7/29/2019 Sola Scriptura in the Early Church
1/21
LIBERTY BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY
SOLA SCIPTURA: THE ONLY VIEW FOR THE EARLY
CHURCH
A RESEARCH PAPER SUBMITTED TO:
PROFESSOR TAE JUN SUK
IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENT FOR
THE COURSE CHURCH HISTORY 520
BY
JONATHAN E. HARRIS
WAPPINGERS FALLS, NY
MARCH 2013
7/29/2019 Sola Scriptura in the Early Church
2/21
7/29/2019 Sola Scriptura in the Early Church
3/21
iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Preface............................................................................................................................................iv
Abstract............................................................................................................................................v
Definitions........................................................................................................................................1
The Process of Canonization........................................................................................................1-7
What The Bible Says About Itself................................................................................................7-9
The Church Fathers Speak..........................................................................................................9-14
Conclusion.....................................................................................................................................14
7/29/2019 Sola Scriptura in the Early Church
4/21
iv
PREFACE
In an age of rampant skepticism and misinformation concerning the origin of the Bible, it is of
vital importance for the church to understand not only the process of canonization, but the early
churchs view on the authenticity of the books canonized. There is no doubt that any believer
who interacts on any level in the world today will sooner or later be asked the question, Where
did we get the Bible? The modern assumption held by most individuals as a result of pop-fiction
and modern academia is that the church itself simply chose through councils to arbitrarily
compile the books we know today as the Old and New Testaments. This of course destroys the
authenticity of the foundation of Christianity itself, making it equivalent to every other man-
made deviation, and therefore subject to the nefarious nature of men of ill character. It is a little
more than ironic that the stalwarts of the Christian faith in the early church (the very group of
men accused of tampering and/or choosing the text of Scripture) were the very ones opposing
this viewpoint and instead pointing to what has come to be known since the reformation assola
sciptura. This work is dedicated to vindicating the doctrine for which they stood thereby arming
the modern Christian with an answer for those who would harbor such faulty assumptions in
asking any question concerning the sacred canon.
7/29/2019 Sola Scriptura in the Early Church
5/21
v
ABSTRACT
It is a fact that the canon of Scripture was not determined authoritative by a more authoritative
establishmentnamely the churchbut was confirmed by the church as an entity already
possessing supreme authority over the institution that verified its reliability. The Scriptures, in
their original characteristic, are not made a standard by any humanly devised system of veracity,
but are in judgment themselves over any such system. Therefore, the Scriptures are self-
confirming and have been treated as such by Christians universally, including the Christians of
the early and patristic periodsthe periods of time directly after which the canon was complete.
It is my aim to prove, using historical evidence, that the early and patristic church believed in a
self-confirming and authoritative canon that they themselves sat in judgment under. The early
church believed insola scriptura.
7/29/2019 Sola Scriptura in the Early Church
6/21
P. Flint and J. VanderKam. The Meaning o f the Dead Sea Scrolls: Their Significance For Und erstanding1
the Bible, Judaism, Jesus, and Christianity. (Bloomsbury, 2005.) 155.
Gal 6:16 NASB2
Flint and Vanderkam, The Meaning of the Dead Sea Scrolls, 156.3
Brighenti et al. The Catholicism Answer Book: The 300 Most Frequently Asked Questions. (Sourcebooks,4
Incorporated, 2007.) 37.
1
DEFINITIONS
In order to be clear about the subject at hand we must first establish what is meant by
the terms that will be used. There are certain words commonly thrown around concerning the
issue of canonicity and the early church that are unfortunately defined poorly or not defined at all.
In order for a proper understanding to be in place Christians must understand the proper
definitions of the terms commonly used. Only then can they combat the errors so frequently
leveled.
The term canon transliterates the Greek (kanon), which in turn derives from a
Semitic word for reed (used to measure length by). The Greek word is used in Galatians 6:16 to1
refer to the rule of faith in Jesus Christ. A canon is the closed list of books that was officially2
accepted retrospectively by a community as supremely authoritative and binding for religious
practice and doctrine. The Christian canon therefore is codified in the 66 books of the Old and3
New Testaments that convey the rule of faith in Jesus Christ. The term Scripture simply refers
to the written word and parallels this definition. For the purposes of this work the word canon,4
Scripture, and Biblewhich literally means bookwill be used synonymously.
