OCAD University Open Research RepositoryFaculty of Design
2016
Synthesis maps: Systemic design pedagogy,
narrative, and interventionBowes, Jeremy and Jones, Peter
Suggested citation:
Bowes, Jeremy and Jones, Peter (2016) Synthesis maps: Systemic design pedagogy, narrative, and
intervention. In: Relating Systems Thinking and Design Symposium (RSD), 13-15 Oct 2016,
Toronto, Canada. Available at http://openresearch.ocadu.ca/id/eprint/1932/
Open Research is a publicly accessible, curated repository for the preservation and dissemination of
scholarly and creative output of the OCAD University community. Material in Open Research is open
access and made available via the consent of the author and/or rights holder on a non-exclusive basis.
Pro eedi gs of RSD S posiu , Toro to,
Sy thesis Maps: Syste i Desig Pedagogy, Na ati e, a d I te e tio Peter Jo es a d Jere y Bo es, OCAD U i ersity, Toro to, Ca ada A st a t Thispaperpresentsaframeworkandprocessforavisuallanguagethatisdevelopingasasystemicvisualmethod,andtointegrateandoutlineaspectsofthissyntheticmapformulationasthesynthesismap bothwithreferencetocontributingauthors,butalsoasacomparisontodesignprinciplesandthemethodofvisualdesignlanguage.)nthiswaythetechnique’spurposeasanemergentandcreativetool‐methodcanbeillustrated,incontrasttotheapproachesofinfographics,andothervisualmapmakingassociatedwithdesignideation,anddesignschemarepresentation.Synthesismapsintegrateevidenceandexpertiseinavisualnarrativeforknowledgetranslationandcommunication.Key o ds G)GAmap,Synthesismap,Socialsystems,Systemsthinking,Systemicdesign,VisualizationI t odu tio Designresearchandeducationhavesearchedformoreeffectivemeansofenablingmultidisciplinarystudyanddesignteamstoscanandframe,communicateproposals,anddevelopresponsestothemorecomplexchallengesthatdesigndisciplinesarecalledupontoaddress Norman&Stappers,.Normanmakestheobservationthatdesignersmustlearnandcollaboratewitharangeofdiversedisciplinesnownecessarytoformulateanddeveloptheproducts,servicesandsystemsinacomplex,increasinglyinstrumentedsociety.Today’shighlyintegratedplatformsanddata‐drivensystemsdemandawiderrangeofdesign,research,facilitationandcraftskillsandknowledge.Systemicdesign,asmostdesigndisciplines,requiresarangeofdesignrolesandtypicallymultipleareasofexpertisetoeffectivelyinformcomplexsystemsprojectsinserviceplatforms,healthcare,large)Tsystemsinsociotechnicalsystems,architecture,andurbandesign.Whilemanydesignprogramshaveadvancedtheirskilldevelopmentingraduateandemergingdesigndisciplines,toolsandmethodsforeffectivedesignandcommunicationofsystemsandsocialpolicyarrangementshavenotkeptpace.Fromadesignresearchperspective,disciplinesadvancinginthecorporatemarketplace,suchasservicedesign,havenurturedthedevelopmentofinstrumentsfordesignandcommunicationofcomplexartefacts.Systemsdesign,policyinnovation,integrateddesignandtransitiondesignhavedevelopedtheircontributionstotheory,stakeholderengagement,anddesignframeworkssignificantly.Therearefewergenerallyacceptedmethodstoolkits–similarinapplicationtotheserviceblueprintorjourneymap–generallyacceptedinsystemsandsystemicdesign.TheG)GAmap Sevaldson, andsynthesismaparethetwotypesofsystemmapsbeingdevelopedinthecontextofcomplexproblempracticeresearch.Theyhavedifferentprocessesandevenintendeduseswhicharehelpfultoarticulate.Thegeneral systemsmap mightbeconsideredabaselineartefactforarticulatingsystem‐leveldesignconceptsandframes.(owever,vastdifferencesofform,meaning,articulationandusagedefinethegapbetweensystemstheory‐basedmapsandthevisualmodelsofsystemicdesign.
