RESEARCH POSTER PRESENTATION DESIGN © 2012
www.PosterPresentations.com
(—THIS SIDEBAR DOES NOT PRINT—) DES I G N G U I DE
This PowerPoint 2007 template produces a 36”x48” presentation poster. You can use it to create your research poster and save valuable time placing titles, subtitles, text, and graphics. We provide a series of online tutorials that will guide you through the poster design process and answer your poster production questions. To view our template tutorials, go online to PosterPresentations.com and click on HELP DESK. When you are ready to print your poster, go online to PosterPresentations.com Need assistance? Call us at 1.510.649.3001
QU ICK START
Zoom in and out As you work on your poster zoom in and out to the level that is more comfortable to you.
Go to VIEW > ZOOM.
Title, Authors, and Affiliations Start designing your poster by adding the title, the names of the authors, and the affiliated institutions. You can type or paste text into the provided boxes. The template will automatically adjust the size of your text to fit the title box. You can manually override this feature and change the size of your text. TIP: The font size of your title should be bigger than your name(s) and institution name(s).
Adding Logos / Seals Most often, logos are added on each side of the title. You can insert a logo by dragging and dropping it from your desktop, copy and paste or by going to INSERT > PICTURES. Logos taken from web sites are likely to be low quality when printed. Zoom it at 100% to see what the logo will look like on the final poster and make any necessary adjustments. TIP: See if your school’s logo is available on our free poster templates page.
Photographs / Graphics You can add images by dragging and dropping from your desktop, copy and paste, or by going to INSERT > PICTURES. Resize images proportionally by holding down the SHIFT key and dragging one of the corner handles. For a professional-looking poster, do not distort your images by enlarging them disproportionally.
Image Quality Check Zoom in and look at your images at 100% magnification. If they look good they will print well.
ORIGINAL DISTORTED
Corner handles
Good
prin
/ng qu
ality
Bad prin/n
g qu
ality
QU ICK START ( con t . )
How to change the template color theme You can easily change the color theme of your poster by going to the DESIGN menu, click on COLORS, and choose the color theme of your choice. You can also create your own color theme. You can also manually change the color of your background by going to VIEW > SLIDE MASTER. After you finish working on the master be sure to go to VIEW > NORMAL to continue working on your poster.
How to add Text The template comes with a number of pre-formatted placeholders for headers and text blocks. You can add more blocks by copying and pasting the existing ones or by adding a text box from the HOME menu.
Text size
Adjust the size of your text based on how much content you have to present. The default template text offers a good starting point. Follow the conference requirements.
How to add Tables To add a table from scratch go to the INSERT menu and click on TABLE. A drop-down box will help you select rows and columns.
You can also copy and a paste a table from Word or another PowerPoint document. A pasted table may need to be re-formatted by RIGHT-CLICK > FORMAT SHAPE, TEXT BOX, Margins.
Graphs / Charts You can simply copy and paste charts and graphs from Excel or Word. Some reformatting may be required depending on how the original document has been created.
How to change the column configuration RIGHT-CLICK on the poster background and select LAYOUT to see the column options available for this template. The poster columns can also be customized on the Master. VIEW > MASTER.
How to remove the info bars
If you are working in PowerPoint for Windows and have finished your poster, save as PDF and the bars will not be included. You can also delete them by going to VIEW > MASTER. On the Mac adjust the Page-Setup to match the Page-Setup in PowerPoint before you create a PDF. You can also delete them from the Slide Master.
Save your work Save your template as a PowerPoint document. For printing, save as PowerPoint of “Print-quality” PDF.
Print your poster When you are ready to have your poster printed go online to PosterPresentations.com and click on the “Order Your Poster” button. Choose the poster type the best suits your needs and submit your order. If you submit a PowerPoint document you will be receiving a PDF proof for your approval prior to printing. If your order is placed and paid for before noon, Pacific, Monday through Friday, your order will ship out that same day. Next day, Second day, Third day, and Free Ground services are offered. Go to PosterPresentations.com for more information.
Student discounts are available on our Facebook page. Go to PosterPresentations.com and click on the FB icon.