THE PROCESS OF CANONIZATION
7/29/2019 Sola Scriptura in the Early Church
7/21
Acts 17:115
E. Caner, The Popu lar Encyclopedia of Apolog etics: Surveying the Evidence for the Truth of Christianity.6
(Harvest House Publishers, 2008.)108.
Matt 7:12, 22:40; Acts 24:14, etc.7
J. MacArthur, The MacArthur Bible Commentary. (Thomas Nelson, 2005.) 1077.8
2
One of the greatest sources of confusion in modern times is the difference between the
process of canonization and the authority of the canon itself. If an individual is exclusively
informed by liberal theologians they may think that the process is what gave rise to the authority,
when in reality its the other way around. The church did not grant the Scriptures their authority
by compiling them. Rather, the authority of the Scriptures themselves legitimized the process the
church took in recognizing them as such. The early church believed the Bible existed
independent from and over the church, not vice-versa. Still, it is helpful in our study to gain some
background information as to how the process of canonization was completed before proceeding.
The first century church, as evidenced by numerous quotations both in the New Testament
and among the early church fathers, already possessed the Old Testament Scriptures. In Acts Paul
commends the Bereans for examining the Scriptures daily to see whether these things were so.5
The only source of Scripture readily available to the Bereans would have been the Hebrew Old
Testament in the form of the Septuagint (a Greek translation dating from 100-250 B.C. ). Jesus6
and the apostles both repeatedly cited the Law and the Prophets as the standard of faith.7
Christianity was a continuation of Judaism, and therefore held to the sacred writing of the Jews
hence rejecting the apocryphal writings of the intertestamental periodan issue we will further
expound on. The Old Testament canon was closed after the prophecy of Malachi (433-424 B.C. )8
7/29/2019 Sola Scriptura in the Early Church
8/21
S. B. Chapman, The Law and the Prophets: A Study in Old Testament Canon Formation. (Mohr Siebeck9
GmbH KG, 2000.) 58.
Caner,Encyclopedia of Apologetics, 108.10
J. and S. McDowell. The Bible Handb ook of Difficult Verses: A Complete Guide to Answering the Tough11
Questions. (Harvest House Pub, 2013.) 18.
3
and affirmed by the Jewish community when in 164 B.C. Judas Maccabeus compiled a list of
canonical books. Due to groups such as the Masoretes meticulous and careful scribal practices9
ensured that the received text of the Old Testament was handed down almost unchanged.10
While the veracity of the Law and the Prophets are attacked in modern media, they are not
generally thought to have been manipulated by the early church like the New Testament is
commonly thought to have been. Therefore, the transmission and affirmation of the New
Testament Scriptures is where we now turn our attention.
It should be noted first that none of the original documents of New Testament Scripture are
still in existence, at least if any of them are, they are not known to us. What we do have are
nearly 25,000 manuscripts or fragments of manuscripts . . . among these are nearly 5,800 Greek
manuscripts . . . which is over three times as many as for the Iliad. Just the sheer volume of11
such a number can give a Christian much confidence in the New Testament simply for the fact
that if variation does exist in a particular text there are always other texts, and many times earlier
texts, to compare it with. Another significant point that should be made is the fact that no church
counseldue to the geographical spread and abundance of manuscriptscould have physically
eradicated a biblical text with which there was a disagreement.
There are four basic groups of New Testament fragments organized based on the material
which they were written on: The papyri, the uncials, the minuscules, and the lectionaries. The
7/29/2019 Sola Scriptura in the Early Church
9/21
Corley et al. Biblical Hermeneutics: A Comprehensive Introduction to Interpreting Scripture. (Nashville:12
Broadman and Holman, 2002), 221.
J. Calvin,Institutes of the Chris tian Religion . (Hayes Barton Press, n.d.) 997.13
P. Voerding, The Trouble With Christianity: A Concise Outline of Christian History: From the14
Traditional Western Birth of Christ to Contemp orary American Evan gelical Fundamentalism . (AuthorHouse, 2009).
39 .
4
papyri were written in Greek and date from the 2 through 7 centuries (there are currentlynd th
ninety-nine fragments in existence); there are three hundred uncials dating from the 3 to 11rd th
centuries; 2,800 minuscules (the earliest of which date from the 9 century); and 23,000th
lectionaries dating from the 6 century and later. These texts have been broken down into moreth 12
or less significant manuscripts and through the process of compare and contrast have been used
by modern translators to gain an accurate depiction of the originals.