Pro eedi gs of RSD S posiu , Toro to,
ThispaperpresentsaninitialframeworkandprocessesadoptedbytheToronto‐basedStrategicForesightand)nnovationprogramforteachingandpracticingsystemdesignmappingforcomplexsocialsystems.DevelopedfromthebasisofSevaldson’s G)GAmaps,theOCADUniversitymethoddiffersinitsalignmenttosystemicdesigntheory Jones, anditssuitabilityforintegratingevidenceandmultipleontologies.Desig Ratio ale (istoricallyinthedisciplinesofdesign,architecture,andurbanplanning,visualcompositionsofasystemicnature,andvisuallanguagehasdevelopedtoillustrateandsolvecomplexproblemsofasystemicnature.Mappingdesignmethodshavebeendevelopedfromamyriadofvisualdesigntoolsandrepresentationframeworksforcomplexproblemunderstanding,visualanalysis,andsolutionfinding.Synthesismapsareformulatedbymixed‐disciplinedesignteamsasaconstructivistapproachtovisualsensemakingforhypercomplex,orwickedproblems.Synthesismapsaredevelopedfromavaryingmixofprimaryresearchandliteratureevidence,yetarehighlyconstructivistartefactsasthesynthesisprocessdevelopsnarrativesthatre‐interprettherelationsandmeaningsofevidencewithinthesystem.Themapsareproductsofsynthesis,astheyrepresentthechoicesmadebymultiplesynthesispropositionsandconfigurationsthatresultinavisualintegrationofmultiplerepresentationsandsystemformalisms.Theserepresentationsarechosenbydesignerstofacilitatesensemakingbythe contentstakeholders ordecisionparticipantsoftheproblemspace.Diffe e tiatio of Sy thesis Maps SynthesismappingwasdevelopedoverseveralyearsofstudioeducationandformativeprocessenhancementatOCADUniversity’sStrategicForesightand)nnovation SF) graduateprogram.TheSF)programadaptedtheG)GAmapprocessinitsSystemicDesigncourseoveratwo‐yearperiodofdevelopmentandteaching,incollaborationwithOsloSchoolofArchitectureandDesign.Theauthorsco‐teachtheSF)SystemicDesigncourseusingamixed‐studioandseminarpedagogy.UnliketheA(OG)GAmapstudioprocess,theSF)programdoesnothavesponsoredstudios,andthesystemmapsaredevelopedforcourse‐basedproblems.Thisconstraintontheprogram,aswellasthefairlyshortcourseperiod,limitstheextenttowhichstudentscandevelopmapsasarichsolutiondesignspaceforconstructive,realproblems.FollowingtheA(Omethodascloselyasfeasible,givendifferencesinpurposeandpedagogy,thefirsttwocohortsdevelopedeffectiveG)GAmapsforsocialsystemsdesigncontextssuchasurbantransportation,citywideinfectiousdiseasemanagement,urban‐ruralwildecosystemmanagement,andchildhoodobesity.Themapswereconstructedinsixweeks’timebyteamsof typically fourmixed‐disciplinegraduatestudentsself‐selectingtoprojectteamsbasedonmutualinterestinaselected wickedproblem topic.Subsequentcohorts upto moresince havebeentaughtwithanadaptedmethodologythattakesintoaccounttheSF)programobjectives,theone‐termduration,andthefittoconcurrentcourses,thatalsodemandintensiveteamprojects.Thesynthesismapmethodologyhasemergedfromtheseconstraintsandrequirementsasmuchasitreflectsadifferentmethodology.Forone,theSF)programpromotestheintegrationoflearningacrossdisciplinesforcomplexproblemswithsocietalbenefitaswellasanengagedlearningprocess.Toactivelysupportstudentlearningacrosscourses,theSystemicDesigncoursehasbeenpairedwiththemostsuitable,synergisticothercourseinitscurrentterm.Formostyearsoftheprogram,thishaseventuatedinstudentsmaintainingconsistentdesignteamsbetweenSystemicDesignandthe)nnovationResearchMethodscourse.Forsomecohorts,the
Pro eedi gs of RSD S posiu , Toro to,
pairedcoursewastheStrategicForesightStudio.)ntheintheResearchMethodscoursesynthesismapshavebeenconstructedtorevealsocialsystemsanddynamicsreflectingprimaryfieldresearchoftenconductedinthatcourse.Asteamsworkfromtheirownresearchevidencecollectedandanalysedintheresearchcourse,theirvisualinterpretationsofsimilarfindingsinthesynthesismapsaccruebothinternalcoherencetoareal‐worldsituationandexternalvalidityperceivedbystakeholdersinthedomainsofinterest.Becausethemapsaresynthesizedfromdesignresearchandsocialscienceresearch,theyareuniquelyresponsivetothefieldresearchcontext,yetdevelopedwithinacontinuousinteractivestudioprocess bothstudentteamorganizedandguidedbyaseriesoftutorialandadvisingsessionswithfaculty .TheSF)programisinclusiveofmultipledisciplinesina ‐personcohort,andit’stypicalthateachmapteammighthaveonlyasingleclassically‐trainedvisualorindustrialdesigner.Themixofbusiness,socialscience,arts,andscienceswithinadesigncourseenablesawideintersectionofproblemsandinterventions,whichisfurtherstrengthenedbyacoursethatteachesarangeofsystemsthinkingmappingformalismsandsystemstheoryinthefirsthalfoftheterm.Thesevisualformalisms,discussedbelow,havebecomeanessentialbridgebetweentheprogressively‐developedsystemspedagogyandthevisually‐informeddesignpractice.Webelievethat,forafirstcourseinsystemsthinkingthatproducessystemsmapsasoutcomes,thesynthesismapapproachprovidesuniquevalueofamapartefactthatcapturesandrepresentsthequalityofteamlearningandthereasoningpracticesofsystemsthinkingappliedtocomplexsocialorpolicycontexts. Figure1.Studentteamsketchingearly‐stagesystemmap.)nthisarticleweproposethatthesynthesismapdifferssignificantlyenoughfromtheG)GAmap,evenifbyprocessmorethanartefact,towarrantasupportedexplanation.Whilesimilarmaptypesaredevelopedbystudiopracticesusingbothmethods,keyprocessdistinctionsmightbesummarizedasfollowsinTable .
