting events
• Second IoT CoAP Plugtests, 28th -30th November 2012
in Sophia Antipolis, France, with additional test cases
including basic ETSI M2M CoAP binding tests
• Other M2M related events ?
Consultations and discussions on M2M
testing issues will proceed in ETSI M2M and
oneM2M
10 M2M Workshop © ETSI 2011. All rights reserved
SESSION 2
The ETSI M2M STANDARD
Presented by Patricia MARTIGNE
Standardized framework for interoperable M2M Services. 24th – 25th October 2012
© ETSI 2012. All rights reserved
ETSI M2M architecture introduction• Some clues to understand ETSI M2M Rel 1
• Main features for Release 2: Interworking with 3GPP; M2M Information Recording; Charging architecture; Few enhancements like the communication channel used for arbitrary requests to a Gateway behind a NAT
M2M Security standards: ETSI contributions
Highlights from the presentations
M2M Security standards: ETSI contributions• Security Thread analysis reports provided by ETSI TCs
• What Security variants are specified by ETSI M2M
Next steps for M2M standards: Abstraction & semantics• Needs for abstraction and semantics as enablers for the M2M market to move from
siloed environment to convergent services
• Industry expects SDOs to provide standardized solutions (e.g. French AGORA of home networking)
• SDOs are aiming to harmonize with each other (e.g. BBF, ETSI M2M, HGI, OSGI, OMA..)
• oneM2M, claiming end-to-end aspects of standardization, could play a coordinating role, while explicitly keeping out of the specifics of individual industry segments.
Security raises the question of liability in case of a failure in
delivering the expected service; these concerns are discussed
for example at European Commissions experts group for
Smart Grid.
Distinction between Abstraction and semantics needs to be
Issues raised & Questions
Distinction between Abstraction and semantics needs to be
described so that all SDOs understand their roles on each of
both items
How the M2M platform will have to support Semantics
For semantics we can learn a lot from Semantic Web; to see
how to adapt it to M2M…
Maturity of ETSI M2M Release 1,
• can be easily implemented (implementations showed in the Demo-Room)
• next steps include
• Finalization of Release2 for additional major features
• Proposal to begin the work on a conformance specification to allow checking the
conformance of the products implementing ETSI M2M specification
Semantics is a key piece needed that is missing in the current Release
Possible way forward
Semantics is a key piece needed that is missing in the current Release
• To go beyond the current ETSI M2M work item on a semantics Technical
Report
• By drafting a Technical Specification that will be transfered to OneM2M when
appropriate (depending on next bullet action adoption)
• To have a WG dedicated to Abstraction/Semantics in OneM2M that will take
care of the continuation of this work
• Immediate step: Creation of a mailing list for exhanging ideas about the main
concepts we want to seal with under this fascinating and federating
Abstraction/Semantics subject
SESSION 3
Implementing ETSI M2M
Presented by Omar Elloumi
Standardized framework for interoperable M2M Services. 24th – 25th October 2012
© ETSI 2012. All rights reserved
Highlights from the presentations
Standards developments are
converging nicely together:
• CoAP, 6lowpan, ETSI M2M, OMA DM, BBF
TR069, OSGi, etc. and the ZigBee, KNX,
etc.
ETSI M2M framework provides a solid ETSI M2M framework provides a solid
foundation to Smart home and Smart
Grid requirements:
• network agnostic, synch/asynch comms.,
subscribe/notify, REST API, security, etc.
