Understanding off-label use and the
information needs of patients:
a pilot Eurordis survey in rare diseases
Drug Information Transparency and
Access (DITA) Task Force Compiled by Rob Camp and Richard West
24-25 September 2012
Background
4000 to 6000 distinct rare diseases
– Defined as <1/2000 or <250,000 patients EU-wide
– 4-6% of EU population affected
More than 1000 OMP designated
– Of which 71 are authorised for 83 rare indications
Most patients with a rare disease are not treated
with an authorised orphan medicine
– when they are treated
Off-label use is the rule, not the exception in RD
18% of patients with a RD rejected by HCP
– 85% due to disease complexity (EurordisCare 3 survey)
2 DITA task force - joint PCWP/HCPWP 24-25/09/2012
One example
24-25/09/2012 DITA task force - joint PCWP/HCPWP 3
Jenny’s parents’ garage
In infancy, J was diagnosed with cystinosis
Medically, she suffered renal failure by the
age of 6 (+ hypothyroidism, insulin-dep. diabetes,
hepato-splenomegaly with hypertension, muscle and
cerebral involvement, photophobia)
Her parents refused to sit idly by
They contacted pharma companies
They learned how to treat their child “off-
label”, where nobody had been before
Getting information directly from the
company was life-saving
Jenny received daily dialysis until age 22
Her parents created Climb, the National
Information Centre on Metabolic Diseases in
the UK, so children like Jenny can live
longer
Objectives
OL: Off-label ADRs: Adverse Drug Reactions
4 DITA task force - joint PCWP/HCPWP 24-25/09/2012
90 conditions, 105+ off label uses
Condition Product Indication Off label use
Dravet syndrome Urbanyl Epilepsy, but not
recommended for
use in children
between the ages
of six months and
three years
5 mg twice a day since the
age of 6 months.
With micropakine, diacomit,
epitomax
Friedreich Ataxia Idebenone Alzheimer's
disease and other
cognitive defects
720 mg/day for 12 years
Behcet disease Thalidomide Multiple
myeloma
1 mg/kg/week to
1 mg/kg/day
5 DITA task force - joint PCWP/HCPWP 24-25/09/2012
Methodology
Online survey, 5 languages
Short description on what is off-label, why we were
doing the survey with (18) questions
Open for 2 months (Eng) or 1 month (other
languages), May-Jul 2012
One reminder sent in all languages, two in Spanish
Developed by DITA at Eurordis from Nov 2010
Target population – people with rare diseases who
had used drugs off-label in the past
6 DITA task force - joint PCWP/HCPWP 24-25/09/2012
Who answered our survey?
61%
33%
3% 3%
The person taking thetreatment
A parent
Another family member
Another care provider
7 DITA task force - joint PCWP/HCPWP 24-25/09/2012
Respondents’ language
66
28
81
28
52
English
Spanish
German
Italian
French
8 DITA task force - joint PCWP/HCPWP 24-25/09/2012
294 responses received
255 analysed
Who proposed the (OL) use?
16%
80%
I did
The doctor
I don't remember
Another professional
1% 3%
9 DITA task force - joint PCWP/HCPWP 24-25/09/2012
Was it explicitly discussed that the drug was off-label?
Yes No I do not remember
German 69 5 7
Italian 20 6 2
English 38 19 7
French 26 23 3
Spanish 11 6 10
TOTAL 164 59 29
10 DITA task force - joint PCWP/HCPWP 24-25/09/2012
Should there be more explanation about risk/benefit?
Yes No The doctor knows best I do not know
French 34 4 17 1
English 46 14 7 9
German 59 5 18 7
Spanish 20 0 4 4
Italian 22 4 1 1 TOTAL 211 27 47 22
11 DITA task force - joint PCWP/HCPWP 24-25/09/2012
Common “more explanation”comments
…the side effects are what patients should be told about, and how severe (they may be)
We did not know it was an off-label indication until my father went blind due to the drug
Helpful – a phone line, email link, Internet research, signed written consents
The doctor was very clear, I understood it all…
I find myself desperately accepting whatever the doctor offers…
Doctors do not know everything
12 DITA task force - joint PCWP/HCPWP 24-25/09/2012
Were there adverse events while taking the drug?
Yes No I do not remember
English 11 52 2
Italian 6 17 2
German 29 49 1
French 19 31 2
Spanish 8 11 2
TOTAL 83 160 9
13 DITA task force - joint PCWP/HCPWP 24-25/09/2012
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Spanish
French
German
TOTAL
Italian
English
38%
37%
37%
33%
24%
17%
52%
60%
62%
63%
68%
80%
10%
4%
1%
4%
8%
3%
Yes
No
I do not remember
Adverse events descriptions
…it did incapacitate my abilities of clear and rapid thinking permanently, it produces a mental blockage and intracranial pressure. It also caused constipation and/or diarrhoea.
(there has been a drop) in my blood platelets, haemoglobin and red cells. I have required various transfusions of platelets and red corpuscles
the copper … gets deposited in the brain, he was temporarily incapacitated, … was hospitalised and now has some sequelae
Severe aches, itching, headaches, dizziness and hyper-sex drive which continued for approx 5 years - never investigated by a health professional or even warned (about them)…
Tunnel vision, lack of coordination, frequent falling, impaired brain function, blackouts. While driving home from work, I blacked out in the car for several seconds.