Pro eedi gs of RSD S posiu , Toro to,
Table1.CriteriadescribingGIGAmapsandSynthesisMaps
CRITERIA / Model GIGAMap Sy thesis Map Size a d scale Large aps, ultis aled, a ro‐ i ro Large, a e ultis aled. Well‐ ou ded. Visual odels Highl aried, ofte ar hite tural, D
Ofte used to reate desig la guages T pi all D, lear fra e, ofte grid‐ ased Ca e isuall si plisti , if arrati e‐led
Theoretical odels Not stro gl theoreti al, More pro ess S ste s odels e pli itl stru ture arrati es Approach to Evide ce Dire tl rele a t to a desig pro le Ofte de eloped fro resear h e ide e
ithout e te si e stakeholders or solutio spa e
Approach to Narrative Separates pro ess a d o u i atio . Ca e used o l i desig thi ki g.
Ofte stro gl arrati e‐ ased. Narrati es sele ted earl i appi g pro ess.
Stakeholder Role Ofte stakeholder led i studio / resear h
Stakeholders ofte dis o ered after resear h a d appi g, allo i g for post‐i tera tio
Syste s Theo y Visual Models Systemstheoryandsystemsengineeringhavedevelopedanumberofwell‐knownvisualmodellingformalismstypicallyusedfordistinctfunctionalrepresentation.Visualformalismsalsoconveytheirepistemologicalframesintheconstraintandexpressivepowerofthechosenmodality.Wehaveseenanumberofvisualtoolsdevelopedtoillustrateandaidintheunderstandingofcomplexsystems,mostofwhichhaveemergedfromthedomainofsystemsthinking.Visualformalmodelshavebeendevelopedasmethodologiesforsystemsanalysisand/orproblemstructuring.FollowingJackson’s typology,mostvisualformalismshaverepresentedmethodsfrombothhardsystems systemdynamics andsoftsystems e.g.,Checkland, .(ardsystemsmodelssuchascausalloopdiagramsforsystemsdynamics,requirereductionistapproachesthatrestrictvariablesandfollowwell‐definedrules.Softsystemsmethodsdrawfromaninterpretiveepistemologythatrecognizesthatacommonunderstandingofaproblemareaisenabledbyanintegratedmultimethodology Midgely,etal, andanexplicitmotiveoflearningandactionplanning.Softsystemsmethodsencourageflexible,organicrepresentationsthatfacilitateproblemunderstandingandstructuring.(ardsystemsmethodsaregenerallyutilizedastechnicalmodellingtechniquesforanalysisandsystemrepresentation.Systemsthinkingandtheoryhasnotledthedesignofnovelvisualsensemakingmethods.Few,ifanysystemdesignmodelshaveemergedfromsystemssciencesorsystemsthinking,includingtheschoolsofcriticalsystemsorevencomplexitytheory.Cyclicandnestedmodelsthatabstractnaturalsystemsprocesseshavebeendefinedasecologicalsystemmodels.Theseincludethepanarchyadaptivecycle Gunderson&(olling, ,Bronfenbrenner’s socioecologicalsystem,andothers.Othercommonlyusedformalismsordesignmodelsincludeinfographics (orn, ,conceptmaps NovakandCanas, ,processflowdiagrams,journeymaps,andotherdesignartefactsdrawnfrominformationdesign,informationarchitecture,graphicdesign,servicedesign,architectureandplanningdisciplines.