The early church was nothing like the modern Roman Catholic establishment and cannot be
compared with it. Christians were undergoing the waves of persecution and heresy on an
everyday basis. The religion was spreading so fast that it can be better compared to the awkward
staggering of a young adolescent rather than the oiled machinery of a corporate hierarchy. The
church was certainly a grassroots endeavor being controlled by the Holy Spiritnot a group of
men in closed-door meetings. (It wasnt until the 5 century that Rome consolidated real power:th
in part because Rome was the political capital and in part because other regions of Christendom
were in turmoil ). Interestingly enough, it was these two situations (persecution and heresy) that13
drove the church to attempt to recognize the cannon in its early days.
The rise of Gnosticism was the churchs chief threat in its infant years. Valentinuss
heretical teaching on the Trinity left many in the church wondering how the Bible ought to be14
interpreted. In Rome toward the middle of the second century Marcion, who was raise in
7/29/2019 Sola Scriptura in the Early Church
10/21
R. E. Rub enstein, When Jesus Became G od: The Epic Fight over Christs Divinity in the Last Days of15
Rome. (Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2000.) 33.
MacArthur, Bible Commentary. (Thomas Nelson, 2005.) 1094.16
Ibid.17
Ibid.18
Ibid.19
Ibid.20
5
Christianity, came up with his own cannon in which he excluded the Law and the Prophets as
well as three out of four of the gospels themselves. The church needed to respond somehow to
these errant teachings. Then on February 23, 303 . . . [Rome] posted an edict banning Christian
worship . . . [and] church officials were ordered to hand over their sacred books for burning.15
Not only did the church need to defend the word of God, but they needed to preserve it.
The informed Christian should know that the New Testament was not accepted in one
moment as a finished work. This is obvious simply from the construction of the canon itself.
Each book was written for a different reason, a different audience, a different location, and over a
span of time (A.D. 44-49 to A.D. 94-96) . For instance, Luke wrote the Gospel of Luke (A.D.16
60-61) and Acts (A.D. 62) to Theophilus as a history, Matthew wrote to a Jewish audience17 18
(A.D. 50-60) , Paul, the apostle to the gentiles, wrote many personal and corporate letters much19
of the time in reaction to issues individuals and churches were having (A.D. 49-50 to A.D. 66-
67) , etc. It should never be assumed that the Canon came from heaven in a pristine form20
encased by steal and glass. This was not Gods method of preservation. Instead, he used fallible
men to accomplish His perfect purpose both in authoring the Scripture and in preserving it.
The majority of the Canon was actually received and accepted by the church very early on,
7/29/2019 Sola Scriptura in the Early Church
11/21
H. R. Boer,A Short History of the Early Church . (Eerdmans, 1976). 72.21
Everett Ferguson. Church History. (Grand Rapids, Mich: Zondervan, 2005.) Kindle Locations 2255-225622
6
but because the church was so spread out and because the circulation of different letters made
their way to different regions at different times, there were some books that were contested. One
of the earliest lists of Canonical books is referred to as the Muratorian Fragment and was
written in about 170. [It] lists the four Gospels, Acts, the Pauline epistles, I and II John, Jude,
and Revelation. Hebrews, James the two epistles of Peter, and III John are not included. In21
the fourth and fifth centuries there came to be general agreement in the Greek and Latin churches
about the extent of the New Testament canon. The final expression of canonical reception22
came when Athanasius, the Bishop of Alexandria in A.D. 367, published the Canon containing
the same books used today by protestant churches (and Catholic up until the Council of Trent in
A.D. 1545). Three key councils around the time of Athanasiuss publication worked to confirm
and solidify the books contained in the New Testament. The Council of Laodicea in A.D. 363,
The Council of Hippo in A.D. 393, and the Council of Carthage in A.D. 397, all worked to apply
what are commonly called the tests of canonicity to demonstrate what was of God and what
wasnt. The first test was that of orthodoxy. Did the book or group of books contradict the rule of
faith? The second test is referred to as Apostolicity. Can the work be traced back to an Apostle or
someone connected to the Apostles? The third test is called the test of universality. Does the
work apply to the church as a whole? It is because of these tests that the books commonly
referred to as the Apocrypha failed to make their way into the Biblical Canon. As Athanasius
stated:
7/29/2019 Sola Scriptura in the Early Church
12/21
Ibid., Kindle Locations 2272-22 75.23
7
There are other books outside these, which are not indeed included in the canon, but
have been appointed from the time of the fathers to be read to those who are recent converts
to our company and wish to be instructed in the word of true religion. These are the Wisdom
of Solomon, the Wisdom of Sirach, Esther, Judith, Tobit, the so-called Teaching of the
Apostles [Didache] and the Shepherd. But while the former are included in the canon and
the latter are read, no mention is to be made of the apocryphal works. They are the inventionof heretics.23
As will be demonstrated, the men involved in these councils were not seeking to establish a
Canon of their own, but rather to recognize a Canon that had already been given.