Nerve end damage to my fingers and feet. Pins and needles in my feet and hands. I was violently ill, throwing up, fever, rash - no permanent damage
14 DITA task force - joint PCWP/HCPWP 24-25/09/2012
Did you report the adverse event?
80%
19%
1%
Yes
No
I do not remember
15 DITA task force - joint PCWP/HCPWP 24-25/09/2012
Yes No A website is enough No opinion
English 44 7 17 10
French 33 5 8 9
Italian 22 2 5 0
Spanish 24 1 5 1
German 68 0 13 2 TOTAL 191 15 48 22
16 DITA task force - joint PCWP/HCPWP 24-25/09/2012
Should there be a dedicated help line to report side effects?
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
German
Spanish
Italian
TOTAL
French
English
82%
77%
76%
69%
60%
56%
0%
3%
7%
5%
9%
9%
16%
16%
17%
17%
15%
22%
2%
3%
0%
8%
16%
13%
Yes
No
A website is enough
No opinion
Should an informed consent form be required for off-label?
Yes No In certain circumstances I don’t know what an IC is No opinion
Italian 16 3 6 0 1
Spanish 16 0 5 4 3
English 35 7 19 3 4
German 37 19 20 3 3
French 20 13 6 3 11
TOTAL 124 42 56 13 22
17 DITA task force - joint PCWP/HCPWP 24-25/09/2012
Yes In some cases No I am unaware of any…
English 18 6 34 15
Italian 7 6 13 1
Spanish 4 2 16 5
German 20 7 53 1
French 9 3 36 5
TOTAL 58 24 152 27
18 DITA task force - joint PCWP/HCPWP 24-25/09/2012
Were there any supply or reimbursement issues?
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
French
German
Spanish
TOTAL
Italian
English
68%
65%
59%
58%
48%
47%
17%
25%
15%
22%
26%
25%
6%
9%
7%
9%
22%
8%
9%
1%
19%
10%
4%
21%
No
Yes
In some cases
I am unaware of any…
Your rating of the off-label experience
Very satisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Very dissatisfied
English 40 14 2 6
Spanish 5 9 5 1
German 49 17 4 5
Italian 11 9 3 1
French 29 15 2 3
TOTAL 134 63 16 16
19 DITA task force - joint PCWP/HCPWP 24-25/09/2012
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
English
German
French
TOTAL
Italian
Spanish
65%
65%
59%
59%
46%
25%
23%
23%
31%
28%
38%
45%
3%
5%
4%
7%
13%
25%
10%
7%
6%
7%
4%
5%
Very satisfied
Satisfied
Dissatisfied
Very dissatisfied
Your OL experience
There aren’t many specific treatments and there is not a lot of research because it isn’t money-making for the big pharma companies, (so) other drugs do help alleviate some of the symptoms, although they are not indicated, and as long as they explain about the risk/benefit, it (the OL) seems fine to me
It (the treatment) seems to be working
The treatment has given me 18 months remission and I have not had to take any other medication since my treatment
I do think that records should be kept of off-label usage so they can be collated to inform both medics and patients of the success or otherwise of the drug …
Depends on the drug – some are failures, others work well
No significant changes, the condition is not getting worse
It worked but there are lots of side effects
20 DITA task force - joint PCWP/HCPWP 24-25/09/2012
Discussion
Patients’ and doctors’ ability to communicate fully is limited
– OL risks can be ameliorated by fuller communication at all steps
in the therapeutic process
Patients’ understanding of OL is limited
Types of adverse events here are significant – even when
only 1/3 experience them, those who do have stories to tell
The less information/understanding of OL, the less
comfortable with OL & their treatment a person may be
– Does this also coordinate with comfort of being able to share
with your doctor?
Patients need and want more (and better) treatments
Patients need and want more information – How can this be done?
21 DITA task force - joint PCWP/HCPWP 24-25/09/2012
90 conditions, 105+ off-label uses
Condition Product Indication Off label use
Sotos syndrome +
congenital heart
disease + heart
failure as a baby
IV
furosemide
congestive heart
failure and edema
As a baby used IV furosemide
orally to reduce fluid load as
there was no suitable per os
dose
Macular
degeneration
Avastin Renal Cell
carcinoma, Non-
Small-Cell Lung
carc., Breast,
Colorectal and
Ovarian
neoplasms
My father had an injection of
Avastin for macular degeneration
on 20/02/2012 and the drug was
contaminated.
He went blind within two hours. I
now know 14 patients who were
affected by this batch
Narcolepsia
cataplexia
teronac Short-term (i.e., a
few weeks)
treatment of
exogenous obesity
(amphetamine like)
1 dose per day, lifelong, with
Modiodal and Effexor
23 DITA task force - joint PCWP/HCPWP 24-25/09/2012
Were you comfortable with it being off-label?
Yes Somewhat No
English 54 9 7
French 38 8 4
German 58 17 5
Italian 17 9 2
Spanish 9 7 12 TOTAL 176 50 30
24 DITA task force - joint PCWP/HCPWP 24-25/09/2012
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Spanish
Italian
TOTAL
German
French
English