Pro eedi gs of RSD S posiu , Toro to,
Ha d Syste Visual Fo alis s Whatwerefertoashardsystemsmodelsincludethecausalloopdiagrams Braun, ,Senge,,stockandflow Meadows&Wright, ,systemigrams Blair,Boardman&Sauser, ,andstructural/influencemaps Warfield&Staley, .Thehardsystemmodelsoftenfunctionasstandaloneanalyticalrepresentationsthatdefineasystemicpatternreferencedinalargerstudy.Theseformalismsareoftenincludedwithinsynthesismapsasdiscretemodelsthatdescribesubsystemorarchetypalbehaviourswithinanentailedboundedsocialsystem.Asignificantdifferencebetweenhardsystemmodelsandthesoftsystemsschoolisthathardsystemsdevelopamodelofcausalitydevelopedfromanalysisofcurrentsystemdynamics.Thepurposeofsystemarchetypes Braun, istoidentifyandcapturerecurrentpatternscommonlyfoundinsocialsystemsandorganizationsthataredefinedascausal,reinforcingandbalancingloops.)nsynthesismapssuchmodelsareoftenincorporatedintolargersynthesesofmultipleprocesseswithinamuchmoreencompassingsystemboundary.Thecausallooporsystemigrambecomesaninset,andservesasamicro‐modelrepresentingacurrentfunction, oftenadysfunction ,withinsocialsystemsnarratedbyasoftsystemoridealizedapproach.ThefollowingfigureshowstheShiftingtheBurden archetypewherebythelongerterm,difficultgoalofbalancinghealthcarecostswithinaninstitutionalbudgetbycreatingpopulationcarenetworksisoffsetbyshiftingtheburdentoashorttermsolution increasingvolumeofchargeabletestsandprocedures thataddressesshorttermcostsbutshiftstheultimatecoststothelong‐term,exacerbatingtheoriginalproblem.Otherhardsystemorprocessmodelsareusedwithinsynthesismapsfornarrativeconstructionanddiscursivepurposes.Theintentionofadoptingmixedmethodsistwofold: toidentifyandportraydiscoveredpatternswithinthecomplexdynamicsofasocialsystemand toconveythesenseofcomplexityinthe actual socialsystembyincreasingillustrationdensitywhilenotsacrificingreadability.Thecasestudypresentedinthisarticleshowstheuseofcausalloopsandprocessdiagramswithinalargesynthesismap,specificallytoconveyrelationshipswhereinterventionsmightbelocatedinacomplexsystem. Figure3.ShiftingtheBurdenArchetype.
Pro eedi gs of RSD S posiu , Toro to,
The Soft Syste Ri h Pi tu e Theotherschoolofsystemicreasoning,softsystems,recommendsmoreinterpretiveandfigurativemodels.ThebestknownrepresentativeapproachisCheckland’sSoftSystemMethodology SSM ,knownfortherichpicture Checkland, ,ChecklandandPoulter, .Theclassicalrichpictureapproachsketchesavisualmodelofthesystemasaparalleltotherealworldsituation asdepicted andisintentionallymeanttobeaprovisionalmodel,subjecttochangeiniterativeinteractions.TheChecklandrichpicturepresentsanidealizedmodelofthepreferredsystemasawaytoconstructinterventionsandcompare,inasingleimage,withtherealworldsystemasperceived.Atypicalintentiondescribedbytherichpictureistofacilitateanongoinglearningcontextasacontinuingprocessfordiscovery,throughthecreationofacommonlanguagewithstakeholders,intext,imageandrelationship.Thesynthesismapadoptsthisprocessexplicitlyinitsiterativestudiodevelopmentandengagementwithsystemstakeholders.Synthesismapssignificantlyextendtherichpicture.TheconventionalSSMmodeldevelopsahand‐sketchedarticulationofrelationshipsbetweenadepictionofsystembehavioursintheworld,theactorsandworldviewsparticipatinginthesystem,andanabstractedsystemmodelthatreferencestherealworldandindicatesitsboundariesandbehaviourtrajectory.Ascribedmeaningsdrawnfromthesysteminterpretationarevisuallydepictedbysymbolism,metaphor,andrepresentationofsite,context,structure,function,processes,andnarrative‐oftencreativelyjuxtaposedorintegratedasacreativedocumentation.Theissues,meaninganddirectionsofacomplexproblemarereferencedinreferentialsketchesandvisualstoillustrateelements,relationships,andinfluentialdynamicproperties.Thispromotesideation,andfacilitatesacomplexproblemsystemicview‐point.)tisthisintegrativedesignprocessandlanguagethatcanbeintegratedintoasystemicvisualmethodthatbuildsonsuccessiveinterpretationandjuxtapositionofsalientsystemelements.De elopi g a Syste i Na ati e Fromantiquitytothepresent,andwithanexponentialrateofexpansiveness,humanshavebeenobsessedwithsystematicallycollectingandreorganizingwhatineffectalreadyexists,initsownkindoforder,ordisorder.Thisdesireforcontrolandcentralisationofourenvironment,hasnodoubtaidedusinthepastandpresent.Nevertheless,manybelieveourinstitutionalizedsystemshavereachedsuchepidemicproportionsthat,notonlyhasthedigitalrevolutionnotbeenabletosolvesystemicproblems,butithasclearlyaggravateditwithacombinatorialexplosionoffragmentedinformation.Allofthesesystems,thedigitalnotwithstanding,occupyanincreasinglyhugeamountofspaceandpullresourcesfromtheworld.Asystemicviewpointisafoundationformanyofthecomplexproblemswhichourstudentspursue.Thebasicactionsofanysynthesismappingincludedefiningsystemboundariesandunpackingsystemelementsandsubsystems,followingabasicanalysisofsystemprocesses,structures,functionsandgoals.Tounderstandthecomplexityofaproblemsystem,wehighlightcausalandinfluencingrelationsinearlysystemsketches,anddefinestakeholdersandtheirorganizationsandnetworkswithinthesystem.ThisapproachissupportedbyGharajedaghi’s iterativesystemicanalysis,employedintheOCADUcourse.Thisinformationallowstheconstructionofinitialmapswhichhighlightelements,andsubsystemrelations,andprovideinsightintosystemicbehaviour.Theiterativeinquirytypicallydefinestheinitialsystemlevelsandboundaries,andstudentteamsidentifythesystemlevelfordefinitionfromthesemultiplelevelsorperspectives,Beforeinitiatingthesynthesismap,thissystemsanalysisprocessofmultiplemappingmethodsisextendedwithcausalloopsandarchetypes,stockandflowdiagrams,systemigramsandothersystemicvisualformalisms.