WHAT THE BIBLE SAYS ABOUT ITSELF
It may seem so far that there has been little said regarding the early churchs belief in
sola scriptura, but upon a deeper reflection it should be noted that this is precisely what we have
been discussing. The process of canonization is a testimony to the early churchs incapability of
strong-arming itself into a position of acting as the Bibles authority. There was no way the early
church could eradicate texts it thought undesirable, and there was no way, in the fractured world
of early Christianity, a solid consensus could be built around a controllable group of leaders. This
was also not the desire of the early church as we have seen in their canonicity tests. They viewed
themselves as ones affirming a truth already granted by God. In this next section we will continue
this vein to find out what the Biblethe compilation venerated and affirmed by the churchsays
about itself.
The most common passage quoted when discussing biblical authority is 2 Timothy 3:16-17
which states, All Scripture is inspired by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for
correction, for training in righteousness; so that the man of God may be adequate, equipped for
7/29/2019 Sola Scriptura in the Early Church
13/21
2 Tim 3:16-1724
Zech 1:3, Jer. 34:2, 1 Kings 21:19, etc.25
J. R. White, Scripture Alone: Exploring the Bibles Accuracy, Authority and Au thenticity. (Baker26
Publishing Group, 2004). 14-15.
2 Pet 1:2127
2 Pet 1:1928
8
every good work. What is it that makes men equipped for every good work? It is not the24
church, but rather Scripture itself. The word inspired literally means, god-breathed. The New
Testaments authority comes as much from God as the Old Testaments Thus Saith the Lord,25
comes from God. Commenting on this statement Dr. James White explains, It is both a positive
statement, asserting the supremacy and uniqueness of the Word, and a negative one, denying the
existence of any other rule of authority on the same level. The second Scripture for26
consideration is 2 Peter 1:21 which says, But know this first of all, that no prophecy of Scripture
is a matter of ones own interpretation, for no prophecy was ever made by an act of human will,
but men moved by the Holy Spirit spoke from God. In context, Peter has just finished27
explaining his experience on the Mount of Transfiguration. He then switches gears to let his
audience know in verse 19 that there is a word made more sure than even his own personal28
experience, and that word is revealed in verse 21 as the Scriptures themselves. The reason the
Apostle Peter trusted the Scriptures over his own experience was because the Scriptures were
given by God and not subject to ones own interpretation. The men who were used to write the
Canon Peter tells us were moved (or carried along) by the Holy Spirit. There are numerous
other Scriptures that also attest to what both Peter and Paul confirm in their writingsthat there
exists no higher authority than the Word of God. It is this view that was adopted by the early
7/29/2019 Sola Scriptura in the Early Church
14/21
J. Killian, Truth of Our Faith. (iUniverse, 2011). 179 .29
A. Roberts, The Ante-Nicene Fathers. (Christian Literature Publishing Company, 188 8.) 227.30
9
church, and because of this view the Scriptures must authenticate themselves, for to put them
under the authority of any man or group of men would be to rob them of their very nature.
THE CHURCH FATHERS SPEAK
No matter how many issues the church fathers disagreed with each other on, one viewpoint
seems to have universal acceptance. The preceding sentence seems almost to be the type of
statement a mystery/thriller about the early church would open with but unfortunately, for the
conspiracy theorist, the issue being discussed establishes the very opposite of what true
conspiracies are made of. The early church believed insola scriptura and this can be clearly seen
when their leaders words are carefully examined. If ever there was a conspiracy in the early
Christian period, it was a conspiracy to establish the Bible as the sole authority for faith and
practice and the church as its humble servant.