© 2013 PosterPresenta/ons.com 2117 Fourth Street , Unit C Berkeley CA 94710 [email protected]
Japanese knotweed (Fallopia japonica, syn. Reynoutria japonica; Polygonum cuspidatum) is a clonal plant species that has formed dense monocultures in the riparian zone of the Bronx River in New York City. The knotweed stands have displaced na/ve vegeta/on, decreased biological and structural diversity, and hampered restora/on efforts in this vital riparian habitat. The purpose of this study is to test the effec/veness of two manual knotweed removal techniques and to examine the effects of these removals on the remaining herbaceous community and on newly planted pin oak (Quercus palustris) saplings in a typical container size used in restora/ons. In the spring of 2010, 120 2 x 2 meter plots were designated at two sites in the Bronx River Forest (BRF) and the New York Botanical Garden (NYBG). The knotweed removal treatments were: A) cuYng or B) root/rhizome removal. These treatments were repeated each year from 2010-‐2012 in both sites. Both removal treatments were equally effec/ve at reducing the height of the knotweed canopy at the end of the season and improving the growth of pin oak saplings. Neither treatment was effec/ve in suppressing the density of knotweed stems at the end of the season and neither treatment supported an increased cover of other herbaceous vegeta/on. In conclusion, knotweed management based on cuYng will have similar results with less effort compared to root and rhizome removal. However, neither technique is effec/ve at elimina/ng knotweed and the recovery of na/ve species is limited, at least in the ini/al years of this management program.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND
1. Are mechanical methods of cuYng and root/rhizome removal of Japanese knotweed effec/ve management techniques?
2. Does mechanical management of Japanese knotweed affect other plant species?
3. Does mechanical management of Japanese knotweed affect the growth of a restora/on tree sapling?
STUDY QUESTIONS RESULTS MAIN FINDINGS
• There is no apparent benefit to the laborious removal of roots and rhizomes on plots of this size
• Mechanical removal techniques are unlikely to be effec/ve at elimina/ng knotweed, given widespread presence
• However, frequent removals at the local scale may benefit the growth of saplings, with poten/al longer-‐term benefits for canopy closure
• Pragma/sm is essen/al in management decisions to ensure mechanical removal is used where it will have the best outcome
REFERENCES Bronx River Alliance. 2006. The Bronx River Ecological Restora/on and Management Plan. hcp://www.bronxriver.org/puma/images/usersubmiced/greenway_plan/#pdf Dommanget, F., Evece, A., Spiegelberger, T., Gallet, C., Pacé, M., Imbert, M., & Navas, M.-‐L. (2014). Differen/al allelopathic effects of Japanese knotweed on willow and coconwood cuYngs used in riverbank restora/on techniques. Journal of Environmental Management, 132, 71–8. Gerber, E., Krebs, C., Murrell, C., MoreY, M., Rocklin, R., & Schaffner, U. (2008). Exo/c invasive knotweeds (Fallopia spp.) nega/vely affect na/ve plant and invertebrate assemblages in European riparian habitats. Biological ConservaAon, 141(3), 646–654. Maerz, J. C., Blossey, B., & Nuzzo, V. (2005). Green Frogs Show Reduced Foraging Success in Habitats Invaded by Japanese knotweed. Biodiversity and ConservaAon, 14(12), 2901–2911. New York City Department of Parks and Recrea/on – Natural Resource Group. 2012. Bronx River Riparian Invasive Plant Management Plan. hcps://www.nycgovparks.org/pagefiles/53/FINAL-‐bronx-‐river-‐riparian-‐invasive-‐plant-‐management-‐plan-‐april-‐30-‐2012.pdf Tanner, R. A., & Gange, A. C. (2013). The impact of two non-‐na/ve plant species on na/ve flora performance: poten/al implica/ons for habitat restora/on. Plant Ecology, 214(3), 423–432. Urgenson, L. S., Reichard, S. H., & Halpern, C. B. (2009). Community and ecosystem consequences of giant knotweed (Polygonum sachalinense) invasion into riparian forests of western Washington, USA. Biological ConservaAon, 142(7), 1536–1541. Weston, L. A., Barney, J. N., & DiTommaso, A. (2005). A Review of the Biology and Ecology of Three Invasive Perennials in New York State: Japanese Knotweed (Polygonum cuspidatum), Mugwort (Artemisia vulgaris) and Pale Swallow-‐wort (Vincetoxicum rossicum). Plant and Soil, 277(1-‐2), 53–69.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This project was made possible with funding from the Wildlife Conserva/on Society-‐Na/onal Oceanic and Atmospheric Administra/on, Lower Bronx River Partnership. Brian Aucoin, Ka/e Conrad, Anthony Copioli, Erica DeLuca, Chris Ekstrom, Elaine Feliciano, Valerie Francis, Francesca Giordano, Jennifer Greenfeld, Anne Hunter, Frances Knickmeyer, Kathy Lee, Penny Maca, Michael Mendez, Ellen Pehek, Adam Thornbrough, Ferdie Yau. Numerous Volunteers, Interns, and Students.