Pro eedi gs of RSD S posiu , Toro to,
The Sy thesis Map Thesynthesismapapproachencouragestheselectionofvisualformalismsappropriatetothescaleandfunctionoftheproblemsystem,aprocessthatbecomesiterativethroughseminar,teaching,studioapplication,andinthecritiquingprocess.Thesynthesismapbecomesanintegrationofmuchofthefindingsfromvariousunpacking,map‐makingandanalysisprocesses.Asaproductoftheprocessitintegratestheinformation,findings,andkeyissuesrelatedtothecomplexsystem,withacontextualnarrativeasasynthesisoftheissuesandinformation,presentedasadesignproblem.Thismethodofsensemakingprovidesawayofvisualizingthesystemicstory,andexploresthepossibilitiesfordesigninterventionandchange‐making,withafocusonkeychangedriversinthesolutionspace.Thesynthesismap,likeSevaldson’sG)GAmapisanartefactthatattemptstodocumentandorganizeapictureofthecomplexproblem.)nthesynthesismapthesystemicportrayalofsystembehaviours,andsystemicrelationstendstobemorehighlighted.Theappliedinterpretativeanalysisgeneratesacombinationoffocalandfiguralelementsprovidinganarrativepictureofthesystemicdesignproblem.Becausethesemapsarequiteoftenutilizedinthecontextofstrategicforesightandinnovationprojects,thesynthesismapsquiteoftenincludeaviewtofuturescenarios,andhorizonsofpossiblechangeandoutcomes.Thefinalformatofthecompletedmapisavisualnarrativewithorganizedandsynthesizedinformationaboutthesubjectdomain,supportedbyprimaryandinterpretedresearch,statistics,facts,archivalinformationandrepresentedbyvisualmetaphors.P i iples a d F a e o k Synthesismapsareusedinsteadofothermodesofsystemmappinginordertodescribeacomplexsocialsystemsufficienttothecomplexityofthedomainofinterest.Weadapttheprincipleofrequisitevarietywheretheproblemrepresentationinthemapmustcorrespond ifnot control tothecomplexityinthesocio‐culturalsystemasunderstoodbystakeholders.)ncoursepedagogyweembracethewickedproblemasacontextfordefinitionandsufficientcomplexity.Theseprincipleshelpseparatethesynthesismapasagenrefrominfographicsorstructuredandsimplifiedsystemsmaps,wheretheintentisfornarrativereadabilityandclarityofdefinition.Theaimofthesynthesisapproachistobebothasvisuallycomplexasthedomainitrepresents,andasunderstandableaspossibletointendedaudiences,whichareoftenstakeholdersnotinvolvedinthemappingprocess.Multiplepurposescanbeembracedbyamappingproject.Communicationofthesocialsystemproblemareaasresearchedandunderstoodisastartingpoint.Anotherpurposeistobeabletoeffectivelyidentifycyclesandprocessinsocialsystemsthatmightrepresentproductiveareasforinterventionorforsystemandservicedesign.Course‐basedsynthesismapsdonotusuallyventureintosystemredesignasthesearetypicallycreatedwithoutthebenefitofextensivesystemstakeholdersontheteam.Thenecessityofstakeholderinclusionbecomesclarifiedwhenstudentprojectsattempttoproposeinterventionanddesignchangeswithouttheiraccesstotheteam.Courseprojectstypicallydescribefirststepstowardfutureredesignproposalsbasedonprinciplesandanalysis,andwherepossible,onadeepunderstandingoftheproblemdomain.
