Untangling child welfare disparities: Adoption outcomes for Black
children with disabilities
Elspeth Slayter, Ph.D.School of Social Work Salem State College
July 16, 20092nd National Conference on
Child and Family Programs and Policy
Slayer 1
Adoption in 2003…
Slayer 2Slayter
Disparate adoption outcomes
• Race and ethnicity– Multiethnic Placement Act,
1994, 1996
• Age– Older children
• Gender– Boys and young men
• Disability– “Special needs”– Subsidies
Slayer 3
Slayer 4Slayter
Guiding conceptual framework: Intersectionality
• Kimberlee Crenshaw • Multiplicity of oppression• Axes of difference
• Complex interactions impact reality
• Interconnectivity in producing/perpetuating systems of oppression
• Potential for interconnectivity in adoption from foster care
• Age x gender x race x disability?
Slayer 5
Group comparisons
Slayer 6
Research questions
Slayer 7
Slayer 8
Sample and comparison groups
Slayer 9
Definitions of disability
Slayer 10
Aim 1: Age and gender
Age:• Black youth with
disabilities - older than non-Black counterparts (7 ½ vs. 7, t=3.86***)
Gender: • Hypotheses not supported• Black youth with
disabilities – more likely to be male than non-Black counterparts (55% vs. 53%, OR=1.1*)
Slayer 11
Aim 1: Types of disability
Multiple disability: – Black vs. non-
Black youth with disabilities almost 2 times more likely (1.4% vs. 0.8%, OR=1.65**)
‘Mental retardation’:• Less likely among Black
vs. non-Black youth with disabilities (9.4% vs. 12.1%, OR=0.75***)
• More likely among Black boys with disabilities (9.7% vs. 9.0%, OR=1.03***)
Slayer 12
Aim 1: Diagnosis of ‘emotionally disturbed’
• Black vs. non-Black youth with disabilities 27% less likely (38% vs. 44%, OR=0.73***)
• Black youth with vs. without disabilities 36.4 times more likely (38% vs. 2%, OR=36.4***)
– Black boys with disabililties 17% less likely than Black girls with disabilities (37% vs. 40%, OR=0.83**)
Slayer 13
Aim 2: Time between termination of parental rights and adoption
Group comparison Mean (Standard deviation) t
All Black youthAll Non-Black youth
1.98 (0.02)1.41 (0.01)
t=21.2***
All Black boys All Black girls
2.37 (0.26)1.60 (0.02)
t=4.0***
Youth with disabilitiesYouth without disabilities
1.81 (0.02)1.60 (0.01)
t=7.70***
Black youth with disabilitiesNon-Black youth with disabilities
1.87 (0.29)1.63(0.01)
t=12.7***
Black youth with disabilitiesBlack youth without disabilities
1.91 (0.03)2.06 (0.02)
t=4.1***
Black boys with disabilitiesBlack girls with disabilities
1.91 (0.04)1.90 (0.05)
NSSlayer 14
Aim 3: Adoptive family structure
• Black vs. non-Black youth with disabilities 3.4 times more likely adopted by single, vs.
two-parent families (33% vs. 15%, OR=3.40***)
• Black youth with vs. without disabilities 35% less likely to be adopted by single parents (33% vs. 47%, OR=0.65***)
– Black boys vs. girls 23% less likely (30% vs. 36%, OR=0.77***)
Slayer 15
Aim 3: Black adoptive families
• Mixed support for hypothesis
• Black vs. non-Black youth with disabilities 54 times more likely (53% vs. 2%, OR=54.4***)
• Black youth with disabilities vs. without 46% less likely (53% vs. 72%, OR=0.54***)
– Black boys vs. girls with disabilities 18% less likely (50% vs. 55%, OR=0.82**)
Slayer 16
Aim 3: Pre-adoptive relationship
• Kin: Mixed support for hypothesis– Black youth with vs. without disabilities 43% less
likely (12% vs. 20%, OR=0.57***)
• Foster parent: 13%-22% less likely
• Non-relative, non-foster parent: – Black vs. non-Black youth with disabilities 3 times
more likely (33% vs. 15%, OR=2.77***)
– Black youth with vs. without disabilities 1.3 times more likely (17% vs. 12%, OR=1.32***)
Slayer 17
Aim 3: Post-adoption funding
• Black vs. non-Black youth with disabilities more likely to receive any Federal or state subsidy (93% vs. 91%, OR=1.30***)
• Receive equal $ state subsidies compared to non-Black youth with disabilities in most states ($1,452 vs. $1,001, t=4.09***)
Slayer 18
Aim 3: Post-adoption funding
• Black youth with vs. without disabilities 2 times more likely to receive subsidy (93% vs.87%, OR=1.97***)
• Receive larger $ subsidies than Black youth without disabilities ($1,452 vs. $1,001, t=4.09***)
– No gender differences among Black youth with disabilities
Slayer 19
DiscussionCharacteristics
• Equal proportions of adoptees by gender – role of subsidy?
• Need to understand who is left behind
Waiting time
• Disparities among youth with disabilities
• Within group gender effect
• Role of subsidy in shorter waiting time among Black youth?
Slayer 20
DiscussionAdoptive families
• MEPA after-effects?
• Black single parents more likely to adopt?
• Kin findings mirror guardianship trends - any disability stigma?
• Post-adoption supports
Subsidy
• Few apparent disparities– State-specific issues?
• Promise of subsidies for all children?
Slayer 21
Slayer
Future research• Which Black foster children with disabilities
remain in foster care awaiting adoption?– More disabled? Older at removal? Sibling groups?
• Role of subsidies in decision-making?– Existing research suggests subsidy as commodity in
divorce proceedings– Possible racial disparities in subsidy disbursement in
some states?
22
Slayer
Acknowledgements
• Sheron Adair, MSW & Evenns Semerzier, MSW, Graduate Research Assistants
• National Data Archive on Child Abuse and Neglect (NDACAN)– Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System
(Children’s Bureau)– NDACAN, Cornell University and their agents or employees
bear no responsibility for these analyses or interpretations
23
Slayer
Removal from family (imminent risk of abuse, neglect)
Return to family within 22 months with concurrent
planning
Work toward reunification (in most cases)
Initiation of termination of parental rights proceedings after 15/22
months
Parental rights terminated
AdoptedLT foster care or waiting for adoption
Federal Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1996 (ASFA)
*Safety
*Permanency
*Well-being
Federal, state-specific subsidies, programs, resources
24
Recommended