16 © ETSI 2012. All rights reserved
Issues raised & Questions
Technology wise: we have all we need to address most (if not
all) M2M markets
But:
• We still have a long way to go to convince about the value proposition
(tutorials; best practices; reference implementation; etc)(tutorials; best practices; reference implementation; etc)
• Improve interoperability
• Fill-in the remaining gaps: Abstraction and Semantics
• Need to make application development easier and simpler for
application developer who shall not know about ETSI M2M
For further discussion:
• SDK vs. “plain REST API”
• Role of gateway
• Role of the M2M platform vs. Applications in abstraction/semantics
17 © ETSI 2012. All rights reserved
Possible way forward
ETSI M2MoneM2M
INTEROPERABILITY
Approach TBDReference implementation
EDUCATION AND PROMOTION
18 © ETSI 2012. All rights reserved
oneM2MOMABBF
IPSO/IETF(not exhaustive)
STANDARDS / TECHNOLOGY NEXT STEPS
Keep the API simple! Application developers do not need to know about ETSIAbstraction and SemanticsFurther study/clarify the role of the gateway
Tutorials, Best practices, Implementation guidelinesReal world tangible examples, Better use case documents
SESSION 4
On INDUSTRY SECTORS
Presented by Joachim Koss
Standardized framework for interoperable M2M Services. 24th – 25th October 2012
© ETSI 2012. All rights reserved
Highlights from the presentations
SMCG Report on Use Cases handover to EC in December
European approach for defining security requirements based
on Use Cases
• Risk analysis per Use Case
• Defining security levels and requirements per data asset per zone• Defining security levels and requirements per data asset per zone
Define a European reference set of P&S Requirements for
Smart Metering and a certification approach
Increasing need for M2M Security / Privacy in more and more
M2M segments (e.g. Smart Energy, Governmental IT,
Telematic / Health, Car industry)
Critical infrastructure protection e.g. Smart Grid
20 © ETSI 2012. All rights reserved
Highlights from the presentations
Key to unlocking the potential lies in scalable, interoperable,
secure solutions which enable robust evolvement of the
Smart Grid
Road traffic assistance based on 3GPP cellular technology and
cloudified services raise special challenges: real time aspects, cloudified services raise special challenges: real time aspects,
system performance and scalability
Scalibility also in sense of adding new applications in the
traffic system, saving costs by
• reuseing infrastructure and
• simplifying SW engineering
21 © ETSI 2012. All rights reserved
Issues raised & Questions
SM/SG: security level of general ICT COTS certified products
needs to be raised, therefore the level of standardization has
to be increased by building Technical Communities (TC)
developing collaborative Protection Profiles (“cPPs”)
Q: Which SDO to support the initiative?Q: Which SDO to support the initiative?
Horizontal approaches in standardization:
Every link in the chain must be secure from physical device to
backend server (end-to-end)
22 © ETSI 2012. All rights reserved
Possible way forward
Evalution of opportunities for co-operation between ESMIG
Technical Community (TC) initiative, and ETSI/oneM2M on
Security Certification involving certification bodies and
governments
Support complex queries in traffic system as traffic jam Support complex queries in traffic system as traffic jam
detection
23 © ETSI 2012. All rights reserved
SESSION 5
On M2M TECHNOLOGIES
Presented by Joerg Swetina (NEC)
Standardized framework for interoperable M2M Services. 24th – 25th October 2012
© ETSI 2012. All rights reserved
Highlights from the presentations
Steven Leussink, (Dialog) ETSI M2M and DECT ULE
• DECT ULE = Ultra-low energy technology to combine Wireless Sensors
and Voice. ULE mode is add-on, keeps assets of DECT (> 800M devices)
• DECT ULE phase 1 ETSI standard release mid Dec 2012
Philippe Cousin, (EAR-IT) The sound of smart environments
• Advantages of Acoustic sensing: Non Line-of-Sight, Multipurpose..• Advantages of Acoustic sensing: Non Line-of-Sight, Multipurpose..
• Services: Noise monitoring, Traffic flow surveillance, event detection,
localization of outstanding events
• EAR-IT Research Experiment Approach
Yuichi Morioka, (Sony) Low cost LTE for M2M consumer
electronics
• current study in 3GPP on creating a lower cost version of LTE
• For Consumer Electronics critical: cost, mobility, security
• Approach: Reduce bandwidth and transmit power, simplify hardware25 © ETSI 2012. All rights reserved
Issues raised & Questions
Q: DECT seems to compete with 6LoWPAN (already available)
• A: Similar capabilities, but DECT has already 800 M devices working
• Comment: Interworking specification already under construction
Q: How about the costs of audio detecting devices?
• A: High capability devices (analyzing sound) may be expensive but • A: High capability devices (analyzing sound) may be expensive but
‘intelligence’ could be moved into the gateway
Q: Can e.g. a gun-shot be detected (for public safety)? A: Yes
Q: Low Cost LTE devices available 2017. Why not using GSM?
• A: GSM may disappear. Longevity of solutions cannot be guaranteed.
• Comment: UTRAN may serve as M2M technology too.
Comment: Low Cost LTE will benefit from device-to-device
[LTE] communication currently studied in 3GPP
26 © ETSI 2012. All rights reserved
Possible way forward
New and differentiated technologies that are useful for M2M
will gradually appear in standards and markets.