Pro eedi gs of RSD S posiu , Toro to,
Sy thesis Map Te h i ue Throughreflectivestudioandteachingpracticeaswellassponsoredresearch,wehavedevelopedadistinctiveprocesswithpreferredtechniquesforrapidteamconstructionofsynthesismaps.Whatfollowsisanoutlineofaspectsofthissyntheticmapformulation,highlightingtheapproaches,process,andelementsthroughapplicationexamples. Te h i ues ithi the Basi Method Studiopracticesemphasizeanumberofdifferentactivitiesthatcanbeproposedasstartingpointsinthesynthesismapprocess.Thefollowingtechniquesareinrelativeorderoftheirsignificancetothereasoningandearlyproductionofiterativesystemmappingforsynthesismapconstruction. . Synthesismapsareofteninitiatedasprojectsbasedonawickedproblemoftopicofauthenticconcerntothegroupthatproceeds,withorwithoutaccesstostakeholders.)nstudios,teamsconductandaggregateappropriateresearch,performanalysisandsummarizeknowledge.Thisisoftenbasedontheevidencefromstakeholderanalysis.)terationsofstakeholderanalysisofprimary direct ,indirect,institutional,andsocial community stakeholdersareconductedtoidentifythesocialactorsinthesocialsystem.. )ncourseworkweoftenlinkthesynthesismapprojecttoanother,research‐basedcoursethataffordsaccesstostakeholdersandparticipantsforinterviews,observations,experts,andrigorousinquiryintotheproblemdomain.Aresearchquestionorproblemstatementmightdrivethemappingprocessinthiscase.Thishelpsdefinetheprojectscopeandsystemboundariesofthesocialsystemorservice.. Therefollowsaniterativeunpackingofbundledsubsystemsandrelationships.Mapsoftendevelopaconfigurationofthefunctions,structuresandprocesseswithinadefinedsystemboundary.Clarificationofthesystempurposeandcontextsistypicallyformedasanemergentprocessinsuccessivemappingiterations.Thesystemboundaryisinterrogatedinstudiobaseddiscussionstoidentifythebestframingforcontinuingwithsystemmapping.. Preferredsystemmappingformalismsareoftenintroducedtoconstructsystembehaviorsand proposals forproblematicsandregularitiesinasocialsystem.Systemigrams,causalloopdiagrams,influencemaps,richpicture,iterativeinquiry,processflows,panarchy,ecologicalsystemmapsandothersareemployedtorepresentappropriatesystemrelationships.. Atthesametime,teamsareencouragedtoorganicallyexploreandvisuallyrepresentthesalientandtheoreticallysignificantaspectsofasocialsystem.Stakeholdertables,organizationalbreakdowns,architecturalmaps,structuralandprocessviewsarecomposedtorepresentwholesandpartsinrelationtoeachother.. Anabductiveprocessofrepresentation,reasoning,testing,andre‐representationispromoted.Studentsarenotalwaysabletogainaccesstoappropriateexpertsorthefieldtoassesstheirhypothesesandemployavisualreasoningandsimulationprocesstoevaluatethefitofconceptsandsystemproposals.. Completemapvisualizationistypicallydoneclosetothepointofversioncompletion.Visualmetaphorsaresketchedandconsideredforbringingthemaptolife.Narrativeproposalsaretestedagainstthemapandgapsareidentifiedfromthenarrativeorprocessflows.. Manysynthesismapsareformedwithdefinitivetimelinesortemporalmodelsoverlonghorizons.Thelonghorizonmapsgenerallyintegrateforesightmodelsintothesystemframework.Three(orizonsCurryand(odgson, ,roadmapsandoutcomemapsareoftenusedtoelaborateanticipatorymodelsintothesystemview.. Whilesomesynthesismapsidentifyinterventionsearlyinthecycleofdesign,mostteamscompleteasignificantversionofthemap,reachingapointofsharedunderstandingandanarrativebeforedefiningoptionsforsystemicdesigninterventionandchangeproposals.
