Support for the coordination of activities
TECHNOLOGY PLATFORMS
Context, Rationale and State of Play
Presentation
byJulie Sors
European Commission
Rotterdam, 21 April 2005
Support for the coordination of activities
Elements of Presentation
1. Main features of technology platforms
2. Emerging experience
3. Governance aspects
4. Community role
Support for the coordination of activities
Technology Platforms:Overall Concept
The
Stakeholders, led by industry, getting together to define a Strategic Research Agenda on a number of strategically important issues with high societal relevance where achieving Europe’s future growth, competitiveness and sustainability objectives is dependent upon major research and technological advances in the medium to long term.
Support for the coordination of activities
Technology Platforms:
Rationale
• Contribute to Competitiveness (Lisbon goal)
• Boost research performance
- ERA, 3% target
• Positive impact on other Community policies
• Concentrate efforts and address fragmentation
Support for the coordination of activities
Technology Platforms:
Central Concept
Framework to unite stakeholders around:
a common “vision” for the technology concerned
mobilisation of a critical mass of research and innovation effort
definition of a Strategic Research Agenda
Support for the coordination of activities
Technology Platforms:
Characteristics
Address challenging issues for growth Embody major technological advances
- medium/long-term
Bring Community added value Involve high research intensity Require a Common European approach
– research and technological development… to demonstration…..to, in the longer-term, market penetration
Support for the coordination of activities
Technology Platforms:
Three Stages
Stage 1: Stakeholders get together
Stage 2: Stakeholders define a Strategic Research Agenda
Stage 3: Stakeholders implement the Strategic Research Agenda
Support for the coordination of activities
Emerging Topics for Platforms
• Radical Change in a Sector - example: Hydrogen / Fuel Cells
• Sustainable Development - example: Plant Genomics and Biotechnology
• Public Goods and Services - example: Innovative Medicines for Europe
• Strategic, High-Technology - example: Aeronautics
• Industrial Renewal - example: Steel
Currently +/- 20 Emerging Fields
Support for the coordination of activities
Governance Structure:Hydrogen/Fuel Cells Platform
• Overall Objective: Build Future “Hydrogen Economy”
• Advisory Council: Highest Level / Wide Range of Stakeholders
• Sub-Groups: Defining Strategic Research Agenda and Deployment Strategy
• Member States: Involved through “Mirror Group”
• Working Parties: Financial Engineering, Business Development, Public Awareness, Education and Training etc.
• Secretariat: Administrative Support
Support for the coordination of activities
Technology Platforms:
Factors for Success (I)
Set out “Vision” before going ahead(is the platform approach the right one for this particular technology?)
Openness,Transparency,Communication(code of best practice recently established)
Consider financial aspects at early stage (mobilisation of a range of possible funding sources, including: Community Framework Programmes, Structural Funds, national, regional and private research funding, EIB, EUREKA)
Support for the coordination of activities
Technology Platforms:
Factors for Success (II)
Operational focus at early stage (e. g. integration of relevant projects already completed or underway at European, national and regional levels)
Commitment of national authorities(« Mirror » Groups formed by several platforms)
Education and Training needs(numerous qualified researchers needed over a long period)
Support for the coordination of activities
Openness and Transparency
• Code of Good Practice
• Key Elements:
- Rotation of Membership of Advisory Council
- Regular Stakeholder Meetings- Openness to Participation of New
Stakeholders- Dedicated Platform Website
Support for the coordination of activities
Technology Platforms:
Commission Involvement
NOT: “Owner”, Steering or Directing Formally Labelling Bound by Views of Platforms
BUT: Fostering a “Bottom-Up” Approach Facilitating Guiding where Necessary
Support for the coordination of activities
Community Support Run-Up to FP7
FP6 can potentially support:
operational entities (Secretariat, Mirror Groups etc.)
projects suitable for bringing within the platform
Support for the coordination of activities
Community Support
During FP7• Majority of Strategic Research Agendas
Implemented through Existing Community Instruments (some adaptation possibly needed)
• Synergy between Strategic Research Agendas and Priorities for Thematic Research
• Limited Number of Long-Term Public-Private Partnerships – “Joint Technology Initiatives”
Support for the coordination of activities
Joint Technology Initiatives
The
May Take the Form of Joint Undertakings – Article 171 of the Treaty
Article 171
“The Community may set up joint undertakings or any other structure necessary for the efficient execution of Community research, technological development and demonstration programmes”
Support for the coordination of activities
Next Steps
1. Continue discussions with key stakeholders
2. Continue to facilitate the development of technology platforms in the run-up to FP7
Support for the coordination of activities
Further information
Website
www.cordis.lu/technology-platforms