The Bronx River extends 23 miles, star/ng in Valhalla, New York, and flowing through Westchester and the Bronx into the East River. The river has been heavily impacted in the past 200 years by dams, railroads, industry, road construc/on, and urbaniza/on. These impacts have greatly disturbed and altered the river’s ecosystems and made the river suscep/ble to invasion by Japanese knotweed, which is now widely distributed along the banks of the river. Japanese knotweed is in a perennial clonal plant species that originates from East Asia. It was first introduced in the U.S. as an ornamental garden plant and has since spread. It has large stems that can reach lengths of over 5 meters and it primarily expands through rhizome growth or rhizome fragment dispersal. Rhizomes can grow over 1 meter below the surface, can extend over 10 meters in length, are coarse and do not stabilize banks as well as fine rooted na/ve woody and herbaceous plants. This species degrades the structure and func/on of the riparian zone by forming dense monocultures that reduce the regenera/on of na/ve plant species and promote eroded, steep banks. Dense stands of knotweed lower not only plant, but animal diversity in the system by reducing habitat provided by large woody species which create in-‐stream cover for organisms. Invasive species management is of high importance to the preserva/on of the limited remaining natural riparian habitats along the Bronx River. The NYC Parks Natural Resource Group, in collabora/on with the Bronx River Alliance and the New York Botanical Garden, built upon the 2006 Ecological and Restora/on and Management Plan for the Bronx River, with the Riparian Invasive Plant Management Plan in 2012. This plan outlined management goals for curbing invasive species in riparian zones and emphasized Japanese knotweed control. This study was conceived based on the need for knotweed management and it serves to contribute more knowledge and data on the effec/veness of different management techniques.
1Ecology, Evolu/on, and Environmental Biology, Columbia University, 2The New York Botanical Garden, 3NYC Parks and Recrea/on Natural Resources Group, 4Bronx River Alliance
Christopher A. Haight1, Jessica A. Schuler2, Kathleen McCarthy3, Sarah Lumban Tobing3, Robin Kriesberg4, Marit Larson3,Machew Palmer1
Japanese Knotweed Management in the Riparian Zone of the Bronx River: The effect of different removal techniques on sapling growth and the herbaceous layer
METHODS 1. 120, 2m x 2m plots along knotweed-‐dominated banks of the river:
• 60 plots in The Bronx River Forest
• 60 plots in The New York Botanical Garden
2. Planted a container-‐size pin oak sapling in the center of each plot in
April 2010.
3. Three treatment types:
1. Cut 3 /mes/year (June, July, September)
2. Cut 1 /me/year (June) and grub 2 /mes/year (July,
September)
3. Control (no treatment)
4. Treatment years
1. Bronx River Forest, 2010-‐2012.
2. NYBG, 2010-‐2013 and beyond.
5. Plot monitoring in September every year before final treatments.
CuYng Plot Root Removal Plot Control Plot
Japanese Knotweed
Pin Oak
Herbaceous Layer
CONCLUSION
The Bronx River CuYng and grubbing plots on the Bronx River in the New York Botanical Garden
• CuYng and root/rhizome removal are equally effec/ve • Mechanical removals reduce knotweed height, but have no
effect on stem density • Oak saplings have more rapid growth and higher survival in
knotweed-‐removal plots • Knotweed rapidly recovers in the removal plots, and the
growth of other species is limited
Year - NY Botanical Garden
Kno
twee
d S
tem
Cou
nt
Cutting - NYBGGrubbing - NYBGControl - NYBG
2010 2011 2012
020
4060
80100
Year - Bronx River Forest
Cutting - BRFGrubbing - BRFControl - BRF
2010 2011 2012
020
4060
80100
Year - NY Botanical Garden
Kno
twee
d S
tem
Hei
ght (
cm)
Cutting - NYBGGrubbing - NYBGControl - NYBG
2010 2011 2012
030
6090
120
160
200
Year - Bronx River Forest
Cutting - BRFGrubbing - BRFControl - BRF
2010 2011 2012
030
6090
120
160
200
Year - NY Botanical Garden
Pin
Oak
Ste
m D
iam
eter
(cm
)
Cutting - NYBGGrubbing - NYBGControl - NYBG
2010 2011 2012
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
Year - Bronx River Forest
Cutting - BRFGrubbing - BRFControl - BRF
2010 2011 2012
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
Year - NY Botanical GardenP
in O
ak H
eigh
t (cm
)
Cutting - NYBGGrubbing - NYBGControl - NYBG
2010 2011 2012
100120140160180200220
Year - Bronx River Forest
Cutting - BRFGrubbing - BRFControl - BRF
2010 2011 2012
100120140160180200220
Year - NY Botanical Garden
Pin
Oak
Per
cent
Sur
viva
l
Cutting - NYBGGrubbing - NYBGControl - NYBG
2010 2011 2012
3040
5060
7080
90
Year - Bronx River Forest
Cutting - BRFGrubbing - BRFControl - BRF
2010 2011 2012
3040
5060
7080
90
Year - NY Botanical Garden
Spe
cies
Ric
hnes
s
Cutting - NYBGGrubbing - NYBGControl - NYBG
2010 2011 2012
05
1015
20
Year - Bronx River Forest
Cutting - BRFGrubbing - BRFControl - BRF
2010 2011 2012
05
1015
20