Pro eedi gs of RSD S posiu , Toro to,
Cou se‐Based Map Case AnexemplarysynthesismaprepresentingtheprocessandproductoftheOCADUcourseispresentedinFigure ,theBiomimeticEconomymapdevelopedbyastudentteam,afutures‐basedsystemmodelsubsequentlypresentedatRSD Church,Benifand&Ahmed, .Figure4.TheBiomimeticEconomy.WithpermissionfromChurch,Benifand&Ahmed ,Theproceedingspapersupportingtheposterpresentationdescribesthelargemapanddiscussesthefunctionsofhumaneconomiesrelevanttoanddrawingfromthreenaturalsystemecologicalregimes.Theleftofthemappresentsakindoflegendofthesixdesignprinciplesforbiomimicryrelevanttoeconomicfunctions–resilience,optimizing,adaptive,systemic,value‐based,andlife‐supporting.Thebottomofthemappresetsalong‐horizontimeline,atypicalorganizingfeatureinsynthesisandG)GAmaps,hererepresentingtherelativeperiodofcenturiesextendingoveraThree(orizonsmodelofthreeeconomicmodes,basedontheprinciplesofecologicalsuccession:
Type)system Current,(orizon ,rapidgrowthcyclestocapitalexhaustion,representedasS‐curves,anunsustainablelineargrowthmodel. Type))system (orizon ,operatingnearthecarryingcapacityoftheeconomy,representedasapanarchycycleofgrowththatexpandstoanasymptote,retractsandreorganizes. Type)))system, (orizon ,characterizedbyaproposedcomplexcontinuouscyclesustainedwithoutcapitalgrowth,similartoanoldgrowthforestecosystem.Multipleembeddedcausalloopsnarratethedynamicsofeachsystemandtheirtransitions.Thecentralcyclicimagerepresentstheemergenceofacirculareconomy,usingJaneJacobs’ model,transitioningfromgrowthenterprises e.g.)BM tothe emergencyadaptations ofemergingsharingeconomyfirms,andthen proposed asshiftingtotruecirculareconomicmodels.
Pro eedi gs of RSD S posiu , Toro to,
Sy thesis Map Case Study – Ca e Resea h )narecentlypublishedmedicaljournalarticle Jones,Shakdher,Singh, wereportedanOCADUniversitycollaborationwithamulti‐yearC)(Rstudy,Can)MPACT.Basedonqualitative,administrativedata,physicianandpatientinterviewsandcancerstatistics,Can)MPACTwasafirst‐everstudyoftheefficacyandimprovementopportunitiesfortheCanadiancancertreatmentsystem,withaspecialfocusonprimarycare.Twosynthesismapsweredeveloped.Theclinicalsystemmap Figure ,CancerCarePathwaysinCanadian(ealthcare,wasalarge‐scaleprocessandsystemmapoftheclinicalsystemsofcareacrossCanadadesignedtocommunicatethefindingsfromtheCan)MPACTstudy.Asecondsynthesismap‐TheClinicalMap Figure visuallyrepresentsbreastandcolorectalcancerprocessesacrossCanadianprovincialandterritorialsystems.Aroadmapmetaphorillustratesasystem‐wideviewofpatientflowacrossthestagesofcancercare.Green roadsigns identifyclinicalcancerstagesacrosstheroadmap:Pre‐Diagnosis,Peri‐Diagnosis,Diagnostic)nterval,Diagnosis,Treatment,Rehabilitation,AfterCare,andSurvivorship withPalliativeCareexpressedasanendpoint .Thevisualmetaphorofseasonaltreesvisuallyconnectsthesestagestothepatient’scancerjourneyfrompre‐diagnosis summer throughtreatment winter ,followedbynewgrowth spring insurvivorship.Figure5.CanIMPACTClinicalSynthesisMap.©2016OCADUStrategicInnovationLab.
Pro eedi gs of RSD S posiu , Toro to,
Thelevelsofprimary,secondaryandtertiarycareguidetheverticaldimension.)nformationandcommunicationstechnologyreachesacrosslevelsandstages,butisshowndisconnectedfromprimarycare.Theroad‐likepathwaysarecolour‐codedwhereexpertsdifferentiatedcarepathwaysbetweenbreastcancer pink andcolorectal blue .Wherenotdistinguished white ,thepathwaysindicatecurrentpracticessharedacrossthecancerjourneys.Yellownavigationsignsindicatecancereventsacrossprimarycarepathways.StartingwithPreventionandendingwithLong‐termCare,theseeventsshowpointsforprimarycarecontinuityduringcancertreatment.Aparallelpathbelowthestagesindicateswheresomepatientsmayalsoemploycomplementaryoralternativetherapies.Significantareasofcomplexitygeneralizedacrosscancercarearerevealedinperi‐diagnosisandthediagnosticintervalpathways.Apatientcanbescreen‐detected andthenpresenttoafamilyphysician,showninthebreastcancerpathway ormaybeinitiallydiagnosedinprimarycare whitepathway .Thecircularpathwaysinthediagnosticcyclesuggestmultiplepossibletestswithinprimarycare.Withaprimarycarediagnosis,patientsarereferredandflowtosecondary/tertiarycancercare.Thestagesofintake,biopsy,pathology,andconfirmeddiagnosisareshown,andthecomplexpathwaysofcancertreatment,shownonthemapinatypical notdefinitive orderofsurgery,radiation/chemotherapy,andcontinuingtreatmentthroughassessmentofoutcome.Figure6.CanIMPACTPatient‐CentredSynthesisMap.©2016OCADUStrategicInnovationLab.