• They will find their place in the markets based on supported features
and price (e.g. long-lasting devices can already be found today, but the
price may be too high for a certain service)
Emerging technologies will need to interwork with existing Emerging technologies will need to interwork with existing
and future standards (interconnect to M2M systems)
� SDOs and fora who are developing these technologies should try to
collaborate with leading M2M standards (ETSI M2M, oneM2M)
�similar technologies might create the need for “Abstraction Layers” in
a global M2M system
� Organization of work: ETSI ISGs (Industry Specification Groups) may
be a good opportunity for doing specification work on emerging
technologies with the professional support of ETSI.
27 © ETSI 2012. All rights reserved
SESSION 6
LOOKING FORWARD (to M2M)
Presented by Marylin ARNDT, Orange, ETSI M2M vice-chair
Standardized framework for interoperable M2M Services. 24th – 25th October 2012
© ETSI 2012. All rights reserved
Presentations in session 6
• The Vigisanté health projects and matters of importance for
M2M applications,
Nicolas Damour, Sierra Wireless
• Clouds as enablers for M2M service provisioning, • Clouds as enablers for M2M service provisioning,
Monique Morrow, Cisco
• Adding virtualisation functionalities to M2M architecture,
Theodore Zahariadis, TEIHAL
© ETSI 2012. All rights reserved29
Take away topics
Highlights :
• common points : R&D projects presenting key issues and challenges
to be addressed by innovation, by industry and by the
standardization bodies, with focus on :
• example of a vertical application with strong requirements : e-
Health / GridHealth / Grid
• how a generic architecture can cope with vertical requirements
• need of abstraction
• need of security, data and privacy protection
• impact of cloud computing as an enabler
• heterogeneity of networks and devices
• complexity management and “make it simple” need.
• Convergence of telecom / ICT : SDOs : IEEE, ITU-T, IETF.
30 © ETSI 2012. All rights reserved
Issues raised & Questions
Main key issues :
• security, liability, privacy, regulated environments
Technical challenges
• security, massive data, M2M and cloud enabler,
provisioning, provisioning,
• virtualization, heterogeneous architectures management
Questions :
• What about security and privacy? (they are not exactly the same)
• how to manage the 2 “elephants” in the congress room :
• Network reliability for Cloud
• Trust in the data storage,
and the lifecycle of data ownership.
31 © ETSI 2012. All rights reserved
The (only) way forward
Work Together !
32 © ETSI 2012. All rights reserved
SESSION 7
Synergies
Introduced by Enrico Scarrone, Telecom Italia, ETSI TC M2M Chairman
Standardized framework for interoperable M2M Services. 24th – 25th October 2012
© ETSI 2012. All rights reserved
Highlights from the presentations (1 of 4)
Duncan Bees CTO and CBO of Home Gateway Initiative
gave an overview of the current work in HGI.
The need for a Smart Home Ecosystem was highlighted
together with the HGI strategy to achieve it
• development of the environment
• APIs/reference points • APIs/reference points
• Device representation with appropriate abstraction
A description of the HGI architecture and current ongong
Activity was given
The need for Cross-SDO collaboration to define device
representation and abstraction and to unify the smart
home ecosystem
34 © ETSI 2012. All rights reserved
Highlights from the presentations (2 of 4)
Robin Mersh, CEO of Broadband Forum gave an overview of
the main M2M related works in BBF.
Management Plane:
• Data models for ETSI M2M Release 1.0.
• Evolution of M2M networks and paradigms for TR 069• Evolution of M2M networks and paradigms for TR 069
• Work drawing to a conclusion
Control Signaling and Device Abstraction to M2M devices:
• key enabler to service delivery to provide connectivity to growing
ecosystem of devices.
• Cooperation and liaisons with other bodies essential, including ETSI
M2M and potentially finding a common arena for agreements in
oneM2M
35 © ETSI 2012. All rights reserved
Highlights from the presentations (3 of 4)
Toon Norp of TNO, M2M rapporteur in 3GPP gave an
overview of the current work on System Improvement for
Machine Type Communication.
The M2M Mobile devices expected grow has been
highlighted, focalizing the attention on a set of new highlighted, focalizing the attention on a set of new
functionality supported by the 3GPP mobile networks, among
others:
• Protection against overload by MTC
• Overload and congestion control
• New interface for M2M control
• External identifier
• Triggering
• Group based triggering
• Small data transfer and frequent small data
36 © ETSI 2012. All rights reserved
M2M Devices and Applications are already relying on OMA
DM, but specific M2M challenges are under study.
