Transcript
Page 1: What’s the Big Deal with Open Access? Traditional Publishing Houses and OA” – Thoughts from Lund Online

Los Angeles | London | New DelhiSingapore | Washington DC

Open Access in theHumanities and Social SciencesA SAGE Perspective

Melissa HoldenOpen Access Development Editor

Page 2: What’s the Big Deal with Open Access? Traditional Publishing Houses and OA” – Thoughts from Lund Online

Lund – March 2014 Los Angeles | London | New DelhiSingapore | Washington DC

1. OA at SAGE

2. Open Access and the Librarian

3. The Avoidance of Double dipping

Page 3: What’s the Big Deal with Open Access? Traditional Publishing Houses and OA” – Thoughts from Lund Online

Lund – March 2014 Los Angeles | London | New DelhiSingapore | Washington DC

OA at SAGE

Page 4: What’s the Big Deal with Open Access? Traditional Publishing Houses and OA” – Thoughts from Lund Online

Lund – March 2014 Los Angeles | London | New DelhiSingapore | Washington DC

OA at SAGE: author choice

● Growing portfolio of gold OA journals • CC BY for all, with author choice for other licences

● SAGE Choice (hybrid programme)• CC BY or CC BY-NC

Page 5: What’s the Big Deal with Open Access? Traditional Publishing Houses and OA” – Thoughts from Lund Online

Lund – March 2014 Los Angeles | London | New DelhiSingapore | Washington DC

SAGE is Green

Compliant

Authors can deposit/archive the version of the article accepted for publication in their own institution’s repository/personal website immediately with no embargo period

Page 6: What’s the Big Deal with Open Access? Traditional Publishing Houses and OA” – Thoughts from Lund Online

Lund – March 2014 Los Angeles | London | New DelhiSingapore | Washington DC

Why SAGE Open?

The first HSS “mega journal”

Premier destination for quality OA

research in HSS

Page 7: What’s the Big Deal with Open Access? Traditional Publishing Houses and OA” – Thoughts from Lund Online

Lund – March 2014 Los Angeles | London | New DelhiSingapore | Washington DC

SAGE: SA(ra)GE(orge)SAGE was founded by Sara and

George Miller McCune in 1965 with a mission to support the dissemination of scholarly research and education

Sara’s will transfers ownership of SAGE to a charities and establishes a trust whose purpose is to maintain the company as an independent publisher for the indefinite future

Page 8: What’s the Big Deal with Open Access? Traditional Publishing Houses and OA” – Thoughts from Lund Online

Lund – March 2014 Los Angeles | London | New DelhiSingapore | Washington DC

Why SAGE Open?

Sara’s mission: support the dissemination of scholarly research and education • Campaign for Social Science and research

• US: oppose FIRST Act

• Nurturing interdisciplinary research• Independence = long term view• Experiment with OA and technology

• Open access publishing requires investment in back office systems

Page 9: What’s the Big Deal with Open Access? Traditional Publishing Houses and OA” – Thoughts from Lund Online
Page 10: What’s the Big Deal with Open Access? Traditional Publishing Houses and OA” – Thoughts from Lund Online

Lund – March 2014 Los Angeles | London | New DelhiSingapore | Washington DC

Monthly submission data

Janu

ary

Febru

ary

Mar

chApr

ilM

ayJu

ne July

Augus

t

Septe

mbe

r

Oct

ober

Novem

ber

Decem

ber

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

201120122013

Page 11: What’s the Big Deal with Open Access? Traditional Publishing Houses and OA” – Thoughts from Lund Online

Lund – March 2014 Los Angeles | London | New DelhiSingapore | Washington DC

Experiment with APCs in HSS

$195

$395

$99

2011 2012 20130

200400600800100012001400

904

432

1414$695 List Price

SAGE Open survey: Over 70% constituted personal payments

Page 12: What’s the Big Deal with Open Access? Traditional Publishing Houses and OA” – Thoughts from Lund Online

Lund – March 2014 Los Angeles | London | New DelhiSingapore | Washington DC

DOAJ by subject

2,414 Social Sciences OA

journals = 16%

Only 13% levy APCs

Page 13: What’s the Big Deal with Open Access? Traditional Publishing Houses and OA” – Thoughts from Lund Online

Lund – March 2014 Los Angeles | London | New DelhiSingapore | Washington DC

UK Funding

Page 14: What’s the Big Deal with Open Access? Traditional Publishing Houses and OA” – Thoughts from Lund Online

Lund – March 2014 Los Angeles | London | New DelhiSingapore | Washington DC

US Funding if FIRST Act passes

Page 15: What’s the Big Deal with Open Access? Traditional Publishing Houses and OA” – Thoughts from Lund Online

Lund – March 2014 Los Angeles | London | New DelhiSingapore | Washington DC

Building a broad, engaged community: article editors and reviewers

23,770 registered reviewers

7,400 invited to review

3,572 reviewed

12,062 invited article editors

2,100 agreed article editors

Page 16: What’s the Big Deal with Open Access? Traditional Publishing Houses and OA” – Thoughts from Lund Online