Pro eedi gs of RSD S posiu , Toro to,
Co lusio s Wepresentadescriptionofsynthesismapsasdevelopedandtaughtinaleadinguniversitydesignpractice.Synthesismaps,originallybasedonSevaldson’sG)GAmappingprocess,canincludeawiderangeofsystemmapsformsandtypes,toodiversetobefullypresentedinaproceedingspapers.TheprimarydistinctionbetweensynthesismapsandG)GAmapsistherelianceonevidenceandstructuredsystemmapsusedinthesynthesismaps,drawnintothemappingprocesstosupportthesystemsthinkingpedagogyoftheassociatedcoursepractice,Aswithanysystemmap,theprimarypurposeofthevisualmethodistocommunicateaconsensusmodelofasystemofconcerntostakeholdersandinformedaudiences.Thesynthesismaphassignificantpotentialasadesignartifacttoexplainandproposethroughvisualcompositiontheemergingproblemsandregularitiesasnarrativesentailedinacomplexsocialsystem.Theopen‐endedvisualmodelingapproachprovidesexpandeddegreesoffreedomforsystemdefinitionandintervention,enablingthesynthesismapstobeemployedinawidevarietyofapplicationsandmulti‐stakeholderproblems.Refe e es . Blair,C.D.Boardman,J.T.&Sauser,B.J. .Communicatingstrategicintentwithsystemigrams:Applicationtothenetwork‐enabledchallenge.SystemsEngineering,10 , ‐ .. Braun,W. .Thesystemarchetypes.System,27.. Bronfenbrenner,U. .Theecologyofhumandevelopment.Experimentsbynatureanddesign.Cambridge,MA:(arvardUniversityPress.. ChecklandP. .SystemsTheory,SystemsPractice.Chichester,UK:JohnWiley&Sons.. Checkland,P.,&Poulter,J. .Softsystemsmethodology.)nSystemsApproachestoManaging
Change:APracticalGuide pp. ‐ .SpringerLondon.. Church,R.,Benifand,K.&Ahmed,N. .Reimaginingthefuture:Thebiomimeticeconomy.)nProceedingsofRSD3,ThirdSymposiumofRelatingSystemsThinkingtoDesign.Oslo,Norway:OsloSchoolofArchitectureandDesign,October ‐ , .. Curry,A.,&(odgson,A. .Seeinginmultiplehorizons:Connectingfuturestostrategy.JournalofFuturesStudies,13 , ‐ .. Gharajedaghi,J. .Systemsthinking:Managingchaosandcomplexity:Aplatformfordesigningbusinessarchitecture.Elsevier.. Gunderson,L.(.,&(olling,C.S. .Panarchy:Understandingtransformationsinsystemsofhumansandnature.)sland,Washington.. (orn,R.E. .VisualLanguage:Globalcommunicationforthe21stcentury.Bainbridge,WA:MacroVUPress.. Jacobs,J. .Thenatureofeconomies.NewYork:Random(ouse.. Jones,P.(. .Systemicdesignprinciplesforcomplexsocialsystems.)nG.Metcalfe Ed. ,SocialSystemsandDesign.pp. ‐ .SpringerJapan.. Jones,P.(.,Shakdher,S.&Singh,P. .Synthesismaps:VisualknowledgetranslationforCan)MPACTclinicalsystemandpatientcancerjourneys.CurrentOncology inpress .. Meadows,D.(.&Wright,D. .Thinkinginsystems:Aprimer.ChelseaGreenPublishing.
Pro eedi gs of RSD S posiu , Toro to,
. Midgley,G.,Cavana,R.Y.,Brocklesby,J.,Foote,J.L.,Wood,D.R.,&Ahuriri‐Driscoll,A. .Towardsanewframeworkforevaluatingsystemicproblemstructuringmethods.EuropeanJournalofOperationalResearch,229 , ‐ .. Norman,D.A.,&Stappers,P.J. .DesignX:ComplexSociotechnicalSystems.SheJi:TheJournalofDesign,Economics,andInnovation,1 , ‐ .. Novak,J.D.,&Canas,A.J. .Theoreticaloriginsofconceptmaps,howtoconstructthem,andusesineducation.ReflectingEducation,3 , ‐ .. Senge,P.M. .Thefifthdiscipline.MeasuringBusinessExcellence,1 , ‐ .. Sevaldson,B. .Gigamapping:VisualizationforComplexityandSystemsThinkinginDesign.Nordes,4.(elsinki:NordicDesignResearchConference.. Warfield,J.N.&Staley,S.M. .Structuralthinking:Organizingcomplexitythroughdisciplinedactivity.SystemsResearchandBehavioralScience,13 , ‐ .