Hippolytus of Rome (170 235 A.D.) was the most important third century theologian in
the Christian Church in Rome. He was the disciple of Irenaeus, who in turn was the disciple of29
Polycarp, who was a disciple of the Apostle John. Hippolytus wrote an incredible amount of
Christian material most notably theRefutation of All Heresies. He died as a martyr in 235 A.D.
under the persecution of Emperor Maximinus Thrax. Hippolytus had this to say about the
cannon.
There is, brethren, one God, the knowledge of whom we gain from the Holy Scriptures,
and from no other source.... Whatever things, then, the Holy Scriptures declare, at these let
us look; and whatsoever things they teach, these let us learn.30
7/29/2019 Sola Scriptura in the Early Church
15/21
L. Gambero,Ma ry and the Fathers of the Church: The Ble ssed V irg in Ma ry in Patris tic Though t.31
(Ignatius Press, 1999). 99.
J. H. Newman. Select Treatises in Controversy with the Arians. (John Henry Parker, 1842.) 57.32
Athanasius of Alexandria,Agains t the H eathen . (Fig, n.d.) 1.33
P. Schaff,Nicene a nd Post-Nicene Fathers: Second Series Volu me IV An tha na sius: Se lec ts Works and34
Letters. (Cosimo, 2007.) 453.
10
The exclusivity of Hippolytuss statement is hard to miss. He doesnt give any credence to the
church or extra-biblical tradition. On the contrary, he outlaws them as refuges by which to escape
fromsola scriptura.
Athanasius (ca. 296-298 373 A.D.), mentioned previously in this work for having
compiled an accurate list of the canonical books, served as the archbishop of the church in
Alexandria and played a leading role at First Council of Nicaea for opposing Arianism.
Athanasius was also persecuted in five separate exiles spanning a seventeen year time span.
St. Gegory of Nazianzen called him pillar of the Church for his invaluable work against31
heresy. Here is what he had to say about the authority of the Scriptures: The tokens of truth are
more exact as drawn from Scripture, than from other sources. Obviously it is clear what32
authority Athanasius stood upon as he fought the heresy of Arianism. It was not in his title of
archbishop but rather in his deference to where true exactness comes from. The sacred and
inspired Scriptures are sufficient to declare the truth. It is more than a bit ironic that someone33
who took such a prominent role in the First Council of Nicaea likewise had this to say concerning
councils. Vainly then do they run about with the pretext that they have demanded Councils for
the faiths sake; for divine Scripture is sufficient above all things. By all things it is apparent34
Athanasius is including councils in his statement.
7/29/2019 Sola Scriptura in the Early Church
16/21
P. Schaff,Nicene a nd Post-Nicene Fath ers Second Series, Basil: Letter s and Selec t Works. (Cosimo,35
2007.) Lii.
P. Schaff, and H. Wace. A Se lect Library of Nicene a nd Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church: S t.36
Basil: Letters and Selec t Works. 1895. (Christian literature Company, 1895.) 31 2.
11
Another stalwart against Arianism in the early church was a man by the name of Basil of
Caesarea (329 or 330 379 A.D.). Labeled among the Cappadocian Fathers and influential in
championing the Nicene Creed, Basil was also involved in making his mark on early monastic
life as well as succeeding Eusebius as the Bishop of Caesarea. Although there are no doubt
issues which many modern Protestants may disagree with Basil on, he would have no qualms
aboutsola scriptura.
We ought carefully to examine whether the doctrine offered us is conformable to
Scripture, and if not, to reject it. Nothing must be added to the inspired words of God; all
that is outside Scripture is not of faith, but is sin.35
It doesnt get much clearer than that. Not only is Scripture of the highest authority, anything
deviating from it is sinful in the eyes of Basil. The very Nicene Creed he forwarded was therefore
viewed as a support beam of the Scriptures, not a replacement, or an assistant to them.
On a separate occasion, Basil had this to say to a Christian widow.