Lund – March 2014 Los Angeles | London | New DelhiSingapore | Washington DC

The challenge:Explaining and educating about SAGE Open and OA

2011 2012 20130

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

Time to First Decision

# o

f D

ay

s

Page 17: What’s the Big Deal with Open Access? Traditional Publishing Houses and OA” – Thoughts from Lund Online

Lund – March 2014 Los Angeles | London | New DelhiSingapore | Washington DC

Top considerations for submitting:● SAGE’s reputation● Subject fit● Quality of previously published authors or

papers● Internationality of journal

SAGE Open author survey:71% of respondents said

SAGE Open was their first choice

Page 18: What’s the Big Deal with Open Access? Traditional Publishing Houses and OA” – Thoughts from Lund Online

Lund – March 2014 Los Angeles | London | New DelhiSingapore | Washington DC

Citations

● Total cited SAGE Open articles 65

● SAGE Open articles cited by ISI ranked journals 23

● Total citations 112

● Citations by ranked journals 31

● Most citations of one article 10

Over 730,000 downloads to 500 papers

Page 19: What’s the Big Deal with Open Access? Traditional Publishing Houses and OA” – Thoughts from Lund Online

Lund – March 2014 Los Angeles | London | New DelhiSingapore | Washington DC

Experimenting with Drupal technology

Page 20: What’s the Big Deal with Open Access? Traditional Publishing Houses and OA” – Thoughts from Lund Online

Lund – March 2014 Los Angeles | London | New DelhiSingapore | Washington DC

Lessons Learnt

● Academic selection mechanisms different in HSS

● Intellectual property is the idea itself● Licensing - concerns over derivative use

● Immediacy not so crucial

● SAGE Open is additive - it has created a new vehicle

Page 21: What’s the Big Deal with Open Access? Traditional Publishing Houses and OA” – Thoughts from Lund Online

Lund – March 2014 Los Angeles | London | New DelhiSingapore | Washington DC

THE OA LIBRARIAN

Page 22: What’s the Big Deal with Open Access? Traditional Publishing Houses and OA” – Thoughts from Lund Online

Lund – March 2014 Los Angeles | London | New DelhiSingapore | Washington DC

Librarian OA extras

● Crucial role in disseminating OA content

● Some manage/allocate institutional/govt OA funding

● Promote researcher engagement with OA

Page 23: What’s the Big Deal with Open Access? Traditional Publishing Houses and OA” – Thoughts from Lund Online

Lund – March 2014 Los Angeles | London | New DelhiSingapore | Washington DC

2013 UK librarian feedbackSAGE with Jisc

● Practical challenges with OA:• How to allocate OA funding• How to record and track APCs• Researcher lack of awareness with gold OA• Advising researchers on quality OA journals

www.uk.sagepub.com/repository/binaries/pdf/apc.pdf

Page 24: What’s the Big Deal with Open Access? Traditional Publishing Houses and OA” – Thoughts from Lund Online

Lund – March 2014 Los Angeles | London | New DelhiSingapore | Washington DC

UK librarian recommendations

• Clearer guidance from funders about allocation• Better information about licences and funder

compliance• Robust APC management• Make budgeting easy with clear publishers’

policies on double dipping

Page 25: What’s the Big Deal with Open Access? Traditional Publishing Houses and OA” – Thoughts from Lund Online

Lund – March 2014 Los Angeles | London | New DelhiSingapore | Washington DC

Avoidance of double dipping: Fundamentally simple

What’s the fairest way? For whom?

But how?

Journal of Double

Dipping Policy

Journal of Double

Dipping Policy

=

Page 26: What’s the Big Deal with Open Access? Traditional Publishing Houses and OA” – Thoughts from Lund Online

Lund – March 2014 Los Angeles | London | New DelhiSingapore | Washington DC

Local vs Global

Try to satisfy all groups to be fair

LOCAL UNIVERSITY

1. Individual/single subscribers

2. Big deal subscribers

Journal of Double

Dipping Policy

APC

Page 27: What’s the Big Deal with Open Access? Traditional Publishing Houses and OA” – Thoughts from Lund Online

Lund – March 2014 Los Angeles | London | New DelhiSingapore | Washington DC

Current SAGE statement

● 2012: <0.25% of papers were published SAGE Choice

● SAGE will not be charging subscribers for open access content in hybrid journals where the author has paid an APC

● We are working on a model to ensure fairness for the 2015 subscription year which we will be discussing with our society publishing partners prior to implementation.

http://www.uk.sagepub.com/librarians/subspricing.sp

Page 28: What’s the Big Deal with Open Access? Traditional Publishing Houses and OA” – Thoughts from Lund Online

Lund – March 2014 Los Angeles | London | New DelhiSingapore | Washington DC

Summary

● SAGE is green compliant● SAGE Open has created a new vehicle for OA

in HSS● Experimenting with OA● Librarians have a crucial OA role to play

Page 29: What’s the Big Deal with Open Access? Traditional Publishing Houses and OA” – Thoughts from Lund Online

Lund – March 2014 Los Angeles | London | New DelhiSingapore | Washington DC

Thank you!

[email protected]

David Ross, OA Executive Publisher [email protected]


Recommended