• Evolving heterogeneous networks supporting M2M devices
Highlights from the presentations (4 of 4)
Salvatore Scarpina of Telecom Italia, Vice Chair of the Open
Mobile Alliance DM, gave an overview of the current work on
OMA Device Management.
• Evolving heterogeneous networks supporting M2M devices
• Provisioning and Management of constrained devices through
constrained connectivity
• Support of M2M devices through a Gateway
• Support of M2M devices acting as a Gateway
Good collaboration took place with ETSI TC M2M regarding
existing technology
OMA is developing a new strategy to provide concrete
contributions to the oneM2M framework37 © ETSI 2012. All rights reserved
Highlight
Major SDOs are already collaborating among them
Device abstraction and modelling is a very high priority
We seek for synergies and complementary solutions rather
then for competition
oneM2M is the arena where this collaboration could be oneM2M is the arena where this collaboration could be
finalized, respecting the autonomy and the competence of
each SDO
M2M system are complex,
there so much work to be done that
collaboration is a must!!!
38 © ETSI 2012. All rights reserved
Possible way forward (1)
Revenue balance M2M small data makes less profit, need low cost apps
Move specification work to the one M2M Partnership
• Boost M2M economies of scale by shortening time-to-market
• Worldwide potential services and business opportunities
• Reduce standardization overlap and provide ongoing standards support
• Semantics is a key piece needed that is missing in the Release 1
Security & PrivacySecurity & Privacy
• Secure data and Identity privacy
• Optimized security management
• Cost of loss / risk of theft vs. the cost of implementing high security
Making the Standard well known & accessible
• INTEROPERABILITY
• Increase the ability of solutions and products to interoperate
• EDUCATION AND PROMOTION
• Tutorials, Best practices, Implementation guidelines
• Real world tangible examples, Better use case documents39 © ETSI 2012. All rights reserved
Possible way forward (2)
Making the APIs open to implementers on device apps
• STANDARDS / TECHNOLOGY NEXT STEPS
• Keep the API simple!
• Application developers do not need to know about ETSI
• Abstraction and Semantics
• Further study/clarify the role of the gateway
TechnologiesTechnologies
• Choice of lower Layer technologies for M2M devices
• DECT Low power vs. LTE low cost
• Wake up time of the packet transmission
• LTE low latency – needed for road traffic collision avoidance & critical smart
grid applications
• 2G Continuation or Legacy / 3G Middle Ground / 4G cost reduction
Synergies
• HGI Connecting Homes + Enabling Services
• BBF & OMA defining Device Management, interoperability & abstraction
40 © ETSI 2012. All rights reserved
Only way forward
Work Together !
41 © ETSI 2012. All rights reserved
SESSION 8
WRAP UP AND OPEN DISCUSSIONPresented by Ray Forbes, ETSI TC M2M WG3 Chair, Telefon AB LM Ericsson
Standardized framework for interoperable M2M Services. 24th – 25th October 2012
© ETSI 2012. All rights reserved
Possible way forward (1)
Revenue balance M2M small data makes less profit, need low cost apps
Move specification work to the one M2M Partnership
• Boost M2M economies of scale by shortening time-to-market
• Worldwide potential services and business opportunities
• Reduce standardization overlap and provide ongoing standards support
• Semantics is a key piece needed that is missing in the Release 1
Security & PrivacySecurity & Privacy
• Secure data and Identity privacy
• Optimized security management
• Cost of loss / risk of theft vs. the cost of implementing high security
Making the Standard well known & accessible
• INTEROPERABILITY
• Increase the ability of solutions and products to interoperate
• EDUCATION AND PROMOTION
• Tutorials, Best practices, Implementation guidelines
• Real world tangible examples, Better use case documents43 © ETSI 2012. All rights reserved
Possible way forward (2)
Making the APIs open to implementers on device apps
• STANDARDS / TECHNOLOGY NEXT STEPS
• Keep the API simple!
• Application developers do not need to know about ETSI
• Abstraction and Semantics
• Further study/clarify the role of the gateway
TechnologiesTechnologies
• Choice of lower Layer technologies for M2M devices
• DECT Low power vs. LTE low cost
• Wake up time of the packet transmission
• LTE low latency – needed for road traffic collision avoidance & critical smart
grid applications
• 2G Continuation or Legacy / 3G Middle Ground / 4G cost reduction
Synergies
• HGI Connecting Homes + Enabling Services
• BBF & OMA defining Device Management, interoperability & abstraction
44 © ETSI 2012. All rights reserved
Only way forward
Work Together !
45 © ETSI 2012. All rights reserved