Enjoying as you do the consolation of the Holy Scriptures, you stand in need neither of
my assistance nor of that of anybody else to help you to comprehend your duty. You have
the all-sufficient counsel and guidance of the Holy Spirit to lead you to what is right.36
This may surprise many modern Catholics. One of the Doctors of their church believes that a
bishop in the church itself is of no help in comprehending the Scriptures. On the contrary, it is
the responsibility of the Holy Spirit coupled with the illumination of the text of the Scripture
itself. Basil did of course believe in the office of a pastor-teacher, but he believed it was the job
7/29/2019 Sola Scriptura in the Early Church
17/21
J. A. Hardon, The Treasury of Catholic Wisdom . (Ignatius Press, 1987.)37
James White. Francis Beckwith Begins to Give H is Reasons (#3). Alpha and Omega M inistries, June 7,38
2007. http://www.aomin.org/aoblog/index.php?itemid=2033.
12
of laymen to examine what was being taught and compare it to Scripture.
Concerning the Hearers: that those hearers who are instructed in the Scriptures should
examine what is said by the teachers, receiving what is in conformity with the Scriptures
and rejecting what is opposed to them; and that those who persist in teaching such doctrines
should be strictly avoided.37
Let us now turn our attention to another influential bishop, Basils brother Gregory of Nyssa
(c. 335 c. 395 A.D.). Gregory was another champion of Trinitarian theology and participated in
the synod at Ancyra, the Synod of Antioch, and the First Council of Constantinople. Today he is
considered a saint in Roman Catholicism, Eastern Orthodoxy, Oriental Orthodoxy, Lutheranism,
and Anglicanism. Gregorys views match those of his brother: We make the Holy Scriptures the
canon and the rule of every dogma; we of necessity look upon that, and receive alone that which
may be made conformable to the intention of those writings. Everything, from Gregorys point38
of view, must be conformable or made to fit into the intention of the Bible. This would
mean everything that deviates from it is illegitimate.
Cyril of Alexandria (c. 376 444) was a very influential bishop in the patristic period of the
church. Often referred to as Pillar of Faith or Seal of all the Fathers, Cyril served as the Patriarch
of Alexandria and was a central figure in the First Council of Ephesus. Cyril, one of the most
powerful forces in the Christian world at the time, even rubbing shoulders with the emperor, had
much to say aboutsola scriptura.
Let us then speak concerning the Holy Ghost nothing but what is written; and
whatsoever is not written, let us not busy ourselves about it. The Holy Ghost Himself spoke
7/29/2019 Sola Scriptura in the Early Church
18/21
Saint Cyril of Jerusalem, Catechetical Lectures. (OrthodoxEbooks, n.d.) 286.39
P. Schaff,Nicene a nd Post-Nicene Fath ers Second Series: Cyril of Jerusalem, (Gregory Nazianzen.40
Cosimo, 2007). 23.
D. L. Jeffrey,Houses of the Interpreter:Read ing Bib le, Rea ding Culture . (Baylor U niversity Press,41
2004). 48.
13
the Scriptures; He has also spoken concerning Himself as much as He pleased, or as much
as we could receive. Let us therefore speak those things which He has said; for whatsoever
He has not said, we dare not say.39
Notice the humility in which Cyril offers us his statement. He wished to constrain himself to
only speaking that which was found in Scripture. Why? Because:
Concerning the divine and holy mysteries of the Faith, not even a casual statement
must be delivered without the Holy Scriptures; nor must we be drawn aside by mere
plausibility and artifices of speech. Even to me, who tell you these things, give not absolute
credence, unless you receive the proof of the things which I announce from the Divine
Scriptures. For this salvation which we believe depends not on ingenious reasoning, but on
demonstration of the Holy Scriptures.40
In other words, Cyril sought to restrain himself from dogmatically forwarding any opinion found
outside of Scripture for the simple reason that salvation depends on the Scriptures themselves.
What else is of importance? Notice also how Cyril places the Scriptures above even human
reason!
Last, but certainly not least, let us discuss the champion of early ChristianitySt. Augustine
himself (354 430 A.D.), perhaps the most respected man in all of church history excluding the
Apostles themselves. St. Augustines words ring true to every Christian of every age.
Let us treat scripture like scripture, like God speaking; dont ... look there for man going
wrong. It is not for nothing, you see, that the canon has been established for the Church. This is
the function of the Holy Spirit. So if anybody reads my book, let him pass judgment on me. If I
have said something reasonable, let him follow, not me, but reason itself; if Ive proved it by the
clearest divine testimony, let him follow, not me, but the divine scripture.41
7/29/2019 Sola Scriptura in the Early Church
19/21
14
Augustine demonstrates a great humility as well. His desire is for Christians to look to Scripture
and not him. It is telling what the great theologian says about the relationship of Scripture to the
church. The canon has been established for the Church. This statement simply implies that it
wasnt the church that established the canon, but rather the other way around. The church would
have no authority if it wasnt for the canonthe canon of Scripture given by God.
CONCLUSION
As has been demonstrated throughout this work, the church viewed the Scripture as the self-
authenticating word of God relying on no higher power than itself. First we looked at the process
of canonization and demonstrated that the early church did not have the option available to itself
that would make it possible for it to destroy variations in the text it thought disagreeable.
Secondly, we saw that the early churchs goal was to preserve, as instruments of God, what was
recognized by God as Scripture. Thirdly, knowing that the church was for the authority of the
Canon, we examined what the Canon had to say about itselfhow it states there is no higher
authority that exists. Fourthly, we saw that the early and patristic church fathers were unified in
extolling the viewpoint Scripture has about itself. They placed themselves under its authority, not
the authenticity of Scripture under theirs.
7/29/2019 Sola Scriptura in the Early Church
20/21
15
WORKS CITED
Alexandria, A. Against the Heathen. Fig, n.d..
Boer, H. R. A Short History of the Early Church. Eerdmans, 1976.
Brighenti et al. The Catholicism Answer Book: The 300 Most Frequently Asked Questions.
Sourcebooks, Incorporated, 2007.
Calvin, J. Institues of the Christian Religion. Hayes Barton Press, n.d.
Caner, E. The Popular Encyclopedia of Apologetics: Surveying the Evidence for the Truth of
Christianity. Harvest House Publishers, 2008.
Chapman, S. B. The Law and the Prophets: A Study in Old Testament Canon Formation. Mohr
Siebeck GmbH KG, 2000.
Ferguson, Everett. Church History. Grand Rapids, Mich: Zondervan, 2005.
Gambero, L. Mary and the Fathers of the Church: The Blessed Virgin Mary in Patristic Thought.
Ignatius Press, 1999.
Hardon, J. A. The Treasury of Catholic Wisdom. Ignatius Press, 1987.
Jeffrey, D. L. Houses of the Interpreter: Reading Bible, Reading Culture. Baylor University
Press, 2004.
Jerusalem, S. C. Catechetical Lectures. OrthodoxEbooks, n.d.
Killian, J. Truth of Our Faith. iUniverse, 2011.
MacArthur, J. The MacArthur Bible Commentary. Thomas Nelson, 2005.
McDowell, J., and S. McDowell. The Bible Handbook of Difficult Verses: A Complete Guide to
7/29/2019 Sola Scriptura in the Early Church
21/21
16
Answering the Tough Questions. Harvest House Pub, 2013.
Newman, J. H. Select Treatises in Controversy with the Arians. John Henry Parker, 1842.
Roberts, A. The Ante-Nicene Fathers. Christian Literature Publishing Company, 1888.
Rubenstein, R. E. When Jesus Became God: The Epic Fight over Christs Divinity in the Last
Days of Rome. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2000..
Schaff, P. Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers Second Series, Basil: Letters and Select Works.
Cosimo, 2007. http://books.google.com/books?id=YCcKWmtee5oC.
Schaff, P. Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers Second Series: Cyril of Jerusalem, Gregory
Nazianzen. Cosimo, 2007.
Schaff, P. Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Second Series Volume IV Anthanasius: Selects
Works and Letters. Cosimo, 2007.
Schaff, P., and H. Wace. A Select Library of Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian
Church: St. Basil: Letters and Select Works. 1895. Christian literature Company, 1895.
VanderKam, J., and P. Flint. The Meaning of the Dead Sea Scrolls: Their Significance For
Understanding the Bible, Judaism, Jesus, and Christianity. Bloomsbury, 2005.
Voerding, P. The Trouble With Christianity: A Concise Outline of Christian History: From the
Traditional Western Birth of Christ (Pbuh) to Contemporary American Evangelical
Fundamentalism. AuthorHouse, 2009.
White, J. R. Scripture Alone: Exploring the Bibles Accuracy, Authority and Authenticity. Baker
Publishing Group, 2004.
White, James. Francis Beckwith Begins to Give His Reasons (#3). Alpha and Omega
Ministries, June 7, 2007. http://www.aomin.org/aoblog/index.php?itemid=2033.